Added: 2 years ago
From: 01e9
Views: 59,866
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (135)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • تعال تقلقل

  • guy below me must be a weapons expert 

  • Unreliable, and wouldn't make a scratch in a Challenger 2.

  • @sangolt88 Idiot... Challenger II frontal armor was penetrated by an RPG-29... Read it up, dipshit.

  • @Hatinonthehaters not a chance. A dent, perhaps.

  • The best thing to say to your buddy before he shoots the RPG-32 would be "Smoke em''. I cant wait to see this in action. 1500 is being sent to Lebanon and Argentine will be manufacturing this under license. It shows how awesome and cheap it is. Its capabilities is much more than is worth.

  • @metalkindofguy16

    The Javelin and the RPG-32 are two diffrent types of AT weapons, one is a LAT which is used in a squad level, the Javelin is used in a company level.

    Plus it cost USD$80,000 per shot... and it's not free fire on buildings, it can only hit objects in free fire with a -->distinct<-- heat sig. from backround objects, and can easly be decoyed by IR smoke. It failed to hit technicals moving at 80+kmh, and it is used in roles today where cheaper missiles could be used.

  • @Talshet

    1500mm of RHA are you off your head. The AT-14 Kornet can't even penetrate that much, the RPG-7 with the PG7-VR (Tandom/Duel HEAT warhead) can penetrate 700-650mm RHA after ERA effects.

    Not 1000mm plus.

  • @cardude1992

    Fin stabilized. It's a man portable, light weight AT launcher that can penetrate 700mm of armor, making it guided would meen adding a guided system, for the rockets size (which would then be guided making it a missile) they would have to make it more bulky for it to penetrate 700mm of armor, it would also add more weight.

    If they do, do any upgrades, they should increace the speed of flight from 120m/s to about 200m/s. This alone improves accuracy and resistance to wind.

  • is it also guided or just fin stabilized?

  • RPG-32 'Hashim' manufactured in Jordan and not in USA

    so the name of Jordan is the Hashemit Kingdom of JORDAN

  • @warfighter285 You are totaly wrong the RPG-32 destroyed Merkava mk4 wich is the best armored MBT and your M1 have about 60% armor of Merkava mk4.

  • and just in case you were wondering when i was mentioning that your weapons werent fully battle tested. i was referring to the T-90 Mil Mi-28, and the RPG-32 and such.

  • i sware i cant even watch a Russian weapon on youtube without all you dipshit talking shit on american weapons and tanks and what not. have your weapons been fully battle tested? no. i agree that the RPG-29 and RPG-32 are great anti-tank weapons, but the Javelin is better because it attacks the weakest part of the tanks armor. and as of for the Abrams it did a great job during Desert Storm and Iraq War. sure some were disabled do to the RPG 29 but thats why we've upgraded it with the TUSK system

  • @metalkindofguy16

    I think everyone agrees that Javelin is a far superior system, but with a TREMENDOUS cost. A single Javelin missile costs 80000USD, that's prohibitive for most armies. And let's not forget about the maintenance, training etc...

    On the other side the RPG-32 is cheap, and easy to fire. The maintenance required for optimal operation is minimal, and a RPG cost is low, very low.

    And yes, it has been battle tested.

    Regards.

  • @fumega well last time i check it was not battlefield tested.. and yes it is a cheaper easier weapon to maintain. and i respect that 100% about russian weapons. but an 80,000 dollar rocket from a Javeline against a 2.5 million dollar tank. or any other armored vehicles out there. and its wide variety to select targets and the fact you can fire it from within a building and get away is a major advantage in Urban warfare.

  • RPG-32 will destroy M-1 Abrams jew merkava mk3 and all american shit

  • Comment removed

  • @DrPiterarnett true

  • @IceStep945 true lol but at least have a new verson the rpg 7 is only one step more from the rpg 2

  • why do games use the old faulty rpg7 when there is this

  • @420foefoe well the rpg 7 is more mobile and more widly used than this

  • @TheAlexagius but it is so useless at range and like it misses most of the time so i never use it in games like try to take out something that is just staying still you wont hit it half the time since the grenade will pull it ether up or down to early and if you ever play far cry two if you are too close it wont even blow up or sometimes in that game it will just fall out and you have to run i mean have to or you die not many games do that but its still just out dated to me

  • @420foefoe The old RPG7 can penetrate till 1000 RHA and new tandem HEAT warheads can penetrate 1500 RHA. It can kill with one shot any tank.

