I'm really not sure what redefinition of the dictionary Erin is suggesting. She said that paper dictionaries can't hold enough words (now I'll always have to think about ham butt when I look things up), and online dictionaries lose the serendipity of finding unexpected words...so...then what? I thought she was going to have some new and exciting ideas for alternative dictionaries, but instead she just had some bad jokes.
@sophy95926 you should check out her website wordnik(dot)com . I was wondering what sort of online dictionary she was envisioning, too, and found the site on her twitter. It looks pretty cool from what I've seen so far.
I can find pretty much any infromation I'm looking for, including words and their etymology, on Wikipedia. Wiktionary is also on its way to become my number 1 online dictionary.
So I think a lot of professional lexicographers will soon be without a job...
to squiptipadoogleboinkaflop: to purposefully or inadvertently reveal one's belief that a word is not real unless it appears in a dictionary. // I suspect the belief comes from word games which require a set word bank (such as the Scrabble dictionary) whereby otherwise perfectly acceptable words would be an illegal move in play ^_^
That was a great presentation. I think it was the best PowerPoint I've seen. Think of all the presentations you've been to with the charts, graphs and 20 bullet points per screen. That was top notch.
Though she makes some very good points, I don't know that I agree with her.
I've always viewed the dictionary as a formal standardization of language. A set of standards that we conform to in order to facilitate accurate communication between members of our society.
What she seems to be proposing is a sort of "wiki-reality", where as long as something is used in speech, it becomes part of speech.
What's wrong with that idea? Conformity is what's holding us back, the limitless possibilities of the English language cannot be contained in the traditional model. I agree with her because every time i write a paper, most recently for my psychology class, i encounter words in articles that are undictionaried; they are, i must admit, an obsolete structure for the demarcation of our language.
@AnarchyUnlimited It's a common misconception that lexicographers come up with definitions on their own and the speakers of the languages are a secondary authority to the dictionaries. It's actually the complete opposite - lexicographers study how speakers of a language use the word and derive the definition from them. That's why they must be updated, because language evolves. Lexicographers (and most linguists in general) are descriptivists, not prescriptivists.
@AnarchyUnlimited Strangely enough, your last sentence describes how language actually works. She's not proposing that it should to work that way, she's proposing that more people should have a deeper understanding of how language works.
pedophile =loves children[there has to be a better word]
what does 'gay' mean
indiginous means sans culture[ie a plant can be indiginous but people cant]
aborigonal means the same as jew[belonging to the land]
of course there are many leci con versions that rewrite at whim, just as there are people using words to define things evil ,but hidden behind words[no child left behind]surge]incursion, friendly fire,civil war,neo[new]con,alternative medicine
Friendly fire is not a euphemism though. "Friendly" is not being used as an adjective in the phrase; it is being used as a noun. The phrase means "fire from friendlies," a "friendly" being an allied soldier.
Guys, close your ears and listen. Totally sounds like Anne Hathaway eh!!!!
joelryan365 1 week ago in playlist More videos from TEDtalksDirector
Wow...she REALLY loves words
crudhousefull 3 months ago in playlist More videos from TEDtalksDirector
This has been flagged as spam show
and wordnik.com was born. :)
christabelleadeline 7 months ago
Comment removed
christabelleadeline 7 months ago
You can fall in love of a brain :)
orprado 10 months ago
Yeah, this woman is probably insane in bed.
hymnofashes 1 year ago
I'm really not sure what redefinition of the dictionary Erin is suggesting. She said that paper dictionaries can't hold enough words (now I'll always have to think about ham butt when I look things up), and online dictionaries lose the serendipity of finding unexpected words...so...then what? I thought she was going to have some new and exciting ideas for alternative dictionaries, but instead she just had some bad jokes.
sophy95926 1 year ago
@sophy95926 you should check out her website wordnik(dot)com . I was wondering what sort of online dictionary she was envisioning, too, and found the site on her twitter. It looks pretty cool from what I've seen so far.
sarcasticwhiteboard 9 months ago
every time she opens her mouth... little a part of me dies
i had to watch this in tok and about killed myself
beastyboiz 1 year ago
lol cool, although I think some jobs are important enough that they should be done, even if they're not fun :p
noobler9 1 year ago
I LOVE HER! she is so passionate!!! What a fascinating talk!
lukealan09 1 year ago
not funny. but give her props for trying
cheesesandwhich12 1 year ago
I can find pretty much any infromation I'm looking for, including words and their etymology, on Wikipedia. Wiktionary is also on its way to become my number 1 online dictionary.
