Atheists are sensitive little things living in their own insular world where they place themselves atop the intellectual ladder. In reality, atheists are as stubborn as a coffee stain and as ignorant as a door knob. The fallacy-laden comments here are prime examples. Imaginary friend? Really? Atheist and their straw men.
@ChristianMission we only want evidence of the fact that he exists. if you cant provide good enough un-refuteable evidence then we will continue to refer to god or any other deity as imaginary
@zorokism , not all that's true can be proven absolutely. Many things are accepted true because they're plausibly more true than not. For example, there's no absolute evidence 2nd & 3rd hand smoke endangers people's health but it's more plausible that they do and thus should be avoided. Same with God; His existence is more probable than not given the strongest arguments, such as those proposed by Lennox, who even had Dawkins admit there's a strong argument for a deistic God.
as much as it pains me to say, I think this clown should be allowed to have his own show, whether on tv, or radio, only because every american has the right to free speech, no matter how much of a bigoted fuck you look like.
beck, o' reilley, anne cult-er, all the same bible thumping religitards who mainly focus on religious issues of the united states, because those MUST be the most important issues, besides the NDAA bill, SOPA, the war in afghanistan, and the economy. fuck you beck.
Prime example of the degredation of humanity that is spoken of in this video happens to exist within the comments of this video. At the time of this post on this page 90% of the comments contain at least one word of profanity. You have the right to believe as you wish, but know it reveals alot about ones character when it is difficult for you to express your emotions without a swear. If you care to impress me, try countering this while excluding curses.
@RiaRadioFMHD773 Your lack of acceptance of swearing as a form of expressing oneself is a clear indication of your Perscriptivist attitude. People swear because it emphasises a point that they are making; Glenn Beck is a moron. Glenn Beck is a fucking moron. One is a lot stronger than the other, and when One is attempting to be multi-modal, written swearing makes up for lack of tone of voice and facial expression to show distaste. It's called progression get over yourself.
Really guys, a moment of silence constitutes prayer?. It doesnt say "a moment of prayer". Its a moment of silence, you can think of what you please, if you dont want to pray then dont. Take your moment of silence to reflect on your upcoming test, or take your moment of silence to think of what atheist think of.....NOTHING. God bless you all. there are bigger things we can be bothering congress about.
@AABREU80 That assertion that atheists don't think makes me laugh hysterically since Christians are taught that questioning is bad and that you will go to hell if you do. What a hypocrite and closed-minded ass you are. Please don't make yourself look dumb any longer.
This is classic Fox News nonsense that they class as "reporting"; they can't reveal all the facts, so they resort to fear-mongering & attempting low-blow attacks on those they disagree with
If people honestly fall for this bullshit, then they really DO need a God telling them what to do, since they obviously can't think for themselves
BTW are the dislikes on this video the results of Votebots or because people think this is in support of Beck & this nodding-dog Doctor Dobson?
Not every Atheist is like Kim Jong-Il, you stupid, bigoted fuck! In fact, I always find this disconnect rather hilarious. Theists don't know what it's like to live in a world where you aren't a SLAVE, so they just assume that our minds work as theirs do. Hence, Christians think we are "militant," "dogmatic," and "worship ourselves."
This couldn't be FURTHER from the truth...or more pathetically hilarious. ROFL!!!
@macgeek2004 There are any number of examples in history where atheists, ruling in an explicitly atheistic system, were (and are) militant, dogmatic, and self-worshipping. In fact it has been the rule rather than the exception and the results have been the most horrific humanity has ever seen.
this is why we need to teach kids ALL sides of everything. not semantics, but generalities. present different beliefs and let kids make their own decisions. there is a 'we don't wanna hear what you think' (aka politically correct) old paradigm being inflicted on kids. good news... kids can handle various viewpoints that better than adults
I think there should be a a world religion course required in all schools. A historical view of belief and religion in every culture. But, no, they just want to ram christianity down children's throats.
We're not trying to ram non-belief down your throat. We're trying to ram the constitution down your throat, but theres no room for it, because you've already rammed a bible down it.
@LOL4Polio Nothing in the text or history of the Constitution prohibits prayer in school. Such prayers were the norm at the time the Constitution and Bill of Rights were ratified and for a century and a half after.
@LOL4Polio If the people of my community wanted Muslim prayer in school, that would be their call. If I did not want my children to participate, I would send them to another school.
@nnjhansen What if you can't afford private school? What if you are a single parent who works 60 hours a week and do not have the option to home school?
@nnjhansen So you are fine with a public establishment funded by your tax dollars promoting a religious belief to your children that you don't want them to believe in?
@LOL4Polio Sure, just as I accept the spending of my tax dollars on any number of other things I personally do not believe in. We live in a society in which public policy is rightly made my the people, either directly or through their elected representatives. Sometimes I agree with those policy decisions and sometimes I do not. I accept those I do not agree with because I accept the system by which they were made.
@nnjhansen But, obviously you are not ok with it. You had just outlined every possible step you would take to avoid sending your children to a public school that promoted a religious belief that you do not share. What is more practical? For government to remain neutral on religion and not promote any particular belief(as the first amendment requires) or to insist that parents take there kids out of school, that they pay for with their tax dollars, if they don't agree with the prayer?
@LOL4Polio Why do you find it somehow more practical to deny the people the opportunity to have their children pray in a school they pay for with their tax dollars? Millions of Americans have made and are making the exact same decision I said I would. There are thousands of Catholic and other religious schools that exist precisely because parents decided they were dissatisfied with public schools.
The government should be neutral only when the people want it to be.
@nnjhansen I think you are misunderstanding the entire debate. The issue is not banning prayer in schools, which will never be banned. The issue is SCHOOL LEAD PRAYER.
Secondly, the bill of rights does not exist to allow the majority to do what ever they want. It says nothing that resembles that as you're suggesting. It exists to protect the minority by outlining rights that not even a majority can take away from you.
@LOL4Polio I think you are misunderstanding the debate. The people want SCHOOL LEAD PRAYER and nothing in the text or history of the Constitution says that is not their call to make.
