@club4ghz This video shows this object as a single star. When you look at a distant galaxy you see the center plus a cluster of stars around it. there's no way to single out one star from a distant galaxy let alone the most distant galaxy. Not with our telescopes anyway.
@club4ghz I don't think a supernova star would be brighter than the center of the galaxy. Even if it is when you look at a distant galaxy you see the WHOLE galaxy! This video claims this to be a single star! There are no cluster of stars around this object. A single point of light could be either a star or a distant galaxy. But you cannot see just one star in a distant galaxy. Maybe this is the most distant star in our own galaxy but cannot be just one star in a distant galaxy.
Sorry, but you're simply wrong about this. A supernova can in fact be brighter than the center of the galaxy; it can briefly outshine the entire galaxy it inhabits (unless the galaxy is exceptionally bright). The sudden brightening of a distant galaxy, such as in this case, is easily explained by the supernova explosion of a single star. In this case, the exposure is simply not long enough to capture the light of the containing galaxy.
It's all about brightness. Gamma-ray bursts can, for a short time, be the brightest objects in the entire Universe if you happen to be within the path of the beam. So if a star in a very distant galaxy goes supernova and beams a gamma-ray burst at us, it can be easily visible all the way across the Universe.
@pseudorandomly I get what you're saying. But I'm still under the impresion that this video is claiming that this object is a single star. Are you saying that this object is an entire galaxy that's brighter because of a supernove star?
Not precisely. What I'm saying is that there is probably an agglomeration of stars there (whether it qualifies as a "galaxy" at that young age is a matter of interpretation). What has happened is that a single star in that agglomeration has gone supernova, creating a gamma-ray beam that happened to point in our direction, which we see as a gamma-ray burst. This object is a single star; the whole *galaxy* isn't brighter, just the supernova within it -- the other stars are unchanged.
Think of it like this -- put a collection of light bulbs in a glass box and turn them on. Now place the glass box a long distance away; so far that you can barely, if at all, detect the lights. Now set off one large flashbulb in that box. Originally, you see the box as a tiny faint blob of light, if you detect it at all. Then the flashbulb goes off and suddenly the box appears *hugely* brighter, even though just one bulb is responsible for the brightening.
@pseudorandomly Yes I do see what you're saying. It's just that this video claims this to be the most distant object (meaning one object I guess) but doesn't say anything about being in another galaxy. But you may be right.
I confess to not understanding your confusion. Suppose this supernova was a star sitting out in space all by itself, not part of some galaxy. What possible difference could that make?
@pseudorandomly Because stars do not exist if not in part of galaxies. The only way to be formed is by the compaction of molecular clouds (which only exist in galaxies) and once they are formed, they are trapped by the gravity of the massive black hole in the center.
I'm not sure you're following the point of the conversation we were having. The OP was confused about "object", "galaxy", and "supernova" in some manner that I was unable to fully understand. I was postulating an isolated star in an attempt to figure out the source of his confusion.
@pseudorandomly The only starts "not in galaxies" are globular clustarts, which exist in galaxy halo's. Which are in the vicinity of galaxies, but a star just sitting in space, not orbiting a galaxy, is non-existant
You are mostly correct, but not completely. Galaxy collisions can draw out long tidal tails, from which it is possible that individual stars could escape altogether. In addition, it is *known* that stars can be ejected from a galaxy by gravitational interactions near the core; not only is this possible in theory, but we have observations of at least one such runaway star in the Local Group that belongs to no galaxy.
@pseudorandomly I wasn't following the conversation, just read this one comment. Do you know the name or where I can find further information about the lone star in the Local Group? I'm curious, I've never heard of this before, I'd love to know more.
Search for "hypervelocity star" and you'll find lots of material. In particular, there'll be a hit on hubblesite for "Hyperfast Star Was Booted from Milky Way" about a star designated HE 0437-5439. You may also be interested in a search for "intergalactic globular cluster" -- entire globular clusters that roam between the galaxies. NGC 2419 *may* be one, in fact (there is some doubt).
That takes rather a lot of explaining. Briefly, we can tell how far away distant objects are by measuring how fast they are moving away. We split the light from the star into its constituent colors (called a spectrum), and note the positions of dark lines in that spectrum that correspond to absorption from known elements such as hydrogen. The position of these lines changes with speed; we can calculate the corresponding speed and relate the speed to the object's distance.
When the light is very faint, there are other related features in the spectrum that we can use rather than looking for individual lines which may not show up in very dim objects. This gives us a somewhat less precise, but still reasonably well-determined distance.
@kaam0s Say that to the US government who spends 59% of the tax money on the military.. nasa is doing something extremely good and important, so that we one day can leave this dying diseased planet.
@ProtestantsRUs God didn't make the universe. He didn't make anything. Even if he was real he made earth and nothing more, so your precious bible says. This is science, evolution and the big bang.
@flarekary Still, at least is has a basis. It makes a lot more sense and has actually proven facts which make a lot more sense then "hey magic man in the sky thanks for the universe and shit"
well, the universe is aproximatevly 13.75 billion years old and this thing is 13.1 billion light years away. if you do the math you will have ~600 million years.
Excuse my ignorance, but she said this explosion happened ~600Million years after the big bang, yet it's 13.1 BILLION light years away. So how come the light has travelled faster than the spped of light to Earth for us to record. Or is it because space is expanding faster than the speed of light over this period? Thanks! Wilz
@williamwills Trust me if NASA knew what hell they are saying they could of feel embarrass for their comments. Unfortunately there are bunch of idiots working for NASA that is the whole reason they still don't understand how our universe is functioning. But they are good out of it to make fun of others they way they speak. For them is more important how well you speak English they care less if does guys have brain or not to be scientists.
