The fight to Defend Rural America has now shifted to four Klamath River dams. Watch THE FIGHT TO SAVE SISKIYOU COUNTY for first-hand accounts from the people that will be directly affected.
Speaking as an engineering and someone who has actually talked with the engineers and scientists involved with this project, the people who post here making statements without a even a small bit of knowledge on the subject are just making fools out of themselves. Anyways, the main reason why the engineers decided to release the all at once is because if they were to slowly release slow enough that the turbidity and force didn't kill fish or alter the landscape, the project would drag on for yea
Mother Nature does not 'clean up' man's mess in a year and return it to a pristine state. Look at the rivers that come off of Mt. St. Helens and see how many of them are pristine 30 years after the blast. I'd love to see this area after the first major rain storm, or better yet, during next spring's thaw. Seeing how much mud and muck sluffs into the stream from the sides is a good indication of what will be happening for many years to come.
Yuck! Always imagined a pristine bottom on a pretty lake. But this sharp canyon full of oozing slime and mud is just gross. What will this look like in a year? Will rains wash that mud away? Will it dry out and grow plants? Will they actively clean it...or re-shape the canyon?
I wonder how many fish died because of the heavy sediment in the water downstream. Also, don't salmon return to their spawning grounds? If the last time they spawned up stream was 60 years ago then why would they go any further past the dam? Why would we destroy a dam that was producing power? So we can become more dependent on coal or petroleum products? I believe dams are a lesser of all evils. On the other hand there is more power on the Columbia than we can even deal with.
@pinotfilmnoir Some fish definitely died and I'm sure some of the prime spawning gravel beds were covered up. However, in the long run this would benefit the salmon as they gain access to more spawning sites. They do return to their spawning grounds, they are in the river in which they were born. It doesn't mean they go to the exact same location in the river when they were frys. As for the production of power, this dam was built in 1913... Look at the size of the reservoir, it's a joke.
Just so you all know, the dam produced about 14.7 MW of power. That's equivalent to about 10 windmills, or in layman's terms "jack diddly." When removing a dam there are a lot of considerations and stake holders. It's not only "progressive" areas, what ever that means.
@buck6233 Big M little m, big difference! Lol, lol! Dipshit. What's that about being presumed a fool? Maybe you should learn the difference between capital and lower case letters before you start randomly talking smack to people. You never know who you're talking to on the internets!
Awesome news, only the most progressive corners of the country are actively deconstructing dams. It's a sign that we can reverse destructive practices.
What is that structure at the bottom of the lake? Is that like remnants of an old cofferdam or something used during construction of the original dam?
@spdwebdotnet i bet it was from the original construction. funny someone else noticed that, i thought it was so cool when i saw it at 2:41. interesting how things like that are preserved for so long.
Great news for the Salmon, and indirectly for people. Where would we be without Salmon? Maybe they won't go extinct now that they will have their breeding grounds given back to them. This brought tears to my eyes, knowing life has been given back to a river.
@AaleciaA Ahhhahahaha I think the term you were looking for is... 'revolve around'. Lol the library is 'dat-a-way! Ahhhahahahaha :) how does that saying go? It's better to keep your mouth shut, and be presumed a fool, than to open it, and remove all doubt. Dig? Lol
So the cost for a federally mandated fish spillway would have been $100M...? Did I hear that right? So rather than do that, they decided to tear it down. So where will the power come from now to service the 7000 residents?
Perhaps the better question is: Will there still be so much concern for spawning salmon when unemployment reaches 30%...?
@CCMochi, You shouldn't comment on topics you don't know anything about. This dam and the others recently taken out in the region were old, inefficient and their continued operation was not in the interest of rate payers. Also, the dam fed into the Western power grid, it did not directly provide power to a local community. Lastly, sport fishing employs 31,000 people in OR &WA where are they going to work without them.
Ahhhhhahahaha Judging from the majority of comments here... Lol All hail the public school system!!! Ahhahahaha
buck6233 1 week ago
So the sediments won't be an issue?
CamiloSanchez1979 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The fight to Defend Rural America has now shifted to four Klamath River dams. Watch THE FIGHT TO SAVE SISKIYOU COUNTY for first-hand accounts from the people that will be directly affected.
SilentNoMorePubs 4 months ago
Speaking as an engineering and someone who has actually talked with the engineers and scientists involved with this project, the people who post here making statements without a even a small bit of knowledge on the subject are just making fools out of themselves. Anyways, the main reason why the engineers decided to release the all at once is because if they were to slowly release slow enough that the turbidity and force didn't kill fish or alter the landscape, the project would drag on for yea
laxman2527 4 months ago
Mother Nature does not 'clean up' man's mess in a year and return it to a pristine state. Look at the rivers that come off of Mt. St. Helens and see how many of them are pristine 30 years after the blast. I'd love to see this area after the first major rain storm, or better yet, during next spring's thaw. Seeing how much mud and muck sluffs into the stream from the sides is a good indication of what will be happening for many years to come.
