okay guys these creatures are not apes, apes are knuckledraggers only members of the genus homo can wlk upright, orang pendek are remenant populations of austalopthicines, Almastis are neanderthals, the Yeren are survivng populations of homo eretus, and Sasquacht Yeti and the Yowie are unknown species there not giganpithicus cause that was just an overgrown gorrilla
The bigfoot caught on tape is actually fake. There was a cancer sick guy that had been working on the costume for 2 years, he went out and filmed his friend wearing the costume and then sold the tape so he could get money for an operation.
For a simple assumption, perhaps they are small colonies of humans in different countries completely separated from civilization, affected possibly by inbreeding. Their size may also be due to inbreeding, like the wild cats of Australia.
@seymourbbest they can't be as intelligent as us?They know how to stay out of our way. Perhaps they live under ground and they tree peek they're the color of tree bark and slowly peek around the corner to look. If you were covered in tree colored fur and were stealthy and grew up in the woods do you think they couldn't avoid us? We are EXTREMELY noisy in the woods unless we're hunting and even then they pretty much stay still all day until its night time (i assume) so you don't know.
No that's the point they don't have any place in the USA to stay hidden. The US is the most explored country on the planet. Its animals are the most cataloged. We may have some uncharted insects but common sense should tell you we've not somehow missed an 8 foot tall primate.spend some time in the woods. You'll find deer bones.
All that gibberish and no proof. People spend years trying to find elephants to photograph? Huh? Elephants are filmed so much its boring. can't find dead deer? There are millions of deer heads in dens all across the US. Its funny how bigfooters make up obvious lies to try and make their monster babble more credible.
@seymourbbest I made sure to mention that it was forest elephants which were extremely difficult to find and photograph, not just any type of elephant. And what is this nonsense about "dead deer heads in dens all across the US"? What does that have to do with anything? Those deer were hunted and killed. The video is referring to deer that die of natural causes in their habitats. We know there are areas with an overabundance of deer, yet finding a dead deer body in the woods is next to impossible
@MichaelSGoldermann What are the odds of finding a body of an animal that supposedly encompasses thousands of thick and secluded forest across the US? Not to mention these creatures are theorized to live in very relict populations. Obviously you haven't put much thought into such a notion. I'm not saying bigfoot are surely out there, but they certainly have the ability and environments to stay hidden.
the big foot vid is proven fake for one if i was the camra man i would be scared to shit and two it walks straghit back no other ape dose that except use humans
I went to Sumatra, and I saw what I believe was an Orang Pendek. Walking on two feet, about 1.20 metres high...I still can't believe what I saw, it's the most unbelievable thing i've ever seen.
the first video is fake if you look closely at the monkey thing part of his leg suddenly folds and pops out and they proved it was a guy in a costume but i do believe in Bigfoot there are a lot of evidence that he is real and amazing vid.
Even though Cryptozoology is for the most part "pseudo-scientific" I still enjoy reading up on it, and stuff. Its interesting even if its fake, you have to admit that whatever is in those videos real or hoax, its pretty entertaining speculating on what it could be and hearing arguments from believers and skeptics alike.
Bigfoot isn't real it has no characteristics of any animal that is said to be related to which is just absurd, and you really think an animal that is show shy is just gonna non-chalantly stroll away from someone staring at it?? get real... The only cryptid on the video that is believable is The Orang Pendek, there is genuine proof of it, it is most likely the missing link, but will probably never be discovered as those rainforests are so dense there near impossible to get through
I beleive there's ape men like this int he world. I mean look at oliver the chimp, he is VERY human like. For those that don't know what I'm talking about look him up.
They do in fact go through people's trash, many reports of that. And in the winter they either migrate or eat and survive on the same food they always do, deer, water, fish (not eveything's frozen or break it), anything they can find. Same procedure as last year...
the biggest problem with believing in bigfoot is why no clear photos/video now its 20210. the biggest question though is what the hell does an animal this size eat in this area in 'WINTER'? its impossible the things would starve or be forced to rumage in dustbins like bears etc...do! utter shite
u can tell the thing in the patterson film was huge. u couldnt have a suit that fitted that perfect to a persons body. it had long arms with big muscles, look at the butt. its not human
love you videos, and let me tell you, when the music starts back up @ 2:05, MAN!!! you got me ready to go bigfoot searching or something , im loving that....but you did give me a great idea........
It seems real! The creature has breasts and as it walks it looks like it has bare patches sort of the same as an animal that has a bit of mange! If someone made the costume, they really went out of their way to get it right!!
the goverment is just a lie idk if this is true but one of my friends told me that a person he know i think it might have been his uncles friend was that he was hiking and saw a big brown moving object walk down an path then next thing he knew 2 officials were there just saying that they saw an lady in a fur coat. but in the middle of the woods i dont think so
THINK for a second if this thing in the Patterson film is real, more important questions are, who is she? how did she live? how old is she? is she still alive? what was going to her mind when she was filmed.
in the picture at 0:45 has so many little pictures in it if you all look at it very carefully im not sure if it was suppossed to look like that but if you look at the clouds at the right it looks like an alien face and then the rock at the right looks like a monster face and then the rock in the middle it looks like somekind of airship and then there is something at the bottom right of it that's brown and i have no idea what that is suppossed to look like but it looks like some kind of creature
The fossil record shows that there were many upright walking primates that branched off of the human evolution line, so it is a given that they coexisted with humans at some time (neanderthals for example). Whether or not any still exist is up for debate but it is certainly possibly given the vast amounts of unexplored wilderness that still exist on earth. The Patterson film I believe to be fake though..some old guy claimed he was in the suit and I have to admit, he walked just like it!
no he didnt its real, i watched a whole thing on it in school and a proffesional athlete tried to walk the way the bigfoot thing did in the video and they said it was not possible for a human to walk that way
@musicloverrxoxo sum guy did a documentary saying he was the one in the suit and the guy with the camera paid him to wear the suit. he showed the people the exact walk on film and it was confirmed. if that was you.. would you stand there and let the sighting of a lifetime go past you or would you get closer and try to communicate with the animal.
