1) the climate system does not have a tipping point! Dr. Lindzen proved that with 20 years of satellite data! The feedback is negative!
2) Dr.Miskolczi proved that the green house factor is: g=1/3; therefore there is no danger of warming as a result of CO2 concentration. The effect of water vapor dominates, CO2 does almost nothing.
3) Svensmark proved that, global temperatures are determined by the amount of cloud cover, which is seeded by galactic radiation.
So much for therealnews. This video is propaganda. There is no such thing as man made global warming. The ice in the Antarctic is up 43% and its getting colder. The latest German survey of the Arctic shows that the ice is much thicker than previously though.
If a person has to take 98 pills, 84 inhaler puffs, and 28 breathing treatments per week just to breathe at all due to the pollution caused by a refinery, as in my case, then perhaps you can begin to see the problem. I have had to take pills every day to breathe since June 1971. The big polluters need to pay NOW. I also had to take many multiple courses of the corticosteroid Prednisone for breathing. I lift weights and now weigh 292 pounds. I look a little like Batista or The Undertaker.
Start reading issues of MMWR, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, the medical journal, for more on the dangers of soot and particulates in the air and what they do to your lungs, even if you refuse to believe it (that your lungs are adversely affected). You want to disagree with all of those doctors and scientists?
Tha atmosphere is heating up but that is not what is the most important thing. Personally I do not mind getting warmed up but this will adversely affect crops and cause mass human migrations that none of us want. The real danger is the soot in the air. Global warming is nothing compared to that. If you dare to disagree with me then perhaps you should know that you disagree with the American Medical Association and many other medical org's that have long proven the dangers of soot.
The TRUTH IS that coal emissions are EXTREMELY HARMFUL TO LUNGS--and you people who deny global warming cannot deny centuries of medical evidence. Anyone who denies us our clean air IS a criminal against us all. With windpower and solar power ALONE we can get rid of coal completely (and research until we have fusion,Tesla Technology, et cetera online). A dirty job is not worth billions losing any possibility of breathing clean air.
That's not really as important, although there are reams of evidence that it is caused by pollution (not simply humans, but by the polluting humans), as far more important are the reams of evidence that illness and death are caused by burning things, including cigarettes, coal, wood, charcoal briquettes, dung, etc., found in MMWR, the medical journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. If you disagree with that, then you disagree with medical doctors from all over the USA and the world.
Humans have been cooking food with campfires for countless generations 40,000+ years, with a high, close proximity exposure to "burning things" as you put.
Your argument is totally piss weak. Forest fires and volcanoes have been a part of nature forever. You cannot control that, nor should you try. Co2 levels in the atmosphere have not been shown to drive climate change, which is what we are talking about now.
If you want to see evidence, get an education so you can look at the data that is available and understand it, instead of parroting political agenda jargon.
Wow, @ 1:40 "should be tried for crimes against humanity and nature"...no wonder radical socialist Obama picked him to be his "science" man, this guy's a big time extremist.
godscuttingyoudown, you should know that there is no such thing as absoloute certainty. Even in this video they did not say 100% sure they said 99.9%. So if you are 99.9% sure of your statement, than there is one chance in 1,000 that you are wrong and that man-made global warming IS happening with terrible consequences. Only 1% of national GDP is necessary to reverse global warming. Isn't that a small price to pay even if there is only one chance in 1,000 that we are right?
Just because one crazy guy is 99.9% sure of something doesn't mean squat. I happen to be 99.99% sure that global warming is only a man-made hoax. I am totally unwilling to waste $138,000,000,000 dollars a year on this BS.
I'm glad that Hansen has such strong predictions that will unfortunately take a couple decades to be proven a complete mockery of science. At least they are out there now so that he will not be able to deny that he was wrong when the time comes.
Unlike his previous stance for cooling.
I just hope his up commence comes sooner than later, so we can get on with real science again. Unfortunately there will probably be another highway robber who will come along and try to steal real science again
global warming is a myth volcano's alone put out 6 trillion tons of co2 and man made co2 is only 4 trillion tons, animals and decaying life puts out more co2 than people
scientist from UK and NASA have said off the record that the sun is getting hotter because the solar system is entering the Orion arm of the galaxy and is being bombarded with photon radiation.
