Having just listened to these clips I really dont like the use of musical instruments.Very gimmicky. The singing was so wonderful in the Crucible revivial that I was fully expecting this lauded version to be as good or even better but its not. I just wish the Crucible version could have a cast album.
This was a just a God-awful revival. I know seasoned Broadway professionals who came out just shaking their heads in disbelief. It doesn't surprise me at all the Sonheim LOVED this version because there aren't any distractions to get in the way of his music and lyrics (like the famous Boris Aronson set and the Michael Bennett choreography -- including the famous "Tick Tock" number that is always the first to be jettisoned yet is absolutely integral to understanding Bobby's character.)
There needs to be a channel devoted entirely to live theater that shows video taped and filmed shows from Broadway, off Broadway and off off Broadway as well as professional theaters from around the world. It should also include operas, ballets and concerts. Also there should be reality shows devoted to the theater and have commercials so royalties can be paid. I dub it the Theater Network!
What I absolutely love about Sondheim is the terror (as an actor and singer) of wondering if you can rise to the challenge of his wry twists and turns.....truly daunting.
I have to say after getting this from the library i have fallen in love with this musical, for someone as brilliant as sondheim to take something like marriage and relationships and make a musical is amazing to me, and i've never seen it done quite like this, all of the people in the cast are amazingly talented, they work effortlessly well together, and the casting of the lead was great, raul esparza is the epitome of a handsome, humorous bachelor
I just wasted $18 watching mainly TV actors destroy this musical along with the NY Phil. Raul Esparza is the Bobby for all time, and this cast and orchestration is perfect.
OMG Thank you! I never knew what Company was about, but after seeing Side by Side performed during the Tony's on Sunday, I've wanted to see it like crazy! So hard to do when you live in the middle of nowhere Illinois. Having it on youtube makes me so happy! I love the 21st century :)
My school is putting this show together next year. Its pretty likey will get the lead Robert :) so excited. Thank you for posting this I can practice and see how I have to portray the character.
"Hi, this is Steve. Yes, today is my birthday, and yes, you may leave a message about how happy YOU are that I'm turning 81. And whatever you're calling about, the answer is yes."
I thought watching the whole thing this afternoon would satisfy me, but I keep coming back to it again and again. Cannot wait to see it in April with NPH and Stephen Colbert as Harry!
In 1970 I was lucky to see the Dean Jones version of company. That year I took my first trip to NY to see Fiddler as part of our high school drama group and Hal Prince himself gave us a tour of the set, then, a crazy, dark and long haired man ran down the isle and joined him in the discussion, it was Sondheim. Who not only took questions from us but also asked many questions of us. That was a great day.
I came so close to becoming a New Yorker that day.
In 1970 I was lucky to see the Dean Jones version of company. That year I took my first trip to NY to see Fiddler as part of out high school drama group and Hal Prince himself gave us a tour of the set, then, a crasy, dark and long haired man ran down the isle and joined him in the discussion, it was Sondheim. Who not only took questions from us but also asked many questions of us. That was a great day.
I came so close to becoming a New Yorker that day.
Well, not to discount how much better this works than it has any right to, it DOES do away with one fabulous parts of the original: Jonathan Tunick's great (GREAT!) orchestrations. They really should not be dispensed with in such a cavalier fashion.
@nickAtlanta All professional musicians know how to play piano. Many also play some other instrument. If not, they all ready music so they have an easier time learning.
Sondeheim prefers the original cast for a reason. I agree as much these guys and girls do a good job. The original was just more raw, less bland, less whiny and so much more emotive
This is one of my favorite musicals of all time, however, in this particular production, i feel as if the ensemble based pit detracts from the work. I thoguht that the Sweeney Todd revival did fantastically with this method but i feel as if Company requires the actors full emotional range and focus, which is disturbed by their respective instruments. Anywhoozle, this is most definatly one of the greatest musicals of all time and always a joy to watch.
I'm not trying to mean or anything (and ordinarily I wouldn't say anything of this nature, but it's been on my mind for a while) but is anybody else a little weirded out by the man who play's Paul and his lack of lips.
YUP... Best of the BEST! My all time FAV musical... too. Sondeim and the 1970s... in which I WAS... WAS! ... "BobbieBuuhbieBobbieBaby!" Did you hear me say ME! ?
Yup. Great years, FULL of love, and very very little rancor... none of that icky-stuff inside of me, anyhow. -- GLAD I did everything I did! NO. Regrets. - Hugs, Johnny.
that song was fun, and my bf and i always say, "barcelona" now when we hear someone say "where ya goin?" hahaha but, the trio g/f song was crazy hard! we actually did "doo-doo's" instead of using an instrument, as most do.
