FCC Public Hearing/ Tampa: MARK A. ADAMS tells the FCC...

[20130807]

the FCC whont let me be so fuck the FCC all they do is cuver up indesent notady and shit well fcc u fucked up assholes

[Hsaive]

If the choice of presidents becomes a vote for Hillary or McCain the election will guarantee a vote for perpetual war and more division. Hillary is a vindictive divider.

If 9/11 is not investigated before either of them take office it could well guarantee that justice for mass murder and controlled demolition of 3 WTC buildings will never be achieved.

[donT4ge2chukLevryday]

congress shall make NO Laws....

fuck the FCC back to the hole it came out of.

[monicasuetannehill]

Jeannie, thank you! I'm on it. What is more important than the vote? NOTHING.

[donT4ge2chukLevryday]

honesty.

[monicasuetannehill]

the vote. the honest vote. the honest selection of who runs the world. the truth about why and how someones child died in iraq, the truth about why we're at war, the truth. honesty. the vote.

[PEACendwarWORLDpeace]

the vote is like the chain. as strong as the weakest link.

certainly it is an important issue, but not THE most important issue.

fixing the way people are educated to think and act is way above the vote.

peacEveryonEverywherEveryday is not something to vote about as much as to live with our every breath, thought, and step.

the system is broke and its time to fix it with people who do more than relying on votes. the founders warned us and we did not listen. perhaps they never will?

[jeanniedean]

This information and each Representative's response will be published in OpEdNews very soon..." Good idea, huh? At least we'll have a LIST of the bad guys...

Thanks for watching, Monica! Means the world.

--Jeannie

[jeanniedean]

Please call assigned Congressional office and ask for Legislative Aide responsible for election and voting issues. Please get name and email. Introduce yourself and indicate you are calling on behalf of OpEdNews dot Com --a major Internet news service -- currently conducting an important survey of Congressional views on a few key questions relating to voting...

[jeanniedean]

"1. Since our government is based on a system of separate and independent checks and balances, does Representative _______________ believe that our election system, which underlies as well as determines our government, should be based on this same important principle?

2. Would Representative __________like to have DREs (touch-screen voting technology) banned from our elections?

[jeanniedean]

3. Would Representative _____________ support legislation that mandates their banning in time for the 2008 election, if logistically possible?

4. IF answer for question 3 is NO -- Would the Representative support legislation that mandates their banning by 2010?

1-On all "NO" or "undecided" answers, try to follow-up with a WHY? WHY NOT?

2-If possible, add a follow-up: What would be critical factor(s) in determining whether the Congressman/woman could support such legislation or action?..."

[jeanniedean]

Hi, Monica!~Great you should ask. Yes, I believe we do.

Many election activists have been told by Congressional insiders that no one on Capitol Hill would support a bill that calls for a complete ban on electronic, paperless voting machines...

[jeanniedean]

(cont.)...this is spite of the fact that NOT ONE representative has gone on the record, as such, this is a pre-supposed, assumptive, incomplete argument.

Right now, Monica, many of us are calling the offices of our elected officials to ask them the following questions and get their responses on the record re: this critical issue. Here's the rest of the info:

[goodsnservices]

That's not quite true. Congress has decided that it isn't feasible (doable) to replace machines before the next election, due to technical and financial burden reasons. However, they are requiring a paper trail in the next election for any electronic voting machines. The machines will be replaced, just not before the next election. If you vote on e-machines, make damn sure there is a paper printout of your vote AT THE TIME OF YOUR NEXT VOTE.

[monicasuetannehill]

do w still have the power to change this?

[goodsnservices]

Your current congress has decided that since the voting machines can't be replaced before the next election, that paper printouts made at the time the vote is cast will be REQUIRED in all polling places using electronic voting. Curtiss himself states that this is the only way, other than examining the source code BEFORE it is compiled and placed on the machines, to make damn sure the machines aren't rigged.

[monicasuetannehill]

God, I hope you're right. I wonder...let me get back to you on this.