Slowly, people ARE starting to realize what Fox and other media outlets are all about... It's time for the News to be News again. 3 part solution: 1. Every channel must provide a 1 hour News program WITHOUT COMMERCIALS. 2. News programs should not be rated by any Ratings system. 3. All News Channels live by the same rules, but are "Pay TV" for revenues as opposed to advertising.
It's really sad that this terribly scary video is one of your least viewed.
Your video on marijuana (witch wile informative wasn't near as important as this one) got 379,100 views.
PS I'm glad to always see lots of dislikes on your vids it means that even though they disagree with you hopefully some of them will at least question things like Fox "news".
I care!!! I don't know how many people care, but I care... and the square root of 1 percent of a given population can make a difference. so keep caring and keep encouraging people to make a difference.
its cool and all. that you did this. i like your video's your a great deep thinker, i like that.
thing is i have nothing too hide. infact i makes me hard thinking someone might be listening too me on the phone. and its not like i have something too hide, honestly. i have not a single thing to hide if they wanna know my dick size let them listen, if they wanna know what i ate for breakfast let them. if they wanna hear about my boring ass life much like most peeps.. then let them listen. fuck it
Fuck, watching Fox News always makes me so glad I don't live in America. Seriously, to all those Americans that see through the obvious bullshit that FN spins every day, how do you manage to not go totally fucking postal everyday?
I live in America, and it makes me go fucking nuts....The worst thing is there is no such thing as fair and balanced news. And fox is the most blantant proof of that
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
According to world DNA expert Francis Collins, DNA evidence alone overwhelmingly indicates deliberate design and not random processes.
According to Thomas Jefferson and every signer of the Declaration of Independence, the evidence for design is beyond all rational doubt.
So, why doesn't the ACLU fight for the right of the scientific opinion of Francis Collins and every signer of the Declaration to be included in a modern science textbook?
I am neither a Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal, nor do I wish to be any of these "soapbox" terms. I'm in favor of everyone with equal credentials being able to teach what they believe the evidence idicates in a public class. I agree with Jefferson, whether someone believes in 20 gods or no God, freedom of speech is "freedom" for a teacher to say what they believe the evidence indicates; Jefferson believed it overwhelmingly indicates Creator; that is what "self-evident" means.
Actually it's argued that Jefferson was a secularist, or even an atheist.
As for what you say about teachers teaching whatever they want. I do not agree, there should be some law (and THERE IS) to dictate a standard of learning. If not everyone would be learning totally different things. People would be preaching about the earth flooding a few thousand years ago...oh wait they do. Darn Christian schools messing things up.
It's a total invention of atheists that Jefferson was like them. Jefferson very clearly set himself apart from atheism in the Declaration, as did Thomas Paine in his various writings. To distrust religion, as some but by no means all of the founding fathers did, is not at all the same thing as atheism. Many European deists believed in a personal inter-active God above and apart from religion, which appears to be true regarding both Paine & Jefferson; Jefferson's last letter references God.
I'm afraid just referencing God is not enough to say they believe in them. Stephen Hawking, Einstein, even Richard Dawkins all reference God, but do they (did they) believe in them? No. They didn't. Thomas Jefferson would have a totally different view on design if he was around today. Also the signers of the deceleration knew about the importance of religion but also knew it should not interfere with the state. Keep church and state separate please. -That was to your earlier comment on this vid
Dawkins goes to incredibly imbecillic lengths to prove what any moron already knows, that he is just a liar, inventing fiction not found in evidence. On the other hand, I have a long list of quotes from Einstein (see Britannica bio and Walter Isaacson bio) claiming he believed in God. You cannot speak for Jefferson; only someone's own words speak for them. You have no idea what Jefferson would our would not believe if he were around today. Like Dawkins, your's just making it up as you go.
The Declaration mentions God at least five separate times and closes asking for God's blessing on the revolutionary cause. Thus by default, every signer of the Declaration were signing that they believed in God, whether you like it or not. There is ZERO evidence that any founding father was either an agnostic or an atheist. And, "church", "religion" and "God" were three different distinct ideas in the the 18th Century, whether or not you and/or the ACLU pretends otherwise.
When I first heard about this on NPR, I about shit myself. As if the Patriot act wasnt bad enough this had to come around and stab us in the face. 1984 here we come. I just hope the ACLU finds a way to reverse it.
do you believe that this FIZA incident and its succesfulness could have led to the PARTRIOT act and also, is there any similar evidence linking a type of news coverup or misinformation campaign to put the hush hush on it and mislead the american public from its "Fine print" type agenda
By the way, EVERYONE on the internet can be reasonably believed to be outside the US since the government could say that any terrorist with half a brain would use a high anonymous proxy located in the US when communicating over the internet.
Can't anyone in your country sue Faux News for misleading viewers? Or take Congress and/or the administration to court, or challenge this revised law in supreme court? Are any qualified persons trying to do this, and if not, is it simply because they fear reprisals, or think they will not succeed? Wasn't your country founded by people who fought seemingly insurmountable odds?
i personally agree and disagree with you. You are right on with the whole conservative/fox news spin on the new law. However, i am not sure that privacy is nessesarily all that great. i am currently tryign to figure out my own stance on privacy and to an extent you can say "who cares if some government lacky can view what i do". i think the question is more directed on what they can do with that information and if anyone has access to the records of some one they know.
Real Republicans (Ron Paul and Robert Taft, for example) are against any of these wiretaps. The reason why most republicans are for these surveilance laws (Protect America Act, etc.) is because most republicans are bought and sold; it's also because a few people, known as the NeoConservatives, have highjacked Republican Foreign Policy.
best reporting ive ever heard while seeing the fox news symbol on the screen, keep up good work. only chance reps have is to make obama out to be the antichrist(don't worry they're already on it.)
As a US citizen that lives outside the US I make calls or get calls from family up in the US almost everyday. I care tremendously that someone could be listening in on my conversation. I feel violated.
sheerterror77:'One time I cut off my pubes, dyed them blue.' You sound like a lot of fun at a party.
Lest we don't understand the larger picture.
How about a merger conversation? How about a stock about to be bought by a hedge fund or ? How about a great new invention? How about listening in on the Dems schemeing on how to win a seat or the Presidency?
Yeah- Like Nixon and Watergate! Except Bush is wiretapping THE WHOLE USA!
The amnesty is so they don't testify AGAINST HIM!
I think that they shouldn't be tapping in on phone conversations. EVen though it is a supposed measure for our safety, and who cares what George Bush hears about some High-Schoolers crush, it still is a major violation of our privacy. Not everyone who lives outside the US is an evil terrorist!
I am a republican and I am 100% against george bush and against faux news.I am a republican but do not agree how repubs are voting/conducting themselves today.They have strayed far from their original conservative principals. Thats why I am backing Ron Paul
Why is Fox news considered by some people to be a credible news show? It just doesn't make any sense to me! As LiberalViewer points out in many of his videos, you just need to pay a little attention to find a great number of errors in the Fox news "reports"
Yes Fox News lies, but I think a majority of politically minded people know that. Still, there is a good number of people whom I'm sure still believe them. I also think people have stopped caring about some of their constitutional rights. They think that they don't have anything to worry about because they aren't terrorists, but the truth is anyone who the government says is a terrorist IS a terrorist.
