Finally getting a DSL 100 again!. Had (3) of em". (3) jmp-1"s,reissue plexi(59),800"s,900"s,. Had other amp too", Laneys(aor)(GH100TI)(GH100L)5150"s-5150III-boogies-ADA-Rocktron-Randalls-yamaha-etc..I will attest that there is NO better amp for rock than MARSHALL!..glad to be home again!
It's a fair test so everyone stop complaining. To me the DSL100 was just like heaven, the MG was actually a lot better than I expected but still didn't have that fat sound that a valve amp has.
Im into classic funk/rock/blues tone but I like to play mostly aside from Zeppelin and Kiss, is Iron Maiden and Slayer and me and my bandmate are trying to decide on which of the 2 is better for like metal but is just as good for like old rock and what not lol Any help on this is greatly apreciated.
I don't know why everybody keeps complaining about those MG series amps. I mean there are really good amps, not better than tubes but still good nevertheless. If you take a close look at Marshall's overpriced shit on the market, the MG is quite cheap for a person that desires a little bit of quality in a shitty half-stack.
the MG100HDFX is really good for a solid state, and i loved it. then I got a VOX VT40+ (which is only half tube) and honestly i got sounds out of the vox that absolutely destroyed the HDFX.
@scotty688 sorry but it really don't have low ends, thought its 4X12 its sounds very thin compared to tube amps and many other solid amps, it doesn't give the punch
I enjoyed the sound of the MG all the way up to the "Tush" riff and the single note lines at the end. In the beginning I actually preferred the MG's tone to the DSL, but on the Tush riff and the single not lines the MG became very mushy. I notice some folks are extremely partial due to the tube and ss debate. Some would take a horrible sounding tube amp instead of a sweet sounding ss. It's a status thing more so than sound. Tube does more often have much better tone, but not in every case.
So I'm assuming the first one was the DSL. Any professional guitar player knows that SS is not in the same league as Tube. That being said the HDFX wasn't horrible. The DSL is just far superior. Although the tones on either weren't dialed in how I'd like them. It was pretty clear which was better. Again the SS is only trying to sound like the Tube. People think too often SS are for metal or something when that is totally incorrect. Believe me good tone regardless of the genre you'll find in a T
Im definitely digging the sound of the MG100HDFX a lot better. It seems like it would suit the type of music that I play a lot better than the DSL would. Great playing, by the way!
Did you have the dsl cranked up a bit mate? I know with mine it needs to be at around 4.5-5 to sound good and then over that sounds awesome. But below 4 the distortion sounds too fuzzy and crappy, really need to be turned up
I've got 2 MG100 HDFX half stacks that I run together, and a JCM800...
For crunch, I prefer the MG heads... They've got the CONTOUR control, which lets you vary between the older Marshall's and the newer ones. Running 2 of them, just allows me to dial in the EXACT tone I'm looking for.
MG sounds better on the leads, but probably just because the tone is sharper. The DSL sounds better on chords and riffs, but either amp is pretty good. It's mostly all about the prestige of tubes. Besides, the audience normally doesn't know the difference between tube and solid, they just see Marshall and hear a badass song played through it.
Yea. If you put the amps in the same position the sound wont be very different maybe just slight. run the 100 HDFX through that 1960 cab and it will sound amazing.
i think one part of the sound difference would be the distance from the camera that each amp is. But i still think the DSL is a bit better, but also look at the prices of the too. both great amps....but definitely not around the same price range...id go for the HDFX....it still has some power...but not quite as much as the DSL
hey i have the mg100hdfx and im telling you this is a kick ass amp. u need to work with the settings though, it took me awhile but i got a really awesome tone out of it. ya its obviously not better than a tube amp but the mg100 is epic
Well, in my opinion if you have the money go for the dsl, that is my dream amp along with the marshall 1959 plexi model, but i do have the MG100hdgx and it has been a great amp, I can get one hell of a sound out of that with my les paul and its good enough for me.
lucky you have a gibson les paul or epiphone les paul and two marshall amps and you have more les pauls can i have one if so illl take your crappiest one
@fritosofdoritos Guitarcenter has DSL 40 watt combos on there used section of there website for like $500-$600 Marshall was really stupid one day and decided to discontinue the DSL series and now they have something called the MA which in my opinon suck
that was great ! I've been looking into buying a marshall amp and not sure where to go. Thanks for doing that comparison the way you did. That helped a lot. Thanks man !