As I said, such prayers were the norm when the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were ratified and remained so for a century and a half. What changed to make such prayers now prohibited?
@nnjhansen The first amendment outlines the role that government should have in religion, which is none. We also didn't give blacks all the rights represented in the bill of rights for decades. Is your argument that because something was done a certain way a hundred years ago it was the right way to do it? Many things were the norm that are not now. Why does there have to be school lead prayer? Why is that soo important?
@LOL4Polio The 1st Amendment does nothing more than prohibit Congress from establishing a national religion, interfering with the (then existing) states' established religions, and impeding the free exercise of religion.
There were intervening acts, both constitutional and statutory, regarding the status of black Americans under the Constitution.
I am saying that baring such intervening acts, the Constitution means today what it meant when ratified.
@nnjhansen It does more than prohibit the establishment of a national religion. If that's all it did, it would say that. But, it states that congress shall make NO LAW RESPECTING an establishment of religion. Multiple founding fathers and more than half of the first 20 presidents of the US even mention the religion clause as creating a wall of separation between church and state. School lead prayer establishes a preference of religion by our government, which is a violation of the 1st amendment.
@LOL4Polio The language, 'respecting an establishment of religion" was drafted to not only prohibit establishment of a national religion but to also insure that Congress did not interfere with the states' established religions. It means simply, Congress shall make no law with respct to, concerning, or with regard to.
The 1st Amendment does not prohibit "a preference of religion by our government." The Congress that drafted it and imposed its limits on itself opened its sessions with prayer.
@nnjhansen Allowing the government to show preference to a religion IS ESTABLISHING a religion. This has been clarified MANY times by the supreme court, the branch of our government charged with interpreting the law. See: Illinois v McCollum, Engel v Vitale, Abington School District v Schempp, Murray v Curtlett, Wallace v Jaffree, Lee v Weisman, etc.
@LOL4Polio Did you notice that the cases you cited were all from the mid-20th century? The Congress that drafted the 1st Amendment and the states that ratified it did not believe that, "(a)llowing the government to show preference to a religion IS ESTABLISHING a religion."
What intervening event caused their understanding of the language they wrote and approved to change its meaning 150 years later?
@nnjhansen In the Vitale case, the court even wrote "It is a matter of history that this very practice of establishing governmentally composed prayers for religious services was one of the reasons that caused many of our early colonists to leave England and seek religious freedom in America." 200 years ago, we had slavery, we had public lynchings, we didn't treat everyone equally under the law, etc. What do you think has changed? IS something being enough evidence to support it's practice?
@LOL4Polio The court's statement is not only irrelevant to the question but historically dubious.
Again, we amended the Constitution to outlaw slavery. We did not simply pretend the Constitution said something it did not or that its words meant something they had never meant before.
If you want the practice to end, change the law. Do not pretennd the Constitution prohibits what the Congress that drafted the 1st Amendment and the states that ratified it did not believe it prohibited.
@nnjhansen Why do founders and early presidents repeatedly mention a wall of separation of church and state if thats not what was intended? The only purpose of school lead prayer is to establish a preference of religion by our government. Period. By doing so it violates the establishment clause. I would argue that at any time in history where prayer was lead by school it was in violation of the US constitution. Old way does not equal right way, as you are trying to argue.
@LOL4Polio Which founders? In what context? Jefferson used the phrase to contrast the Congress' inability to establish a religion with CT's ability to do so.
The very Congress that drafted the amendment asked Pres Washington "to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God" Was that unconstitutional?
@nnjhansen Name one good reason why we NEED school sponsored prayer. It is completely unnecessary for any government worker to influence the religious views of a child. How is that not completely inappropriate to you on a personal opinion level?
@LOL4Polio The one good reason, and the only necessary reason, is that the people want it. They pay for the schools and it is rightfully their decision to make.
@nnjhansen Not everyone wants it, as those court cases express. THATS EXACTLY what school prayer does! It imposes something on people that believe something differently. The government has NO RIGHT to do such. There is no purpose to it than to spread a religious belief, which is not the reason we send children to school. There are churches for that. I have the right to send my child to school without a particular religion being shoved down their throat.
@LOL4Polio Everyone does not have to agree with a public policy decision for that decision to be legitimate.
Who are you to decide what people want their children to get out of their school experience?
You have every right to send your children to a school which reflects your views, just like anyone else. You do not have a right to impose your wishes on the majority of your fellow citizens.
@nnjhansen "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and state." Jefferson
@nnjhansen Atheists don't want teachers telling our kids that god exists and we talk to him. Christians don't want teachers telling kids to give praise to allah. Jews don't want teachers telling their kids that god does not exist. Why is it that christianity gets the free pass? Imagine the rioting that would happen if a teacher told his students every morning that god didn't exist. There is a complete double standard in our society on this issue.
@LOL4Polio There is not a double standard if the people who send their children to the school and those who pay for the school get to decide what the teacher does and does not do.
@LOL4Polio Old way does equal permissible way if the practice was permissible when the Constitution was ratified and no intervening actions have changed its permissibility.
@nnjhansen Just because something was permissible, even though illegal, does not make it permissible today. It's something that should have never happened in schools in the first place, the fact that it did does not provide a loophole around the first amendment.
@nnjhansen I'm just stating what the law is today. Thats why I posted all of those court precedents. There is no good reason to have school sponsored prayer. You may say that the majority of americans support it, but thats only because it promotes their religion. If it were muslim prayer, you'd have millions of americans rioting in the streets screaming "this violates the first amendment" It's convenient for you to violate it now, because it's not a religious view you have a problem with.
@LOL4Polio The 'law' as you state it has no basis in the law as written.
There may well be no good reason to have school prayer but that does not make it unconstitutional.
You disagree with school prayer and are free to vote for those who share your view, why are you so intent on misusing the Constitution to impose your view on those who believe differently?
