Added: 3 years ago
From: lxx911xxl
Views: 497,948
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (2,483)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Fox banned it because Rush and Glenn said so. Sickening.

  • So down to earth and rational. Too bad Newt or Mitt will probably win regardless. Of course, that means Obama wins! And that is good. Too bad I can't vote in your next election. Eh.

  • CALLING ALL AMERICANS. You MUST, for the sake of our country and the rest of the world, spread the word of Ron Paul. If you want to make a REAL difference show at least 5 of your friends, that do not usually vote, this and other ron paul videos on youtube. Chances are they will not listen to campaigns on tv but they WILL listen to you!! Spread the word!!

    thumbs up so everyone can see.

  • WORDS, the massive destruction weapon against hipocrites

  • I wish other candidates could articulate like Ron Paul in saying an opinion. Especially like how he Promotes Himself instead of bashing his fellow candidates, which seems to be the trend these days...I personally am not a huge Ron Paul fan myself with that said, however.

  • I don't agree with Paul on a lot of things, but there are some issues on which this guy is brilliant. I wish others would adopt his anti-war policies. Good video.

  • Total win. I really feel sad for USA if they dont get Ron Paul as president. Its like watching all Europe fall into this EU hoax once again. Because if their would be a public election for EU in Europe tomorrow, 80% would vote for NO to joining EU. That is almost hilarious to see how much the americans actually knows how backstabbed the working class have been in Europe for been united inside of the damn EU.

  • This man is the only man for america ,wish we had a man like him in the uk

  • RON PAULLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL­LLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL­LLLLLLLL

  • FOX News only support stupid and racist people

  • I'm a democrat and I like his guy! Ron Paul for the win.

  • ron paul should be considered

  • As someone who leans to the left I see Ron Paul as the best chance to cleanse gov't of the terrible greed and underhand corruption that has pulled America down for decades. Even if you don't agree with all he says, I think people know he is genuine and incorruptible. He has no fear and will do the things he says or will die trying. He takes no pension and has no lobbyist. I think he is a genuinely good man who will pull gov't out of the way. Who else could you honestly trust? He is a good start.

  • It wasn't banned by Fox. Also, the title of this video has the word "Banned" rather than the proper term "Ban." LOL. Get an education.

  • @harvardjrnl hahaha , no i think it was banned by fox , and you sir need to go back to school lol banned is the past participant of the word ban , so how you going to past participate the word ban ? as baned ? this will only apply if you are using a noun as BANE :D , GO LEARN ENGLISH BEFORE MAKING A JACK ASS OUT OF YOUR SELF .

  • @anunnakigurl The headline is incorrect. By using the word "did" the word "Ban" should have been used. If the word "did" was removed then "Banned" would be correct. Well, at least educated people know this. BTW: In English Grammar there is no such thing as a "past participant." There is, however, past participle. So, go back to school and learn English before making a JACKASS out of yourself. Also, "JACKASS" is one word....DUMB ASS!!!. LMAO at stupid people like you.

  • @n8vbloodblackfeet GET UM!

  • RON PAUL

    Answering like a boss!

  • r3V0]ution RON PAUL 2012!

  • RON PAUL IS A FISCAL CONSERVATIVE

  • this wasnt banned it was live! infact i hear about this alot where he says i voted against more spending and waste in government* but he is voting against pork and needless spending that he put in the bills and he knows its going to pass so he votes against it. this guy isnt going to fix our economy if elected.

  • Haha Bruno..

  • Comment removed

  • I'd rather see ru Paul rather than Ron Paul in wh.

  • Okay, not only did Fox not ban the video, but the title says all. Don't pay attention to videos with grammatical errors.

  • @thedmundfitz is the internet... half the people throw grammar out the window lol

  • Can now understand why Fox network and other power brokers are afraid of Ron Paul, he's telling it like it is and some really can't afford to have the truth told.

  • my God I love this Man.

  • @powerstryker Me too He IS America !

  • as if anyone needs to reply as to why fox banned this? Isn't Dr. Ron Paul's answer evident enough?

  • I'm so impressed with Ron Paul's answers. Everytime he's asked a question, even questions specifically designed not to have an answer, Ron Paul still comes out with a financially saavy, level headed, good for all approach, trying to cover all the bases on everything.

    I just wish we had more politicians like Ron Paul so we could try getting our economy back in order, creating a workforce to supply jobs, getting Americans back to work so we all could start feeling better about ourselves again..