I'm completely in the dark on this one, LV. I never get e-mails or phone calls from international persons, but on the other hand, my girlfriend gets them all the time from former foreign-exchange students. So the gov't could tap her e-mail or cell-phone, and listen in to the convo's between her and I, or read the e-mails between her and I... So I could be unknowingly involved, just as she would be. Why does this crap keep getting passed through congress?
Im 50 and ive never seen any president have this much unrestricted power to just about do anything he wants, say anything and conjur up false enemies. In any other country he would have been run out of office a long time ago. They even defied the UN about going to war against Iraq.
The sad part is that so many of us are sssooo not caring or willing to just be sheeples. When a news company delivers a vlog on ONE woman who says "oh sure i'll take the chip implant (so the govt can monitor every time i fart or move)anything for my families security..." It sends the message 'argumentum ad poplum' and we go for it? Its not the news so much as the willing compliance of the citizens of this once great country.
Where is your video about Dan Rather's bias and The NY times Liberal tendancies.CNN,CBS,NBC,PBS,VH1,MTV,Comedy Central, they all lean left. FOX is less Liberal but will never offset the bias in these other networks.
If u can find evidence of ideological bias like Ive shown at Fox News coming from those other media outlets, feel free to make a video proving your point. For DOZENS of videos proving MY point that Fox News is consistently biased, see my Fox News Bias YouTube playlist at:
"Can't anyone in your country sue Faux News for misleading viewers? Or take Congress and/or the administration to court, or challenge this revised law in supreme court? Are any qualified persons trying to do this, and if not, is it simply because they fear reprisals, or think they will not succeed? Wasn't your country founded by people who fought seemingly insurmountable odds?"
"Can't anyone in your country sue Faux News for misleading viewers? Or take Congress and/or the administration to court, or challenge this revised law in supreme court? Are any qualified persons trying to do this, and if not, is it simply because they fear reprisals, or think they will not succeed? Wasn't your country founded by people who fought seemingly insurmountable odds?
One, have you ever confronted Fox with these charges?
and
Two, does Fox give a hoot?
Seriously, this is a major distinction. Especially if there was debate over the language being "terrorist" or merely "foreign." Do you think Fox is intentionally misleading the public to make the policy more acceptable?
and yes they do but i think people today dont know what it is like to fend for them selves live with out a king... do what they want with the freedom they have insted.. they throw it away i think it is because we work all the day time, and we ahve forgoten what it is like to be wild
"They fawningly give praise and swear their indebtedness to what they percieve as truth being imparted to them" gave me the impresion that you felt that this guy is some indoctrinating force.
Dahlia Lithwick is my go-to journalist on Constitutional matters; I try not to miss her posts. She's at Slate.
Not all Republicans have abandoned strict constitutionalism - just the neocons. But corporate money is mostly flowing to the neocons, and the neocons have a lot of media sewed up, too. Traditionalists have been elbowed to the sidelines.
Your comment about data mining and filtering is right on in my mind. I knew that collecting data creates power long ago. Any good investor of money knows that knowledge is power.See "Wall Street" the movie. The Nazis in Germany knew it. The gov't saves all data and mines it no doubt. I'm scared! For sure!!
Thanks for this LiberalViewer! I already knew that the Fox propaganda machine was just that, but it is really nice to see someone seperate some of them out and call them on it.
I would like to agree with you, BurtonxFan. Historically, Republicans were indeed strict constitutionalists, for the most part. But neocons are not Goldwater Republicans.
Goldwater Republicans never favored suspension of habeas corpus, foreign adventures, Supreme Court interference with states conducting elections, warrantless interception of citizens' private communications.
Not to mention veritable a flood of signing statements which alter or suspend laws passed by the legislature, and a broad attempt to curtail Congress' constitutional oversight role, under the novel "Unitary Executive" theory. By no stretch of the imagination can any of this be considered strict constitutionalism.
George W. Bush himself said "the Constitution is just a piece of paper." Goldwater would have been amazed at what has happened to his party.
gmail reads all of your e-mails, they say that its just so that they can provide personalized ads in the sidebar, but they could definitely do some serious spying.
even i had forgotten about the most recent attack on our civil liberties, but i do remember hearing about it from--you guessed it--the colbert report. this video doesn't surprise me at all, especially Fox's use of the word "terrorist." i'm pretty sure there's some kind of rule for stories about wiretapping that they have to use "terrorist" somewhere in the story.
I *think* it works this way: they collect everything that passes through one of their switch connection points and store it.
Once stored, they run a high-level filter to pick out things of interest, then mine deep. But they keep the raw data, because they may want to go back and look for something else.
If that's wrong, how would we ever know? There are no checks and balances. None.
Funny how LiberalViewer says Democraps were "bamboozled" into signing this crime into law. As if they're so dumb they don't know how to read a bill. Get it through your head dude, they want the power to be there when they take office too.
Just to clarify, I appreciate the work of LiberalViewer to bring this propagandizing bs to more peoples' attention. But if anyone thinks the Dems are innocent in all this, they are sorely mistaken.
I care deeply. This is an assault on the Constitution and on democracy.
I'd like to pose a third question, Allen. Does the Government's sweeping spy program really limit itself to collecting communications with persons in other countries?
I don't think so. I think they sweep up *everything* and then put it through data mining. Once they have the data, they can mine anything without court supervision under the new law.
isn't congress supposed to keep the presidents decisions in check? if the congress thinks he's transgressing the constitution, aren't they supposed to reject? sorry, I know very little of American law.
as your name says, wake up america, patriotism and the idea of the patriot is long shadowed. Use common sense, it's healthier when your smart enough to know what's good for you. That's why it's important to go to college and do a major, any major.
Your partially right but I think the distraction is propaganda and the illusion is actually a delusion. Fox news is the butt of transparent propaganda jokes throughout the world. If I must watch propaganda I'd rather watch one with a liberal bias because after all reality has a liberal bias. It is rather depressing that the press has turned on its citizens and caved to lobbying groups and corporations though....... and I'm talking to you too CNN!
Wow that means I am now on notice that all my comments on youtube are being being printed out and some one is reading them and making data analysis of those words. I am happy to have others looking at my comments.
It's another way the man limits the people and censor our lives just a little more until we're all just a bunch of conservatives that believe our life always was as said so by god and that science is just a myth used by terrorists.
The idea of the american is that we are impervious. Few realize how much danger any one of us could be in at any one moment. This law expansion is giving more power over our free lives and under the wrong hands could lead americans into an age of fear of state. If they can track us without a warrent what's to stop them from apprehending a liberal such as yourself.
Fourth Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
Watching Faux news is the adult equivalent to sticking your fingers in your ears yelling "lalala, I cant hear you" so as to deny something you just aren't mentally developed enough to cope with.
My girl and I are avid FOX viewers. Thanks for pointing out this small but interesting bias of our news in the US. But do you really think that this is such a huge pivot in power? I think yes and no.
yeah i hear you man i avoid fox news and another great video Liberal Viewer...thanks for the links to the laws i was trying to find to fully understand the new law in place
Corporate Media sucks! "Fuck corporate Media", this is what you say when the media is working near you, so that they cannot spread live propaganda! Spying is wrong and they must be getting paranoid, so keep spreading the word.
i LOVE you LV. you said what i wrote in your pervious video:"People don't give a damn" about these stuff anymore. Unfortunately some politically-corrected morons attacked me, accusing me of being a liar and child molester! People of United States don't care about anything that happens to them anymore. i hope this government takes away huge chunk of their freedom and does everything in his power to destroy the very foundation of this society. Perhaps then people MAY wake the fuck up.