i actually have both. use em for live dsl for me and the mg100hdfx for the other guitarist... and my god the mg has serious volume its fantastic... for a solid state head its amazin
Ask yourself this, Tube amps have to turned up to get them to really shine, so until you crank them your never gonna see the real differences between the two, the DSL will BEAST the MG solid state thing when there cranked, good video and good playing though :)
Mmm... I think that both amps are awesome, the mg has more raw noisy sound perfect for raw noisy music (punk, metal,...), whereas the dsl has very warm sound for classic rock, hard rock, blues, etc... (:
heres a solution to try for you ppl who own hdfx's. buy a microphone tube preamp and replace the tube in it with a high quality guitar amp tube such as one manufactured by fender. this will help a whole whole bunch and its less than $150
DSL sounded better to me...but I think the MG was not bad at all. Sounded like the mids were cut out on the MG. I'd like to hear the comparison with the mids up on the MG because I am curious as to how close the two amps will sound the same.
Anyone interested in buying this half stack who lives in the north new jersey area please contact me. Some clips on my channel. I am selling it for $500 with MG100HDFX head and MG 4x12 cabinet. Standard edition, the black one.
i just played at a tattoo expo holding about a thousand people and believe me when i say my dsl 100 was on 4 and if i had the mg i would have been screwed!! your also using a crappy cab for the dsl if u used a 1960 b cab your camera would break my friend. i could get the MG sound off of my computer distortion that what mg sounds like to me.
There's a problem with this video. The problem is that I can hear you picking while playing the DSL. people are indifferent to this video because you have the volume at 3ish afaik. The DSL really starts to shine (Like any marshall tube) at volumes above Five.
This is very true, but the stock fuses from marshall tend to blow above five. If youre planning on getting the power tubes really hot, I'd recommend switching to a better fuse (I use Buss 1A slow blow.)
Great video but to dispel a lot of this one sounds richer this one sounds more resonant etc. you should do a video where you use them on the other's CABINET.
This will show just how overwhelming the influence of speakers and cabinet size are.
Also sounds like you have the HDFX running with the mids scooped out. Kick them back in and I bet these amps don't sound all that different.
Unless you do BIG gigs (these things are insanely loud) and don't mind moving these things around just buy a small sub 100 watt modelling amp like a Roland Cube or something. Marshall valve heads are not very versitile, expensive, somewhat delicate, and heavy. Keep your money unless you're CERTAIN you need one of these things.
Sure, the usefulness of big Marshall stacks IS debatable but I did allow for that in my argument. If you're sure you need one go for it but there are problems with them: volume, versitility, practicality, and reliability.
Finally getting a DSL 100 again!. Had (3) of em". (3) jmp-1"s,reissue plexi(59),800"s,900"s,. Had other amp too", Laneys(aor)(GH100TI)(GH100L)5150"s-5150III-boogies-ADA-Rocktron-Randalls-yamaha-etc..I will attest that there is NO better amp for rock than MARSHALL!..glad to be home again!
dewycatt2112 1 week ago
u should be in love with gibbons ;)
kenjik16 2 months ago
you're a great guitarist sir! :)
ThrashMetalAJM 2 months ago
It's a fair test so everyone stop complaining. To me the DSL100 was just like heaven, the MG was actually a lot better than I expected but still didn't have that fat sound that a valve amp has.
JEUXolim 2 months ago
the dsl 100 also has the mid scoop and bass boost buttons that the mg doesn't. Are either of those buttons engaged? that would make a difference too
snoochez112 3 months ago
definetely the Marshall MG100 HDFX
rickru1 4 months ago
The MG does seem sharper, would need to hear them both in person\
leanidis300 5 months ago
Im into classic funk/rock/blues tone but I like to play mostly aside from Zeppelin and Kiss, is Iron Maiden and Slayer and me and my bandmate are trying to decide on which of the 2 is better for like metal but is just as good for like old rock and what not lol Any help on this is greatly apreciated.
