First play Brahms-Paganini in public without doing any mistakes. Then you can judge. Just playing on a stage deserves the highest respect, and if you are going to play one of the most hard piano pieces that exists... It's very easy to judge from the stalls. I don't even mention the fact that each pianist is an unique world, so any comparison among them has no sense (vox Arthur Rubinstein).
First play Brahms-Paganini in public without doing any mistakes. Then you can judge. Just playing on a stage deserves the highest respect, and if you are going to play one of the most hard piano pieces that exists... It's very easy to judge from the stalls. I don't even mention the fact that each pianist is an unique world, so any comparison among them has no sense (vox Arthur Rubinstein).
extroverted work, extreme shining music, Brahms wrote a great piece of art with these variations from Paganini´s 24th capriccio, wonderful Gilels, one of the top pianist of the 20th century
@kurapicaasakura I think Arrau was not only a great man but also a Genius, an incredible virtuoso and a very "profondo" Pianist. All my admiration for this great Musician. P.S.: his playing of B-P is as outstanding as Katchen rendition.
If you want to do the glizzes, practice on something light, like an electric keyboard, then progress to an upright then a grand. I can only stretch an octave and, being a girl, am not terrifically strong. I was surprised, however, that after a week or so of agony/blisters/numb 5th finger work, I could do it!
Don't listen to etude12 archcorenth, you need a good organ to get xtra smooth and fair glissando, a modern e keyboard with a good organ sound will help, though yu will miss the pedals, also helps with understanding orchestral effects in the composition elements. "
I was addressing the building of strength, leading to the development of an octave gliss. on a piano. Like lifting weights from a low to a high wieght, building resistance. The use of an organ is equally legitimate.
the suggestions u got dont say the essential. in the glissando the thumb and the pinky are positioned and bent in a DIFFERENT way, otherwise of course one bleeds to death. the thumb hit the keyboard with nail and it's totally bent, while the pinky stays STRAIGHT and touches with the soft part.
I thought that was too obvious to explain. It may have seemed patronising. Sort of like making someone re-learn the alphabet because they mis-spelled a word. Glad you contrubuted though, in case the execution of a gliss. was not clear.
One of the most gracious pianists of all time. He is amazing... I really wish the younger generation could bring this kind of mesmerizing playing to the concert platform.
Usualmente los criticos profesionales (que se ganan la vida sacando imperfecciones ,"teclazos", "tiempos lentos o rapidos" y cuanto error comete un ser humano (un pianista no esta exento de hacerlo) son ilustres desconocidos.A la historia pasan los grandes interpretes que recrean (aun con imperfeccion) las grandes obras maestras. Y dichosamente son humanos y se equivocan,pues de otra manera ya habriamos inventado robots- artistas y aun asi, los criticos les encontrarian errores...
A wonderful piece, and one of the hardest of all to play; yet this piece has nothing ostentatious, showy or flashy, every variation is great music. Who could be better qualified to play it than Gilels? (nobody!)
pianocommy, Everybody does qualify to play this piece who can play it from the beginning to the end without hitting wrong notes.. This would not necesssary result in a great performance as this one but would do for the management..
I didn't mean to imply that other pianists are unqualified to play this piece (I've had a go myself); but that in my opinion, Gilels is the ideal pianist to play it.
I love Gilels as a pianist tho. I encourage you to hear the Kissin for its extreme balls to the wall tour de force display of wicked virtuosity... its pretty unbelievable
I don't think that playing it technically better than Gilels does here is much of a challenge for any virtuoso: he's clearly in a rather weak form, at 67 and after a heart attack his technique is not what it used to be 20-30 years earlier. musically, however, Kissin doesn't amount to much compared to him, or other masters of this caliber
Gilels is without doubt my favourite pianist. I know that because he is the only one whose playing can make me cry. Why is that? It certainly has to do with his very great artistry (as opposed to technique), his choice of repertoire, which is central to my musical tastes.
But, I think the extra, deciding factor is that Gilels' absolute integrity before the music, complete lack of ego and very great warmth and humanity set him apart from most other executant artists.
Wonderful;not just a"technical"rending but one which has grasp of sense of direction & placing the important dramatic & poetic moments.I heard him in both books about this year(RFH London)where all the accidents happened in the theme(!),and having got those out of the way,he gave an impressively commanding performance.Always great musical events,his concerts.
