Logically thinking person? Like St. Thomas Aquinas, perhaps? Or would you like to explain in greater depth the logic behind your masterful syllogism, "It sounds made up, therefore it is"?
How much of Physics sounds like bad science fiction? Yet it turns up as true.
Oh dear! I don't know why so many people rated my earlier comment negatively. There was nothing contentious in it. It was simply a statement of fact. The taperer on the south side is me. This is the 2004 reconstruction that we did. I was also the subdeacon at the 2008 reconstruction in Norwich. At one time, John had suggested that I be asked to be celebrant, and Allan was toying with the idea himself before he was ordained. These reconstructions are not intended as real masses. They are done...
...in part for academic purposes, and so that people can learn something of the Christian liturgical heritage of Britain, whether for academic or for devotional purposes, and partly because it's fun. It's useful to have an ordained person as celebrant because such a person is usually more acquainted than most with how to behave at an altar but beyond that there's no other reason why the celebrants so far have all been Anglican clergy.
It is doubtful that this polyphony would have been sung in such a small parish church in York. A genuine (Catholic) Mass according to the Use of York should be celebrated in Ampleforth Abbey - with permission being sought from the Catholic Ordinary and the Holy Father. The Minster would be the ideal location, but the altar would have to be reconsecrated or a mensa brought in.
Perhaps the next time it's 'performed' boys and male altos should replace the women.
You're likely right about the music. The most recent one was probably more authentic in that there were simply two clerks singing the propers and ordinary. I'm surprised nobody has commented on the authenticity of the taperers. One is black (me) and the other is female. I doubt that would have been authentic in 15th century York. Still, it was good fun.
Yes, to my mind it was a proper act of worship. One that hadn't been offered for many centuries, therefore required reconstructing both textually and visually.
Quam dilecta tabernacula tua, Domine! / How lovely are thy tabernacles, Lord!
At 71, I have grown weary of my RC Church where so much has been changed that people of my age have few shared words left with which to discuss our experience of faith with young Catholics.
This 'reproduction' is so wonderful, so reassuring.
I have never heard the melody before, but it seems so ever old, so ever new
All i can say is, God bless the C of E 'Gild of Clerks' for keeping such treasures alive!
Thank you for your kind words. At 32 I too have become weary of the lack of timelessness and continuity in the liturgy. The liturgy of ages speaks to all generations, I think. As for the music, this was the first time it had been performed since before the English Reformation.
@TrainmasterCurt : I agree, although I miss the low reredos or riddel curtains that fit well with the low east window. I understand that All Saints once had these, but removed 'em.
It isn't intended to be 100% accurate, but was intended to give a 'feel' of late medieval liturgy. If we had been entirely authentic it would have been necessary to rip up the fitted carpet and restore the medieval levels at the east end of the chancel.
This mass is indeed the Roman Rite, according to the Use of York, but the church is CofE and is Anglo-Catholic, which is in communion with the See of Canterbury
No. It was only an academic reconstruction and not intended as an actual offering of the mass. There was even talk of having a layman do it at one point.
Logically thinking person? Like St. Thomas Aquinas, perhaps? Or would you like to explain in greater depth the logic behind your masterful syllogism, "It sounds made up, therefore it is"?
How much of Physics sounds like bad science fiction? Yet it turns up as true.
NihilNominis 1 year ago
Do you have anything intelligent to say while you are here? Come on, surely you can do better than simply debunking Christianity as myth.
Vitrearum 2 years ago
Oh dear! I don't know why so many people rated my earlier comment negatively. There was nothing contentious in it. It was simply a statement of fact. The taperer on the south side is me. This is the 2004 reconstruction that we did. I was also the subdeacon at the 2008 reconstruction in Norwich. At one time, John had suggested that I be asked to be celebrant, and Allan was toying with the idea himself before he was ordained. These reconstructions are not intended as real masses. They are done...
FraterCyprianus 2 years ago
...in part for academic purposes, and so that people can learn something of the Christian liturgical heritage of Britain, whether for academic or for devotional purposes, and partly because it's fun. It's useful to have an ordained person as celebrant because such a person is usually more acquainted than most with how to behave at an altar but beyond that there's no other reason why the celebrants so far have all been Anglican clergy.
FraterCyprianus 2 years ago
It is doubtful that this polyphony would have been sung in such a small parish church in York. A genuine (Catholic) Mass according to the Use of York should be celebrated in Ampleforth Abbey - with permission being sought from the Catholic Ordinary and the Holy Father. The Minster would be the ideal location, but the altar would have to be reconsecrated or a mensa brought in.
Perhaps the next time it's 'performed' boys and male altos should replace the women.
allwasforanapple 2 years ago
You're likely right about the music. The most recent one was probably more authentic in that there were simply two clerks singing the propers and ordinary. I'm surprised nobody has commented on the authenticity of the taperers. One is black (me) and the other is female. I doubt that would have been authentic in 15th century York. Still, it was good fun.
FraterCyprianus 2 years ago
beautiful, but was this Church of England or Catholic under Anglican use?
Winaska 2 years ago
Neither. It was a reconstruction by the Gild of Clerks, which is a non-denominational special interest group.
FraterCyprianus 2 years ago
oh so it wasnt even a real service?
Winaska 2 years ago
Yes, to my mind it was a proper act of worship. One that hadn't been offered for many centuries, therefore required reconstructing both textually and visually.
Vitrearum 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Quam dilecta tabernacula tua, Domine! / How lovely are thy tabernacles, Lord!
At 71, I have grown weary of my RC Church where so much has been changed that people of my age have few shared words left with which to discuss our experience of faith with young Catholics.
This 'reproduction' is so wonderful, so reassuring.
I have never heard the melody before, but it seems so ever old, so ever new
All i can say is, God bless the C of E 'Gild of Clerks' for keeping such treasures alive!
muisire 2 years ago
Thank you for your kind words. At 32 I too have become weary of the lack of timelessness and continuity in the liturgy. The liturgy of ages speaks to all generations, I think. As for the music, this was the first time it had been performed since before the English Reformation.
Vitrearum 2 years ago
Comment removed
muisire 2 years ago
Comment removed
muisire 2 years ago
I think the English Use Altar looks more dignified than the Baroque type, Percy Dearmer always reccommended them
TrainmasterCurt 2 years ago 4
@TrainmasterCurt : I agree, although I miss the low reredos or riddel curtains that fit well with the low east window. I understand that All Saints once had these, but removed 'em.
mudws 1 year ago
It isn't intended to be 100% accurate, but was intended to give a 'feel' of late medieval liturgy. If we had been entirely authentic it would have been necessary to rip up the fitted carpet and restore the medieval levels at the east end of the chancel.
Vitrearum 3 years ago
I don't understand entirely isn't there a prayer for thepope even in the york usage. How did you as Anglicans get around this?
juggles20007 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
TrainmasterCurt 3 years ago
Comment removed
TrainmasterCurt 3 years ago
This mass is indeed the Roman Rite, according to the Use of York, but the church is CofE and is Anglo-Catholic, which is in communion with the See of Canterbury
TrainmasterCurt 3 years ago
No, both the clergy and the church are part of the established church.
Vitrearum 3 years ago
Is this Mass in union with the Church of Rome?
Moneybags916 3 years ago
No. It was only an academic reconstruction and not intended as an actual offering of the mass. There was even talk of having a layman do it at one point.
FraterCyprianus 3 years ago