I've found there are too many people who are afraid of simply asking questions, and of simply being honest about the questions. Psychologically, I wonder what motivates unconnected people (I know why Obama Bush and Clinton lie because they are directly connected to the attacks - its their business, their peers and so on) but why do ordinary people cringe away from the subject. I can't place my finger on the fear. It appears so irrational. Are ordinary people like that afraid?
@tropophyte The problem with the whole "asking questions" meme that seems to repeat through the "TRUTH" movement is that there are people who are ANSWERING your questions and upon watching video after video after video of these so called "Truth" organizers, they don't seem to be listening to these answers. They will ask the same questions over and over again after these questions have been answered many times!
Someone should contact Brian Josephson and show him some 9/11 science...he won the Nobel for physics and is very open-minded and will look at the evidence. He has spoke openly against the status quo on a number of issues based on the evidence vs. just going along with status quo.
@niverent OH!! Okay! Now it's called 9/11 Science! I see! So we have chemistry, physics, psychology, discrete mathematics, engineering, and now and in living color... 9/11 Science! Real good!
Jeremy is a very good investigator. It would be great if everyone would get out there and ask questions like this. See what people say. Not just physic prof or swine flu propaganda, but everyone.
Jeremy makes an excellent point about scientists' de facto complicity in 9/11: they don't shy away from defending climate change or evolution against formidable opponents. What prevents them from speaking out on 9/11?
Whatever "it" is, is is still more formidable. Could this be, as Jeremy correctly points out, because the stakes behind 9/11 are so much higher?
Or more likely it could be that it's a load of baloney.
There aren't any formidable opponents in 9/11 Truth™, just like there aren't any formidable opponents of Evolution. What you do have is a tiny minority of fringe kooks using pseudoscience to try and make a name for themselves. You're assuming that thousands of qualified engineers haven't looked at the collapse very carefully. It's just that YOU don't like their conclusions, which betrays more of a political agenda than a scientific one.
> There aren't any formidable opponents in 9/11 Truth
You wanna test this hypothesis?
Before you get a chance at my time, please tell me how an earth-like atmosphere fire melts iron in the remains of the towers and WTC7 in atmospheric burning. What temperature will the burning peak to?
This is a high-school level science problem. A commonly given problem, I might add.
i was going to reply to grandmastershek until i got here and saw he/she is just trying to stir up trouble. im sorry you dont care that demolition charges were used to bring down the towers. im sorry you dont care about the 3000 dead Americans on 9/11 (some of whom had to choose between jumping to their death or burning to death). im sorry you dont care about the over a million Iraqis and Afghanis who have lost their lives so far
totally, after all einstein was only regurgitating what people were already told to believe. thats exactly how you get the nobel; by agreeing with popular thought.
jeremy, an amazing conclusion... I do not care what bush or obama want the world to believe about 9-11, i refuse to stop talking about the injustices of media negligence and intelligent people ignoring 9-11 truth based off self created bias towards the reality that governments lie, people lie... but i, and every other person must see this for themselves.. and with the proper organization and broadcasting power, we will win the information war.
totally agree. its just like jesus. how ppl cant see that all the lies in the world supporting the big bang and evolution are the work of satan. people just need to open their hearts and stop following their sinful impulses that blind them from the truth.
seriously, truther arguments all boil down to the same faith based beliefs any religion employ.
u have not seen any of my videos? I AM A "TRUTHER" ^_^ this ridiculous game u are playing is like that of religion so wheres the difference?
We are arguing over aspects of life we should not. I do not argue over religion, I do not argue over 9-11 truth these elements in life can not be argued over they simply must be analyzed and discussed.. what you are doing is not looking for intelligent conversation but attention...
the 9-11 truth movement will be strongly supported once it is understood.
Don't waste your time with shek . When people have to resort to name calling they've lost the arguement. Truthers can't grasp basic logic? You mean like kerosene not reaching tempuratures high enough to melt or even substantially weaken steel? That metal under the debris was glowing red hot weeks after the attack? That thermitic residue was foundt in numerous samples of dust from the demolision? He isn't on his own, he's working for someone. We can only guess who that might be.
oh the irony. yes thank you for showing me that indeed you have no grasp of logic. 1. because the temperature of burning kerosene is not question of logic & 2. that argument is a strawman (fallacy of fake positions) because no one in the "official story" ever said jet fuel did either. so thanks for participating and proving my point. no one tested the red hot "metal"...yah know, science?. harrit & jones faked peer review again. bentham is a fake journal publisher. search "CRAP paper"
You can insult the journal the scientific paper was in or you can actually talk about the findings of the scientific analysis.
One of these choices represents the choice of someone who is anti-science and bases their knowledge solely upon perceived social power dynamics, and the other represents the choice of someone open to debate, discourse and an epistemology based on reason.
So, what do you think about the nano-tech bilayered active thermitic chips that were found in numerous samples?
you know, seeing the words "nobel prize winner" before someones name just doesnt mean what it used to since Obama won one. how can Wieman have a noebl prize in physics and have no opinion on how the towers came down? what a coward
i would imagine he has seen what having a conversation with truthers devolves into. he might not want to have an ignorant knob stand there calling him a shill for explaining how the TM's positions is a complete avoidance of logic & based on pseudoscience. anyone who believes you only need a 6th grade understanding of physics solely because richard gage says so demonstrates that the truth movement is a cult. gage is no more an expert on physics than he is on what its like to be a black woman.
hero. armed with your courage, eloquence and knowledge you are more powerful than those defending the lie because you have TRUTH on your side. keep up the great work.
