Added: 3 years ago
From: CipherMind117
Views: 28,201
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (121)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I like Crysis for the nanosuit and the interactions crytek builds into the environment

  • im hoping it looks this good with my gtx 280 which is coming in tomorrow....cant wait

  • @sonic911 well, i suggest hd6870

    almost same price and better performance

  • question about fraps....when i exported a 6 minute video it was 4 gigs.how do you keep the file size down or what do you do to compress the file afterwards? thanks

  • what about combat?? does the frames slow???

  • my geforce 8200 sucks i want a geforce gt220

  • @ajking2011 220 go with 430, dx 11 support

  • Ps3 couldn't run this on very high well maybe with 1 fps. Xbox would Run about -50 fps because it's even weaker than the ps3. But I don't have a gaming pc so the ps3 is perfect for me because it will run crysis 2 better than xbox3shitty. And have any of you guys played arma 2 it looks amazing.

  • Just my two cents: I do not find Crysis to be all that compelling for showcasing graphics. For example, around the 1:07 mark the palm tree has huge volumetric shadows as if there was a palm light from behind with a ton of dust in a dim room, where it should have been saturated out by the sun behind it. Things are just totally overdone in this game to the point of being ridiculous and all the pixel kiddies can do is drool over it. Meh.

  • @Snorglat Agreed. It is over the top, but at the time the video was made, 2009, there was no better game to showcase the graphics. Stalker was too obscure, 3DMark is alienating for people who just want to play games and see pretty visuals. Therefore this was the best and actually the most "compelling choice." But yes, I agree with you. I am not a fan of Crysis's gameplay nor its visuals.

  • @Snorglat The reason Crysis is a graphics showcase is not necessarily because of its visual quality so much as the demand its visuals exert on a computer's GPU. The standard assumption is that if your computer can run Crysis at max setting in HD, it is likely the highest-end gaming computer you could possibly really need.

  • @Snorglat Crysis has amazing graphics if you mod it, actually it is not exploiting its engine to its full capacities, look at this video, and you'll see why everyone says crysis has got beautiful graphics /watch?v=nD1VM6ML57w&feature=r­elated (it's not one of mine ^^)

  • i like crabs

  • Which is more powerfull, The GTX 280 or GTX 400? (I have GTX 400)

  • Which is more powerfull, The GTX 280 or GTX 400? (I have GTX 400)

  • I wish if I had that card ... lol but I'll try to buy an HD 5850 or GTX 475. What do you recommend me?

  • i just looked the video to the end because of the song :D

  • i play crysis on lowest with 1 gig ram and laggs a whole lot. i cant record it because my computer will blow and its fan makes the noisiest ring ever. no joke i bought crysis maximum edition and then i have to by a graphics card.

  • (comment from 2027) These graphics sucks !

  • @MegaFoch (comment from past) Is this real life ? :o

  • how many fps do you get and what cpu (and system) do you have?

  • Ths song is much better with the treadmills..........

    but i do like your PC.

    Im wondering, if i upgrade my PC, and by upgrade i mean get a new one, and by Crysis, would wired 360 controller work as a gamepad?

  • looks pretty crysis 2 is gonna suck

  • @1817tommarker i wouldnt say its gonna suck, they improved the engine alot in many ways, n the AI is the best of all times, at least crytek said that, but graphicaly, well yeah... they had to take out many things so that the consoles could run it, i hope they make it better on the PC, like, adding what they didnt to the consoles, cause a good pc coud run it just fine.

  • @xMackan750x hey im a little late but u would have to buy a higher graphics card at least a 5770 to get good fps the rest of ur system looks great tho

  • If this was on PS3 it would run at like 1fps xD

  • @blackkrainn Console games don't have Frame Rates, for fuck sake you fucking noob.

  • @sicK1239

    Yeah they do ... LOL...

  • Comment removed

  • @hawk356

    i mean on max settings, and i was slightly exaggerating :P

  • @hawk356

    on low-middle settings

  • @hawk356 Nope.  PS3 doesn't have close to enough power to run Crysis at max settings.

  • @RhiehnD Yeah I know I thought he meant just to play Crysis.

  • Comment removed

  • @hawk356 you wish, u dont even know what a PS3 is capable of obviously, on low settings maybe, n its probably gonna lag.

  • @bezoro2008 I wonder how bad xbox 360 can run it lol. XD

  • @hawk356 me too, actually x]

  • @bezoro2008 I'm gonna remove the comment since I don't want anymore people replying.

