This guy was strong, brutal, and ruthless. Killing a person is one thing but nearly decapitating her, disemboweling, and removing her uterus? Removing the uterus shows he didn't want her to be able to carry a child or he wanted to take what's most precious to a woman, the ability to bear children. Could this have been a woman that herself could not have children? Jack may turn out to be Jaqilen!
the killer most have been a buther because a buther can go on the streets with bloody clothes without being suspected and buthers have a lot of knifes.
A prostitute does absolutely nothing that deserves any disrespect. Prostitutes(which are both male and female, btw) do not force anyone to do anything. They do not hurt anyone. They provide a service for pay, which is pretty much what work is. They earn their money honestly. Just as honestly as a therapist or a masseuse. If you find it degrading, don't do it. Serial killers kill all kinds of people. The Ripper wasn't helping anyone. Just spreading fear.
@crackerHero No. Actually Jack the Ripper definitely did not go after these women becausethey are easily missed. He obviously wanted to be noticed. Possibly he went after women because in that time it was much more shocking to kill a woman then a man. He picked prostitutes because they were easily available. I think he enjoyed the fear he spread in London and the uproar. He was probably a nobody who did not want to die without ever being noticed. Well, he accomplished his goal. He is a legend.
Just look at modern day serial killers like BTK in Wichita, or Ted Bundy. They both worked and fit into society and yet they both had an evil side were they would go out and hunt, stalk and kill women. BTK admitted to stalking some victions for a year. I think JTR grew up and lived in the Whitechapel area of London, he was one of their own who moved freely about without bringing attention to himself and that is why he remains undetected.
@lowfuellevel I think that the modern killers may be partly wannabies and have their own ideal killer replica. As to where a serial killer who can be undetected is driven by some motive to kill certain same associated people even Richard Ramirez said that Ripper inspired him and he was considered very bloodthirsty. Im sure that Jack hated prostitution in it's full form
i like the royal theory the best, these girls knew each other, plus the killing stopped, serial killers tend to keep going untill caught, i dont think it was eddy or gull themselves, but other co horts,,its just my thoughts.. what about the cloth? can they not match d.n.a?
@NicolaWriter no eddy did not have an alibi for each night what he had , is alies and accomplices who were helping him to kill the girls queen victoria and the king were two of those. remmeber there is no truth in the written word unless god clarifies it through your intuition
Sir,we have to stick to facts. There is not a shred of evidence to support the royal conspiracy. Prince Edward has been completely dismissed as a suspect.
@abductedbyaliens8892 you said they saw a doctor wit blood all over him well he was a doctor so maybe they thought it wasnt anyything but im just sayin n im entitled to my opinion
she is the reincarnation of mary kelly she is being driven subconsciously to find justcice for what happened to her thats why she is drawn to jack the ripper
The Royal "conspiracy theory" is not proven to be a hoax, not at all. The theory of blackmail is very plausible, since a member of the Royal family (Prince Albert Victor) attending a pedophile brothel in Whitechapel is very likely to be blackmailed. He was blackmailed by Mary Kelly and her friends. Aleister Crowley was a major occultist and lodge member,was homo-pedophile too, and had access to the highest circles. Lord Randolph Spencer Churchill was the Ripper. All Masons taking bloody revenge.
It was certainly not some drunk psychopath and he didn't act on his own, it was well organized, ritual murder, and the ripper carved masonic symbols in the faces, they were ritually slaughtered according to the rules of a dark tradition. It was a terror warning to all who try to mess with the Masons, or with the Royal family, who are all Masons.
The only ones who are able to get away with these kind of crimes, being protected by the police and investigators, are the ones in high places, usually members of powerful freemasonic lodges and the royals. I'm not anti- royal, by the way, but i realise now what kind of unrestricted power these people really have, and they are tempted to abuse it.
you are the most accurate ive seen on these sites yet . well done . prince eddy was the killer. and after he killed the girls he started to see there ghosts ,and it sent him over the edge , he went to see doctor gull who hypnotized eddy and eddy spilled the beans as to what was troubling him . he was put in a mad ward. for a while and exalined and recorded, then it was decidedin orders from queen victoria that eddy be destroyed by lethal injection.the chief of police was a mason with eddy
the chief of police , doctor gull queen victoria and all the royal servanst were taken into a room and sworn to secrecy , that eddy was the ripper and that he had to be destroyed or britain would face a national embarassment .
doctor gull was also his homosexual lover and took the oppoortunity to have him killed, to save his own skin, and the chief of police also knew eddy becuase he was a mason with him .
the lady in the video is the reincarnation of mary kelly , she became a cop to protect vulnerable people like other female victims and gets a certain sense of satisfaction from catching people becuase jack was never caught .
she dont care about her victims any more than jack cared about his .she is healing her subconscious pain from her life as mary kelly by solving other womans crimes.
she is not conscious of this , but she is definatly being driven by her subconscious mind
and masy i ask what a good catholic god loving person is doing on a website like this looking at distastful images of young ladies being chopped to bits ?