Gilels was one of the all-time greats. I saw him play both the Schumann (which I also played in public) and the Grieg. They were flawless, and yet, I was astouded to read in his obituary that he was a pianist noted for making mistakes. That's news to me!!!
In ogni caso, Gilels è stato un interprete e un virtuoso immenso, e concordo con chi asserisce che negli ultimi anni della sua vita il suo suono si è andato perfezionando raggiungendo una qualità e una bellezza sublimi, inimitabili (ascoltare, ad esempio, la sua registrazione dei pezzi lirici di Grieg...da sogno...).
Paragonata alla registrazione in studio di Katchen, è inferiore (musicalmente e tecnicamente). Ma questa è dal vivo e Gilels non è più un "giovanotto"...ed è comunque molto bella...
pianopera: I agree - Gilels was a wonderful Brahmsian :) Bear in mind this performance here was in 1984 - only a year before he died. He had a heart attack in 1981 (after playing the Schumann concerto at the Concertgebouw), and his health suffered after that. It really says something that despite his declining health he still had the stamina to take on the Brahms-Paganini in his final recitals. I read that Richter said Gilels had "devoured" the Brahms-Paganini in his youth during the war.
Yes, if I'm not mistaken Gilels won the Queen Elisabeth competetion in 1938 (A.B. Michelangeli finishing only at the 7th place in the same year) and especially his rendering of this piece must have been sensational...(and 46 years later it's still not too bad!)
This recording is from his recital at Tchaikovsky Hall in Mosocw on January 9, 1983. In spite of some losses - very inspiring performance!!! Gilels as always.
Wonderful post! Thank you for sharing!
bcfiddle 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
First play Brahms-Paganini in public without doing any mistakes. Then you can judge. Just playing on a stage deserves the highest respect, and if you are going to play one of the most hard piano pieces that exists... It's very easy to judge from the stalls. I don't even mention the fact that each pianist is an unique world, so any comparison among them has no sense (vox Arthur Rubinstein).
packardbell2 11 months ago
First play Brahms-Paganini in public without doing any mistakes. Then you can judge. Just playing on a stage deserves the highest respect, and if you are going to play one of the most hard piano pieces that exists... It's very easy to judge from the stalls. I don't even mention the fact that each pianist is an unique world, so any comparison among them has no sense (vox Arthur Rubinstein).
packardbell2 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Plenty of mistakes. But to hell with them. What a magnificent rendition. A suberb artist!
NormanicusDiabolicus 1 year ago
Plent of mistakes. But to hell with them. What a magnificent rendition. A suberb artist!
NormanicusDiabolicus 1 year ago 3
buana sona ta sin duda
no entiendo nada de lo que dicen esta en ingleees T.T
diegokillua 1 year ago
1:32, probably makes the entire set for me.
KeithWhalen11 1 year ago
extroverted work, extreme shining music, Brahms wrote a great piece of art with these variations from Paganini´s 24th capriccio, wonderful Gilels, one of the top pianist of the 20th century
beethomozart 1 year ago
Katchen...!! No human can do better in Brahms Paganini...!!
dido93 1 year ago
@dido93 yes, katchen's is by far the best
Sim882 1 year ago
@dido93 Arrau could, and he did it. Hear variations 13 and 14 played by Arrau
kurapicaasakura 1 year ago
@kurapicaasakura I think Arrau was not only a great man but also a Genius, an incredible virtuoso and a very "profondo" Pianist. All my admiration for this great Musician. P.S.: his playing of B-P is as outstanding as Katchen rendition.
dido93 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Not as good as Arrau.
eppilihpsiuppahc 2 years ago
sehr schöne sympathische Aufnahme aber nicht so zwingend wie Wilhelm Backhaus 1930 erhältlich bei Naxos
drrichardhauser 2 years ago
the best of the world
chaos4u2 2 years ago
Fahtastique!