Blackdragon52k 6 months ago
trash that solid state junk! DSL sounds warmer and fuller.
dewycatt2112 6 months ago
I don't know why everybody keeps complaining about those MG series amps. I mean there are really good amps, not better than tubes but still good nevertheless. If you take a close look at Marshall's overpriced shit on the market, the MG is quite cheap for a person that desires a little bit of quality in a shitty half-stack.
sndgarden 7 months ago
the gain settings are diffrent how can you conpare them? this is stupid
rocker100991 8 months ago 5
@greensp4rk obviously you didn't read my 2nd comment. i said it was solid state with digital effects. i had a brain fart the first time sorry
that1stupidkid613 8 months ago
the MG100HDFX is really good for a solid state, and i loved it. then I got a VOX VT40+ (which is only half tube) and honestly i got sounds out of the vox that absolutely destroyed the HDFX.
greensp4rk 8 months ago
@liamzuid lol woops typo i meant solid state with digital effects.
that1stupidkid613 8 months ago
@liamzuid tube
that1stupidkid613 8 months ago
@that1stupidkid613 noo... its not, its solid state.
greensp4rk 8 months ago
Is the mg100hdfx solid state or tube?
liamzuid 9 months ago
@liamzuid solid state
IbanezArtist13 6 months ago
Do u play the riff on the mg or dsl the first time through? I like the first on better.
Mrsamlki 9 months ago
@Mrsamlki the first one is the DSL
dcooper830 9 months ago
The DSL is better, but if you can't afford one of the expensive Marshalls, the MG is awesome
Glockenator 10 months ago
You look just like my step step grandpa.
A7Xblood 10 months ago
mg100hdfx sounds alot better, much more deep and has oomph! some of these people on here just hate the 100hdfx for no reason!
horrormovies88 10 months ago
Devil's Child!! Yeah Priest fuckin rules!
KISS4evr 10 months ago
I think the Eq in Dsl is different from the Mg. Mg's sound is too low against with Dsl. Thats my opinion.
MrHussika 10 months ago
Obviously the DSL is wayyy better than the Mg, not fair.... its like a fight between Chuck Norris to larry the cable guy
PeterMilenk 10 months ago
Comment removed
scotty688 10 months ago
@scotty688 sorry but it really don't have low ends, thought its 4X12 its sounds very thin compared to tube amps and many other solid amps, it doesn't give the punch
juntti02 10 months ago
Note how when he plays with the MG you can hear the unamplified sound of the guitar much more.
swanky23 11 months ago
what were you running it through?
IMHO the MG100HDFX sounded better.
Bobby59 11 months ago
make an up date and use both amps threw the 1960 cabs to get a more fair test
akaboo69 11 months ago
both are close
akaboo69 11 months ago
Do you know if the dsl head would work with the mg412a cab?
ady0211 1 year ago
DSL!!!!!!!
thestooty 1 year ago
Comment removed
XhannahplaysguitarX 1 year ago
u do realize this is unfair... its obvious its the dsl which is gonna win coz its a tube amp!
nine9live5 1 year ago
The DSL sounds WAY more clear. The MG sounds decent, has a decent "modern" tone to it, but it doesn't hold up to any of the other Marshall amps.
cbmb2647 1 year ago
I enjoyed the sound of the MG all the way up to the "Tush" riff and the single note lines at the end. In the beginning I actually preferred the MG's tone to the DSL, but on the Tush riff and the single not lines the MG became very mushy. I notice some folks are extremely partial due to the tube and ss debate. Some would take a horrible sounding tube amp instead of a sweet sounding ss. It's a status thing more so than sound. Tube does more often have much better tone, but not in every case.
JoeWoodall83 1 year ago
mg100hdfx sounds clearer
blackzabbathfan 1 year ago
So I'm assuming the first one was the DSL. Any professional guitar player knows that SS is not in the same league as Tube. That being said the HDFX wasn't horrible. The DSL is just far superior. Although the tones on either weren't dialed in how I'd like them. It was pretty clear which was better. Again the SS is only trying to sound like the Tube. People think too often SS are for metal or something when that is totally incorrect. Believe me good tone regardless of the genre you'll find in a T
JoshAndHisGuitar 1 year ago
DSL DEFINETELY!!!!!!!!! PURE TUBE!!!
volcom1722 1 year ago
Date an Asian lady lushfmlk.info
guthamwelso 1 year ago
the MG 100HDFX all the way!
stratdem 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@stratdem man you are deaf
leandrop45 1 year ago
i see you have an affinity for classic rock
zazfilm 1 year ago
Im definitely digging the sound of the MG100HDFX a lot better. It seems like it would suit the type of music that I play a lot better than the DSL would. Great playing, by the way!
dumbwiz 1 year ago
I think it's the settings, but I'm liking the MG more...