@Nanachick12 hey smarty go give it a try. try to walk the SAME exact way. and if you look closely its not just putting "one foot infront of another" .
@musicloverrxoxo - impossible is it. ive seen other docs and peole have walked exactly how this thing walked. its got bent knees and walks forward. it would uncomfortable but not impossible. Pattersson was on the pay role of a movie studio which made wildlife shows. theres your answer there.also planet of the apes was filmed at that same studio,theres your suit right there
@reptileman778... Yes he did...if you'd like to see his less that amazing recreation watch "Bob Heironimus walks in a BIgfoot suit"...its laughable...AND it was made over 35 years LATER...shouldn't the suit be BETTER than the original...not worse??
You mentioned Patterson made "NO" money from this film due to his Hospital debt?..NOT TRUE.
On November 1st 1967 just 11 days after he made the film Roger and his Lawyer set up the Co. "Bigfoot International" and incorperated all the film rights and infringements (money) to this Co.. Therefore, Roger Patterson was Personally liable for any Debt incurred and not the business "bigfoot International".
The hospitals and Creditors are unable to get judgement on the films money.
I was hoping for a good, HONEST discussion with yorubablk3. Turns out he knows NOTHING about the PGF. That's ok....but then he lied to me and said he read Greg Long's book. How do I know he lied? By the statements he made, such as "Gimlin made no money off the PGF". I even asked hims SIMPLE questions regarding the book that he/she conveniently ignored.
I don't mind a good discussion, but I draw the line when it comes to liars. That's why I terminated our talk.
I find it amazing that all the PGF and Bigfoot believers refuse to read the ONLY book where somebody FINALLY went to Yakima and did the Real foot work on the Facts and talked to the people involved in this Hoax.
IF this "yorubablk3" can't refute the facts of this film, then what's the purpose in debating a person like this who doesn't know the entire story about the PGF....Just a waste a time!
I take it from your sudden silence regarding my questions in relation to Greg Long's book that you do not have the answers and/or you are using search engines right now to find the answer.
You didn't need to lie about reading the book. Most believers like yourself won't. They abandon all critical thinking and reasoning because they have an emotional attachment to this film. It's similiar to religion.
The Patty costume is not a masterpiece... it is a failure.
Not only did the suit not convince the world of its authenticity, but more specifically many people were convinced it was a suit right from the beginning. That has not changed. But the Pattycakes turn reality upside-down. They say it has "withstood the test of time" and remains unbunked. Yet hardly anyone proclaims it to be real. Many if not most people think it looks like a guy walking in a Bigfoot costume.
is take contemporary costume design and a 7ft 400 pound,barral chested person with 16 inch feet and walk seamlessly through a timber/litter strewn river bank
I thought you said you read Mr Perez's 'garbage'- as you put it.He has a list in his 'big foot times' periodical. U(or others) may want to check his website.
We are talking about Greg Long's book. You said it was "full of hodge podge" and that you ehcked it out at your local library.
Yet you cannot answer any of the simple questions I asked......and also you claimed that Gimlin recieved no money from the film...........and yet Greg Long goes over the lawsuit Gimlin filed in detail......
I was answering your assertion that it was a 'money making con'.Now it is true that Mr Patterson was to pay Mr Grimlin and others for the time or use of their equipment.What i was referring to is that the film made 'no' money(meaning not enough to cover all his due bills)
That & the Patterson family medical expenses for Mr Patterson's terminal illness where pressing matters.The Film didn't generate enough to satisfy his creditors. Thus 'no money'.
Actually, YOU are the one promoting the conspiracy theory: you are claiming that Greg Long paid off all of those witnesses, forged court documents, forged movie contracts, faked the film reels, and everything else that points to the film beign a hoax.
That's biggest conspiracy theory I have ever heard of! LOL! Good luck convincing people of that.
I'll go with common sense: that Greg Long did none of the above and that Roger was scamming again. ;)
I'm not trying to 'convince' any one of anything..i tend to accept the Patterson film as depicting a living female of an unclassified bipedal Ape in 1967.If u or others don't? Thats your business.
As for Greg Longs book of 'evidence'? I checked a copy of it out of the local library,& found it's hodge podge tale of sewn together unrelated accusations,postulations assertions,over reaching innuendoes & character assassination,spliced together with copies of out of context court & other records,convoluted,too long,boring & ultimately unconvincing.
His(or your) entire thesis is 'hodge podge'.He(or you)start off with a a preconceived theory(it's a hoax) then cobble together 'evidence' actually directly relevant or not,& try to make it reflect your( or his) overall idea. It didn't work.Not for me.
Parden ME??? wow..You're really interesting..u just might BE Greg Long!You certainly have his arrogant ~'know it all' ~full of unfounded disconnected assertion~character assassination from your rear end ~writing & thinking style.I said i read it.And i did.And i hope that others do to,if they are interested & have the time to waste trudging through its badly written style.
He found out what any one following the accounts found out.that his Patterson's brother in law financed the entire thing as Mr Patterson was essentially (& perennially broke)So what?
7ft, 400 lbs? LOL! Who says that? The subjetc in the film is 6'0-6'2. Gee, that's just happens to be Bob Heironimus's height! Perhaps it is because he wore the costume? Hmmm...
Nope.Bob Heironimus has nothing to do with the height of the Patterson Film subject whose height has been verified time & again independently based on the footprint lengths of the creature both on & off of the film,as well as scale objects still at bluff creek as late as 10 years later.
Did you or did not not lie about reading Greg Long's book?
If you can't be honest with me regarding this then there is no reason to proceed. It is obvious that you have some sort of emotional attachment to this fake film and feel the need to lie to make yourself feel better.
First off...I'm not the one who said that people who don't accept the Patterson film as slam dunk evidence of an uncatalogued primate in north America were 'half wits'
It seems to me the emotional attachments are all on YOUR side.I accept the film.U don't.Neither conclusion renders either of us as 'half wits'.End of story.
