Here's some inconsistencies that made me doubt the classic chronology: The experts tell us that the ancient temples and pyramids of Egypt were built thousands & thousands of years ago. They say the ancient Greek temples and Roman ruins were built more than 2000-2500 years ago. Then, they claim that a thousand years passed with virtually no significant architecture in Europe. Then, the Gothic cathedrals were built. Are we to believe a 1000 years went by with nobody built anything? ???
1000 years went by without anything so interesting that you'd know about it with nothing more than a passing interest.
Most people only know of the olmec, mayan and aztec civilisations in south america but there were much more, these are just the most prevalent and interesting.
I'm a Doctoral Scholar with decades of post-graduate inter-disciplinary studies.
Excavating the facts of human chronology, archaeology, geology, nature's forces, world religions, false economies, manipulated militaries, etc., etc., has required more than a passing interest.
The truth about our Earth, sun, solar system, galaxy & universe (space/time, etc.) in no way resembles the paradigm from our parents, preachers, teachers, professors, publishers, producers, etc.
Of course it's silly. There's a lot of things going for our current system of chronology, not least that we can see distinct settlement strata, and moreover have literary records from all ages (including the so-called dark.) From more ancient times we have continual records from about 1500BC onward, and even from before then. You can argue exact dates, but the generality is certainly correct.
Jesus was a clever magician, nothing more, nothing less. My brother repeats some of the tricks jesus once used himself, the bible was a fictional story which led half the world to somehow believing it. who cares when jesus was supposebly born, noone cares its well into the past and doesn't make a difference and if u want a good debate learn about the cause of global warming which is a current issue!
You may not care when Jesus was born, I may not care either, but to say 'no one cares' and you force people to ask just how connected you are with the rest of the world. Perhaps they shouldn't but it cannot be denied millions do.
"no one cares" is as fantastic a claim as anything that might be found in that book
Prior to 16th cy chronology was a part of maths. Clergy misappropriated in 16th cy and manipulated it into oblivion. no, that`s not dv code, it`s academic, but quite readable.
thousands take it seriously. Fomenko is clean statistics first and foremost. Over some 30 years of controversy, Russian historians have made a most remarkable transition - they were initially accusing the young brilliant mathematician Fomenko of anticommunist dissident activity and attempts to deface the historical legacy of Soviet Russia; nowadays the middle-aged mathematician is accused of adhering to "pro-communist Russian nationalism" and defacing the proud historical legacy of Great Russia.
What's interesting about this to me is that Garry Kasparov takes it seriously and wrote a preface to this. "New Chronology" is a hobby of his. His vocation is now politics, not chess.
you`ll find your answers:go to google>to `more`> to `book search`>type keyword `fomenko`, read TOC or the whole book for this matter and free of charge. St Augustin was prescient when he spoke unto us: "be wary of mathematicians, particularly when they speak the truth."
Necromatory, we do have near to the first Bibles, at least within a century or so of them being written. They're in Greek, though, and most people wouldn't care to see a scrap of papyrus with Greek letters on it. It is, however, of an entirely different literary sort than Greek mythology.
check this heresy just in case: go to google>to `more`> to `book search`>type keyword `fomenko`, read TOC or the whole book for this matter and free of charge
Once we take a closer look at history, we do however discover numerous inconsistencies and contradictions – for instance, that the Celts, the Romans and the Greeks are terms coined relatively recently meaning simply “the unfortunate ones (calamitatem)”, “the powerful ones” and “the Christians”. What nations could be referred to in this manner?
624 pages for 25 quid, are they fucking mental/ its woth 8.99 and not a penny more. greedy bastards it really casts doubt on the message.
ZLi0n 5 months ago
Remember the Ptolemaic circles within circles - epicircles?
FredrickToben 11 months ago
Love the keyboard music
phonnix 11 months ago
Erhem: Occam's razor.
GeneticsFTW 1 year ago
Here's some inconsistencies that made me doubt the classic chronology: The experts tell us that the ancient temples and pyramids of Egypt were built thousands & thousands of years ago. They say the ancient Greek temples and Roman ruins were built more than 2000-2500 years ago. Then, they claim that a thousand years passed with virtually no significant architecture in Europe. Then, the Gothic cathedrals were built. Are we to believe a 1000 years went by with nobody built anything? ???
7chakras1 2 years ago
1000 years went by without anything so interesting that you'd know about it with nothing more than a passing interest.
