Topics: Terrorism, War, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, The Secrets Of Human Essence And Happiness, THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, About the END OF THE WORLD, Debated issues, and many others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com, etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc3.yolasite.com, etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com, announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com, etc.
HOW ABOUT TV SHOW HOSTS PUT BLACK RACISTS ON THE SPOT FOR ONCE, I'M SICK OF THIS BULLSHIT! THEY HAVE HIM SITTING THERE APOLOGIZING LIKE A LITTLE BITCH OVER A FUCKING EMAIL! A BLACK MAN COULD SCREAM THE SAME BIGOTRY OFF THE ROOFTOP OF THE GROUND ZERO MOSQUE AND NOBODY WOULD SAY A GODDAMN THING! FUCK YOU PEOPLE
Blacks do more to uphold their own racial subordination than anyone else. They'll talk day & night but them look at actions. That's why I don't listen to blacks. They're all the same.
@2bbgunzup They're ALL the same? I'm sorry, have you MET every Black person who is currently in existence? And I'm sorry, but please don't use the excuse of , "Well, all of the black people I'VE MET act like this..." because no matter how many Black people you've met, it's not even once percent of the grand total. So no, not ALL Blacks are the same, and don't let your opinions and experiences fool you into having such a blatantly ignorant thought.
" Here's a little inside scoop about white people: We're not thinking about you. Especially WASPs. We think EVERYBODY is inferior, and we are perfectly charming about it." --Ann Coulter
Would seem to be inclusive meaning all people. ymmv
The argument of there being "too much sensitivity" would be much more convincing if it was presented by the same people whose background and most recent historical identity are not so tightly associated with racial supremacy (white nationalists, believers of myth of Anglo Saxons, Aryan supremacist, etc.).
" Here's a little inside scoop about white people: We're not thinking about you. Especially WASPs. We think everybody is inferior, and we are perfectly charming about it." --Ann Coulter
Has anyone ever thought that maybe blacks do cause more crime than whites. Is that racial profiling or a fact? What if it's true. Wouldn't you be more suspicious of blacks? I know after 9/11 I am more suspicious of men with long beards from the middle east. It's not racism, its just common sense people. I think the issue is attitude of a community. When blacks act all tough and gangsta like, then you are very warry of them. If they act respectful you are not. Same is true for whites.
Can I add that poverty is what causes more crime. It Has nothing to do with race. Blacks who live in affluent areas do not have a high crime rate among them. I use this scenario all the time with people. "If a white man living in surburbia, who has never been in trouble and lives a good life can go home and murder his whole family because of the idea of being poor why are we so surprised that there is a high crime rate in urban neighborhoods where people are living in poverty everday?
Coulter can afford to go on national t.v. saying the shit she does, causing democrats trouble. Blame single mothers & defend deadbeat dads. This Is why I hate rich people.
Now you are being silly. The cop shouldt have investigated the call. That's a given. However, once the professor showed two forms of ID he should have gave the man his ID said sorry for your troupble and left immediately. To further question him after he proved who he was would have pissed anyone off. Then to lock up a 58 year old crippled professor who was in his own home and who wasn't a threat to anyone was ridiculous. Regardless of what race he is. I mean really he has a cane.
no. the cop should had seen that he was black and ran away knowning that he would get in trouble for messing with a black man. and what the fuck does being crippled have to do with anything you dumbfuck? he was there to protect his home and the professor over reacted!!
EXACTLY HE OVER REACTED. THAT WAS IT!! In this country you get arrested for committing a crime and overreacting in your own home is not a crime. This man was no threat to anyone. Not the officers, his neighbors, no one. So why arrest him. The police officer got his feelings hurt because the professor cursed him out. I mean really. Put your big boy underwear on. In my old neighborhood the cops I know would have told Gates to shut his old ass up and went on their way.
Again, what is an overreaction. What may be a overreaction tothe cop might not be to the professor. An overraction in your home is not a crime. This isn't about race this is about an abuse of power. How about once he had the professors 2 forms of ID he should have went on his merry way. END OF STORY!
When was it a crime to over react. When did people start getting locked for that in their own home. I mean really! If this police officer doesn't have thick enough skin to ward off a 58 year old crippled professor then what is he doing being a cop. In my old neighborhood the cop would have told him to shut his old ass up and then he would have went on about his merry way. Once he knw it was the man's house he should have gotten out of the man's house. END OF STORY!
