Hard pressed to find any scilons posting again.not sure if its a knock on effect from debbie cooks e-mail or they are gearing up for next weeks Skeptic magazine(the decline and fall of sci) article on them,maybe they burntout another Val.Anyone in the loop know whats going on?
@OTpowerz vaL has barely been around lately and the rest of the YT scilons have either left Co$ and become independents or have blown $ci completely as far as I can tell.
They didn't hack the FBI or a lot of the sites people think they "hacked" they DDOS them which is easy once you have a legion (y) they are legion meaning over 3000 people which along with zombie computers can slow down a websites server to a point where it shuts down. They completely shut down ps3(: which is beast. And cracked which is dif from hacking a lot of information.
@jorganbon I know, but i dont like the fact that they are wasting their time on scientology. I dont like scientology either. But i just think anonymous is wasting their time with them.
@ilisbaani Well actually they are no longer attacking the Church. And also the Church of Scientology is a big financial scam that brainwashes them with beliefs that have been PROVEN false (their so called spiritual tests and shit). They are also tax exempt. Why the fuck do they get out of paying taxes?
@jorganbon Where did you get this nonsense that Anonymous is no longer at "war" with the Church of $cientology ? No one apologized and no truce was declared. I would know I have been involved in this thing since the beginning. Don't be putting out obvious disinformation. Go to Why We Protest and tell them that and see what happens.
@jorganbon I'm sure. There are lots of vids on YT claiming to be from Anon which aren't, like the ones claiming that Anon endorses Ron Paul for president. Anon would never endorse a specific political candidate .
@bladecat4 i don't think you understood me. I meant that anonymous has apologized to the church of scientology and claims they're backing off because scientology is a religion, and anonymous supports religious freedom. But I am saying that scientology is not a religion its just a lump of shit and should be eliminated.
@jorganbon Anonymous apologized to Co$ ? In what universe did that take place , the Thetaverse ?
Project Chanology was never about what Scientologists practice or believe in and Anon made that clear from day 1. It's about exposing the " Church of $cientology " as an abusive criminal organization masquerading as a religious organization.
Anons tend to get along just fine with Scientologists who have left the "Church" but still practice Scientology.
@sharkattacksteve They did apologize. And they reiterated that the attack was not on people's beliefs. But they still rescinded the attack because they felt it was a hypocritcal move in the end to attack a religious organization. But i personally think that muther fucker needs to go down.
Heh, it's been a long time since I saw this. Better times. Felt like I was a part of something then. Now? Anon is a shadow; an internet boogieman waiting to be forgotten.
@9987coldplayfan Dude, DDoS is not hacking, lol. They used just just a lot od people to coordinate attack to gov servers and they went down for a while, because they couldn't process so many people. Google what a DDoS attack is, you hacker. LMAO
@tehfear Yea that and by informing people just how evil the Church of $cientology and other cults are thus denying them any "new meat" and by protesting outside their orgs and lots of other nifty little things.
Unfortunately, one of the many parallels people drew between the movie and the real world is that wanting people to pay for things is just like the evil, oppressive regime portrayed. Scientology was easily the closest real world equivalent to what they were fighting against in the movie.
This is the one good thing these kids are doing... or atleast were trying to do. It seems like they really made a difference. Scientology seems like it's been taken down a notch.
Unfortunately, they have completely destroyed their imagine with all the attacks/lulzsec bullshit. V is for vendetta was a great movie, but sadly the one message many people took away from it is that you can change the world by hiding behind your computer and launching ddos attacks.
CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER
yes because they say that IQ CANNOT be raised. but psychologists GIVING the IQ test, hoodwinking people into thinking it's somehow "valid" is SO much "better."
Well, homo novice, has ANYONE attained "total spiritual freedom" IN ONE LIFETIME, and the state of *cleared-theta-clear,* as your SOURCE guru, sci-fi writer turned conman claimed in his "From Clear to Eternity???"
If anything, Scientologists seem to die younger than the avg., at least, according to a city of Clearwater study. And a lot of 0Ts -incl 7 & 8s- die of cancer and rare illnesses, at a relatively young age.
@vaLLarrr Those psychologists went to school and they are certified to give those tests as opposed to you and the rest of the oompa loompa's down at the chocolate factory.
you mean the way the people who awarded the Nobel PRIZE to the "inventor" of the LOBOTOMY, and the barbarians who perform electro convulsive "therapy" TODAY are "certified" steve?
Psychologists don't claim they can RAISE your IQ, and there has to be some sort of measurement - like the IQ (duh). So when your cult claims it can RAISE IQ, this can be proven (hahahahaha) with IQ tests. Or could if it weren't total bullshit.
Just make sure to tell your fellow culties to stop giving unreliable information on their websites like "Their IQ was raised by 6 to 8 points" or whatever - and make sure to be as condescending to them as you are to me. K, hypocrite?
Hey, homo novice, will YOU -or ANYONE- attain "total spiritual freedom" in one lifetime, as your master, the phat[con]man Hubbard claimed in "From Clear to Eternity???"
"where does LRH say that he is the ONLY or even the FIRST to come up with the word "Scientology?"
exactly NOWHERE..."
The Phatman told you he "COINED" the word. That he checked with "the people up at Oxford" who told him what the word meant. Don't you have a clear memory, vaL?
coin (past participle coined)
1.to create coins.
2.to make up or invent, and establish.
You can't "coin" (make up or invent) something that already exists.
$cientology is what it always was: pseudoscience; more precisely, pseudoscientific quackery.
Despite Hubbard claiming he coined the word "Scientology," in 1901 Allen Upward wrote a book -The New Word- which contains the first citation of the word "Scientology." It's used in a disparaging way, in the book, to describe "science elevated to unquestioning doctrine."
so now pointing out that someone is "uneducated" or "ignorant" when they ARE, is a SLUR equivalent to calling them a "kike" or a "scilon," right Ranger?