Canadianspunge 1 year ago
i bet that if you used a decent distortion pedal the dfx would sound pretty good too.
chidorikill 1 year ago
those MG series heads sound like digital garbage
WildGunman77 1 year ago 8
Did you have the dsl cranked up a bit mate? I know with mine it needs to be at around 4.5-5 to sound good and then over that sounds awesome. But below 4 the distortion sounds too fuzzy and crappy, really need to be turned up
Awesome chops by the way
MetalUpTheAss19 1 year ago
I've got 2 MG100 HDFX half stacks that I run together, and a JCM800...
For crunch, I prefer the MG heads... They've got the CONTOUR control, which lets you vary between the older Marshall's and the newer ones. Running 2 of them, just allows me to dial in the EXACT tone I'm looking for.
BTW...Tasty riffs!
boagley1 1 year ago
DSL ftw. the MG sounds like what a tube amp would sound like running on "cold bias test points" tubes kill the competition
mikevmpr3 1 year ago
DSL !
VKzGibson 1 year ago
DFX sounds like mud comparitively. I own the DSL100MLB and used an HDFX and i can say for soli state cheapies the MG series are still fun to play.
diesect33 1 year ago
MG sounds better on the leads, but probably just because the tone is sharper. The DSL sounds better on chords and riffs, but either amp is pretty good. It's mostly all about the prestige of tubes. Besides, the audience normally doesn't know the difference between tube and solid, they just see Marshall and hear a badass song played through it.
Wiseman501 1 year ago
I hate the sound of this DSL... 0.o it sounds all watered down and muffled. The 100HDFX sounds much livelier
T1mPlaysG33tar 1 year ago
@T1mPlaysG33tar I agree it doesn't sound good in this video. I really need to do a better clip with some real mics.
dcooper830 1 year ago
@dcooper830 I think the DFX is muddy in this vid compared to the DSL but, yeah the DSL can get some great tones if you know how to dial them in.
diesect33 1 year ago
@T1mPlaysG33tar same here, i got an MG100HDFX and i love ut
blackzabbathfan 1 year ago 3
JMD series is better than both of em!! lol
ten25go 1 year ago
@ten25go Are you kidding me that thing is the worst sounding amp ever. You can find the DSL 100's on ebay for cheaper and they sound better
headbagger63 1 year ago
mg100 sounds warmer and has a nicer tone but both sound amazing
w3lford4n0 1 year ago
@w3lford4n0 dude! The MG is much less warmer, more compressed and more sterile
asianaxeman 1 year ago
Yea. If you put the amps in the same position the sound wont be very different maybe just slight. run the 100 HDFX through that 1960 cab and it will sound amazing.
ipnutt22 1 year ago
i think one part of the sound difference would be the distance from the camera that each amp is. But i still think the DSL is a bit better, but also look at the prices of the too. both great amps....but definitely not around the same price range...id go for the HDFX....it still has some power...but not quite as much as the DSL
LeftyLP80 1 year ago
Obviously the DSL is gonna be better! THey're still both good amps, the MG is mostly for home use and practising. It's DEFO not a gigging amp like
omerj2000 1 year ago
hey i have the mg100hdfx and im telling you this is a kick ass amp. u need to work with the settings though, it took me awhile but i got a really awesome tone out of it. ya its obviously not better than a tube amp but the mg100 is epic
Diehard804 1 year ago
Well, in my opinion if you have the money go for the dsl, that is my dream amp along with the marshall 1959 plexi model, but i do have the MG100hdgx and it has been a great amp, I can get one hell of a sound out of that with my les paul and its good enough for me.
MrMorningbear631 1 year ago
yay toys in the attic! :D
gus041009 1 year ago
the MG sounds all digital and fake but the dsl is alot more natural and real.
guitarmessiah95 1 year ago
how much is the dsl?