The first time I saw this play was in 2004 in Los Angeles.... it was magical. I met Deborah Gibson, Richard Kline from Threes Company and Judith Light...I'll never forget this play and love it forever.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Please! Doyle started this crap of having singers play instruments (or appearing to do so.; they are lipsynching to recordings) to save money by eliminating the orchestra. He has already ruined Sweeny, Company, and all the other Sondheim musicals he's directed. I'm amazed that Sondheim allows this, since he always said he was so incredibly sensitive to hearing his innermost feelings, which he expressed in his lyrics and music, every opening night or any revival. Glad Doyle spared the Met!.
1) Sondheim LOVES this version of company because of all the amazing intricacies.
2) they arent lip syncing
3) Sondheim is very supportive of actors playing instruments, in fact when he wrote night music he intended that all of the major characters play instruments.
I agree with you that it wasnt right for Sweeny, but this is seen as one of the best productions of Company ever
@jimjimmyjames59 how can a trend that -at least for the greater part of the audience- never became a hughe hit, ever pass??? For 80% of the musical-loving audience, most sondheim shows are still new... Let's wait for the whole world getting to know sondheim before saying ANYTHING he ever wrote can be passed!
"...Raul, we'll music at dinner. We'll play some Sondheim for you. Even though the sound will be thinner. Just be the three of us, slumbing the orchestra..."
Wikipedia has a good summary. It's about Bobby, who's single and has lots of married friends. It's his birthday and he isn't sure whether he wants to be married or stay a bachelor.
He flashes back to remember his friends and the time he has spent with them.
I like both versions of this show a lot. Raul Esparza was great in this part and so were Dean Jones/Larry Kert as well. It's just different but I think this worked very well for the kind of show it is. I enjoy both versions very much so :)
I think it lacks on dynanmic in the music why couldn't they do it oldschool with an orchestra in an orchestra pit with conducter and the actors on the stage?
Because it was the PBS special where they didn't do the actual show, they did a mock version of the show, they actual cut out some dialogue and numbers... it was for TV so they shorted it. They actual showed off how amazing these actors and actresses are. They play multiple instruments and can be amazing as they are! :D just to let you know I am a big fan of the show, hoped you enjoyed
It's not because it was a PBS special. This is just how the revival was done because John Doyle was doing it this way just like his revival of Sweeney Todd. They may have cut things because of PBS but the instrument and the scarce set is because of the direction
Very well done revival. These are very talented actors/singers who can play their instruments as well. I do have to admit I do miss a few instruments in the original show. They all did a wonderful job. I did like Dean Jones playing Bobby a bit better.
Have always loved this show. But never knew how this revival spun it. The performers doubling up as musicians seems to lend something to the central idea of connexions in a life! Works really well!..
I just played in the pit for the Tallahassee Little Theatres performance of this and, honestly, they pulled off a better performance. From singing to acting to staging: they pulled out all the stops and really made the characters speak their feelings. Dont get me wrong, Boyles revivals are awesome!, but you just don't get the some connection between the cast as in doing it with a pit. Thanks for posting this!
A fellow pit player! Well, I suppose you can't call me a proper player, since I've only done my own high school's productions, but I know how you feel. I still like to claim that our high school's production of The Music Man was better than any other performance I've seen, even though I know that's only because I saw it so many times during rehearsals, it grew on me and latched on tight.
Both revivals are great. The sound of Sweeney is amazing, but I don't think it works as well visually as Company does as far as the instruments on stage. Sweeney is really more of an archetypal epic affair, which aids itself to a more cinematic display. Company is very artistic, so it works with the instruments. I really don't like the original cast recording of Company, this is much better.
I agree that this concept works so much better for Company than it did for Sweeney. The instruments have definite symbolic significance. The fact that Company is more of a plotless, concept show works with the abstract design. This is one of my favorite productions I've seen on Broadway in a very long time.
I happen to disagree. You lose the elements of dance with this instrumental. Side by Side by Side seemed more charming with the little tap numbers added in. Taking out Tick Tock just killed it for me.
And replacing the "doo doos" with saxophones in You Could Drive a Person Crazy irks me. You lose the entire essence of it being an "Andrews Sisters" inspired number. It just becomes a simple trio.
Sweeney Todd worked on so many levels. The background of the revival was just genius. You could see
the inhabitants of a mental hospital putting on a show like that. It made sense. This was just a bunch of people singing and playing instruments for no apparent. Sweeney Todd was people performing that musical.
I've never seen that version of Sweeny, but it sounds like great. It did work for Man of La Mancha. I have just been formally introduced to company, both versions and I agree with you, especially about the "doo doos." I am not familiar with Tick Tock.
Donna McKechnie's dance, choreographed by Michael Bennett, was placed in front of Barcelona and after Poor Baby in the original production.
I believe the version of a 51 or 53(!) year old Donna McKechnie at the reunion concert is somewhere on youtube. It's an amazing dance, however, no one else really has the caliber to do it nowadays.
Ugh, I hate the whole idea of having the cast play the instruments. It just doesn't make any sense! What is the advantage of doing it that way? Sure, it's impressive that these people can sing and play and the same time, but I think that it really takes away from their acting performances. Whatevs, though. It's still Sondheim, and I still love it!