I tend to agree with FairMinded here though about Democratic compliance with passing this terrible bill. (NB. I'm a life-long Dem).
The important thing here is that this is only a six month bill. It can, and should be rewritten. Everyone write your congress-critters and demand this be fixed. Acceptance of this bill means the terrorists have won!
and you have the umitigated balls to assume this person, who has taken HIS time to expose lies purported by our so called journalists(THIS ELLICITS NO RESPONSE FROM YOU THOUGH?!), would 'be screaming' blame, & to whom?...please think...our country is depending on it.
you sold out your countrymen for a hypathetical attack that may or may not have hurt or killed 1,000's of people..for one that definetly has killed 100,000's
WTF?
THOSE WHO WOULD COMPROMISE FREEDOM FOR SECURITY DESERVE NEITHER!bf
listen here slar..im from NYC I had a meeting a few blocks away at10am 9/11-My father takes the train 2x a day my sister brother in law and husband commute, using the bridges and highways EVERYDAY..my friends and family live in the city.
I would take the risk of another attack over killing 100,000's of people.
you just dont make sense, save your hysterics for the simple minded & you wont find them here.
How was the Democratic congress "bamboozled"? Are they dumber than the average politically aware citizen who knew this was a bad deal?
I think the Dems WANT such power for when they are in office. Then, as always happens, the Dems will be spewing the glories and benefits of their special powers and suddenly Republicans will be the ones who care about the constitution and limits on power.
Dont you guys get it...The republicans and democrats are the same...All this is just cannon faughter....A little game they play to keep you entertained. Keep you off the real topics, the Democrat's would have gladly subverted the U.S. constitution just like them if given the chance to take more power over the people. In fact they supported Bush on these key issues. Sheep......
THE FEDERAL LAW IS ALREADY IN PLACE TO PUT THE RFID CHIP IN US in MAY 2008!
ANYONE THAT won't ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN WILL BE PUT IN PRISON CAMPS that ARE ALREADY IN PLACE WAITING FOR new ARRIVALS LIKE US. They WILL NEVER CHIP ME! I will DIE AND TAKE OUT AS MANY OF THEM AS I CAN WITH ME!
DOUGLAS BICKFORD
541-840-3699
AMERICAN INDIAN
BIBLE AND KORAN AND TORAH ARE LIES TO CONTROL US THROUGH FEAR OF HELL AND GODS WRATH!
FAUX News has already succeeded (first question) because the American people have become compacent sheep (2nd question) accepting whatever they are told without argument. It is alarming how far we have fallen since the activism of the 60's and early 70's. The Me Generation is regrettably most consumed about themselves, or vicariously living through our celebrity culture.
Oh kids, don't you know that the goverment has been listening and watching without warrarnts for a very long time. Warrants are just things they need when they take someone to court and do the legal dance. This ain't new. It's just public.
It is still unconstitutional. I don't support elected officials that SAY it is okay to violate the constitution. I call unconstitutional government tyranny.
Fascism won, we lose. See you in the work camps. Oh if a government agent comes knocking on your door at 2:00am, to take you into custody and ship you to a "camp" with out a warrant, against your will, and in violation of the U.S. Constitution, exercise your constitutional right to put a bullet in their head.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Who cares? I could care less if the government listens to my calls to the Middle East, or even reads my email. You people are worrying about ghosts. If the Bush administration had evil intentions, they would not be asking Congress for permission.
They're *not* asking Congress for "permission". They used to asked the GOP to rubberstamp everything they wanted, but now that the R's are no longer in charge of Congress, they fight to peel off about 10 Democrats, coupled with the Repub rubberstamp, and get their illegal programs passed. And don't get me started on just what rights you are SO willing to give up.
Tell me what rights do the dead have? People howl about the Patriot Act like it changed their lives in some way. I accept the risks of giving the government more flexibility in fighting terrorism. I will not accept the risks of being blown up on a plane or a bus at all. Since I am doing nothing wrong, I have nothing to fear.
So, say the president's people want to spy on the opposition party... imagine they learn of valuable political strategy and use the knowledge to unfairly defeat the opposition. Does that scare you?
It's about OVERSIGHT. The old FISA laws allowed the executive branch to do ANYTHING they wanted and ask for a warrant up to 72 hours later. It's not a matter of giving the executive branch TOTAL power to do anything without oversight -OR- protect the country.
The Clinton's have done that. The Democrats have done that. Remember the infamous cell call that just happened to be recorded by a "elderly couple" ? I am not worried about the government taping my phone illegally, or looking at my library records. IF there are abuses, they will be dealt with. So far, I have not seen anything about abuses of these tools, only hypothetical problems.
the signs are obvious, the clues are many - and the fools that inhabit this world will still ignore them. sheeple are the weapon of monstrous governments, and you sir - are the perfect sheeple.
I remember when Republicans DISTRUSTED the government and coveted it's privacy. But now, pardon my French, but I've never met a bigger bunch of whiny-babies as today's GOP: "Search my home! Listen in on my phone calls! Read my email! Whatever you have to do, just save me from the nasty terrorists!"
congrats my friend, you are the perfect tool of your oppressive government - you are exactly what they are working for. Do not doubt that these new laws will be used against the american people in the not so distant future, do not doubt that when the curtain falls on this fascist movement these laws will be used to find and eliminate those who oppose your "great" government.
I don't understand why some republican look at this as "why is it a big deal, unless you're a terrorist." ...but when the government tries to tighten gun laws they scream "the government is trying to take control of us!!! we need our guns in case they try to control us!!!" Don't they see, that that never happens radically? It happens bit by bit starting with things like this.
1. Fox can tell its viewers anything. People who watch Fox are twits. They are scared of the terrorists and the communists and the extremists. So they will make a big controlling government that will conquer the world and get the bad guys. 2. People will not care until there is no panem et circenses.
No - just stop state-sponsored "trade" on behalf of corporations. We fight wars and force trade for corporate interests. Government needs to get OUT of business. Make corporate charitable contributions public and open. Allow the people to decide where they want to shop. Don't allow federal food labeling limiting the information we are provided on the food we eat in defense of efficiency. No more government sleeping with corporations. This is what Ron Paul believes.- peterson5523
the last question about whether USAmericans even care about the government eavesdropping on them is very appropriate but old hat. do the usamericans care about stolen presidential elections? no. do they care about being lied into wars? no. do they mind having a one party system? no. do they care who wins a baseball game? yes
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Unless you're a terrorist planning on death and destruction somewhere in the US, then what is all of you guys problem? Do you think they give a hoot about your everyday normal life? What gets me is the terrorists who want to get us hates and wants to stop everything you guys want. They're ultra religious, they're against women's rights, they're against free speech, all of it that you get to do or voice here. And you're helping them.. unbelievable.
my gawd are you not listening?? firejack007 This has nothing to do with terrorists, it's gaining control of us, removing our liberties. Wire taps on "suspected terrorists" has very broad language and can spill over on all of us. FISA clearly states a president has the right to wiretap a suspect if needed immediately. A warrant must be applied for within 72 hours after. So what is the big important issue for these guys to not get a warrant, except to not leave a paper trail.
