wow, i have never seen such pownage in a while, this was pure gold, they had ABSOLUTELY no answer to his question, this may be one of the best pro gun videos i have seen on here
I hate the fact that gun rights people always say things like there's background checks. Well if gun ownership is truly a right then there should not be.
@pdxeddie1111 look at the 2nd ammendment of the constitution of the united states it states the people have to right to keep and bear arms that right shall not be infringed this is the gun right it is based off of matural rights which means everyone in the world has this right they just dont realize it and the right has enemies
@spartanunoob ya thats my point and yes there are people that hate all rights, look at the westboro people their 1st amendment rights are being encroached on and most people think thats a good thing LOL its a slippery slope, this country better wake up cause the devil is running to make it into a commie world where hes the king of it LOL
Deny the killer to get a gun. This lady is a dope. The word is summon, not summons. Hes making us look bad. Avoid it? Stay locked in your house? This lady sounds like a robot. She has no answers, just the same stupid rhetoric. I think the guy at appx 5:30 was wrong..
I've said it once and I said it again - gun control is a fascist tactic.
Personally if I was married and had children I'd be more implied to own a gun to keep my family safe. Of course I'd lock it up so my kids couldn't get to it,
you are damn right, the first gun control laws been enacted in Nazi Germany in 1935 under the "Reichsicherheits-Gesetze" - the was never an other gun registry like that enacted before and it soul purpose was to disarm all future victims of the Nazi regime.
@cassidy99ful actually the first time it was ordered to remove weapons from citizens happened in the 1770s and it caused the first two battles of the american revolution at lexington and concord thats why it is so important to us whereas it was not a law it would make no sense that they would know that would happen beforehand so in a sense it was the first gun control law in history hitler really did use it however as did stalin and mao and every other communist
Gun grabbers have no answer to realistic situations where guns are needed and forget it is a constitutionally guaranteed and supreme court upheld right!
Thank you for fighting for our rights, anyone else notice how anti-gunners arent open to debate, block all comments on youtube, and even block ratings? It just shows how facist they really are.
I sure do. I've written the brady campaign (user name: bradyvideocampaign) because they've disallowed comments on their videos. At the end of my message i stated "I await your answer"...that was January 30th...2008. It's June 29th...2009. No response!
Wow, watching some of these videos has shocked me. The anti-2A people just really don't want to talk about it at all. They nod like they're listening to you, repeat the mantra and then just walk away without any realistic solutions. They just want to "lie down" and if you don't agree with them, then they want to "run like hell." No one was rude, getting loud, being confrontational. They even asked them for a solution. Nothing given but "the hand."
All she does is say rhetoric, but she doesn't say how she'd do it. She doesn't explain how it would work. That means her words are nothing but empty rheotoric, nothing but bull spit.
If she can't elaborate her position, then she has no position to defend.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
how id handle the situation....BAN ALL GUNS and stop producing them so neither the 'bad guy' or the 'good guy' can have it
under that thinking......look, no VA tech, columbine or anything else
i have yet to be shown a gun that didn't exist hurt someone and if you cant hurt someone with a nonexistent gun there's no need to wanna get a gun to 'defend' yourself
look what else comes out of my thinking.....less murders look at that
Wow. I guess if you banned guns, then all the criminals would definitely turn them in... When you outlaw guns, only outlaws have guns. I can't fathom how you don't understand that.
Banning all guns will not make all guns cease to exist.
I am reminded of a chorus from a song by Rush: "Manhattan Project" from their album "Power Windows." It's about the invention of the atomic bomb, but...
Note how I emphasized important parts of the chrous with asteriks.
"Big shots try to hold it back" with laws that seek to ban guns without understanding how it wouldn't realistically work to ensure the safety of the people. And, if the police are not under any obligation to protect the people (this was ruled by the Supreme Court numerous times), then who is responsible for protecting you? (YOU are responsible for your own safety.)
"Fools," like you, "try to wish it away" with the hope that, somehow, your wish may come true without understanding just how oversimplified your reasoning is and how it ignores certain issues behind it, such as who'd give up their guns and who wouldn't.