One of my degrees is in law enforcement and it is documented proof due to homogeneous hiring practices of the American police department nationwide of primarily white males. Disproportionate hiring practices of such a sensitive and important area is a constant detriment to the effectiveness of crime prevention.
Do you honestly believe that a cop who thinks that blacks are banana eating jungle monkeys, will in turn accord them the same rights as humen beings. Do you think he alone holds this view. Show me his inner circle, because that is where his opion was formed.
I find it truely funny that the black community puts political pressure to enact these Racial Profiling laws. Then they fall back on the fact that there is a law to prove that there must be profiling. Show me that statistical data on the prosecution of the violations of these Racial Profiling laws.
In Kansas the one and only case to go to court for a violation of the profiling law was shot down. Each time you break a case down to the facts the profiling issue dissappears.
regardless of all the So called "intelectual" conversations and Ups and downs about who has what point and whats been documented as fact.Blah Blah Blah,.theres is but one Obvious truth... this lady is a racist too... nobodys saying profiling is an epidemic, she used the word herself, but atleast she answered the question somewhat "its not that its never happened" DUH! come on what she really wants to say is yeah it happens but get over it so what if your black you might need to be checked...
I've only ever heard her admit to racial profiling when it's an African American profiling against a white man. And every one of those is so weak that you can't even take it seriously. I personally am just so on the other side of the spectrum it's hard for me to believe or agree with anything she, or conservatives, say. We're just so different, no wonder this country is in disarray.
Perhaps you don't understand her because she approaches the subject of racial profiling from an intellectual position instead of an emotional one.
I think she explains herself perfectly when she starts this entire interview by saying, "It's not that it's NEVER happened, but..." and goes on to explain her reason for citing the cases she does.
Now, if you aren't used to reading and keeping up on the news, it may be a surprise to you that racial profiling is EXTREMELY overplayed by the media...
[pt 2] And because of the overwhelming OVERreporting of the idea of racial profiling, a little balance is needed. That is, if you care about perspective.
See, in a civilized society like America, a court system is set up to iron out disputes with each other or the law. We don't just grab a machette and start hacking up the rival tribe.
Ann is an astute, trained lawyer, and she speaks in a language that, when all the emotional crying and bitching is over, really matters in a country like ours.
You misunderstood, I'm neither bitching nor crying and I have no emotional ties to this issue. I'm merely saying I don't agree with everything this woman, and other conservatives alike, think and believe. I'm not arguing that she isn't astute or well educated, I just down right don't agree with what she's saying. That's it. I'm sorry you have a problem with people who disagree with you. And you shouldn't talk so condescendingly it makes you come off as an asshole.
Well, as long as your argument comes without legal substance, and Ann's comes from documented court cases, you'll lose every time.
And as far as your problem with being condescended to, I really don't care. Whatever it takes to make irrational reactions such as yours go away, I'm all for. We Conservatives have been trying to help you understand through reasoned dialogue for a LONG time, now, and it seems that with voices such as yours, the problem of ignorance/violence only gets worse.
Just because you put yourself on the other side of the spectrum doesn't mean you are right.
In a developed nation like ours, one has to make their claim of racial bias in an intelligent, demonstrable way before acknowledgement and remedy is applied.
These things, once again, are hammered out in a court. If you want to start letting every African American take the law into their hands and start taking revenge on cops, then you have to let all of the European Americans take revenge on THEM.
Well, let me tell you: by the way you react and switch topics, I can tell that you have a lot of built-up ignorant prejudices about Conservatives. I wish you could read up a little about Conservative thought instead of acting like we're your enemy.
But to answer your question: I think that if you are a taxpayer in this great country, then you should be able to acquire a legally-sanctioned decree of civil union that states you have the same rights of hospital visits of a dying spouse, etc.
But that our society standards should prevent civil unions for mothers and sons, fathers and daughters, brothers and sisters, etc. In other words, I believe in a "civil union" for homosexuals, but not for incestuous relationships of adults and children.