Humm means that that star exploded 13.1 bilion years ago so if we take correct that universe is 13.7 bilion years old it must have been a super massive Helium-Lithium-Hydrogen star , with more helium than hydrogen becouse it lasted only 600 milion years , if that's true it was the first supernova in the known universe , otheriwse they may be wrong a universe may be older , somewhat near 17 bilion years or so
@highguy420100 the observable universe is said to be 13.7 billion light years. But since there is no light outside that range It's probably even bigger.
i have a question that i hope you can answer. will that kind of thing ever happen to the earth way into the future, i mean like sometime the earth has have to do something durastic into the future. (sorry cant spell ;) ) so if you can answer please answer
@bulletproof1098 This image is of a dying star, not a planet. Our sun will die at some point in the future but it is likely that we will have destroyed ourselves long before then (if we are unable to change our current social paradigm). Then of course there is always the apocalyptic meteor scenario (the kind that wiped out the dinosaurs) which we are long overdue... The bottom line is that nothing in the universe is static. All matter is in motion and nothing lasts forever. Hope this helps.
@InvertedFox GREAT, now how am I suppose to get any sleep. lol nah I kid, I already know all this stuff :P. It's why I always have a happy disposition. Cause as far as I'm concerned "LIVE EVERYDAY TO IT'S FULLEST" cause who knows when the next meteor / commet will strike or any form of Stella object will strike. hell could even be a black hole. WELL goodnight world, I'm off to sleep soundly knowing there is a chance we may not wake up tomorrow. :P WWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
relax man. the sun is at the mid point of its life cycle. It will last another 4 billion years or so, which which point humanity will have to move on to some place else, but there have already been discoveries of many earth like planets around other stars, so there will be plenty of places to go. So relax ... and get yourself a good engineering education in the meanwhile.
@nightowl8936 Yes, but those planets are lightyears away from us. Even if we could design a space craft of sorts, it would take centuries before we reach it.
guys u dont get it , big bang is not so raelistic . The ends of our ''known'' universe is moving with the speed of light , also the light from that point moves of course with the light speed , now do a simple math and u will find that the '' movement '' is 0 . this means that because we cannot ''see'' the rest of the universe it doesnt mean it doesnt exist . thats a theory .
@MegaChristaras From what I have learned the light moves at the same speed for every observer so it cannot be 0 its speed is the same from whatever it is coming from that's special relativity and the movement of the universe cannot be equal to the speed of light because only light travels at the speed of light, so the light is traveling towards us at the speed of light, it might however, never reached us yet. Although i cant be so sure someone who's actually a scientist please enlighten me :)
@Exmortus100 no the light's speed is not zero. the total movement is zero . since the universe is moving backwords and the light forward it equals 0 .and of course everything is about the relativity . ex . we see 100 miles and after thats its dark . lets say that spot ., the 100 miles , equals 0 for the observer there . he can see something for 100 miles and so on . i will pm u cause im out of words
@Exmortus100 kai nai . t dn mporeis n ktlbs re s .t sumpan dn kinite . epektinete . emeis eimaste sto simio A kai mporume na doume to astro X sto simeio +B . mexri ekei . meta terma . apo t shmeio +B sto astro X o allos mporei na dei t shmeio ++B kai to astro V . fantasou mia sfera . me diametro 100 . esu eisai sto kentro egw stn akri . mporeis na deis 100 to idio k egw 100 mazi exoume 200 .
The universe is one big mother fucker. We can't even see a minute fraction of it because of a limited visual technology. Galileo would be shitting bricks if he could see as far and well as we can today. Just imagine how far and clear we will be able to see in another 500 years. We'll probably be able to see an alien scratching his ass in another galaxy up close.
@iclb00285 Just FYI..My comment was directed to ChristAmbassador1 (ChAm1). Harold is ChAm1's role model, not mine. As you can see from my comment, I copied and pasted ChAm1's post, which is the post he puts every where, and changed "God" to "Harold" and then replied it back to him. So your comment should not be directed to me but to him. So read the entire comment discussion and understand youtube's comment structure before you say anything. I am not a campingite, nor shall I ever be.
@aGxpredator youre right,,, and the question of god existance is also the answear!!! to have an existance you have tou be created by something and on and on,,,so god have to be born somehow,,by peoaple who are born,by other,,etch,,so its just dont have sens
@aGxpredatorthe answear is in the question,,,a living composition,,like animals or human for exemple,,need to be made the same way than everyone here have been made,,so dont tell me god apear like thats and start to do wath he wanted,,,it fucking imposib ,,and believing to this just demonstrate a blockage and a emptiness of the consciousness of the '''believing"" peoaple on our planet,,im not making a war,,out of thats,,because im ruled by the goodsens and my consciousness of my surrounding!!!
@aGxpredator i dont need answear i already got mine,,too bad if you cant understand,,and by the way im not using anglish as first language,,so stop to be arogant and start dev eloping your brain fonctionality.
@aGxpredator i dont need answear i already got mine,,too bad if you cant understand,,and by the way im not using anglish as first language,,so stop to be arogant and start dev eloping your brain fonctionality.wich iyou seem to do very well.
That's a supernova, some of those can get (albiet for a very short time span from an astronomical standpoint) more luminous than the entire galaxy they occur in or even several times brighter if viewed from the right angle. Look up type 1a supernova, those were the extremely distant objects which contributed to the theory that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.
Wow. This is the first animation ever of a supernova producing a cyclotron beam. (I think) Usually they're shown as just massive exploding balls of fireworks.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nothing Else Matters except Jesus Christ the only True Wise Eternal God of all Creation. To Him be all Power. Majesty, Honor, and Glory forever and ever. He and He alone has declared the END from the Beginning.May 21, 2011 And now in these last days He is saving a great multitude more than any man can number whom He has chosen before time began(EPH 1:4) Then,He will destroy all those wicked who continually reject His Word with everlasting destruction(2Thes 1:9)wwwWeCanKnowCOM;EBiblefellowshipCom
@ChristAmbassador1 I'll tell you what. on May 22, 2011 (my sister's birthday), why don't you come over for the party. I've also got another bash scheduled on December 22, 2012 (my birthday). Same invite.