If the cops aren't responsible for protecting the public, they are also not liable for failure in that regard. If you can't count on the cops when a bad guy comes for you, who can you count on if you are unarmed and cornered?
@sukiari No it did not. It however was proven the gun buyback (aka "gun ban") was proven to be a waste of taxpayers money and had no effect on gun crime or gun homicides. Look up "STUDY SHOWS BUYBACK HAD NO EFFECT ON THE MURDER RATE" on google.
How did this massacre haappen at VA Tech? Wasn't there a sign that read something like "Dangerous Firearms not allowed"? Part of me wants to have the feds ban guns, so these silly white women will finally understand what happens when you grab guns--think South Africa under Mandela!
Anti's really do have some sort of mental defect that disallows them to process logic. Murderers do not follow law! Add as many layers of BS regulation, background checks, laws that you want. The criminal will STILL get his guns ILLEGALLY.
You can see clearly that these anti gun people are idiots. They back off a debate when they are losing or if they cannot justify or have an answer to an issue. This idiot couple ought to be ashamed of themselves. These are the kind of people who are dangerous to the country. The kind of people who should migrate to Russia so they can sell their rights and live like idiots as idiots do. They do not deserve America and America do not deserve them.
Gun grabbers just want an all out ban on guns but DC vs Heller case affirmed that private citizens have the right keep firearms. The only things groups like these can do now is try and regulate it so much and make it so expensive that citizens give up on the idea of owning a firearm. While DC vs Heller case was a huge blow to the gun grabbers the fight is far from over.
These people are pathetic. MMM has never had their facts right about firearms and this video is no exception.
Can you say Police Controlled State? Is this what these fucking people want? Why don't you move to China and have all your rights taking away. I'm sure that's what these people want, to be completely controlled by the government. I can't believe how willingly these people are to given up their rights for a sense of false security. Whenever all our rights are taking away and we turn into a Fascist State, don't say I didn't know!
How about the Americans creed: 1.I will never surrender my guns as a result of a political leader not following their oath of office to protect the Constitution of the U.S.A. via voting to ban guns or even restrict them out of existance. 2.I will consider any American or group that supports gun bans as a traitor to our Country.
Wow, do these MMM bunch have ANY idea what the black market is? Or that it exists and you can get virtually anything you want if you have money? Also, even the most extensive background checks and waiting periods could not have prevented the VTec massacre, its unfortunate (and inconvenient for the gun-grabbers) but it does not prevent these things from happening. You can only do that when responsible citizens are armed and able to defend themselves and others around them.
People don't understand when you set up these laws they effect everyone EXCEPT the criminals who don't follow laws. All you do is further handicap someone's right to protect themselves against bad guys. Criminals have even said that they're more afraid of an armed citizen then the police.
Gun control is nothing but a false sense of security. It hurts more than it helps. The stats are on our side.
"Google" the names Bonnie Elmasri and Catherine Latta and you'll find how some gun laws (namely, waiting periods) affected them. One of them did not survive by the way.
There was no logical agrument presented by the protestors - pure emotional appeal. And their emotions prevented them from even discussing the topic. Unfortunately, folks still vote on emotional appeal - so if you want your rights, you need to work to protect them.
Thank god for people such as the ones in this video who stand up for our rights.
It still amazes me the power of IGNORANCE when backed by pure emotion. God gave everyone logic for a reason ladies, I suggest and pray that you use it.
this is the first time I've seen a video like this. But yeah, Million mom my ass!!!! haha. good one rangereview! But that couch lady in black with shades is fucking annoying. She acts like a someone who got a new ball transplant.
Guns are part of America's ability to remain free. All you suckers from other states with no gun rights live as slaves to whatever your government or criminals want to do to you. Go ahead, make fun, call us names and derride us for being free to have the right to keep and bear arms...we don't give a shit what you think, BTW, VA Tech and NIU were "gun free zone" or in reality a "victim/target rich zone." Give the students and professors guns and this would not even be an issue.