They forget the one most important fact: Once you understand the truth you WILL NOT go back and start believing their ugly lies again. Screw the shill bloggers! They have no real concience or morals. They would kick their own mother in the ass for a twenty dollar bill.
LOLZ! the unending dogmatism in this post is amazing. you should work for the jehovah witnesses. to assume that your beliefs are the "truth" without any possibility of falsification is by far one of the most dangerous things the mind can convince itself of. keep trying to drag us back into the dark ages. should be swell.
The perpetraitors of 9/11; the CIA and the Israeli Mosaad have worked tirelessly and endlessly trying to discredit those that point out the obvious lie of 9/11. They thought they had the perfect plan, but the people are smarter than they are wicked. They have a literal army of paid bloggers trying to spin the truth. It's a hilarious and feeble attempt to try to reign in the belief of their lie. They are so desperate that they have to resort to childish name calling and insults.
It's like a creationist waving a bible at a real biologist and asking him to address points made in this book of bullshit. Or the quran or Egyptian book of the dead. Just because I take your silly little pamphlet, doesnt mean I intend to waste my time when real science is far more productive.
Accepting the official story is comparable to watching the "West Wing" and believing this is the White Houses atmosphere! "Truth is Treason in the Empire of Lies" Instead of making blanket statements about truthers state your Opinion or is it open to 6th grade ridicule! Truthers however ignorant, have "REAL" passion which is more than I can say for SHEEP like "motorartist"Sometimes ACADEMIA=IGNORANT!
Anyone interested in how the academic world stifles dissent should read "Seeing Red" by Halton Arp. Note: I think Arp might be wrong but that is not the point. The point is the methods used by those who control his academic field, astronomy. They go so far as to prohibit telescopes from pointing at his galaxies and quasars of interest. They have even cropped out "his" quasars and galaxies from photos released to the public. Prof. Wieman is smart enough to know all this and more.
Many Jews who know nothing more than you or I do are afraid that Israel might have been involved, even if only as an observer.
The fear that the truth might provoke people against the Jews. They fear that guilty American officials might try to shift blame to the Jews. It is up to us to explain that we do not blame Jews or Israelis for the evil deeds of the Israeli government, just as we ask others not to blame Americans for Bush and Cheney.
This is the end result of the takeover by the government of the "science" community.
The easy research money comes from the government, and you don't bite the hand that feeds you.
Science has followed this path from heroes like Galileo and Socrates to prostitutes like what we have now. Follow the money to the source and you'll see why the government is always above question in the eyes of the "science" guys.
If he had an opinion would he have won the prize? Would he have even been considered? Possibly, but only if it were the correct opinion. He protects his position by being non comnital. People who gain awards and political attention happen to be part of the agenda, and educators who reach the upper echelons of academia have reached that level because they know and understand what is expected of them with regard to political correctness.
You're right - he does protect his position by being non-committal. And the reason he does that is because the goof movement is composed of drooling inbred lunatics who lie and fabricate evidence. Any scientist with more than half a brain would know better than to associate with you.
Sonny boy, you insult your own intelligence with your pejorative immuendos. Evidence has not been fabricated. Kerosene does not melt steel. Thermite does. Thermitic residue was observed in several samples by Physics proffesor Steven Jones, and he got canned for his scientific truth. If you believe the official government fairy tale then you probably also believe in Santa Clause, the Easter bunny, and the tooth fairy. Besides that, you are in a minority by believing such crappy lies.
I love the fact that, right after claiming that evidence has not been fabricated, you go on to make a straw-man argument, followed by pimping the "research" of that incompetent buffoon "Dr" Steven Jones, AND you openly lie about the level of support for your "theories" amongst the general populace. You just shat all over your own major premise. Good job!
You call a physics proffesor a buffoon? You just can't keep your silly little brat ass mouth shut, can you? Go ahead and further insult yourself by resorting to more ignorant drivel.
No, I call Jones a buffoon. It seems that he decided that, since his reputation was already trashed after he got involved with that nuclear fusion debacle, he may as well chuck the whole thing in the trash by jumping on the wacky-wagon and making up evidence to prop up the theories of other lunatics. I'm surprised he's not still supporting his lil playmate, Judy "Laser Beams" Woods. After all, her ideas are only a little crazier than his. You woulda figured they'd stick together.
The insurmountable tactic of the elite is they simply to run down the clock on exposing of any act until the facts become an irrelevance except to historians and philosophers. Meanwhile they'll have had 30-50 years to enjoy the ill-gotten gains and maybe face an indictment in their old, old age. Justice delayed is justice denied.
What's the going rate for your kind of 911 DENIER shill-work?
Do tell the growing number of us who now conclude that a proper investigation into the 911 abomination is overdue just how you get to sleep at night.
Your wicked neuro-linguistic "shell-game" lies and your cheap smears of those following the clear evidence trail to prosecute the criminals of 911 are like the rotten odors drifting from a whore's handbag.
Looks like ol' boy doesn'[t want to lose his cushy job by stating the obvious- that those towers were absolutely without question brought down with explosives.
so obvious you can hear them on the recordings! i imagine no reputable scientist sides with the truth movement because you ppl have yet to demonstrate anything.
Excellent approach. I love how you were sure to request a response. Too bad he was smart enough to not promise one. Here are what I believe to be the 3 most important goals of any encounter, 1) Introduce yourself and provide your contact information along with the evidence, 2) A quick summary of the evidence, 3) A request for a response, and if they agree request a fair time line for when you can expect one.