  • @420foefoe so that it makes the game harder.

  • @420foefoe this is singleshot. rpg7 is reloadable and is good against both soft targets and vehicles with a weak armor. rpg29 would be both reloadable and able to destroy most main battle tanks=perfect bazooka :)

  • Soon there will be an RPG 356789904939012839238910924

  • The 4 people who disliked were inside that bus at 1:05.

  • the fuck tards are the americans whose been brainwashed to fight and die in a-stan and iraq. like i said before, get yourself some confirmed freemason kills first if you really mean business. tough talk and no results seems like all the so-called free americans can do these days. the empty can rattle the most...

  • when usa makes bad to russia we just afghanistan and iraq some of qour rpgs

  • As soon as some haji fucks do some damage to a ridiculously expensive tank everyone freaks. The reality is that we have weapons of the same capability but no high tech tanks to use them against. The only difference is that the communists sell shit to people everywhere. If we ever went to war with russia then there'd be a shit load of blown up tanks on both sides.

  • @wafflePWNAGE22 hajis are the good guys. they didn't do shit until you guys invented 9/11 and started world war 3

  • @malaymercernary Invented 9/11?! So my uncle just decided to set himself ablaze? So thousands of people just died from nothing? So all news stations in the U.S. broadcast a fictitious image? You should go die in a pit of pig guts and be tied down and eaten alive by pigs you swine piece of shit! Say hi to your cousins in hell for me will ya you fuck! Maybe I'll getta crack to blow ones head in two one day eh?

  • @wafflePWNAGE22 you should hunt down mr bush and his fellow freemasons in their secret society. they were the ones that wanted 9/11 to happen and let your uncle die in a firery grave. hajis were busy fighting among themselves in a-stan and iraq. killing hajis is easy, go kill 33rd degree fremasons if you are the real deal. i don't think you have enough hairs on your balls to do it

  • @malaymercernary Tell me where you live, I'll shove an M4 so far up your ass you'd eat a pig to make me stop. But I won't you fuck tard. stop giving osami blow jobs and move to a productive country.

  • @wafflePWNAGE22

    what a stupid fucking redneck.

  • @yuri60014 Suck my dick you liberal piece of shit. I bet you live in California smoking weed and living off wellfare. Go and hang.

  • @wafflePWNAGE22

    smoking weed is better than being a retarded, beeer drinking inbred like the average ameikan (you).

  • @yuri60014 Move back to your country, I bet your the one here who drinks beer with your lowlife gang members cunt, get off the untied states and destroy a different country.

  • @wafflePWNAGE22

    you're pretty simple minded and stupid, just like a typical americunt. do you spend sunday drinking beer and watching football? dumb hick.

  • the bus shoulda evaporated.

  • I hate Russian weapons, take for example the RPG-29 vs Javelin. The Javelin is loud and gives off a huge smoke trail, whereas the RPG-29 has almost no smoke trail. If I'm the soldier at the end of it, I won't be able to quickly identify where the shooter is. Its sick to be getting shot at while not being able to identify where the shots are coming from.

  • @joeheng You don't have to be within LOS to shoot the Javelin. With the RPG-29 you have to be in LOS.

  • @Davemercd Really? Do forgive my ignorance. Does this mean I can fire a Javelin and hide? I mean...how does this work?

  • @joeheng80 No,its pretty much hard to hide with such a large weapon(and set-up) and two of you manning it...It has a firing time of like 5 mins and it needs to be cooled before firing again...

  • what about armored presidential cars ? like Cadillac One or Mercedes Benz Pullman Guard ? can the cadillac one take a hit from rpg-32 or 29,27 ? i know challanger 2 penetrated by rpg 29 attack but do u think presidential cars are more armored than tanks ?

  • @MrTurkishAzeriNY ... new active protective systems like IRON FIST from Israel engage the incoming round before impact, this is what you will see used in presidential convoys rather than 5 feet of armour.

  • the AT is always superior to the tank. the taliban need the rpg-32, send em a few and also some modern shoulder AAs.

  • nice...

  • matador is better

  • i use this for fishing!!

  • sound like a Proffesional fireworks 'ssssh Boom'

  • if the palestinians have this thing...

    this may give the israeli's a hell of a ride in their tanks....

    this thing is a pain in the ass....

  • There are no counter measure for the RPG's or shoulder launch weapons..If you think that the Trophy or anything else like it to protect the tank you are dreaming.This is my opinion "they say it is a secret but all it is a multi-barrel with row of electronic bullets in them that is link to a so call radar".