Give the students and professors (those who are 21 and over who already have a concealed carry permit to carry a handgun) a FIGHTING CHANCE to defend themselves (and others around them) from imminent harm and death by criminals wanting to murder them. Prevention AND preparedness GO HAND-IN-HAND. The police, although they honestly try, many times arrive at crime scenes too late. And thus, the responsibility of your personal safety and of those with you ultimately rests on YOUR SHOULDERS.
It scares me as to how stupid people can really be. The kid should have been in a mental facility had people done what they were supposed to. Gun laws were already in place and people screwed up.
This woman needs to realize that the reason he was able to buy those guns is because the information that he had been adjudicated mentally defective never made it the federal government database (NICS). This happened due to a wierd Virgina law on how to handle that information based on the punishment aspect. Since the information was not there to stop the purchase he was cleared for the sale.
This woman need to learn what is the second amendment.Because in the end they will lose because DC vs. Hiller/Parker in SCOUTS right now.That antis-gunners
I can respect the MMM's desire for "sensible gun policy" (whatever that is), but just having restrictive laws passed does not keep guns out of the hands of criminals who will break the law to acquire firearms regardless.
I guess I differ in opinion in that I don't make the assumption that enforcing more background checks will directly result in my being safer in public.
That old bag is so angry and bitter, but just can't have a rational discussion. You guys were very respectful and kept your voices down. But she had to kneejerk violently and tune out.
Unfortunately the traffic washed out much of the rest of the audio so it was hard to make out a lot of the rest.
A disrespect to the apple-pie Brady Bunch!! :-)
SteveCarras 7 months ago
All anti-gun fags there are ignorant fucking retards.
Crow762 11 months ago
wow, i have never seen such pownage in a while, this was pure gold, they had ABSOLUTELY no answer to his question, this may be one of the best pro gun videos i have seen on here
kingjosh87 1 year ago
As always, these million mom morons had absolutely nothing to say as a defense of their anti-freedom stance.
drj90210 1 year ago 2
What is funny about the "million mom march" socialists is that they never got anywhere NEAR a million let alone a QUARTER of the number.
Arelak 1 year ago 2
I hate the fact that gun rights people always say things like there's background checks. Well if gun ownership is truly a right then there should not be.
pdxeddie1111 1 year ago
@pdxeddie1111 look at the 2nd ammendment of the constitution of the united states it states the people have to right to keep and bear arms that right shall not be infringed this is the gun right it is based off of matural rights which means everyone in the world has this right they just dont realize it and the right has enemies
spartanunoob 1 year ago
@spartanunoob ya thats my point and yes there are people that hate all rights, look at the westboro people their 1st amendment rights are being encroached on and most people think thats a good thing LOL its a slippery slope, this country better wake up cause the devil is running to make it into a commie world where hes the king of it LOL
pdxeddie1111 1 year ago
Deny the killer to get a gun. This lady is a dope. The word is summon, not summons. Hes making us look bad. Avoid it? Stay locked in your house? This lady sounds like a robot. She has no answers, just the same stupid rhetoric. I think the guy at appx 5:30 was wrong..
rb2112002 1 year ago 3
This anti gunners are hilarious. The man seemed reasonable but the woman just spouts soundbites and wants to run away when she has to think. LOL
Maxwedge12000 1 year ago
I've said it once and I said it again - gun control is a fascist tactic.
Personally if I was married and had children I'd be more implied to own a gun to keep my family safe. Of course I'd lock it up so my kids couldn't get to it,
MetalGearNaked 2 years ago 4
you are damn right, the first gun control laws been enacted in Nazi Germany in 1935 under the "Reichsicherheits-Gesetze" - the was never an other gun registry like that enacted before and it soul purpose was to disarm all future victims of the Nazi regime.
