time and place for everything. American ads push sex sex sex. but make nudity taboo. I love looking at good looking young females. they should be able to wear what they want without having to worry about getting taken advantage of
It's his job to do that. He's trying to keep the beach safe & to make sure nobody has to see that. It's a federal law & he HAS to. I'm sure he's enjoying it as much as you or me. & If I had to walk up to such a woman & give them a fine, I'd do it so I can get closer...
Having worked in Law Enforcement, I can tell that the laws concerning "legal" bathing ware can very greatly from state to state and even city to city. Some Southern California beaches must have a greater portions of the buttocks and breasts covered. And why are they having a life guard debating whats legal(other than the simple fact that he has seen a lot of tits/girls in the bathing suits)?! Get a beach cop up there or a city councilman.
shock value overrides sexual attractivness/appealingness, because if it was more just on the sexual arousing aspect, then ass would be just as obscene as tits, but apparently it's not.
But then saying how the clit is obscene. The vagina is a sex organ anyways, whereas boobs are secondary sexual characteristics. And on top of that, in the sexual aspect, why is a naked ass more fine then naked tits? Call me crazy, but as a man, I've always know guys to be just as aroused and love ass as much as tits, hence T and A and not just T. So if we are going on that sexual basis, shouldn't ass exposure be indecent as well? Inconsistent if you ask me. Therefore, it seems like shock value
If they are actually trying to prevent staring or too much lust, then they would have a bikini that is just strings and the woman is 98% naked be indecent, because if going that far is fine even though the arousal and lust and staring it would cause from the 98% naked woman, I don't see how that extra bit is much more significant considerig what the just strings bikini the woman is wearing. I can understand for the vagina, but then again it's not like they are showing the vagina lips, but
This legality is kind of retarded when it's comes to millimeters. Isn't the reason they have the standard is because to not incite great lust. I'm sorry but most beaches, if a woman wore an x tape over her nipples and butt floss and showed as much as her pelvis as could be shown without her lips showing. Umm, dudes would be walking into each other, staring, gawking, like she was naked, even though she technically wasn't naked, because no nipple exposure or vagina exposure.
Amazing Sexy Panties at *Thong69* , COM
diialbz77379 2 years ago
time and place for everything. American ads push sex sex sex. but make nudity taboo. I love looking at good looking young females. they should be able to wear what they want without having to worry about getting taken advantage of
macchef01 2 years ago 2
in oklahoma you can cover your nipples with lipstick the same color as the nipple.
legal? yes
datzfast 2 years ago 5
ok wat if a girl wears like stickers over her nipples and some tight ass gstring
DatDuvalBoi 2 years ago 2
girls like this should be encouraged to wear this stuff, not discouraged, what has this world come to?
99arruru99 2 years ago 3
I want to do all these girls!!!!!
melovetorun 2 years ago 12
too bad youre 7 years old
bmprocket7 2 years ago 5
only a fag like him would give a fine to a naked girl...
xXdarxtarXx 2 years ago 6
It's his job to do that. He's trying to keep the beach safe & to make sure nobody has to see that. It's a federal law & he HAS to. I'm sure he's enjoying it as much as you or me. & If I had to walk up to such a woman & give them a fine, I'd do it so I can get closer...
Yrrej8611 2 years ago 2
still i wouldnt give them a fine
xXdarxtarXx 2 years ago
0:55 and 1:34 nice ass
XJokerX25 2 years ago
KANDY IS FINE!!!
XJokerX25 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Having worked in Law Enforcement, I can tell that the laws concerning "legal" bathing ware can very greatly from state to state and even city to city. Some Southern California beaches must have a greater portions of the buttocks and breasts covered. And why are they having a life guard debating whats legal(other than the simple fact that he has seen a lot of tits/girls in the bathing suits)?! Get a beach cop up there or a city councilman.
ValhallaOrBust85 2 years ago
Funny, an ex cop who can't spell "vary", or "wear". Thats great.
QUntouchable 2 years ago 2
biches hella banginnnnn
megaman7812 3 years ago
i love manswers
flamingbongs 3 years ago 5
nirpule, vurgina, and angus?
NarutoLPawesome 3 years ago 2
is he saying vurgina?
gilarenasfan94 3 years ago
if u pause at 1:28 then u can see a little bit of nipple
jrich32 3 years ago 12
i like Candy
1920al 3 years ago 4
i wonder if they really enjoy prancing around the stage like that
godzilla19892012 3 years ago
i like the blonde one
godzilla19892012 3 years ago
this show just makes me love girls even more...God bless you ladies out there!
117rebel 3 years ago 7
Love the way that lifeguard pronounces the word "vagina." Vergina.
jamesjohnking 3 years ago 4
nice
banjee2024 3 years ago
shock value overrides sexual attractivness/appealingness, because if it was more just on the sexual arousing aspect, then ass would be just as obscene as tits, but apparently it's not.
miamiman24 3 years ago
But then saying how the clit is obscene. The vagina is a sex organ anyways, whereas boobs are secondary sexual characteristics. And on top of that, in the sexual aspect, why is a naked ass more fine then naked tits? Call me crazy, but as a man, I've always know guys to be just as aroused and love ass as much as tits, hence T and A and not just T. So if we are going on that sexual basis, shouldn't ass exposure be indecent as well? Inconsistent if you ask me. Therefore, it seems like shock value
miamiman24 3 years ago
If they are actually trying to prevent staring or too much lust, then they would have a bikini that is just strings and the woman is 98% naked be indecent, because if going that far is fine even though the arousal and lust and staring it would cause from the 98% naked woman, I don't see how that extra bit is much more significant considerig what the just strings bikini the woman is wearing. I can understand for the vagina, but then again it's not like they are showing the vagina lips, but
miamiman24 3 years ago
This legality is kind of retarded when it's comes to millimeters. Isn't the reason they have the standard is because to not incite great lust. I'm sorry but most beaches, if a woman wore an x tape over her nipples and butt floss and showed as much as her pelvis as could be shown without her lips showing. Umm, dudes would be walking into each other, staring, gawking, like she was naked, even though she technically wasn't naked, because no nipple exposure or vagina exposure.
miamiman24 3 years ago
Anyone know exactly where this "Snooky's" club / bar / nightclub is located at ?
city, address....??
LookUpMomoZone 3 years ago
yay
bullshitproof 3 years ago
ma favorite show
JakeP073 3 years ago
ponies
rsryryownz 3 years ago
yay
JakeP073 3 years ago