No, Val, it isn't. Climing that unproven, pseudo-scientific quackery can make people "homo novis", "towering above homo sapiens like a skyscraper" and calling non-$cientologists "homo saps", "fresh meat" and "wogs" is a slur, little wannabe-ubermensch.
You mean you CLAIM that it's not pseuso-science? There is no scientific proof whatsoever for ANY of $cientology's bullshit pseudo-scientific claims. None.
As for your witty insult about me not knowing anything about science: I'd like to point out again that the entire scientific community is with me on this one. They know a bit about science.
Val, I find it amusing that you claim that *I*don't know the first thing about science. YOUR CULT makes scientific claims. YOUR CULT needs to present scientific proof. YOUR CULT is unable to.
And yeah, the entire scientific community is with me on this one, Val, remember. I guess they don't give a shit about your cherry-picked dictionary definitions either, do they? Nope, they all agree that $cientology is bullshit. Pseudo-scientific bullshit.
I find it more amusing how desperate you are to sell $cientology's bullshit as science when you can't present a shred of evidence and nobody outside of your cult considers it to be scientific at all, which of course includes the entire scientific and medical community, who aren't as ignorant as to what constitutes as science as you are.
$cientology doesn't work. Prove me wrong since you claim it does. You can't.
And no, $cientology doesn't sell itself - that's why you drones are so pressured to SELL COURSES AND BOOKS and REEL IN FRESH MEAT. You know, sorta kinda like a PYRAMID SCHEME.
You know what would prove me, Anonymous and the entire scientific community wrong, Val? If your cult had scientific proof for ANY of its bullshit claims. Boy, that would really stir shit up. Fortunately, it's never going to happen.
No, Val, but pseudo-scientific bullshit by a proven pathological liar including dozens of claims without an iota of proof in over 50 years... well, let's just say it doesn't look too good for you. Remember the days when Hubbard claimed $cientology could cure cancer, heal bones in 2 weeks and all that?
Are you throwing a fit, Val? What's your point? That I'm wrong because not enough people who don't know me are siding with me in this debate?
Anyway, IF your $cientology bullshit can raise IQ, as your cult claims, it would be easily provable to the scientific community and the world - yet you don't even try because none of your cult bullshit works outside of your little cult bubble of "Knowingness".
But your cult claims "These individuals also had IQ increases of 6 points and 8 points respectively." on their websites, Val. Did they use an "inaccurate test" as well?
You asked me for you to prove something specific, something that COULD be proven, and your cult's claim of raising IQ could be proven with IQ tests - and nobody cares if YOU think they are inaccurate. Beggars can't be choosers.
So you can't prove that claim, can you? Yet your cult claims it.
Uhm, no, Val, your dead fuehrer Hubbard claims non-$cientoogists are beneath clear $cientologists:
"HOMO NOVIS, 1. Homo man, novis new. (BCR, p. 12) 2 . a theta-animated mest body possesed of new and desirable attributes; a mest clear, a good, sane rational mest being about a skycraper higher than Homo sapiens. (HOM, p. 40)" - L. Ron Hubbard (1979 ) Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary
Aren't you glad you could buy yourself an ubermensch-diploma, Val?
Well then, Val, how come Hubbard uses the term "about a skyscraper higher than Homo Sapiens" when talking about his "homo novis" ubermensch? Also, do you remember the ranking list Hubbard made in one of his books? You know, Source, Scientologists, artists, rocks, squirrels, SPs etc.? Got a scan of it on my computer.
In that case, I would be BENEATH that person - and you claimed that wouldn't be the case. Start making sense, Val, you're sort of contradicting yourself again.
So DO you remember the list SOURCE made? SOURCE > PROFESSIONAL > ARTISTS > GOOD CITIZENS > CRIMINALS > ROCKS > INSECTS > FENCE POSTS > FBI CIA INTERPOL > SQUIRRELS > PSYCHS etc.?
Like I said, in that case you are contradicting yourself. Your insulting replies also show how defensive you are, trying to evoke emotional replies instead of the facts I present.
"The dramatic benefits of the Purification Program are illustrated with the Oxford Capacity Analysis personality graphs, above, of two individuals who did the Purification Program. The dotted line shows test results before the Purification Program, the solid line after. These individuals also had IQ increases of 6 points and 8 points respectively." purification-rundown. com clearbodyclearmind. com psychosomatic-healing. co. nz/purification. html
Well, "These individuals also had IQ increases of 6 points and 8 points respectively." sounds pretty much like your cult is claiming that it can raise IQ, Val. It tests for it, too. But, but... you said it CAN'T be tested? I'm shocked!
You've become pretty entangled in your web of lies, haven't you?
Funny, Val, because you are the creationist in this scenario. I got science on my side, but you will have none of it. Science and facts are so entheta, aren't they? Much peskier than "knowingness".
I do have science on my side, Val. The entire scientific community agrees with me, and that kinda bears a bit more weight than culties claiming they got invisible superpowers.
Read the Debbie Cook e-mail Val,then tell me why you disagree with what she said.Alas i doubt you will because you are either afraid to face the truth or have been told not to,because your masters know she was right,Either way how many scilons will she take with her,its not like you can afford to lose any.
@AnonRanGER01 vaL used urban dictionary before as source to claim "enturbulation" was a real word and then I told hir "scilon" was also listed as a word and s/he got all huffy and wrote "So ???? " LoL
@vaLLarrr Gee those are all racial/ethnic slurs val ,are scientologists a race ? Oh wait according to Hubbard they are aren't they ? The race of " Homo Novis' isn't it ? ROLF
Well, tell us about "homo saps". or "wogs", you know, non-$cientologists, who are beneath "homo novis", clear $cientologists, who "tower over homo sapiens like a skyscraper". Tell us about how people below 2.0 on the tone scale should be "disposed of quietly and without sorrow".