I do not think that any church should be forced to bless a union they don't believe is in their religious doctrine to do so. After all, if a church can legally deny to marry 2 heteros for a reason, they shouldn't be forced 2 for gays.
gay marriage is a misnomer in concept. marriage was conceived as a religious institution as a covenant between a man a woman and god for the mutual society,support and protection of a man to a woman and vice versa and for the procreation of children
That is true based on the Bible. Which is used where? Drum roll please! In Church. So the Church should stay out of Government and the government should stay out of the Church.
Excuse me but I think you should do a little bit more research on that issue. Our founding fathers were not devout christians. Hell the reason why America even exist is because the pioneers that came here was not at all happy with government being so controlled by the Church of England. I think I am really fair. The Government shouldn't tell the Church who they should have marry in their institution and the Church should worry about how the Government defines marriage. That's only fair.
Ann coulter Is just a trouble maker. She defends these deadbeat dads, who leave their kids, For some bimbo blonds, with fake boobs. She blames the single mothers for their problem.
It's not single mothers who are dragging down America. It's the father's who are running from their responsibilities when it comes to taking care of their kids. If Fathers took care of their kids the way they should we wouldn't have so many issues. The fathers need to step up and do their damn jobs. We have states taking care of kids when it should be the father. Ann knows this but of course she is not going to put it like that because that wouldn't sell books now would it.
I hope you die by spontaneous combustion for your stupidity.
You expect Ann to kiss Obama's ass and if she doesnt she's a racist. If you had your way, the only people that can have an opinion are Blacks and Democrats and republicans would be arrested by the thought police. Get a life.
She Is a rich blond bimbo. Who does nothing but causes trouble. She really hates It her party lost In 2008. Well republicans need to keep their fucking damn, comments to themselves.
See where all of these is leading? Who wants to go back to a Third World existence where we solve every dispute with machettes?
I mean, this society is pretty good to it's minorities--just ask all of the millionaire blacks, Latinos, Asians, and Arab folks who have made it here.
When the knee-jerk blacks who try to hype up the notion of "racial profiling" (and not all blacks do, of course), go unanswered, society loses. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan lead the lot, sadly.
A-Anti
C-Christ
L-Lobbing
U-Union
wwhit2001 3 months ago
@AChamblee831
Lol, she can kiss mine too. Rev. Sharpton has way more sense than she does by the way.
DivinelyMochaDipped 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW BOOK TO READ FOR YOUR ENJOYMENT
Topics: Terrorism, War, Politics, Religion, Philosophy, Science, The Secrets Of Human Essence And Happiness, THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, About the END OF THE WORLD, Debated issues, and many others.
Websites: balanceddiet1.yolasite.com, etc.
See Figure 4, which is THE MEANING OF THE PYRAMID, at figure4etc3.yolasite.com, etc.
See Announcements at announcements-balancedway.weebly.com, announcements-balancedway.yolasite.com, etc.
TheServiceWeb 7 months ago
LMMFAO!!!...White people..
TheBlacsheep 11 months ago
HOW ABOUT TV SHOW HOSTS PUT BLACK RACISTS ON THE SPOT FOR ONCE, I'M SICK OF THIS BULLSHIT! THEY HAVE HIM SITTING THERE APOLOGIZING LIKE A LITTLE BITCH OVER A FUCKING EMAIL! A BLACK MAN COULD SCREAM THE SAME BIGOTRY OFF THE ROOFTOP OF THE GROUND ZERO MOSQUE AND NOBODY WOULD SAY A GODDAMN THING! FUCK YOU PEOPLE
ManofManyPasswords 1 year ago
Blacks do more to uphold their own racial subordination than anyone else. They'll talk day & night but them look at actions. That's why I don't listen to blacks. They're all the same.
2bbgunzup 1 year ago
@2bbgunzup They're ALL the same? I'm sorry, have you MET every Black person who is currently in existence? And I'm sorry, but please don't use the excuse of , "Well, all of the black people I'VE MET act like this..." because no matter how many Black people you've met, it's not even once percent of the grand total. So no, not ALL Blacks are the same, and don't let your opinions and experiences fool you into having such a blatantly ignorant thought.
lorijaye 11 months ago
love ann
fcabido 1 year ago
Ann Coulter is another bitch fool of shit and probably racist too.............