I think it is funny how this is made out to be part of some kind of partisan agenda. We now have one party. The Republicrat party doesn't care about our civil liberties. They are fed agendas and talking points for the purpose of dividing this country's peoples. It has worked. People readily spew whatever the media feeds them without any tolerance for debate. It always turns into name calling and cheerleading your side.
Not to say that it's totally to blame, but TV plays into that big time. So many programs are "all conflict, all the time", pitting one person or party against another (ex. good vs evil, right vs wrong, etc). Nuanced debate gets shafted in favor of, as Jon Stewart put it, "'Hardball' or 'Crossfire' or 'I'm Gonna Kick Your Ass'". It helps set the level of discourse at a place that encourages flamewars and stubborn posturing. In other words, reading is fundamental.
This has been flagged as spam show
Slowly, people ARE starting to realize what Fox and other media outlets are all about... It's time for the News to be News again. 3 part solution: 1. Every channel must provide a 1 hour News program WITHOUT COMMERCIALS. 2. News programs should not be rated by any Ratings system. 3. All News Channels live by the same rules, but are "Pay TV" for revenues as opposed to advertising.
Bawbster1 8 months ago in playlist Fox News Bias
@LiberalViewer
It's really sad that this terribly scary video is one of your least viewed.
Your video on marijuana (witch wile informative wasn't near as important as this one) got 379,100 views.
PS I'm glad to always see lots of dislikes on your vids it means that even though they disagree with you hopefully some of them will at least question things like Fox "news".
Keep up the good work
Tyjohnable 1 year ago
I care!!! I don't know how many people care, but I care... and the square root of 1 percent of a given population can make a difference. so keep caring and keep encouraging people to make a difference.
ryuenden 1 year ago
So, #UN#, how did Obama do in the SOTU the other night?
davisfleetwood 2 years ago
Rock and Roll the meaning:
1) REACT
2) MARRIAGE then COMFORT RANK
(instant money printing, laugh prints instant, prof kid, bit0h, 3000 days celibate, no guilt by association, cherry)
ans:safe engineering (maple graphing) use functions for distirbution.
KristinaBrooker 2 years ago
its cool and all. that you did this. i like your video's your a great deep thinker, i like that.
thing is i have nothing too hide. infact i makes me hard thinking someone might be listening too me on the phone. and its not like i have something too hide, honestly. i have not a single thing to hide if they wanna know my dick size let them listen, if they wanna know what i ate for breakfast let them. if they wanna hear about my boring ass life much like most peeps.. then let them listen. fuck it
ImoonFIREspam 2 years ago
its just about having nothing to hide for you?
well then, why not place a armed checkpoint on your street. how about you agree to random searches of your home.
guess you dont mind laws allowing any american to be held with out charge.
where do you draw the line?
lejink 2 years ago
Fuck, watching Fox News always makes me so glad I don't live in America. Seriously, to all those Americans that see through the obvious bullshit that FN spins every day, how do you manage to not go totally fucking postal everyday?
Mandozza 2 years ago
That is why Thinking Americans call it Faux News!
justinjade 2 years ago
I live in America, and it makes me go fucking nuts....The worst thing is there is no such thing as fair and balanced news. And fox is the most blantant proof of that
TheGuitarman1025 2 years ago
why was it ok with americans to start giving up their rights?
akvalues 2 years ago
its stupid how ur videos keep on playing each other! damn!
abdi5501boone 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
According to world DNA expert Francis Collins, DNA evidence alone overwhelmingly indicates deliberate design and not random processes.
According to Thomas Jefferson and every signer of the Declaration of Independence, the evidence for design is beyond all rational doubt.
So, why doesn't the ACLU fight for the right of the scientific opinion of Francis Collins and every signer of the Declaration to be included in a modern science textbook?
How about Newton's design opinion?
ACLU=Liar
richardaberdeen 2 years ago
i guess you fine with losing some of your rights ?
akvalues 2 years ago
I am neither a Democrat or Republican, conservative or liberal, nor do I wish to be any of these "soapbox" terms. I'm in favor of everyone with equal credentials being able to teach what they believe the evidence idicates in a public class. I agree with Jefferson, whether someone believes in 20 gods or no God, freedom of speech is "freedom" for a teacher to say what they believe the evidence indicates; Jefferson believed it overwhelmingly indicates Creator; that is what "self-evident" means.
richardaberdeen 2 years ago
Actually it's argued that Jefferson was a secularist, or even an atheist.
As for what you say about teachers teaching whatever they want. I do not agree, there should be some law (and THERE IS) to dictate a standard of learning. If not everyone would be learning totally different things. People would be preaching about the earth flooding a few thousand years ago...oh wait they do. Darn Christian schools messing things up.
Xirbtt 2 years ago
It's a total invention of atheists that Jefferson was like them. Jefferson very clearly set himself apart from atheism in the Declaration, as did Thomas Paine in his various writings. To distrust religion, as some but by no means all of the founding fathers did, is not at all the same thing as atheism. Many European deists believed in a personal inter-active God above and apart from religion, which appears to be true regarding both Paine & Jefferson; Jefferson's last letter references God.
richardaberdeen 2 years ago
I'm afraid just referencing God is not enough to say they believe in them. Stephen Hawking, Einstein, even Richard Dawkins all reference God, but do they (did they) believe in them? No. They didn't. Thomas Jefferson would have a totally different view on design if he was around today. Also the signers of the deceleration knew about the importance of religion but also knew it should not interfere with the state. Keep church and state separate please. -That was to your earlier comment on this vid
Xirbtt 2 years ago
Dawkins goes to incredibly imbecillic lengths to prove what any moron already knows, that he is just a liar, inventing fiction not found in evidence. On the other hand, I have a long list of quotes from Einstein (see Britannica bio and Walter Isaacson bio) claiming he believed in God. You cannot speak for Jefferson; only someone's own words speak for them. You have no idea what Jefferson would our would not believe if he were around today. Like Dawkins, your's just making it up as you go.
richardaberdeen 2 years ago
The Declaration mentions God at least five separate times and closes asking for God's blessing on the revolutionary cause. Thus by default, every signer of the Declaration were signing that they believed in God, whether you like it or not. There is ZERO evidence that any founding father was either an agnostic or an atheist. And, "church", "religion" and "God" were three different distinct ideas in the the 18th Century, whether or not you and/or the ACLU pretends otherwise.
richardaberdeen 2 years ago
When I first heard about this on NPR, I about shit myself. As if the Patriot act wasnt bad enough this had to come around and stab us in the face. 1984 here we come. I just hope the ACLU finds a way to reverse it.
raltaki 3 years ago
how did bush make the time to get his dick sucked by fox news between fucking up the economy and licking dick cheneys ass.
grkpektis 3 years ago
Fixed News is SO pathetic!
throwback2now 3 years ago 2
An atheist hired an attorney to bring a discrimination case. The case was
brought before a judge. After listening to the passionate presentation by
the lawyer, the judge banged his gavel declaring,"Case dismissed!" "The calendar says April 1st is April Fools Day. Psalm 14:1
states, 'The fool says in his heart, there is no God.' Thus, it is the
opinion of this court, that if your client says there is no God, then he is
a fool. Therefore, April 1st is his day.