  • its useless now

    watch?v=n-Ri-kce6pA

  • is it reloadable?

  • @Tarik360 OMg. Its like saying does it work. Rofl

  • @Leny1777 well, i heard that some anti-armour weapons isn't reloadable (didn't get the info from games) so i was only curious...

  • Cartridges caliber 72 and 105 mm are two types of shots: Tandem HEAT and fuel fragmentation armor. The choice of ammunition can destroy all existing types of goals: the modern and future tanks, armored vehicles, fortifications, infantry, etc.

    Cumulative grenade RPG-32 the most powerful among all the existing systems of a similar caliber.

  • this thing fires that tandem heat rounds, right?

  • @MatoVuc Not only, rpg-32 is intended to destroy tanks, armor-piercing rocket-propelled grenade this is 1000 cm layered armor.

  • i was just checking... i read that it uses tandem HEAT rounds and Thermobaric anti-infantry munitions... the tandem heat is a geniously simple way to bypass ERA armor and thermobaric is excelent against infantry, especially in enclosed spaces(i.e. buildings, bunkers, etc.)

    any other munition types in use with this thing?

  • @MatoVuc Currently, for RPG-32 ready-thermal and tandem HEAT warhead. Thermobaric warhead designed to defeat enemy personnel, fortifications and lightly armored equipment. Tandem HEAT warhead designed to destroy heavily armored (including those with ERA) equipment of the enemy.

  • @MatoVuc For the RPG-32 splinter developed and high-explosive shells, as well as innovative for the Russian anti-tank grenade projectile with homing elements, capable of engaging enemy armor, even with poor-quality sighting, which greatly facilitate the use of rocket-propelled grenade slabopodgotovlennym staff.

  • Made in Jordan & Russia

  • fuck this is so much smaller and easier to handle than the B-29 this is bad news for modern tanks

  • these weapons are of different classes

  • great!, right at the bus

  • What about the RPG-28 :)

  • @AK107

    RPG-28 is a fucking monster.

  • adrastea99 -- RPG-29 is made to fight ERA armour ,.,, has better penetration , but it is heavier and longer than HAshim ,,,

  • this is not good as RPG 29

    and it is not good agains tanks

    it can be used agains small carriers or small bunkers

  • Don't vote his comment down, he's right

    The RPG32 system has less penetration than RPG29, it can still engage MBTs though

    The 32 also has better accuracy (you won't miss), is lighter (you can carry more) and cheaper (you can produce more), and it can attack very different targets (you can use it more)

    32 is still a better system than the 29 in my opinion, simply because the 29 is too difficult to use for basic infantry

    I suspect that the 29 would do it's best work mounted on tanketes and APC

  • WRONG.... This can Smash a m1a1 tank in 2 SHOTS...

  • ...... you do know that this will never be able todo any damage to a M1a1 ,a2 or the specially armored brams right?

  • Are you kidding? There has been a confirmed kill by the RPG-29 of the British Challenger 2 tank in one shot. It penetrated the frontal ERA and hull (where the armor is the most substantial). And it has also taken out an M1A1 tank. When the Israelis went into Lebanon in '06 many Merkavas and other armored vehicles were disabled by the RPG-29. But this is the RPG-32, which is still very new, so relatively untested. But I am confident it can take out most, if not all, modern tanks.

  • m1a1 isnt the specially armored tank im talking about. Regardless anyone who fired that RPG would likely eaither A hit it and do small damage then get blown to small chunk of flesh and bone or B hit do damage but not enough damage to stop the tank from working or C get taking out by a helicopter :D

  • Lol I think you are a bit naive and overly optimistic when it comes to modern warfare. Tanks are not as invincible as they once were. All military analyst acknowledge this. Because its much cheaper and more effective to produce a man handled anti-tank weapon than to invest into an impervious tank; which is impossible in modern times anyway. And I don't know what 'specially armored' tank you are talking about. The Challenger 2 tank is made out of the most modern materials, or Chobbham armor which

  • is classified. And if the RPG-29 (produced since the 1980s) can penetrate the frontal armor of this along with it's ERA, it can take out most, if not all, types of M1 tanks available to the US army. The M1A1 also uses the classified Chobbham armor and it has DU armor as well, which the RPG-29 defeated. You think it's hard for a insurgent to disable a tank? You should sign up for the US army and get posted to Afghanistan.