The Polluters will go to very great lengths to cloud the truth, which is that they are causing deaths from lung disease now and have for hundreds of years. The Universe will have the final say and people who say that global warming is a myth will be proven wrong even to themselves soon (they already were hundreds of times over to everybody else in the last 26 years). Breathe deeply this summer!!!
this is the NEW WORLD ORDER, illuminati, and masons plan to enslave man by creating a fake crisis youtube these vids and see the truth 1. jordan maxwell 2. The Alex Jones Show - DEATH OF THE INTERNET 3. end game 4. william cooper 5. micheal tsarion 6. esoteric agenda 7. david icke 8. ring of power 9. dr deagle 10. Codex Alimentarius - Making it illegal to eat well 11. planet x nibiru
I'm European and ashamed of our behavior. We should divide our standard of living by 2 or 5 or 10 but we prefer betting on the survival of humankind and/or say the others have to deal with the mess first. People open your eyes, the civilized world destroys, and we are exterminating the future of our followers (more insane is impossible). What kind of human can do that? Are we human to do a thing like that? No, we are no more ... We are me, me, me ... now, now, now ... The end.
It is not a zero sum gain. People that produce the most should get the most. That is life. If it were the other way around, we'd already all be dead! If you don't produce anything, give me all of your money. Otherwise, shut up.
If you produce something by poisoning our breathing air, then YOU are a criminal!!! PERIOD. Clean energy does not do that. Only coal and the likes of fossil fuels do.
I am referring to people who wholesale burn coal and very dirty stuff like that in very large quantities, and not you personally. Sorry. I mean that people who are poisoning our air on this very large scale are criminals. I am willing to bet that there are fewer than 144,000 true polluters by this definition in the world (the bigtime polluters, who don't care about you any more than they care about me nor anyone else, I am sorry to say). The atmosphere is heating up for sure though.
Hansen claims "99.9% certainty that 350ppm is unsafe"? Well in response to that, I'm 99.99% sure Hansen is spouting 96.7652% BS. This guy is a real piece of work.
Google "global warming or Global Governance" for a plausible story behind the man made warming. It's a free one hour documentary that may open your eyes.
In 1971, Hansen was screaming "Ice age". There were ideas to spread coal dust on the ice caps to retard the advancing ice sheet. Now he is firmly in the other camp and says that we are going to die from heat instead of cold.
Hansen was dead wrong in 1971 but he is a Messiah now?
In addition, there are numerous scientists who now espouse global cooling again. There has been no temp increase in the last decade and solar cycle 24 is yet to appear. Sunspot activity is nil. So who is right?
They go after the little guy, the consumer, for carbon tax... It's not the little guy who is killing the planet, its the giant factories and corporations.
Killing? KILLING the planet? If you think that these insignificant pissants called humans can have that much of an effect on the planet then why not send a small army of them down to Chile and have them put out that volcano that is spewing poison into the atmosphere and "killing the planet". That should be a relatively simple task given the fact that the problem is local and not planetary. After all, how hard can it be to plug a big hole in the ground anyway?
if it is so important to spend money on this issue, why dont they cut the pork that already exsists in areas of government, and direct it to prevent AGW? they would rather spend the money on useless shit in this slow shitty fucking bureaucracy. cut your spending if you believe in it so much.
global warming is nothing but a NWO SHAM , just another way of how to invade a country, or to suppress its development!!! Must see:"the great global warming Swindle" documentary !!! or maybe check an average biology book on what our atmosphere consists of...!! you ll get the picture...
Watch for a carbon-tax to be the first form of official worldwide taxation. They can't blame it all on child pornography, so they need a global "crisis" like this to be able to sell the idea of global governance/taxation.
This guy is a communist - wanting to criminalize anybody who opposes his views. He has gone off the deep end. How about we press charges against all leading democrats for crimes against humanity - for purposely misinforming and misdirecting the public. Same difference.