May be not to you but It's highly convincing to two or more scientist that has taken the time to examine it,and thousands of others.Both lay & professional.And its highly convincing to me.
Meldrum showed how ignorant he was when started drawing bones on suits. You can't do that. You'll look like an idiot if you do. Also, emldrum recently admitted that he was WRONG for all of these years when he said that "the walk cannot be replicated". LOL!
And how many is that? .0000001% of the World population?
There is nothign to recreate. The apes in "2001" blow away the suit in the PGF....and remember, you haven't seen the suit in the PGF up close....it is all blurry and out of focus, unlike the movie "2001".
The head piece came from Wah Chang for another project. The top was made from a bear suit from Janos that was altered. Janos Prohaska was the guy that was alkways around Corriganville.....you know, the place that Jerry Merritt and Roger Patterson were rebuilding. After a Crash Corrigan sold all of his gorilla suits, a white bigfoot just happened to have been sighted by Roger. Hmmm. And Roger was the same guy who claimed a bigfoot picked up the end of his car. Yeah, right....
What all your assertions are missing is that both the Patterson family AND Mr Grimlin are all alive & here,and niether support you Hodge bodge of character assassination,speculations,assumptions & conspiracy theory.
As for the Patterson creature-just post online a duplicate video of the creature,stature gait,weight and all..until then,all your post amount to static.
I have seen no authentic evidence of any connection between Mr Chambers & Mr Patterson.I have read articles though,that quote Mr chambers ,near the end of his life,saying he was not involved in the Patterson film.
Common sense says it was hoax. His own brother confessed, we have eyewitnesses saying they saw the suit, Roger (a known conman) has been proven to have lied about when the film was shot, refused to tell anyone where it was processed, refused to let anyone see the negative, "lost" reel 3, etc...
Use critical thinking....Roger was pulling a scam. And the suit itself looks bad. Conclusions: HOAX.
Emin:We are repeating.Common sense would be for the brother of the hoax beneficiary,not to expose a hoax that would damage that beneficiary(his own sister)
Again, Al DeAtley said that he "particpated in a hoaxed film years ago."
You also incorrectly stated earlier that Gimlin made no money from this affair. It is obvious to me at this point that yopu have not studied the background behind this hoax.
Uh....Of course Gimlin and Patricia are not going to admit that the film is hoax.
When Gimlin said that he had never been in jail, he was lying. Greg Long checked the Yakima court records. Gimlin then said it must have been a different Gimlin. Again, he was lying. Gimlin's OWN family says that they had to put up their house for his bail. Yeah, he's credible! LOL
But it takes quite a stretch to then posit that a 'con-man'(Patterson) trying to get up a money con(The Film) for his family,would then before dying stiff his partner(Grimlin)thus risking his carefully laid 'con' posthumously...
...and then that the alleged 'cons' beneficiaries brother(DeAltley),in contradiction to the origanal plane, comes out & admits that the whole thing was a con in the first place thus depriving his own sister of any 'benefit' in the end.
That contract with Vilma Radford is what allowed Dahinden to get his hooks in the film. Patricia Patterson's assertion that Mrs. Radford forged Roger's signature so that she would not have to honor the contract didn't wash in court. Patterson and DeAtley lost and had to give Gimlin (and now Dahinden) a percentage of the film's profits (as far as they could be determined by accountants).
Frankly it doesn't take 1/2 a brain to dismiss that conspiracy theory,a theory based on a subjective & selective reading of court testimony(in a trail that wasn't even about the authenticity of the P.Film or its subject).
Plus none of the players,Patterson(Roger or Patricia)Mr Grimlin,Mr DeAtley or Mr Chambers have said or attested to anything that you have alleged in the manner that u have posted.
DeAtley has admitted that the film is bogus. No argument there. Gimlin couldn't confess now even if he wanted to: that would be admitting to FRAUD. Patricia says about the film," do what you want, as long as it doesn't interfere with my money." She also will not say the film is legit.
As for Chambers, he DID talk about with his friends.
Don't believe a hoaxer....that's how cons work! ;)
Mr Patterson is long dead.The other person objectively proven to have been there supports the truth of it and niether Mrs Patterson or her brother have contradicted this.
Want more? Today Bigfoot researcher Larry Lund has tried his best to tell people that the "first known recording of a Bigfoot scream in Washington" is actually Patterson yelling in a bucket using Merritt's equipment. Yet every documentary and CD of Bigfoot yells has this noise on it. It's amazing. Yet since then its fame has grown all out of proportion.
Somebody oughta' sell tickets. Wait. They have and still are. ;)
All Larry Lund and anyone else has to do is yell into a bucket with the circa contemporary equipment.Until then,silence is a better reward then flapping there gums and proving themselves to be a fool.
While a premeditated con and bad credit or lapse business practices ,are not good things, they are not interchangeable. And they are not the 'same'thing.
Now ,if YOU wish not to believe them,fine.But don't selectively twist what they said in testimony in a trail that had NOTHING to do with the authenticity of the 'subject' of the Patterson film,but only about payments & equipment surrounding the making of the film(the Greg Long tactic)
That is silly. When a witness testafies in a court of law, his/her credibility is called into question.
Patterson has no credibility. Neither does Gimlin. Patterson ripped off everyone from Safeway to the hospitals that treated him for cancer. You can't argue against this: the creedit reports prove it. Also look at the Radford's movie contract: Roger never paid back a dime.
He was a conman. Nothing you say will change that.
PATTERSON LIED--When he claimed to be "sitting at his campsite at Ape Canyon". He wasn't.Jerry Merritt's own sister took that photo across the street from Patterson's home.When he's holding his casts in what is claimed to be part of "the second roll" taken right after making them he has to be lying. When he told HODGSON he'd just gotten back from Eureka after sending the film off FROM THE POST OFFICE,he's lying. It didn't happen because it is physically impossible to have happened.
emin:And word to the wise-Believe what u want,but before you embark on or sign onto a highly selective/slanted case of character assassination of a dead person,make sure you've never lied or missed a payment on your credit card bills,or scrambled to try & prolong your life,or die with less distress with no health insurance,Ok?Ok.