  • they probably banned it based on the fact that you're using their material.

  • @Funnypandalonies

    what if your a stupid fag commetning shit you dont even have a fucking idea about

  • @drgreen2209 wow, smart one dumb ass.

  • What's going on Paul is that the hook nose jews and their zionist masters in Israel wants America to control the middle east.

  • I LIKE FOX A LOT BUT THIS REPORT SHEET OUT TO MUCH.

  • his question to Ron .. is a Laugh ... Ron U rock ... I like you ... will you adopt me??? Thanks

  • Ron served those fools! Hes G and only one of thease lying scum who cares and tells the truth! :)

  • I switched side's so I could vote for Ron but I don't thank corporate america will ever let someone as good as hem become the president but god we need hem he's the 1st guy running president that's not full of shit in a very long time

  • Patriot

  • POWNED, Ron took him to school.

  • Ron Paul 2012!!!

  • Ron Paul frequently expresses his objections to the Iraq war. Ron Paul Speaks, a 2008 book documenting Ron Paul’s “dynamic statements on hundreds of issues,” states in several places, “He voted against the Iraq War.” (pp. xi, xiv, xvi, back cover) In October of 2002, Congressman Paul did vote against the Iraq War Resolution, H.J. Res. 114. However, Ron Paul’s Nay vote came one year late, after military action had already begun in the Mideast. On September 14, 2001

  • @miamivice2012 You are such a candy ass. You blocked me in messages because you can't beat me. If you can't beat me there, how in the WORLD do you ever expect to beat me here? You're a little girl. But I like how this post was flagged as spam lol. You are one sissy ignorant person lol. You don't stand a chance.

  • Ron Paul is a fucking joke.

  • I love how ron paul actually answers the question to the best of his abilities. No BSing, straight to the point. Every other candidate tip toes around the answer and usually ends up saying something about being christian or protecting the freedom and rights of americans.

  • anyone voting for anyone other than Ron Paul...

    if he loses...we all lose...

    you only have yourselves to blame!

    RON PAUL FOR THE WIN :)

  • RON PAUL FOR THE WIN :)

  • I love you Ron Paul!!! Thank you for fighting for what is right and being a voice for us!!!!

  • @TwinSmoke ya any poll that doesnt agree with.u is.skewed.lmao .. Thats what u.said about ginrich polls too.. And realclealpolitics is not a polling agency.they just collect polling data and make averages.. Lol

  • Comment removed

  • @kenny8331

    just gained 5 points nationally here we go:

    Mr. Paul and Mr. Gingrich pulled in 17 percent of the votes each, while former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney garnered 29 percent of the votes. The results of the Reuters/Ipsos poll were released prior to Mr. Paul’s 2nd place finish in the New Hampshire Primary. Whether Mr. Paul’s strong finish on Tuesday night will impact his standing in South Carolina or at the national level will be revealed in the coming

  • @miamivice2012 good job

  • @kenny8331

    Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX), a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, can celebrate two victories Wednesday. Mr.

     Paul is tied with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich for 2nd place at the national level among Republicans and Independents, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Tuesday.

  • Consistency - RON PAUL 2012

  • I hope they don't kill him, I like him.

  • Twin smoke, stop embarrassing yourself. Do you know how many american people have died from terrorist attacks since DNS was established (2002)? 14. And so what if we have too many troops? Doesn't mean we should ship them off to foreign countries we have no business being in. And our occupation just pisses foreigners off. Which, in the long run, just endangers us at home more when stupid media-fed junkies like you think it makes us "safe." After all, one of the reasons given for the 9/11 attacks

  • @PuffnOnPiff You are wrong. More Americans than that have died. But not one on US soil. All those attacks were in Yemen, Jordan, Saudi Arabia ect.. I would suggest you do your homework.

  • The moderators question was pure propaganda. Put that thought in peoples minds....... He got a good answer! The more I see of Ron Paul, the more I am convinced to vote for him. The rest are the same of what we already have and don't want.

  • I'm a liberal Independent & even I would vote for Ron Paul, if he got the Republican nomination. Otherwise, OBAMA 2012!