Yes, you may ask. Because i got interested in the frightful events of the world, murders, wars, why these occur, and ended up with Masons, etc. like that. it's not that i'm especially turned on by violence, not at all.
The only people , who come to these site are the reincarnations of people that lived in london at those times. and people that died at jacks hands , and jacks reincarnation also which is me .
i came to bring truth , i have recognised a few reincarnations of the victims in here and i can feel there anger towrds me , which is understandable .
others that come just have a fascination with blooshed .
all powerful people abuse power, our politicains are ripping us off and usiing public funds to fund themselves, its a crokked world , what would have happned if eddy had of been revealed england would have been a laughing stock of the world , and caused no end of porblems .
our royal family has been the eye s of the world for years and years they had to destroy eddy .
Prince Eddy could not have done these murders. First of all, he was handicapped, secondly at the time of the murders he was confined at Sandringham Estate. There he learned of the gruesome murders and saw the photo's of Mary Kelly and her friends so horribly mutilated. Then he got a nervous breakdown. The real killer was not a weakling like Eddy, and he must have had complicitors. The theory of Sir Randolph Spencer Churchill, being the Ripper is still the most plausible one.
But then of course, if such be recognised, Great Britain would face the most humiliating scandal in her Royal history. And it is too powerful to let that happen.
exactly , thankyou now you see why he disapeared. more to the point the chief of police had the writting on the wall rubbed off, the reason being is becuase it said juw-es which was a masonic name refering to the masons .
he knew it was a mason and so investigated in private , the police chief knew the killer was eddy in the end and so did gull so they told queen victoria and she has eddy destroyed, to save national embarasement .
Could be. Still, a unstable figure as he was, would have had a hard time doing all this. But the last man seen with Mary Kelly before she died,looked a lot like Randolph Spencer Churchill, he was even wearing the exact same clothes.
If Eddy committed the murders, and was connected to the Masons (=anti-catholic), why would he marry a Catholic (!) woman, against the will of the Royals, and throw it all away?
@lithopoonwit he did not marry against royal will , he married in secret then she betrayed him and was going to blackmail him but he found out , her and the other 4 girls all plotted against eddy , so he silenced them all
@lithopoonwit no he did not queen victoria , the masons king edwrd and chief warren were all in on the plot to silence the girls all of them were masons including queen victoria
no not necasseraly it was dark, there was a heavy smog in area like whitechaple almost permanantly plus he was rushed in all but 1 murder you can tell because of the jaggard cuts etc. plus the film from hell was a load of crap (good movie terrible conclusion)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
each killing and mutilation from tabram to kelly became progressively more brutal and complete. He was learning his trade. the murders all took place at weekends or public holidays - he was employed. He would have been very well known to the prostitutes of whitechapel - a regular client. He would have been a well known figure in all the pubs - he was a drinker. he would have made a great show of being concerned about the killings and would have helped in the hunt joining the vigilantes.
it had to be james maybrick or kozminski, cause when kozminski was caught the killings stopped. then again maybrick had a diary about the killings and discribed them very well altought they thought diary was a fake. plus maybrick names give us a possible clue that it was was him: JAmes maybiCK.
As to the last bit, "Jack" would be the English equivalent of "John Doe." It's a filler for a person whose name is not otherwise known, so that "That Guy, the Ripper" may just as well be the killer's name (the killer's name itself comes mostly from press coverage, at any rate, as the veracity of the letters signed "Jack the Ripper" are hotly disputed and the press popularized the name- originally "Jack" was called the "Whitechapel Murderer" or similar names). ;)
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
im knocked back by your expert knowledge on the suspect! you must have watched a whole episode of this documentary all the way through without stopping!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
kosminski wasn't caught. he was committed to an asylum by his brother in 1889 because he was incoherent and unable to look after himself. the police never arrested him. why? because they had no proof. kosminski only became a suspect in 1891. why? because they hadnt a clue who it was & were desperate to solve the case to try and save their own reputations. the police top brass were anti-semitic so they automatically chose a jew. the report on Kosminski stated he was an imbecile and not insane.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
the maybrick diary was a hoax - anyone with an ounce of common sense could see that. it was given to a scouser in a pub! He later confessed that he & his wife wrote it and baked it in the oven to age the ink! The ripper was neither kosminski or maybrick and the royal conspiracy is a hoax too- joseph sickert admitted he made it all up! the ripper was a local man, white, probably irish, aged about 30, average height, broadly built, moustache. he worked and was a regular user of prostitutes.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
he was anti-semitic - the chalk message implicates jews - and he was also alcoholic. he was seen tottering when he accosted liz stride. the only genuine ripper letter, the from hell note sent to lusk with half a kidney, is written in a very erratic style with blots & splashes. the ripper was a drunk. he was a disorganised impulsive killer who couldnt control his urges but was shrewd enough not to be caught. the jekyll and hyde analogy is quite relevant. his madness would have peaks.