Messiaen28 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
kempff95 2 years ago
he plays it even better than Michelangeli.
suremate 2 years ago
he makes the octave glizzes look so easy.. (^_^)
UGTownsend 2 years ago
Won't they hurt his fingers,,how do you them without using the nail?
mehandas 2 years ago
You have to use the thumbnail and your pinky to perform an octave glissando.
reaperman2004 2 years ago
I'm not strong enough for that. :-P
archcorenth 2 years ago
archcorenth,
If you want to do the glizzes, practice on something light, like an electric keyboard, then progress to an upright then a grand. I can only stretch an octave and, being a girl, am not terrifically strong. I was surprised, however, that after a week or so of agony/blisters/numb 5th finger work, I could do it!
etude12 2 years ago
Don't listen to etude12 archcorenth, you need a good organ to get xtra smooth and fair glissando, a modern e keyboard with a good organ sound will help, though yu will miss the pedals, also helps with understanding orchestral effects in the composition elements. "
Overlapse1000 2 years ago
I was addressing the building of strength, leading to the development of an octave gliss. on a piano. Like lifting weights from a low to a high wieght, building resistance. The use of an organ is equally legitimate.
etude12 2 years ago
the suggestions u got dont say the essential. in the glissando the thumb and the pinky are positioned and bent in a DIFFERENT way, otherwise of course one bleeds to death. the thumb hit the keyboard with nail and it's totally bent, while the pinky stays STRAIGHT and touches with the soft part.
pianofolle 2 years ago
I thought that was too obvious to explain. It may have seemed patronising. Sort of like making someone re-learn the alphabet because they mis-spelled a word. Glad you contrubuted though, in case the execution of a gliss. was not clear.
etude12 2 years ago
it's ok, i was more precise coz i remember myself in the beginnig: i was placing my hand and fingers in the most absurd ways!
pianofolle 2 years ago
forgot to say: the wrist /hand is inclined opposite way to the glissando movement! so the pinky will be inclined ab 45 degrees respect to each key
pianofolle 2 years ago
why he sits like that??....
TK2008BEST 2 years ago
One of the most gracious pianists of all time. He is amazing... I really wish the younger generation could bring this kind of mesmerizing playing to the concert platform.
marypoppins87 3 years ago 3
Everyone who's anyone wants to be Paganini. Brahms, Rach, Liszt......
CodyNelsonMusic 3 years ago
Usualmente los criticos profesionales (que se ganan la vida sacando imperfecciones ,"teclazos", "tiempos lentos o rapidos" y cuanto error comete un ser humano (un pianista no esta exento de hacerlo) son ilustres desconocidos.A la historia pasan los grandes interpretes que recrean (aun con imperfeccion) las grandes obras maestras. Y dichosamente son humanos y se equivocan,pues de otra manera ya habriamos inventado robots- artistas y aun asi, los criticos les encontrarian errores...
JorPove 3 years ago
great music great performance great snacks
rynah123 3 years ago
A wonderful piece, and one of the hardest of all to play; yet this piece has nothing ostentatious, showy or flashy, every variation is great music. Who could be better qualified to play it than Gilels? (nobody!)
pianocommy 3 years ago
pianocommy, Everybody does qualify to play this piece who can play it from the beginning to the end without hitting wrong notes.. This would not necesssary result in a great performance as this one but would do for the management..
dgaranin 3 years ago
I didn't mean to imply that other pianists are unqualified to play this piece (I've had a go myself); but that in my opinion, Gilels is the ideal pianist to play it.
pianocommy 3 years ago
Comment removed
mikejr41387 2 years ago
That fascinating Mike - however people are entitled to their opinions.
However... I haven't heard Kissin play it... so right now I can't judge.
However Mei-ting Sing plays it pretty damn well and with plenty of gusto and energy.
reaperman2004 2 years ago
I love Gilels as a pianist tho. I encourage you to hear the Kissin for its extreme balls to the wall tour de force display of wicked virtuosity... its pretty unbelievable
mikejr41387 2 years ago
amen! Kissin shreds through both books with superior technique that is second to none!
PianoStudent7 2 years ago
I don't think that playing it technically better than Gilels does here is much of a challenge for any virtuoso: he's clearly in a rather weak form, at 67 and after a heart attack his technique is not what it used to be 20-30 years earlier. musically, however, Kissin doesn't amount to much compared to him, or other masters of this caliber
punkpoetry 2 years ago 15
thats basically all i was trying to say. Kissin is obviously no match for Gilels as an artist
mikejr41387 2 years ago 3
@punkpoetry And this is a live performance, different from Kissin.
olivleonardo 8 months ago
Gilels is without doubt my favourite pianist. I know that because he is the only one whose playing can make me cry. Why is that? It certainly has to do with his very great artistry (as opposed to technique), his choice of repertoire, which is central to my musical tastes.