Nothing Else Matters except Harold Camping the only True Wise Eternal Man of all Creation. To Harold be all Power. Majesty, Honor, and Glory forever and ever. Harold and He alone has declared the END from the Beginning.May 21, 2011 And now in these last days Harold is saving a great multitude more than any man can number whom Harold has chosen before time began Then,Harold will destroy all those wicked who continually reject Harold's Word with everlasting destruction.
@0glenbenton0 Even if the universe spreads or not, what is beneath and beyond its limits??? And what was there before the creation of the world?? Nothingness?? Give me the definition of nothingness??? Can anybody answer this questions??
@PattyDLuffy Those questions have been addressed by philosophers (not very good answers here) and now, more accurately, physicists from all around the world for thousands of years. There is no definite answer yet. Many would agree "nothingness" and other "not perceivable from a rational perspective" concepts are undefinable by nature. If you really want to know you´ll have to wait or join the most brilliant minds alive in the search of the "ultimate answers"...good luck with that though.
so basically its a ray of light that is traveling at the satellite but is so far away that even at the speed of light, you can still see it coming, space is amazing!
First of all there was no BIG BANG if you want to know why ask i have really good reasons why
THEN SECOND OF ALL
the galaxy NEVER ends it will never end think about it after something ends wats after that SOOOOO something had to be after that so that was just another random star
And also, you said the galaxy NEVER ends. I'm assuming you meant "universe" not galaxy, so let me ask why you say the universe never ends? if you really did mean galaxy then your in a world of your own, but im assuming it was a typo.
@0GlenBenton0 Yes i meant Universe because how could it end just take a minute and think say the universe ends whats after that? something else right? and the big boom could not have happened because think about that to have you ever seen any type of an explosion create something.
And how the hell would a explosion make atoms colors gravity use
( Only someone who loves can make something that loves)
Just because your mind cannot comprehend it, doesn't mean that you are right or wrong. It is unknowable, so why bother trying to debate it?
And also, how much do you know about the current big bang theory, and who taught you it? Was it your pastor? I'm not saying it is right, as it is not a stable theory, but pretty much everything you think you know about it is wrong. Try actually researching something before you spout nonsense all over YouTube.
@0GlenBenton0 Tell me one explosion that created everything NOt one. And no i did research and i stay on my theory that nothing exempt God could make this im not saying im one of those people who are always talking about god but really think about it a big boom created everything the universe never ends that means the big boom had to never end and is still going and if that was true then that would send energy waves back which would harm our solar system that honestly could be a jock a big boom
I smell a troll... but your channel makes me think you are serious. Your obviously a kid, and you should probably leave debating to the grown ups, or at least ask someone to teach you the big bang theory. Its not called the 'big boom'. Its the Big Bang. And it was not an explosion, it was an expansion of space. Space is not flat, it is a sphere. You clearly have not researched it, otherwise you would not attacking a completely different theory which nobody on earth believes in.
@Hyroile There are a few things that support the Big Bang. The Comic Microwave Background Radiation, the entirely uniform Electromagnetic Pulse that NASA discovered, the fact our universe has been proven to be expanding. Scientific theories have tangible data to support them, to many people misinterpret the term "theory" in the scientific context as being the same as just an idea. Not the same.
If you believe in God, don't you think he made us with minds to question things?
@HighCardWins "Scientific theories have tangible data to support them," hey a scientific theory is just that a theory and may or may not be true, a hypothesis is true untill proven false
@Dannyekimyan O yea because your channel is much better my brother made those rome total war videos and your not very smart if you don't know someone and judge him you don't know me and you make decisions about me your much smarter then me ( wink)
people didn't even step on the moon and are talking about how the universe was mad pathetic they cant see farther then there noises
@WallEandEveRock You dont know anything so please dont judge you dont know where and what i saw so just dont think of your self like you know something
Evolutionist crap. Always need millions of years to push their religion.
poplarpublications 1 week ago
0:16 so THATS were vegeta's galick gun ended up!
hmmm i wonder where all those kamehameha waves ended up 0_o
repulic5 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Schnäutzelbärtchen!
levin18081994 2 weeks ago
I just got fully erectile.
CKelaiditis 3 weeks ago
Pioneer has been travelling for 34 years at huge speed but will take 17500 years to reach ONE light year
cymrutube3 1 month ago
Her voice is really fucking annoying D'X
SpaceBalls74 1 month ago
Sorry but the Holy Bible is the only book of facts and this space stuff is all theories and made up by the devil to take you away from Christianity.
JesusChristRulesYOU 1 month ago
Comment removed
bubbleflappy 1 month ago
How can a star be the most distant object we can see when we can see other galaxies?
bandet888 1 month ago
@bandet888 because this star come from other galaxy 13.1 billion light years away you watching the video and don't understand shit jeez
club4ghz 1 month ago
@club4ghz This video shows this object as a single star. When you look at a distant galaxy you see the center plus a cluster of stars around it. there's no way to single out one star from a distant galaxy let alone the most distant galaxy. Not with our telescopes anyway.
bandet888 1 month ago
@bandet888 this was srupernova exploson they are brighter then whole fucking galaxy
club4ghz 1 month ago
@club4ghz I don't think a supernova star would be brighter than the center of the galaxy. Even if it is when you look at a distant galaxy you see the WHOLE galaxy! This video claims this to be a single star! There are no cluster of stars around this object. A single point of light could be either a star or a distant galaxy. But you cannot see just one star in a distant galaxy. Maybe this is the most distant star in our own galaxy but cannot be just one star in a distant galaxy.