So anyway, did Debbie Cook get anything wrong in her e-mail?
"gee, just as if Jews or Scientologists were an "ethnic group" or a "race."
and just as if "kike" or "scilon" was a "racial or ethnic slur."
nice try steve."
None of that (above) has anything to do with the FACT that $cientology is a money $cam and abusive; not to mention dangerous to our modern western way of life and values - such as freedom of speech, movement & freedom to choose one's friends & associates.
gee, good thing neither Hubbard nor $cientology ever produced a *true* [by *def.] Clear and/or 0T.
*[HIS def]
And good thing [well, too bad for YOU...lol] NOONE has EVER attained "Total Spiritual Freedom" "IN ONE LIFETIME," as Hubbard claimed in his "RJ" [Ron'a Journal] "From Clear to Eternity."
Thereby and therefore "HOODWINKING" everyone - including YOURSELF.
$cientology will find it harder and harder to hoodwink others because of Anonymous and the internet - $cientology's Waterloo. Although the analogy is somewhat inadequate for $ci was never as BiG as Napoleon.....David Miscavige, on the other hand, IS. lol As "BiG" as Napoleon, that is. ;D
I'm not saying we should just let this cult go and let it carry on. Hell, its really just a form of elitism under the banner of a cult, I might be wrong (I think I am). All I'm saying is, mouthing off about your views on a video comments thread isn't solving anything, in fact its merely making people think you have nothing better in your life apart from winding people up. Scientology can suck my fat one, Anonymous can lick the balls, both are manipulating, indignant and elitist. free speech plz.
@AnonRanGER01 So you're saying scientologists can BE anonymous? In fact, thats a valid point, How can you be sure of those fellow anonymous aren't just sleepers, deliberately deriding their faith for some other purpose? Moreover, can you be sure that ALL of this, Scientology and Anonymous, aren't headed by the same person/s? I don't pretend to understand how it works but I haven't time to waste trying to, btw I like that you didn't disagree with "indignant" or "manipulating". :)
Well, I showed you that you were wrong about "elitist" because you were wrong about that. On the other hand, everyone is indignant and manipulating sometimes.
Also, Free Speech is the ONE common cause of ALL Anonymous, regardless of the initiative or operation they take part in.
But well, you're not interested in all that.
And yeah, we know everyone can be Anonymous, even $cientologists. That's the deal. No leaders in Anonymous though, period.
Can this be dropped now? Please? This "church" if it can be called that, is an unfortunate accident in the history of man, all because the author chose to stop selling books and start selling redemption (in a somewhat funky and messed up form) to fools who chose that as their "faith". BUT look at any religion and tell me its not the same, (buddhism not included) its just that these guys were duped into doing bad things (lets not forget the crusades) I'm not buddhist btw.
Hard pressed to find any scilons posting again.not sure if its a knock on effect from debbie cooks e-mail or they are gearing up for next weeks Skeptic magazine(the decline and fall of sci) article on them,maybe they burntout another Val.Anyone in the loop know whats going on?
OTpowerz 1 day ago
@OTpowerz vaL has barely been around lately and the rest of the YT scilons have either left Co$ and become independents or have blown $ci completely as far as I can tell.
sharkattacksteve 10 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@OTpowerz
"...not sure if its a knock on effect from debbie cooks e-mail .."
More like a knock-OUT!!! ;-D
jdtrickster4 9 hours ago
They didn't hack the FBI or a lot of the sites people think they "hacked" they DDOS them which is easy once you have a legion (y) they are legion meaning over 3000 people which along with zombie computers can slow down a websites server to a point where it shuts down. They completely shut down ps3(: which is beast. And cracked which is dif from hacking a lot of information.
MrJustdance13 1 day ago
They tore down Websites. Sadly, that's just like tearing down posters hung up by the FBI. Weehee.
Sanitoeter666 1 day ago
Anonymous still runs this.
jdtrickster4 1 day ago
Ah the memories...
iHasaComputer 2 days ago
Who gives a CRAP about scientology. Anonymous, go do something more productive with your time. Lamers.
ilisbaani 3 days ago
@ilisbaani they're saving your ass from an authoritarian government. Anonymous has done a lot of shit over the last week. check up the sopa attacks.
jorganbon 2 days ago
@jorganbon I know, but i dont like the fact that they are wasting their time on scientology. I dont like scientology either. But i just think anonymous is wasting their time with them.
ilisbaani 2 days ago
@ilisbaani Well actually they are no longer attacking the Church. And also the Church of Scientology is a big financial scam that brainwashes them with beliefs that have been PROVEN false (their so called spiritual tests and shit). They are also tax exempt. Why the fuck do they get out of paying taxes?
jorganbon 1 day ago
@jorganbon Where did you get this nonsense that Anonymous is no longer at "war" with the Church of $cientology ? No one apologized and no truce was declared. I would know I have been involved in this thing since the beginning. Don't be putting out obvious disinformation. Go to Why We Protest and tell them that and see what happens.
sharkattacksteve 1 day ago
@sharkattacksteve are you sure? I SWEAR I saw a video where anonymous apologizess and stuff.
jorganbon 6 hours ago
@jorganbon I'm sure. There are lots of vids on YT claiming to be from Anon which aren't, like the ones claiming that Anon endorses Ron Paul for president. Anon would never endorse a specific political candidate .
sharkattacksteve 4 hours ago
@ilisbaani Like what? watch movies on youtube and troll about. Good idea, Lame King.
samagrello 2 days ago
Love this!
fittefeitkrabbe 3 days ago
Man, those clouds really hate Scientology
TheSethman95 4 days ago 4
Still as badass as it ever was
wakstaskate 4 days ago
FUCK THE UNITED STATES NOW ! ! !
cypresspuz 4 days ago
Knowledge is free.
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not forgive.
We do not forget.
Expect us.
Dat. !
