Richard Gage's salary in 2009 from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. That's according to the 2009 Form 990-EZ available right now at GuidestarDOTorg, an online organization that helps track non-profits.
The total revenue for 2009 -- $344,570. Salaries for Gage and others topped out at $107,417. That means salaries constitute 31% of AE911Truth's expenses.
In other words, Richard Gage's salary is 21% of all revenue received by AE911Truth in 2009.
be sure to check out the FEMA report appendix C found here
fema gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc pdf
which concludes "The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 [from WTC 7] and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown."
That footage is from a PBS doumentary called Rebuilding America and it is not just firefighters but engineers inthe doco complaining that the greatest problem of the clean-up has been the molten steel and they even show what was coined THE METEORITE and they are standing in front of it complaining about the molten steel. I mean, fuck off. Fuck off. FUCK OFF. I am over it. 10 years later? FUCK OFF>
America Rebuilds. That is the name of the documentary. PBS 2002. Engineers on site complaning about molten steel - everyone in the doco, firefighters, doctors of medicine, first responders - the fucking molten steel is the problem they complain.
And regarding the paper "published" by the open journal I can't really comment yet as I still have to read the article. However if this is the smoking gun evidence that Gage and others claim it to be why hasn't the scientific community risen in support of the "truthers"? I think the silence of the experts speaks volumes. Yes I know of the 700 or so architects on gages site but compare that go the 80k app in the us alone.
Exactly where is my knowledge lacking? I believe you brought up conservation of momentum..and you are now trying to distance yourself from that comment. As for newton's third law (which you simply call newtons law) yes I know it well. In the case of wtc 7 I believe the interior structure collapsed first thus it was not there to offer resistance when the outer structure fell.
1:45 - Wow. For years I've thought I was the only one that heard the news report on the day of 911 where they actually said that they were going to demolish WTC7. It's extraordinary (and frustrating) that nobody has a recording of that report.
To eriksz. I don't recall asking for a URL just the name of the journal. In any case I have found a paper dealing with the thermite accusations and ,much to my surprise, it was posted on a truther website. Nothing on 9/11 was normal and I don't believe I made that claim. What I did say is in accordance with newtons laws and Please tell me how conservation of momentum plays in here...this is very amusing.
1,000 of the world's leading architects? I guess he's referring to the list, which it seems anyone can sign, on Gages website.
And let me just clarify for all of you laymen out there.Richard Gage is not a scientist (anyone doubting this should listen to his misguided, naïve and downright incorrect views regarding Newtons Laws and conservation of momentum. See Mark Roberts / Gage hardfire debate).
To Eriksz "..I guess you don't hear too good" I think you mean well.
Anyway I never said that Gage said he's a scientist. However, he certainly presents himself as one when speaking about chemistry/physics (again he is not an expert on either).
No, in fact anyone can quote a source....anyone. The key is that an actual scientist can tell the difference between real science and pseudoscience. And congrats you avoided namecalling on your last post :)
I've heard claims made about thermite this and that...which scientific journal is it exactly that has published these results? Is it a reputable journal? The residue of which you speak is it actual thermite or simply compounds that may or may not be the result of the use of thermite? The 2.2 seconds (I assume you're referring to WTC 7) of free fall makes perfect sense if you account for the possibility that the inner structure collapsed (partially at least) before the outer facade.
You don't nead to hear ANY claims you just need to look at the PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL that covers that subject and then you can become informed instead of talking nonsense on youtube. You know I can;t link URLS here, so use your supreme internet skills and find it.
And NO! 2.2 seconds of free fall and NEAR FREE FALL for the rest of the collapse is NOT NORMAL and cannot be explained by the official story at all, in spite of what you say. Look up, Newton's Law of the Conservation of Momentum.
Why did you send me a personal comment and not reply on here. In any case you sent me to The Open Chemical Physics Journal? Perhaps no one has responded because no one takes it seriously....doesn't seem like the most rigorous format (open access that is). I know, I know the Open journal purports to be peer reviewed but that seems a bit dubious to me. I'm going to read the article but in the meantime why don't you tell me more about conservation of momentum and how it applies here.