@LOL4Polio Since you like court citations, how about one from Scalia in his dissent in McCreary? "Nothing stands behind the Court's assertion that governmental affirmation of the society's belief in God is unconstitutional except the Court's own say-so, citing as support only the unsubstantiated say-so of earlier Courts going back no farther than the mid-20th century... And it is, moreover, a thoroughly discredited say-so."
@nnjhansen I'm not at all surprised that an extremely conservative christian and Reagan appointee would say that. He's also a fan of striking down Roe v Wade.
There are numerous court cases that have set a precedent on the matter. Tax payer funded places cannot be used to promote a religion. That's the interpretation of the first amendment that is currently the legal standard.There is no legal problem with individuals practicing prayer in schools. A teacher cannot lead a classroom in prayer, however. Thats the law. We have a secular government.
@LOL4Polio I did not mention court cases for a reason. The current Establishment Clause jurisprudence is a muddled mess and I, for one, do not accept the idea that five unelected lawyers are or should be empowered to amend the Constitution at their whim. My statement stands, "nothing in the text or history of the Constitution prohibits prayer in school."
I would love to have prayer in school with the other christians.
We could read all the shitty scriptures about killing baby's, rape, incest, slavery, murder, getting drunk with your daughter then getting hey pregnant etc.
Then in closing say thank god that the bible is man made bull shit.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
@bobster451 1. The 1st Amendment explicitly restricts only Congress. It was not until the middle of the 20th century that the theory that it somehow applied to the states was posited.
2. Congress, the only body expressly prohibited by the amendment, opens every day with a prayer.
How do you square this with your assertion that prayer is illegal to do in 'a public funded place'?
When he says "I'm not forcing it down your throats" does he not realize, having religious references in school is exactly that? Children are impressionable and if you suggest prayer often enough, many of them will start to believe it. I think all that is needed is simply NO mention of religion or religious tradiations outside of theology or classic art classes. Why is that so hard? I want some teacher to lead the class in a prayer to Shiva or Sathya Sai Baba and watch Fox News' reaction.
@ryanwyshynski He said neither. He did write to his wife on17 July 1757 after surviving a shipwreck, "The bell ringing for church, we went thither immediately, and with hearts full of gratitude, returned sincere thanks to God for the mercies we had received: were I a Roman Catholic, perhaps I should on this occasion vow to build a chapel to some saint, but as I am not, if I were to vow at all, it should be to build a light-house."
@nnjhansen Yeah I googled it and probably found the same page you copy-pasted. It appears you are correct. The sentiment is the same though so lets not argue over semantics lol
@TheHobbsicle Did you notice that none of those links include a citation stating where or when he said it?
It is a fake.
What he did write in a letter to his wife is, "The bell ringing for church, we went thither immediately, and with hearts full of gratitude, returned sincere thanks to God for the mercies we had received: were I a Roman Catholic, perhaps I should on this occasion vow to build a chapel to some saint, but as I am not, if I were to vow at all, it should be to build a lighthouse."
"If you eliminate god, where do the rights come from?"
That's fantastically rude. Glenn if you find out today, that there is no god, will you just go outside killing a person, just because you believe, that rights become worthless?
Of course not! But you think atheists do that, because the human primate isn't capable of deciding what's right and what not?
You should build up some self-respect big guy... for us and for our species.
Why is not mentioning religion and requiring government employees to not mention religion shoving our nonbelief down Glenn's throat? Nobody show this guy the intentionally blank pages in bound books (including the Bible!) or he might think publishers have an atheist agenda, too.
Funny. This WASN'T "One nation, under God" until 1954, when that line was added to the Pledge, more than 50 years after it was written, due to the efforts of Christian lobbyists whose sole goal was to have god mentioned in the Pledge.
"I ain't forcin' it down your throat, don't force it down mine."
Then why is "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance?
Also, there are no "atheist children." Unlike religious people, we understand that children are not mature enough to form an opinion on a subject like that.
so he (and many others) like to say this is "one nation under god" to argue that this nation is prominently a religious one; yet what they fail to realize is that 'god' wasn't added to the pledge until the 1950s. The same is for having 'in god we trust' on money
First off the 10 % is bullied around by the 90%, beck. Secondly, I have read the federalist papers and your constitution (not an american myself) . It doesnt say one nation under god. Why doesnt he talk to an atheist about this?
The problem with people like Glenn Beck is that they foster the false belief that the US was founded by Christians, for Christians.
The fact is that 'under god' was not introduced to the pledge of allegience until the 1950s, when the government wanted a way of differentiating the US from the USSR. it also took almost 100 years after the country was formed for 'in god we trust' to appear on coinage.
The 1st amendment guarantees freedom of/from religion. Religion is supposed to be private.
@BigManFromThe80s The concept of a freedom from religion is either meaningless or an affront to the actual freedoms of speech and religious exercise.
Whether 'under God' was added to the Pledge in the 50's is irrelevant
This nation has ways acknowledged God in various ways.
The 1st Congress requested Pres Washington "to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God"
Hey Glenn, despite the fact that our Founding Fathers wrote "one nation under God", it was still men that wrote our laws. The state continues to write laws and uphold them through our justice system. These are all men and women, not God. How can you argue against that, you friggin moron?
I stopped getting offended along time ago by Glen's...ugh words of patriotism..I think youtube is in agreement that he is a source of entertainment and nothing more as seen by from the amounts of thumbs down he gets on every posted video of him. To say you're offended by Glen beck is extremely redundant.
In this ONE case, I agree with Glenn Beck. I'm an atheist, and know that public school-led prayer is unconstitutional, and should be banned. However, I disagree with the judge's ruling that the moment of silence should be banned because someone might pray. There's nothing wrong with praying in school. There IS something wrong with public school-led prayer.
Yup, I worship a broom. I can see a broom, I can touch/feel a broom. It's there. it helps me remove dry leaves from my porch. It helps me keep my house safe from stray cats and raccoons. I'm thankful for the broom. And just like god, the broom is an Atheist like me.