  • @hawk356 everything on high 60fps+ (im serious)

  • @hawk356 ps3 would have high/very high graphics on 60Fps

  • @FlameTheFame The consoles xbox and ps3 have less graphics power than pcs can. I like ps3 more than xbox tho.

  • @hawk356 well, it all depends on how much does a PC gamer wan't to spend, if he want's better machine then ps3 he needs to spend alot of money, but ps3 and xbox will die in 2013, with new PC hardware it already is old....

  • @FlameTheFame I said can lol. Isn't that the point of consoles, being cheaper than pcs and optimized towards gaming. The PC has background programs.

  • @FlameTheFame PS3 hard wear was old compared to PCs back when it was released. You can build a $600 PC that will obliterate a PS3 in gaming, plus it does everything else that a PC can. The the PS3 came out it was still a lot slower than the computers of the time, and PC speed has gone up ten fold since then. I have PC's so powerful that they can run Crysis without any graphics card (only about 2 FPS, but is does run). Now graphics cards are more powerful than the PS3, and I run 3 GPU's.

  • @verasforzza I banged your mum.

  • @ilkill3dil You win the most retarded, useless, epic failure comment award for today.

  • @FlameTheFame PS3 couldn't even come close to running Crysis even on low settings.

  • @xMackan750x You just need a better videocard

  • Im so stoked cos im going out tomorow to choose my new computer build! :D!

  • uncharted 2 still has better graphics

  • @TheJtapes

    Your're kidding me, U2 has great graphics, but remember its extremely linear unlike Crysis which is open world and has to be rendered on the fly which takes the latest PC GPU's especially if your gonna run the game Very High at 1920x1080 resolution. Crysis is nearly 3 yrs old and looks way better than U2 and you don't have to be a fanboy to see that it is.

  • @GodLikeSkillz89 yea i know crysis does have amazing graphics and its probably technically imposibble to run on a ps3 but im saying in terms of how they look uncharted 2 looks better imo and no im not a fan boy

  • This is nothing,my computer can play this at a higher rate and better quality....

    PC=xp

    Graphics card=none

    age of computer=prehistoric....lol

    I envy you,man...I want this game....

    great video by the way....

  • @maxsilos

    I know how you feel I have been watching youtube videos of people playing crysis and envy them so much....

  • @QMastermindQ Isnt hard to run it, you just need a after 2007computer. Plus the campaign was like 5hour's only.

  • genocide of the crabs

  • You think this can work max on my

    RIVA 128 ZX 8 mb

    Windows 95

    32 mb ram?

    :D

  • wtf?

  • lol

  • windows 95? people still use that?

  • just joking llol

  • @spartanK42 , yeah, i can tell you're joking. you're computer can very easily play 3 different crysis disks on max all at the same time.

  • no, FOUR!!!

  • 2:20 Lol

    Multikill!

    Triplekill!

    GODlike!

  • good music and gameplay 5/5

  • Wow. That's pretty stunning.

  • you don't like crabs don't you? ;) 2:20

  • hey right now i have nVidia GeForce 9600 GT (1 GB)...i was thinking about getting a Matrox Millenium II AGP (4 MB) card... u think i should buy it :/ ?

  • lol

  • @Moorhuhn0731 yeah, lol

  • @Moorhuhn0731 yes depends on the price. if its for $6 thats too much but $5 is a steal.

  • @Moorhuhn0731 how much does it cost? 4000$ because its antique? ure buying it from a museum? lol

  • @Moorhuhn0731 matrox millenium II, memories...ahh :)

  • okay

  • a gtx 280 is better than you're shitty graka^^

  • i got 2x gtx 280's but they are superclocked to beat the gtx 285 ftw :)

  • wow thats looks real

  • is this on very high, max res, and 16xQ aa?

  • will my dual sli gtx 260s work better than this?

  • yes

  • YeS !

  • @gellscream2009 of course since a 260 is very close to the GTX 280 but a GTX 285/295 will beat that config

  • Which thing on you can change for beautifull explosions on settingss?

  • на хрена крабов то валить,то коров в АРМЕ валят ,то крабов в Кризисе...

  • Translated, what you just said means,

    "to horseradish crab then fell, then the cows knocked in Armagh, the crabs in Crisis "

    What the fuck is wrong with you.

    or should i say,

    Подковы крабов в Техасе, не нужно носить обувь по понедельникам.

