so the big question is do the trees in the forest exist if I'm not there to observe them. So things didn't exist at all until I came about to validate their existence. Sounds like philosophical gymnastics. Well of course they did. So prior to telescopes being invented the universe beyond the eye didn't exist.... amazing. What power we have as humans.
This is not the Anthropic Principle. The Anthropic Principle is "the universe is the way it is because if it wasn't we wouldn't be here to ask". This is the "If a tree falls in the woods..." problem, whether something observed has an existence without the observer.
Being a geek, both in the cosmological and Anime sense, I love this video because I honestly don't know if this is a dub, or if it's part of the show.
@FiverBeyond, have you seen Evangelion? It gets sort of like that towards the end of the series, but there's always some kind of underlying speculation about human existance, how we think of ourselves, and the relationships that we form with other people.
you do realize, that in the sub, the subbers incorrectly translate it as "human Principle" rather than "Anthropic Principle" right? Not that most people would care anyways. hypnotstcollector you're correct. The Anthropic Principle has quite a lot to do with the anime actually. It pose the question that seeing as how the universe is so fine tuned, is there perhaps a reason for it being so?
Did the universe just happern on its own? Are there other types of universes and we just happen to be on one suitable for life and sentience? Is there a creator? Is there a principle in the universe that drives development of life and sentience? Are universes developing beings to acknoledge it are the only ones that exist as Itsuki explain? Or we all live in a Matrix scenario, what Itsuki was talking about a few episodes ago. But its not like anyone would waste there time thinking bout this.
the anthropioc priciple shows the STATISTICAL impossability of life unless all the structures in the making of the universe were Just So. Fluorine as an example. It takes a highly tuned UNIVERSE to have life exists anywhere. So, the anthropic pricnciple is more than stated here.
I actually understand this, although I don't think I'd be able to explain it to anyone ^^' I guess I'll try though....I wanna say its like, lets say, dogs are dogs because we say they are. we've found differences between dogs and cats and put them into different categories....and yet that isn't what I'm trying to say....
it's funny how an ANIME has made so many people actualyl think XD I love it when I do think because of an anime. its awesome
OMG i HATE the english version of haruhi suzumiya. Japanese with english dubbed is better, but when i watched this scene i learned a lot on this principle, looked it up, and made a blog about it myself on my space.
nastassja08 theres acutally a story of an astronomer who gave a lecture on the universe. At the end, an old lady came up to him and told him, your wrong the world sits on the back of a turtle. The astronomer asked what the turtle was sitting and the old lady replied its turtles all the way down.
can't we say that the universe is the way it is and THAT IS WHY humans came into existence instead of "something else" coming into existence....does that make any sense.
this has more to do with perception of the universe than the actual anthropic principle. Th anthropic principle says that with how improbable life-permitting universes are there must be a God. the criticism of this is the human-centered view of what is life permitting and they idea that given an infinite amount of time the most improbable but not impossible things not only do happen, but they must happen. Therefore whatever the improbability of life is, it is irrelevant.
It reminds me of fuyutski and gendo discussing the city during their ride in the train. also we dont know about the existance of things untill we discover them, like anti matter..... and many many more things. discovery is inherit, we live and study things from planet earth, imagine a planet of extreems like say jupiters atmosphere or venus, there is MUCH to discover its not so much that its not there its just we havent found it.
nice, pretentious but it bring up a point. well this theory in general is something i have speculated about long before its existance, man is self aware therefore he and things exist... at least thats what he believes. A tree still makes a sound even though nobody is there to hear it, wether its heard or not the cause and effect are still in existance despite human prescence or knowledge, its a bit like I think therefore I am.
What it means is that many theists believe that the laws and constants of the universe are so finely tuned to allow human beings to exist, that it's proof of a God. What this video does is tell it through the eyes of another form of life, which illustrates how foolish this belief would be if indeed other forms of life existed outside of the kinds we find on this planet.
Actually, Theo hit the nail a bit better. I'd can say that similar extra-terresterial life-forms would consider life to be the proof of God due to the fact that it takes fine-tuning to produce any form of life, even their own.
Also, Itsuki was mentioning the anthropic principle to describe Haruhi Suzumiya's case, because what she actually thinks is what materializes in the Universe.