@mechupanlamonda- I absolutely agree with you, for me, it doesn't matter if I like him or hate him (I think he's an idiot) but Glen Beck is so stupidly entertaining, I consider his show is similar to Jackass (Nothing but mindless entertainment)
@BCT071 Wow, really? I honestly thought that rights were universal and that we were endowed by a magical creator with them. Thanks for setting me straight.
Atheists are sensitive little things living in their own insular world where they place themselves atop the intellectual ladder. In reality, atheists are as stubborn as a coffee stain and as ignorant as a door knob. The fallacy-laden comments here are prime examples. Imaginary friend? Really? Atheist and their straw men.
ChristianMission 1 week ago
@ChristianMission we only want evidence of the fact that he exists. if you cant provide good enough un-refuteable evidence then we will continue to refer to god or any other deity as imaginary
zorokism 1 week ago
@zorokism , not all that's true can be proven absolutely. Many things are accepted true because they're plausibly more true than not. For example, there's no absolute evidence 2nd & 3rd hand smoke endangers people's health but it's more plausible that they do and thus should be avoided. Same with God; His existence is more probable than not given the strongest arguments, such as those proposed by Lennox, who even had Dawkins admit there's a strong argument for a deistic God.
ChristianMission 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็
Akeuw 1 week ago
DO you guys believe IM GOD?
Akeuw 1 week ago
ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็---ส็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็็
Akeuw 1 week ago
JUST when I think Beck couldn't POSSIBLY be any dumber, he goes and proves me wrong over and over again.
benisme86 1 week ago
fox news is as neutral as mike tyson is white...
jayot33 2 weeks ago
2 retards talking about their imaginary friend. How cute.
JabberCT 2 weeks ago
Wanna see a room full of crying atheists Glenn? Walk into a hospital nursery.
goldenchopsticks 2 weeks ago
you would get the EXACT same results if you pray to a broom as you would praying to god.
samuriguy909 2 weeks ago 11
as much as it pains me to say, I think this clown should be allowed to have his own show, whether on tv, or radio, only because every american has the right to free speech, no matter how much of a bigoted fuck you look like.
samuriguy909 2 weeks ago
beck, o' reilley, anne cult-er, all the same bible thumping religitards who mainly focus on religious issues of the united states, because those MUST be the most important issues, besides the NDAA bill, SOPA, the war in afghanistan, and the economy. fuck you beck.
samuriguy909 2 weeks ago
Prime example of the degredation of humanity that is spoken of in this video happens to exist within the comments of this video. At the time of this post on this page 90% of the comments contain at least one word of profanity. You have the right to believe as you wish, but know it reveals alot about ones character when it is difficult for you to express your emotions without a swear. If you care to impress me, try countering this while excluding curses.
RiaRadioFMHD773 3 weeks ago
@RiaRadioFMHD773 Your lack of acceptance of swearing as a form of expressing oneself is a clear indication of your Perscriptivist attitude. People swear because it emphasises a point that they are making; Glenn Beck is a moron. Glenn Beck is a fucking moron. One is a lot stronger than the other, and when One is attempting to be multi-modal, written swearing makes up for lack of tone of voice and facial expression to show distaste. It's called progression get over yourself.
tjwow123 3 weeks ago 5
No one has ever polled me about whether I believe in God! Glenn Beck - you are dangerous!
scienceisgod1 3 weeks ago
Don't wanna force it down my throat? Take it off the dollars I spend.
fundslender 3 weeks ago 2
Um, but they do force it down our throats. Thank Greenland I live in Canada.
BeachofDreams 3 weeks ago
what a cunt....
badgerboyUK 3 weeks ago
Beck is a brainless and horrible excuse of a human!
RetroTanc 4 weeks ago
Beck and Dobson...together in the same room. Oh fuck me.
templar19 4 weeks ago
Dumb fuck yanks........
tellnet 4 weeks ago
Quite obviously, you could care less
loayzc10 1 month ago
Two idiots yanking eachother's ________s.
AudriannaCole 1 month ago
Glenn Beck, you're a professional idiot, try not to be an asshole about it.
Ryakki 1 month ago
Really guys, a moment of silence constitutes prayer?. It doesnt say "a moment of prayer". Its a moment of silence, you can think of what you please, if you dont want to pray then dont. Take your moment of silence to reflect on your upcoming test, or take your moment of silence to think of what atheist think of.....NOTHING. God bless you all. there are bigger things we can be bothering congress about.
AABREU80 1 month ago
@AABREU80 That assertion that atheists don't think makes me laugh hysterically since Christians are taught that questioning is bad and that you will go to hell if you do. What a hypocrite and closed-minded ass you are. Please don't make yourself look dumb any longer.
TheWhiteShadow42 1 month ago
... Glenn... you're a Mormon. Forcing your religion down other people's throats is one of the main tenets of the Mormon faith.
GetOneInTheYarbles 1 month ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAH GLENN LOL HAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA
reanimated6 1 month ago
This is classic Fox News nonsense that they class as "reporting"; they can't reveal all the facts, so they resort to fear-mongering & attempting low-blow attacks on those they disagree with
If people honestly fall for this bullshit, then they really DO need a God telling them what to do, since they obviously can't think for themselves
BTW are the dislikes on this video the results of Votebots or because people think this is in support of Beck & this nodding-dog Doctor Dobson?
Tarynus 2 months ago
Glenn Beck is a total fucking pussy so is this gee wizz doctor assmunch.
1963danno 2 months ago
Now that he's mentioned it, I think they really should consider changing it to "One Nation Under Broom".
Kalkbrenner 2 months ago
Only sheep need a shepherd.
1undergroundsound 2 months ago
WTF is this on the retard channel?
ACCSESS247 2 months ago
@nnjhansen
Not every Atheist is like Kim Jong-Il, you stupid, bigoted fuck! In fact, I always find this disconnect rather hilarious. Theists don't know what it's like to live in a world where you aren't a SLAVE, so they just assume that our minds work as theirs do. Hence, Christians think we are "militant," "dogmatic," and "worship ourselves."