Yeah, it's weird. But I think a Sondheim musical where this would work especially well would be A Little Night Music. Sondheim said that originally, he was going to have each character's vocal part represent an instrument, but he eventually decided that was too pretentious. If they played the instruments, though, it would make sense! And one character already has to play the cello...
Usually I agree with you, John Doyle is an idiot. It does not work for Mack and Mabel or Sweeney Todd. Oddly enough, it does work for Company, in my opinion.
Yes this was very similar to the touring production of sweeney todd. I think sometimes it does look a bit awkward for the actors, especially when walking around. It can still be rewarding though, it just requires a bit more effort on the audience's part.
I think it works pretty well for this. I love this production. The only issue I have is the constant walking around and marching in circles. That's what's distracting to me. Sit still for goodness sake!
Yeah, but if you think about it, that's the point. I think the director was trying to create that feeling of "circling, circling, circling, just sit down won't you!"
I noticed that as well. I saw it live and It's a bit different.I think that it has to be this tapping of the show..I'm guessing maybe they wanted to tone it down so you could see that all of this taking place in Bobbys' head.
John Doyle originally used this method (mind you, he wasn't the first) due to budget; he could not afford to higher an orchestra, so he hired actors who were also musicians and combined the 'roles'.
He has since staged many other productions using the actor-musician method. In this way, he strips musical theatre down to its core, that is telling a story with music. Actors are also able to perform their characters through their instruments, giving them another dimension.
In Company the method enforces the message of 'company', of supporting each other. There are also small details that show the couples' relationships. In 'The Little Things You Do Together' Sarah & Harry 'fight' as they play opposing lines on flute and trumpet. Susan & Peter play piano. David & Jenny play strings. Amy & Paul play trumpet. Joanne only playing percussion shows how little she plays in her marriage. The wives back up their husbands when they sing their solos in 'Sorry-Grateful'.
I know am writing a lot, but I find the actor-musician method fascinating. As I said, there are little throughout the show (who plays, what instrument/line they play) that gives further insight in the characters and their relationships. I think the point is driven home at the end of 'What Would We Do Without You', as the couples compliment each others' solos but Bobby plays alone. How tragic is it that all these couples can make beautiful music together, but Bobby has no one to play with.
Well, because it's a very conceptual...concept. It worked in Company because of the setting - it takes place in Bobby's mind. It has no plot. There's no real honest scenery or anything to look at. In Sweeney, it's a bit different. Partially because it's timeperiod, but mostly because it has a plot, and it doesn't make sense to me. It's hard to imagine the setting when you're focused on the accordion. Plus, with this set-up you have to strip down the orchestra to just what it needs to sound...
...close to full. In Sweeney, the orchestra needs to have a very complete sound to pull off the horror-ishness about it. That's why I love the movie; they augment the orchestra so large that it immerses you into the entire thing. While some of Doyle's direction worked in Sweeney, he was immensely more successful using the same style for Company, mostly just because it is more conceptual and that is almost the way it was meant to be directed.
Then again, I was not a fan of the Hal Prince production because I felt it was a little too over- exaggerated. But understand that John's production was to take place in Tobias' mind.
See, it's hard to grasp that it takes place in Toby's mind if A) Toby wasn't in every scene, B) you go from the movie/original production to the revival. Whereas Company is written from Bobby's head, so there's no other way to do it, really.
Having just listened to these clips I really dont like the use of musical instruments.Very gimmicky. The singing was so wonderful in the Crucible revivial that I was fully expecting this lauded version to be as good or even better but its not. I just wish the Crucible version could have a cast album.
romangirl88 1 month ago
The Daniel Evans version at the Crucible is outstanding.
romangirl88 1 month ago
I went to see this at the Crucible on Wednesday :D
Jabbermouthrulz 1 month ago
@Jabbermouthrulz lol same
MrJoseph554 1 month ago
I love this version, the cast are so unbelievably talented.
GoingUpsideDown 1 month ago
This was a just a God-awful revival. I know seasoned Broadway professionals who came out just shaking their heads in disbelief. It doesn't surprise me at all the Sonheim LOVED this version because there aren't any distractions to get in the way of his music and lyrics (like the famous Boris Aronson set and the Michael Bennett choreography -- including the famous "Tick Tock" number that is always the first to be jettisoned yet is absolutely integral to understanding Bobby's character.)
sporran564 3 months ago
I love you for this. Think you for posting this.
Kaizykat 3 months ago
dear Mr. Cowles, Thank you so very much for posting this.I agree,in my top 5 favorite musicals of all time! I have watched it 7 times.Thank you!!