Just a note for any philosophers and theologians seeing this video..... just because Itsuki talks about this principle doesn't mean Haruhi Suzumiya advocates this idea or is purely about it. It's... far more complicated.
correction...people who think they ear philosophers because in the entire human history only 23 philosophers have lived...teaching philosophy and being a philosopher are an entirely different thing...philosophers know EVERYTHING they must know to do what they do.
I think what he means is that what we perceive as reality is what we only see through our own means and five senses. If sentient beings like humans never had evolved and had the capacity to question the universe or try to understand it, the "universe" as we perceive it now would never "exist" in the first place.
if you change all the four forces at once you can still create a universe with a chance for life.
Requiemxtoxinnocence 2 weeks ago
"No, I'm just kidding."
ಠ___ಠ
Kari166 3 weeks ago
what's the music called in the background?
LozerClub 1 month ago
Is that lelouch's voice? wtf?
luke96j 3 months ago
In video games like San Andres this is totally true...
IgnisLupi 3 months ago
This is so helpful :)
FrankiiHep 10 months ago
This is amazingly well put
Lanfear27 11 months ago
so the big question is do the trees in the forest exist if I'm not there to observe them. So things didn't exist at all until I came about to validate their existence. Sounds like philosophical gymnastics. Well of course they did. So prior to telescopes being invented the universe beyond the eye didn't exist.... amazing. What power we have as humans.
andytroyer 11 months ago
This is not the Anthropic Principle. The Anthropic Principle is "the universe is the way it is because if it wasn't we wouldn't be here to ask". This is the "If a tree falls in the woods..." problem, whether something observed has an existence without the observer.
whade62000 1 year ago
who was the genius that put that guy to bud Kyon?
PoxHaunted 1 year ago
Ichigo? Lelouch? sounds like him alright.
FIRETHEMOO 1 year ago
@FIRETHEMOO, yup.
Kari166 3 weeks ago
I don't really know why there's creepy music in the background, but I kinda like it.
kickthecommie 1 year ago
Being a geek, both in the cosmological and Anime sense, I love this video because I honestly don't know if this is a dub, or if it's part of the show.
FiverBeyond 1 year ago
@FiverBeyond its the dub
KlDBUU 1 year ago
Sad... I was looking forward to finding an anime that discussed existentialistic, humanist philosophy...
FiverBeyond 1 year ago
maybe i was unclear, this is part of the show, I said dub as reference to the dubbed form of the show.
That being said, while it does discus human philosophy, I don't think this is what you are looking for
KlDBUU 1 year ago
Ah, sorry, my bad. Right, I understand your point... I just thought it was funny was all.
FiverBeyond 1 year ago
@FiverBeyond, have you seen Evangelion? It gets sort of like that towards the end of the series, but there's always some kind of underlying speculation about human existance, how we think of ourselves, and the relationships that we form with other people.
...AND THEN THERE'S THE MOVIE(S). o____O
Kari166 3 weeks ago
lulz
danny312515 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I used to believe in this stuff
TheReasonWhyGuy 2 years ago
beleive in what stuff? in anime? XD lol
Inmylifealive 2 years ago
Comment removed
Inmylifealive 2 years ago
you do realize, that in the sub, the subbers incorrectly translate it as "human Principle" rather than "Anthropic Principle" right? Not that most people would care anyways. hypnotstcollector you're correct. The Anthropic Principle has quite a lot to do with the anime actually. It pose the question that seeing as how the universe is so fine tuned, is there perhaps a reason for it being so?
Xemnashizzo 2 years ago
Did the universe just happern on its own? Are there other types of universes and we just happen to be on one suitable for life and sentience? Is there a creator? Is there a principle in the universe that drives development of life and sentience? Are universes developing beings to acknoledge it are the only ones that exist as Itsuki explain? Or we all live in a Matrix scenario, what Itsuki was talking about a few episodes ago. But its not like anyone would waste there time thinking bout this.
Xemnashizzo 2 years ago
makes perfect sense
shadowsofassault 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
english dub for the lose :(
1ApertureRealist 2 years ago
@1ApertureRealist, NOPE.