3scottiemom 3 years ago
Whats next Video cameras in our homes?
NInjas0 3 years ago
mmm kinky.
JimmiBaez 3 years ago
do you believe that this FIZA incident and its succesfulness could have led to the PARTRIOT act and also, is there any similar evidence linking a type of news coverup or misinformation campaign to put the hush hush on it and mislead the american public from its "Fine print" type agenda
EricEqualsMCSquared 3 years ago
By the way, EVERYONE on the internet can be reasonably believed to be outside the US since the government could say that any terrorist with half a brain would use a high anonymous proxy located in the US when communicating over the internet.
dodopod 3 years ago
No. We have a right to privacy covered under the 14th amendment...
annpetasupporter 3 years ago
Can't anyone in your country sue Faux News for misleading viewers? Or take Congress and/or the administration to court, or challenge this revised law in supreme court? Are any qualified persons trying to do this, and if not, is it simply because they fear reprisals, or think they will not succeed? Wasn't your country founded by people who fought seemingly insurmountable odds?
vancouver76 3 years ago 9
it seems as though the status quo has become that of indifference, there aren't enough people that are willing to do anything about it
FlanField 3 years ago 2
i personally agree and disagree with you. You are right on with the whole conservative/fox news spin on the new law. However, i am not sure that privacy is nessesarily all that great. i am currently tryign to figure out my own stance on privacy and to an extent you can say "who cares if some government lacky can view what i do". i think the question is more directed on what they can do with that information and if anyone has access to the records of some one they know.
drewgarl 3 years ago
Real Republicans (Ron Paul and Robert Taft, for example) are against any of these wiretaps. The reason why most republicans are for these surveilance laws (Protect America Act, etc.) is because most republicans are bought and sold; it's also because a few people, known as the NeoConservatives, have highjacked Republican Foreign Policy.
okayillgonow 3 years ago 2
Barry Goldwater is spinning in his grave.
hithazel 2 years ago
best reporting ive ever heard while seeing the fox news symbol on the screen, keep up good work. only chance reps have is to make obama out to be the antichrist(don't worry they're already on it.)
yuothineyesasian 3 years ago
I hate Fox News, It's full of idiots who are biased and like to run there mouth. I'd totally like to slap Ann Coulter in the face.
akatsukimember123 3 years ago 5
As a US citizen that lives outside the US I make calls or get calls from family up in the US almost everyday. I care tremendously that someone could be listening in on my conversation. I feel violated.
makeyanoticeme 3 years ago 3
fox news are a bunch of douche bags i don't think the new law is even a big deal, why don't they just state the facts fucking retards
grkpektis 3 years ago
lol, fox's keyword is 'terrorist'.
iamth3stig 4 years ago
sheerterror77:'One time I cut off my pubes, dyed them blue.' You sound like a lot of fun at a party.
Lest we don't understand the larger picture.
How about a merger conversation? How about a stock about to be bought by a hedge fund or ? How about a great new invention? How about listening in on the Dems schemeing on how to win a seat or the Presidency?
Yeah- Like Nixon and Watergate! Except Bush is wiretapping THE WHOLE USA!
The amnesty is so they don't testify AGAINST HIM!
lldenney 4 years ago
Oh George Orwell, when will you return from the dead to save us all?
mgefantom 4 years ago
I feel the need to take a shit and send it to FOX News. Let's all do it!
wiredcoder 4 years ago
I think that they shouldn't be tapping in on phone conversations. EVen though it is a supposed measure for our safety, and who cares what George Bush hears about some High-Schoolers crush, it still is a major violation of our privacy. Not everyone who lives outside the US is an evil terrorist!
paisleythehpfan 4 years ago
George Bush said he didn't even think it was important to find Bin Laden, so it might be that you aren't looking too hard.
Your point here might mean that the government shouldn't put surveillance on everyone since they failed to show any advantage.
asumazilla 4 years ago
He doesn't need to mount a Coup, he can declare a state of emergency and not hold an election if he feels there is a security threat.
asumazilla 4 years ago
The answers seem to be 1) Yes and 2) not yet.
asumazilla 4 years ago
FOX NEWS SHIT LIAR CHANNEL
88a 4 years ago
How about boycotting all main stream media in general? They all lie.
Ace7Pga 4 years ago
this is what I've been doing for past two years; I'm still alive and doing well......though I have no idea what "Lost" is about.
niunka1 4 years ago
I am a republican and I am 100% against george bush and against faux news.I am a republican but do not agree how repubs are voting/conducting themselves today.They have strayed far from their original conservative principals. Thats why I am backing Ron Paul
mainemilitia 4 years ago
Absolutely incredible
CognitiveDisonance 4 years ago
Why is Fox news considered by some people to be a credible news show? It just doesn't make any sense to me! As LiberalViewer points out in many of his videos, you just need to pay a little attention to find a great number of errors in the Fox news "reports"
Calmninja200 4 years ago
I'm getting really fucking pissed at Fox News...
Dreadwins 4 years ago
The big businesses are getting screwed as well, they shouldn't have to give up THEIR documents to anyone.
bigchew14 4 years ago
Yes Fox News lies, but I think a majority of politically minded people know that. Still, there is a good number of people whom I'm sure still believe them. I also think people have stopped caring about some of their constitutional rights. They think that they don't have anything to worry about because they aren't terrorists, but the truth is anyone who the government says is a terrorist IS a terrorist.
bigchew14 4 years ago
I'm completely in the dark on this one, LV. I never get e-mails or phone calls from international persons, but on the other hand, my girlfriend gets them all the time from former foreign-exchange students. So the gov't could tap her e-mail or cell-phone, and listen in to the convo's between her and I, or read the e-mails between her and I... So I could be unknowingly involved, just as she would be. Why does this crap keep getting passed through congress?
wemmitt87 4 years ago
Im 50 and ive never seen any president have this much unrestricted power to just about do anything he wants, say anything and conjur up false enemies. In any other country he would have been run out of office a long time ago. They even defied the UN about going to war against Iraq.
wanshei 4 years ago 3
The sad part is that so many of us are sssooo not caring or willing to just be sheeples. When a news company delivers a vlog on ONE woman who says "oh sure i'll take the chip implant (so the govt can monitor every time i fart or move)anything for my families security..." It sends the message 'argumentum ad poplum' and we go for it? Its not the news so much as the willing compliance of the citizens of this once great country.
wanshei 4 years ago
Where is your video about Dan Rather's bias and The NY times Liberal tendancies.CNN,CBS,NBC,PBS,VH1,MTV,Comedy Central, they all lean left. FOX is less Liberal but will never offset the bias in these other networks.
AUsluicerman 4 years ago
AUsluicerman,
If u can find evidence of ideological bias like Ive shown at Fox News coming from those other media outlets, feel free to make a video proving your point. For DOZENS of videos proving MY point that Fox News is consistently biased, see my Fox News Bias YouTube playlist at:
youtube(.)com/view_play_list?p=A3BD2524FE99BD4D
Thx 4 commenting :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago 2
hell ya faux news is fulla shit, ever really listen to michelle maulkin and O'Reilly? A nazi sympathizer and his little brown boot licker.
wanshei 4 years ago
video is not loading wtf
OtherOne81 4 years ago
OtherOne81.