TheWhatev33 4 months ago
There needs to be a channel devoted entirely to live theater that shows video taped and filmed shows from Broadway, off Broadway and off off Broadway as well as professional theaters from around the world. It should also include operas, ballets and concerts. Also there should be reality shows devoted to the theater and have commercials so royalties can be paid. I dub it the Theater Network!
johnyzero2000 5 months ago 4
@johnyzero2000 I would seriously pledge my life to making the Theatre Network happen.
ellenrocksyourworld 3 months ago
I was in "Into the woods n assassins n both show as I sang I was so scarred but excited at the same time
9andabovge 5 months ago
Gotta love these ultra modern chord changes.
egyptianminor 5 months ago
@egyptianminor The best tunes of the whole musical are here in the opening, and you gotta love Barbara Walsh and Kelly Jean Grant - both so hot.
egyptianminor 3 months ago
What I absolutely love about Sondheim is the terror (as an actor and singer) of wondering if you can rise to the challenge of his wry twists and turns.....truly daunting.
ravenofno 5 months ago
I have to say after getting this from the library i have fallen in love with this musical, for someone as brilliant as sondheim to take something like marriage and relationships and make a musical is amazing to me, and i've never seen it done quite like this, all of the people in the cast are amazingly talented, they work effortlessly well together, and the casting of the lead was great, raul esparza is the epitome of a handsome, humorous bachelor
allenepinder 6 months ago
So, did they teach the actors to play instruments?
Akredhead 7 months ago
I just wasted $18 watching mainly TV actors destroy this musical along with the NY Phil. Raul Esparza is the Bobby for all time, and this cast and orchestration is perfect.
pianodude1971 7 months ago
@pianodude1971 You didn't like it? I loved the version with Neil. Still, this version is my favourite.
InspectorKaramazov 7 months ago
I just saw the recorded version of this with Neil Patrick Harris! Company=new obsession :D
deepswimms 7 months ago 4
OMG Thank you! I never knew what Company was about, but after seeing Side by Side performed during the Tony's on Sunday, I've wanted to see it like crazy! So hard to do when you live in the middle of nowhere Illinois. Having it on youtube makes me so happy! I love the 21st century :)
Exayevie 7 months ago
My school is putting this show together next year. Its pretty likey will get the lead Robert :) so excited. Thank you for posting this I can practice and see how I have to portray the character.
JoseRomeroSING 9 months ago
"Hi, this is Steve. Yes, today is my birthday, and yes, you may leave a message about how happy YOU are that I'm turning 81. And whatever you're calling about, the answer is yes."
Happy 81st birthday Stephen.
WillScarlet16 10 months ago 17
I thought watching the whole thing this afternoon would satisfy me, but I keep coming back to it again and again. Cannot wait to see it in April with NPH and Stephen Colbert as Harry!
blikely9 11 months ago 4
i don't like this bobby...too smug and a bit annoying ha
ginoseast123 11 months ago
@ginoseast123 what do you mean by smug and a bit annoying. he is thebest bobby. though you are entitled to ypur own opinion
horerfandod3 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks for posting really enjoy it from London West End.
RoyTanUK 11 months ago
Thanks for posting really enjoy it from London West End.
RoyTanUK 11 months ago
at 4:20 that lady sounds like sue salvester from glee. i love it, its awseom!
phantomsonlylove 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Factual Asian brides are there **busizz4me.info**
nawindsor 1 year ago
In 1970 I was lucky to see the Dean Jones version of company. That year I took my first trip to NY to see Fiddler as part of our high school drama group and Hal Prince himself gave us a tour of the set, then, a crazy, dark and long haired man ran down the isle and joined him in the discussion, it was Sondheim. Who not only took questions from us but also asked many questions of us. That was a great day.
I came so close to becoming a New Yorker that day.
ddd1953 1 year ago
In 1970 I was lucky to see the Dean Jones version of company. That year I took my first trip to NY to see Fiddler as part of out high school drama group and Hal Prince himself gave us a tour of the set, then, a crasy, dark and long haired man ran down the isle and joined him in the discussion, it was Sondheim. Who not only took questions from us but also asked many questions of us. That was a great day.
I came so close to becoming a New Yorker that day.
ddd1953 1 year ago
Best intro song ever...
spudster007 1 year ago
Well, not to discount how much better this works than it has any right to, it DOES do away with one fabulous parts of the original: Jonathan Tunick's great (GREAT!) orchestrations. They really should not be dispensed with in such a cavalier fashion.
Marg002 1 year ago
Be ready Asian women online lushfmlk.info
wendioiso 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Your total marriage solution partner mworld5.info
cailinjoel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Marginal value naughty Russian ladies here gettop5.info
AlexisSirscu 1 year ago
How in the world did they find instrumentalists who could not only sing, but act, too? This is brilliant!
nickAtlanta 1 year ago 13
@nickAtlanta All professional musicians know how to play piano. Many also play some other instrument. If not, they all ready music so they have an easier time learning.