I always thought that Annie Chapman was the most pitiful of the victims; they forgot to mention that the breakup of her marriage was helped by problems with her children. Annie and John's youngest, their son, was born crippled in 1880 and their elder daughter died at about the same time at age twelve. In her last days, Annie, who was never a great beauty, was also very sick from tuberculosis and syphilis and would soon have died without Jack's knife.
I agree and thought Mary Kelly's murder was horrific,the one that creeps me out the most is Catherine Eddowes. He had maybe ten minutes tops and he tore her apart. It it is just freaky.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Joseph Barnett is still the most likely candidate in that he had a motive and fits well with the witness accounts. He also fits modern fbi profiling in that he had no father, was in adequate and was local to the area. This type of mutilation had never been known in this country before which strongly suggests that it could have been an experienced barber surgeon or military field surgeon from eastern europe - a russian or pole.chapman it wasnt but this mysterious Konovalov could well be the man.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
There is no hard evidence for this theory or indeed any other but it is clear that JTR was being helped. the stride killing exposed the modus operandi- another man was close by ready to chase off anyone approaching & to warn the killer that the police were close. the mutilations were done by a man with some surgical experience. After stride a witness saw a man who matched the description of the man seen by schwartz in a nearby street wiping his hands.
The ripper was ordered by the secretery of state or government, to find a woman who was pregnant possibly by the prince of wales, rumoured to be a servant in the royal household. The killings stopped only when it was clear of the consequences of possible public uprising led by a Mr Tuft during this period, who used the killings to feed his political views. The theories have since changed to protect the Royals
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
what evidence is there for this theory or are you just speculating? in that case there could be a million different stories we could make up - JTR was an alien collecting specimens of human female anatomy! Apart from mary kelly all the other women were way over 40 (but looked 60) and there is no way they could have been pregnant! The royal thing is nonsense - joseph sickert admitted he made it up! JTR was a local man aged about 30 average height- all murders were at weekends so he was working.
none of the prostitutes over 40 were pregnant, however there was a rumour that they were hiding a woman who did indeed work at the palace, this is not speculation the records became public a few years ago. If we think of all murders since there is usually motive sexual or otherwise, none of the woman were sexually abused, nobody kills for the sake of killing for NO reason, had JTR been completely insane he would have continued no just suddenly stop.Lets think about it the killings were in:-
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
this documentary is important in that it concludes that the ripper was a 30 year old local male who lived and worked in the immediate area - ripper central. Joseph barnet fits this profile - he resided in Millers Court and then New St Bishopsgate in the final week. The ripper wasnt a jew - he was gentile. the dear boss letter and the goulston st grafitti are both written in IRISH dialogue. Barnet was irish and was attempting to shift blame onto jews - hence the jewish suspects - kosminski etc.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
and this fitted perfectly with the institutionalised racism of the police who immediately jumped to the conclusion that the killer had to be a foreigner especially a jew! kosminsky is a suspect that was plucked out of thin air by mcnaughton when writing his memoirs. If he knew who was guilty in 1888 then he would have said so and took all the credit for catching him. These police top brass were vain and arrogant old duffers, promoted through nepotism and were totally stupid, ignorant and racist!
built up areas in the dead of night, nobody heard a sound, the files indicate that apart from mary kelly who was killed in her appartment, the suspicion was that the victims were killed afterwhich their bodies were moved. You may ask where the murders took place? in a coach, with false royal markings, the royal coaches had diplomatic immunity against control by police. The truth is JTR was never caught and of all the theories I believe the conclusions of Chief Inspector Aberline
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
abberline was under the impression that the ripper was a foreign barber/surgeon from russia or poland. These types of men had experience in minor surgery but were employed as hairdressers in 1880s London. Polish George Chapman who eventually turned out to be a serial poisoner was one of his suspects but there was another man who he strongly suspected whom he confused with chapman because they looked alike. Abberline wasnt even certain of his name but this man was russian and used aliases.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Donald Mcormack in 59 proposed that this man was Alexander Pedachenko who was also know as Count Luiskovo and Vassily Konovalov. He was a russian trained as a surgeon and employed in London 1888 in Walworth at a surgery. He was a master of disguise and dressed as a woman to evade capture. Abberlines suspect was really this man and not george chapman. the source of this theory was the bulletin of the Czarist secret police, which advised all officers that Konovalov had died in an asylum.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Mcormacks claims that the canonical ripper victims all attended a clinic in Walworth where Konovalov worked for a DR Williams. Each of them had links with this area. It could explain why they all went willingingly with this man. He claims hhe worked with 2 others - a women called wimberg and a man called Levitski who acted as look out. The cry of "lipski" by the ripper suspect to a 2nd man at the stride killing when israel schwartz disturbed the murder could easily have been "Levitski" ....
maybe they were not the preetiest or even the nicest women in the world but they hardly deserved to be sliced open like pieces of raw meat to presented like fish in a tank. He was a sick, twisted vile
human being and I think underneath he knew just how ugly he was so much darkness. so please dont mock the dead
Annie Chapman was the only victim who was overweight, and Mary Jane Kelly was described as buxom.