FEARthisGrunt 1 year ago
does this go pretty loud? how many watts? how much did you pay?
69brandin69 1 year ago
dsl sounds more for trebble and the halfstack has more bass
MagrPwnAge 1 year ago
1:33 please tell me wich song is that!
joakoPRIMUS 1 year ago
@joakoPRIMUS Tush by ZZTop
MagrPwnAge 1 year ago
I'd buy the MG because it's a lot cheaper
scotty688 1 year ago
its like putting a tablespoon of water in the ocean. Is it there? Yes. Does it really matter? No.
andrewlloy 1 year ago
DSL, but i have both amps hahaha
maarcel12 1 year ago
why would you compare these amps its a no brainer
rawrlion101 1 year ago
lucky you have a gibson les paul or epiphone les paul and two marshall amps and you have more les pauls can i have one if so illl take your crappiest one
blacklightize 1 year ago
Dsl!
trakir 1 year ago
I think it depends on what you play. Metal... DSL!!!!!!! And then the other for like Van Halen kind of stuff
A7Xblood 1 year ago
Well duh the Dsl is better. It's a tube! That's like comparing a dodge neon to a Ferrari
jonnyshredfayce 1 year ago
damn the tube amp sounds way better xD
JRDN058 1 year ago
haha dsl sounds better, but ill end up buying the hdfx cuz the price. but when your only 15 with no job, you kind of have to buy the cheaper one haha
armthehomeless199 1 year ago
DSL DSL DSL!!!
Dkr84 1 year ago
is there a dsl half stack in the $500 range? possibly 400? someone help with me!
fritosofdoritos 1 year ago
@fritosofdoritos you can use a line switcher
alapunk13 1 year ago
@fritosofdoritos you fucking wish bud :P more like a great deal for the halfstack is 1000
sledboy123456789 1 year ago
@fritosofdoritos Guitarcenter has DSL 40 watt combos on there used section of there website for like $500-$600 Marshall was really stupid one day and decided to discontinue the DSL series and now they have something called the MA which in my opinon suck
guitarmessiah95 1 year ago
@fritosofdoritos nope
trchrichie 1 year ago
okay, one question? How in the hell are you switching between the two like that?
Just got one last night btw, these things kick fucking ass. Tube to solid state isn't even a comparison!!
cessnapilot182 1 year ago
did everyone forget about the clean channel?
roatking 1 year ago
DSL for the win
ElevenBravo 1 year ago
which one would be the best for guns n roses + appittie for destruction?
bjswagger99 1 year ago
DSL 100 is my fucking favourit, i got soon one, have at the moment a Marshall MG100.. but soon.. in one-two months .. then rocknroll extreme!
maarcel12 1 year ago
dsl 100. how much $ was it?
rj5573 1 year ago
THE MARSHALL MG100HDFX has been called the solid state
JCM800 and i would agree with that hands down!
stratdem 1 year ago
that was great ! I've been looking into buying a marshall amp and not sure where to go. Thanks for doing that comparison the way you did. That helped a lot. Thanks man !
neochase1 1 year ago
I've had a DSL for a while, but I'm wondering... What are some good Equalization settings? Like just for Presence, Treble, Middle, and Bass?
CriticsConfession 1 year ago
i could make this decision if i was put into a drug-induced coma
MyManDan 1 year ago
hey man. you ever play any zztop?
FenderBenderXP 1 year ago
MG= Fizzy McFizz
homesnake202 1 year ago
the DSL has more depth to it. the MG sounds a bit too fake, but then again nothing can beat pure valve tone...DSL all the way
VelvetFuckinRevolv3r 1 year ago
the mg has more midrange. the dsl has more treble and bass. Are the amps EQ'd the same? Dosn't sound like it.
82markyboy 1 year ago
they both sound good but i hear more compression in the MG.
MadSciontist28 1 year ago
the Mg sounds flat as a fart...sounds like its muffeled..
gnrnmbr1 1 year ago
mg100
ihatenjoi 1 year ago
why would you even consider comparing them?? ! XD
nice dude
horsecoollover19 1 year ago
i actually have both. use em for live dsl for me and the mg100hdfx for the other guitarist... and my god the mg has serious volume its fantastic... for a solid state head its amazin
brimill1980 1 year ago
Ask yourself this, Tube amps have to turned up to get them to really shine, so until you crank them your never gonna see the real differences between the two, the DSL will BEAST the MG solid state thing when there cranked, good video and good playing though :)
MrDogsbody 1 year ago
Compared to the DSL, the MG has the tone of a transistor radio! Nice classic licks!