MsLazyllama101 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great Asian women for you ***lushfmlk.info***
cristyalax 1 year ago
Sondeheim prefers the original cast for a reason. I agree as much these guys and girls do a good job. The original was just more raw, less bland, less whiny and so much more emotive
jamieh1974 1 year ago
my drama class is doing this musical this year. oh boy i love this opening!
phantomsonlylove 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Real profiles and thousands of Russian women gettop5.info
carlyqcarmesq18 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
best Asian women #lushfmlk.info#
umayanarosy 1 year ago
i love this Sondheim production this was one of the best hes done and most of his plays are weird but this one was really good
jjrockyoursocks 1 year ago
this is disgustingly brilliant
hazzabazza321 1 year ago 2
How to choose a fave Sondheim - I can't - but "Being Alive" still brings me to tears.
eleanor2012 1 year ago
I LOVE THIS MUSICAL!!!!!!!!!!!!! But I think the Broadway soundtrack sounds better
lizzypdotpi 1 year ago
Marta, a drag Cher impersonator...? Meaning when she speaks? We barely get to hear her sing solo in this number. I can't help loving her personally.
kaos1156 1 year ago
This is one of my favorite musicals of all time, however, in this particular production, i feel as if the ensemble based pit detracts from the work. I thoguht that the Sweeney Todd revival did fantastically with this method but i feel as if Company requires the actors full emotional range and focus, which is disturbed by their respective instruments. Anywhoozle, this is most definatly one of the greatest musicals of all time and always a joy to watch.
teplin444 1 year ago
I love Marta...
futurestarish 1 year ago
I'm not trying to mean or anything (and ordinarily I wouldn't say anything of this nature, but it's been on my mind for a while) but is anybody else a little weirded out by the man who play's Paul and his lack of lips.
Straw2daberry 1 year ago
I am so the Bobby of all my friends :)
Straw2daberry 1 year ago 3
@Straw2daberry or the Mark of all of my friends, two character's at the center of all of these other people that surround them
skitsokity 1 year ago
this is awesome and thanks for uploading!
RentandWicked 1 year ago
YUP... Best of the BEST! My all time FAV musical... too. Sondeim and the 1970s... in which I WAS... WAS! ... "BobbieBuuhbieBobbieBaby!" Did you hear me say ME! ?
Yup. Great years, FULL of love, and very very little rancor... none of that icky-stuff inside of me, anyhow. -- GLAD I did everything I did! NO. Regrets. - Hugs, Johnny.
jonycuddlesgert 1 year ago
very nice i really love this song
dearkakana 1 year ago
I'm sorry, but this Marta is just awful. She sounds like a drag Cher impersonator.
maggiepower 1 year ago
It was enough that I sent away for this dvd, not needing to see it often, just knowing I had it.
linkcharmer 1 year ago
omg hear the overtones especially at 1.11 for a few seconds.
MLeeemily 1 year ago
I'm doing an (slightly simplified) amateur version in Dutch tomorrow (playing Harry and Paul)!
fireballfrenzy 1 year ago
I never thought anyone could. Bravo, Barbara!!!!!!!!!
lf1234 1 year ago
My favorite Sondheim show...ever!
stapt1 1 year ago
I think this production is fantastic! I'm not a huge Raul Esparza fan though.
SeanIsTheFizz 1 year ago
Some purists may gripe about the minimalist orchestrations, but with Company it actually works.
I used to think Company was Sondheim's sellout piece. On the OBC he mostly sounds like he's trying to hard to be hip.
I never realized how great the opening tune was until all that 70s noise was stripped down.
WillScarlet16 1 year ago
i was April at Sacramento State's version of this. really fun, but hard ass music!
shooterandwinniesmom 2 years ago 5
thats so cool! that means you got to sing barcalona i love that song!
crazymonkeegrrl666 1 year ago
that song was fun, and my bf and i always say, "barcelona" now when we hear someone say "where ya goin?" hahaha but, the trio g/f song was crazy hard! we actually did "doo-doo's" instead of using an instrument, as most do.
shooterandwinniesmom 1 year ago
@shooterandwinniesmom The city or the planet?
blithium 1 year ago
@shooterandwinniesmom The city or the planet?
blithium 1 year ago
Barbara Walsh seems to channel Elaine Stritch.
lf1234 2 years ago
The first time I saw this play was in 2004 in Los Angeles.... it was magical. I met Deborah Gibson, Richard Kline from Threes Company and Judith Light...I'll never forget this play and love it forever.
officialbriangibson 2 years ago
Can someone please tell me where can I download this play ?
franko3110 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Please! Doyle started this crap of having singers play instruments (or appearing to do so.; they are lipsynching to recordings) to save money by eliminating the orchestra. He has already ruined Sweeny, Company, and all the other Sondheim musicals he's directed. I'm amazed that Sondheim allows this, since he always said he was so incredibly sensitive to hearing his innermost feelings, which he expressed in his lyrics and music, every opening night or any revival. Glad Doyle spared the Met!.
11777766 2 years ago
@11777766
So a few things before you make that statement:
1) Sondheim LOVES this version of company because of all the amazing intricacies.