This couldn't be FURTHER from the truth...or more pathetically hilarious. ROFL!!!
macgeek2004 2 months ago
@macgeek2004 There are any number of examples in history where atheists, ruling in an explicitly atheistic system, were (and are) militant, dogmatic, and self-worshipping. In fact it has been the rule rather than the exception and the results have been the most horrific humanity has ever seen.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@SimpleNanaMan Actually history shows they have a very bad habit of worshiping themselves with horrific results.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
Might as well pray to a broom. I bet you would get the same results
sirbaleus 2 months ago
I wonder how such a idiot can have his journalist card.
maotzetof 2 months ago
@maotzetof What is a journalist card?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen
A press card
maotzetof 2 months ago
Glenn Beck has GBTV. He moved on to become part of the solution of progressivism.
CoolGuy18201 2 months ago
This is why your show is canceled and your on your merry way to the shitter
crimsonlung 2 months ago
this is why we need to teach kids ALL sides of everything. not semantics, but generalities. present different beliefs and let kids make their own decisions. there is a 'we don't wanna hear what you think' (aka politically correct) old paradigm being inflicted on kids. good news... kids can handle various viewpoints that better than adults
theAbeElement 2 months ago
I think there should be a a world religion course required in all schools. A historical view of belief and religion in every culture. But, no, they just want to ram christianity down children's throats.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
We're not trying to ram non-belief down your throat. We're trying to ram the constitution down your throat, but theres no room for it, because you've already rammed a bible down it.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Nothing in the text or history of the Constitution prohibits prayer in school. Such prayers were the norm at the time the Constitution and Bill of Rights were ratified and for a century and a half after.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen So you would be fine with Muslim prayer in a classroom your kids are in?
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio If the people of my community wanted Muslim prayer in school, that would be their call. If I did not want my children to participate, I would send them to another school.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen What if all the schools in your area only practiced muslim prayer?
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Then they would attend a private school or I would home school them.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen What if you can't afford private school? What if you are a single parent who works 60 hours a week and do not have the option to home school?
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Then they would go to school and I would explain that the beliefs expressed were not those I shared.
Any more hypotheticals?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen So you are fine with a public establishment funded by your tax dollars promoting a religious belief to your children that you don't want them to believe in?
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Sure, just as I accept the spending of my tax dollars on any number of other things I personally do not believe in. We live in a society in which public policy is rightly made my the people, either directly or through their elected representatives. Sometimes I agree with those policy decisions and sometimes I do not. I accept those I do not agree with because I accept the system by which they were made.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen But, obviously you are not ok with it. You had just outlined every possible step you would take to avoid sending your children to a public school that promoted a religious belief that you do not share. What is more practical? For government to remain neutral on religion and not promote any particular belief(as the first amendment requires) or to insist that parents take there kids out of school, that they pay for with their tax dollars, if they don't agree with the prayer?
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Why do you find it somehow more practical to deny the people the opportunity to have their children pray in a school they pay for with their tax dollars? Millions of Americans have made and are making the exact same decision I said I would. There are thousands of Catholic and other religious schools that exist precisely because parents decided they were dissatisfied with public schools.
The government should be neutral only when the people want it to be.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen I think you are misunderstanding the entire debate. The issue is not banning prayer in schools, which will never be banned. The issue is SCHOOL LEAD PRAYER.
Secondly, the bill of rights does not exist to allow the majority to do what ever they want. It says nothing that resembles that as you're suggesting. It exists to protect the minority by outlining rights that not even a majority can take away from you.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio I think you are misunderstanding the debate. The people want SCHOOL LEAD PRAYER and nothing in the text or history of the Constitution says that is not their call to make.
As I said, such prayers were the norm when the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were ratified and remained so for a century and a half. What changed to make such prayers now prohibited?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen The first amendment outlines the role that government should have in religion, which is none. We also didn't give blacks all the rights represented in the bill of rights for decades. Is your argument that because something was done a certain way a hundred years ago it was the right way to do it? Many things were the norm that are not now. Why does there have to be school lead prayer? Why is that soo important?
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio The 1st Amendment does nothing more than prohibit Congress from establishing a national religion, interfering with the (then existing) states' established religions, and impeding the free exercise of religion.
There were intervening acts, both constitutional and statutory, regarding the status of black Americans under the Constitution.
I am saying that baring such intervening acts, the Constitution means today what it meant when ratified.
It is important because the people say it is.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen It does more than prohibit the establishment of a national religion. If that's all it did, it would say that. But, it states that congress shall make NO LAW RESPECTING an establishment of religion. Multiple founding fathers and more than half of the first 20 presidents of the US even mention the religion clause as creating a wall of separation between church and state. School lead prayer establishes a preference of religion by our government, which is a violation of the 1st amendment.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio The language, 'respecting an establishment of religion" was drafted to not only prohibit establishment of a national religion but to also insure that Congress did not interfere with the states' established religions. It means simply, Congress shall make no law with respct to, concerning, or with regard to.
The 1st Amendment does not prohibit "a preference of religion by our government." The Congress that drafted it and imposed its limits on itself opened its sessions with prayer.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen Allowing the government to show preference to a religion IS ESTABLISHING a religion. This has been clarified MANY times by the supreme court, the branch of our government charged with interpreting the law. See: Illinois v McCollum, Engel v Vitale, Abington School District v Schempp, Murray v Curtlett, Wallace v Jaffree, Lee v Weisman, etc.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Did you notice that the cases you cited were all from the mid-20th century? The Congress that drafted the 1st Amendment and the states that ratified it did not believe that, "(a)llowing the government to show preference to a religion IS ESTABLISHING a religion."
What intervening event caused their understanding of the language they wrote and approved to change its meaning 150 years later?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen In the Vitale case, the court even wrote "It is a matter of history that this very practice of establishing governmentally composed prayers for religious services was one of the reasons that caused many of our early colonists to leave England and seek religious freedom in America." 200 years ago, we had slavery, we had public lynchings, we didn't treat everyone equally under the law, etc. What do you think has changed? IS something being enough evidence to support it's practice?