Also, have you any respect for women? Not every woman can be a supermodel and, what's more, women also have feelings. None of these women deserved to be killed; they were living on the margins, they were desperate to survive by any means, they were worn down by poverty...
@diddims Yeah sorry for that long awaited reply,i figured being right and remaining right is two different things. So im going to tell you this. Yes those woman were humans and when it comes the modern ages,we can say only that a person can choose the sort of life he wants to live. If you bring yourself to be ruined by fate and controlled by your genes. Then you have the result,you can see the obvious from the people you obtained your genetic information (Parents etc)
@akatsukicloak See, I don't think many people here would cry if a serial killer decided to target cruel, snide, self impressed jerks(like you). But we would still be sad for the loss of life. If we start deciding what kind of people wouldn't be missed, you might not like the outcome.
Sorry,but i don't think that by judging someone you will show yourself of better ethics or come out morally better. Rather than to provide a clean argument. Have a nice day.
This guy was strong, brutal, and ruthless. Killing a person is one thing but nearly decapitating her, disemboweling, and removing her uterus? Removing the uterus shows he didn't want her to be able to carry a child or he wanted to take what's most precious to a woman, the ability to bear children. Could this have been a woman that herself could not have children? Jack may turn out to be Jaqilen!
MrDayd3 2 months ago
the killer most have been a buther because a buther can go on the streets with bloody clothes without being suspected and buthers have a lot of knifes.
Swedishmale98 4 months ago
A prostitute does absolutely nothing that deserves any disrespect. Prostitutes(which are both male and female, btw) do not force anyone to do anything. They do not hurt anyone. They provide a service for pay, which is pretty much what work is. They earn their money honestly. Just as honestly as a therapist or a masseuse. If you find it degrading, don't do it. Serial killers kill all kinds of people. The Ripper wasn't helping anyone. Just spreading fear.
lollipopfop 10 months ago
jack went after already fucked lowlife people so nobody would care about them
crackerHero 1 year ago
@crackerHero No. Actually Jack the Ripper definitely did not go after these women becausethey are easily missed. He obviously wanted to be noticed. Possibly he went after women because in that time it was much more shocking to kill a woman then a man. He picked prostitutes because they were easily available. I think he enjoyed the fear he spread in London and the uproar. He was probably a nobody who did not want to die without ever being noticed. Well, he accomplished his goal. He is a legend.
lollipopfop 10 months ago
Just look at modern day serial killers like BTK in Wichita, or Ted Bundy. They both worked and fit into society and yet they both had an evil side were they would go out and hunt, stalk and kill women. BTK admitted to stalking some victions for a year. I think JTR grew up and lived in the Whitechapel area of London, he was one of their own who moved freely about without bringing attention to himself and that is why he remains undetected.
lowfuellevel 1 year ago
@lowfuellevel I think that the modern killers may be partly wannabies and have their own ideal killer replica. As to where a serial killer who can be undetected is driven by some motive to kill certain same associated people even Richard Ramirez said that Ripper inspired him and he was considered very bloodthirsty. Im sure that Jack hated prostitution in it's full form
akatsukicloak 1 year ago
Jack was a violent misogynist... not surprised. Most serial killers are. Naturally he went after prostitutes and drunks.
kkkkkimberlyyyyy 1 year ago
So,did they ever find who was the Jack the Ripper ??? i dont think so...
cikcak01 1 year ago
Robert Mann has been deemed the most likely suspect due to recent evidence.
MrTheSwampthing 1 year ago
i like the royal theory the best, these girls knew each other, plus the killing stopped, serial killers tend to keep going untill caught, i dont think it was eddy or gull themselves, but other co horts,,its just my thoughts.. what about the cloth? can they not match d.n.a?
nosebuzz 1 year ago
Prince Edward had an alibi for every night in question and Sir William Gull was an old man. Will this Royal Conspiracy mess ever die?
A toff trolling in Whitechapel would have gotten his ass beaten and robbed. A native of the area,of the same class as the victims,wouldn't.