  • To anyone who is arguing with twinsmoke he is a complete fool and will not listen to anyone because he is closed minded and does not know the facts. Once you prove him wrong he will call you stupid start changing the subject because he can't defend his own opinions. everything he says is idiotic and he is to ignorant to realize how stupid he is

  • THIS MAN SCARES THIS FAKE GOVERNMENT.....

  • the only one i trust!

  • He's only electable if you believe in God and/or the U.S. Constitution. If that is the case, then he's the only one who hasn't sold his soul to wall st./the millitary-industrial complex.

    Who are the top ten contributors to each of the candidates, including Obama? Ask the same question of every single politician. Follow the money. He who pays the piper, calls the tune. That's what OWS is upset about. Too bad they want to fix bad, corrupt government with bigger bad corrupt government.

  • (Comment removed by American government)

  • open the mouth and speak the mind

  • This video should see more people

  • Ron Paul ftw!!!

  • It took me 4 years to realize. Ron Paul 2012

  • right, what notes

  • FUCK YOU MEDIA!

  • i hate politics, i feel this "American Idol" style of politics is a waste of our time. although i tend to agree with Ron Paul about most of his topics. but seriously what kind of a questions is this in the first place!? " do you think you have any viability in this"... seriously?

    its all a "big-dick swingers" contest, who looks the best, and who can answer these lame-brain questions that appeal to our stupid american masses. so, excellent job Ron Paul for trying to put it back on the right track

  • Republicans are war Mongers

  • Hes the man. if the world is smart, they will vote him in. smartest man in politics today.

  • Ron Paul is the MOST electable candidate of my lifetime.

  • hey twin *blow* smoke, just answer his questions. your straying from answering questions and stating facts to getting in the line for popularity politics. Look at unemployment, look at useless senseless wars with no end in sight. You sir are an idiot. I would love to see you blowing your *smoke* in a debate with Mr. Paul as he reduced your already pea sized brain to rubble. Moron.

  • Listen up jod34: Mr. Paul is easily the most sensible & honest candidate in the GOP & probably the entire US! Ron Paul is a bright man; he makes sense and speaks the unvarnished truth. How refreshing! No doubt you voted for war-happy GWB. The result's been 1000s of dead Americans and the worst economic turmoil since the Great Depression! Wake up people! Get your brain out of your ass and start using it! I dont get why so many are willfully blind to the most HONEST & VISIONARY leader in decades!!

  • I will vote for this guy. Only man among the crowd.

    Others are into self deception.

  • Ron Paul is an idiot. This was proven in the Iowa primaries. That was his best shot and he failed yet again. Paul and his isolationist, left wing policies will NEVER get the GoP nomination. His best hope is to be the head of the ACLU and stick to the house of representitives. The VAST majority of Americans agree with me. Watch what happens in New Hampshire, South Carolina and Florida. All you idiotic Paul supporters will know that I am right and that you are DEAD wrong.

  • @TwinSmoke Considering he's a true republic, and stands for everything America was founded upon, I find your comment ridiculous. To start out you call this man an idiot, proving you are ignorant of basic facts, he is far from being an idiot. All he's saying is let's just go back to our foundations, the things that made us great to begin with. The endless wars for special interests must stop. Did you know 80 percent of our military believe in Ron Paul's message?

  • @jod34 *republican

  • @TwinSmoke If we don't make a change in our policies, America will die, as all great nations do. Please don't fall for these other lying politicians. Their messages always change. Ron Paul has stood by his principles for over thirty years..

  • @jod34 Yeah, Paul has stood by his "principles". Gay marriage, abortion, prostitution, the legalization of every narcotic and anything else the states want to do. He wants to cut funding to our allies. Wants to abandon every friend we've ever had mainly Israel. He wants to LET Iran have nuclear weapons. He wants to WAIT for a terrorist attack and then attempt to put them on trial. Face it, Paul is more liberal than he is conservative. His best shot at being president would be to be Democrat.

  • @jod34 What "great nation" has died yet?

  • @TwinSmoke You're a fucken idiot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @verano1008 You're just another kindergardener. With your one line of idiocy, it's not real hard to see why you want to vote for Paul LOL. Paul is a loser. He'll never get the nomination and he can forget about ever being president. You obviously have no clue what so ever about politics. So why don't you stay quiet and let the adults talk. Thanks.