Its loading now, though a little slowly
thx 4 letting me know there was a problem :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@LiberalViewer just forwarding something to you
"Can't anyone in your country sue Faux News for misleading viewers? Or take Congress and/or the administration to court, or challenge this revised law in supreme court? Are any qualified persons trying to do this, and if not, is it simply because they fear reprisals, or think they will not succeed? Wasn't your country founded by people who fought seemingly insurmountable odds?"
cake1834 9 months ago in playlist fox news bias
This has been flagged as spam show
@LiberalViewer just forwarding somethingf to you.
"Can't anyone in your country sue Faux News for misleading viewers? Or take Congress and/or the administration to court, or challenge this revised law in supreme court? Are any qualified persons trying to do this, and if not, is it simply because they fear reprisals, or think they will not succeed? Wasn't your country founded by people who fought seemingly insurmountable odds?
vancouver76 2 years ago"
cake1834 9 months ago in playlist fox news bias
liberalviewer, here are my questions:
One, have you ever confronted Fox with these charges?
and
Two, does Fox give a hoot?
Seriously, this is a major distinction. Especially if there was debate over the language being "terrorist" or merely "foreign." Do you think Fox is intentionally misleading the public to make the policy more acceptable?
voiyour 4 years ago
of course FOX is deliberately misleading. Isn't that blatantly obvious by now to anyone with half a brain?
FinnHawk 4 years ago 3
Fox News/Fox Storytime Is Killing America With Lies..And Iggnorant part time thinker still watch this shiite..Sad at Best, Treason at Truth
1787patriot 4 years ago
to answer your questions
yes they will/have
and yes they do but i think people today dont know what it is like to fend for them selves live with out a king... do what they want with the freedom they have insted.. they throw it away i think it is because we work all the day time, and we ahve forgoten what it is like to be wild
lostorfound19 4 years ago
Clasic neocon fox news and there idiot viewers
1capsule45 4 years ago
this reminds me of the complacency the jews had in nazi germany as Hitler started gaining power. I'm not being anti-semitic, it just seems familiar.
esdtenis 4 years ago
wow, that's a lot of power!!
hanzo2001 4 years ago
someone, please, give the dems a spine transplant.
guyvf 4 years ago
"They fawningly give praise and swear their indebtedness to what they percieve as truth being imparted to them" gave me the impresion that you felt that this guy is some indoctrinating force.
fedeman2 4 years ago
you talk like you're refering to this guy as Big Brother. an agendist? he's just presenting his point of view.
fedeman2 4 years ago
Thanks, BurtonxFan.
Dahlia Lithwick is my go-to journalist on Constitutional matters; I try not to miss her posts. She's at Slate.
Not all Republicans have abandoned strict constitutionalism - just the neocons. But corporate money is mostly flowing to the neocons, and the neocons have a lot of media sewed up, too. Traditionalists have been elbowed to the sidelines.
Urgelt 4 years ago
Urgelt,
Your comment about data mining and filtering is right on in my mind. I knew that collecting data creates power long ago. Any good investor of money knows that knowledge is power.See "Wall Street" the movie. The Nazis in Germany knew it. The gov't saves all data and mines it no doubt. I'm scared! For sure!!
prrolg 4 years ago
Very well put, prrolg.
Urgelt 4 years ago
Thanks for this LiberalViewer! I already knew that the Fox propaganda machine was just that, but it is really nice to see someone seperate some of them out and call them on it.
DemoRepub 4 years ago
I would like to agree with you, BurtonxFan. Historically, Republicans were indeed strict constitutionalists, for the most part. But neocons are not Goldwater Republicans.
Goldwater Republicans never favored suspension of habeas corpus, foreign adventures, Supreme Court interference with states conducting elections, warrantless interception of citizens' private communications.
Urgelt 4 years ago
Not to mention veritable a flood of signing statements which alter or suspend laws passed by the legislature, and a broad attempt to curtail Congress' constitutional oversight role, under the novel "Unitary Executive" theory. By no stretch of the imagination can any of this be considered strict constitutionalism.
George W. Bush himself said "the Constitution is just a piece of paper." Goldwater would have been amazed at what has happened to his party.
Urgelt 4 years ago
gmail reads all of your e-mails, they say that its just so that they can provide personalized ads in the sidebar, but they could definitely do some serious spying.
Zulu424 4 years ago
even i had forgotten about the most recent attack on our civil liberties, but i do remember hearing about it from--you guessed it--the colbert report. this video doesn't surprise me at all, especially Fox's use of the word "terrorist." i'm pretty sure there's some kind of rule for stories about wiretapping that they have to use "terrorist" somewhere in the story.
jackhornsby 4 years ago
I *think* it works this way: they collect everything that passes through one of their switch connection points and store it.
Once stored, they run a high-level filter to pick out things of interest, then mine deep. But they keep the raw data, because they may want to go back and look for something else.
If that's wrong, how would we ever know? There are no checks and balances. None.
Urgelt 4 years ago
Funny how LiberalViewer says Democraps were "bamboozled" into signing this crime into law. As if they're so dumb they don't know how to read a bill. Get it through your head dude, they want the power to be there when they take office too.
dmcbride1978 4 years ago
Just to clarify, I appreciate the work of LiberalViewer to bring this propagandizing bs to more peoples' attention. But if anyone thinks the Dems are innocent in all this, they are sorely mistaken.
dmcbride1978 4 years ago
I care deeply. This is an assault on the Constitution and on democracy.
I'd like to pose a third question, Allen. Does the Government's sweeping spy program really limit itself to collecting communications with persons in other countries?
I don't think so. I think they sweep up *everything* and then put it through data mining. Once they have the data, they can mine anything without court supervision under the new law.
Urgelt 4 years ago
I fair the former option much more than the latter. But sometimes...
hanzo2001 4 years ago
well put, I'll check the links too.
hanzo2001 4 years ago
isn't congress supposed to keep the presidents decisions in check? if the congress thinks he's transgressing the constitution, aren't they supposed to reject? sorry, I know very little of American law.
hanzo2001 4 years ago
Me neither
hanzo2001 4 years ago
as your name says, wake up america, patriotism and the idea of the patriot is long shadowed. Use common sense, it's healthier when your smart enough to know what's good for you. That's why it's important to go to college and do a major, any major.
Cool video by the way
hanzo2001 4 years ago
Your partially right but I think the distraction is propaganda and the illusion is actually a delusion. Fox news is the butt of transparent propaganda jokes throughout the world. If I must watch propaganda I'd rather watch one with a liberal bias because after all reality has a liberal bias. It is rather depressing that the press has turned on its citizens and caved to lobbying groups and corporations though....... and I'm talking to you too CNN!
CarrieSnider 4 years ago
Do you trust anyone other than Ron Paul to undo the crap we've gotten into?
heyerstandards 4 years ago
"Reasonably believed" is way too broad especially when the people who are saying what's "reasonable" are quite unreasonable.
PlayerXT 4 years ago
Nonsense.
delafere 4 years ago
By which I was refering to the idiotic comment below claiming the 4th amendment allows Bush to warrantlessly wiretap.
delafere 4 years ago
To paraphrase Christiane Amanpour, today's youth knows more about Paris Hilton than they do about the Constitution.
