Added: 3 years ago
From: matterik
Views: 834
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I'm the only one who wants a world government? Think about the possibilities of exploitation.

    "Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers

    and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt

    of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organized insurrection of

    sheep against the practice of eating mutton." (Bertrand Russell, "The Impact of Science on Society"; 1953).

  • the socialist systems in the east were created on purpose as an experiment, to be merged with the western forms of "democracy". a synthesis known as a "third way" aka one world totalitarianism

  • matterik, have you considered that the problems we face have not to do with a world syndicalism, but rather with the narrow and myopic scope of the powerful capitalist class? whom we have inherited from hisory. a cooeperative world system based on kibbutz model would be qualititively different to a corporate world state for instance(with profit as it's only concern) the problem is not to understand the world, but how to change it so that it is fit for sustainability and for human beings.

  • the syndicalists [are] the capitalist class and that 'class' is relatively small.i.e. bill gates is not one of them.any class,'model' or organization that was effective or will be is controlled by this 'class'.in fact in most cases they created it.'we' didnt inherit 'it'.'it' controls and defines 'history'.

  • the syndicated bourgeois are the corporations, The legislation and protection capital acquires. But they do not make history, they respond to balance sheets and are slaves to market forces over which they have no control. It is we the people who make history, Don't let a pimp tell you he built the street. All those chains are fake plated gold anyway. Profit is not wealth.

  • Syndicalism has two meanings, there is the syndicalism of capital, but also it can mean a union of peoples as a form of anarchist disaster.

    It is worth keeping in mind that the CIA has used syndicalist worker's movements to smash working class movements in Sth America. Anarchy is ultra leftist and infantile. It is the rainbow but before people discover their power. Power is not a man with a gun, it most importantly requires consciousness.

    It must be made from real social and economic progress.

  • You see, I have heard these arguments before in the dialogue between the left and anarchy.

    Anarchy uses different words for many of the same things, Anarchy is a peasant mindset beloved by bourgeois radicals who can dream of leading a revolution like che Guvara, It is insanity.

    Today industrial society is the medium of politics.The question must be about how to steer the ship and distribute, enrich, empower, not about how to sink it.

    The answer I see is people just taking it, no blood necessary.

  • revolution is a myriad of forms. We can grow and encourage the flowering of enlightenment and transformation anywhere and everywhere, we water the garden with ideas. The ideas are that we cooperate and work together. So simple and elegant that it can change the world We only have to contend with what there is, that is; self interest and humans trapped in history, slaves to conditions as are.

    Everywhere and anywhere we change the world.

    Together we will always win.

    The pimp's head is broken.

  • Glad I found your channel.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more