2) they arent lip syncing
3) Sondheim is very supportive of actors playing instruments, in fact when he wrote night music he intended that all of the major characters play instruments.
I agree with you that it wasnt right for Sweeny, but this is seen as one of the best productions of Company ever
BroadwayVBtime 2 years ago 62
Here here! Thank you for saying that!
This version transformed from a hater of musicals into a lover. I cannot stop watching this. Bravo to Doyle and Sondheim! Esparza is great, too. Man.
tlengland2007 2 years ago 4
@BroadwayVBtime
I can understand that. But after 3 major musical revivals (that I know of) with actors playing instruments, please tell me that the trend has passed.
jimjimmyjames59 1 year ago
@jimjimmyjames59 how can a trend that -at least for the greater part of the audience- never became a hughe hit, ever pass??? For 80% of the musical-loving audience, most sondheim shows are still new... Let's wait for the whole world getting to know sondheim before saying ANYTHING he ever wrote can be passed!
robbertstoop 1 year ago
@BroadwayVBtime and yet its only fredrick alone with his cello...how sad haha
sixstringhero20 9 months ago
@sixstringhero20 Nooo, not fredrick! Henrik! ;)
fflorol 9 months ago
I presume your name is a reference to the god-awful musical 1776. That explains a lot.
StrewthMcGinty1 2 years ago 2
'Bobby come and see my new Cello, let me park it right over here...."
mdpr3 2 years ago 7
"...Raul, we'll music at dinner. We'll play some Sondheim for you. Even though the sound will be thinner. Just be the three of us, slumbing the orchestra..."
Capricaquarius89 2 years ago
I think David Hyde Pierce is terrific, but I was really hoping that Raul Esparza would win the Tony for "Company"
Capricaquarius89 2 years ago
i am always overwhelmed by how much talent is on that little stage. singers and orchestra all in one!
0this1is2madness3 2 years ago 4
Dude, disable your ratings.
lustertheleopard 2 years ago
can someone tell me what the musical is about
bandKIWI097 2 years ago
Wikipedia has a good summary. It's about Bobby, who's single and has lots of married friends. It's his birthday and he isn't sure whether he wants to be married or stay a bachelor.
He flashes back to remember his friends and the time he has spent with them.
OzBuckBear 2 years ago
It is about couples, their relationships and what love means
artwarkam 2 years ago
I like both versions of this show a lot. Raul Esparza was great in this part and so were Dean Jones/Larry Kert as well. It's just different but I think this worked very well for the kind of show it is. I enjoy both versions very much so :)
WarCraftPwns 2 years ago
I definitely agree with you. They are both great!
ebergsven 2 years ago
This revival was so self-indulgent.
littlepipandcowbell 2 years ago
I think it lacks on dynanmic in the music why couldn't they do it oldschool with an orchestra in an orchestra pit with conducter and the actors on the stage?
TheBohemianSpirit 2 years ago
Because it was the PBS special where they didn't do the actual show, they did a mock version of the show, they actual cut out some dialogue and numbers... it was for TV so they shorted it. They actual showed off how amazing these actors and actresses are. They play multiple instruments and can be amazing as they are! :D just to let you know I am a big fan of the show, hoped you enjoyed
ebergsven 2 years ago
It's not because it was a PBS special. This is just how the revival was done because John Doyle was doing it this way just like his revival of Sweeney Todd. They may have cut things because of PBS but the instrument and the scarce set is because of the direction
WarCraftPwns 2 years ago
Learn what you're talking about.
zisel2 2 years ago
Because that would have made it far less interesting and impressive.
BroadwayVBtime 2 years ago
Thank you so much for posting this. One of my favorite musicals.
bakedsanta 2 years ago
Not sure how I feel about the idea of the actors playing the instruments to tell you the truth seems a bit cheesy but who knows maybe I'll like it.
RichieEastside 2 years ago
I wanna do this show SOOO bad.
peep1131 2 years ago 4
I kinda want to marry Raul...
PicturesOnSilence1 2 years ago 12
What'd ya wanna get married for?
RickvanVeldhuizen 2 years ago 4
So then we can get a divorce to keep the marriage stronger =D
crazyking1325 2 years ago
Comment removed
dean92p 2 years ago
thank you for uploading this!
Chung85909 2 years ago
Very well done revival. These are very talented actors/singers who can play their instruments as well. I do have to admit I do miss a few instruments in the original show. They all did a wonderful job. I did like Dean Jones playing Bobby a bit better.
covercalls 2 years ago
I like this show more than the original, just because the instrumentation is IMO better done, and the actors are IMO better
RickvanVeldhuizen 2 years ago
THANK YOU SO MUCH!
castellvell 2 years ago
Have always loved this show. But never knew how this revival spun it. The performers doubling up as musicians seems to lend something to the central idea of connexions in a life! Works really well!..
jimdivax 2 years ago
I just played in the pit for the Tallahassee Little Theatres performance of this and, honestly, they pulled off a better performance. From singing to acting to staging: they pulled out all the stops and really made the characters speak their feelings. Dont get me wrong, Boyles revivals are awesome!, but you just don't get the some connection between the cast as in doing it with a pit. Thanks for posting this!
exroaminbone 2 years ago
A fellow pit player! Well, I suppose you can't call me a proper player, since I've only done my own high school's productions, but I know how you feel. I still like to claim that our high school's production of The Music Man was better than any other performance I've seen, even though I know that's only because I saw it so many times during rehearsals, it grew on me and latched on tight.