    An extra joke for anyone who bothers to translate that.

  • What DA FUCKK??? translate: Horseshoe crabs in Texas, do not need to wear shoes on Monday.

  • yeah, my Russian is rather limited, but as far as i get it, he's not happy of you killing the crabs :)

  • LOL yes they don't need to wear shoes hahaa.

  • Podkovy crab in Texas, you don't need to wear on Mondays?

  • wait!!!!!... i know this song! how he calls?

  • i wish i had a gaming pc

  • they are tottaly word

  • I just found out about this, look up onLive if you're interested. Seems cool

  • on live is compressed, and streamed over the internet, thus lag and shitty quality.

  • I agree, but they seem to be all over this, I do agree with you, normally, however, this time, I won't say they can't but instead, i'll play the "wait and see" card. If wht they say is true, that's impressive!

  • yeah, i concur that the internet will eventually be able to stream 1920x1200 anti aliased video at 100 fps with zero lag, but this of course is sometime in the near-future, not now, and at that point hardware will have advanced beyond what the internet can do. What I am saying is the speed of hardware will exceed the speed of the internet always.

    Feel free to rebut.

  • O yeah, I agree completely, but streaming 480i to 720p seems somewhat high, yet, their optimism seems really high. Why would a company build 4 buildings full of the highest hardware tech if they knew that lag would be too much for this to work. Once again, I agree, but I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt and will be sure to see if this works or not when it is actually released

  • I get the same fps as you I got a Gtx 260 Core 216 Superclocked =D Great video

  • Fucking bullshit, You re so lucky to have that card i got a 9500gt and i have to get mixed up settings for it to look good D:

  • go buy a second one and run it in sli thats what i did with my 8800 gt even tho it runs crysis on very high every thing just fine with out my second one

  • Wish i could i got the crappiest motherboard but its good enough though it only has one pciex16 slot

  • OMG my laptop fails so hard. It's struggling to play the youtube 720p HD let alone any actual gaming. Ugh. I need a new cappy, a new pc, a ps3 slim, a new phone, MW2 (on up to 3 consoles!) a G27, BFBC2 on PC AND Xbox. FFS WHY THE HELL IS THIS YEAR SO BLOODY EXPENSIVE!!!!???

    lol

  • youtube is intenet not actually any thing inside the computer, mine is being shitty right now and i got a gaming rig

  • yes it is, youtube uses your computer (through flash) to render the video, and since my laptop is so shit it can't render the HD video in flash without stuttering.

    However, since my last post, I've started putting together my rig, which will have an XFX 5870 in it so bye bye video problems :D

  • ya but your intenet conection takes most of the work any card from like 4 series up(nvidia line) can run hd flash just fine

  • Not true, HD video lags like a bitch when you don't have a good card.

  • what frames you get w/o fraps?

  • what fps you get on my gtx 295 i get a average of 40 on epic high detail mod and 60 on normal

  • what a great card. I'm probably not going to upgrade though. I'll wait for a bit. The GTX 280 can tackle anything out there just fine.

  • yup this summer im building a rig :P

    evga 790i motherboard

    2 gtx 280 more then likly evga

    dual core at 3.2 ghz gona liquid cool and overclock as much as possible.

    4gb of ddr3 ram.

    gona have a budget of 2 grand so :P

    and also a 500gb westerdigital harddrive (westerdigital harddrives have never failed me to date)

  • You "Normal" = Very High + 4xAA?

  • hmmm will a evga 9800gtx+ superclocked play this game on very high at 1280x1024?

  • nope i got a evga 9800gtx+ to i play on high on very high i get like 17fps avg. 1680*1050

  • lol maybe on the first island level that everyone seems to love so much.

    Later on in the game when you get into intense battles and bigger environments you defiantly won't get be getting 45 fps. A 9800gtx is capable of running Crysis well but on Very High in the later levels? Hell no

  • no you'll be fine. At that res, and with that card you'll get at least 45FPS on High.

  • nice quality :D

  • is this without overclocking?

  • yes

  • wow this game is so sick

  • Do u have any lag with the gtx 280 when u are playing? or it´s smooth? thx good video btw

  • not at all. It's all quite smooth.

  • In which resolution do you play? Thx for answer

  • I play at 1440x900, but it's complicated. That monitor broke, so i used an old 1600x1200 for this, but cuz i wanted HD on youtube i filmed at 1280x720. My new monitor is 1920x1200. Expect a video shortly

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more