JasonaekR21 4 days ago
new Mission Impossbile coming soon: this time Tom Cruise dies at the end
pencewins 5 days ago
Scientology is still standing. WHAT THE FUCK?!
bladecat4 5 days ago
@bladecat4 they've unfortunately withdrew the campaign due to "freedom of religion". ALthough scientology is hardly a religion.
jorganbon 5 days ago
@jorganbon Fuck that shit! Who cares about the law? Scientology needs to die! It's using the law to keep justice away!
bladecat4 5 days ago
@bladecat4 i don't think you understood me. I meant that anonymous has apologized to the church of scientology and claims they're backing off because scientology is a religion, and anonymous supports religious freedom. But I am saying that scientology is not a religion its just a lump of shit and should be eliminated.
jorganbon 4 days ago
@jorganbon Anonymous apologized to Co$ ? In what universe did that take place , the Thetaverse ?
Project Chanology was never about what Scientologists practice or believe in and Anon made that clear from day 1. It's about exposing the " Church of $cientology " as an abusive criminal organization masquerading as a religious organization.
Anons tend to get along just fine with Scientologists who have left the "Church" but still practice Scientology.
sharkattacksteve 3 days ago
@sharkattacksteve They did apologize. And they reiterated that the attack was not on people's beliefs. But they still rescinded the attack because they felt it was a hypocritcal move in the end to attack a religious organization. But i personally think that muther fucker needs to go down.
jorganbon 2 days ago
@jorganbon Let's be honest, though - I've no problem with Christianity, but if they started charging membership people would march like that.
bladecat4 2 days ago
Today is the fourth anoniversary of Project Chanology. I stand and salute you, good sirs. You have crashed the cult of Scientology.
Enturbanon 5 days ago 5
@Enturbanon
One day you will only find the word [Scientology] in history books. ;D
jdtrickster4 5 days ago
Does anyone know what text to speech program they use? Please let me know. Thanks!
P.S. Anonymous kicks ass!
danwasfreakinhere 6 days ago
@danwasfreakinhere Cepstral, voice: David
LadyVetinari 6 days ago
@LadyVetinari Thanks!
danwasfreakinhere 4 days ago
Heh, it's been a long time since I saw this. Better times. Felt like I was a part of something then. Now? Anon is a shadow; an internet boogieman waiting to be forgotten.
Floydzkrieg 6 days ago
@Floydzkrieg Hardly, Anonymous were waiting in the shadows. They are once again hunting.
mikesuper2 6 days ago
this is still the best anonymous video.
TGxDarkMaverick 6 days ago 2
In response to the megaupload farce:
"Anonymous goes on a tear, shuts down a pile of copyright websites"
" dvice com/archives/2012/01/anonymous-goes php "
Now if they can only do that to YouTube on March 1st so I don't have to close this account that would be lovely.
sharkattacksteve 6 days ago
Anonymous......the voice of the people who would otherwise be too afraid to speak
lewcy1 6 days ago
Hail Anonymous! We need you now...please don't let them censure the Internet!
amandapotterify 6 days ago
And anonymous is born.
LegendaryCookie505 1 week ago
I wish I had the skill set to contribute to what anonymous is doing. They are fucking awesome. Godspeed!
rore5455 1 week ago 3
@rore5455 you need no skills to help them.... help pass there word that all the help they need right now
ozzon3636 1 week ago
They are easily hacktivist their doing the world some good
mojomonk3y 1 week ago
They hacked 6 government/music labels today!!
FUCK YEAHHH. Even Justice.gov and FBI.gov are shutdown,
True hacktavists.
9987coldplayfan 1 week ago 71
@9987coldplayfan Dude, DDoS is not hacking, lol. They used just just a lot od people to coordinate attack to gov servers and they went down for a while, because they couldn't process so many people. Google what a DDoS attack is, you hacker. LMAO
TheVoldevie 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@9987coldplayfan
Unidos como um só
Divididos por zero
Somos uma Legião
Somos Anonymous
Aguardem-nos!
As pessoas não deveriam temer os seus governos, mas, os governos deveriam temer os seus cidadãos... Ledmbrem-se disso.
Taking care of the portuguese speaking Comunity ;-)
AnUnion 1 day ago
@9987coldplayfan any retard with a computer in his basement can DDOS someone...not hacking get a clue
radicalphantom1 1 day ago
Não estamos mortos e podemos lutar pelo que acreditamos.
kaiineo 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WE ARE ANONYMUS!
We are legion!
We do not forgive!
We do not forget!
EXPEXT US!
lightjagami 1 week ago
/watch?v=CwGhBL_fZyE
deejayzyx 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jdtrickster4
gee, just as if that wasn't their personal business and none of yours. LOL
like you should care about others achieve as long as they're satisfied.
how pathetic you are.
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vaLLarrr
"...as if that wasn't their personal business and none of yours. LOL
like you should care about others achieve as long as they're satisfied."
ItsA *con* job and a $caM
As *they* say at ESMB, "25,000 EX-Sea Org members CAN'T be wrong!!" ;-D
how brainwashed you are.
jdtrickster4 4 days ago
"Anonymous has therefore decided that your organization should be destroyed."
hahaha and how exactly are they going to do that? By making youtube videos?
tehfear 1 week ago
@tehfear they were able to hack the US government's computer.. im sure they can find a way
snakeblade97 1 week ago
@tehfear they are incredible hackers, they hacked NATO
slpskier95 1 week ago
@tehfear Yea that and by informing people just how evil the Church of $cientology and other cults are thus denying them any "new meat" and by protesting outside their orgs and lots of other nifty little things.
sharkattacksteve 1 week ago
Unfortunately, one of the many parallels people drew between the movie and the real world is that wanting people to pay for things is just like the evil, oppressive regime portrayed. Scientology was easily the closest real world equivalent to what they were fighting against in the movie.
tehfear 1 week ago
This is the one good thing these kids are doing... or atleast were trying to do. It seems like they really made a difference. Scientology seems like it's been taken down a notch.