Sideshowbobx 2 years ago
@Sideshowbobx just an fyi the first gun control laws were enacted in america in 1868 to prevent blacks from owning guns.youtube "no guns for negroes"
cassidy99ful 1 year ago
@cassidy99ful actually the first time it was ordered to remove weapons from citizens happened in the 1770s and it caused the first two battles of the american revolution at lexington and concord thats why it is so important to us whereas it was not a law it would make no sense that they would know that would happen beforehand so in a sense it was the first gun control law in history hitler really did use it however as did stalin and mao and every other communist
spartanunoob 1 year ago
Gun grabbers have no answer to realistic situations where guns are needed and forget it is a constitutionally guaranteed and supreme court upheld right!
buttermobile 2 years ago
you can open carry a handgun at 18 in PA as well.
sandelpop 2 years ago
You CAN own a handgun when you are 18 in VA and OPEN CARRY it. It is illegal to purchase a gun from a dealer until you are 21, not possession.
l1nuxun1l 2 years ago
wrong iam 18 and in az i can open carry a hand gun
m6dm90 2 years ago
Thank you for fighting for our rights, anyone else notice how anti-gunners arent open to debate, block all comments on youtube, and even block ratings? It just shows how facist they really are.
amberpoovey 2 years ago 4
I sure do. I've written the brady campaign (user name: bradyvideocampaign) because they've disallowed comments on their videos. At the end of my message i stated "I await your answer"...that was January 30th...2008. It's June 29th...2009. No response!
LamontDaGrizzly 2 years ago 2
you can debate with if you read my anti gun videos.
GoTimothy 2 years ago
Wow, watching some of these videos has shocked me. The anti-2A people just really don't want to talk about it at all. They nod like they're listening to you, repeat the mantra and then just walk away without any realistic solutions. They just want to "lie down" and if you don't agree with them, then they want to "run like hell." No one was rude, getting loud, being confrontational. They even asked them for a solution. Nothing given but "the hand."
raydog1111 2 years ago 2
That girl is R-E-T-A-R-D-E-D.
All she does is say rhetoric, but she doesn't say how she'd do it. She doesn't explain how it would work. That means her words are nothing but empty rheotoric, nothing but bull spit.
If she can't elaborate her position, then she has no position to defend.
Watcher3223 2 years ago
*yawn*
I can't hear half of what anyone is saying.
cotss2012 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
how id handle the situation....BAN ALL GUNS and stop producing them so neither the 'bad guy' or the 'good guy' can have it
under that thinking......look, no VA tech, columbine or anything else
i have yet to be shown a gun that didn't exist hurt someone and if you cant hurt someone with a nonexistent gun there's no need to wanna get a gun to 'defend' yourself
look what else comes out of my thinking.....less murders look at that
TENNSUMITSUMA 3 years ago
Wow. I guess if you banned guns, then all the criminals would definitely turn them in... When you outlaw guns, only outlaws have guns. I can't fathom how you don't understand that.
S13gmund 3 years ago 4
Banning all guns will not make all guns cease to exist.
I am reminded of a chorus from a song by Rush: "Manhattan Project" from their album "Power Windows." It's about the invention of the atomic bomb, but...
The big bang - took and shook the world
Shot down the rising sun
The end was begun - it would hit everyone
When the chain reaction was done
*The big shots - try to hold it back*
*Fools try to wish it away*
The hopeful depend on a world without end
Whatever the hopeless may say
Watcher3223 2 years ago
Note how I emphasized important parts of the chrous with asteriks.
"Big shots try to hold it back" with laws that seek to ban guns without understanding how it wouldn't realistically work to ensure the safety of the people. And, if the police are not under any obligation to protect the people (this was ruled by the Supreme Court numerous times), then who is responsible for protecting you? (YOU are responsible for your own safety.)
Watcher3223 2 years ago 2
"Fools," like you, "try to wish it away" with the hope that, somehow, your wish may come true without understanding just how oversimplified your reasoning is and how it ignores certain issues behind it, such as who'd give up their guns and who wouldn't.
If the cops aren't responsible for protecting the public, they are also not liable for failure in that regard. If you can't count on the cops when a bad guy comes for you, who can you count on if you are unarmed and cornered?