NicolaWriter 2 years ago
@NicolaWriter no eddy did not have an alibi for each night what he had , is alies and accomplices who were helping him to kill the girls queen victoria and the king were two of those. remmeber there is no truth in the written word unless god clarifies it through your intuition
AwsomWarrior 1 year ago
@AwsomWarrior
Sir,we have to stick to facts. There is not a shred of evidence to support the royal conspiracy. Prince Edward has been completely dismissed as a suspect.
NicolaWriter 1 year ago
they kept eye on that doctor suspect who lived on batty street in whitechapel, they saw him with blood all over him, but did nothing.....
abductedbyaliens8892 2 years ago
@abductedbyaliens8892 you said they saw a doctor wit blood all over him well he was a doctor so maybe they thought it wasnt anyything but im just sayin n im entitled to my opinion
Band69Geek 2 years ago
why do you remove all the messeges from goldenmessenger
lilselgomez12 2 years ago
doesn't removed by the author mean that the person posting it has removed it?
Boubala24 2 years ago 2
@lilselgomez12 dont worry goldenmessenger is still here im peacemaker now , i removed them becuase people are not ready for the truth
1974PeaceMaker 2 years ago
the placement of chapmans body is not entirely accurate
Scottthefish 2 years ago
She is very good this investigator...
I think he is a sick pro..
wow.
Dorisequador 2 years ago
Comment removed
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
What are you talking about boy?
Dorisequador 2 years ago
Comment removed
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
Good for you, now make sure you take your medication LOL.
j90brit 2 years ago
god bless you.
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
she is the reincarnation of mary kelly she is being driven subconsciously to find justcice for what happened to her thats why she is drawn to jack the ripper
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
The Royal "conspiracy theory" is not proven to be a hoax, not at all. The theory of blackmail is very plausible, since a member of the Royal family (Prince Albert Victor) attending a pedophile brothel in Whitechapel is very likely to be blackmailed. He was blackmailed by Mary Kelly and her friends. Aleister Crowley was a major occultist and lodge member,was homo-pedophile too, and had access to the highest circles. Lord Randolph Spencer Churchill was the Ripper. All Masons taking bloody revenge.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
It was certainly not some drunk psychopath and he didn't act on his own, it was well organized, ritual murder, and the ripper carved masonic symbols in the faces, they were ritually slaughtered according to the rules of a dark tradition. It was a terror warning to all who try to mess with the Masons, or with the Royal family, who are all Masons.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
wow...that is a cool theory ... can u explain a bit deaper...?
evelinapaper2 2 years ago
You can see it for yourself. it's on my favorite's list. check it out.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
The only ones who are able to get away with these kind of crimes, being protected by the police and investigators, are the ones in high places, usually members of powerful freemasonic lodges and the royals. I'm not anti- royal, by the way, but i realise now what kind of unrestricted power these people really have, and they are tempted to abuse it.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
you are the most accurate ive seen on these sites yet . well done . prince eddy was the killer. and after he killed the girls he started to see there ghosts ,and it sent him over the edge , he went to see doctor gull who hypnotized eddy and eddy spilled the beans as to what was troubling him . he was put in a mad ward. for a while and exalined and recorded, then it was decidedin orders from queen victoria that eddy be destroyed by lethal injection.the chief of police was a mason with eddy
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
the chief of police , doctor gull queen victoria and all the royal servanst were taken into a room and sworn to secrecy , that eddy was the ripper and that he had to be destroyed or britain would face a national embarassment .
doctor gull was also his homosexual lover and took the oppoortunity to have him killed, to save his own skin, and the chief of police also knew eddy becuase he was a mason with him .
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
the lady in the video is the reincarnation of mary kelly , she became a cop to protect vulnerable people like other female victims and gets a certain sense of satisfaction from catching people becuase jack was never caught .
she dont care about her victims any more than jack cared about his .she is healing her subconscious pain from her life as mary kelly by solving other womans crimes.
she is not conscious of this , but she is definatly being driven by her subconscious mind
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
I don't believe in reincarnation, i'm a catholic Christian. You're a funny guy (or girl).
I am sure the Royal family has everything to do with these murders. That is the sole reason why it is "unsolved" till this day.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
and masy i ask what a good catholic god loving person is doing on a website like this looking at distastful images of young ladies being chopped to bits ?
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
Yes, you may ask. Because i got interested in the frightful events of the world, murders, wars, why these occur, and ended up with Masons, etc. like that. it's not that i'm especially turned on by violence, not at all.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
ok freind well i believe in god , and i have seen many miracles, and your question is a good one .
many many years ago man feel from grace when god felt he was restricing us and wanted to give us more freedom , so withdrew his energy.
this caused fear and panick and people started to form groups , and started to war with each other for possetions.
but we are returning to the light and we will once again live like the angels we once were.