Unfortunately, they have completely destroyed their imagine with all the attacks/lulzsec bullshit. V is for vendetta was a great movie, but sadly the one message many people took away from it is that you can change the world by hiding behind your computer and launching ddos attacks.
tehfear 1 week ago
see???? this is what happens when some nerd get bored of world of warcraft.......
lucasfialho47 1 week ago
@lucasfialho47 i believe this is something good. Do you even know what scientology is? Go search it up.
DarkMnMChocolate 1 week ago 4
Our god? Do you mean anonymous?
RealisticJordy 1 week ago
best anon video ever.. the rest is secondary
larry89 1 week ago
xD!!! Owned!
tayyabno10 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER CANCER
MrWimz 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AnonRanGER01
oh there has to be "some sort of measurement," so just create a BOGUS one and call it a "valid measurement," huh.
and that's just FINE, RIGHT?
you're a TOTAL idiot.
LMAO
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr WE DON'T WANT YOUR DAMN KOOL-AID!
ekelly1213 1 week ago 26
This has been flagged as spam show
@AnonRanGER01
yes because they say that IQ CANNOT be raised. but psychologists GIVING the IQ test, hoodwinking people into thinking it's somehow "valid" is SO much "better."
LMAO
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Well, homo novice, has ANYONE attained "total spiritual freedom" IN ONE LIFETIME, and the state of *cleared-theta-clear,* as your SOURCE guru, sci-fi writer turned conman claimed in his "From Clear to Eternity???"
If anything, Scientologists seem to die younger than the avg., at least, according to a city of Clearwater study. And a lot of 0Ts -incl 7 & 8s- die of cancer and rare illnesses, at a relatively young age.
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
The good old days...
TheAnonMessage 1 week ago
holy crap vallarrr is still at it :P
adler2adler 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
gee, too bad you are too stupid to know that it CAN'T be proven by ANYONE.
but the fact that PSYCHOLOGISTS give IQ tests that don't prove a damn thing doesn't bother you in the slightest, huh Ranger.
can you say "HYPOCRITE?"
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr Those psychologists went to school and they are certified to give those tests as opposed to you and the rest of the oompa loompa's down at the chocolate factory.
sharkattacksteve 1 week ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@sharkattacksteve
you mean the way the people who awarded the Nobel PRIZE to the "inventor" of the LOBOTOMY, and the barbarians who perform electro convulsive "therapy" TODAY are "certified" steve?
what about it.
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Psychologists don't claim they can RAISE your IQ, and there has to be some sort of measurement - like the IQ (duh). So when your cult claims it can RAISE IQ, this can be proven (hahahahaha) with IQ tests. Or could if it weren't total bullshit.
Just make sure to tell your fellow culties to stop giving unreliable information on their websites like "Their IQ was raised by 6 to 8 points" or whatever - and make sure to be as condescending to them as you are to me. K, hypocrite?
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Hey, homo novice, will YOU -or ANYONE- attain "total spiritual freedom" in one lifetime, as your master, the phat[con]man Hubbard claimed in "From Clear to Eternity???"
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
My god, how far back do I have to go to find the beginning of this comment thread?!
Pokefan2471 1 week ago
But the point is $cientology is still true to its original intent for the word:
Quackery..... Pseudoscience
And, hence, because of all its unfulfilled claims, also a $cam.
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why has every FED Chairman for the past 40 years been a JEW?
Why are the 6 Mass Media Conglomerates controlled by JEWS?
Why is Hollywood controlled by JEWS?
Why were Communist Oligarchs in Soviet Union JEWS?
Why are Capitalist Oligarchs in America JEWS?
Why do our Politicians sign an oath to Israhell?
9/11 was a demolition done by Israel & Zionist Traitors.
Remember the USS Liberty, the King David Hotel bombing, the Levon Affair, JFK murder etc...
parasitesarefunny 1 week ago
@jdtrickster4
so??
where does LRH say that he is the ONLY or even the FIRST to come up with the word "Scientology?"
exactly NOWHERE.
what an idiotic "point," as usual.
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vaLLarrr
"where does LRH say that he is the ONLY or even the FIRST to come up with the word "Scientology?"
exactly NOWHERE..."
The Phatman told you he "COINED" the word. That he checked with "the people up at Oxford" who told him what the word meant. Don't you have a clear memory, vaL?
coin (past participle coined)
1.to create coins.
2.to make up or invent, and establish.
You can't "coin" (make up or invent) something that already exists.
Now, say something else, stupid. ;-D
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
i am with you. I need a mask.
doodleguitarist 1 week ago
$cientology is what it always was: pseudoscience; more precisely, pseudoscientific quackery.
Despite Hubbard claiming he coined the word "Scientology," in 1901 Allen Upward wrote a book -The New Word- which contains the first citation of the word "Scientology." It's used in a disparaging way, in the book, to describe "science elevated to unquestioning doctrine."
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
so now pointing out that someone is "uneducated" or "ignorant" when they ARE, is a SLUR equivalent to calling them a "kike" or a "scilon," right Ranger?
RIIIIIGHT.
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
No, Val, it isn't. Climing that unproven, pseudo-scientific quackery can make people "homo novis", "towering above homo sapiens like a skyscraper" and calling non-$cientologists "homo saps", "fresh meat" and "wogs" is a slur, little wannabe-ubermensch.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
gee, good thing it is not pseudo scientific quackery then.
whew.
as if you know the first thing about science. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
You mean you CLAIM that it's not pseuso-science? There is no scientific proof whatsoever for ANY of $cientology's bullshit pseudo-scientific claims. None.
As for your witty insult about me not knowing anything about science: I'd like to point out again that the entire scientific community is with me on this one. They know a bit about science.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
oh you mean you claim it IS "pseudo science."
prove it.
good thing the dictionary definition of science totally disagrees with you.
whew.