He wasn't stating that all Republicans had done something criminal. The charge was to the senior executives in particular industries, and the parallel was to what was done by tobacco companies. But despite the headline on the clip, this is the scientist's secondary point. He mainly wants action now in terms of a coal plant moratorium.
I'm asking that is the buying up more years by evading the laws by big corporations due to the freedom of the market or restricting things aside the free market system.
What is needed as much as massive production of clean energy is the ability to hold, move, and store clean convertable energy. Not long term, short term. We have storage batteries, we could have heat reservoirs, there is the possibility of energy cells. Probably overlooked until now would be pneumatic or air pressure storage. The point is capture of energy when it can be captured and saving it for times that it cannot be captured. We could capture the cold and heat in personal water tanks.
There are engineering and thermo dynamic solutions that could seriously decentralize the energy industry and turn the average homeowner into an energy producer and storage facility. It would mean clean energy for cars. As well, there is something that could be done with the Mississippi river in terms of bio energy and flood plane control. Right now it is all in the hands of opportunist users, who are trying to make up reasons to invade another coiuntry with substantial reserves.
I like how these people can cite observations that the Earth is in a warming period, and then in the same breath they presuppose that you'll be sold that the warming is due to CO2, hoping you'll rely on a Hollywood production with a few charts as proof.
My number One concern living on this planet is not carbon emissions! It's the people in control of the HARRP facility and the endless amount of chemtrails being admitted in the atmosphere over so many countries!
Ummm, yeah I think there's a ton more studies and evidence than what appeared in Gore's film. Just because that's the information that most people know doesn't mean that's the only proof around.
Kathryn, I understand what he was saying. He is trying to criminalize not believing in man made global warming. That would be much the same as criminalizing any other opposing points of view. If somebody does not agree with you, put them in jail. It would be the same as criminalizing the point of view that there is a God.
The only thing man made about global warming is that it is a man made up idea. It is a hoax.
I'm not saying I agree with him, but I don't think that's what he's saying. He's advocating that actively distorting science could be a crime similar to distorting evidence of something being carcinogenic. It's not whether an executive personally believed something, but rather whether they did anything fraudulent to influence what the public believes.
I am so glad I found your video! It's great!!!
carolalouge 3 months ago
Safe level of co2 350ppm and plant growth shuts down at 150ppm. Abrupt cooling is now more likely than warming due to the grand solar minimum.
david222444 6 months ago
public transportation can slash oil consumption
KentAllard 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hansen should go to jail!
1) the climate system does not have a tipping point! Dr. Lindzen proved that with 20 years of satellite data! The feedback is negative!
2) Dr.Miskolczi proved that the green house factor is: g=1/3; therefore there is no danger of warming as a result of CO2 concentration. The effect of water vapor dominates, CO2 does almost nothing.
3) Svensmark proved that, global temperatures are determined by the amount of cloud cover, which is seeded by galactic radiation.
judomagyar 1 year ago
Yes! Put the anti-science fuckers on trail, starting with their chief propogandist senator Inhofe
Tapecutter59 1 year ago 3
With the sudden and catastrophic collapse of the IPCC and global warming community as a whole, this video post is now actually very amusing.
AtlasObjectivist 2 years ago
Get an education equal to that of a scientist and THEN look at the evidence. Don't parrot the nonsense political agenda has spoon-fed you.
bridgettedunn 2 years ago
It is a damn crime. A crime against every species and ecosystem on the planet.
bridgettedunn 2 years ago
So much for therealnews. This video is propaganda. There is no such thing as man made global warming. The ice in the Antarctic is up 43% and its getting colder. The latest German survey of the Arctic shows that the ice is much thicker than previously though.
sarrass1 2 years ago
If a person has to take 98 pills, 84 inhaler puffs, and 28 breathing treatments per week just to breathe at all due to the pollution caused by a refinery, as in my case, then perhaps you can begin to see the problem. I have had to take pills every day to breathe since June 1971. The big polluters need to pay NOW. I also had to take many multiple courses of the corticosteroid Prednisone for breathing. I lift weights and now weigh 292 pounds. I look a little like Batista or The Undertaker.