Slotheye 2 years ago
Oh man. This show is amazing.
waitforthecrash 2 years ago 3
Both revivals are great. The sound of Sweeney is amazing, but I don't think it works as well visually as Company does as far as the instruments on stage. Sweeney is really more of an archetypal epic affair, which aids itself to a more cinematic display. Company is very artistic, so it works with the instruments. I really don't like the original cast recording of Company, this is much better.
In conclusion, screw dance numbers.
eagler4040 2 years ago 32
@eagler4040 I could not agree with you more.
mysterywhiteboy41 1 year ago
so amazing. so much talent on one stage.
thanks for uploading it. :)
lettersx2you 2 years ago 2
I agree that this concept works so much better for Company than it did for Sweeney. The instruments have definite symbolic significance. The fact that Company is more of a plotless, concept show works with the abstract design. This is one of my favorite productions I've seen on Broadway in a very long time.
tellmewhatsahappenin 3 years ago 2
I happen to disagree. You lose the elements of dance with this instrumental. Side by Side by Side seemed more charming with the little tap numbers added in. Taking out Tick Tock just killed it for me.
And replacing the "doo doos" with saxophones in You Could Drive a Person Crazy irks me. You lose the entire essence of it being an "Andrews Sisters" inspired number. It just becomes a simple trio.
Sweeney Todd worked on so many levels. The background of the revival was just genius. You could see
doggys235 3 years ago
Well, in You Could Drive a Person Crazy, the doo doos were obviously imitating saxes...
And I personally think that the revival of Sweeney was an uninspired mess.
Mind, we;re all entitled to our own opinions :)
yelanates 2 years ago 2
the inhabitants of a mental hospital putting on a show like that. It made sense. This was just a bunch of people singing and playing instruments for no apparent. Sweeney Todd was people performing that musical.
doggys235 3 years ago
I've never seen that version of Sweeny, but it sounds like great. It did work for Man of La Mancha. I have just been formally introduced to company, both versions and I agree with you, especially about the "doo doos." I am not familiar with Tick Tock.
blattman13 3 years ago
Donna McKechnie's dance, choreographed by Michael Bennett, was placed in front of Barcelona and after Poor Baby in the original production.
I believe the version of a 51 or 53(!) year old Donna McKechnie at the reunion concert is somewhere on youtube. It's an amazing dance, however, no one else really has the caliber to do it nowadays.
doggys235 3 years ago
"Sorry, just ignore this phone call. Oh god, you'll never believe what I just did..." lol
Drego642 3 years ago 2
What theater is this at?
It's looks like Circle in the Square but I can't remeber
broadwayfan3 3 years ago
umm ... it's actually the first thing said in the video, how about hitting "play"?
orsino05 3 years ago
Whoops...I skiped the beginning and just went straight to the first song
broadwayfan3 3 years ago
Ugh, I hate the whole idea of having the cast play the instruments. It just doesn't make any sense! What is the advantage of doing it that way? Sure, it's impressive that these people can sing and play and the same time, but I think that it really takes away from their acting performances. Whatevs, though. It's still Sondheim, and I still love it!
BirdDogg34 3 years ago
Yeah, it's weird. But I think a Sondheim musical where this would work especially well would be A Little Night Music. Sondheim said that originally, he was going to have each character's vocal part represent an instrument, but he eventually decided that was too pretentious. If they played the instruments, though, it would make sense! And one character already has to play the cello...
KatherineXIX 3 years ago
Usually I agree with you, John Doyle is an idiot. It does not work for Mack and Mabel or Sweeney Todd. Oddly enough, it does work for Company, in my opinion.
yelanates 3 years ago 2
Yes this was very similar to the touring production of sweeney todd. I think sometimes it does look a bit awkward for the actors, especially when walking around. It can still be rewarding though, it just requires a bit more effort on the audience's part.
mikep300 3 years ago
I think it works pretty well for this. I love this production. The only issue I have is the constant walking around and marching in circles. That's what's distracting to me. Sit still for goodness sake!
FilesOfWrye 3 years ago
Yeah, but if you think about it, that's the point. I think the director was trying to create that feeling of "circling, circling, circling, just sit down won't you!"
Truthspark 2 years ago
Raul's expression at 1:54 is priceless. I love it.
MichaelCrawfordsFan 3 years ago
Is this on DVD? I just got the CD with Raul in it tonight. It sounds great. Its amazing.