  • Thats pretty sad, wasting money on tanks when u can take it out with something cheaper. lol...nice one.

  • @RichardGold8 Tanks are still useful though. They are still a heck of a fighting machine. In a conventional battle they are still indispensable when used alongside the air-force. If you can gain air superiority, tanks are basically going to dominate the battlefield. In urban fighting it's also useful as a psychological weapon and bullet magnet; of course they are still vulnerable. But not as vulnerable as an APC and troops. But yeah, in the right circumstance, they can be ineffective and costly

  • @RichardGold8

    Tanks are not exactly stationary bus wreckage, they move, (good luck hitting a moving tank with that thing at reasonable range) and they have armor, It's not 1shot=1kill

  • I've not been into the army yet, pardon me, but I believe that with such impact, even if the tank still survies barely, the poeple in there would have their heads knocked so hard that they would faint or even the sound making them deaf. Anyone would black out. Rather than taking a return blow.

  • that's where training comes in... plus for all the mobility and superior armor, the isrealis lost a lot of their most advanced merkava IVs in gaza to ATMs and systems like this...

    correct aim and positioning coupled with good training helps you adjust for the distance and time the rocket needs fly to hit the target so you fire it infront of the tank so that it hits it after said time interval... training makes or breaks a soldier

  • there was never any mekavah 4 lost in gaza it was only an old magach

    and then again there is rafael trophy which would make all anti tank weapons usless

  • @shalomyo

    it's not useless, the trophy system launches metal shrapnel in 360 degrees all around the tank which could also be a hazard to soldiers around it, but also, you cant reload the trophy system so it's a one time thing, all you have to do it launch 2 or 3 rpgs, the first to trigger the trophy system and the second to destroy the tank

  • the trophy has a few launchers placed all around the tank if u watch one of the vids u can see how trophy destroys 2 warheads simultaniously

    plus it also first tries to use electronic countermeasures before launching

    according to rafael te hazard to soldeirs is low but even if this aint true tanks are not always surounded by soldeirs

  • @shalomyo

    no no what meant was, once the projectiles are launched to stop an RPG attack, trophy becomes useless because they will not be able to reload projectiles mid battle so after trophy is used in battle, the tank can be taken out by a second RPG

  • the reload is automatic (not manual) and it takes only 1-3 seconds to reload

    pleae watch the latest vid on trophy:-

    watch?v=n-Ri-kce6pA

    im still waiting for it to be proved in real battle,suppsodly it was used succefully in gaza 2009 but i think in the next war we will see how effective it is, but so far it seems very effective

  • @shalomyo the reload is in slow mo it taked trophy 0.003 seconds to reload

  • @blobguy1212 trophy doesn't have the reload, that's the other system you mean

  • @djadodh trophy has an auto reload iron fist doesn't 

  • @blobguy1212 trophy has an auto reload iron fist doesn't

  • @lendmeurears the challenger hadn't the maximum armor that is it capable of carry, cuz they did't knew insurgents had the rpg-29. they can put extra armor on but yea it penetrated, but did'nt kill the crew but disabled the tank

  • @lendmeurears I thought only damaged, not destroyed.

  • @lendmeurears

    It requires at least three shots to take out a Challenger

    If you've read the book Sniper One .which is like a solider's war diary

    It stated that RPG most likely would just going Ping and bounce off the surface

  • @y512516 Errr, RPGs don't work like that. Either the jet goes all the way through or it doesn't. They won't go "ping" and bounce off unless the fuse is faulty.

  • @cwjian90

    read the book

    I didn't write it

  • @y512516 And one shot in real life, killed a soldier in a British Challenger

  • @silencefreedom

    Was he sticking his head out the hatch?

  • @silencefreedom he didnt die, he lost 3 toes!!!!!!! 

  • @y512516 three shots to take out a challenger? yet it has been proven to survive 14 shots.

  • @conza410

    like I said

    I didn't write the book!!!

  • @lendmeurears Excuse me, just a word about lebannon, Hezbollah used the Kornet-E missile russian system te destroy all the tanks, not rpg. x)

  • @lendmeurears dude that was not a kill, the driver lost 3 toes after rpg29 penetrated it in al-amarah in 2006, not a kill, the tank is still in service, it just needed repairs to a small section of the frontal hull

  • @lendmeurears How would it of taken out a challenger 2 tank in one shot when the challenger hasn't ever been deployed in the Middle east?