I believe these are the crucial steps to document and none should ever be left out.
too bad he continued to stalk him afterward. i wonder if it ever crosses the minds of truthers that the reason so many academics dismiss them is because they know its a sham and entertaining such people only leads to circular arguments, appeals to authority, personal attacks, and an embarrassing scene intelligent people would rather not be a part of; at least in front of their peers and students?
no, no , no...it couldn't be that.
reminds me of how biologists refuse to debate creationists.
LOLZ! i love the delusions of twoofers. they are so convinced academia is behind them yet they can't get their nonsense published by any reputable source. the only one who has is jones and he had to dupe a journal which didn't specialize in chemistry to publish it. and it didn't even demonstrate anything. that should be a flag.
the only thing 9/11 truth has ever demonstrated is a severe lack of science & logic literacy, as well as early identification of psychological disorders.
One doesn't get the Nobel prize in physics without being smart enough to know what happened to Steven Jones, on the one hand, and Van Romero and Jonathan Barnett on the other. The latter two played the game and prospered in the government grant money game. After initially expressing skepticism about the official story, both adjusted their public statements to conform to it. Wieman is a young man. Jones' fate would be a heavy burden to inflict on his family, Nobel or no.
You are very right on that. We see that happen all the time now; that people are made an example of and paraded for all those that dare to be contrary to see. If he had taken the position of Steven Jones he would be railroaded as well. That is exactly how leaders of academia operate. They learn early on not to be rocking the boat if they want to go places.
assuming he refuses to have an opinion is based on familial ties and his job is to dogmatically assume your position is beyond doubt (dogmatic). plus it invokes a number of fallacious arguments, not withstanding your most recent; an appeal to common sense. science does not invoke common sense, only people who have no rational basis for their arguments do.
calling your belief a hypothesis in no way changes the reality of the situation. true science has little to do with your beliefs, however if your goingot call your personal beliefs hypothesis you should be prepared to have them placed undet he scrutiny of science. however if we are discussing a hypothesis as it related to logic, it still remains fallacious. take your pick.
Jeremy, First off Big up, but you are doing this all wrong. Walking up to someone and shuving a camera in someones face aint good. Invest in some radio mics and a monopod and film from accross the room. Or invest in a dictaphone and sync the audio up afterwards. Its less intrusive. Also. Why didn't you ask him for his card, or ask him for a meeting first. Be more prepared in your questions as well, write them down before hand. Don't get me wrong this is good stuff, but you need to prepare.
jylesks09 there is not a right or wrong way to do this. if you believe you have a better way of doing what jeremy is doing, then please get out there and do it rather than criticize the heroes.
right, cameras = accountability. you'll never get over the offensiveness of bringing up the subject. but that's the fault of the 4th branch. We Cannot Be Silent.
This is great!!! Don't stop this!!! The world needs to know, our military personal get killed and we pay everyday for this lie!!! Great job regards from holland!!
tbudha, according to MIT professor Thomas Eagar, the impact of the plane was "like a bullet hitting a tree". Negligible.
NIST says it wasn't the structural damage that brought the buildings down, and it wasn't the fires exactly. It was the damage to the fireproofing. Of course they offer no physical evidence to support this hypothesis.
Instead of asking these complicated in depth questions on the spot, ask "How were the WTC buildings destroyed?" That's it. It's quick, direct and impossible to misinterpret. This way they are forced to reveal something about themselves.
I love the statement of "I can address questions, arguments discussions" then makes a statement of having no time all of a sudden. I have a new hero, Jeremy Rothe-Kushel.
It seems that Jeremy Spoke in class today, and school immediately let out!
try giving Carl a call in a couple of weeks. Maybe he has an opinion then? Or maybe he has already made up his prize-winning mind.. What a mind. Carl Wieman!
Even a war criminal like Obama can win a Nobel Peace prize being complicit in the 9/11 inside job, Israel's war crimes and terrorism committed against the Palestinians and the bolstering of more US troops in Afghanistan to secure the US control of heroin in that region, and AmeriKKKa's continued use of torture abroad.
Nothing but the BEST from you guys, well no, YOU SIR. Very nice to see you workin it for people like me. I believe you as EVERYONE should. Thanks for tomorrow today. Some how some way your effort will pay. THANKS THANKS THANKS
Jeremy strikes again! Rock on! You guys are really getting this down. Keep it up! Great new look, Jeremy. Good closing remarks too. That's a big step forward, "no opinion".
the reason no one will say anything, non of these people will say anything because of fear, because they know that if they use true logic and talk truth...they will be torn to shreds, they would be demonized and made into monsters. using the media whore they can turn even the greatest saint into a demon. you guys are doing great work, but the thing is, this man would have to choose between his noble prize, life and family or telling the truth to some random stranger on the street.
the physics prove that the buildings could not have fallen at the rate of gravity unless assisted by a controlled demolition.If this guy denys that he's not much of a physicist.
WHAT'S that bitch doing running her fingers through here hair like she's thinking oh no,,,another 9/11evener....this country is so fucking sick! THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A FULL INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION A 8 FUCKING YRS AGO for all those murders....fucking sick and pathetic
No use in hoping these men will actually do something about it... If someone has a position of power, or a position of prestige... they will Never risk that position by speaking out about 9/11
ONLY WE as a community can change things.. Only when millions of people refuse to grease the gears of the American empire.. A massive general strike will bring this beast down,
This bearded man (I dont know his name), keep turning up in you videos, and I think he is the bomb. Some day, I hope I will be able to shake this mans hand - hell, I might even give him a hug, ha ha. The work you do, is so important, but I guess you know that already. I help Niels Harrit in Denmark, arranging some lectures and inviting people with flyers. Niels´s next lecture is my 15th time attending his lecture.