You're always making up excuses for your lack of knowledge and having to backtrack every comment, it's a shame someone like you has fallen to the Cognitive Dissonance Dark side. Now that you have seen the PEER REVIEWED journal, you makup shit about that also.
As for Newtons law, in a nutshell, something colliding with an object receives the equal amount of force back from that object. FREE FALL IS IMPOSSIBLE in WTC7. Fact. You fail again Physman
"I guess he's referring to the list, which it seems anyone can sign, on Gages website."
Wrong. These have all been individually verified as fully qualified architects or engineers. They have separate petitions for students and another one that anyone can sign.
The more we can bring to light the facts about 9/11, the more chance we have of ending the illegal wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and now Pakistan. Millions of people have died and are suffering due to the horrendous lie of 9/11. People all over the world are calling for a new investigation. Follow your heart and stand up for the truth.
About time the mainstream are starting to ask questions & give "Truthers" a go after having swallowed the official line for so many years like nicely well trained puppets
kissinger oversaw our new oversized parliament who is in on the 911 & all they all make money from medicines bought & the vaccines they put the live viruses in to get u sick in first place,. thank God Australia Waking up ,. Use the Constitution tht was stripd frm our schools in 75 roughly same time whitlam got sacked for treason & birng justice to ilegal statues & help return australia to way it was b4 globilisation. dont let thm diminish world pop to 500mill.
youtube
GAGE TVNZ
Building 7
Gage Utzon
Gage WSFM
Thomas-Scott Gordon knew that the Twin Towers were ear-marked
for early de-commissioning by as early as 2007 due to galvanic corrosion (aluminium-steel) , and he knew this as early as 1989.
vv vv vv dot 911oz dot c om search Thomas Gordon
blavatsky3 1 year ago
who did 9/11?
MrLeeman11 1 year ago
@MrLeeman11 You tell me and we'll both know.
Eriksz 1 year ago
@MrLeeman11 mossad?
MsCandyClaws 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrLeeman11 Criminal Neo-con zionist elements within the US Government?
rdicko86 1 year ago
Clearly
The emperor is NAKED!
Arrest the emperor for
INDECENT EXPOSURE!
Charlie666XZ 1 year ago
Never again. Not on my watch. These people must be hung.
Focoist911 2 years ago
*hanged
thebystander 1 year ago
they removed all memory of this from their radio website. The big jew came in and made sure of it.
Focoist911 2 years ago
Dude, the Richard Gage interview is in three areas of the WSFM site. So what are you talking about?
Eriksz 2 years ago
Oh it only took them 8 fucking years and a million dead Iraqis before they considered it. The job is done.
Focoist911 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
$75,450
Richard Gage's salary in 2009 from Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. That's according to the 2009 Form 990-EZ available right now at GuidestarDOTorg, an online organization that helps track non-profits.
The total revenue for 2009 -- $344,570. Salaries for Gage and others topped out at $107,417. That means salaries constitute 31% of AE911Truth's expenses.
In other words, Richard Gage's salary is 21% of all revenue received by AE911Truth in 2009.
911 TRUTH = MADMONEY
ctcole77 1 year ago
Dear Physman2011,
be sure to check out the FEMA report appendix C found here
fema gov/pdf/library/fema403_apc pdf
which concludes "The severe corrosion and subsequent erosion of Samples 1 [from WTC 7] and 2 are a very unusual event. No clear explanation for the source of the sulfur has been identified. The rate of corrosion is also unknown."
WinstonSmithsBrain 2 years ago
and also witness the firefighters describing molten steel flowing like lava here /watch?v=cCdRA09pztM
Then watch this segment of 'loose change final cut' to see NIST deny the existence of molten metal at ground zero
/watch?v=Yr5yJmBgG9E#t=05m56s
Regards.