But, I think the extra, deciding factor is that Gilels' absolute integrity before the music, complete lack of ego and very great warmth and humanity set him apart from most other executant artists.
I am forever greatful.
exponentu 3 years ago 25
ditto what you said re integrity re the music.
he's plainly in great pain here, yet perseveres.
one of the 20th centurys greatest imho.
a friend of mine who grew up in the soviet union said they considered richter and gilels the great pianists of their day.
seems they got something right, anyway.
slothvader 3 years ago
Wonderful;not just a"technical"rending but one which has grasp of sense of direction & placing the important dramatic & poetic moments.I heard him in both books about this year(RFH London)where all the accidents happened in the theme(!),and having got those out of the way,he gave an impressively commanding performance.Always great musical events,his concerts.
NOSEhow2LIV 3 years ago 2
Gilels was one of the all-time greats. I saw him play both the Schumann (which I also played in public) and the Grieg. They were flawless, and yet, I was astouded to read in his obituary that he was a pianist noted for making mistakes. That's news to me!!!
selfpraisepomp 3 years ago 5
he played slower than arrau,but wonderful
hyf199003 3 years ago
the speed is not the indicator, guys! Why do you all judge by the speed? Strange.
pianotalent 3 years ago 3
Thanks for posting this video! I didn't know it existed.
sbcpianist 3 years ago
his arm gestures at the end of passages are classic
englishplayer40 3 years ago
Paganini would kiss not only his hands, as by Berlioz, but feet too...
Geistero 3 years ago
mori l'anno dopo questo concerto credo
goldberg72 3 years ago
how the bloody hell does he do that octave glisando at 4:00?! anyway, he is one of my favoite pianists.
beryllium2 4 years ago 2
he was a genious!
mathpianist93 3 years ago
In ogni caso, Gilels è stato un interprete e un virtuoso immenso, e concordo con chi asserisce che negli ultimi anni della sua vita il suo suono si è andato perfezionando raggiungendo una qualità e una bellezza sublimi, inimitabili (ascoltare, ad esempio, la sua registrazione dei pezzi lirici di Grieg...da sogno...).
dido93 4 years ago 2
Paragonata alla registrazione in studio di Katchen, è inferiore (musicalmente e tecnicamente). Ma questa è dal vivo e Gilels non è più un "giovanotto"...ed è comunque molto bella...
dido93 4 years ago
I think he has such a gorgeous tone in his later years
chad410 4 years ago 5
pianopera: I agree - Gilels was a wonderful Brahmsian :) Bear in mind this performance here was in 1984 - only a year before he died. He had a heart attack in 1981 (after playing the Schumann concerto at the Concertgebouw), and his health suffered after that. It really says something that despite his declining health he still had the stamina to take on the Brahms-Paganini in his final recitals. I read that Richter said Gilels had "devoured" the Brahms-Paganini in his youth during the war.
Elfinsafety 4 years ago 4
Yes, if I'm not mistaken Gilels won the Queen Elisabeth competetion in 1938 (A.B. Michelangeli finishing only at the 7th place in the same year) and especially his rendering of this piece must have been sensational...(and 46 years later it's still not too bad!)
pianopera 4 years ago 2
Yeah it must have been mind-blowing :)
From Rubinstein's autobiography (he was on the jury):
"Emil Gilels played both volumes of the Brahms-Paganini variations in a way which left no doubt that he was the outstanding competitor"
I wonder if he played Book 2 after this Book 1 performance here?
Elfinsafety 4 years ago
This recording is from his recital at Tchaikovsky Hall in Mosocw on January 9, 1983. In spite of some losses - very inspiring performance!!! Gilels as always.
robshelrobshel 4 years ago
wonderful
sviatoslavberezovsky 4 years ago 2
Maybe not Gilels in his best form - but still a wonderful performance with intelligent phrasing, depth, warmth and sincere musicianship.
pianopera 4 years ago 5
Even if this is not "Gilels in his best form", It's the best Brahms-Pag I know of!
pianocommy 2 years ago