It's sad to see the science community not getting involve. 911 is such a great opportunity to expose the evils of our government. I cant think of better way than researching 911 to open the mind of the people to these matters but they don't seem interested. I guess time might change that. I hope.
Yeah, there's an optical illusion that makes it look like the driver but it's actually the shiny forehead of the passenger - not a gun. Most serious JFK researchers suggest that the gunman was on the grassy knoll.
i concur. he should've sat him down and explained to him how science actually works and how his entire lecture of learning misconceptions directly applies to the creation of the 9/11 truth movement.
gj,people are so blind,if JFK's limo driver can shoot him in the head in front of the whole world and get away with it,they can do just about anything.
I've found there are too many people who are afraid of simply asking questions, and of simply being honest about the questions. Psychologically, I wonder what motivates unconnected people (I know why Obama Bush and Clinton lie because they are directly connected to the attacks - its their business, their peers and so on) but why do ordinary people cringe away from the subject. I can't place my finger on the fear. It appears so irrational. Are ordinary people like that afraid?
tropophyte 1 year ago
@tropophyte The problem with the whole "asking questions" meme that seems to repeat through the "TRUTH" movement is that there are people who are ANSWERING your questions and upon watching video after video after video of these so called "Truth" organizers, they don't seem to be listening to these answers. They will ask the same questions over and over again after these questions have been answered many times!
jazzfan5000 11 months ago
Someone should contact Brian Josephson and show him some 9/11 science...he won the Nobel for physics and is very open-minded and will look at the evidence. He has spoke openly against the status quo on a number of issues based on the evidence vs. just going along with status quo.
niverent 1 year ago
@niverent OH!! Okay! Now it's called 9/11 Science! I see! So we have chemistry, physics, psychology, discrete mathematics, engineering, and now and in living color... 9/11 Science! Real good!
jazzfan5000 11 months ago
@jazzfan5000 Haha I finally got a reply from jizzfan...It was a completely underwhelming experience. Bye Jizzfan.
niverent 11 months ago
@niverent WOW! I love the uniqueness! I guess I'm going to have to start a tally as to how many times I have been called JIZZFAN!
jazzfan5000 11 months ago
ahahha "if bin laden stood down the laws of physics that day" LOLLL
fazadeset 1 year ago
Jeremy is a very good investigator. It would be great if everyone would get out there and ask questions like this. See what people say. Not just physic prof or swine flu propaganda, but everyone.
Well done.
TheLastAnarchist69 2 years ago
Jeremy is an informed reporter and is a missed quality in journalism
seinfeld11123 2 years ago
Jeremy! You are AWESOME! Sharon in OC!
madebutante 2 years ago
right now spreading the word about NOT taking the false flu vaccine takes precedent.. I have posted videos about it.. thanks for everything WACLA
do NOT vaccinate your kids..
lonchecaliente 2 years ago
Jeremy makes an excellent point about scientists' de facto complicity in 9/11: they don't shy away from defending climate change or evolution against formidable opponents. What prevents them from speaking out on 9/11?
Whatever "it" is, is is still more formidable. Could this be, as Jeremy correctly points out, because the stakes behind 9/11 are so much higher?
Love,
DanUuNoel 2 years ago
Or more likely it could be that it's a load of baloney.
There aren't any formidable opponents in 9/11 Truth™, just like there aren't any formidable opponents of Evolution. What you do have is a tiny minority of fringe kooks using pseudoscience to try and make a name for themselves. You're assuming that thousands of qualified engineers haven't looked at the collapse very carefully. It's just that YOU don't like their conclusions, which betrays more of a political agenda than a scientific one.
ScottishAtheist 2 years ago
@ ScottishAtheist
> There aren't any formidable opponents in 9/11 Truth
You wanna test this hypothesis?
Before you get a chance at my time, please tell me how an earth-like atmosphere fire melts iron in the remains of the towers and WTC7 in atmospheric burning. What temperature will the burning peak to?
This is a high-school level science problem. A commonly given problem, I might add.
If you have an argument then we can continue.
sdkee 2 years ago
i was going to reply to grandmastershek until i got here and saw he/she is just trying to stir up trouble. im sorry you dont care that demolition charges were used to bring down the towers. im sorry you dont care about the 3000 dead Americans on 9/11 (some of whom had to choose between jumping to their death or burning to death). im sorry you dont care about the over a million Iraqis and Afghanis who have lost their lives so far
captainspaulding17 2 years ago 2
totally, after all einstein was only regurgitating what people were already told to believe. thats exactly how you get the nobel; by agreeing with popular thought.
you people are such morons.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
jeremy, an amazing conclusion... I do not care what bush or obama want the world to believe about 9-11, i refuse to stop talking about the injustices of media negligence and intelligent people ignoring 9-11 truth based off self created bias towards the reality that governments lie, people lie... but i, and every other person must see this for themselves.. and with the proper organization and broadcasting power, we will win the information war.
xSammBAM 2 years ago
totally agree. its just like jesus. how ppl cant see that all the lies in the world supporting the big bang and evolution are the work of satan. people just need to open their hearts and stop following their sinful impulses that blind them from the truth.
seriously, truther arguments all boil down to the same faith based beliefs any religion employ.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
u have not seen any of my videos? I AM A "TRUTHER" ^_^ this ridiculous game u are playing is like that of religion so wheres the difference?