WinstonSmithsBrain 2 years ago
That footage is from a PBS doumentary called Rebuilding America and it is not just firefighters but engineers inthe doco complaining that the greatest problem of the clean-up has been the molten steel and they even show what was coined THE METEORITE and they are standing in front of it complaining about the molten steel. I mean, fuck off. Fuck off. FUCK OFF. I am over it. 10 years later? FUCK OFF>
Focoist911 2 years ago
America Rebuilds. That is the name of the documentary. PBS 2002. Engineers on site complaning about molten steel - everyone in the doco, firefighters, doctors of medicine, first responders - the fucking molten steel is the problem they complain.
Focoist911 2 years ago
Actually the number is closer to 95k architects in the united states. Please tell me that "I fail" again...I really enjoy that. Thanks :)
Physman2011 2 years ago
YOU... fail again.
Eriksz 2 years ago
And regarding the paper "published" by the open journal I can't really comment yet as I still have to read the article. However if this is the smoking gun evidence that Gage and others claim it to be why hasn't the scientific community risen in support of the "truthers"? I think the silence of the experts speaks volumes. Yes I know of the 700 or so architects on gages site but compare that go the 80k app in the us alone.
Physman2011 2 years ago
Exactly where is my knowledge lacking? I believe you brought up conservation of momentum..and you are now trying to distance yourself from that comment. As for newton's third law (which you simply call newtons law) yes I know it well. In the case of wtc 7 I believe the interior structure collapsed first thus it was not there to offer resistance when the outer structure fell.
Physman2011 2 years ago
1:45 - Wow. For years I've thought I was the only one that heard the news report on the day of 911 where they actually said that they were going to demolish WTC7. It's extraordinary (and frustrating) that nobody has a recording of that report.
vidmanx0 2 years ago
To eriksz. I don't recall asking for a URL just the name of the journal. In any case I have found a paper dealing with the thermite accusations and ,much to my surprise, it was posted on a truther website. Nothing on 9/11 was normal and I don't believe I made that claim. What I did say is in accordance with newtons laws and Please tell me how conservation of momentum plays in here...this is very amusing.
Physman2011 2 years ago
1,000 of the world's leading architects? I guess he's referring to the list, which it seems anyone can sign, on Gages website.
And let me just clarify for all of you laymen out there.Richard Gage is not a scientist (anyone doubting this should listen to his misguided, naïve and downright incorrect views regarding Newtons Laws and conservation of momentum. See Mark Roberts / Gage hardfire debate).
Physman2011 2 years ago
Dumbass. Anyone can sign the petition, but only architects are counted.
He never said he was a scientist, he's an Architect, I guess you don't hear too good. Dumbass.
Eriksz 2 years ago
To Eriksz "..I guess you don't hear too good" I think you mean well.
Anyway I never said that Gage said he's a scientist. However, he certainly presents himself as one when speaking about chemistry/physics (again he is not an expert on either).
Physman2011 2 years ago
You don't have to be a scientist to Quote a peer reviewed science journal, do you now?
Good effort Physman... but you fail again.
Eriksz 2 years ago
To Eriksz
No, in fact anyone can quote a source....anyone. The key is that an actual scientist can tell the difference between real science and pseudoscience. And congrats you avoided namecalling on your last post :)
Physman2011 2 years ago
There has been no counter to the Peer Reviewed science journal that shows thermitic residue in the WTC dust.
You can't have 2.2 seconds of free fall at the WTC7 Building unless ALL the core columns had been cut. This is real science and physics.
Keep it up but you fail again.
Eriksz 2 years ago
I've heard claims made about thermite this and that...which scientific journal is it exactly that has published these results? Is it a reputable journal? The residue of which you speak is it actual thermite or simply compounds that may or may not be the result of the use of thermite? The 2.2 seconds (I assume you're referring to WTC 7) of free fall makes perfect sense if you account for the possibility that the inner structure collapsed (partially at least) before the outer facade.