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Val, I find it amusing that you claim that *I*don't know the first thing about science. YOUR CULT makes scientific claims. YOUR CULT needs to present scientific proof. YOUR CULT is unable to.
And yeah, the entire scientific community is with me on this one, Val, remember. I guess they don't give a shit about your cherry-picked dictionary definitions either, do they? Nope, they all agree that $cientology is bullshit. Pseudo-scientific bullshit.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
oh, not as amusing as I find your utter ignorance as to what constitutes science. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
I find it more amusing how desperate you are to sell $cientology's bullshit as science when you can't present a shred of evidence and nobody outside of your cult considers it to be scientific at all, which of course includes the entire scientific and medical community, who aren't as ignorant as to what constitutes as science as you are.
LOL indeed.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
oh gee. good thing Scientology actually WORKS then and sells ITSELF, and I don't have to sell a damn thing.
whew.
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
$cientology doesn't work. Prove me wrong since you claim it does. You can't.
And no, $cientology doesn't sell itself - that's why you drones are so pressured to SELL COURSES AND BOOKS and REEL IN FRESH MEAT. You know, sorta kinda like a PYRAMID SCHEME.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
rubbish. Scientology works great. just ask the many THOUSANDS of people for whom it has worked.
duh
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Rubbish. Scientology doesn't work. Just ask the many THOUSANDS of people who left your cult.
And, oh yeah, accept the fact that $cientology can't prove ANY of its bullshit.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
rubbish. Scientology works GREAT.
just ask all the thousands of people for whom it HAS worked.
and how do you know the people for whom it DIDN'T were doing it right?
oh you DON'T?
how interesting.
duh
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Ah yes, the old "If my snakeoil didn't work, YOU were doing it wrong!" -schtick.
Anecdotal evidence is not exactly considered to be very scientific in the real world, dear Val.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
gee, just as if the fact that they WERE doing it wrong isn't "possible" right Ranger?
because that would prove YOU wrong.
xD
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
You know what would prove me, Anonymous and the entire scientific community wrong, Val? If your cult had scientific proof for ANY of its bullshit claims. Boy, that would really stir shit up. Fortunately, it's never going to happen.
Whew.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
just like the original experiments that DIDN'T prove that relativity WORKED somehow "means" that Relativity was "snake oil," right Ranger.
what an idiot.
xD
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
No, Val, but pseudo-scientific bullshit by a proven pathological liar including dozens of claims without an iota of proof in over 50 years... well, let's just say it doesn't look too good for you. Remember the days when Hubbard claimed $cientology could cure cancer, heal bones in 2 weeks and all that?
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
oh you mean YOU CLAIM it is "pseudo scientific."
claim |klām|
verb [ reporting verb ]
state or assert that something is the case, typically without providing evidence or proof.
got it. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Uhm, Val, it works the other way around - YOU claim it is scientific, so the burden of proof is on you.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
you'll notice of course how many of your "friends" that aren't chronic TROLLS are jumping in on YOUR side, and DARING to debate me.
on an ANTI SCIENTOLOGY THREAD. not ONE.
because they DON'T DARE.
XD
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Are you throwing a fit, Val? What's your point? That I'm wrong because not enough people who don't know me are siding with me in this debate?
Anyway, IF your $cientology bullshit can raise IQ, as your cult claims, it would be easily provable to the scientific community and the world - yet you don't even try because none of your cult bullshit works outside of your little cult bubble of "Knowingness".
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
oh there's absolutely no reason for me to throw a fit, since I'm right and you're wrong as usual.
and you're just too stupid to see that.
DUH.
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
and as if people need to "know you" before they side with you.
it's not enough that your position is utterly IDIOTIC as usual, right?
LOL
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
So Val, your cult could easily prove its claims about raising IQ - if it weren't total bullshit.
Your thoughts on that?
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
rubbish. NO one can prove or disprove someone's IQ since the test itself is inaccurate, and definitively "proves" NOTHING.
the fact that you are too ignorant to know that is really your problem Ranger, as usual.
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
But your cult claims "These individuals also had IQ increases of 6 points and 8 points respectively." on their websites, Val. Did they use an "inaccurate test" as well?
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
well of course they did.
good thing it can't be shown to be any less accurate than any OTHER IQ test given by the "experts."
DUH
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Yeah, good thing if you want to CON people. "Yeah, we can raise IQ, but we can't prove it because the tests are so inaccurate.".
DUH indeed, Val, DUH indeed...
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
OH sure. and I suppose psychologists tell everyone they are "conning" everyone with THEIR IQ tests every day too, huh Ranger.
RIIIIIIIIGHT.
xD
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
You asked me for you to prove something specific, something that COULD be proven, and your cult's claim of raising IQ could be proven with IQ tests - and nobody cares if YOU think they are inaccurate. Beggars can't be choosers.
So you can't prove that claim, can you? Yet your cult claims it.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vaLLarrr
"good thing Scientology actually WORKS then and sells ITSELF.."
Too bad *it* [$cientology] isn't "SELLING" very well, now, is it?
And "the ONLY thing that "works" in $cientology are ITS LAWYERS."
-- EX-$cientologist and long time critic Arnie Lerma (lermanet. com)
whew ;-D
jdtrickster4 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
oh you mean YOU CLAIM they're "beneath" Scientologists.
you mean the way uneducated ignorant people are "beneath" those who ARE educated?
what about it.
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
Uhm, no, Val, your dead fuehrer Hubbard claims non-$cientoogists are beneath clear $cientologists:
"HOMO NOVIS, 1. Homo man, novis new. (BCR, p. 12) 2 . a theta-animated mest body possesed of new and desirable attributes; a mest clear, a good, sane rational mest being about a skycraper higher than Homo sapiens. (HOM, p. 40)" - L. Ron Hubbard (1979 ) Dianetics and Scientology Technical Dictionary
Aren't you glad you could buy yourself an ubermensch-diploma, Val?