IQ136 2 years ago
Now I weigh 298 pounds.
IQ136 2 years ago
Start reading issues of MMWR, the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, the medical journal, for more on the dangers of soot and particulates in the air and what they do to your lungs, even if you refuse to believe it (that your lungs are adversely affected). You want to disagree with all of those doctors and scientists?
IQ136 2 years ago
Tha atmosphere is heating up but that is not what is the most important thing. Personally I do not mind getting warmed up but this will adversely affect crops and cause mass human migrations that none of us want. The real danger is the soot in the air. Global warming is nothing compared to that. If you dare to disagree with me then perhaps you should know that you disagree with the American Medical Association and many other medical org's that have long proven the dangers of soot.
IQ136 2 years ago
The TRUTH IS that coal emissions are EXTREMELY HARMFUL TO LUNGS--and you people who deny global warming cannot deny centuries of medical evidence. Anyone who denies us our clean air IS a criminal against us all. With windpower and solar power ALONE we can get rid of coal completely (and research until we have fusion,Tesla Technology, et cetera online). A dirty job is not worth billions losing any possibility of breathing clean air.
IQ136 2 years ago
Lets see some evidence that global warming is caused by humans.
Rotpig 2 years ago
That's not really as important, although there are reams of evidence that it is caused by pollution (not simply humans, but by the polluting humans), as far more important are the reams of evidence that illness and death are caused by burning things, including cigarettes, coal, wood, charcoal briquettes, dung, etc., found in MMWR, the medical journal Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. If you disagree with that, then you disagree with medical doctors from all over the USA and the world.
IQ136 2 years ago
Humans have been cooking food with campfires for countless generations 40,000+ years, with a high, close proximity exposure to "burning things" as you put.
Your argument is totally piss weak. Forest fires and volcanoes have been a part of nature forever. You cannot control that, nor should you try. Co2 levels in the atmosphere have not been shown to drive climate change, which is what we are talking about now.
Rotpig 2 years ago
If you want to see evidence, get an education so you can look at the data that is available and understand it, instead of parroting political agenda jargon.
bridgettedunn 2 years ago
RF = 5.35*ln(C2/C1) - Fourier 1824.
Tapecutter59 1 year ago
Wow, @ 1:40 "should be tried for crimes against humanity and nature"...no wonder radical socialist Obama picked him to be his "science" man, this guy's a big time extremist.
EncompassedRunner 2 years ago
The debate is NOT over, James Hansen is a government subsidized LIAR!
Google: James Hansen Liar
randyguitarman13 3 years ago
Donate Now, how fitting since the whole global warming scam is about getting YOUR money, either thru donations or taxes
jeffmay1 3 years ago
godscuttingyoudown, you should know that there is no such thing as absoloute certainty. Even in this video they did not say 100% sure they said 99.9%. So if you are 99.9% sure of your statement, than there is one chance in 1,000 that you are wrong and that man-made global warming IS happening with terrible consequences. Only 1% of national GDP is necessary to reverse global warming. Isn't that a small price to pay even if there is only one chance in 1,000 that we are right?
nic0ftime 3 years ago 2
Just because one crazy guy is 99.9% sure of something doesn't mean squat. I happen to be 99.99% sure that global warming is only a man-made hoax. I am totally unwilling to waste $138,000,000,000 dollars a year on this BS.
mrchestypuller 3 years ago
exactly, and the Artic Ice sheet has actually grown in the last five years, hopefully the lies will stop soon.
jeffmay1 3 years ago
I'm glad that Hansen has such strong predictions that will unfortunately take a couple decades to be proven a complete mockery of science. At least they are out there now so that he will not be able to deny that he was wrong when the time comes.
Unlike his previous stance for cooling.