MichaelCrawfordsFan 3 years ago
dvd on amazon of wholw show - great.
Edinburgh74 3 years ago
i loved reading all the comments and opinions on this show! :D
littledotte 3 years ago 2
this is such a great performance! thanks so much for uploading it!!!!
littledotte 3 years ago
LMAO, it's also an episode of "Great Performances".
yelanates 3 years ago
This is very, very, very, very good.
Scott89119 3 years ago
I love this revival of company. I think it is just cause I am between theater and music(instrumental). I LOVE THIS!!!!!!!
Oathkeeper1992 3 years ago
love sondheim!
Fave song from this musical has to be "You could drive a person crazy"
AMAZING!
MushroomLake 3 years ago
As much as I love the show, I have to say that this particular revival seemed to lack energy.
littlepipandcowbell 3 years ago
I noticed that as well. I saw it live and It's a bit different.I think that it has to be this tapping of the show..I'm guessing maybe they wanted to tone it down so you could see that all of this taking place in Bobbys' head.
invisiblegy15 3 years ago
I still don't get the instruments...are they actually playing?
britriv 3 years ago 2
Yes of course they are actually playing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! It is a concept show.
BillyCowles 3 years ago 3
So why does John Doyle use the actors/musician method? Not I'm against it, I just want to know.
Hasselhoffhater 3 years ago
I'm not really sure why he has a fascination with actors with instruments, but i like it. it is a cool way of presenting the show!
BillyCowles 3 years ago
Well I think there should be more then being a cool way to presenting a show.
Hasselhoffhater 3 years ago
John Doyle originally used this method (mind you, he wasn't the first) due to budget; he could not afford to higher an orchestra, so he hired actors who were also musicians and combined the 'roles'.
He has since staged many other productions using the actor-musician method. In this way, he strips musical theatre down to its core, that is telling a story with music. Actors are also able to perform their characters through their instruments, giving them another dimension.
blackbelt360 3 years ago
In Company the method enforces the message of 'company', of supporting each other. There are also small details that show the couples' relationships. In 'The Little Things You Do Together' Sarah & Harry 'fight' as they play opposing lines on flute and trumpet. Susan & Peter play piano. David & Jenny play strings. Amy & Paul play trumpet. Joanne only playing percussion shows how little she plays in her marriage. The wives back up their husbands when they sing their solos in 'Sorry-Grateful'.
blackbelt360 3 years ago
I know am writing a lot, but I find the actor-musician method fascinating. As I said, there are little throughout the show (who plays, what instrument/line they play) that gives further insight in the characters and their relationships. I think the point is driven home at the end of 'What Would We Do Without You', as the couples compliment each others' solos but Bobby plays alone. How tragic is it that all these couples can make beautiful music together, but Bobby has no one to play with.
blackbelt360 3 years ago
Well how would the instruments match the characters personality?
Hasselhoffhater 3 years ago
Best example is how Joanne's instrument is a glass and a triangle-mallet. She's either "drinking" from it or playing it.
seergreen 3 years ago
Oh okay. It's nice to know things or a little bit not.
Hasselhoffhater 3 years ago
Into the Woods. :)
Yeah, I like the actor/musician staging - in Company. I don't think it worked at all for Sweeney.
ieatglue44 3 years ago 3
Really? how so?
Hasselhoffhater 3 years ago
Well, because it's a very conceptual...concept. It worked in Company because of the setting - it takes place in Bobby's mind. It has no plot. There's no real honest scenery or anything to look at. In Sweeney, it's a bit different. Partially because it's timeperiod, but mostly because it has a plot, and it doesn't make sense to me. It's hard to imagine the setting when you're focused on the accordion. Plus, with this set-up you have to strip down the orchestra to just what it needs to sound...
ieatglue44 3 years ago 6
...close to full. In Sweeney, the orchestra needs to have a very complete sound to pull off the horror-ishness about it. That's why I love the movie; they augment the orchestra so large that it immerses you into the entire thing. While some of Doyle's direction worked in Sweeney, he was immensely more successful using the same style for Company, mostly just because it is more conceptual and that is almost the way it was meant to be directed.
ieatglue44 3 years ago 6
Well I thought his production was somewhat unique.
Hasselhoffhater 3 years ago
Then again, I was not a fan of the Hal Prince production because I felt it was a little too over- exaggerated. But understand that John's production was to take place in Tobias' mind.
Hasselhoffhater 3 years ago
See, it's hard to grasp that it takes place in Toby's mind if A) Toby wasn't in every scene, B) you go from the movie/original production to the revival. Whereas Company is written from Bobby's head, so there's no other way to do it, really.
ieatglue44 3 years ago
Uhhhh, Billy? What the Hell is this?
Xenthoz 3 years ago
read the description!
BillyCowles 3 years ago
William-
that was really awsome!! I loved it!!! Keep posting them!
thekatelyn99 3 years ago