Most people only know of the olmec, mayan and aztec civilisations in south america but there were much more, these are just the most prevalent and interesting.
Chairmaneoin 2 years ago
I'm a Doctoral Scholar with decades of post-graduate inter-disciplinary studies.
Excavating the facts of human chronology, archaeology, geology, nature's forces, world religions, false economies, manipulated militaries, etc., etc., has required more than a passing interest.
The truth about our Earth, sun, solar system, galaxy & universe (space/time, etc.) in no way resembles the paradigm from our parents, preachers, teachers, professors, publishers, producers, etc.
7chakras1 2 years ago
Comment removed
poacher701 2 years ago
satans bullshit artists are everyplace.......pass the floride?
treon123456 2 years ago
Aheh you never existed.
royalsteven 3 years ago
lol
DogHouse2006 4 years ago
Watch "World History in one Minute" for the accepted dialectic version of world events.
EchosideProductions 4 years ago
Of course it's silly. There's a lot of things going for our current system of chronology, not least that we can see distinct settlement strata, and moreover have literary records from all ages (including the so-called dark.) From more ancient times we have continual records from about 1500BC onward, and even from before then. You can argue exact dates, but the generality is certainly correct.
dkrispin 4 years ago
Jesus was a clever magician, nothing more, nothing less. My brother repeats some of the tricks jesus once used himself, the bible was a fictional story which led half the world to somehow believing it. who cares when jesus was supposebly born, noone cares its well into the past and doesn't make a difference and if u want a good debate learn about the cause of global warming which is a current issue!
tennisplayer103 4 years ago
You may not care when Jesus was born, I may not care either, but to say 'no one cares' and you force people to ask just how connected you are with the rest of the world. Perhaps they shouldn't but it cannot be denied millions do.
"no one cares" is as fantastic a claim as anything that might be found in that book
Puck2442 3 years ago
Prior to 16th cy chronology was a part of maths. Clergy misappropriated in 16th cy and manipulated it into oblivion. no, that`s not dv code, it`s academic, but quite readable.
mithec 5 years ago
What if...? A good question, actually. "What if someone needed another $24.95 to help pay their utulities?" ...duh.
treborsdob 5 years ago
thousands take it seriously. Fomenko is clean statistics first and foremost. Over some 30 years of controversy, Russian historians have made a most remarkable transition - they were initially accusing the young brilliant mathematician Fomenko of anticommunist dissident activity and attempts to deface the historical legacy of Soviet Russia; nowadays the middle-aged mathematician is accused of adhering to "pro-communist Russian nationalism" and defacing the proud historical legacy of Great Russia.
mithec 5 years ago
What's interesting about this to me is that Garry Kasparov takes it seriously and wrote a preface to this. "New Chronology" is a hobby of his. His vocation is now politics, not chess.
uzeromay 5 years ago
you`ll find your answers:go to google>to `more`> to `book search`>type keyword `fomenko`, read TOC or the whole book for this matter and free of charge. St Augustin was prescient when he spoke unto us: "be wary of mathematicians, particularly when they speak the truth."
mithec 5 years ago
do you think other intelligent life in our entire universe spread the word or Jesus Christ? FUCK NO!
the government or someone knows EVERYTHING
but imagine if you had to tell the entire world
that their beliefs are that of a fictional book!!has the 1st bible been documented? shouldnt it be in a museum?
the story of jesus christ is just complete nonsense
i mean look at greek mythology! its hilarious!
so why not the same deal with christianity and religion all together?
Necromatory 5 years ago
Necromatory, we do have near to the first Bibles, at least within a century or so of them being written. They're in Greek, though, and most people wouldn't care to see a scrap of papyrus with Greek letters on it. It is, however, of an entirely different literary sort than Greek mythology.
dkrispin 4 years ago
check this heresy just in case: go to google>to `more`> to `book search`>type keyword `fomenko`, read TOC or the whole book for this matter and free of charge
mithec 5 years ago
$24.95? I think it's a rip off.
PyroLee 5 years ago
mathmatician making these claims? okay sure i believe him.
barrocks187 5 years ago
Jesus was born 1000 years ago lol. Seriously get some help.
prophetofdoom 5 years ago
Once we take a closer look at history, we do however discover numerous inconsistencies and contradictions – for instance, that the Celts, the Romans and the Greeks are terms coined relatively recently meaning simply “the unfortunate ones (calamitatem)”, “the powerful ones” and “the Christians”. What nations could be referred to in this manner?
mithec 5 years ago