So I think a lot of professional lexicographers will soon be without a job...
strappinggermanlad 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Her legs are also two hams that won´t fit in the pan
Burdell22000 2 years ago
I think I'm in love...
jahrleriksen 2 years ago 7
to squiptipadoogleboinkaflop: to purposefully or inadvertently reveal one's belief that a word is not real unless it appears in a dictionary. // I suspect the belief comes from word games which require a set word bank (such as the Scrabble dictionary) whereby otherwise perfectly acceptable words would be an illegal move in play ^_^
ablestmage 3 years ago
I've fallen madly in love with Erin McKean.
mikedubya 3 years ago 21
She's such a geek...
And I love it.
jjqnario 3 years ago 27
That was a great presentation. I think it was the best PowerPoint I've seen. Think of all the presentations you've been to with the charts, graphs and 20 bullet points per screen. That was top notch.
johbur2185 3 years ago 7
Best PP Presentation was in my opinion "Dave Gorman's Googlewhack Adventure"
KCH1985 3 years ago
Summary: Lexicography is description not prescription
It's not even lexicography101
applesongs 4 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
She is impossibly sexy. I'm sure I would get way too irritated with her to have any kind of relationship, but she's cute... ahh well.
teejers01 4 years ago
+1 and she even sounds like lacey chabert
8Dbaybled8D 3 years ago
Clickiness... hahahaa
cromicus 4 years ago
rather interesting. i had to watch this for my philosophy class a few days ago. uh.. yea.
seventoheaven 4 years ago
The jokes were cheap but yea.. she's kinda sexy. Also, wikipedia sucks but the internet always wins. Geeks ftw!
EntertainedWatcher 4 years ago
Talk nerdy to me. This chick is hot.
Leg0z 4 years ago 3
nice voice
LegendLength 2 years ago 7
'I'm a huge geek.' Its really awesome for somebody to admit that with such confidence.
jedaqia 4 years ago
Geek girls <3
Ah well she's probably married to a big oaf who's never read anything more challenging than a TV guide.
beautifulspam 4 years ago
wow, how is this the most entertaning vid! i can wach here all day.
cookiedrew 4 years ago
=D!! nah-uh I'm marrying her!!!
*sighs*
Fabricwarp 4 years ago
Though she makes some very good points, I don't know that I agree with her.
I've always viewed the dictionary as a formal standardization of language. A set of standards that we conform to in order to facilitate accurate communication between members of our society.
What she seems to be proposing is a sort of "wiki-reality", where as long as something is used in speech, it becomes part of speech.
AnarchyUnlimited 4 years ago 2
What's wrong with that idea? Conformity is what's holding us back, the limitless possibilities of the English language cannot be contained in the traditional model. I agree with her because every time i write a paper, most recently for my psychology class, i encounter words in articles that are undictionaried; they are, i must admit, an obsolete structure for the demarcation of our language.
PoeticJustice05 4 years ago 5
@AnarchyUnlimited It's a common misconception that lexicographers come up with definitions on their own and the speakers of the languages are a secondary authority to the dictionaries. It's actually the complete opposite - lexicographers study how speakers of a language use the word and derive the definition from them. That's why they must be updated, because language evolves. Lexicographers (and most linguists in general) are descriptivists, not prescriptivists.
sarcasticwhiteboard 9 months ago
@AnarchyUnlimited Strangely enough, your last sentence describes how language actually works. She's not proposing that it should to work that way, she's proposing that more people should have a deeper understanding of how language works.
sarcasticwhiteboard 9 months ago
Erin McKean neads to brush up on her lexicographical floccinaucinihilipilification skills!
WarzSchoolchild 4 years ago
Makes me want to guggle.
watzupdawg 4 years ago
Marry me, crazy dictionary lady!
mcnug 4 years ago
I wouldn't believe that talk about lexicography could be even remotely interesting, but now I believe it can :)
yancur 4 years ago 5
Very entertaining idea and wonderfully presented Ms McKean !
MasterMark123 4 years ago 2
Oh My Goodness !!
We need to make this woman a super-star.
tyrbolo 4 years ago
love how she compared the dictionary to steampunk
PolliFaxToaster 4 years ago 4
pedophile =loves children[there has to be a better word]
what does 'gay' mean
indiginous means sans culture[ie a plant can be indiginous but people cant]
aborigonal means the same as jew[belonging to the land]
of course there are many leci con versions that rewrite at whim, just as there are people using words to define things evil ,but hidden behind words[no child left behind]surge]incursion, friendly fire,civil war,neo[new]con,alternative medicine
oneundergod1 4 years ago
Friendly fire is not a euphemism though. "Friendly" is not being used as an adjective in the phrase; it is being used as a noun. The phrase means "fire from friendlies," a "friendly" being an allied soldier.
Foober 4 years ago
i enjoyed this video =]
i wonder if milf is in the dictionary
beefdlo 4 years ago
i love your posts.... they make me feel alive. I use them in my blogs and class room!
reivilo 4 years ago
dictionaryevangelist . com
Well worth a mouse motion to find your next neologisms.
JohnDeBunkTest 4 years ago 3
Hehe...
djthe1st 4 years ago