Piky501 1 year ago
Ann Coulter used to be a man. Women do not have Adams apples. It is freakin' HUGE....LOL LOL LOL
kathrynk007 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
" Here's a little inside scoop about white people: We're not thinking about you. Especially WASPs. We think EVERYBODY is inferior, and we are perfectly charming about it." --Ann Coulter
Would seem to be inclusive meaning all people. ymmv
Tejas454 1 year ago
The other one is just as stupid as ann look her up
marcelameixner 1 year ago
The argument of there being "too much sensitivity" would be much more convincing if it was presented by the same people whose background and most recent historical identity are not so tightly associated with racial supremacy (white nationalists, believers of myth of Anglo Saxons, Aryan supremacist, etc.).
" Here's a little inside scoop about white people: We're not thinking about you. Especially WASPs. We think everybody is inferior, and we are perfectly charming about it." --Ann Coulter
nimapf 2 years ago
Comment removed
nimapf 2 years ago
Comment removed
nimapf 2 years ago
I'm insulted that they didn't mention hispanics! We clearly speed more than blacks!!
Paulwhoisvegan 2 years ago
STUPID FUCKING CUNT DIE!!!!!!!
dman123abc 2 years ago
Why doesn't the other woman argue against her like she did with others?
Paulwhoisvegan 2 years ago
Has anyone ever thought that maybe blacks do cause more crime than whites. Is that racial profiling or a fact? What if it's true. Wouldn't you be more suspicious of blacks? I know after 9/11 I am more suspicious of men with long beards from the middle east. It's not racism, its just common sense people. I think the issue is attitude of a community. When blacks act all tough and gangsta like, then you are very warry of them. If they act respectful you are not. Same is true for whites.
2Tellthetruth 2 years ago
Can I add that poverty is what causes more crime. It Has nothing to do with race. Blacks who live in affluent areas do not have a high crime rate among them. I use this scenario all the time with people. "If a white man living in surburbia, who has never been in trouble and lives a good life can go home and murder his whole family because of the idea of being poor why are we so surprised that there is a high crime rate in urban neighborhoods where people are living in poverty everday?
mrscorie 2 years ago
Coulter can afford to go on national t.v. saying the shit she does, causing democrats trouble. Blame single mothers & defend deadbeat dads. This Is why I hate rich people.
obamaownsrepublicans 2 years ago
I think Ann needs to look up the definition of racial profilling. Then she can try to make her argument.
mrscorie 2 years ago
okay, tell you what, no cop will investigate a possible breaki at a black mans house
CamelsAssBangMohmed 2 years ago
Now you are being silly. The cop shouldt have investigated the call. That's a given. However, once the professor showed two forms of ID he should have gave the man his ID said sorry for your troupble and left immediately. To further question him after he proved who he was would have pissed anyone off. Then to lock up a 58 year old crippled professor who was in his own home and who wasn't a threat to anyone was ridiculous. Regardless of what race he is. I mean really he has a cane.
mrscorie 2 years ago
no. the cop should had seen that he was black and ran away knowning that he would get in trouble for messing with a black man. and what the fuck does being crippled have to do with anything you dumbfuck? he was there to protect his home and the professor over reacted!!
vincecarter14 2 years ago
EXACTLY HE OVER REACTED. THAT WAS IT!! In this country you get arrested for committing a crime and overreacting in your own home is not a crime. This man was no threat to anyone. Not the officers, his neighbors, no one. So why arrest him. The police officer got his feelings hurt because the professor cursed him out. I mean really. Put your big boy underwear on. In my old neighborhood the cops I know would have told Gates to shut his old ass up and went on their way.
mrscorie 2 years ago
Black people only hate crowley. They will whine about this the rest of their life.
obamaownsrepublicans 2 years ago
The professor overreacted. He caused himself to be arrested. END OF STORY. But the blacks will whine about this forever.
obamaownsrepublicans 2 years ago 6
Again, what is an overreaction. What may be a overreaction tothe cop might not be to the professor. An overraction in your home is not a crime. This isn't about race this is about an abuse of power. How about once he had the professors 2 forms of ID he should have went on his merry way. END OF STORY!
mrscorie 2 years ago
When was it a crime to over react. When did people start getting locked for that in their own home. I mean really! If this police officer doesn't have thick enough skin to ward off a 58 year old crippled professor then what is he doing being a cop. In my old neighborhood the cop would have told him to shut his old ass up and then he would have went on about his merry way. Once he knw it was the man's house he should have gotten out of the man's house. END OF STORY!
mrscorie 2 years ago
One of my degrees is in law enforcement and it is documented proof due to homogeneous hiring practices of the American police department nationwide of primarily white males. Disproportionate hiring practices of such a sensitive and important area is a constant detriment to the effectiveness of crime prevention.
imnazhole 2 years ago
opinion
MachineGunGhost 2 years ago
Do you honestly believe that a cop who thinks that blacks are banana eating jungle monkeys, will in turn accord them the same rights as humen beings. Do you think he alone holds this view. Show me his inner circle, because that is where his opion was formed.