We are arguing over aspects of life we should not. I do not argue over religion, I do not argue over 9-11 truth these elements in life can not be argued over they simply must be analyzed and discussed.. what you are doing is not looking for intelligent conversation but attention...
the 9-11 truth movement will be strongly supported once it is understood.
xSammBAM 2 years ago 3
Don't waste your time with shek . When people have to resort to name calling they've lost the arguement. Truthers can't grasp basic logic? You mean like kerosene not reaching tempuratures high enough to melt or even substantially weaken steel? That metal under the debris was glowing red hot weeks after the attack? That thermitic residue was foundt in numerous samples of dust from the demolision? He isn't on his own, he's working for someone. We can only guess who that might be.
mikeadksn 2 years ago
oh the irony. yes thank you for showing me that indeed you have no grasp of logic. 1. because the temperature of burning kerosene is not question of logic & 2. that argument is a strawman (fallacy of fake positions) because no one in the "official story" ever said jet fuel did either. so thanks for participating and proving my point. no one tested the red hot "metal"...yah know, science?. harrit & jones faked peer review again. bentham is a fake journal publisher. search "CRAP paper"
grandmastershek 2 years ago
You can insult the journal the scientific paper was in or you can actually talk about the findings of the scientific analysis.
One of these choices represents the choice of someone who is anti-science and bases their knowledge solely upon perceived social power dynamics, and the other represents the choice of someone open to debate, discourse and an epistemology based on reason.
So, what do you think about the nano-tech bilayered active thermitic chips that were found in numerous samples?
wearechangela 2 years ago
you know, seeing the words "nobel prize winner" before someones name just doesnt mean what it used to since Obama won one. how can Wieman have a noebl prize in physics and have no opinion on how the towers came down? what a coward
captainspaulding17 2 years ago
i would imagine he has seen what having a conversation with truthers devolves into. he might not want to have an ignorant knob stand there calling him a shill for explaining how the TM's positions is a complete avoidance of logic & based on pseudoscience. anyone who believes you only need a 6th grade understanding of physics solely because richard gage says so demonstrates that the truth movement is a cult. gage is no more an expert on physics than he is on what its like to be a black woman.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
hero. armed with your courage, eloquence and knowledge you are more powerful than those defending the lie because you have TRUTH on your side. keep up the great work.
playonwords55 2 years ago 2
They forget the one most important fact: Once you understand the truth you WILL NOT go back and start believing their ugly lies again. Screw the shill bloggers! They have no real concience or morals. They would kick their own mother in the ass for a twenty dollar bill.
mikeadksn 2 years ago 3
LOLZ! the unending dogmatism in this post is amazing. you should work for the jehovah witnesses. to assume that your beliefs are the "truth" without any possibility of falsification is by far one of the most dangerous things the mind can convince itself of. keep trying to drag us back into the dark ages. should be swell.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
The perpetraitors of 9/11; the CIA and the Israeli Mosaad have worked tirelessly and endlessly trying to discredit those that point out the obvious lie of 9/11. They thought they had the perfect plan, but the people are smarter than they are wicked. They have a literal army of paid bloggers trying to spin the truth. It's a hilarious and feeble attempt to try to reign in the belief of their lie. They are so desperate that they have to resort to childish name calling and insults.
mikeadksn 2 years ago 2
It's like a creationist waving a bible at a real biologist and asking him to address points made in this book of bullshit. Or the quran or Egyptian book of the dead. Just because I take your silly little pamphlet, doesnt mean I intend to waste my time when real science is far more productive.
Truthers are so silly.
motorartist 2 years ago
Accepting the official story is comparable to watching the "West Wing" and believing this is the White Houses atmosphere! "Truth is Treason in the Empire of Lies" Instead of making blanket statements about truthers state your Opinion or is it open to 6th grade ridicule! Truthers however ignorant, have "REAL" passion which is more than I can say for SHEEP like "motorartist"Sometimes ACADEMIA=IGNORANT!
starjunkie1 2 years ago
As if a man honoured by the same organisation that gifted a Nobel Peace Prize to obama for warmongering would reveal his true opinion lol!!!
pixarian72 2 years ago
Anyone interested in how the academic world stifles dissent should read "Seeing Red" by Halton Arp. Note: I think Arp might be wrong but that is not the point. The point is the methods used by those who control his academic field, astronomy. They go so far as to prohibit telescopes from pointing at his galaxies and quasars of interest. They have even cropped out "his" quasars and galaxies from photos released to the public. Prof. Wieman is smart enough to know all this and more.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
good job and well said!
jimmydrive 2 years ago
I wanna know what pimps like this grandmaster shrek get paid. This fool reeks of weekly "talking points" web-meetings.
Shrek's DENIER crowd is losing this war now though and they know it.
So now his COINTEL advisors are punting that weak-ass Zionist smear.
Why? Poison the 911 TRUTH MOVEMENT well.
By smearing truthers as Jew-haters they can more effectively marshal the ignorant against the 911 Truth Movement.
Evidence that shrekmaister and his shill buddies are on the 911 DENIER pad.
pyubtinsl 2 years ago
Many Jews who know nothing more than you or I do are afraid that Israel might have been involved, even if only as an observer.
The fear that the truth might provoke people against the Jews. They fear that guilty American officials might try to shift blame to the Jews. It is up to us to explain that we do not blame Jews or Israelis for the evil deeds of the Israeli government, just as we ask others not to blame Americans for Bush and Cheney.
Skeptic121 2 years ago 3
when did i say anything about jews anyway? could it be yet again a truther is making it up as he goes?
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Admitting the truth is career suicide.
This is the end result of the takeover by the government of the "science" community.