bandet888 1 month ago
@bandet888
Sorry, but you're simply wrong about this. A supernova can in fact be brighter than the center of the galaxy; it can briefly outshine the entire galaxy it inhabits (unless the galaxy is exceptionally bright). The sudden brightening of a distant galaxy, such as in this case, is easily explained by the supernova explosion of a single star. In this case, the exposure is simply not long enough to capture the light of the containing galaxy.
pseudorandomly 1 month ago
@bandet888
It's all about brightness. Gamma-ray bursts can, for a short time, be the brightest objects in the entire Universe if you happen to be within the path of the beam. So if a star in a very distant galaxy goes supernova and beams a gamma-ray burst at us, it can be easily visible all the way across the Universe.
pseudorandomly 1 month ago
@pseudorandomly I get what you're saying. But I'm still under the impresion that this video is claiming that this object is a single star. Are you saying that this object is an entire galaxy that's brighter because of a supernove star?
bandet888 1 month ago
@bandet888
Not precisely. What I'm saying is that there is probably an agglomeration of stars there (whether it qualifies as a "galaxy" at that young age is a matter of interpretation). What has happened is that a single star in that agglomeration has gone supernova, creating a gamma-ray beam that happened to point in our direction, which we see as a gamma-ray burst. This object is a single star; the whole *galaxy* isn't brighter, just the supernova within it -- the other stars are unchanged.
pseudorandomly 1 month ago
@bandet888
Think of it like this -- put a collection of light bulbs in a glass box and turn them on. Now place the glass box a long distance away; so far that you can barely, if at all, detect the lights. Now set off one large flashbulb in that box. Originally, you see the box as a tiny faint blob of light, if you detect it at all. Then the flashbulb goes off and suddenly the box appears *hugely* brighter, even though just one bulb is responsible for the brightening.
pseudorandomly 1 month ago
@pseudorandomly Yes I do see what you're saying. It's just that this video claims this to be the most distant object (meaning one object I guess) but doesn't say anything about being in another galaxy. But you may be right.
bandet888 1 month ago
@bandet888
I confess to not understanding your confusion. Suppose this supernova was a star sitting out in space all by itself, not part of some galaxy. What possible difference could that make?
pseudorandomly 1 month ago
@pseudorandomly Because stars do not exist if not in part of galaxies. The only way to be formed is by the compaction of molecular clouds (which only exist in galaxies) and once they are formed, they are trapped by the gravity of the massive black hole in the center.
NickMinaj69 2 weeks ago
@NickMinaj69
I'm not sure you're following the point of the conversation we were having. The OP was confused about "object", "galaxy", and "supernova" in some manner that I was unable to fully understand. I was postulating an isolated star in an attempt to figure out the source of his confusion.
pseudorandomly 2 weeks ago
@pseudorandomly The only starts "not in galaxies" are globular clustarts, which exist in galaxy halo's. Which are in the vicinity of galaxies, but a star just sitting in space, not orbiting a galaxy, is non-existant
NickMinaj69 2 weeks ago
@NickMinaj69
You are mostly correct, but not completely. Galaxy collisions can draw out long tidal tails, from which it is possible that individual stars could escape altogether. In addition, it is *known* that stars can be ejected from a galaxy by gravitational interactions near the core; not only is this possible in theory, but we have observations of at least one such runaway star in the Local Group that belongs to no galaxy.
pseudorandomly 2 weeks ago
@pseudorandomly I wasn't following the conversation, just read this one comment. Do you know the name or where I can find further information about the lone star in the Local Group? I'm curious, I've never heard of this before, I'd love to know more.
NickMinaj69 2 weeks ago
@NickMinaj69
Search for "hypervelocity star" and you'll find lots of material. In particular, there'll be a hit on hubblesite for "Hyperfast Star Was Booted from Milky Way" about a star designated HE 0437-5439. You may also be interested in a search for "intergalactic globular cluster" -- entire globular clusters that roam between the galaxies. NGC 2419 *may* be one, in fact (there is some doubt).
pseudorandomly 2 weeks ago
Silly scientists that just goku.
chrono4203 1 month ago
and they worked the distance out how?
david90759 1 month ago
@david90759
That takes rather a lot of explaining. Briefly, we can tell how far away distant objects are by measuring how fast they are moving away. We split the light from the star into its constituent colors (called a spectrum), and note the positions of dark lines in that spectrum that correspond to absorption from known elements such as hydrogen. The position of these lines changes with speed; we can calculate the corresponding speed and relate the speed to the object's distance.
pseudorandomly 1 month ago
When the light is very faint, there are other related features in the spectrum that we can use rather than looking for individual lines which may not show up in very dim objects. This gives us a somewhat less precise, but still reasonably well-determined distance.
pseudorandomly 1 month ago
LOVE IT.
quest33613 1 month ago
Chuck Norris goin for a walk...
TakeshiStylezZ 1 month ago
@TakeshiStylezZ CHUCK NORRIS IS A KARATE CHAMP NOT FUCKING JESUS
tuesday2998 1 month ago
@TakeshiStylezZ lmao...hilarity
SMIshroomery321 1 month ago
this knowledge is useless imo. spend the money for saving your own planet, NASA!
kaam0s 1 month ago
@kaam0s Say that to the US government who spends 59% of the tax money on the military.. nasa is doing something extremely good and important, so that we one day can leave this dying diseased planet.