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
uhm no Ranger. non Scientologists are no more beneath Scientologists than uneducated people are below educated people.
unless they ARE beneath them, of course.
DUH.
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Well then, Val, how come Hubbard uses the term "about a skyscraper higher than Homo Sapiens" when talking about his "homo novis" ubermensch? Also, do you remember the ranking list Hubbard made in one of his books? You know, Source, Scientologists, artists, rocks, squirrels, SPs etc.? Got a scan of it on my computer.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
gee, wonder how much higher a highly educated person is than a complete ignoramus like yourself.
a skyscraper perhaps?
DUH
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
In that case, I would be BENEATH that person - and you claimed that wouldn't be the case. Start making sense, Val, you're sort of contradicting yourself again.
So DO you remember the list SOURCE made? SOURCE > PROFESSIONAL > ARTISTS > GOOD CITIZENS > CRIMINALS > ROCKS > INSECTS > FENCE POSTS > FBI CIA INTERPOL > SQUIRRELS > PSYCHS etc.?
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
oh you sure would be beneath that person, because you're a complete ignoramus.
guess ignoramus is a "slur," huh. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Like I said, in that case you are contradicting yourself. Your insulting replies also show how defensive you are, trying to evoke emotional replies instead of the facts I present.
Do you remember the list, Val?
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
rubbish. I'm not "contradicting" myself in any way.
it is YOU who won't say just what EXACTLY you would accept as proof SPECIFICALLY.
and you STILL won't of course.
because you CAN'T. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
I told you a couple of times, Val.
$cientology claims it can raise people's IQ. Put that under independent scrutiny. You know, SCIENCE.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
gee, good think there is no OFFICIAL claim that they can raise people's IQ, since that is impossible to prove.
whew.
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
"The dramatic benefits of the Purification Program are illustrated with the Oxford Capacity Analysis personality graphs, above, of two individuals who did the Purification Program. The dotted line shows test results before the Purification Program, the solid line after. These individuals also had IQ increases of 6 points and 8 points respectively." purification-rundown. com clearbodyclearmind. com psychosomatic-healing. co. nz/purification. html
You were saying?
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
gee, just as if that was an OFFICIAL CLAIM of "proof," which it ISN'T of course.
DUH
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Well, "These individuals also had IQ increases of 6 points and 8 points respectively." sounds pretty much like your cult is claiming that it can raise IQ, Val. It tests for it, too. But, but... you said it CAN'T be tested? I'm shocked!
You've become pretty entangled in your web of lies, haven't you?
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
it's like asking a creationist just what evidence would convince them that evolution is a fact.
they never answer that.
because they CAN'T.
just like YOU.
LOL
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Funny, Val, because you are the creationist in this scenario. I got science on my side, but you will have none of it. Science and facts are so entheta, aren't they? Much peskier than "knowingness".
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
funny how you "think" you CLAIMING that you have science "on your side" is enough to make it "true."
just like bigfoot. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
I do have science on my side, Val. The entire scientific community agrees with me, and that kinda bears a bit more weight than culties claiming they got invisible superpowers.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
@AnonRanGER01
oh you mean YOU CLAIM you have science on "your side."
and that the "entire scientific community" agrees with you.
and that the so called scientific community DOESN'T get it constantly WRONG ANYWAY, so just as if that would prove anything even if it WERE true. LOL
vaLLarrr 1 week ago
@vaLLarrr
Yes, I claim that. Feel free to debunk my claim by presenting any noted scientist endorsing any of Scientology's scientific claims.
AnonRanGER01 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Anonymous will be extinct sooner or later because Technological Singularity will know everything...
death153278 2 weeks ago
wow.these guys are good.x you really know the medium & message.
p.s the germans are the only west.country that has banned scientol. bravo.
pickasomangoes 2 weeks ago
Read the Debbie Cook e-mail Val,then tell me why you disagree with what she said.Alas i doubt you will because you are either afraid to face the truth or have been told not to,because your masters know she was right,Either way how many scilons will she take with her,its not like you can afford to lose any.
OTpowerz 2 weeks ago
Uhh...how do we know this is even really Anonymous, or if its just some kid with a computer, saying what ever.
LifesATaintedWonder 2 weeks ago
@LifesATaintedWonder Fair call,however its bonafide.
Anon would of counterd if it was not etc
Search Huff.post and "scientol & the internet wiki" for clarifications.
pickasomangoes 2 weeks ago
@jdtrickster4
gee, good thing you have no idea whether Scientology ever produced a true clear or not.
ROFLMAO
whew.
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
Too bad for "your point" that I do. And $cientology hasn't
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!
whew.
jdtrickster4 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
Now, say something else, stupid.
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!
jdtrickster4 2 weeks ago
freakin creepy its times like this i am happy i dont live in america
1funnygame 2 weeks ago
$cientology = fraud
zaqmlp1234 2 weeks ago
@AnonRanGER01
oh that's ok, I don't expect any different from YOU of course, you Nazi.
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
You mean "you homo sap", or "you wog", "homo novis" wannabe ubermensch? How's the obliteration of the "psychs" coming along?
AnonRanGER01 2 weeks ago
your opinion on debbie cook val,did you read the e-mail,the knock on effect from this will put another nail in the coffin of your looney cult
OTpowerz 2 weeks ago
I DONT LIKE SCIENTOLOGY
GOD IS NOT SCIENCE
GOD DOESNT EVEN EXIST
WHY DID THEY TAKE THAT NAME??
SCIENTOLOGY IS NOT SCIENCE
THEY ARE JUST TRYING TO MAKE A RELATION BETWEEN SCIENCE AND SPIRITISM
AND THAT CANT BE NAMED SCIENTOLOGY
GabrielBerbel1997 2 weeks ago
@GabrielBerbel1997 Scientology = Science fiction....