I just hope his up commence comes sooner than later, so we can get on with real science again. Unfortunately there will probably be another highway robber who will come along and try to steal real science again
beaminup 2 years ago
an inconvenient truth is a convenient lie
global warming is a myth volcano's alone put out 6 trillion tons of co2 and man made co2 is only 4 trillion tons, animals and decaying life puts out more co2 than people
scientist from UK and NASA have said off the record that the sun is getting hotter because the solar system is entering the Orion arm of the galaxy and is being bombarded with photon radiation.
godscuttingyoudown 3 years ago
The Polluters will go to very great lengths to cloud the truth, which is that they are causing deaths from lung disease now and have for hundreds of years. The Universe will have the final say and people who say that global warming is a myth will be proven wrong even to themselves soon (they already were hundreds of times over to everybody else in the last 26 years). Breathe deeply this summer!!!
IQ136 2 years ago
godscuttingyoudown 3 years ago
I'm European and ashamed of our behavior. We should divide our standard of living by 2 or 5 or 10 but we prefer betting on the survival of humankind and/or say the others have to deal with the mess first. People open your eyes, the civilized world destroys, and we are exterminating the future of our followers (more insane is impossible). What kind of human can do that? Are we human to do a thing like that? No, we are no more ... We are me, me, me ... now, now, now ... The end.
human1554215465 3 years ago
You must be kidding - give me all of your money!
It is not a zero sum gain. People that produce the most should get the most. That is life. If it were the other way around, we'd already all be dead! If you don't produce anything, give me all of your money. Otherwise, shut up.
mrchestypuller 3 years ago
If you produce something by poisoning our breathing air, then YOU are a criminal!!! PERIOD. Clean energy does not do that. Only coal and the likes of fossil fuels do.
IQ136 2 years ago
You produce carbon dioxide. We should lock your ass up. The next ice age will come, and there is nothing you or anybody else can do about it.
mrchestypuller 2 years ago
I am referring to people who wholesale burn coal and very dirty stuff like that in very large quantities, and not you personally. Sorry. I mean that people who are poisoning our air on this very large scale are criminals. I am willing to bet that there are fewer than 144,000 true polluters by this definition in the world (the bigtime polluters, who don't care about you any more than they care about me nor anyone else, I am sorry to say). The atmosphere is heating up for sure though.
IQ136 2 years ago
Good video Peter; you are one of the only few real thinkers here on you tube. There are many clueless people and neo-sophists here on you tube.
pythagoras9 3 years ago
World Government and Control.
chewbaca1989 3 years ago 2
@chewbaca1989
fossil fuel PR
KentAllard 1 year ago
Hansen claims "99.9% certainty that 350ppm is unsafe"? Well in response to that, I'm 99.99% sure Hansen is spouting 96.7652% BS. This guy is a real piece of work.
Google "global warming or Global Governance" for a plausible story behind the man made warming. It's a free one hour documentary that may open your eyes.
danmcc22 3 years ago
In 1971, Hansen was screaming "Ice age". There were ideas to spread coal dust on the ice caps to retard the advancing ice sheet. Now he is firmly in the other camp and says that we are going to die from heat instead of cold.
Hansen was dead wrong in 1971 but he is a Messiah now?
In addition, there are numerous scientists who now espouse global cooling again. There has been no temp increase in the last decade and solar cycle 24 is yet to appear. Sunspot activity is nil. So who is right?
jimpeel 3 years ago 2
BS! Hansen didnt "scream ice age"!!
stopglobalwarming08 3 years ago
They go after the little guy, the consumer, for carbon tax... It's not the little guy who is killing the planet, its the giant factories and corporations.
ilovesdgc 3 years ago
Killing? KILLING the planet? If you think that these insignificant pissants called humans can have that much of an effect on the planet then why not send a small army of them down to Chile and have them put out that volcano that is spewing poison into the atmosphere and "killing the planet". That should be a relatively simple task given the fact that the problem is local and not planetary. After all, how hard can it be to plug a big hole in the ground anyway?
jimpeel 3 years ago 2
if it is so important to spend money on this issue, why dont they cut the pork that already exsists in areas of government, and direct it to prevent AGW? they would rather spend the money on useless shit in this slow shitty fucking bureaucracy. cut your spending if you believe in it so much.
disciplinemisanthrop 3 years ago 2
global warming is nothing but a NWO SHAM , just another way of how to invade a country, or to suppress its development!!! Must see:"the great global warming Swindle" documentary !!! or maybe check an average biology book on what our atmosphere consists of...!! you ll get the picture...
tepstolog 3 years ago 2
tell that to the inuit.