Svedn 1 month ago
@Svedn
59% on military? That's a lot. U sure that's correct?
zed6952 1 month ago
@zed6952 Watch this video: /watch?v=iVr8nS3MxpU&list=FL11b7YyIvwO_pldOJhVpOtg&index=7&feature=plpp_video
Svedn 1 month ago
@Svedn
Watched it. Shit... No wonder we aren't on Mars yet.
zed6952 1 month ago
Everything as in space and the infinite universe has no birth its been all ways
DesertWetBalls 1 month ago
a fart like that would have blasted your a.....
Zac8501 2 months ago
This is just so amazing. Praise the Lord for His wonderful creation in the Universe.
ProtestantsRUs 2 months ago
LOL! Lord?! What are you on about?
tropickman 2 months ago
@ProtestantsRUs God didn't make the universe. He didn't make anything. Even if he was real he made earth and nothing more, so your precious bible says. This is science, evolution and the big bang.
TheGreenskullgaming 2 months ago
@TheGreenskullgaming
Sounds like your stating a fact. Such things like that are purely theoretical and opinion based. Even evolution isn't 100%.
flarekary 2 months ago
@flarekary Still, at least is has a basis. It makes a lot more sense and has actually proven facts which make a lot more sense then "hey magic man in the sky thanks for the universe and shit"
TheGreenskullgaming 2 months ago
@ProtestantsRUs lolnogtfo
TeamApparition 1 month ago
last thursday?
xlr8258 2 months ago
Optical flares
slickboyLA 2 months ago
the big one!!!
shonenarts23 2 months ago
goku doing the kame hame ha
shonenarts23 2 months ago
why is snooki narrating
strawdable 2 months ago
my penis is gigantic
veryfuck 2 months ago
Looks like Chuck Norris is popping balloons again in his backyard.
xhemexx 2 months ago
well, the universe is aproximatevly 13.75 billion years old and this thing is 13.1 billion light years away. if you do the math you will have ~600 million years.
AnTr3Y 2 months ago
QUESTION!!!
Excuse my ignorance, but she said this explosion happened ~600Million years after the big bang, yet it's 13.1 BILLION light years away. So how come the light has travelled faster than the spped of light to Earth for us to record. Or is it because space is expanding faster than the speed of light over this period? Thanks! Wilz
williamwills 2 months ago
@williamwills Trust me if NASA knew what hell they are saying they could of feel embarrass for their comments. Unfortunately there are bunch of idiots working for NASA that is the whole reason they still don't understand how our universe is functioning. But they are good out of it to make fun of others they way they speak. For them is more important how well you speak English they care less if does guys have brain or not to be scientists.
Levon9404 2 months ago
@williamwills The universe is about 13.7 billion years old.
TeamApparition 1 month ago
Someone had too much to drink, BLAHHHHHHHHHHHH
OlCapitain 3 months ago
The voice is very, very bad.
oskardini 3 months ago
FINALLY THEY CAUGHT MY FART ON YOUTUBE
coscorolo 3 months ago 34
@coscorolo
Thanks for making my day LOL TOP YOUTUBE COMMENT IN A WHILE
flarekary 2 months ago
my burb is WWWWWAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY more deadlier than that explosion!
117starpower 3 months ago
fuck I hate this girls' voice. its so conceded like as if I was meant to know about the subject before ever experiencing it.
ZebbMassiv 3 months ago
That explosions got nothing on one of my farts!
ChrisPCrunchy 3 months ago
these videos would be sooo much greater with narration done by randall :D
MrMakachuche 3 months ago
orly? jesus walks there in 3 seconds.
ImHeadshotSniper 3 months ago
DEATHBEAM!!
MintShocker 4 months ago
WTF i was watching minecraft
gjhkhjlo 4 months ago 18
Humm means that that star exploded 13.1 bilion years ago so if we take correct that universe is 13.7 bilion years old it must have been a super massive Helium-Lithium-Hydrogen star , with more helium than hydrogen becouse it lasted only 600 milion years , if that's true it was the first supernova in the known universe , otheriwse they may be wrong a universe may be older , somewhat near 17 bilion years or so
Koroistro 4 months ago
13,1 billion lightyears from earth... why do we care?
ExceedingStudios 4 months ago
@ExceedingStudios Because eventually we will need to learn to predict and avoid these sorts of things for when they occur much close.
EmperorofCartoons 3 months ago
Top 2 comments made my fucking day!
MellonVegan 4 months ago
13.1b light years from earth? strange cause i herd the universe was only 93 million light years big who is right?
highguy420100 4 months ago
@highguy420100 the observable universe is said to be 13.7 billion light years. But since there is no light outside that range It's probably even bigger.
RAFL94 4 months ago
@highguy420100 Billion, not million. 90 billion lightyears. And it is 13.7 billion years old.
winterstellar 4 months ago
Her voice annoys me.
19Jones91 4 months ago
just think its made of the same stuff we are .
rehabib2 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I did that last night!
DarkwithPeace 4 months ago
you know what nightowl8936 maybe you should shut the fuck up and deal with my question, i was asking something big deal, god damn... v.v
bulletproof1098 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bulletproof1098 wow talk self fulfilling prophecies . . . (social paradigm what not)
kilsikon7 5 months ago
i have a question that i hope you can answer. will that kind of thing ever happen to the earth way into the future, i mean like sometime the earth has have to do something durastic into the future. (sorry cant spell ;) ) so if you can answer please answer
bulletproof1098 5 months ago
@bulletproof1098 This image is of a dying star, not a planet. Our sun will die at some point in the future but it is likely that we will have destroyed ourselves long before then (if we are unable to change our current social paradigm). Then of course there is always the apocalyptic meteor scenario (the kind that wiped out the dinosaurs) which we are long overdue... The bottom line is that nothing in the universe is static. All matter is in motion and nothing lasts forever. Hope this helps.