I think they are new humans adapting to are world
superbasedanny 2 weeks ago
if you think about it humans only inhabit 10% of the earth so 90% is all wilderness plenty of room for unknown creatures.
300spartansrule 1 month ago in playlist More videos from MichaelSGoldermann
@300spartansrule only 1% might be The Unknown creature or non existant creature Am I right because the 89% might be a common in many kind of animal
ceejay944 3 weeks ago in playlist More videos from MichaelSGoldermann
@nozpewpew no actually your wrong the guy who filmed this is still alive and was interviewed by many people and did not have cancer.
TheFirstdjsteels 1 month ago
Okay I'm a know it all....
desert2012warrior 1 month ago
okay guys these creatures are not apes, apes are knuckledraggers only members of the genus homo can wlk upright, orang pendek are remenant populations of austalopthicines, Almastis are neanderthals, the Yeren are survivng populations of homo eretus, and Sasquacht Yeti and the Yowie are unknown species there not giganpithicus cause that was just an overgrown gorrilla
camau79 1 month ago
The bigfoot caught on tape is actually fake. There was a cancer sick guy that had been working on the costume for 2 years, he went out and filmed his friend wearing the costume and then sold the tape so he could get money for an operation.
nozpewpew 2 months ago in playlist Fler videoklipp från MichaelSGoldermann
For a simple assumption, perhaps they are small colonies of humans in different countries completely separated from civilization, affected possibly by inbreeding. Their size may also be due to inbreeding, like the wild cats of Australia.
darkheart1998 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Get the book "Ash Gray: Stay out of the Rockies!"
Excellent thriller novel about this monster!
ISBN: 9781463430627
Available at Authorhouse website
Barnes & Noble
Amazon
SuperJohnnybandit 5 months ago
@seymourbbest they can't be as intelligent as us?They know how to stay out of our way. Perhaps they live under ground and they tree peek they're the color of tree bark and slowly peek around the corner to look. If you were covered in tree colored fur and were stealthy and grew up in the woods do you think they couldn't avoid us? We are EXTREMELY noisy in the woods unless we're hunting and even then they pretty much stay still all day until its night time (i assume) so you don't know.
raidersfootball20 5 months ago
Sadly your video evidence was proved fake so bad look.
Jakehank0 6 months ago
Is It Real checked it, they say it is real
ChapsLB 6 months ago
No that's the point they don't have any place in the USA to stay hidden. The US is the most explored country on the planet. Its animals are the most cataloged. We may have some uncharted insects but common sense should tell you we've not somehow missed an 8 foot tall primate.spend some time in the woods. You'll find deer bones.
seymourbbest 6 months ago
All that gibberish and no proof. People spend years trying to find elephants to photograph? Huh? Elephants are filmed so much its boring. can't find dead deer? There are millions of deer heads in dens all across the US. Its funny how bigfooters make up obvious lies to try and make their monster babble more credible.
seymourbbest 6 months ago
@seymourbbest I made sure to mention that it was forest elephants which were extremely difficult to find and photograph, not just any type of elephant. And what is this nonsense about "dead deer heads in dens all across the US"? What does that have to do with anything? Those deer were hunted and killed. The video is referring to deer that die of natural causes in their habitats. We know there are areas with an overabundance of deer, yet finding a dead deer body in the woods is next to impossible
MichaelSGoldermann 6 months ago 3
@MichaelSGoldermann What are the odds of finding a body of an animal that supposedly encompasses thousands of thick and secluded forest across the US? Not to mention these creatures are theorized to live in very relict populations. Obviously you haven't put much thought into such a notion. I'm not saying bigfoot are surely out there, but they certainly have the ability and environments to stay hidden.
MichaelSGoldermann 6 months ago
Planet Of The Ape's Anyone?
SuperGoldenGlory2001 6 months ago
Never proven fake, no.
komodoman 6 months ago
the big foot vid is proven fake for one if i was the camra man i would be scared to shit and two it walks straghit back no other ape dose that except use humans
sparkyanddanny 7 months ago
I went to Sumatra, and I saw what I believe was an Orang Pendek. Walking on two feet, about 1.20 metres high...I still can't believe what I saw, it's the most unbelievable thing i've ever seen.
HBvideoproductions 7 months ago
fade ?
victorian1998 7 months ago
musicloverrxoxo is right no could do that walk
SuperHockeyplayer19 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this dude who was showing him in this video was human in fake ape sute
kristjan830 8 months ago
this dude who was showing him in this video was huma in fake ape sute
kristjan830 8 months ago
@kristjan830 no look at the hip he does not walk like people
bakuganmasterdude 7 months ago
wat is the name of the song that is playing
lawman977 8 months ago
the first video is fake if you look closely at the monkey thing part of his leg suddenly folds and pops out and they proved it was a guy in a costume but i do believe in Bigfoot there are a lot of evidence that he is real and amazing vid.
77PurpleLink77 9 months ago
Well I don't believe the best evidence but I think these apes do exist but not going out in daytime I think there to smart to do that.
mischellewright69 9 months ago
2:37- o.j simpson!!?
SEABrownPower 9 months ago
you should re do these and get a pc headset so you can narrate over the images and stuff about your feelings and belife of these things
ChuWanggAmes 10 months ago
You forgot the skunk ape and the monkeyman.