BeatBuddy 4 years ago
Wow that means I am now on notice that all my comments on youtube are being being printed out and some one is reading them and making data analysis of those words. I am happy to have others looking at my comments.
RoddyYoung 4 years ago
It's another way the man limits the people and censor our lives just a little more until we're all just a bunch of conservatives that believe our life always was as said so by god and that science is just a myth used by terrorists.
IUseUtoob4Pr0n 4 years ago
The idea of the american is that we are impervious. Few realize how much danger any one of us could be in at any one moment. This law expansion is giving more power over our free lives and under the wrong hands could lead americans into an age of fear of state. If they can track us without a warrent what's to stop them from apprehending a liberal such as yourself.
IUseUtoob4Pr0n 4 years ago
It's always okay to eavesdrop on foreigners, but when it's americans ass on the line, it's a whole different story... bunch of hypocrites...
Keep the videos coming, LiberalViewer, you're doing a great job.
GeorgePedrosa 4 years ago
Fourth Amendment: "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."
BeethovenWannabe 4 years ago 2
electronic communications and data storage adds a dimension of which the founding fathers could not have conceived.
prrolg 4 years ago
Watching Faux news is the adult equivalent to sticking your fingers in your ears yelling "lalala, I cant hear you" so as to deny something you just aren't mentally developed enough to cope with.
CarrieSnider 4 years ago
LIBERALS!
Watch this one:
/watch?v=-DqY8iIxe2c
rstrandmark 4 years ago
My girl and I are avid FOX viewers. Thanks for pointing out this small but interesting bias of our news in the US. But do you really think that this is such a huge pivot in power? I think yes and no.
Sid6p01nt7 4 years ago
yeah i hear you man i avoid fox news and another great video Liberal Viewer...thanks for the links to the laws i was trying to find to fully understand the new law in place
airsoftsniper4307 4 years ago
The spineless Democrats sold us out. They knew what
bush was doing, they weren't duped.
God help us...
bigge525 4 years ago
Fuck corprate Media! Thats the mantra.
2edgesword 4 years ago
Corporate Media sucks! "Fuck corporate Media", this is what you say when the media is working near you, so that they cannot spread live propaganda! Spying is wrong and they must be getting paranoid, so keep spreading the word.
2edgesword 4 years ago
i LOVE you LV. you said what i wrote in your pervious video:"People don't give a damn" about these stuff anymore. Unfortunately some politically-corrected morons attacked me, accusing me of being a liar and child molester! People of United States don't care about anything that happens to them anymore. i hope this government takes away huge chunk of their freedom and does everything in his power to destroy the very foundation of this society. Perhaps then people MAY wake the fuck up.
newsweekrocks 4 years ago
LV,
Good Video.
I tend to agree with FairMinded here though about Democratic compliance with passing this terrible bill. (NB. I'm a life-long Dem).
The important thing here is that this is only a six month bill. It can, and should be rewritten. Everyone write your congress-critters and demand this be fixed. Acceptance of this bill means the terrorists have won!
filiusardentis 4 years ago
fox news the new ministry of propaganda zig hail
tovasdad 4 years ago
Americans don't care because they're too worried about if the "Jones'" TV is bigger than their own.
sightunseen9 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
type in the search bar suburban slaughter horror movie...it is HYSTERICAL!! leave good comments and ratings thankyou.
xodancer4lifeexo 4 years ago
middled37-- Gee, thanks that help out a lot. Asshole.
putittogether 4 years ago 2
awesome
IsaacScharp 4 years ago
and you have the umitigated balls to assume this person, who has taken HIS time to expose lies purported by our so called journalists(THIS ELLICITS NO RESPONSE FROM YOU THOUGH?!), would 'be screaming' blame, & to whom?...please think...our country is depending on it.
MissAnthropic66 4 years ago 3
you sold out your countrymen for a hypathetical attack that may or may not have hurt or killed 1,000's of people..for one that definetly has killed 100,000's
WTF?
THOSE WHO WOULD COMPROMISE FREEDOM FOR SECURITY DESERVE NEITHER!bf
MissAnthropic66 4 years ago 4
listen here slar..im from NYC I had a meeting a few blocks away at10am 9/11-My father takes the train 2x a day my sister brother in law and husband commute, using the bridges and highways EVERYDAY..my friends and family live in the city.
I would take the risk of another attack over killing 100,000's of people.
you just dont make sense, save your hysterics for the simple minded & you wont find them here.
MissAnthropic66 4 years ago 5
Is it me, or was Brit Hume trying to sound like Tom Brokaw in that video clip of him talking about wire tapping and eavesdropping?
Geotubest 4 years ago
How was the Democratic congress "bamboozled"? Are they dumber than the average politically aware citizen who knew this was a bad deal?
I think the Dems WANT such power for when they are in office. Then, as always happens, the Dems will be spewing the glories and benefits of their special powers and suddenly Republicans will be the ones who care about the constitution and limits on power.
shyoung0801 4 years ago
Just making a comparison like that shows us all how little you understand this issue!
agreymonkeynamedasa 4 years ago
Real Topics:
Economy is failing.
Our monetary System is Failing.
Our Foreign policy is Failing.
Americans are not FREE.
We are losing our constitution.
Vote Ron Paul.
DevBlazed 4 years ago
poor fiber....where would we be without it.....i'd like to see how cranky they would be!
constipation is no joke!
and we have been blocked up in this country for decades!...LV..has provided us with fiber folks!~let's use it!
thanks FreePlay73...'preciate it.
MissAnthropic66 4 years ago
Dont you guys get it...The republicans and democrats are the same...All this is just cannon faughter....A little game they play to keep you entertained. Keep you off the real topics, the Democrat's would have gladly subverted the U.S. constitution just like them if given the chance to take more power over the people. In fact they supported Bush on these key issues. Sheep......
putittogether 4 years ago
I don't think fox news could ever make themselves seem legit ever again.
geekyvince 4 years ago 4
holy fuck. The last 8 years have been like reading Orwells unpublished prequel to '1984'.
inthefade 4 years ago 6
THE FEDERAL LAW IS ALREADY IN PLACE TO PUT THE RFID CHIP IN US in MAY 2008!
ANYONE THAT won't ALLOW IT TO HAPPEN WILL BE PUT IN PRISON CAMPS that ARE ALREADY IN PLACE WAITING FOR new ARRIVALS LIKE US. They WILL NEVER CHIP ME! I will DIE AND TAKE OUT AS MANY OF THEM AS I CAN WITH ME!
DOUGLAS BICKFORD
541-840-3699
AMERICAN INDIAN
BIBLE AND KORAN AND TORAH ARE LIES TO CONTROL US THROUGH FEAR OF HELL AND GODS WRATH!
RadicalforGreatSpirt 4 years ago
All the more power to you!
Geotubest 4 years ago
FAUX News has already succeeded (first question) because the American people have become compacent sheep (2nd question) accepting whatever they are told without argument. It is alarming how far we have fallen since the activism of the 60's and early 70's. The Me Generation is regrettably most consumed about themselves, or vicariously living through our celebrity culture.
dafttool 4 years ago
Oh kids, don't you know that the goverment has been listening and watching without warrarnts for a very long time. Warrants are just things they need when they take someone to court and do the legal dance. This ain't new. It's just public.