AGK972 1 year ago
Mmm... I think that both amps are awesome, the mg has more raw noisy sound perfect for raw noisy music (punk, metal,...), whereas the dsl has very warm sound for classic rock, hard rock, blues, etc... (:
(sorry for my english)
fgonzalezb1990 1 year ago
heres a solution to try for you ppl who own hdfx's. buy a microphone tube preamp and replace the tube in it with a high quality guitar amp tube such as one manufactured by fender. this will help a whole whole bunch and its less than $150
yourguitarist89 1 year ago
DSL all the way!
TheMosseh 1 year ago 14
dsl!!
giammygiammy 1 year ago 9
dsl!DSL!DSL!DSL!
12345678ix 1 year ago 3
DSL All The Way !!!
DeivasLT 1 year ago 3
i heard that the dsl has a lot of hiss or buzz. can u verify?
jackman94 1 year ago
The DSL is supposed to be like 1000x better than a MG. But in this video the MG sounds way better.
asda6572 1 year ago 2
DSL sounded better to me...but I think the MG was not bad at all. Sounded like the mids were cut out on the MG. I'd like to hear the comparison with the mids up on the MG because I am curious as to how close the two amps will sound the same.
sccloser 1 year ago 3
That's true the MG somehow has more modern sound to it. Pretty decent amp but expensive for what it is.
topografer 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anyone interested in buying this half stack who lives in the north new jersey area please contact me. Some clips on my channel. I am selling it for $500 with MG100HDFX head and MG 4x12 cabinet. Standard edition, the black one.
Ewwwww916 1 year ago
There's too much gain on both of them. It's hard to hear how an amp sounds when it's buried in distortion.
murfdog19 1 year ago
the dsl sounds cleaner and the mg is like a heavier sound
jackman94 1 year ago
thank you so much for demoing this i read good reviews, but wanted to hear it.
90sRockWhore 1 year ago
i just played at a tattoo expo holding about a thousand people and believe me when i say my dsl 100 was on 4 and if i had the mg i would have been screwed!! your also using a crappy cab for the dsl if u used a 1960 b cab your camera would break my friend. i could get the MG sound off of my computer distortion that what mg sounds like to me.
LENNYlanes 1 year ago
i have no idea how but the MG f***ing anihalated the DSL!
lavalamp360 1 year ago
same thing i was thinking, it sounds more raunchola, balls out, dirty. nasty.
i have to buy it.
90sRockWhore 1 year ago
mg100 sounds more dirty
123marijn321 1 year ago
does the Mg100 have built in effects? by Mg100 i mean the red one haha
ThePiffinator 1 year ago
@ThePiffinator yes, it has flanger, chorus, delay, and chorus-delay
ZakkHendrix666 1 year ago
ok what about distortion effects does it have those as well sorry i forgot to ask that in the previous comment.
ThePiffinator 1 year ago
@ThePiffinator you can turn the effects on on either of the 4 channels.
ZakkHendrix666 1 year ago
dsl sound so much better.. the mg, to me at least sound so compressed and boxed in... plus with a solid state you get all of that nasty hum
lostsurfer660 1 year ago
yeah it does, i still like the difference though
90sRockWhore 1 year ago
You should run them in stereo for us as well.
tbirdpunk 1 year ago
No power tubes, No legendary marshall tone.
stickyjeans69 1 year ago
There's a problem with this video. The problem is that I can hear you picking while playing the DSL. people are indifferent to this video because you have the volume at 3ish afaik. The DSL really starts to shine (Like any marshall tube) at volumes above Five.
stickyjeans69 1 year ago
This is very true, but the stock fuses from marshall tend to blow above five. If youre planning on getting the power tubes really hot, I'd recommend switching to a better fuse (I use Buss 1A slow blow.)
bigfish0804 1 year ago
THe MG sounds better. Wow.
themaninblac 2 years ago
Oh damn, the tone you got from the MG surprised me...