Watcher3223 2 years ago 2
Australia banned most guns and their murder rate shot up afterwards. The criminals knew they had free reign.
sukiari 2 years ago 19
@sukiari No it did not. It however was proven the gun buyback (aka "gun ban") was proven to be a waste of taxpayers money and had no effect on gun crime or gun homicides. Look up "STUDY SHOWS BUYBACK HAD NO EFFECT ON THE MURDER RATE" on google.
unknown1730 1 year ago
@unknown1730 I believe that there was in fact a sweeping ban of firearms in Australia. I do know that you are allowed to have certain guns though.
sukiari 1 year ago
haha he protesters got owned they couldnt answer the question because they knew he was right lol
1airplane21 3 years ago
How did this massacre haappen at VA Tech? Wasn't there a sign that read something like "Dangerous Firearms not allowed"? Part of me wants to have the feds ban guns, so these silly white women will finally understand what happens when you grab guns--think South Africa under Mandela!
magickmatt138 3 years ago
Anti's really do have some sort of mental defect that disallows them to process logic. Murderers do not follow law! Add as many layers of BS regulation, background checks, laws that you want. The criminal will STILL get his guns ILLEGALLY.
richarcm 3 years ago
I love watching these debate videos, the pro gun control idiots always get their asses handed to them
JBird8622 3 years ago
Ha Ha idiots trying to prove a point about nothing and can't even answer the guys question.
jsh78mang 3 years ago
You can see clearly that these anti gun people are idiots. They back off a debate when they are losing or if they cannot justify or have an answer to an issue. This idiot couple ought to be ashamed of themselves. These are the kind of people who are dangerous to the country. The kind of people who should migrate to Russia so they can sell their rights and live like idiots as idiots do. They do not deserve America and America do not deserve them.
tokibats 3 years ago
Gun grabbers just want an all out ban on guns but DC vs Heller case affirmed that private citizens have the right keep firearms. The only things groups like these can do now is try and regulate it so much and make it so expensive that citizens give up on the idea of owning a firearm. While DC vs Heller case was a huge blow to the gun grabbers the fight is far from over.
These people are pathetic. MMM has never had their facts right about firearms and this video is no exception.
mlmiller1983 3 years ago
Can you say Police Controlled State? Is this what these fucking people want? Why don't you move to China and have all your rights taking away. I'm sure that's what these people want, to be completely controlled by the government. I can't believe how willingly these people are to given up their rights for a sense of false security. Whenever all our rights are taking away and we turn into a Fascist State, don't say I didn't know!
boiracerxx 3 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
How about the Americans creed: 1.I will never surrender my guns as a result of a political leader not following their oath of office to protect the Constitution of the U.S.A. via voting to ban guns or even restrict them out of existance. 2.I will consider any American or group that supports gun bans as a traitor to our Country.
Fockersnextdoor 3 years ago 4
one of the best comments i have ever seen on youtube!
totse1234 3 years ago
Wow, do these MMM bunch have ANY idea what the black market is? Or that it exists and you can get virtually anything you want if you have money? Also, even the most extensive background checks and waiting periods could not have prevented the VTec massacre, its unfortunate (and inconvenient for the gun-grabbers) but it does not prevent these things from happening. You can only do that when responsible citizens are armed and able to defend themselves and others around them.
norcofreerider604 3 years ago
People don't understand when you set up these laws they effect everyone EXCEPT the criminals who don't follow laws. All you do is further handicap someone's right to protect themselves against bad guys. Criminals have even said that they're more afraid of an armed citizen then the police.
Gun control is nothing but a false sense of security. It hurts more than it helps. The stats are on our side.
ArguingFox 3 years ago 2
"...false sense of security."
Well put!
RML00002 3 years ago
"Google" the names Bonnie Elmasri and Catherine Latta and you'll find how some gun laws (namely, waiting periods) affected them. One of them did not survive by the way.