  • @TwinSmoke okay so you clearly are the Einstein of politics and the MOST sensible one in here. if i may, would you care to enlighten us the reason why Ron paul is not worthy of our vote? oh i Really looking forward to hear from you.and i suggest next time...try not to use the word "losers" unless that person is really truly are doing something stupid. Thanks

  • @TwinSmoke Explain yourself. Why can't Paul be elected? Is it because we have too much secret ballot counting (IOWA 2012)? We have a corrupt bias media sphere? Because good Americans are asleep from only being told the wrong side of multiple issues to just further stay quiet and accept the status quo of government? Do you even care about what you are saying? Have you no sense of what constitution is and how our elected government doesn't even up hold their own OATH of office to it?

  • @scikoolaid He WON'T be nominated for these reasons. He wants to allow the states to legalize every illegal narcotic, prostitution and gay marriage. He wants to end the fed but has no clue what to do once it's gone. He literally wants to tear down our wall that borders Mexico. He wants to end ID cards. Basically saying that it's ok for illegal immigrants to take our jobs. He wants to abandon every one of our allies. That also happened in WWII and look what happened.

  • @TwinSmoke Lets at least be accurate on those points. He wants to end the war on drugs, which any one who's looked at the subject would agree with (there's even several police groups who support ending it), legality of a drug has no baring on who uses them. He wants to first audit the fed, find out what do they do with money that they don't disclose and probably put in Jim Grant as the new chairman, and legalize competing currencies. He wants to put our military at the border -

  • @TwinSmoke what walls are you talking about? We have sporatic fencing, and some areas we actually watch for people to catch and stop them (not including the few individual border patrol groups who try to do the job the government doesn't), meanwhile there's miles of free crossing land. He is against a NATIONAL ID card, see: realID the very unpopular attempt of having a federal id card by using all the state's id systems and centralizing them.

  • @TwinSmoke Illegals don't take jobs, no one hires someone because they are just cheap, they hire someone who does the right amount of effort for the pay they get. I don't believe Paul has said anything of his own opinion about NATO other than quoting other past public figures opinions. He wants to talk to the rest of the world and be friends with everyone and openly trade with everyone (and why not?) You need to elaborate on what you are referring to with WW2.

  • @TwinSmoke I don't read minds. Aside from that, he makes sense I don't see how those opinions prevent nomination unless you mean the GOP is just not save-able.

  • @TwinSmoke We have walls that border Mexico? LOL! Where?! We put so much regulation on our border patrol that we aren't even allowed to shoot drug cartel members who try to cross the border, even if they attack!

    You have your candidates mixed up, your establishment hopeful Romney wants to ease the immigration rules, Ron Paul wants to use military troops to defend the borders.

    You sound educated, but really you're just incredibly stupid. I hope no one buys into anything you have ever said.

  • @oknowiamdead There IS a wall you idiot. Here's a link for you. It'll even show you a picture of it. ngm.nationalgeographic.c o m/2007/05/us-mexican-border/bo­wden-text

    So your obvious stupidity outranks ANYTHING you could say about politics LOL.

    And we DO shoot back at cartel members. Good God man. Just how far does your stupidity go? It's no wonder you want to vote for Paul. I haven't met anyone YET that's intelligent that wants to vote for that clown.

  • @TwinSmoke You call that segment of a piece of shit a wall? You say you watch every Republican debate, and one of the things they ALWAYS debate on is a wall and the costs of putting one up... good job dumbass. If I put a fucking plank in between mexico and US, you'd think it was a wall too.

    And yet it seems everyone is ignoring you now... LOL.

  • @oknowiamdead That wall goes for hundreds of miles. It is monitored with real time video feeds. It is more than obvious that you are completely ignorant about our border with Mexico just as you seem to be ignorant about everything. After all, you didn't even know we HAD a border wall. Might I suggest that you do a bit of research before coming here and looking completely stupid.

  • @TwinSmoke Hundreds of miles? Try 190 miles. Can you honestly call that a wall compared to an almost 2000 mile border reach. I fail to acknowledge that as a border wall. Obviously for you, this suffices as a wall. There's a difference between not knowing there was a wall and not acknowledging some scrap of an excuse for a wall as a "border wall".

  • @oknowiamdead Oh, excuse me. I missed it by 10 whole miles. I think we need to have a 50 foot tall concrete wall that spans then entire border. Don't forget also that we have predator drones scanning our border along with hundreds of real time video feeds. Paul wants to take all that down. That's why he won't win the nomination nor win a single state.