InvertedFox 5 months ago
@InvertedFox GREAT, now how am I suppose to get any sleep. lol nah I kid, I already know all this stuff :P. It's why I always have a happy disposition. Cause as far as I'm concerned "LIVE EVERYDAY TO IT'S FULLEST" cause who knows when the next meteor / commet will strike or any form of Stella object will strike. hell could even be a black hole. WELL goodnight world, I'm off to sleep soundly knowing there is a chance we may not wake up tomorrow. :P WWWWWWWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee......
Hopfot 4 months ago
@Hopfot Yea, but think of how GARGANTUAN the universe is. What are the chances that anything like that would even come near us?
XxStonedKillerxX 4 months ago
@XxStonedKillerxX
*insert number of infinite size here*:1
However, a chance is always a chance. ;)
Hopfot 4 months ago
@bulletproof1098
relax man. the sun is at the mid point of its life cycle. It will last another 4 billion years or so, which which point humanity will have to move on to some place else, but there have already been discoveries of many earth like planets around other stars, so there will be plenty of places to go. So relax ... and get yourself a good engineering education in the meanwhile.
nightowl8936 5 months ago
@nightowl8936
Humans will be extinct long before then
Stet17 5 months ago
@nightowl8936 Yes, but those planets are lightyears away from us. Even if we could design a space craft of sorts, it would take centuries before we reach it.
XxStonedKillerxX 4 months ago
40,000,000 light years from earth. If you don't know light. That explosion is long gone if you were to be there this instant.
n8iveking17 6 months ago
Possibly a quasar
VenomAlexiz 6 months ago
@MegaChristaras. See what binge drinking since you were 14 has done to your brain
tubermier 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ULTIMATE SHOOOP DA WHOOP IMMA FIRIN MAH LAAAAAAAAAAAZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOR O o /¯____________________________ ______________ | BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH! !!!! \_¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ O o /¯____________________________ ______________ | BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH! !!!! \_¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ O o /¯____________________________ ______________ | BLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHH! !!!! \_¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
diegonikki 6 months ago
guys u dont get it , big bang is not so raelistic . The ends of our ''known'' universe is moving with the speed of light , also the light from that point moves of course with the light speed , now do a simple math and u will find that the '' movement '' is 0 . this means that because we cannot ''see'' the rest of the universe it doesnt mean it doesnt exist . thats a theory .
MegaChristaras 6 months ago
@MegaChristaras From what I have learned the light moves at the same speed for every observer so it cannot be 0 its speed is the same from whatever it is coming from that's special relativity and the movement of the universe cannot be equal to the speed of light because only light travels at the speed of light, so the light is traveling towards us at the speed of light, it might however, never reached us yet. Although i cant be so sure someone who's actually a scientist please enlighten me :)
Exmortus100 6 months ago
@Exmortus100 no the light's speed is not zero. the total movement is zero . since the universe is moving backwords and the light forward it equals 0 .and of course everything is about the relativity . ex . we see 100 miles and after thats its dark . lets say that spot ., the 100 miles , equals 0 for the observer there . he can see something for 100 miles and so on . i will pm u cause im out of words
MegaChristaras 6 months ago
@Exmortus100 kai nai . t dn mporeis n ktlbs re s .t sumpan dn kinite . epektinete . emeis eimaste sto simio A kai mporume na doume to astro X sto simeio +B . mexri ekei . meta terma . apo t shmeio +B sto astro X o allos mporei na dei t shmeio ++B kai to astro V . fantasou mia sfera . me diametro 100 . esu eisai sto kentro egw stn akri . mporeis na deis 100 to idio k egw 100 mazi exoume 200 .
MegaChristaras 6 months ago
That means that the star ended up collapsing in on itself and becoming a black hole......
WM1019 6 months ago
not true...its was one of Gods farts
jumpybinhead 7 months ago
oh cool! one of the first billion stars to form I guess
HeavyDemir 7 months ago
who put daffy duck on?
rafpac6 7 months ago
Goku's fighting Frieza again ;)
Fishlips5000 7 months ago 113
@Fishlips5000 lol :)
MyDelldelldell 2 months ago
The universe is one big mother fucker. We can't even see a minute fraction of it because of a limited visual technology. Galileo would be shitting bricks if he could see as far and well as we can today. Just imagine how far and clear we will be able to see in another 500 years. We'll probably be able to see an alien scratching his ass in another galaxy up close.
TheGreatSeraphim 7 months ago 2
@iclb00285 Sorry I was rude...No Worries
a1cswiz1611 7 months ago
@iclb00285 Just FYI..My comment was directed to ChristAmbassador1 (ChAm1). Harold is ChAm1's role model, not mine. As you can see from my comment, I copied and pasted ChAm1's post, which is the post he puts every where, and changed "God" to "Harold" and then replied it back to him. So your comment should not be directed to me but to him. So read the entire comment discussion and understand youtube's comment structure before you say anything. I am not a campingite, nor shall I ever be.
a1cswiz1611 7 months ago
@a1cswiz1611 what is campingite?
silasoldo7 6 months ago
@silasoldo7 A Campingite is someone who is a follower of Harold Camping
a1cswiz1611 6 months ago
Awesome video! Thanks for posting!
mushroomagical 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Salvation is over! Never was man's decision! Judgment day has begun! The Lamb of Wrath is coming!
wwwhearoearth.blogspotCom
ChristAmbassador1 8 months ago
I wouldnt trust this information coming from the voice of a chola.
DXBass46 8 months ago
That most be very far for the mighty gamma ray burst to be nothing more then a few pixels....
Usually it would be enough to wipe out all life on earth.