SmokebuoyII 10 months ago
The last video shown is Bear Gryylls from man vs wild
TheDANGles9 10 months ago
is it just me or does 'big foot' walk strangely the same as a human?
scotrose17 10 months ago
@musicloverrxoxo what do u mean?
jetprimetrujillo 10 months ago
Even though Cryptozoology is for the most part "pseudo-scientific" I still enjoy reading up on it, and stuff. Its interesting even if its fake, you have to admit that whatever is in those videos real or hoax, its pretty entertaining speculating on what it could be and hearing arguments from believers and skeptics alike.
desertninja3 10 months ago
Cryptozoology novel about two boys who find something strange on the beach one night see video book trailer
dltanner99 10 months ago
Bigfoot isn't real it has no characteristics of any animal that is said to be related to which is just absurd, and you really think an animal that is show shy is just gonna non-chalantly stroll away from someone staring at it?? get real... The only cryptid on the video that is believable is The Orang Pendek, there is genuine proof of it, it is most likely the missing link, but will probably never be discovered as those rainforests are so dense there near impossible to get through
danathor99 11 months ago
0:17 KILL THAT MOTHERFUCKER!
Fooksalt 1 year ago
Good video...this is something that has always interested me...the paranormal in general. What is the name of this song?
DJH8808 1 year ago
pause 0:18 you can clearly see breasts that is not a costume
demacksful 1 year ago
OMGore, hairy people do exist! O.O
titodelibero 1 year ago
Any carcasses that are found are transported to Bermuda triangle to be teleported to mars, didn't you know?
Thunderdome616 1 year ago 3
Nice batman music.
CyFiM 1 year ago
Some of those videos could just be a guy in a gorilla costume walking through the forest.
pgoodison 1 year ago
I beleive there's ape men like this int he world. I mean look at oliver the chimp, he is VERY human like. For those that don't know what I'm talking about look him up.
KBS604 1 year ago
Bigfoot, keeping it real
gothamjediknight 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm still waiting.
digglyda 1 year ago
Look in the patterson footage, you can see the thigh moving!!! You'd have to have a pretty fucken good suit to do that!!!
bigfootisreal100 1 year ago
They do in fact go through people's trash, many reports of that. And in the winter they either migrate or eat and survive on the same food they always do, deer, water, fish (not eveything's frozen or break it), anything they can find. Same procedure as last year...
komodoman 1 year ago
the biggest problem with believing in bigfoot is why no clear photos/video now its 20210. the biggest question though is what the hell does an animal this size eat in this area in 'WINTER'? its impossible the things would starve or be forced to rumage in dustbins like bears etc...do! utter shite
ronyeats 1 year ago
u can tell the thing in the patterson film was huge. u couldnt have a suit that fitted that perfect to a persons body. it had long arms with big muscles, look at the butt. its not human
animalman1122 1 year ago 2
guys is this bigfoot or a evolution of apes if it is bigfoot is it really more of them if there is the world is in trouble
meacbulldogs101 1 year ago
fuck its just scary to know that theres things out there
23RAIDa 1 year ago
awesome song.
Airsoftman67 1 year ago
love you videos, and let me tell you, when the music starts back up @ 2:05, MAN!!! you got me ready to go bigfoot searching or something , im loving that....but you did give me a great idea........
slappinyaface 1 year ago
i so beileve in bigfoot or to me its sasquatch
spartanhaloboy112 1 year ago
Great video man!
dvspro123 1 year ago
It seems real! The creature has breasts and as it walks it looks like it has bare patches sort of the same as an animal that has a bit of mange! If someone made the costume, they really went out of their way to get it right!!
nestlemarie 1 year ago
WOW! This is awesome footage!!
This is trully fascinating .... the legend of Bigfoot!!
BrooksDiamond 1 year ago
its all fake i watched the video in nat geo adventures and its fake FAKE FAKE
runekenamy 1 year ago
the goverment is just a lie idk if this is true but one of my friends told me that a person he know i think it might have been his uncles friend was that he was hiking and saw a big brown moving object walk down an path then next thing he knew 2 officials were there just saying that they saw an lady in a fur coat. but in the middle of the woods i dont think so
sirjogs 1 year ago
I Watched This In Skool Today It Looks Fake But When My Teacher Explained It Made Sense
gapugo98 1 year ago
dah bigfoots are endangered maybe elaphants
sweetreymysterio1 1 year ago
THINK for a second if this thing in the Patterson film is real, more important questions are, who is she? how did she live? how old is she? is she still alive? what was going to her mind when she was filmed.
rhmkaiba 1 year ago
dude its fake because i saw hes foot it looks like a costume
gonzalo726 1 year ago
Asian countries also have a flying child-eating ape known as orang bati.
tracefleeman 1 year ago
What is the video at the very end? I've been looking everywhere for it but I don't know the name.
ebilnerd 1 year ago
@ebilnerd They showed it on "Fact or Fake: Paranormal Files" the tv show. It's a fake
marbolacany 10 months ago
Wait, big foot looked at the camera, wouldnt he have ran at him?
Rockerboyzrockz50 1 year ago
@Rockerboyzrockz50 Maybe he isn't aggressive, he doesn't know what a camera is...
HitByADodgeTruck 1 year ago
i love the Vesperstilio, or whatever, song from Batman Begins
soufang 1 year ago
/facepalm
nvshd 1 year ago
Great video. Although I've gotta admit, I was expecting Bigfoot to grab someone at the climax of the music and say "I'm Bigfootman!"
TheDeadEnd18 1 year ago
do you ever notice that when someone takes a vid or pic of a cryptid, its always bad quality..............?
speedpianomaster 1 year ago
I'm no scientist, but that looks very much like a costume to me.
metaregina 1 year ago
Thats a big coat he's got on...
zpwner11 1 year ago
in the picture at 0:45 has so many little pictures in it if you all look at it very carefully im not sure if it was suppossed to look like that but if you look at the clouds at the right it looks like an alien face and then the rock at the right looks like a monster face and then the rock in the middle it looks like somekind of airship and then there is something at the bottom right of it that's brown and i have no idea what that is suppossed to look like but it looks like some kind of creature
Alo42424 1 year ago
the illuminati is winning the war, dont tell the people the truth thats wat they want
Shorty140love 1 year ago
The fossil record shows that there were many upright walking primates that branched off of the human evolution line, so it is a given that they coexisted with humans at some time (neanderthals for example). Whether or not any still exist is up for debate but it is certainly possibly given the vast amounts of unexplored wilderness that still exist on earth. The Patterson film I believe to be fake though..some old guy claimed he was in the suit and I have to admit, he walked just like it!