  • @TwinSmoke You sure you watch every debate? He says it all the time in them; he wants to reinforce those borders with military personnel rather than having them sent overseas on useless wars. Where do you get this from? "Hundreds" doesn't imply 200 miles, by the way, maybe "couple of hundred" does.

  • @oknowiamdead LOL! There's a diffference between a "couple of hundred" and "hundreds"? ROFL! Hundreds is plural meaning more than one and in this case it means 2. What you fail to realize is that we don't even have enough room for all our troops. That means that we'd have to build new billion dollar bases to house them. Something you'll never hear Paul talk about. By the way, we already have enough National Guard troops to patrol the borders. We don't need a million troops there.

  • @TwinSmoke Have you never even taken a high school rhetoric class or something? "Hundreds" implies vast numbers of hundred, appealing more to ethos (logic in your argument, which there isn't as I proved you wrong) than saying "couple (short term, not vast numbers) of hundreds". It is a matter of the mind, not official definition.

    There are foreclosed homes all over the country... government owned too. You think we won't use those or the land it resides in to house our troops? cont....

  • @oknowiamdead ROFL!!! Hundreds means more than ONE HUNDRED. Could be 2 hundred. Could be 9 hundred. Good God man.

  • @TwinSmoke Maybe instead of having the government forever expand our military-industrial complexes for the necessity of building a world empire, it's time to decrease that number and, if necessary, layaway some troops. You're right, for once, we have too many. Our technology is so advanced we could strike anywhere in the world from our homeland now! Is that force not deterrence enough? And to boost, we're maintaining control of foreign lands? Why does this make sense to you (serious question)?

  • @oknowiamdead Now that is the most ridiculous thing I've heard thus far. You want to decrease our military? That's just dumb.

  • @TwinSmoke Why does it make sense to expand them unless it's to send them across the world, not for national defense?

    And you clearly failed at understanding rhetoric in high school, or just now.

  • @oknowiamdead It makes sense to EXPAND the Patriot Act. If you've got nothing to hide, than who cares? I don't. But our troops spread all over the world IS for national defense. Defense of us and our allies. Do you want to be the one to tell South Korea that they have to go communist because we all know North Korea wants to attack them? The only reason they haven't is because we're there. Noone wants to mess with us. Paul came in distant second tonight. Double digits even.

  • @TwinSmoke I was talking about the military, now you're talking about the Patriot Act... I'll go along.

    It's not about hiding anything, it's about the abuse of such power. That power to tap into other people's civil liberties could lead to the filtering of the DESIRED citizen. Who knows what that might be defined as later? The laws are so scrutinized now, including the recently NDAA act that was just signed that basically anyone the government doesn't like can be labeled as a terrorist.

  • @oknowiamdead Your last post was incoherant. I stated what I THOUGHT you meant.

    If you believe in civil liberties so much, than join the ACLU. And the new NDAA act does NOT say that anyone the government doesn't like can be assissinated since that's what you're talking about. There are protocols and procedures for everything. It makes me happy to see our country protected. But just like Paul, you don't want us to be protected at all. You want us to get hit and then try the terrorists.

  • @TwinSmoke What protocols are you talking about that is specified in the NDAA that you read? Because the one I read clearly states no protocol, only the power to detain anyone, INCLUDING US citizens "who has committed a belligerent act"... do they go on to explain what a belligerent act is? No, they don't. It's a completely vague law with opinion being the power behind the justification of it

    lawfareblog . com /wp-content /uploads /2011 /12 /NDAA-Conference-Report-Detain­ee-Section . pdf

  • @TwinSmoke The new NDAA act is your Patriot Act on steroids. So I hope you're happy with entrusting a small number of elected officials with the power to detain anyone they feel is justified under "belligerent act" against the US. That could well be anyone, and only left to opinion, as I had stated before. But this'll be the last thing I write before tomorrow or something.

  • @oknowiamdead I think you need to read a little closer. hlswatch.c o m/2011/12/15/national-defense-­authorization-fy2012-an-obscur­e-and-likely-danger/

    This bill states that it is directed at ONLY those responsible for 09/11 or those who have harbored those responsible for 09/11.

  • @oknowiamdead

    TL;DR

    Their law means nothing except to those they have power over or work for them willingly.

    I.E. assasins, spies, police officers, citizens who are mentally retarded. etc.

