Added: 3 years ago
From: BereanBeacon
Views: 2,174
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (26)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Dawkins is one of the greatest atheists alive.

  • Nautilus hasn't evolved an eye because it does not need to. the fact that it has survived as a species for so long is testament to the fact it is so successful. it does not have a more complex eye because there is no need to as it can obviously survive perfectly well without it.

  • Nautilus hasn't evolved an eye because it did not need to. the fact that it has survived as a species for so long is testament to the fact it is so successful. it does not have a more complex eye because there is no need to as it can obviously survive perfectly well without it.

  • You can lead a horse to water...

  • dawkins has been knowing God is very real...he rather deal with that eternity {for the moment} than deal with the humiliation by doing the obvious..ignoring the concious..gettin the heart nice 'n hardened...these are the days a very small group he knows of who take pleasure in his silent NOT SO WELL hidden horror of what awaits once his bloodsack of bones passes..then it starts..but back in the 70s he had his searing...tic toc..another one goes by..its comin..well, he did do his job.

  • You are in the delusion! Atheist!!!

  • He said we didnt need to prove there is no God, you dont need to prove something doesnt exist, can you prove I cant read minds!

  • If only creationists knew they are making people abandon religion in huge waves...

    I probably would be a Christian still if not for the creationist movement.

    You guys are making Christianity as a whole look ridiculous, even though you are a minority within Christianity.

  • @marcsurtees

    Please define 'kind'.

    What is a 'kind' of animal.

  • He is discussing Dawkins book, read the title.

  • So all this specieation occurred within the last six thousand years but no new species are being created today?

  • @preachingsin

    New species are being created, move animals to different environments within a few decades max...they adapt and are then classed as a new species, assuming it hadn't been present in that environment beforehand.

  • look at all of these creationist wombats commenting on this bs

  • 32:12 The foot prints look like a bird's, so it must be a bird. What kind of science is that?

  • Design by natural selection is actually a lot smarter than creating all species separately. If the latter is how God did it, he would say: Shit! Why didn't I think of that... It would have saved me so much work!

  • Typing 'beneficial mutations' and/or 'observed speciation' into Google, and reading a few of the results, will enable anyone to refute most of Dr Surtees' claims

  • Pile of rubble, we know there exist mutations that benefit bacteria, but ONLY bacteria. Thats one of the reasons why bacteria are the kings of survivability, despite being the simplest of life forms. But suppose you name "beneficial" mutations within humans, of which its plausible that their accumulation would cause macro evolution. Conjoined twins? down syndrome? 3 arms? Not beneficial! Which ones are? A slight variation within the organs that prevent high cholesterol? If you go to Disneyland's

  • Fantasy Land, they also will extrapolate such a meaningless minute thing, postulating that its macro evolution in action. The truth is that it only means that some humans have lower cholesterol than others. Just like some possess genetics that cause them to bleed to death from a slight cut. Oh, how did that happen? How did such a trait thats so unfit for survival, end up only amongst the most powerful, upper crust of some societies? The Simianist Manifesto, like the Communist, is WHACKED

  • 14:29 "Random mutations reduce fitness generally." Rubbish; most mutations are neutral, some beneficial, some harmful. Mutations have been shown to produce new features.

  • Fantasy Land, they also will extrapolate such a meaningless minute thing, postulating that its macro evolution in action. The truth is that it only means that some humans have lower cholesterol than others. Just like some possess genetics that cause them to bleed to death from a slight cut. Oh, how did that happen? How did such a trait thats so unfit for survival, end up only amongst the most powerful, upper crust of some societies? The Simianist Manifesto, like the Communist, is WHACKED

  • Great video.

  • great video, God Bless you

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more