The easy research money comes from the government, and you don't bite the hand that feeds you.
Science has followed this path from heroes like Galileo and Socrates to prostitutes like what we have now. Follow the money to the source and you'll see why the government is always above question in the eyes of the "science" guys.
sdkee 2 years ago
Well said sdkee!!!!
pixarian72 2 years ago
yeah, as we know science never rewards dissent.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
great job as always wac. dunno, someone deleted my comment. not cool. although, irrelevant it was. hahaha
911reset 2 years ago
If he had an opinion would he have won the prize? Would he have even been considered? Possibly, but only if it were the correct opinion. He protects his position by being non comnital. People who gain awards and political attention happen to be part of the agenda, and educators who reach the upper echelons of academia have reached that level because they know and understand what is expected of them with regard to political correctness.
mikeadksn 2 years ago
You're right - he does protect his position by being non-committal. And the reason he does that is because the goof movement is composed of drooling inbred lunatics who lie and fabricate evidence. Any scientist with more than half a brain would know better than to associate with you.
c6gunner 2 years ago
Sonny boy, you insult your own intelligence with your pejorative immuendos. Evidence has not been fabricated. Kerosene does not melt steel. Thermite does. Thermitic residue was observed in several samples by Physics proffesor Steven Jones, and he got canned for his scientific truth. If you believe the official government fairy tale then you probably also believe in Santa Clause, the Easter bunny, and the tooth fairy. Besides that, you are in a minority by believing such crappy lies.
mikeadksn 2 years ago 2
Old fart, there's no such thing as an "immuendo".
I love the fact that, right after claiming that evidence has not been fabricated, you go on to make a straw-man argument, followed by pimping the "research" of that incompetent buffoon "Dr" Steven Jones, AND you openly lie about the level of support for your "theories" amongst the general populace. You just shat all over your own major premise. Good job!
c6gunner 2 years ago
You call a physics proffesor a buffoon? You just can't keep your silly little brat ass mouth shut, can you? Go ahead and further insult yourself by resorting to more ignorant drivel.
mikeadksn 2 years ago 2
No, I call Jones a buffoon. It seems that he decided that, since his reputation was already trashed after he got involved with that nuclear fusion debacle, he may as well chuck the whole thing in the trash by jumping on the wacky-wagon and making up evidence to prop up the theories of other lunatics. I'm surprised he's not still supporting his lil playmate, Judy "Laser Beams" Woods. After all, her ideas are only a little crazier than his. You woulda figured they'd stick together.
c6gunner 2 years ago
You guys do such a good job.
rkymtntruther 2 years ago 2
who needs science when you have zionist magic
deepwell07 2 years ago 2
The insurmountable tactic of the elite is they simply to run down the clock on exposing of any act until the facts become an irrelevance except to historians and philosophers. Meanwhile they'll have had 30-50 years to enjoy the ill-gotten gains and maybe face an indictment in their old, old age. Justice delayed is justice denied.
Tobacc0 2 years ago
@ grandmastershek: A PAID 911 HOLOCAUST DENIER.
What's the going rate for your kind of 911 DENIER shill-work?
Do tell the growing number of us who now conclude that a proper investigation into the 911 abomination is overdue just how you get to sleep at night.
Your wicked neuro-linguistic "shell-game" lies and your cheap smears of those following the clear evidence trail to prosecute the criminals of 911 are like the rotten odors drifting from a whore's handbag.
911 WAS a NEOCON job
pyubtinsl 2 years ago
9/11 was an Zionist job.
persona19 2 years ago
Looks like ol' boy doesn'[t want to lose his cushy job by stating the obvious- that those towers were absolutely without question brought down with explosives.
WhiteQueen420 2 years ago 2
so obvious you can hear them on the recordings! i imagine no reputable scientist sides with the truth movement because you ppl have yet to demonstrate anything.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Excellent approach. I love how you were sure to request a response. Too bad he was smart enough to not promise one. Here are what I believe to be the 3 most important goals of any encounter, 1) Introduce yourself and provide your contact information along with the evidence, 2) A quick summary of the evidence, 3) A request for a response, and if they agree request a fair time line for when you can expect one.
I believe these are the crucial steps to document and none should ever be left out.
lytetrip 2 years ago
too bad he continued to stalk him afterward. i wonder if it ever crosses the minds of truthers that the reason so many academics dismiss them is because they know its a sham and entertaining such people only leads to circular arguments, appeals to authority, personal attacks, and an embarrassing scene intelligent people would rather not be a part of; at least in front of their peers and students?
no, no , no...it couldn't be that.
reminds me of how biologists refuse to debate creationists.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Put together an anonymous poll of scientific questions asked of top scientists at a national lab, preferably the one in Berkeley.
Maybe 20 questions, about topics like evolution, abortion/euthanasia, metaphysics, vaccines, etc.
Throw in a question about 9/11 destroyed by explosives.
See what you get.
juice797 2 years ago
See, Jeremy, Dr. Wieman realizes you're a total lunatic, so he's just being polite and trying to get you to leave him alone.
Do you ever plan on seeing a psychiatrist for your problems?
ianat841 2 years ago
Great job. People need to be confronted about 9/11 and decide for themselves whether they'll come down on the side of fantasy or science.
Ask the smartest people you know about 9/11, and you'll find that a large percentage of them know that the "official" story doesn't hold water.