  • @kawaiifreak860 That's where psychological warfare comes in. It's everywhere in America; the news, advertisement, politics... you name it, they have an opinion they want you to have as well.

  • @oknowiamdead We've already had this debate. You know nothing of the NDAA. That is ONLY for the people responsible for 09/11 or those that harbor those responsible. For real man, try reading something sometime.

  • @TwinSmoke

    really take your own advice... start with reading the constitution perhaps..

  • @TwinSmoke Of course, if you believe in acting a certain way not because you feel it is right but because the government tell you its right, then you would willingly give them this power. I, however, believe in liberty. Liberty is not told what you should be doing, and giving up your liberties for a way of life is the easiest way tyrannical governments come to power. It's happened many times in history, and it all depends on the leader. It might happen anytime (I think its happening now).

  • @oknowiamdead Then like I said previously. Join the ACLU. they'll agree with you 100%.

  • @TwinSmoke As far as your argument that spreading troops all around the world is for national defense... why isn't any other country doing practically the same thing? We don't see British bases or Chinese bases or even Iranian bases in the US, much less anywhere else in the world except their own countries... Sweden is practically untouched with its incredibly low crime rates, but they seem to not be getting attacked? Why do you think that is? I think its because they mind their own business.

  • @oknowiamdead Because there's not another country on Earth like us. That should be obvious. But if you think that countries don't get attacked for minding their own buisness, then please explain to me why the Phillipines was recently attacked? You are dead wrong. Even in the quran it states that Christians and Jews are to be persecuted. It states in the quran that they should die and that islam will take over the world. If you'd like, I can link you the direct quotes.

  • @TwinSmoke 1. You're twisting the Qu'ran's words to your own propaganda. When it is translated from Arabic to English, it is lost in translation many times when quoted like you are right now. Unless you can read Arabic, and have actually read the Qu'ran (like I have), please don't make any assumptions based on what you saw someone else interpreting the Qu'ran as

    2. Phillipines have always had trouble with domestic terrorism even before 1899. You might want to do more research on that.

  • @TwinSmoke Ask yourself this; There were more than 6 million Islamic people in the US before 9/11... if the Qu'ran really did say what you said, why haven't we seen attacks from them on our Jews and Christians but from Islamic in a foreign land instead?

  • @oknowiamdead "Slay them wherever you find them...Idolatry is worse than carnage...Fight against them until idolatry is no more and God's religion reigns supreme." (Surah 2:190-)

    "The only true faith in God's sight is Islam." (Surah 3:19)

    "Seek out your enemies relentlessly." (Surah 4:103-)

    "Believers, take neither Jews nor Christians for your friends." (Surah 5:51)

    "Make war on them until idolatry shall cease and God's religion shall reign supreme." (Surah 8:36-)

  • @TwinSmoke Those Qu'ran quotes are taken completely out of context, how about you actually read the whole verse?

    I'll put one up so you can look up the rest of them.

    "O believers, do not take the Jews and the Christians as your friends and protectors, they are friends of each other. And whoever makes them a friend then he is from amongst them. Verily God does not guide the unjust people. And you will see that those (Muslims) in whose hearts is a disease run towards them saying... cont...

  • @TwinSmoke ...cont...'We fear that a calamity may befall us.' So God will soon bring victory or a decision from Him, causing them regret on account of the thoughts they harbored in their hearts." (Quran 5:51-52)

    Moral of the story? Do the research yourself, don't take what other's opinion of chopped up verses as the truth.

    If I told you Christianity had these same hateful quotes against others, you probably would say "NEVER WOULD CHRISTIANITY DO THAT!"....well...cont...

  • Comment removed

  • @TwinSmoke

    Ron Paul surges five points in national poll

    Congressman Ron Paul a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, can celebrate two victories Wednesday. Mr. Paul is tied with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich for 2nd place at the national level among Republicans and Independents, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Tuesday Mr. Paul and Mr. Gingrich pulled in 17 percent of the votes each while former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney garnered 29 percent

  • @miamivice2012 Another copy and paste. Wow. Good job. First of all, Paul ranks 4th in national polls. We've already had this polling debate. I was right and you were wrong as usual. But keep picking and choosing what polls to follow. In the end, I'll STILL be right.

  • @TwinSmoke

    Thats the latest poll ... Well who nailed you on Ginrich lmao kept saying Ginrich wasn't dropping.. On Iowa Paul ended up being 3 percent behind Romney give me a break.. Polls showed Paul 2nd place in New Hamp and were they wrong?

