Dangers of Molecular Nanotechnology (MNT) Prt 1

[MrBMoreFitness]

i hear some folks claiming that this gentlemen (Bruce H. Lipton Ph.D.) is not a 'biologist'

...but i pose this question: "if one receives his/her B.A. in Biology does that not make him/her a biologist?"

[leydensjar]

On this note, who is the lecturer?

[leydensjar]

Awesome lecture. But nothing about the dangers of nanotech. This is very much misnamed. Does the speaker know his lecture is online with this title?

[Aspanaut]

The genes most important role is in reproduction.

Your parents actually have more of an effect on your genes than you do.

Genes simply store information aquired by the nervous system.

During reproduction,the information is combined with another of the species,this gives sexual reproduction an evolutionary advantage.

Everyone on here is the combination of two organisms which themselves were a combination and this goes all the way back to your earliest multicellular ancestors.

[MindCrazedBanjo]

"Can't live without a brain".......

This guy has obvioulsy never heard of Mike the headless chicken from Fruita Colorado who lived for 18 Months without a head! It's owner Loyd Olsen fed its neck with an eyedropper.

[leydensjar]

@MindCrazedBanjo Mike the headless chicken still had a large portion of it's brain stem.

[olga2415]

This guy is making a lot of sense. I am an identical twin (supposedly exact DNA) and my twin and I are very much different and the older we got the more different in our outlook we got to the point that we do not even share medical histories.This is a vote for the theory that our thought processes and belief systems have some sort of effect on us.

[darcon81]

I've a few questions: is there already an actual nanobot in practical use? or at least a robot that is as small as a pebble? What year do you think that these robots would likely be manufactured? I'm writing a fictional autobiography of a living person going to cryonic sleep in 2045. I'm guessing that by that time, it is possible, through nanotech, that a living person can be put into sleep and wake a hundred years or more.

[MrChimochay]

@darcon81 nanotechnology is being used today but is still in its infancy. There are no "nanobots" yet, as in tiny autonomous robots, but there are nano objects people have made. These nano objects can be considered the first step in making parts for these bots, and if I'm not mistaken the first nano motors are being created as we speak. By 2045 we should be well on our way with nanotechnology, and by mid century we should start seeing some of the incredible things nanotechnology can offer.

[darcon81]

@MrChimochay Thanks for the enlightening answer, mate. I've adjusted his sleep to 2061 just to be sure. haha.

I've an idea though and i would be glad if u can comment on this: They say they have difficulty of making one coz of they're hands are too big. What if they make bigger self replicating robots with A.I. a centibot which will manufacture smaller self replicating robots. The cycle goes on until they make an actual nanobot. Do you think this idea makes any sense?

[MrChimochay]

@darcon81 although it is hard to tell if we'll be able to bring people out of cryo at that time (2045) because this feet requires application of a multitude of separate advanced technologies, most of which are only now being birthed. We should, however, be close to doing it in 2045, or at least have that reality in our sights.

[egokick]

this guy is talking absolute bullshit, he does not understand biology.

[lasheron]

jeans controlling my life? how bout slacks?

[MrChimochay]

genes are not the command center of cells. They are just a mechanism for storing information built up over time by evolution. They are a program for making a biological machine. If that wasn't true how where they able to clone sheep from just one cell and embryo?

[Deathrune456]

@MrChimochay

thats one point of view. Dont you think that a cell's, or group of cell's (considering thats how most cells seem to work) contributions to the body aren't determined by its genetic makup. In this sense, it could be considered a command center.

[MrChimochay]

@Deathrune456 Yes this is true, genes are sort of the long term roadmap. but my further point was that genes are not the "command center" of cells on a day to day, minute to minute basis. This control comes from elsewhere and since these commands directly and constantly influence the host organism, they could be considered more important than genes themselves which could be alternatively expressed even in a clone according to environmental factors and such.

[hyperobjects]

This person is not a biologist.

[dervishmadwhirler]

@hyperobjects yes, he is...

[cmonutube]

why the hell are the first second to ten or so videos on the DANGERS of molecular nanotech?? They should be on the BENEFITS of nanotech

[sydshell]

Big Wars and Catastrophes are distractions for the real wars....Biological and nanotechnological...germ warfare.

[PeaceLoveEternity]

Nanotech is the new NWO!

[floyyyyyd]

GO YUMANS!!!

[hbb8672]

Typical NWO propaganda. Wanting us to accept gene therapies to make us better and more useful drones under the new age.

[JJJinks]

This guy's pretty deceptive...I'm assuming this is in front of a general audience, otherwise he'd have none

[SilverRedIndigo]

I'd feel a lot more comfortable with what he is saying if he were to talk about *morality* and not about "New Age spirituality".

[DK0526]

this guys an idiot!

[Wakazz]

A fully developed cell doesn't need the genes to operate, true. It needs the genes so it can divide and make an exact copy of itself. Without the the genetic information we wouldn't grow

[Darkwizzrobe]

@Wakazz We wont just grow we couldn't live for very long because our cells are damage all the time and need to repair or grow new cells to replace the old ones

[okkima]

So... if I get this right:

If brain is CD as to store information and you store a program to make interface to do some behavior, then it's not the builder of CD who is controlling the interface OF COURSE.

BUT

It's the CD that limits the size of program and the language in which to store it.

So... yeah, genes still reign supreme, sorry lad.

[maxjovine]

nut job

[BenjaminXYang]

Just have a quick look of this, come back later.

[1888junkteam]

excellent work!

[ExtantFrodo]

funny how studies of twins separated at birth counter everything this 'man' says.

funny how he says a belief switches on a gene AND genes are irrelevant. Did anyone else catch the LIE?

How old is this lecture? We've known for 10 years the it's not one gene one protein. Post transcription editing is the basis of plurality of PROTEINS from identical code. This man should be locked up.

[StefanMaffini]

Do you have a link to the studies of twins, where we can find the contradictions?

[ExtantFrodo]

google studies of twins separated at birth

or even better

identical strangers

[3rdKrypton]

This is FUCKING interesting.

[oO0oPurplePower]

that is so interesting! i did not Know.. that the cell is Unaffected after the 'Control Centre'-- the Nucleus is removed from the cell. omg-- this goes against everything i have learnt! LOL waooow.

[edewit08]

Good video

Sounds logical.

Earlyer theology has dispute of predestination similar to later DNA teachings..

God bless Ron Paul in efforts to make sound monetary system based on valuable metals.

[isamelbou]

This man is so wrong, I have spotted his error and i am not even a geneticist just an amateur. He said that when DNA is removed still behaves the same as before the removal.

Only one thing that he did not mention that would be affected cell reproduction because that is the function of the DNA to code for the reproduction of the cell not to directly control cell functions.

[oO0oPurplePower]

ahh.. i did not catch that!.. yes-- the cell would not be Able to reproduce.... since there are no chromosomes to give to the daughter cells!

i still think that besides that...it is pretty amazing .. to see the general behaviour of the cell unaffected after the Nucleus is removed. ... since the DNA does control what happens inside the cell.. even if it is indirect...

[ExtantFrodo]

It's also part of the cellular response system. Environmental factors can signal the nucleus to turn on or off production of proteins. In the case of turning on production the cell may not have needed to prior to being enucleated so the protein would never get produced the cell would lack that beneficial tool and in many cases cecum and fail due to the inability to respond.

This guy is so far off base it's not even funny. Truly this man is a criminal.

[likezack]

vitrohype