PETEYPOPOFF 4 years ago
It is still unconstitutional. I don't support elected officials that SAY it is okay to violate the constitution. I call unconstitutional government tyranny.
delafere 4 years ago 2
Fascism won, we lose. See you in the work camps. Oh if a government agent comes knocking on your door at 2:00am, to take you into custody and ship you to a "camp" with out a warrant, against your will, and in violation of the U.S. Constitution, exercise your constitutional right to put a bullet in their head.
putittogether 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Who cares? I could care less if the government listens to my calls to the Middle East, or even reads my email. You people are worrying about ghosts. If the Bush administration had evil intentions, they would not be asking Congress for permission.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
They're *not* asking Congress for "permission". They used to asked the GOP to rubberstamp everything they wanted, but now that the R's are no longer in charge of Congress, they fight to peel off about 10 Democrats, coupled with the Repub rubberstamp, and get their illegal programs passed. And don't get me started on just what rights you are SO willing to give up.
BI30 4 years ago 2
Tell me what rights do the dead have? People howl about the Patriot Act like it changed their lives in some way. I accept the risks of giving the government more flexibility in fighting terrorism. I will not accept the risks of being blown up on a plane or a bus at all. Since I am doing nothing wrong, I have nothing to fear.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
So, say the president's people want to spy on the opposition party... imagine they learn of valuable political strategy and use the knowledge to unfairly defeat the opposition. Does that scare you?
It's about OVERSIGHT. The old FISA laws allowed the executive branch to do ANYTHING they wanted and ask for a warrant up to 72 hours later. It's not a matter of giving the executive branch TOTAL power to do anything without oversight -OR- protect the country.
delafere 4 years ago 3
The Clinton's have done that. The Democrats have done that. Remember the infamous cell call that just happened to be recorded by a "elderly couple" ? I am not worried about the government taping my phone illegally, or looking at my library records. IF there are abuses, they will be dealt with. So far, I have not seen anything about abuses of these tools, only hypothetical problems.
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
the signs are obvious, the clues are many - and the fools that inhabit this world will still ignore them. sheeple are the weapon of monstrous governments, and you sir - are the perfect sheeple.
nosis106 4 years ago
I remember when Republicans DISTRUSTED the government and coveted it's privacy. But now, pardon my French, but I've never met a bigger bunch of whiny-babies as today's GOP: "Search my home! Listen in on my phone calls! Read my email! Whatever you have to do, just save me from the nasty terrorists!"
BI30 4 years ago
Watch 3,000 people die will do that to you!
4951WEDDEL 4 years ago
congrats my friend, you are the perfect tool of your oppressive government - you are exactly what they are working for. Do not doubt that these new laws will be used against the american people in the not so distant future, do not doubt that when the curtain falls on this fascist movement these laws will be used to find and eliminate those who oppose your "great" government.
nosis106 4 years ago 2
Watching 3,000 people die did NOT turn ME into a sheep, 4951WEDDEL. Why did it turn you into one?
delafere 4 years ago
Pity it takes so little for you to abandon 200 years of Constitutional principles.
BI30 4 years ago
Anyone who would sacrifice freedom for security desevrves niether. Benjamin Franklin
mixguru2u 4 years ago
I care. Forget the Islamo fascists. What about Amerikan fascists?
sheen7334 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is sooooo fake!
dedebiren 4 years ago
"If you don't have something to hide...why are you scared?" GOSH, I DON'T KNW...ASK THE PRESIDENT WHO USES EXECUTIVE PRIVLEDGE!
DaCoach68 4 years ago 3
I don't understand why some republican look at this as "why is it a big deal, unless you're a terrorist." ...but when the government tries to tighten gun laws they scream "the government is trying to take control of us!!! we need our guns in case they try to control us!!!" Don't they see, that that never happens radically? It happens bit by bit starting with things like this.
DblOSmith 4 years ago 3
FairMindedCitizen,
Did you read about the details of the negotiations? See, eg:
<b>tinyurl(.)com/yred9e
tinyurl(.)com/3dmlf4
tinyurl(.)com/2ny4e2
tinyurl(.)com/yuhhcy</b>
Now isn't <b>bamboozled</b> an accurate summary of those details?
Thx 4 comments :-)
LiberalViewer 4 years ago
I care.
Underwater7 4 years ago
1. Fox can tell its viewers anything. People who watch Fox are twits. They are scared of the terrorists and the communists and the extremists. So they will make a big controlling government that will conquer the world and get the bad guys. 2. People will not care until there is no panem et circenses.
ChristopherMarlowe 4 years ago 2
FairMindedCitizen And your point is??
JakiiRSM 4 years ago
No - just stop state-sponsored "trade" on behalf of corporations. We fight wars and force trade for corporate interests. Government needs to get OUT of business. Make corporate charitable contributions public and open. Allow the people to decide where they want to shop. Don't allow federal food labeling limiting the information we are provided on the food we eat in defense of efficiency. No more government sleeping with corporations. This is what Ron Paul believes.- peterson5523
natem20 4 years ago
the last question about whether USAmericans even care about the government eavesdropping on them is very appropriate but old hat. do the usamericans care about stolen presidential elections? no. do they care about being lied into wars? no. do they mind having a one party system? no. do they care who wins a baseball game? yes
joebonk 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Unless you're a terrorist planning on death and destruction somewhere in the US, then what is all of you guys problem? Do you think they give a hoot about your everyday normal life? What gets me is the terrorists who want to get us hates and wants to stop everything you guys want. They're ultra religious, they're against women's rights, they're against free speech, all of it that you get to do or voice here. And you're helping them.. unbelievable.
firejack007 4 years ago
my gawd are you not listening?? firejack007 This has nothing to do with terrorists, it's gaining control of us, removing our liberties. Wire taps on "suspected terrorists" has very broad language and can spill over on all of us. FISA clearly states a president has the right to wiretap a suspect if needed immediately. A warrant must be applied for within 72 hours after. So what is the big important issue for these guys to not get a warrant, except to not leave a paper trail.
JakiiRSM 4 years ago 4
I think it is funny how this is made out to be part of some kind of partisan agenda. We now have one party. The Republicrat party doesn't care about our civil liberties. They are fed agendas and talking points for the purpose of dividing this country's peoples. It has worked. People readily spew whatever the media feeds them without any tolerance for debate. It always turns into name calling and cheerleading your side.
judoskeleton 4 years ago 2
Not to say that it's totally to blame, but TV plays into that big time. So many programs are "all conflict, all the time", pitting one person or party against another (ex. good vs evil, right vs wrong, etc). Nuanced debate gets shafted in favor of, as Jon Stewart put it, "'Hardball' or 'Crossfire' or 'I'm Gonna Kick Your Ass'". It helps set the level of discourse at a place that encourages flamewars and stubborn posturing. In other words, reading is fundamental.
mistatibbs 4 years ago
too many big words
PianoMixMan 4 years ago
in other words, reading is fundamental.
agreymonkeynamedasa 4 years ago
The ACLU is always geting a bad rap. . . effffing bastards at fox!!!
the smart ones care!!!! the rest are the true sheep!!
citizenkong 4 years ago
The smart ones produce
SamuelCamel 4 years ago
produce is a good source of fiber!
citizenkong 4 years ago 4
and fiber in ones diet produces healthy stools!