AnonymouslyFrank 2 weeks ago
FUCK SCIENTOLOGY
GOD IS NOT SCIENCE
GOD DOESNT EVEN EXIST
WHY THE FUCK DID THEY TAKE THAT NAME??
SCIENTOLOGY IS NOT SCIENCE
THEY ARE JUST TRYING TO MAKE A RELATION BETWEEN SCIENCE AND SPIRITISM
GabrielBerbel1997 2 weeks ago
InfamousMaximus 2 weeks ago
I'm not a supporter of the Anonymous, but if they want to destroy the scientology, I support that...
Payasoplas 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Payasoplas
yea?
do you support people who want to destroy the Jewish religion too?
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
cant find 1 scilon posting anywhere since debbie cook,never seen it like this ever!.Must be a massive shitstorm at co$
OTpowerz 2 weeks ago
@OTpowerz
oh SO sorry, but there's no such thing as a "scilon."
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
oh SO sorry, scilon.
AnonRanGER01 2 weeks ago
@AnonRanGER01 vaL used urban dictionary before as source to claim "enturbulation" was a real word and then I told hir "scilon" was also listed as a word and s/he got all huffy and wrote "So ???? " LoL
sharkattacksteve 2 weeks ago
@sharkattacksteve
gee steve. "nigger" is a real word too.
and so are "kike," "spic," "wop," "mick" etc etc etc for that matter.
so?
what's your "point."
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr Gee those are all racial/ethnic slurs val ,are scientologists a race ? Oh wait according to Hubbard they are aren't they ? The race of " Homo Novis' isn't it ? ROLF
sharkattacksteve 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
gee, just as if Jews or Scientologists were an "ethnic group" or a "race."
and just as if "kike" or "scilon" was a "racial or ethnic slur."
nice try steve.
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
Well, tell us about "homo saps". or "wogs", you know, non-$cientologists, who are beneath "homo novis", clear $cientologists, who "tower over homo sapiens like a skyscraper". Tell us about how people below 2.0 on the tone scale should be "disposed of quietly and without sorrow".
So anyway, did Debbie Cook get anything wrong in her e-mail?
AnonRanGER01 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@vaLLarrr
"gee, just as if Jews or Scientologists were an "ethnic group" or a "race."
and just as if "kike" or "scilon" was a "racial or ethnic slur."
nice try steve."
None of that (above) has anything to do with the FACT that $cientology is a money $cam and abusive; not to mention dangerous to our modern western way of life and values - such as freedom of speech, movement & freedom to choose one's friends & associates.
Now, say something else, stupid. ;D
ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!
jdtrickster4 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jdtrickster4
gee, good thing Scientology is not trying to
"hoodwink" anyone then.
whew.
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago
@vaLLarrr
gee, good thing neither Hubbard nor $cientology ever produced a *true* [by *def.] Clear and/or 0T.
*[HIS def]
And good thing [well, too bad for YOU...lol] NOONE has EVER attained "Total Spiritual Freedom" "IN ONE LIFETIME," as Hubbard claimed in his "RJ" [Ron'a Journal] "From Clear to Eternity."
Thereby and therefore "HOODWINKING" everyone - including YOURSELF.
whew.
ROFLMAO
jdtrickster4 2 weeks ago
$cientology will find it harder and harder to hoodwink others because of Anonymous and the internet - $cientology's Waterloo. Although the analogy is somewhat inadequate for $ci was never as BiG as Napoleon.....David Miscavige, on the other hand, IS. lol As "BiG" as Napoleon, that is. ;D
jdtrickster4 2 weeks ago
I'm not saying we should just let this cult go and let it carry on. Hell, its really just a form of elitism under the banner of a cult, I might be wrong (I think I am). All I'm saying is, mouthing off about your views on a video comments thread isn't solving anything, in fact its merely making people think you have nothing better in your life apart from winding people up. Scientology can suck my fat one, Anonymous can lick the balls, both are manipulating, indignant and elitist. free speech plz.
KingOfMartyrTown 2 weeks ago
@KingOfMartyrTown
Anonymous is elitist? Dude, ANYONE can be Anonymous. It doesn't get less elitist than that.
AnonRanGER01 2 weeks ago
@AnonRanGER01 So you're saying scientologists can BE anonymous? In fact, thats a valid point, How can you be sure of those fellow anonymous aren't just sleepers, deliberately deriding their faith for some other purpose? Moreover, can you be sure that ALL of this, Scientology and Anonymous, aren't headed by the same person/s? I don't pretend to understand how it works but I haven't time to waste trying to, btw I like that you didn't disagree with "indignant" or "manipulating". :)
KingOfMartyrTown 2 weeks ago
@KingOfMartyrTown
Well, I showed you that you were wrong about "elitist" because you were wrong about that. On the other hand, everyone is indignant and manipulating sometimes.
Also, Free Speech is the ONE common cause of ALL Anonymous, regardless of the initiative or operation they take part in.
But well, you're not interested in all that.
And yeah, we know everyone can be Anonymous, even $cientologists. That's the deal. No leaders in Anonymous though, period.
AnonRanGER01 2 weeks ago
@KingOfMartyrTown Anyone who thinks that radiohead, coldplay or the bee gees are anything needs to keep their lack of taste to themselves.
sharkattacksteve 2 weeks ago
Can this be dropped now? Please? This "church" if it can be called that, is an unfortunate accident in the history of man, all because the author chose to stop selling books and start selling redemption (in a somewhat funky and messed up form) to fools who chose that as their "faith". BUT look at any religion and tell me its not the same, (buddhism not included) its just that these guys were duped into doing bad things (lets not forget the crusades) I'm not buddhist btw.
KingOfMartyrTown 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KingOfMartyrTown
too bad for your "point," Scientology IS Buddhism with a workable technology, which is lacking in actual Buddhism.
vaLLarrr 2 weeks ago