  • @rammen4 "In the August attack, which occurred during an operation to arrest a leading insurgent in the town of al-Amarah, in southern Iraq, the Challenger was damaged when a Russian-made rocket-propelled grenade, known as an RPG-29, defeated the ERA and penetrated the driver's cabin." - The Daily Telegraph (Source: The Daily Telegraph "MoD kept failure of best tank quiet") [I can't post the link, so search the title up]

  • @lendmeurears Well, i never knew that! Will make for interesting reading. I just assumed as the Challenger is heavier than the Abrams, it couldn't be used in places such as the middle east :3

  • @lendmeurears the challenger 2's armour has been ugraded since sooo i dunno

  • @LOLben1 That doesn't change the fact that fundamentally its still a tank. No country has the capability to produce a tank that is 100% capable of resisting many of the modern anti-armor weaponry. In fact, it would be folly and impossible to do so. Rrom an economic perspective, it is cheaper to produce a portable anti-amour projectile for a few million versus the cost of spending of tens of millions to improve a tank's, whose military value is increasingly diminishing, armor.

  • @LOLben1 Do you know that RPG 29 has also improved the destructive effect? I dunno!

  • @lendmeurears thats funny cause only 1 challenger 2 has been destroyed in combat and that was a blue on blue with another challenger 2 the worst thats happened so far is a driver lost his leg when a IED exploded underneath because the bottom armor was penetrated but that tank was repaired and put back into service the incident you are talking about was when another driver lost 3 of his toes when a rpg 29 penetrated the underside front armor how the hell is that a confirmed kill?

  • @Ramzzy We could argue over semantics all day, but what I meant by confirmed kill was whether or not the tank was disabled. If you thought that a confirmed kill meant that the tank was blown into smithereens and all its crew killed, or something along those lines, then that's a problem of interpretation. My initial comment was in response to an oblivious individual who thought it was impossible to defeat an Abrams tank. I gave the Challenger 2 example (better protected) to illustrate it was not.

  • @lendmeurears Does the Challenger 2 tank have the best hull armor protection? Is the armor of the indian Arjun tank have better armor?

  • @TSMK900 The Arjun tank is a relatively new tank that is untested in battle. The Indian army paints it as the modern equivalent of many Western tanks. Combining the best of both worlds, Russian and Western technology, But the truth is, the tank is a partial failure. It took decades to develop the tank and the cost spiraled out of control. And the quantities being produced by the Indian military contractors are abysmally small. Its not a worthy tank. And no, the armor is significantly poorer.

  • @lendmeurears Yo dude the British soldier did not die, he just wounded.

    Merkava tank crews tasted dozens of RPG 29 shot, and most of them killed. Imagine RPG 32 in the hand of terrorists like Taliban and al-Qaeda...

  • @lendmeurears But the arjun was said to have withstood a point blank shot from a MB 72 russian tank...surely that it impressive right?

    So they produce them in small supplies, how do you know thier armor is "significantly poorer"?

  • @TSMK900 I did not work on the Arjun project. You need to be part of the team who did to know exactly what armour the arjun has. I know it is significantly poorer because the Indians do not have a strong track record in producing indigenous tanks. Yes the Arjun is a triumph for the Indians, but its no where close to the sophistication of the Challenger 2 tank. That's not saying that the Arjun is bad, just that its unrealistic to think its on par with a Challenger 2 tank and its pedigree.

  • @lendmeurears Time will tell.Although Indians are clever though but from ACTUAL ACTION DATA, i would say the Challenger 2 is the king coz it never got destroyed by another tank besides friendly fire from nother Challenger 2 tank and it's doctrine is all about survivability while all of the other tanks sacrifice such things.

    Heck, you can even make tea inside of it, how epic can you get!

    is the Arjun tank doctrine about survivability too?

  • @lendmeurears

    That wasn't a confirmed kill. it wasn't even a confirmed disabling. It was a confirmed damaging.

    Hell, most rocket attacks just fail completely and the 29 just barely managed to do damage.

  • That with the bus made me laugh.I want to do that with my bus to school.

  • merkava crews wont be so happy about that

  • @fad772 naa in Lebanon the rpg 29\32 failed against the mk.4 but hell even the kornat did and now with trophy well all misslies are useless

  • @fad772 lol indeed

  • better use this to the israeli settler next door because i heard these scums mutha fucka are trying to steal jordanian's land of course this is for the sake of greater israHELL....

  • my name?

  • Comment removed

  • im gonna use that on henrys moms pussy

  • Rare Russen

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more