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio The court's statement is not only irrelevant to the question but historically dubious.
Again, we amended the Constitution to outlaw slavery. We did not simply pretend the Constitution said something it did not or that its words meant something they had never meant before.
If you want the practice to end, change the law. Do not pretennd the Constitution prohibits what the Congress that drafted the 1st Amendment and the states that ratified it did not believe it prohibited.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen Why do founders and early presidents repeatedly mention a wall of separation of church and state if thats not what was intended? The only purpose of school lead prayer is to establish a preference of religion by our government. Period. By doing so it violates the establishment clause. I would argue that at any time in history where prayer was lead by school it was in violation of the US constitution. Old way does not equal right way, as you are trying to argue.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Which founders? In what context? Jefferson used the phrase to contrast the Congress' inability to establish a religion with CT's ability to do so.
The very Congress that drafted the amendment asked Pres Washington "to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God" Was that unconstitutional?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen Yes, it was unconstitutional. A permissible breach of a law does not nullify that law.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio I ask again, did the Congress which drafted the 1st Amendment not understand what they wrote?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen Name one good reason why we NEED school sponsored prayer. It is completely unnecessary for any government worker to influence the religious views of a child. How is that not completely inappropriate to you on a personal opinion level?
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio The one good reason, and the only necessary reason, is that the people want it. They pay for the schools and it is rightfully their decision to make.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen Not everyone wants it, as those court cases express. THATS EXACTLY what school prayer does! It imposes something on people that believe something differently. The government has NO RIGHT to do such. There is no purpose to it than to spread a religious belief, which is not the reason we send children to school. There are churches for that. I have the right to send my child to school without a particular religion being shoved down their throat.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Everyone does not have to agree with a public policy decision for that decision to be legitimate.
Who are you to decide what people want their children to get out of their school experience?
You have every right to send your children to a school which reflects your views, just like anyone else. You do not have a right to impose your wishes on the majority of your fellow citizens.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LOL4Polio Is there a reason you will not answer my question?
Did the Congress which drafted the 1st Amendment not understand what they wrote?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen "I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should `make no law respecting establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and state." Jefferson
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio And Jefferson was responding to a letter from the Danbury Baptists regarding CT's established Congregationalist religion.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen Atheists don't want teachers telling our kids that god exists and we talk to him. Christians don't want teachers telling kids to give praise to allah. Jews don't want teachers telling their kids that god does not exist. Why is it that christianity gets the free pass? Imagine the rioting that would happen if a teacher told his students every morning that god didn't exist. There is a complete double standard in our society on this issue.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio There is not a double standard if the people who send their children to the school and those who pay for the school get to decide what the teacher does and does not do.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Old way does equal permissible way if the practice was permissible when the Constitution was ratified and no intervening actions have changed its permissibility.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen Just because something was permissible, even though illegal, does not make it permissible today. It's something that should have never happened in schools in the first place, the fact that it did does not provide a loophole around the first amendment.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Are you arguing that the Congress which drafted the 1st Amendment did not understand what they wrote?
That the state legislatures which ratified it did not understand what they had ratified?
Or, did they willfully ignore what they wrote and ratified?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen I'm just stating what the law is today. Thats why I posted all of those court precedents. There is no good reason to have school sponsored prayer. You may say that the majority of americans support it, but thats only because it promotes their religion. If it were muslim prayer, you'd have millions of americans rioting in the streets screaming "this violates the first amendment" It's convenient for you to violate it now, because it's not a religious view you have a problem with.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio The 'law' as you state it has no basis in the law as written.
There may well be no good reason to have school prayer but that does not make it unconstitutional.
You disagree with school prayer and are free to vote for those who share your view, why are you so intent on misusing the Constitution to impose your view on those who believe differently?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen something being old*
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Since you like court citations, how about one from Scalia in his dissent in McCreary? "Nothing stands behind the Court's assertion that governmental affirmation of the society's belief in God is unconstitutional except the Court's own say-so, citing as support only the unsubstantiated say-so of earlier Courts going back no farther than the mid-20th century... And it is, moreover, a thoroughly discredited say-so."
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen I'm not at all surprised that an extremely conservative christian and Reagan appointee would say that. He's also a fan of striking down Roe v Wade.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio Instead of attacking him, why not at least try to attack his argument?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@LOL4Polio I find it funny that you attack Scalia but cite Justice Black. Only one of these menwas a Klan member and it was not Scalia.
nnjhansen 2 months ago
There are numerous court cases that have set a precedent on the matter. Tax payer funded places cannot be used to promote a religion. That's the interpretation of the first amendment that is currently the legal standard.There is no legal problem with individuals practicing prayer in schools. A teacher cannot lead a classroom in prayer, however. Thats the law. We have a secular government.
LOL4Polio 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LOL4Polio I did not mention court cases for a reason. The current Establishment Clause jurisprudence is a muddled mess and I, for one, do not accept the idea that five unelected lawyers are or should be empowered to amend the Constitution at their whim. My statement stands, "nothing in the text or history of the Constitution prohibits prayer in school."
nnjhansen 2 months ago
I would love to have prayer in school with the other christians.
We could read all the shitty scriptures about killing baby's, rape, incest, slavery, murder, getting drunk with your daughter then getting hey pregnant etc.
Then in closing say thank god that the bible is man made bull shit.
Wordoffakes 2 months ago
Beck is an idiot.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
bobster451 2 months ago
@bobster451 And what part of that leads you to believe a local school board, county, or state cannot allow prayer in a public school classroom?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
@nnjhansen THe fact that it is illegal to do it in a public funded place.
See The First Amendment of The Bill of Rights, The Constitution of the United States of America. That IS the law of the entire U.S.
Were you sleeping during this part of your education, or are you from a foreign nation and not a U.S. citizen?
bobster451 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bobster451 1. The 1st Amendment explicitly restricts only Congress. It was not until the middle of the 20th century that the theory that it somehow applied to the states was posited.