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
god does not create suffering , we do , no one forces us to hurt others we do that ourselves, and then we get karma
that karma is to teach us that we must not do bad things its not through hurting others that we learn its through suffering
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
Comment removed
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
The only people , who come to these site are the reincarnations of people that lived in london at those times. and people that died at jacks hands , and jacks reincarnation also which is me .
i came to bring truth , i have recognised a few reincarnations of the victims in here and i can feel there anger towrds me , which is understandable .
others that come just have a fascination with blooshed .
so everyone has there reasons for coming here
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
all powerful people abuse power, our politicains are ripping us off and usiing public funds to fund themselves, its a crokked world , what would have happned if eddy had of been revealed england would have been a laughing stock of the world , and caused no end of porblems .
our royal family has been the eye s of the world for years and years they had to destroy eddy .
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
Prince Eddy could not have done these murders. First of all, he was handicapped, secondly at the time of the murders he was confined at Sandringham Estate. There he learned of the gruesome murders and saw the photo's of Mary Kelly and her friends so horribly mutilated. Then he got a nervous breakdown. The real killer was not a weakling like Eddy, and he must have had complicitors. The theory of Sir Randolph Spencer Churchill, being the Ripper is still the most plausible one.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
But then of course, if such be recognised, Great Britain would face the most humiliating scandal in her Royal history. And it is too powerful to let that happen.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
exactly , thankyou now you see why he disapeared. more to the point the chief of police had the writting on the wall rubbed off, the reason being is becuase it said juw-es which was a masonic name refering to the masons .
he knew it was a mason and so investigated in private , the police chief knew the killer was eddy in the end and so did gull so they told queen victoria and she has eddy destroyed, to save national embarasement .
the cop knew what damage it could do to britain
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
Comment removed
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
Comment removed
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
Comment removed
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
He would need a coach driver and a look-out.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
Comment removed
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
Could be. Still, a unstable figure as he was, would have had a hard time doing all this. But the last man seen with Mary Kelly before she died,looked a lot like Randolph Spencer Churchill, he was even wearing the exact same clothes.
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
Comment removed
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
If Eddy committed the murders, and was connected to the Masons (=anti-catholic), why would he marry a Catholic (!) woman, against the will of the Royals, and throw it all away?
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
Comment removed
goldenmessenger 2 years ago
If you study the profile.....the murders probably had nothing to do with that....
grenadaification 2 years ago
the masons have a rule that states that people may not be persicuted for their religion.
serridgeas 2 years ago
@lithopoonwit he did not marry against royal will , he married in secret then she betrayed him and was going to blackmail him but he found out , her and the other 4 girls all plotted against eddy , so he silenced them all
1974PeaceMaker 2 years ago
So you think this handicapped Prince eddy did this. all by himself?
lithopoonwit 2 years ago
@lithopoonwit no he did not queen victoria , the masons king edwrd and chief warren were all in on the plot to silence the girls all of them were masons including queen victoria
AwsomWarrior 1 year ago
no not necasseraly it was dark, there was a heavy smog in area like whitechaple almost permanantly plus he was rushed in all but 1 murder you can tell because of the jaggard cuts etc. plus the film from hell was a load of crap (good movie terrible conclusion)
serridgeas 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
each killing and mutilation from tabram to kelly became progressively more brutal and complete. He was learning his trade. the murders all took place at weekends or public holidays - he was employed. He would have been very well known to the prostitutes of whitechapel - a regular client. He would have been a well known figure in all the pubs - he was a drinker. he would have made a great show of being concerned about the killings and would have helped in the hunt joining the vigilantes.
bunterx 2 years ago
it had to be james maybrick or kozminski, cause when kozminski was caught the killings stopped. then again maybrick had a diary about the killings and discribed them very well altought they thought diary was a fake. plus maybrick names give us a possible clue that it was was him: JAmes maybiCK.
hapibth0pel3ss 2 years ago
Re Maybrick. The diary was a fake. The bloke who supposedly 'found it' has confessed that it was something concocted by him and his wife.
L88BS 2 years ago
As to the last bit, "Jack" would be the English equivalent of "John Doe." It's a filler for a person whose name is not otherwise known, so that "That Guy, the Ripper" may just as well be the killer's name (the killer's name itself comes mostly from press coverage, at any rate, as the veracity of the letters signed "Jack the Ripper" are hotly disputed and the press popularized the name- originally "Jack" was called the "Whitechapel Murderer" or similar names). ;)
Kitsune44X 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
im knocked back by your expert knowledge on the suspect! you must have watched a whole episode of this documentary all the way through without stopping!
bunterx 2 years ago
JAm PiCKle seems to offer a similar clue.