MachineGunGhost 2 years ago
I find it truely funny that the black community puts political pressure to enact these Racial Profiling laws. Then they fall back on the fact that there is a law to prove that there must be profiling. Show me that statistical data on the prosecution of the violations of these Racial Profiling laws.
In Kansas the one and only case to go to court for a violation of the profiling law was shot down. Each time you break a case down to the facts the profiling issue dissappears.
stowers157 2 years ago
the truth is so hard to hear for some!
martywhitevan 2 years ago
regardless of all the So called "intelectual" conversations and Ups and downs about who has what point and whats been documented as fact.Blah Blah Blah,.theres is but one Obvious truth... this lady is a racist too... nobodys saying profiling is an epidemic, she used the word herself, but atleast she answered the question somewhat "its not that its never happened" DUH! come on what she really wants to say is yeah it happens but get over it so what if your black you might need to be checked...
vizeck 2 years ago
What about Jena Six?
churchfanatic 2 years ago
I've only ever heard her admit to racial profiling when it's an African American profiling against a white man. And every one of those is so weak that you can't even take it seriously. I personally am just so on the other side of the spectrum it's hard for me to believe or agree with anything she, or conservatives, say. We're just so different, no wonder this country is in disarray.
SpuffiedGirlie90 2 years ago
Perhaps you don't understand her because she approaches the subject of racial profiling from an intellectual position instead of an emotional one.
I think she explains herself perfectly when she starts this entire interview by saying, "It's not that it's NEVER happened, but..." and goes on to explain her reason for citing the cases she does.
Now, if you aren't used to reading and keeping up on the news, it may be a surprise to you that racial profiling is EXTREMELY overplayed by the media...
USArgos 2 years ago
[pt 2] And because of the overwhelming OVERreporting of the idea of racial profiling, a little balance is needed. That is, if you care about perspective.
See, in a civilized society like America, a court system is set up to iron out disputes with each other or the law. We don't just grab a machette and start hacking up the rival tribe.
Ann is an astute, trained lawyer, and she speaks in a language that, when all the emotional crying and bitching is over, really matters in a country like ours.
USArgos 2 years ago
You misunderstood, I'm neither bitching nor crying and I have no emotional ties to this issue. I'm merely saying I don't agree with everything this woman, and other conservatives alike, think and believe. I'm not arguing that she isn't astute or well educated, I just down right don't agree with what she's saying. That's it. I'm sorry you have a problem with people who disagree with you. And you shouldn't talk so condescendingly it makes you come off as an asshole.
SpuffiedGirlie90 2 years ago
Well, as long as your argument comes without legal substance, and Ann's comes from documented court cases, you'll lose every time.
And as far as your problem with being condescended to, I really don't care. Whatever it takes to make irrational reactions such as yours go away, I'm all for. We Conservatives have been trying to help you understand through reasoned dialogue for a LONG time, now, and it seems that with voices such as yours, the problem of ignorance/violence only gets worse.
USArgos 2 years ago
Just because you put yourself on the other side of the spectrum doesn't mean you are right.
In a developed nation like ours, one has to make their claim of racial bias in an intelligent, demonstrable way before acknowledgement and remedy is applied.
These things, once again, are hammered out in a court. If you want to start letting every African American take the law into their hands and start taking revenge on cops, then you have to let all of the European Americans take revenge on THEM.
USArgos 2 years ago
What are your thoughts on gay marriage? I really want to hear this.
SpuffiedGirlie90 2 years ago
Well, let me tell you: by the way you react and switch topics, I can tell that you have a lot of built-up ignorant prejudices about Conservatives. I wish you could read up a little about Conservative thought instead of acting like we're your enemy.