2. Congress, the only body expressly prohibited by the amendment, opens every day with a prayer.
How do you square this with your assertion that prayer is illegal to do in 'a public funded place'?
nnjhansen 2 months ago
When he says "I'm not forcing it down your throats" does he not realize, having religious references in school is exactly that? Children are impressionable and if you suggest prayer often enough, many of them will start to believe it. I think all that is needed is simply NO mention of religion or religious tradiations outside of theology or classic art classes. Why is that so hard? I want some teacher to lead the class in a prayer to Shiva or Sathya Sai Baba and watch Fox News' reaction.
ryanwyshynski 3 months ago
"Lighthouses are more helpful then churches" - Benjamin Franklin
TheHobbsicle 3 months ago
Comment removed
nnjhansen 3 months ago
@TheHobbsicle Franklin never said that.
nnjhansen 3 months ago
@nnjhansen Yes he did. Except he said "useful", not "helpful".
ryanwyshynski 3 months ago
@ryanwyshynski He said neither. He did write to his wife on17 July 1757 after surviving a shipwreck, "The bell ringing for church, we went thither immediately, and with hearts full of gratitude, returned sincere thanks to God for the mercies we had received: were I a Roman Catholic, perhaps I should on this occasion vow to build a chapel to some saint, but as I am not, if I were to vow at all, it should be to build a light-house."
nnjhansen 3 months ago
@nnjhansen Yeah I googled it and probably found the same page you copy-pasted. It appears you are correct. The sentiment is the same though so lets not argue over semantics lol
ryanwyshynski 3 months ago
@ryanwyshynski The sentiment is in no way the same.
Nice to see you admit hen you are wrong though.
nnjhansen 3 months ago
@nnjhansen Yes he did. Just google the quote. Hundreds of links will pop up :)
TheHobbsicle 2 months ago
@TheHobbsicle Did you notice that none of those links include a citation stating where or when he said it?
It is a fake.
What he did write in a letter to his wife is, "The bell ringing for church, we went thither immediately, and with hearts full of gratitude, returned sincere thanks to God for the mercies we had received: were I a Roman Catholic, perhaps I should on this occasion vow to build a chapel to some saint, but as I am not, if I were to vow at all, it should be to build a lighthouse."
nnjhansen 2 months ago
religion in school is brainwashing ! i dont want my kids to be told a bunch of lies and fairy-tales !!
TheRealRealTalk 3 months ago in playlist Liked
90% bullshit ! fuck Glenn BeKKK
TheRealRealTalk 3 months ago in playlist Liked
oh and btw, glenn doesn't seem to know A THING about thomas jefferson, one of the founding fathers after all.
dogmachris 3 months ago in playlist hitchens and torture stuff
"If you eliminate god, where do the rights come from?"
That's fantastically rude. Glenn if you find out today, that there is no god, will you just go outside killing a person, just because you believe, that rights become worthless?
Of course not! But you think atheists do that, because the human primate isn't capable of deciding what's right and what not?
You should build up some self-respect big guy... for us and for our species.
dogmachris 3 months ago in playlist hitchens and torture stuff
Why is not mentioning religion and requiring government employees to not mention religion shoving our nonbelief down Glenn's throat? Nobody show this guy the intentionally blank pages in bound books (including the Bible!) or he might think publishers have an atheist agenda, too.
bicokun 3 months ago
Fuck im glad I dont live in that stupid religious crazy country called America
dickhead2905 3 months ago
What a dick
sweetlolitacookies 3 months ago
Hey the broom is more real then your god LOL
junglefresssh 3 months ago 3
Funny. This WASN'T "One nation, under God" until 1954, when that line was added to the Pledge, more than 50 years after it was written, due to the efforts of Christian lobbyists whose sole goal was to have god mentioned in the Pledge.
Ashiman12 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I like how he uses the founding fathers in talking about his inalienable rights
...the same founding fathers that put the separation of church and state into the constitution--the very thing he's infringing on!
adda241 3 months ago
Comment removed
adda241 3 months ago
"I ain't forcin' it down your throat, don't force it down mine."
Then why is "Under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance?
Also, there are no "atheist children." Unlike religious people, we understand that children are not mature enough to form an opinion on a subject like that.
overman926 3 months ago
so he (and many others) like to say this is "one nation under god" to argue that this nation is prominently a religious one; yet what they fail to realize is that 'god' wasn't added to the pledge until the 1950s. The same is for having 'in god we trust' on money
StealYoGirl699 3 months ago
First off the 10 % is bullied around by the 90%, beck. Secondly, I have read the federalist papers and your constitution (not an american myself) . It doesnt say one nation under god. Why doesnt he talk to an atheist about this?
toverkleet 3 months ago
glenn beck is the BIGGEST IDIOT IN THE WORLD (:
deathmagnetic13 3 months ago
1:36 Why did they use a clip of Glenn Beck?
BlackHoleBird 3 months ago
'i aint forcing it down your throat' The irony of this whole news report, his beliefs and that quote is fucking hilarious.
tomwiddv2 4 months ago
The problem with people like Glenn Beck is that they foster the false belief that the US was founded by Christians, for Christians.
The fact is that 'under god' was not introduced to the pledge of allegience until the 1950s, when the government wanted a way of differentiating the US from the USSR. it also took almost 100 years after the country was formed for 'in god we trust' to appear on coinage.
The 1st amendment guarantees freedom of/from religion. Religion is supposed to be private.
BigManFromThe80s 4 months ago
@BigManFromThe80s The concept of a freedom from religion is either meaningless or an affront to the actual freedoms of speech and religious exercise.
Whether 'under God' was added to the Pledge in the 50's is irrelevant
This nation has ways acknowledged God in various ways.
The 1st Congress requested Pres Washington "to recommend to the People of the United States a day of public thanksgiving and prayer to be observed by acknowledging with grateful hearts the many signal favors of Almighty God"
nnjhansen 3 months ago
Anyone notice Glenn scratching his head like an ape at 3:58?