Speegs23 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
kosminski wasn't caught. he was committed to an asylum by his brother in 1889 because he was incoherent and unable to look after himself. the police never arrested him. why? because they had no proof. kosminski only became a suspect in 1891. why? because they hadnt a clue who it was & were desperate to solve the case to try and save their own reputations. the police top brass were anti-semitic so they automatically chose a jew. the report on Kosminski stated he was an imbecile and not insane.
bunterx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
the maybrick diary was a hoax - anyone with an ounce of common sense could see that. it was given to a scouser in a pub! He later confessed that he & his wife wrote it and baked it in the oven to age the ink! The ripper was neither kosminski or maybrick and the royal conspiracy is a hoax too- joseph sickert admitted he made it all up! the ripper was a local man, white, probably irish, aged about 30, average height, broadly built, moustache. he worked and was a regular user of prostitutes.
bunterx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
he was anti-semitic - the chalk message implicates jews - and he was also alcoholic. he was seen tottering when he accosted liz stride. the only genuine ripper letter, the from hell note sent to lusk with half a kidney, is written in a very erratic style with blots & splashes. the ripper was a drunk. he was a disorganised impulsive killer who couldnt control his urges but was shrewd enough not to be caught. the jekyll and hyde analogy is quite relevant. his madness would have peaks.
bunterx 2 years ago
I always thought that Annie Chapman was the most pitiful of the victims; they forgot to mention that the breakup of her marriage was helped by problems with her children. Annie and John's youngest, their son, was born crippled in 1880 and their elder daughter died at about the same time at age twelve. In her last days, Annie, who was never a great beauty, was also very sick from tuberculosis and syphilis and would soon have died without Jack's knife.
I can't help but feel sorry for her.
diddims 2 years ago 5
I agree and thought Mary Kelly's murder was horrific,the one that creeps me out the most is Catherine Eddowes. He had maybe ten minutes tops and he tore her apart. It it is just freaky.
Kitty273 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
is Jack the ripper still alive ???
Andylong99 2 years ago
i belive it was the psychotic kozminski (sp?); the fbi lab identified him as being the most likely candidate;
C7B27D7B4 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Joseph Barnett is still the most likely candidate in that he had a motive and fits well with the witness accounts. He also fits modern fbi profiling in that he had no father, was in adequate and was local to the area. This type of mutilation had never been known in this country before which strongly suggests that it could have been an experienced barber surgeon or military field surgeon from eastern europe - a russian or pole.chapman it wasnt but this mysterious Konovalov could well be the man.
bunterx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
There is no hard evidence for this theory or indeed any other but it is clear that JTR was being helped. the stride killing exposed the modus operandi- another man was close by ready to chase off anyone approaching & to warn the killer that the police were close. the mutilations were done by a man with some surgical experience. After stride a witness saw a man who matched the description of the man seen by schwartz in a nearby street wiping his hands.
bunterx 2 years ago
No killer since has mutilated like this.
Go with the first and more likely rumour.
The ripper was ordered by the secretery of state or government, to find a woman who was pregnant possibly by the prince of wales, rumoured to be a servant in the royal household. The killings stopped only when it was clear of the consequences of possible public uprising led by a Mr Tuft during this period, who used the killings to feed his political views. The theories have since changed to protect the Royals
unigateman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
what evidence is there for this theory or are you just speculating? in that case there could be a million different stories we could make up - JTR was an alien collecting specimens of human female anatomy! Apart from mary kelly all the other women were way over 40 (but looked 60) and there is no way they could have been pregnant! The royal thing is nonsense - joseph sickert admitted he made it up! JTR was a local man aged about 30 average height- all murders were at weekends so he was working.
bunterx 2 years ago
none of the prostitutes over 40 were pregnant, however there was a rumour that they were hiding a woman who did indeed work at the palace, this is not speculation the records became public a few years ago. If we think of all murders since there is usually motive sexual or otherwise, none of the woman were sexually abused, nobody kills for the sake of killing for NO reason, had JTR been completely insane he would have continued no just suddenly stop.Lets think about it the killings were in:-
unigateman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this documentary is important in that it concludes that the ripper was a 30 year old local male who lived and worked in the immediate area - ripper central. Joseph barnet fits this profile - he resided in Millers Court and then New St Bishopsgate in the final week. The ripper wasnt a jew - he was gentile. the dear boss letter and the goulston st grafitti are both written in IRISH dialogue. Barnet was irish and was attempting to shift blame onto jews - hence the jewish suspects - kosminski etc.
bunterx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
and this fitted perfectly with the institutionalised racism of the police who immediately jumped to the conclusion that the killer had to be a foreigner especially a jew! kosminsky is a suspect that was plucked out of thin air by mcnaughton when writing his memoirs. If he knew who was guilty in 1888 then he would have said so and took all the credit for catching him. These police top brass were vain and arrogant old duffers, promoted through nepotism and were totally stupid, ignorant and racist!
