Thx 4 that. I've always wondered that. The Piaggio Avanti II has about the same weights with engines thermodynamically rated at 1630 shp and flat rated at 850 shp each, 85% the power of the Cheyenne 400! I think the Avanti II is derated the same way. Even though the Avanti II can cruise faster, the Cheyenne 400 seems 2 have a better take off n climb performance. Thx 4 the info.
That stand of wood about 500 ft inside of end of runway. That's awfully close. Seems like that could be considered a hazard. Also, at flight level 410, is that the recommended cruise altitude or is that the ceiling for this particular aircraft?
It's possible that it might produce 1650 hp 4 a short tjime. Can u tell me what the take off feels like? I'd love 2 know, thx. I've always wanted 2 fly in 1 of these.
It will excellerate extremely quick to tire rotation....it will get to altitude (up to 41000) in no time! many times ATC is shocked when they ask us to quickly get to altitude...they don't expect to see us there so quickly....very smooth aircraft...will land about as quick as take off too!
Ok thx, I've always wondered this. I have heard it's derated to 1000 shp rather than flat rated to 1000 shp. It still has around the power/weight ratio as a Saab 2000 though, which goes from 0-100 km/h in about 13 secs! Probably the rotation speed of the Cheyenne. It sounds similar 2 the Jetstream 41 but the Jetstream in continuously rated at around 1650 shp.
Correction, 0-180 km/h in about 13 seconds which I think is about the rotation speed of the Cheyenne. This aircraft still seems very fuel efficient for 1000 shp.
I am no expert on the mechanics of this machine, but know they are d rated too 1000hp, so I would imagine that is what you get out of them. Kind of seems like a shame that you are only using 70 percent. It makes for a long life engine though. The owner and the mechanic are the experts on the details of this bird. I am just lucky and blessed to sit in the right seat. (:
I do like that one can go 400 and get to a height of flight level 410...makes for a quick trip.
Nice video! I've got a few Jetstream 41 flight videos that I've had for years n I often pretend that they're Cheyenne 400 videos cause of engine similarity cause I didn't have any Cheyenne videos. This video is even more similar 2 a Jetstream 41 one due 2 both aircraft having 5 blade props. Can this aircraft still produce 1650 shp 4 take off even though it's flat rated at 1000 shp? Thx, great video.
The higher powered and significantly faster PA-42-1000 is basically a PA-42-720 with far more powerful 745kW (1000hp) Garrett TPE331 turboprops driving four blade, 106-inch diameter, composite-construction Dowty Rotol propellers. It's definitely got 2 legs up on the BAe J41 in climb performance.
That is one gorgeous hot rod. You're fling it and I'm not. GOD! I hate you! :-P Where were you guys flying out of??
Scrapheap71 3 hours ago
I loooove the 400ls. I fly a beech b100 also with garretts
santi22221 3 months ago
This one got To be top over 350 knots with those props installed?
pushitgently001p 7 months ago
@pushitgently001p
5 blades are for better climb and sound. They don't affect speed.
HDaviator 5 months ago
Hey, nice video. I was wondering, what is the takeoff roll at max takeoff weight?
xavier2511 7 months ago
@xavier2511 ...1000' -1300' where we are located...it gets up in a hurry
seekbowhunter 7 months ago
@seekbowhunter 1000' -1300' wow that is short thanks for the reply.
xavier2511 7 months ago
Is this aircraft based in MT I really hope I get to see it
1Gaumer 9 months ago
at 3.20...what is that red warning light?
zanfozanfani 1 year ago
did you often have deers on the track??
trafficdelta 1 year ago
Why did the Master Alarm sound at 1:34 short after take off?
Lettenbichler 1 year ago
@Lettenbichler Thats not the master alarm. Thats the radar altimeter which was set from the previous landing.
bman2101 8 months ago
@bman2101 now it makes sense :-) Thank you
Lettenbichler 8 months ago
Wow! 380 kts. thats smokin for a propjet.
MissyMicole23 1 year ago
great video of an excellent aircraft, thanks
camilogrillo 1 year ago
@B757ak: it means "No deer"
Balutheswabian 1 year ago
No gear?? Nice words 4 sec bevore landing
B757ak 1 year ago
@B757ak you miss understood the words...No Deer is what was said (:
seekbowhunter 1 year ago 2
@seekbowhunter Sorry, you're right.