ThePopeII 1 year ago
the video at the beginning is fake, a guy confessed he was in the monkey suit.
reptileman778 2 years ago
no he didnt its real, i watched a whole thing on it in school and a proffesional athlete tried to walk the way the bigfoot thing did in the video and they said it was not possible for a human to walk that way
musicloverrxoxo 2 years ago 10
@musicloverrxoxo sum guy did a documentary saying he was the one in the suit and the guy with the camera paid him to wear the suit. he showed the people the exact walk on film and it was confirmed. if that was you.. would you stand there and let the sighting of a lifetime go past you or would you get closer and try to communicate with the animal.
TerrisJ3 1 year ago
@musicloverrxoxo A profesional athlete couldn't walk by putting one foot in front of the other?
Nanachick12 1 year ago
@Nanachick12 hey smarty go give it a try. try to walk the SAME exact way. and if you look closely its not just putting "one foot infront of another" .
musicloverrxoxo 1 year ago
@musicloverrxoxo - impossible is it. ive seen other docs and peole have walked exactly how this thing walked. its got bent knees and walks forward. it would uncomfortable but not impossible. Pattersson was on the pay role of a movie studio which made wildlife shows. theres your answer there.also planet of the apes was filmed at that same studio,theres your suit right there
ronyeats 1 year ago
@ronyeats i could reaaly care less about this. we have bigger issues going on than debating whether figgen big foot is real or not. idgas anymore
musicloverrxoxo 1 year ago
@musicloverrxoxo It's impossible to walk with one foot infront of the other?? IN THAT CASE, I MUST BE SOME FORM OF SUPERHUMAN GOD.
Creakii 1 year ago 8
@Creakii well then mr sarcasm..........
musicloverrxoxo 1 year ago
@reptileman778... Yes he did...if you'd like to see his less that amazing recreation watch "Bob Heironimus walks in a BIgfoot suit"...its laughable...AND it was made over 35 years LATER...shouldn't the suit be BETTER than the original...not worse??
joeyvader 1 year ago
@yorubablk3
You mentioned Patterson made "NO" money from this film due to his Hospital debt?..NOT TRUE.
On November 1st 1967 just 11 days after he made the film Roger and his Lawyer set up the Co. "Bigfoot International" and incorperated all the film rights and infringements (money) to this Co.. Therefore, Roger Patterson was Personally liable for any Debt incurred and not the business "bigfoot International".
The hospitals and Creditors are unable to get judgement on the films money.
ALLENMUSKY 2 years ago
@ALLENMUSKY
I was hoping for a good, HONEST discussion with yorubablk3. Turns out he knows NOTHING about the PGF. That's ok....but then he lied to me and said he read Greg Long's book. How do I know he lied? By the statements he made, such as "Gimlin made no money off the PGF". I even asked hims SIMPLE questions regarding the book that he/she conveniently ignored.
I don't mind a good discussion, but I draw the line when it comes to liars. That's why I terminated our talk.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
@Emin
I find it amazing that all the PGF and Bigfoot believers refuse to read the ONLY book where somebody FINALLY went to Yakima and did the Real foot work on the Facts and talked to the people involved in this Hoax.
IF this "yorubablk3" can't refute the facts of this film, then what's the purpose in debating a person like this who doesn't know the entire story about the PGF....Just a waste a time!
ALLENMUSKY 2 years ago
yorubablk3 -
Anyway, READ the book and then get back with me.
Don't take the word of the haters out there....they haven't read the book either, based on their postings.
Until then.....
eminboztepe 2 years ago
yorubablk3 -
I take it from your sudden silence regarding my questions in relation to Greg Long's book that you do not have the answers and/or you are using search engines right now to find the answer.
You didn't need to lie about reading the book. Most believers like yourself won't. They abandon all critical thinking and reasoning because they have an emotional attachment to this film. It's similiar to religion.
Good day and good luck!
eminboztepe 2 years ago
The Patty costume is not a masterpiece... it is a failure.
Not only did the suit not convince the world of its authenticity, but more specifically many people were convinced it was a suit right from the beginning. That has not changed. But the Pattycakes turn reality upside-down. They say it has "withstood the test of time" and remains unbunked. Yet hardly anyone proclaims it to be real. Many if not most people think it looks like a guy walking in a Bigfoot costume.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Emin:All anyone has to do is
yorubablk3 2 years ago
is take contemporary costume design and a 7ft 400 pound,barral chested person with 16 inch feet and walk seamlessly through a timber/litter strewn river bank
yorubablk3 2 years ago
Case in point.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
It hasn't been successfully duplicated yet.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Uh...name one person who has tried to duplicate it.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
I thought you said you read Mr Perez's 'garbage'- as you put it.He has a list in his 'big foot times' periodical. U(or others) may want to check his website.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
We are talking about Greg Long's book. You said it was "full of hodge podge" and that you ehcked it out at your local library.
Yet you cannot answer any of the simple questions I asked......and also you claimed that Gimlin recieved no money from the film...........and yet Greg Long goes over the lawsuit Gimlin filed in detail......
Did you lie about that?
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Yes,i read it as soon as it came to the library.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
And yet you said that Gimlin made no money off the film.
Sorry, but that proves you didn't...or that skipped over several entire chapters.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
I was answering your assertion that it was a 'money making con'.Now it is true that Mr Patterson was to pay Mr Grimlin and others for the time or use of their equipment.What i was referring to is that the film made 'no' money(meaning not enough to cover all his due bills)
yorubablk3 2 years ago
That & the Patterson family medical expenses for Mr Patterson's terminal illness where pressing matters.The Film didn't generate enough to satisfy his creditors. Thus 'no money'.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
And as for your Greg long inspired conspiracy theory,its just that.A conspiracy theory.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Actually, YOU are the one promoting the conspiracy theory: you are claiming that Greg Long paid off all of those witnesses, forged court documents, forged movie contracts, faked the film reels, and everything else that points to the film beign a hoax.