Everybody has to decide for themselves which side of history they'll take. For the sake of all people, I'm hoping it will be the side of reality.
paulrevere911 2 years ago
LOLZ! i love the delusions of twoofers. they are so convinced academia is behind them yet they can't get their nonsense published by any reputable source. the only one who has is jones and he had to dupe a journal which didn't specialize in chemistry to publish it. and it didn't even demonstrate anything. that should be a flag.
the only thing 9/11 truth has ever demonstrated is a severe lack of science & logic literacy, as well as early identification of psychological disorders.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Thanks for trying!
One doesn't get the Nobel prize in physics without being smart enough to know what happened to Steven Jones, on the one hand, and Van Romero and Jonathan Barnett on the other. The latter two played the game and prospered in the government grant money game. After initially expressing skepticism about the official story, both adjusted their public statements to conform to it. Wieman is a young man. Jones' fate would be a heavy burden to inflict on his family, Nobel or no.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
yeah because if we now anything science doesn't reward dissent.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
You are very right on that. We see that happen all the time now; that people are made an example of and paraded for all those that dare to be contrary to see. If he had taken the position of Steven Jones he would be railroaded as well. That is exactly how leaders of academia operate. They learn early on not to be rocking the boat if they want to go places.
mikeadksn 2 years ago 2
His job and the subsistence of his family probably depend on him not having an opinion in this matter.
acrobat741 2 years ago 2
god i love dogmatic thinking.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Nah no dogma, just a common sense hypothesis.
acrobat741 2 years ago
assuming he refuses to have an opinion is based on familial ties and his job is to dogmatically assume your position is beyond doubt (dogmatic). plus it invokes a number of fallacious arguments, not withstanding your most recent; an appeal to common sense. science does not invoke common sense, only people who have no rational basis for their arguments do.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
I struggle to see how a hypothesis can be dogmatic. I may well be wrong.
And science has nothing to do with my assumption. Hair-splitting!
acrobat741 2 years ago
calling your belief a hypothesis in no way changes the reality of the situation. true science has little to do with your beliefs, however if your goingot call your personal beliefs hypothesis you should be prepared to have them placed undet he scrutiny of science. however if we are discussing a hypothesis as it related to logic, it still remains fallacious. take your pick.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Such a shame and a lie to have no opinion~
charlieondmc 2 years ago 6
Jeremy, First off Big up, but you are doing this all wrong. Walking up to someone and shuving a camera in someones face aint good. Invest in some radio mics and a monopod and film from accross the room. Or invest in a dictaphone and sync the audio up afterwards. Its less intrusive. Also. Why didn't you ask him for his card, or ask him for a meeting first. Be more prepared in your questions as well, write them down before hand. Don't get me wrong this is good stuff, but you need to prepare.
jylesks09 2 years ago
jylesks09 there is not a right or wrong way to do this. if you believe you have a better way of doing what jeremy is doing, then please get out there and do it rather than criticize the heroes.
apathysucksb7 2 years ago 2
right, cameras = accountability. you'll never get over the offensiveness of bringing up the subject. but that's the fault of the 4th branch. We Cannot Be Silent.
wearechangeoshkosh 2 years ago
This is great!!! Don't stop this!!! The world needs to know, our military personal get killed and we pay everyday for this lie!!! Great job regards from holland!!
sdjole 2 years ago 3
Thanks for sharing another piece of the puzzle
BLUETIB 2 years ago 3
ya run, run, away! but there's no place to hide, mate!
911reset 2 years ago 3
This Jeremy dude is good. And hes not afraid to talk of the Israeli role in 9/11, Ive heard him make multiple comments about it. Good stuff.
newjack31622 2 years ago 2
tbudha, according to MIT professor Thomas Eagar, the impact of the plane was "like a bullet hitting a tree". Negligible.
NIST says it wasn't the structural damage that brought the buildings down, and it wasn't the fires exactly. It was the damage to the fireproofing. Of course they offer no physical evidence to support this hypothesis.
punxsutawneybarney 2 years ago
kudos
or97035 2 years ago 4
nice breakdown analysis
jkim2049 2 years ago 3
Carl ole boy can't have an opinion about 911 or Carl would be teaching high school science .
RenegadeTimes 2 years ago 3
Instead of asking these complicated in depth questions on the spot, ask "How were the WTC buildings destroyed?" That's it. It's quick, direct and impossible to misinterpret. This way they are forced to reveal something about themselves.
howitzer24 2 years ago 4
Some people are afraid to voice their true opinions.
Considering that obama just got the Nobel prize, I am not sure how prestigious that award is anymore!
I am behind the architects and engineers for 9-11 truth, and have seen their videos here. I hope that they have more success then NYCCAN has so far.
Thanks for the add.
edpotkay1 2 years ago 6
that nobel prize winner is a horrible academic...with no balls and he is part of the problem in this country..
borat443 2 years ago 6
I love the statement of "I can address questions, arguments discussions" then makes a statement of having no time all of a sudden. I have a new hero, Jeremy Rothe-Kushel.
It seems that Jeremy Spoke in class today, and school immediately let out!
Jynx00 2 years ago
As always Excellent job!!
Steeper33 2 years ago 5
try giving Carl a call in a couple of weeks. Maybe he has an opinion then? Or maybe he has already made up his prize-winning mind.. What a mind. Carl Wieman!
njassja 2 years ago 2
Even a war criminal like Obama can win a Nobel Peace prize being complicit in the 9/11 inside job, Israel's war crimes and terrorism committed against the Palestinians and the bolstering of more US troops in Afghanistan to secure the US control of heroin in that region, and AmeriKKKa's continued use of torture abroad.
'Nobel' must mean "bull-shit" in some language.
BCRFRAUD 2 years ago 7
"I won the prize so stfu I'm right, and you have a brain disorder."