Woody615 4 months ago
Yuck! Always imagined a pristine bottom on a pretty lake. But this sharp canyon full of oozing slime and mud is just gross. What will this look like in a year? Will rains wash that mud away? Will it dry out and grow plants? Will they actively clean it...or re-shape the canyon?
cember01 4 months ago
I wonder how many fish died because of the heavy sediment in the water downstream. Also, don't salmon return to their spawning grounds? If the last time they spawned up stream was 60 years ago then why would they go any further past the dam? Why would we destroy a dam that was producing power? So we can become more dependent on coal or petroleum products? I believe dams are a lesser of all evils. On the other hand there is more power on the Columbia than we can even deal with.
pinotfilmnoir 4 months ago
@pinotfilmnoir Some fish definitely died and I'm sure some of the prime spawning gravel beds were covered up. However, in the long run this would benefit the salmon as they gain access to more spawning sites. They do return to their spawning grounds, they are in the river in which they were born. It doesn't mean they go to the exact same location in the river when they were frys. As for the production of power, this dam was built in 1913... Look at the size of the reservoir, it's a joke.
jangman69 4 months ago
Comment removed
pinotfilmnoir 4 months ago
Good job mate!
tl124 4 months ago
Just so you all know, the dam produced about 14.7 MW of power. That's equivalent to about 10 windmills, or in layman's terms "jack diddly." When removing a dam there are a lot of considerations and stake holders. It's not only "progressive" areas, what ever that means.
bubbalover71 4 months ago
@bubbalover71 Lol 14.7 mW is less than an AA battery! Lol go read a book & get off of the internet! Lol
buck6233 1 week ago
@buck6233 Big M little m, big difference! Lol, lol! Dipshit. What's that about being presumed a fool? Maybe you should learn the difference between capital and lower case letters before you start randomly talking smack to people. You never know who you're talking to on the internets!
bubbalover71 1 week ago
@bubbalover71 Ahhhahahaha then you were probably going for Kilowatts! :) Irregardless, I could really give a crap! Have a Sweet Day my friend! :)
buck6233 1 week ago
Awesome news, only the most progressive corners of the country are actively deconstructing dams. It's a sign that we can reverse destructive practices.
benwillvv 4 months ago
What is that structure at the bottom of the lake? Is that like remnants of an old cofferdam or something used during construction of the original dam?
spdwebdotnet 4 months ago
@spdwebdotnet i bet it was from the original construction. funny someone else noticed that, i thought it was so cool when i saw it at 2:41. interesting how things like that are preserved for so long.
johnsmithy667 4 months ago
Great news for the Salmon, and indirectly for people. Where would we be without Salmon? Maybe they won't go extinct now that they will have their breeding grounds given back to them. This brought tears to my eyes, knowing life has been given back to a river.
bobcatgarden 4 months ago 2
@bobcatgarden You cried because they blew up a dam for fish? Wow, some people really don't have lifes.
oBLACKIECHANoo 4 months ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo Shut your hole.... life doesn't just evolve around humans and our happiness and greed.
What an insensetive comment, D-BAG!!!
AaleciaA 4 months ago
@AaleciaA HAHAHAHA, shut the fuck up you pathetic fucking hippie. When you get an IQ above 4 come back and talk, fucking whore.
oBLACKIECHANoo 4 months ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo really?
avcorriendo 1 month ago
@AaleciaA Ahhhahahaha I think the term you were looking for is... 'revolve around'. Lol the library is 'dat-a-way! Ahhhahahahaha :) how does that saying go? It's better to keep your mouth shut, and be presumed a fool, than to open it, and remove all doubt. Dig? Lol
buck6233 1 week ago
Look at all those poor salmon being washed out to sea!
ForbiddenStallion 4 months ago
So the cost for a federally mandated fish spillway would have been $100M...? Did I hear that right? So rather than do that, they decided to tear it down. So where will the power come from now to service the 7000 residents?
Perhaps the better question is: Will there still be so much concern for spawning salmon when unemployment reaches 30%...?
CCMochi 4 months ago
@CCMochi, You shouldn't comment on topics you don't know anything about. This dam and the others recently taken out in the region were old, inefficient and their continued operation was not in the interest of rate payers. Also, the dam fed into the Western power grid, it did not directly provide power to a local community. Lastly, sport fishing employs 31,000 people in OR &WA where are they going to work without them.
Newton503 4 months ago 6
This has been flagged as spam show
33 miles of spawning habitat is BS!! (unless you count both sides of the river separately)
babyyakattack1 4 months ago
i saw that video in my class
3113weezy 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
maybe theyll wipe out some indians boats and shit by underwood while they do it
TheZkj 4 months ago