B757ak 1 year ago
@seekbowhunter Hi, do you have any more videos of the 400ls? If you do please upload, its the best turboprop.
eminye1 1 year ago
@B757ak I agreed. before landing checklist is an optional....until "no gear" will be 4 seconds AFTER landing
zanfozanfani 1 year ago
Thx 4 that. I've always wondered that. The Piaggio Avanti II has about the same weights with engines thermodynamically rated at 1630 shp and flat rated at 850 shp each, 85% the power of the Cheyenne 400! I think the Avanti II is derated the same way. Even though the Avanti II can cruise faster, the Cheyenne 400 seems 2 have a better take off n climb performance. Thx 4 the info.
muz06 2 years ago
OH ok, so the 1650 hp can't b reached?
muz06 2 years ago
Great video
PRSOV 2 years ago
Can this aircraft produce 1650 shp each engine but flat rated at 1000 shp or is 1000 shp the maximum it can produce each engine? Thx.
muz06 2 years ago
no it is flat rated to 1000....it could go 1650
otherwise.
seekbowhunter 2 years ago
Ok, does this mean if u have the power levers set to maximum, it will produce 1650 shp each engine?
muz06 2 years ago
OMG Im inlove with this aircraft!! does it require type rating? cuz I read the Max gorss weight is 12050, I want to fly it some info please....!
gilz16 2 years ago
That stand of wood about 500 ft inside of end of runway. That's awfully close. Seems like that could be considered a hazard. Also, at flight level 410, is that the recommended cruise altitude or is that the ceiling for this particular aircraft?
rwalden2007 2 years ago
The stand of timber you are referring to isnt that big a deal...it is the deer that can be a problem...fl410 is the ceiling
olgalake 2 years ago
Excellent video and nice Cheyenne 400LS!
psb116 2 years ago
Thank you for Sharing this!!! I LOVE this aircraft!!!!
rayadomfdz 2 years ago
I prefer the cheyenne ii for it's takeoff and landing distances. At least in FSX I do :P
lolman5921 2 years ago
@lolman5921 The Cheyenne 400LS is the king of short field takeoff and landing distances. It can be stopped in under 1000 feet.
bman2101 8 months ago
It's possible that it might produce 1650 hp 4 a short tjime. Can u tell me what the take off feels like? I'd love 2 know, thx. I've always wanted 2 fly in 1 of these.
muz06 3 years ago
It will excellerate extremely quick to tire rotation....it will get to altitude (up to 41000) in no time! many times ATC is shocked when they ask us to quickly get to altitude...they don't expect to see us there so quickly....very smooth aircraft...will land about as quick as take off too!
seekbowhunter 3 years ago
Ok thx, I've always wondered this. I have heard it's derated to 1000 shp rather than flat rated to 1000 shp. It still has around the power/weight ratio as a Saab 2000 though, which goes from 0-100 km/h in about 13 secs! Probably the rotation speed of the Cheyenne. It sounds similar 2 the Jetstream 41 but the Jetstream in continuously rated at around 1650 shp.
muz06 3 years ago
Correction, 0-180 km/h in about 13 seconds which I think is about the rotation speed of the Cheyenne. This aircraft still seems very fuel efficient for 1000 shp.
muz06 3 years ago
I am no expert on the mechanics of this machine, but know they are d rated too 1000hp, so I would imagine that is what you get out of them. Kind of seems like a shame that you are only using 70 percent. It makes for a long life engine though. The owner and the mechanic are the experts on the details of this bird. I am just lucky and blessed to sit in the right seat. (:
I do like that one can go 400 and get to a height of flight level 410...makes for a quick trip.
seekbowhunter 3 years ago
Nice video! I've got a few Jetstream 41 flight videos that I've had for years n I often pretend that they're Cheyenne 400 videos cause of engine similarity cause I didn't have any Cheyenne videos. This video is even more similar 2 a Jetstream 41 one due 2 both aircraft having 5 blade props. Can this aircraft still produce 1650 shp 4 take off even though it's flat rated at 1000 shp? Thx, great video.
muz06 3 years ago
The higher powered and significantly faster PA-42-1000 is basically a PA-42-720 with far more powerful 745kW (1000hp) Garrett TPE331 turboprops driving four blade, 106-inch diameter, composite-construction Dowty Rotol propellers. It's definitely got 2 legs up on the BAe J41 in climb performance.
YakAV8R 2 years ago