Jnet9102 4 months ago
@Jnet9102 Not until I read it on reddit.
defiythelie 4 months ago
@defiythelie Lol, yeah, I just posted that XD
Jnet9102 4 months ago
WOW! If you want to worship a broom, Glenn Beck COULD really care less. So that must mean that he does care. Aww, thank you Glenn.
10 seconds in, Beck already sounds like an idiot.
chadd990 4 months ago
James Dobson looks like he could be the leader of the Gestapo.
PompousPreacher 4 months ago
@lucymydog1995
I'm sorry! I'm sure there's plenty more asinine religious comments to point out though! ;-)
TheDoomProgram 4 months ago
worship a broom?
umm WTF
judicum 4 months ago
"i don't force it down your throat."
That's pretty much what every christian everywhere does (sometimes violently). lol.
TheDoomProgram 4 months ago
@TheDoomProgram damnit you stole my comment! lol.
lucymydog1995 4 months ago
Are christian children so sensitive that when they can't pray they cry?
MrC0MPUT3R 4 months ago
Glenn Beck makes children cry.
SatanTheUnbeliever 4 months ago
90%?
The last study I read said about 60% of Americans believe in God,but since when did facts matter to Fox News?
I love when Christians act like they are pushed around,or that they are the victims.
Politicallyactive101 4 months ago
@Politicallyactive101 What study did you read?
The polls and surveys on the question consistently put the percentage of Americans that believe in God in the 89-95% range.
Seems it is you who is ignoring facts.
nnjhansen 4 months ago
@Politicallyactive101 Source?
mynameisjonas45 4 months ago
Hey Glenn, despite the fact that our Founding Fathers wrote "one nation under God", it was still men that wrote our laws. The state continues to write laws and uphold them through our justice system. These are all men and women, not God. How can you argue against that, you friggin moron?
7scorpio7 4 months ago
I stopped getting offended along time ago by Glen's...ugh words of patriotism..I think youtube is in agreement that he is a source of entertainment and nothing more as seen by from the amounts of thumbs down he gets on every posted video of him. To say you're offended by Glen beck is extremely redundant.
lonogugeadult 4 months ago
Hey Jimbo, he isn't goofy. he's a closet gay.
he looks like a guy that'd take it..
M0j0S0D0pe420 4 months ago
This dumb fuck doesn't even believe in the same God that the majority of citizens do, he is a fucking MORMON. smh
distillednikki 4 months ago
Glenn, All Children are Atheists.
ih8makinusernames 4 months ago
@ih8makinusernames
Unfortunately,by age 5,they're not.
Childhood indoctrination is a human rights violation and will one day be universally seen as such.
BCT071 4 months ago
one day in the distant future, religious peoples will be a historical joke
SymMetRyRteMmyS 4 months ago
@SymMetRyRteMmyS
Not too distant i hope.
BCT071 4 months ago
Hey, I was just wondering, is this the biggest cunt on American tv?
johnny207 4 months ago
Nation "under God"?
That phrase was added to the pledge of allegiance in response to the soviet union's atheist government! God is a myth!
HepburnFlicks 4 months ago
I don't want the, to ban the word "prayer" in schools; I want to talk about how stupid "prayer" is.
MrAnagern 4 months ago
"Leave God alone."
He's a big boy, I'm sure he can take it.
Noise509 4 months ago
In this ONE case, I agree with Glenn Beck. I'm an atheist, and know that public school-led prayer is unconstitutional, and should be banned. However, I disagree with the judge's ruling that the moment of silence should be banned because someone might pray. There's nothing wrong with praying in school. There IS something wrong with public school-led prayer.
joshtube9 4 months ago
GLENN BECK IS A FUCKING IDIOT.
Caseyblahblahblah123 4 months ago
Wow, you yanks really need the BBC.
johnny207 4 months ago
@johnny207 Why??
nnjhansen 4 months ago
Yup, I worship a broom. I can see a broom, I can touch/feel a broom. It's there. it helps me remove dry leaves from my porch. It helps me keep my house safe from stray cats and raccoons. I'm thankful for the broom. And just like god, the broom is an Atheist like me.
Noise509 4 months ago
is this actually a news channel? who watches this shit?
mechupanlamonda 4 months ago 39
@mechupanlamonda - I actually watch Fox News so I can laugh and stupid people like Glenn Beck
davy209 4 months ago
@davy209 is good because people can make parodies, or simple use it as an example of what is not a news channel. indeed this people are hillarious.
mechupanlamonda 4 months ago
@mechupanlamonda- I absolutely agree with you, for me, it doesn't matter if I like him or hate him (I think he's an idiot) but Glen Beck is so stupidly entertaining, I consider his show is similar to Jackass (Nothing but mindless entertainment)
davy209 4 months ago
@davy209 agreed.
mechupanlamonda 4 months ago
@mechupanlamonda your watching it!!!!!!!!!
Malcom123X 3 months ago
@Malcom123X no, i'm watching a video clip on youtube.
mechupanlamonda 3 months ago
I wonder if he'd be fine with listing "attempting to summon satan" under what they could do during the moment of silence.
fudrick43 4 months ago
worship a broom? um, glen, i dont think you know this but atheist dont believe in anything! that includes fairytales.
lebronjamesXD 4 months ago
Wow, people actually watch this bullshit.
kemoblue4u 4 months ago
Glenn Beck is a fucken idiot!
stones26 4 months ago
Either God exists, or we don't have inalienable rights.
Sick false dichotomy, bro.
itstonymacaroni 4 months ago
@itstonymacaroni
The rights that exist in your country or mine don't necessarily hold true outside of our nation's borders.
All human rights are human made.
Like God.
BCT071 4 months ago 34
Comment removed
itstonymacaroni 4 months ago
@BCT071 Wow, really? I honestly thought that rights were universal and that we were endowed by a magical creator with them. Thanks for setting me straight.
itstonymacaroni 4 months ago
@itstonymacaroni
xD
BCT071 4 months ago
@BCT071 You're a dumb person.
SuperSam424 3 months ago