Organjic 2 years ago
i think they're all associated somehow
wychoba 2 years ago
Where do we get a copy of the paper?
davidameyers 2 years ago 2
I second that!
disposedof4life 2 years ago
We put a link in the description area under (more info) to the right of the video. Otherwise do a search on the internet for nanothermite paper.
wearechangela 2 years ago
Thanks Jeremy.. great job.
Do NOT take the vaccines. do NOT vaccinate your kids.
I'm probably preaching to the choir but just in case.
Speak out about the false flu NOW.
lonchecaliente 2 years ago
Nothing but the BEST from you guys, well no, YOU SIR. Very nice to see you workin it for people like me. I believe you as EVERYONE should. Thanks for tomorrow today. Some how some way your effort will pay. THANKS THANKS THANKS
AZ
AZwheeler 2 years ago 3
Great job as always!
newgenpirate 2 years ago
this great stuff
militantrebell 2 years ago
Jeremy strikes again! Rock on! You guys are really getting this down. Keep it up! Great new look, Jeremy. Good closing remarks too. That's a big step forward, "no opinion".
evajames 2 years ago
great job l.a.
SICKCHICANO 2 years ago
Awesome job guys. A "No Opinion" says a lot.
buckfush187 2 years ago
Great job Jeremy! Also for the camera person.
KOAJaps 2 years ago
good job man! Great music too! I see this movement only getting bigger...
wearethenightmare 2 years ago
Great work. We will get there.
apathysucksb7 2 years ago
damn, on the frontlines lately my man.
NsaneSk8er007 2 years ago
Quality video. You should point camera to face and just vlog truth. If you do that on another channel please let me know.
DickGhostmoon 2 years ago
just the fact that these people run like cockroaches when the lights turn on proves that they are wrong.
justamomforjesus 2 years ago 2
the reason no one will say anything, non of these people will say anything because of fear, because they know that if they use true logic and talk truth...they will be torn to shreds, they would be demonized and made into monsters. using the media whore they can turn even the greatest saint into a demon. you guys are doing great work, but the thing is, this man would have to choose between his noble prize, life and family or telling the truth to some random stranger on the street.
yimaroo 2 years ago
great job
peace
God bless
kriss
911insidejob81 2 years ago
the physics prove that the buildings could not have fallen at the rate of gravity unless assisted by a controlled demolition.If this guy denys that he's not much of a physicist.
Nice job confronting him.
ChangeStPete 2 years ago 2
WHAT'S that bitch doing running her fingers through here hair like she's thinking oh no,,,another 9/11evener....this country is so fucking sick! THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN A FULL INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION A 8 FUCKING YRS AGO for all those murders....fucking sick and pathetic
finanelly1 2 years ago
No use in hoping these men will actually do something about it... If someone has a position of power, or a position of prestige... they will Never risk that position by speaking out about 9/11
ONLY WE as a community can change things.. Only when millions of people refuse to grease the gears of the American empire.. A massive general strike will bring this beast down,
sgentlemanjack112 2 years ago
This bearded man (I dont know his name), keep turning up in you videos, and I think he is the bomb. Some day, I hope I will be able to shake this mans hand - hell, I might even give him a hug, ha ha. The work you do, is so important, but I guess you know that already. I help Niels Harrit in Denmark, arranging some lectures and inviting people with flyers. Niels´s next lecture is my 15th time attending his lecture.
Thanks for spreading the journal and videos.
BudhistPanda 2 years ago 2
His name is Jeremy Rothe-Kushel.
wearechangela 2 years ago
Thanks - and thanks to Jeremy also :)
BudhistPanda 2 years ago
a physicist not having an opinion OH PLEASE
only believe when there is strong denial
seinfeld11123 2 years ago
love these videos
extremely insightful and articulate
yorkshirepuddiiing 2 years ago 4
where are all the widows of 9/11? huh? where did all of them go? i don't see any of them on the wearechage sites???? WHERE ARE THEY?!
finanelly1 2 years ago
What the driver did was slow down for the fatal blow when he should have hit the gas. It's just as bad.
MustacheVerra 2 years ago 2
It's sad to see the science community not getting involve. 911 is such a great opportunity to expose the evils of our government. I cant think of better way than researching 911 to open the mind of the people to these matters but they don't seem interested. I guess time might change that. I hope.
MustacheVerra 2 years ago 2
Jeremy-- This is a spiritual battle involving a "strong delusion" I am praying for you-- and for all of us who see the truth.
clayvessel 2 years ago
LOLZ! its amazing someone can refer to delusion then say they will pray all in the same post.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
Talk about shrinking from controversy...
vidmanx0 2 years ago
Yeah, there's an optical illusion that makes it look like the driver but it's actually the shiny forehead of the passenger - not a gun. Most serious JFK researchers suggest that the gunman was on the grassy knoll.
vidmanx0 2 years ago
Well Done.
AlexFate101 2 years ago 5
no opinion hahah.pussy
stophateing 2 years ago 3
i concur. he should've sat him down and explained to him how science actually works and how his entire lecture of learning misconceptions directly applies to the creation of the 9/11 truth movement.
grandmastershek 2 years ago
gj,people are so blind,if JFK's limo driver can shoot him in the head in front of the whole world and get away with it,they can do just about anything.
RebelRouserMC 2 years ago
Great work guys,, keep asking them questions.
Lynnskywatch 2 years ago 2
Always a treat guys!
My wish is to be in LA next year...pigs can already fly so I have to now don't I?! lol
WeAreChangeBrisbane 2 years ago 3