That's biggest conspiracy theory I have ever heard of! LOL! Good luck convincing people of that.
I'll go with common sense: that Greg Long did none of the above and that Roger was scamming again. ;)
eminboztepe 2 years ago
I'm not trying to 'convince' any one of anything..i tend to accept the Patterson film as depicting a living female of an unclassified bipedal Ape in 1967.If u or others don't? Thats your business.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
And I (along with the rest of the scientific community) accept the Patterson film as a crude hoax of a man wearing a bad fur suit.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
As for Greg Longs book of 'evidence'? I checked a copy of it out of the local library,& found it's hodge podge tale of sewn together unrelated accusations,postulations assertions,over reaching innuendoes & character assassination,spliced together with copies of out of context court & other records,convoluted,too long,boring & ultimately unconvincing.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Oh really? Tell me one thing in Long's book that is "hodge podge".
Tell me what he said about Pat Mason. Or tell me what he found about Ron Olson of ANE.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
His(or your) entire thesis is 'hodge podge'.He(or you)start off with a a preconceived theory(it's a hoax) then cobble together 'evidence' actually directly relevant or not,& try to make it reflect your( or his) overall idea. It didn't work.Not for me.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
You lied about reading the book.
Which means you had no interest in investigating the truth. This is my final post on this.
If anyone ELSE wants to discuss this hoax (and actually be HONEST in doing so) feel free to message me.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Parden ME??? wow..You're really interesting..u just might BE Greg Long!You certainly have his arrogant ~'know it all' ~full of unfounded disconnected assertion~character assassination from your rear end ~writing & thinking style.I said i read it.And i did.And i hope that others do to,if they are interested & have the time to waste trudging through its badly written style.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
If you really read the book, tell me what Long found out about DeAtley's funding of the promotional film regarding the PGF.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
He found out what any one following the accounts found out.that his Patterson's brother in law financed the entire thing as Mr Patterson was essentially (& perennially broke)So what?
yorubablk3 2 years ago
O! and if YOU are Greg Long or a loved one of his..sorry,i couldn't buy what you-or he- was selling.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Answer any of the questions I asked about the book please. 0-)
eminboztepe 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
I'm waiting....answer any of the questions I asked about the book.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
7ft, 400 lbs? LOL! Who says that? The subjetc in the film is 6'0-6'2. Gee, that's just happens to be Bob Heironimus's height! Perhaps it is because he wore the costume? Hmmm...
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Nope.Bob Heironimus has nothing to do with the height of the Patterson Film subject whose height has been verified time & again independently based on the footprint lengths of the creature both on & off of the film,as well as scale objects still at bluff creek as late as 10 years later.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Did you or did not not lie about reading Greg Long's book?
If you can't be honest with me regarding this then there is no reason to proceed. It is obvious that you have some sort of emotional attachment to this fake film and feel the need to lie to make yourself feel better.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
lol..wow..just wow.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
'you have some sort of emotional attachment to this fake film and feel the need to LIE" ok..its official ..This... is getting weird!..
yorubablk3 2 years ago
First off...I'm not the one who said that people who don't accept the Patterson film as slam dunk evidence of an uncatalogued primate in north America were 'half wits'
yorubablk3 2 years ago
..or start an open ended 'defense' of Greg Long's silly book.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
It seems to me the emotional attachments are all on YOUR side.I accept the film.U don't.Neither conclusion renders either of us as 'half wits'.End of story.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
May be not to you but It's highly convincing to two or more scientist that has taken the time to examine it,and thousands of others.Both lay & professional.And its highly convincing to me.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Don't know of any scientists that believe in it, except Meldrum, who is the same guy who says that the "Garden of Eden" was located in America. LOL!
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Both scientist share the same religious faith.And so what?
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Meldrum showed how ignorant he was when started drawing bones on suits. You can't do that. You'll look like an idiot if you do. Also, emldrum recently admitted that he was WRONG for all of these years when he said that "the walk cannot be replicated". LOL!
eminboztepe 2 years ago
And once again..then a simply have a guy in a suit do it again,successfully.'Cause they haven't done it in the past 43 years.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
That's because no one is clamoring for this to be done.
Find me one of those old technochrome grade stock films and I'll try it myself...oh wait, they don't make those anymore. ;)
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Oh contrer!Many in the BF community have been clamoring for 40 years.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
And how many is that? .0000001% of the World population?
There is nothign to recreate. The apes in "2001" blow away the suit in the PGF....and remember, you haven't seen the suit in the PGF up close....it is all blurry and out of focus, unlike the movie "2001".
eminboztepe 2 years ago
The head piece came from Wah Chang for another project. The top was made from a bear suit from Janos that was altered. Janos Prohaska was the guy that was alkways around Corriganville.....you know, the place that Jerry Merritt and Roger Patterson were rebuilding. After a Crash Corrigan sold all of his gorilla suits, a white bigfoot just happened to have been sighted by Roger. Hmmm. And Roger was the same guy who claimed a bigfoot picked up the end of his car. Yeah, right....
eminboztepe 2 years ago
What all your assertions are missing is that both the Patterson family AND Mr Grimlin are all alive & here,and niether support you Hodge bodge of character assassination,speculations,assumptions & conspiracy theory.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
As for the Patterson creature-just post online a duplicate video of the creature,stature gait,weight and all..until then,all your post amount to static.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
I don't know how to make videos. If YOU do, feel free to post the documentation. I won't mind one bit.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
No conspiracy theory needed....Patterson was dying of cancer and wanted to leave something for his wife. Chambers thought that was ok. End of story.
Al DeAtley confessed it was hoax. Isn't that enough?
eminboztepe 2 years ago
I have seen no authentic evidence of any connection between Mr Chambers & Mr Patterson.I have read articles though,that quote Mr chambers ,near the end of his life,saying he was not involved in the Patterson film.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
And emin:Use a little common sense here.If you don't believe that the film shows an authentic creature,fine.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Common sense says it was hoax. His own brother confessed, we have eyewitnesses saying they saw the suit, Roger (a known conman) has been proven to have lied about when the film was shot, refused to tell anyone where it was processed, refused to let anyone see the negative, "lost" reel 3, etc...