DJSedSo 2 years ago
These anti-gun nuts don't have an argument. For most of the video, they were dumb founded.
manatarms79 3 years ago
There was no logical agrument presented by the protestors - pure emotional appeal. And their emotions prevented them from even discussing the topic. Unfortunately, folks still vote on emotional appeal - so if you want your rights, you need to work to protect them.
unregisteruser 3 years ago
I'm glad I can't find anyone on YouTube who supports these idiots.
rredman84 3 years ago 2
me too
mrpickles478 3 years ago
Thank god for people such as the ones in this video who stand up for our rights.
It still amazes me the power of IGNORANCE when backed by pure emotion. God gave everyone logic for a reason ladies, I suggest and pray that you use it.
DopaVash 3 years ago 2
Guns are not the cause of violence you bitches. Psychopaths and criminals with illegally obtained guns are the cause of violence.
zcm007attack 3 years ago
Million mom my ass...more like a thousand droopy tittied couch whores....what a pathetic group of females
RangeReview 3 years ago 4
well said A+
kalzx 3 years ago
this is the first time I've seen a video like this. But yeah, Million mom my ass!!!! haha. good one rangereview! But that couch lady in black with shades is fucking annoying. She acts like a someone who got a new ball transplant.
ninjaontog123 3 years ago
were here today to prevent..blahblah..she sounds like a man
maxpineapple 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Guns are part of America's ability to remain free. All you suckers from other states with no gun rights live as slaves to whatever your government or criminals want to do to you. Go ahead, make fun, call us names and derride us for being free to have the right to keep and bear arms...we don't give a shit what you think, BTW, VA Tech and NIU were "gun free zone" or in reality a "victim/target rich zone." Give the students and professors guns and this would not even be an issue.
buttermobile 3 years ago 5
Give the students and professors (those who are 21 and over who already have a concealed carry permit to carry a handgun) a FIGHTING CHANCE to defend themselves (and others around them) from imminent harm and death by criminals wanting to murder them. Prevention AND preparedness GO HAND-IN-HAND. The police, although they honestly try, many times arrive at crime scenes too late. And thus, the responsibility of your personal safety and of those with you ultimately rests on YOUR SHOULDERS.
DJSedSo 2 years ago
Guns save lives....period.....and armed society is a safe society....stupid anti gun fruitcakes
RangeReview 4 years ago 6
Now wait a minute. Va. Tech is a "gun free zone". Gun free zones are supposed to work what happened?
TDubya5 4 years ago 4
I've been wondering that too...
astrowanabe 4 years ago
It scares me as to how stupid people can really be. The kid should have been in a mental facility had people done what they were supposed to. Gun laws were already in place and people screwed up.
trulyheaven777 4 years ago 2
This woman needs to realize that the reason he was able to buy those guns is because the information that he had been adjudicated mentally defective never made it the federal government database (NICS). This happened due to a wierd Virgina law on how to handle that information based on the punishment aspect. Since the information was not there to stop the purchase he was cleared for the sale.
3meninaroom 4 years ago 2
This woman need to learn what is the second amendment.Because in the end they will lose because DC vs. Hiller/Parker in SCOUTS right now.That antis-gunners
CRFFL03 4 years ago
Just how does she think more laws will prevent shootings?
Isn't murder already quite illegal?
chriskarma 4 years ago 25
I can respect the MMM's desire for "sensible gun policy" (whatever that is), but just having restrictive laws passed does not keep guns out of the hands of criminals who will break the law to acquire firearms regardless.
I guess I differ in opinion in that I don't make the assumption that enforcing more background checks will directly result in my being safer in public.
RabidNinjaPenguins 4 years ago
Actually under Federal law, you can possess a handgun at age 18. Virginia has no further restrictions.
CCW permits at age 21.
Buying a handgun from FFL at age 21.
Possessing and/or purchasing through a private sale/gift at age 18.
novadak 4 years ago
that women suffers from Mental retardation
joeyredneck 4 years ago
That old bag is so angry and bitter, but just can't have a rational discussion. You guys were very respectful and kept your voices down. But she had to kneejerk violently and tune out.
Unfortunately the traffic washed out much of the rest of the audio so it was hard to make out a lot of the rest.
stinkfart 4 years ago