bunterx 2 years ago
built up areas in the dead of night, nobody heard a sound, the files indicate that apart from mary kelly who was killed in her appartment, the suspicion was that the victims were killed afterwhich their bodies were moved. You may ask where the murders took place? in a coach, with false royal markings, the royal coaches had diplomatic immunity against control by police. The truth is JTR was never caught and of all the theories I believe the conclusions of Chief Inspector Aberline
unigateman 2 years ago
will be the closest we will ever get to solving the puzzle
unigateman 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
abberline was under the impression that the ripper was a foreign barber/surgeon from russia or poland. These types of men had experience in minor surgery but were employed as hairdressers in 1880s London. Polish George Chapman who eventually turned out to be a serial poisoner was one of his suspects but there was another man who he strongly suspected whom he confused with chapman because they looked alike. Abberline wasnt even certain of his name but this man was russian and used aliases.
bunterx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Donald Mcormack in 59 proposed that this man was Alexander Pedachenko who was also know as Count Luiskovo and Vassily Konovalov. He was a russian trained as a surgeon and employed in London 1888 in Walworth at a surgery. He was a master of disguise and dressed as a woman to evade capture. Abberlines suspect was really this man and not george chapman. the source of this theory was the bulletin of the Czarist secret police, which advised all officers that Konovalov had died in an asylum.
bunterx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Mcormacks claims that the canonical ripper victims all attended a clinic in Walworth where Konovalov worked for a DR Williams. Each of them had links with this area. It could explain why they all went willingingly with this man. He claims hhe worked with 2 others - a women called wimberg and a man called Levitski who acted as look out. The cry of "lipski" by the ripper suspect to a 2nd man at the stride killing when israel schwartz disturbed the murder could easily have been "Levitski" ....
bunterx 2 years ago
jack the ripper must've been lazy then if he killed them all within 1 mile
RelaxYouliveLonger 3 years ago
dicusting but fascinating
missjackson58 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i think all fat fucken women should be kill this way. all of them..all
imthefrogman 3 years ago
fuck you piece of shit !! hope u rot you cunt
JoeRUGBY10 3 years ago
maybe they were not the preetiest or even the nicest women in the world but they hardly deserved to be sliced open like pieces of raw meat to presented like fish in a tank. He was a sick, twisted vile
human being and I think underneath he knew just how ugly he was so much darkness. so please dont mock the dead
gfahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh 3 years ago 11
Annie Chapman was the only victim who was overweight, and Mary Jane Kelly was described as buxom.
Also, have you any respect for women? Not every woman can be a supermodel and, what's more, women also have feelings. None of these women deserved to be killed; they were living on the margins, they were desperate to survive by any means, they were worn down by poverty...
Have some courtesy and some compassion for them.
diddims 2 years ago 15
@diddims compassion for a hooker,i doubt you would show some for the modern ones,pal.
akatsukicloak 1 year ago
@akatsukicloak Actually I do, if you must know; they're still human.
diddims 1 year ago
@diddims Yeah sorry for that long awaited reply,i figured being right and remaining right is two different things. So im going to tell you this. Yes those woman were humans and when it comes the modern ages,we can say only that a person can choose the sort of life he wants to live. If you bring yourself to be ruined by fate and controlled by your genes. Then you have the result,you can see the obvious from the people you obtained your genetic information (Parents etc)
akatsukicloak 1 year ago
@akatsukicloak See, I don't think many people here would cry if a serial killer decided to target cruel, snide, self impressed jerks(like you). But we would still be sad for the loss of life. If we start deciding what kind of people wouldn't be missed, you might not like the outcome.
lollipopfop 10 months ago
Sorry,but i don't think that by judging someone you will show yourself of better ethics or come out morally better. Rather than to provide a clean argument. Have a nice day.
akatsukicloak 10 months ago
@imthefrogman
You MONSTER!!!!!!
Let's imagine a serial killer brutallly murders five MEN in this way!! You wouldn't be saying that if that happened!!!!!!
Kaylara555 1 year ago
@Kaylara555 yes i would. kill the men too
imthefrogman 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
jack:FACK YOU!!
wiejo23 3 years ago
so they never caught the guy ?
bavly6 3 years ago 2
nope
OrionAssante 3 years ago 3
nope ...
u don't know Jack, The Ripper story ?
kathybones 3 years ago 3
Why Jack Why do u have to do this ='(
SHIRAIKOTAROU177 3 years ago 2
can i get a suuary? i dont understand everything because im from germany..
MinutestoMidnight183 3 years ago
interesting so much information
TwistedGold0 3 years ago 12
love these serial killer programs, there so interesting.
vivimaze 4 years ago 17
i know but jacks dead right
wwenumberonefanboy 3 years ago
well yh
vivimaze 3 years ago
its been about 200 years, of course.
jgjghgh 3 years ago
120 years this year (2008) actually. :)
Aerien 3 years ago 5
Dunno :P
jgjghgh 3 years ago