Dasmaster1 8 months ago
How did we get so lucky as to have that thing aimed at us over that great a distance. Sounds like alien intelligence to me! 8^o
Caleb6543 8 months ago
@Caleb6543 It's a matter of probability. There are million of other sources like that one that don't point in our direction
supergiuovane 8 months ago
A day i will go there…
bushibushi90 8 months ago
640 million years after the big bang? lol
TheDairyMan420 8 months ago
stp looking for what is never gonna be disecover u fools. , on your knees now and worship the creator all mighty God
mastki2000 9 months ago
@mastki2000 God aint real you fucking Bible bashing bitch
aGxpredator 9 months ago
@aGxpredator Can you prove that..
TheAndysaurus 9 months ago
@TheAndysaurus no i cant , but atleast you can see science instead of worshiping a invisible man
but my question is -
can you prove god exsists? and dont say the fucking bible because the bible is a bunch of fucking bullshit
if god is real he can suck my fucking dick
aGxpredator 9 months ago
@aGxpredator youre right,,, and the question of god existance is also the answear!!! to have an existance you have tou be created by something and on and on,,,so god have to be born somehow,,by peoaple who are born,by other,,etch,,so its just dont have sens
rckrackedup 8 months ago
@aGxpredatorthe answear is in the question,,,a living composition,,like animals or human for exemple,,need to be made the same way than everyone here have been made,,so dont tell me god apear like thats and start to do wath he wanted,,,it fucking imposib ,,and believing to this just demonstrate a blockage and a emptiness of the consciousness of the '''believing"" peoaple on our planet,,im not making a war,,out of thats,,because im ruled by the goodsens and my consciousness of my surrounding!!!
rckrackedup 8 months ago
@rckrackedup ermmm what ? i will answer you question when i can read it and u can actually spell
aGxpredator 8 months ago
@aGxpredator i dont need answear i already got mine,,too bad if you cant understand,,and by the way im not using anglish as first language,,so stop to be arogant and start dev eloping your brain fonctionality.
rckrackedup 7 months ago
@aGxpredator i dont need answear i already got mine,,too bad if you cant understand,,and by the way im not using anglish as first language,,so stop to be arogant and start dev eloping your brain fonctionality.wich iyou seem to do very well.
rckrackedup 7 months ago
@rckrackedup you shouldn´t type when you are angry.
silasoldo7 6 months ago
@aGxpredator good one lol
silasoldo7 6 months ago
@TheAndysaurus yeah i thought you wouldn't reply bitch go suck the popes dick
aGxpredator 8 months ago
At 13 billion lightyears the only thing you would be able to see is a galaxy.
Not individual stars
ferrarimike23 9 months ago
@ferrarimike23
That's a supernova, some of those can get (albiet for a very short time span from an astronomical standpoint) more luminous than the entire galaxy they occur in or even several times brighter if viewed from the right angle. Look up type 1a supernova, those were the extremely distant objects which contributed to the theory that the universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.
MichaelCox 9 months ago
@MichaelCox thank you for sharing the info.
silasoldo7 6 months ago
Damn you Vader!
bigrick170794 9 months ago
fuck dragon ball references, this is animated video of god burstin nurtz!!
187SicknesS 9 months ago
Wow. This is the first animation ever of a supernova producing a cyclotron beam. (I think) Usually they're shown as just massive exploding balls of fireworks.
TheRonMorales 9 months ago
O o
/¯____________________________ ______________
I'MA FIRIN' MA' LAZOR! BlAAAAAAAAAHHHHHH!!!!!!!!
\_¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ ¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯
adame5176 9 months ago 113
@adame5176 that is aaaaaw some
145thedon 8 months ago
@adame5176 More like a dick..
ROBOTBOY7499 4 months ago
This lady dont know anythin, its just......GALICK GUN!!!!!
EXPL0DINGPIE 9 months ago
DOCTOROCTAGONAPUS!!!
speedenforcer918 9 months ago
i dont think so, the most distant object in the universe is me in math class :O
couchboy10186 9 months ago 3
vegetas final flash
Grego1991 10 months ago
13.1 billion light years....
...My mind has been blown
kipsasXP4EVA 10 months ago 2
btw_i_sìgnêd_ûp_at_fûll_tìlt_pökër
_usìng_rêférräl_códè:_yOu600_äñd_got_â_600_døllar_bòñùs
eloisecasey12500 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nothing Else Matters except Jesus Christ the only True Wise Eternal God of all Creation. To Him be all Power. Majesty, Honor, and Glory forever and ever. He and He alone has declared the END from the Beginning.May 21, 2011 And now in these last days He is saving a great multitude more than any man can number whom He has chosen before time began(EPH 1:4) Then,He will destroy all those wicked who continually reject His Word with everlasting destruction(2Thes 1:9)wwwWeCanKnowCOM;EBiblefellowshipCom
ChristAmbassador1 10 months ago
@ChristAmbassador1 I'll tell you what. on May 22, 2011 (my sister's birthday), why don't you come over for the party. I've also got another bash scheduled on December 22, 2012 (my birthday). Same invite.
cabbievonbump 10 months ago
@ChristAmbassador1 Are you going to apologise to all the people you've been misleading?
bluecode320 8 months ago
@ChristAmbassador1
Nothing Else Matters except Harold Camping the only True Wise Eternal Man of all Creation. To Harold be all Power. Majesty, Honor, and Glory forever and ever. Harold and He alone has declared the END from the Beginning.May 21, 2011 And now in these last days Harold is saving a great multitude more than any man can number whom Harold has chosen before time began Then,Harold will destroy all those wicked who continually reject Harold's Word with everlasting destruction.
a1cswiz1611 8 months ago
@a1cswiz1611 Who's Harold?
ThisDude564 7 months ago
@ThisDude564 Just google or wikipedia Harold Camping and that should tell you everything you need to know about the false prophet liar....
a1cswiz1611 7 months ago
Final Flash!!!
kevinzhang9112 11 months ago
at 0:20 I can see starts behind it, obviously not the furthest.. :P
CodCats 11 months ago 3
SHE SOUNDS LIKE THE LIZARD GUY IN STAR TREK...GROK?