But to answer your question: I think that if you are a taxpayer in this great country, then you should be able to acquire a legally-sanctioned decree of civil union that states you have the same rights of hospital visits of a dying spouse, etc.
USArgos 2 years ago
@USArgos
Sorry but because Andy Schlafly says he's conservative, you're all the enemy.
mrchacko 1 year ago
[pt 2]
But that our society standards should prevent civil unions for mothers and sons, fathers and daughters, brothers and sisters, etc. In other words, I believe in a "civil union" for homosexuals, but not for incestuous relationships of adults and children.
I do not think that any church should be forced to bless a union they don't believe is in their religious doctrine to do so. After all, if a church can legally deny to marry 2 heteros for a reason, they shouldn't be forced 2 for gays.
USArgos 2 years ago
gay marriage is a misnomer in concept. marriage was conceived as a religious institution as a covenant between a man a woman and god for the mutual society,support and protection of a man to a woman and vice versa and for the procreation of children
CamelsAssBangMohmed 2 years ago
That is true based on the Bible. Which is used where? Drum roll please! In Church. So the Church should stay out of Government and the government should stay out of the Church.
mrscorie 2 years ago
since our laws were written 100% by devout christians, i am offended by your position
CamelsAssBangMohmed 2 years ago
Excuse me but I think you should do a little bit more research on that issue. Our founding fathers were not devout christians. Hell the reason why America even exist is because the pioneers that came here was not at all happy with government being so controlled by the Church of England. I think I am really fair. The Government shouldn't tell the Church who they should have marry in their institution and the Church should worry about how the Government defines marriage. That's only fair.
mrscorie 2 years ago
Ann coulter Is just a trouble maker. She defends these deadbeat dads, who leave their kids, For some bimbo blonds, with fake boobs. She blames the single mothers for their problem.
obamaownsrepublicans 2 years ago
why not?? they spread their legs, why should we pay for their mistakes
CamelsAssBangMohmed 2 years ago
Of course she blames the single moms instead of the fathers who leave. Blaming the fathers wouldn't quite sell her books would it. We agree!
mrscorie 2 years ago
Single mothers are little Eichmann's that are dragging down America, she's right. Also, racial profiling is a myth and a scam by race hustlers.
ZDWmiamicane 2 years ago 4
It's not single mothers who are dragging down America. It's the father's who are running from their responsibilities when it comes to taking care of their kids. If Fathers took care of their kids the way they should we wouldn't have so many issues. The fathers need to step up and do their damn jobs. We have states taking care of kids when it should be the father. Ann knows this but of course she is not going to put it like that because that wouldn't sell books now would it.
mrscorie 2 years ago
You are an ignorant dipshit.
I hope you die by spontaneous combustion for your stupidity.
You expect Ann to kiss Obama's ass and if she doesnt she's a racist. If you had your way, the only people that can have an opinion are Blacks and Democrats and republicans would be arrested by the thought police. Get a life.
dalkass 2 years ago 2
She Is a rich blond bimbo. Who does nothing but causes trouble. She really hates It her party lost In 2008. Well republicans need to keep their fucking damn, comments to themselves.
obamaownsrepublicans 2 years ago
it is called freedom of speech comrade, we have it and we will use our rights.... unless you want a civil war with us gun crazy rednecks
CamelsAssBangMohmed 2 years ago
[pt4]
See where all of these is leading? Who wants to go back to a Third World existence where we solve every dispute with machettes?
I mean, this society is pretty good to it's minorities--just ask all of the millionaire blacks, Latinos, Asians, and Arab folks who have made it here.
When the knee-jerk blacks who try to hype up the notion of "racial profiling" (and not all blacks do, of course), go unanswered, society loses. Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Louis Farrakhan lead the lot, sadly.
USArgos 2 years ago
@USArgos:
"This society is pretty good to it's minorities." You have got to be kidding me.
Arienhn 4 months ago
@Arienhn
yeah, what's funny is..white people are always telling us what we do and do not experience....wtf?
DivinelyMochaDipped 3 months ago
Wow! Two beautiful, classy, conservative women having an intelligent exchange of ideas. I'm in HEAVEN!
downstairshudson 2 years ago 2
Ann can kick that low carb RACE-BAITER to the CURB!
GO ANN!
NoCensorshipYT 2 years ago 2