FattKidd 3 years ago
Extreme climate changes have happened before tell it to the Hohokam, Anasazi, Fremont, of the American Southwest.
chewbaca1989 3 years ago 2
awesome vid! thanks!
stopglobalwarming08 3 years ago
Drive less with a more efficient vehicle. Plant kudzu, hemp, or any other fast growing leafy plant. Vote in public servants who care.
meeputube 3 years ago
Watch for a carbon-tax to be the first form of official worldwide taxation. They can't blame it all on child pornography, so they need a global "crisis" like this to be able to sell the idea of global governance/taxation.
Welcome to your New World Order...
lastnymleft 3 years ago
This guy is a communist - wanting to criminalize anybody who opposes his views. He has gone off the deep end. How about we press charges against all leading democrats for crimes against humanity - for purposely misinforming and misdirecting the public. Same difference.
mrchestypuller 3 years ago
He wasn't stating that all Republicans had done something criminal. The charge was to the senior executives in particular industries, and the parallel was to what was done by tobacco companies. But despite the headline on the clip, this is the scientist's secondary point. He mainly wants action now in terms of a coal plant moratorium.
GrownupPhan 3 years ago
People talk about co2 and NEVER talk about the lessening of Oxygen in the air
odin422 3 years ago
Do you all think that this is due to the free market, or is due to the restricting things on the free market?
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
You should elaborate on what you mean exactly by "all of this."
immanent 3 years ago
I'm asking that is the buying up more years by evading the laws by big corporations due to the freedom of the market or restricting things aside the free market system.
teemuruskeepaa 3 years ago
What is needed as much as massive production of clean energy is the ability to hold, move, and store clean convertable energy. Not long term, short term. We have storage batteries, we could have heat reservoirs, there is the possibility of energy cells. Probably overlooked until now would be pneumatic or air pressure storage. The point is capture of energy when it can be captured and saving it for times that it cannot be captured. We could capture the cold and heat in personal water tanks.
hypnofan35 3 years ago
There are engineering and thermo dynamic solutions that could seriously decentralize the energy industry and turn the average homeowner into an energy producer and storage facility. It would mean clean energy for cars. As well, there is something that could be done with the Mississippi river in terms of bio energy and flood plane control. Right now it is all in the hands of opportunist users, who are trying to make up reasons to invade another coiuntry with substantial reserves.
hypnofan35 3 years ago
I like how these people can cite observations that the Earth is in a warming period, and then in the same breath they presuppose that you'll be sold that the warming is due to CO2, hoping you'll rely on a Hollywood production with a few charts as proof.
Plant food is killing us all! Oh noes!
immanent 3 years ago 2
My number One concern living on this planet is not carbon emissions! It's the people in control of the HARRP facility and the endless amount of chemtrails being admitted in the atmosphere over so many countries!
jmaros15 3 years ago
Ummm, yeah I think there's a ton more studies and evidence than what appeared in Gore's film. Just because that's the information that most people know doesn't mean that's the only proof around.
GrownupPhan 3 years ago
GrownupPhan
Kathryn, I understand what he was saying. He is trying to criminalize not believing in man made global warming. That would be much the same as criminalizing any other opposing points of view. If somebody does not agree with you, put them in jail. It would be the same as criminalizing the point of view that there is a God.
The only thing man made about global warming is that it is a man made up idea. It is a hoax.
mrchestypuller 3 years ago
I'm not saying I agree with him, but I don't think that's what he's saying. He's advocating that actively distorting science could be a crime similar to distorting evidence of something being carcinogenic. It's not whether an executive personally believed something, but rather whether they did anything fraudulent to influence what the public believes.
GrownupPhan 3 years ago
GrownupPhan
Then he should be talking about putting AlGore in jail - for the lies he packed into his "documentary" about global warming.
mrchestypuller 3 years ago
oh boy......
turkeyjurker 3 years ago