Use critical thinking....Roger was pulling a scam. And the suit itself looks bad. Conclusions: HOAX.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Emin:We are repeating.Common sense would be for the brother of the hoax beneficiary,not to expose a hoax that would damage that beneficiary(his own sister)
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Again, Al DeAtley said that he "particpated in a hoaxed film years ago."
You also incorrectly stated earlier that Gimlin made no money from this affair. It is obvious to me at this point that yopu have not studied the background behind this hoax.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Mr Grimlin & Patricia Patterson are living and they disagree with your assertions.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Uh....Of course Gimlin and Patricia are not going to admit that the film is hoax.
When Gimlin said that he had never been in jail, he was lying. Greg Long checked the Yakima court records. Gimlin then said it must have been a different Gimlin. Again, he was lying. Gimlin's OWN family says that they had to put up their house for his bail. Yeah, he's credible! LOL
eminboztepe 2 years ago
But it takes quite a stretch to then posit that a 'con-man'(Patterson) trying to get up a money con(The Film) for his family,would then before dying stiff his partner(Grimlin)thus risking his carefully laid 'con' posthumously...
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Patterson's credit record shows he ripped off everyone.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
...and then that the alleged 'cons' beneficiaries brother(DeAltley),in contradiction to the origanal plane, comes out & admits that the whole thing was a con in the first place thus depriving his own sister of any 'benefit' in the end.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
That contract with Vilma Radford is what allowed Dahinden to get his hooks in the film. Patricia Patterson's assertion that Mrs. Radford forged Roger's signature so that she would not have to honor the contract didn't wash in court. Patterson and DeAtley lost and had to give Gimlin (and now Dahinden) a percentage of the film's profits (as far as they could be determined by accountants).
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Frankly it doesn't take 1/2 a brain to dismiss that conspiracy theory,a theory based on a subjective & selective reading of court testimony(in a trail that wasn't even about the authenticity of the P.Film or its subject).
yorubablk3 2 years ago
Plus none of the players,Patterson(Roger or Patricia)Mr Grimlin,Mr DeAtley or Mr Chambers have said or attested to anything that you have alleged in the manner that u have posted.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
DeAtley has admitted that the film is bogus. No argument there. Gimlin couldn't confess now even if he wanted to: that would be admitting to FRAUD. Patricia says about the film," do what you want, as long as it doesn't interfere with my money." She also will not say the film is legit.
As for Chambers, he DID talk about with his friends.
Don't believe a hoaxer....that's how cons work! ;)
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Mr DeAtley NEVER 'admited' that the film was bogus!If he did 'he' would be admitting to FRAUD,plus why would he want to defraud his sister?
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Al DeAtley said that he "participated in a hoaxed film years ago".
Do the math.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Mr Patterson is long dead.The other person objectively proven to have been there supports the truth of it and niether Mrs Patterson or her brother have contradicted this.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Want more? Today Bigfoot researcher Larry Lund has tried his best to tell people that the "first known recording of a Bigfoot scream in Washington" is actually Patterson yelling in a bucket using Merritt's equipment. Yet every documentary and CD of Bigfoot yells has this noise on it. It's amazing. Yet since then its fame has grown all out of proportion.
Somebody oughta' sell tickets. Wait. They have and still are. ;)
eminboztepe 2 years ago
All Larry Lund and anyone else has to do is yell into a bucket with the circa contemporary equipment.Until then,silence is a better reward then flapping there gums and proving themselves to be a fool.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
The point was that this was another example of Patterson pulling a con.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
While a premeditated con and bad credit or lapse business practices ,are not good things, they are not interchangeable. And they are not the 'same'thing.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Having a history of committing hoaxes and ripping people off ruins one's credibility. I don't see how you can argue against this.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Now ,if YOU wish not to believe them,fine.But don't selectively twist what they said in testimony in a trail that had NOTHING to do with the authenticity of the 'subject' of the Patterson film,but only about payments & equipment surrounding the making of the film(the Greg Long tactic)
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
That is silly. When a witness testafies in a court of law, his/her credibility is called into question.
Patterson has no credibility. Neither does Gimlin. Patterson ripped off everyone from Safeway to the hospitals that treated him for cancer. You can't argue against this: the creedit reports prove it. Also look at the Radford's movie contract: Roger never paid back a dime.
He was a conman. Nothing you say will change that.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
lol -'he was a conman.Nothing you say will change that'.- wow you just sound like a jilted lover!lol
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Really? Good one! LOL
eminboztepe 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
PATTERSON LIED--When he claimed to be "sitting at his campsite at Ape Canyon". He wasn't.Jerry Merritt's own sister took that photo across the street from Patterson's home.When he's holding his casts in what is claimed to be part of "the second roll" taken right after making them he has to be lying. When he told HODGSON he'd just gotten back from Eureka after sending the film off FROM THE POST OFFICE,he's lying. It didn't happen because it is physically impossible to have happened.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
emin:And word to the wise-Believe what u want,but before you embark on or sign onto a highly selective/slanted case of character assassination of a dead person,make sure you've never lied or missed a payment on your credit card bills,or scrambled to try & prolong your life,or die with less distress with no health insurance,Ok?Ok.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Say what you want, but someone who has a history of ripping people off DOES slander one's credibility.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Well,any one who takes on the task of character assassination of dead people better live a very 'saintly ' life themselves.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Irrelevant. Example: Doc Shiels admitted to faking all of his sea monster photos.
So, would you believe any more photos of sea monsters by him? OF course not. And neither should we regarding Patterson.
eminboztepe 2 years ago
Mud rucking can be a dirty business.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
Be careful.
yorubablk3 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Be careful of what?
eminboztepe 2 years ago
@yorubablk3
Be careful of what????
eminboztepe 2 years ago
The stirrer of sh*t tends to get splattered themselves.