Kari166 3 weeks ago
the anthropioc priciple shows the STATISTICAL impossability of life unless all the structures in the making of the universe were Just So. Fluorine as an example. It takes a highly tuned UNIVERSE to have life exists anywhere. So, the anthropic pricnciple is more than stated here.
hypnotstcollector 3 years ago
I actually understand this, although I don't think I'd be able to explain it to anyone ^^' I guess I'll try though....I wanna say its like, lets say, dogs are dogs because we say they are. we've found differences between dogs and cats and put them into different categories....and yet that isn't what I'm trying to say....
it's funny how an ANIME has made so many people actualyl think XD I love it when I do think because of an anime. its awesome
AnimeAndMusicLover 3 years ago
oops meant to say japanese with english subtitles.
TheDarkSaint1 3 years ago
OMG i HATE the english version of haruhi suzumiya. Japanese with english dubbed is better, but when i watched this scene i learned a lot on this principle, looked it up, and made a blog about it myself on my space.
TheDarkSaint1 3 years ago
there is a DESIGNER. however, this designer couldn't exist without his design existing. therefore the design is the DESIGNER him/her/itself.
did i just write that? wtf! hahahahaha
nastassja08 3 years ago
nastassja08 theres acutally a story of an astronomer who gave a lecture on the universe. At the end, an old lady came up to him and told him, your wrong the world sits on the back of a turtle. The astronomer asked what the turtle was sitting and the old lady replied its turtles all the way down.
Xemnashizzo 2 years ago
can't we say that the universe is the way it is and THAT IS WHY humans came into existence instead of "something else" coming into existence....does that make any sense.
AIMANALI 3 years ago
I oddly understood everyword of it. And even went Ahhh at some points,. I'mma throw that at one of my homeboyz.
AfterImageEnt 3 years ago
Same for me
AnimeAndMusicLover 3 years ago
It's easier to undstand subtitled rather than dubbed for me. Strange... Great clip.
Roy7437 3 years ago
this has more to do with perception of the universe than the actual anthropic principle. Th anthropic principle says that with how improbable life-permitting universes are there must be a God. the criticism of this is the human-centered view of what is life permitting and they idea that given an infinite amount of time the most improbable but not impossible things not only do happen, but they must happen. Therefore whatever the improbability of life is, it is irrelevant.
Unclesamslair 3 years ago
It reminds me of fuyutski and gendo discussing the city during their ride in the train. also we dont know about the existance of things untill we discover them, like anti matter..... and many many more things. discovery is inherit, we live and study things from planet earth, imagine a planet of extreems like say jupiters atmosphere or venus, there is MUCH to discover its not so much that its not there its just we havent found it.
metalraider187 4 years ago
nice, pretentious but it bring up a point. well this theory in general is something i have speculated about long before its existance, man is self aware therefore he and things exist... at least thats what he believes. A tree still makes a sound even though nobody is there to hear it, wether its heard or not the cause and effect are still in existance despite human prescence or knowledge, its a bit like I think therefore I am.
metalraider187 4 years ago
What it means is that many theists believe that the laws and constants of the universe are so finely tuned to allow human beings to exist, that it's proof of a God. What this video does is tell it through the eyes of another form of life, which illustrates how foolish this belief would be if indeed other forms of life existed outside of the kinds we find on this planet.
jetmanisme 4 years ago
Actually, Theo hit the nail a bit better. I'd can say that similar extra-terresterial life-forms would consider life to be the proof of God due to the fact that it takes fine-tuning to produce any form of life, even their own.
Also, Itsuki was mentioning the anthropic principle to describe Haruhi Suzumiya's case, because what she actually thinks is what materializes in the Universe.
charliec81 4 years ago
Just a note for any philosophers and theologians seeing this video..... just because Itsuki talks about this principle doesn't mean Haruhi Suzumiya advocates this idea or is purely about it. It's... far more complicated.
charliec81 4 years ago
correction...people who think they ear philosophers because in the entire human history only 23 philosophers have lived...teaching philosophy and being a philosopher are an entirely different thing...philosophers know EVERYTHING they must know to do what they do.
DesertFoX91 3 years ago
I think what he means is that what we perceive as reality is what we only see through our own means and five senses. If sentient beings like humans never had evolved and had the capacity to question the universe or try to understand it, the "universe" as we perceive it now would never "exist" in the first place.
Theo9874456 4 years ago 2
That kinda reminds me about Descartes... y'know.
charliec81 4 years ago
well, if that's what he's talking about, then that's epistemology not the anthropic principle.
Unclesamslair 3 years ago
does anyone get what he was saying? i'm still clueless on what he means. and thanks for the upload
mistyXninja 4 years ago