IF HE COULD TALK THAT IS...
neilzep 11 months ago
XD dont people love to debate space... because no one can have any prof. visa versa.
it's called the big bang THEORY!....people talk shit. rofl.
0o7125 11 months ago
thats vagetas galic-gun
90addition 11 months ago 3
Why would you hire or talk yourself on a video if you have a lisp?
DjLockard 11 months ago 3
@0glenbenton0 Even if the universe spreads or not, what is beneath and beyond its limits??? And what was there before the creation of the world?? Nothingness?? Give me the definition of nothingness??? Can anybody answer this questions??
PattyDLuffy 11 months ago
@PattyDLuffy Those questions have been addressed by philosophers (not very good answers here) and now, more accurately, physicists from all around the world for thousands of years. There is no definite answer yet. Many would agree "nothingness" and other "not perceivable from a rational perspective" concepts are undefinable by nature. If you really want to know you´ll have to wait or join the most brilliant minds alive in the search of the "ultimate answers"...good luck with that though.
Computerdisplay 11 months ago
KAMEHAMEHA!!!!!!!!!!!!
antiscreammer4ever 11 months ago
so basically its a ray of light that is traveling at the satellite but is so far away that even at the speed of light, you can still see it coming, space is amazing!
firemaiden34 11 months ago
thats the explosion of the death star
PrankWhores 1 year ago
First of all there was no BIG BANG if you want to know why ask i have really good reasons why
THEN SECOND OF ALL
the galaxy NEVER ends it will never end think about it after something ends wats after that SOOOOO something had to be after that so that was just another random star
Dannyekimyan 1 year ago
@Dannyekimyan
Ok, Why. Whats your good reasons?
And also, you said the galaxy NEVER ends. I'm assuming you meant "universe" not galaxy, so let me ask why you say the universe never ends? if you really did mean galaxy then your in a world of your own, but im assuming it was a typo.
0GlenBenton0 11 months ago
@0GlenBenton0 Yes i meant Universe because how could it end just take a minute and think say the universe ends whats after that? something else right? and the big boom could not have happened because think about that to have you ever seen any type of an explosion create something.
And how the hell would a explosion make atoms colors gravity use
( Only someone who loves can make something that loves)
Dannyekimyan 11 months ago
@Dannyekimyan
Just because your mind cannot comprehend it, doesn't mean that you are right or wrong. It is unknowable, so why bother trying to debate it?
And also, how much do you know about the current big bang theory, and who taught you it? Was it your pastor? I'm not saying it is right, as it is not a stable theory, but pretty much everything you think you know about it is wrong. Try actually researching something before you spout nonsense all over YouTube.
0GlenBenton0 11 months ago
@0GlenBenton0 Tell me one explosion that created everything NOt one. And no i did research and i stay on my theory that nothing exempt God could make this im not saying im one of those people who are always talking about god but really think about it a big boom created everything the universe never ends that means the big boom had to never end and is still going and if that was true then that would send energy waves back which would harm our solar system that honestly could be a jock a big boom
Dannyekimyan 11 months ago
@Dannyekimyan
I smell a troll... but your channel makes me think you are serious. Your obviously a kid, and you should probably leave debating to the grown ups, or at least ask someone to teach you the big bang theory. Its not called the 'big boom'. Its the Big Bang. And it was not an explosion, it was an expansion of space. Space is not flat, it is a sphere. You clearly have not researched it, otherwise you would not attacking a completely different theory which nobody on earth believes in.
0GlenBenton0 11 months ago
@0GlenBenton0 Too lazy to check up on the stuff Danny ranted about, but I have to say,
I don't believe in the Big Bang theory myself
I don't think humans know, nor should find out how anything is or was created
We've already got a massive God complex (yes, we do) and like with most things
If we can't be sure about something in the past, we'll just claim it to be
We can only assume it happened like the theory, but for all we know some 5D Easterrabbit crapped a 6D egg which became our 3D universe.
Hyroile 9 months ago
@Hyroile There are a few things that support the Big Bang. The Comic Microwave Background Radiation, the entirely uniform Electromagnetic Pulse that NASA discovered, the fact our universe has been proven to be expanding. Scientific theories have tangible data to support them, to many people misinterpret the term "theory" in the scientific context as being the same as just an idea. Not the same.
If you believe in God, don't you think he made us with minds to question things?
HighCardWins 9 months ago
@HighCardWins "Scientific theories have tangible data to support them," hey a scientific theory is just that a theory and may or may not be true, a hypothesis is true untill proven false
UberEliteDemonGodKid 9 months ago
@UberEliteDemonGodKid Uh no.
HighCardWins 8 months ago
@Hyroile Massive god complex? lol. Explain please
RightHookJoker 8 months ago
@Dannyekimyan O yea because your channel is much better my brother made those rome total war videos and your not very smart if you don't know someone and judge him you don't know me and you make decisions about me your much smarter then me ( wink)
people didn't even step on the moon and are talking about how the universe was mad pathetic they cant see farther then there noises
Dannyekimyan 11 months ago
@Dannyekimyan my god... wat freking world r u from ur so rude and cruel
WallEandEveRock 11 months ago
@WallEandEveRock You dont know anything so please dont judge you dont know where and what i saw so just dont think of your self like you know something
Dannyekimyan 11 months ago
@Dannyekimyan im nt judeing im telling the TRUTH not every one believes ur opinoins ur just conceded
WallEandEveRock 11 months ago
@Dannyekimyan eh,,,
You´re talking about smart?
Duuude, please, don't..
2 reasons..
Check your comment for grammar.
Check who you replied the comment to. You're welcome.
Hyroile 9 months ago