Physman2011 2 years ago
You don't nead to hear ANY claims you just need to look at the PEER REVIEWED JOURNAL that covers that subject and then you can become informed instead of talking nonsense on youtube. You know I can;t link URLS here, so use your supreme internet skills and find it.
And NO! 2.2 seconds of free fall and NEAR FREE FALL for the rest of the collapse is NOT NORMAL and cannot be explained by the official story at all, in spite of what you say. Look up, Newton's Law of the Conservation of Momentum.
Eriksz 2 years ago
To Eriksz
Why did you send me a personal comment and not reply on here. In any case you sent me to The Open Chemical Physics Journal? Perhaps no one has responded because no one takes it seriously....doesn't seem like the most rigorous format (open access that is). I know, I know the Open journal purports to be peer reviewed but that seems a bit dubious to me. I'm going to read the article but in the meantime why don't you tell me more about conservation of momentum and how it applies here.
Physman2011 2 years ago
You're always making up excuses for your lack of knowledge and having to backtrack every comment, it's a shame someone like you has fallen to the Cognitive Dissonance Dark side. Now that you have seen the PEER REVIEWED journal, you makup shit about that also.
As for Newtons law, in a nutshell, something colliding with an object receives the equal amount of force back from that object. FREE FALL IS IMPOSSIBLE in WTC7. Fact. You fail again Physman
Eriksz 2 years ago
"I guess he's referring to the list, which it seems anyone can sign, on Gages website."
Wrong. These have all been individually verified as fully qualified architects or engineers. They have separate petitions for students and another one that anyone can sign.
vidmanx0 2 years ago
The more we can bring to light the facts about 9/11, the more chance we have of ending the illegal wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and now Pakistan. Millions of people have died and are suffering due to the horrendous lie of 9/11. People all over the world are calling for a new investigation. Follow your heart and stand up for the truth.
delenagaffney 2 years ago
main stream coverage
at last!
i am sure the owners of this station put their necks on the line
thank you
your courage is admirable
thank you
lethal1960 2 years ago
Thanks for getting this up so fast:-) Love your work! 5 star, favourited.
sodaphine 2 years ago
BULLZEIT!!!
TheBullzeitgeist 2 years ago
ho hum please arent you embarrassed showing in public your low intelligence
now go and play in the traffic
lethal1960 2 years ago
Amanda Keller got smashed with the truth just there.
daniel987878 2 years ago
Thanks for sharing, best wishes
911veritas 2 years ago
I wish I'd taken the time to see this guy in Brisbane he rocks.
belial259 2 years ago
Keep going people, they cannot hide for ever, the truth WILL come out, and those responsible WILL be held accountable.
New World Order can all rot in hell.
delonixradar 2 years ago
About time the mainstream are starting to ask questions & give "Truthers" a go after having swallowed the official line for so many years like nicely well trained puppets
DMRH69 2 years ago
Thanks for your work and this post!
The Pentagon has lost his creditbillity among the Europeans all time ago.
Our stupid leaders only comply tho their will because 'Amerika' went to war against Germany in WW II.
Most people do not know 2 large banks in America sponserd Hitler in his warfare funding.
We all know the White House is filled with stupid old man, fighting stupid old battles. The american people knows, and the rest of the world knows.
Watch the Age of Stupid please!
SpAcYmEn 2 years ago
Thank you !
TheGoodnessIsGood 2 years ago
It is good to see 9/11 finally getting some exposure on MS. People who study the issue seriously will find that the official myth cannot be true.
zwarst 2 years ago
kissinger oversaw our new oversized parliament who is in on the 911 & all they all make money from medicines bought & the vaccines they put the live viruses in to get u sick in first place,. thank God Australia Waking up ,. Use the Constitution tht was stripd frm our schools in 75 roughly same time whitlam got sacked for treason & birng justice to ilegal statues & help return australia to way it was b4 globilisation. dont let thm diminish world pop to 500mill.
Educate & Love! Thanx for vid' <3
StoneOz 2 years ago
★★★★★
AIexKidd 2 years ago