DarkAEon91 2 years ago
Great video but to dispel a lot of this one sounds richer this one sounds more resonant etc. you should do a video where you use them on the other's CABINET.
This will show just how overwhelming the influence of speakers and cabinet size are.
Also sounds like you have the HDFX running with the mids scooped out. Kick them back in and I bet these amps don't sound all that different.
JonDeth 2 years ago
awesome vid. very informative!
nickl882 2 years ago
just bought a dsl 100. traded my peavey 5150 and only hadto pay 200. such a good choice
tonyd927 2 years ago
IMHO, the DSL sounds a lot more articulate, and the MG sounds really dark and nasally.
Good thing I'm getting me a DSL 100 soon. :D
AsAngelsFall221 2 years ago
Is the DSL all-tube?
ilyazvyagin 2 years ago
DSL all the way! its tube!!!
809Metallica 2 years ago
hells yes
12345678ix 2 years ago
so hard to have a marshall fauvorite when theres so many of them
feggman2 2 years ago
I really enjoyed this video.
Not going to say which I like best, Because, I like both just differently.
But, what are your settings for the MG?
Newmapsofsocal 2 years ago
im thinking of getting either of these which one does every1 think sounds better
powsheep 2 years ago
@powsheep DSL trust me it sound much better up realy loud.
ffafc 2 years ago
@ffafc WHAT IS THE DIFF IN PRICE
PWNZRS1 2 years ago
@PWNZRS1 bout 500 quid :-[
ffafc 2 years ago
od channel sucks dick
roberthlubnaomi 2 years ago
Im curious, does it use valves?
DaveRingle 2 years ago
i like both.
ruffles272 2 years ago
shit,you have put different eq and how can you compare a valve amp with a transistor one???
bizkitfren 2 years ago 3
dsl !!!
lastangelsofrock 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
they sound incredibly similar to me especially since the DSL costs about twice as much
bigassmatic 2 years ago
Yeah but don't forget, the quality of the video isn't amazing, in real life or in the studio, you would hear a big difference between the two.
hardrockerdave94 2 years ago 4
Haha, I don't know why I even posted that comment. He has them dialed in to sound like each other anyway.
bigassmatic 2 years ago
The DSL can give you a great clean and an insane metal tone and everything inbetween.
SoCaldiamond89 2 years ago
so which one is better for metal music ?
rygo30 2 years ago
Comment removed
rrbmirgamid 2 years ago
MG100HDFX!
Lve the sound!
loserke30 2 years ago
big amps dont make u good
freaknoid46 2 years ago
@freaknoid46
just rich
musclekid13 2 years ago
dude fuck u he sucks
freaknoid46 2 years ago
DSL of course
ViLLZzZz 2 years ago
TYVM for doing that I will be saving up 700 more for the DSL Again TYVM
K1S1 2 years ago
probably the best mg i've ever heard with those v30 clones!
apguitarguy401 2 years ago
you talk to much trash
rudoman22 2 years ago
shut up douche bag
rudoman22 2 years ago 3
the dsl has more dynamics but the mg isn't bad to...but the mg burns up really easy so be carful!!
lespaulreborn 2 years ago
Unless you do BIG gigs (these things are insanely loud) and don't mind moving these things around just buy a small sub 100 watt modelling amp like a Roland Cube or something. Marshall valve heads are not very versitile, expensive, somewhat delicate, and heavy. Keep your money unless you're CERTAIN you need one of these things.
wikichris 2 years ago
dude thats debatable, i used mine before we started doing gigs and it works out really nice even in ur home
BrokenHeadlights13 2 years ago
Sure, the usefulness of big Marshall stacks IS debatable but I did allow for that in my argument. If you're sure you need one go for it but there are problems with them: volume, versitility, practicality, and reliability.
wikichris 2 years ago
volume: 4 out 5
Versatility:5 out 5
Practically: 2 out of 5
relabiity 4 out of 5 stars
but thats just my opinion
BrokenHeadlights13 2 years ago
You can't give a Marshall stack 5 out of 5 for versatility.
You can but no one will take your seriously.
If that gets a 5 you've no room to describe the variety a good modelling amp can give you.
wikichris 2 years ago
its good versatility for the type of stuff we play
BrokenHeadlights13 2 years ago