  • @miamivice2012 Paul was 4% behind both Romney and Santorum.

  • @TwinSmoke

    Wow im off by 1 percent lmao bro you really are deluding yourself if you think Romney had a clear win over paul in Iowa.. in New Hampshire yes.. but not Iowa

  • @miamivice2012 Just another example about how you're wrong about everything. Paul ranks FOURTH in national polls. Just face it, he doesn't stand a chance.

  • @TwinSmoke

    Mr. Paul and Mr. Gingrich pulled in 17 percent of the votes each, while former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney garnered 29 percent of the votes. The results of the Reuters/Ipsos poll were released prior to Mr. Paul’s 2nd place finish in the New Hampshire Primary. Whether Mr. Paul’s strong finish on Tuesday night will impact his standing in South Carolina or at the national level will be revealed in the coming

  • @TwinSmoke

    here we go again.. its not a poll from monday or last week.. lol

    Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX), a candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, can celebrate two victories Wednesday. Mr. Paul is tied with former House Speaker Newt Gingrich for 2nd place at the national level among Republicans and Independents, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released Tuesday.

  • @miamivice2012 All of MY polls were correct. All of your polls turned out to be crap. Are we really going to continue this? You even ADMITTED that I was right so just stop. I already know you'll search for and pick ANY poll if it suits you. After the next election in South Carolina, I'll just be making you look ridiculous yet again thanks to your ridiculous polls. LOL

  • @TwinSmoke

    really? remember this?lol

    Re: good article on Iran Part of debate The poll I saw showed Paul barely in second place in Iowa. Just above Romney. Gingrich is still solidly in first. In fact, here are the numbers. NATIONAL: Gingrich 32.4 Romney 22.6 Paul 9.6 IOWA: Gingrich 23.0 Paul 18.7 Romney 17.0 NEW HAMPSHIRE: Romney 33.3 Gingrich 22.0 Paul 15.7

  • @TwinSmoke

    Remeber this? lmao

    Texas congressman Ron Paul was the biggest gainer in our Inside Facebook 2012 Election Tracker after the Republican presidential debate Thursday night — the last debate before the Iowa caucus on Jan. 3rd. Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney also saw a surge after the debate, passing Newt Gingrich

    and your response was that it was bull lol .. because your realclearpolitics averages are always correct LMAO

  • @miamivice2012 I'll take Realclearpolitics, Rasmussen and Gallup any day over your skewed polls.

  • @TwinSmoke You're babbling about polls now, and not politics? Guess your asshole still hurts from the last debate we had. Just quit already dude, you have no credibility whatsoever.

  • @oknowiamdead LOL, thanks for the comic relief. Polls have EVERYTHING to do with politics. But I wouldn't expect a simple minded person like yourself to ever understand the simplicity in that. But you are sadly mistaken. You've never beaten me in a debate and you never will. I already buried you once. Keep it up and I'll do it all over again for all to see. :-)

  • @TwinSmoke See that top comment? That's proof enough of the ignorance of your defeat. Saying polls have everything to do with politics is like saying expert analysis of the stock market has everything to do with Wall Street, and if that comparison was too complicated for you...

    it's like saying running has everything to do with soccer...

    or (in the most dumb-down version I could give you) a fast car is all that has to do with NASCAR...

    or school has everything to do with being successful...

  • @TwinSmoke I wouldn't expect you to understand politics. You treat it like a football game score...

    "Mitt Romney is ahead, he must be the best!" trolololol.

    You correlate success and authenticity of a candidate based on his polls, and not on his track record, or his sincerity, or even his stance... LOL. You're such a joke.

  • @oknowiamdead When have you ever seen me advocate Romney? Name just one time. The only thing I said is that Romney is burying Paul which is factual. But then again, so are Santorum and Gingrich. Paul is not even going to attend tomorrows debate in South Carolina. He must know he's already lost.

  • @TwinSmoke

    your probably masturbating at the thought that paul won't attend.. hilarious lol good thing his surging now.... lets see how it plays out.. remember he was in last place according to you a few days ago ..lol

  • @miamivice2012 I didn't say he was in last. I said "he is near dead last". I really love your propaganda lmao!

  • @TwinSmoke '

    No i really love your propaganda lmao..