Thanks to liberal policies America can no longer afford to pay for medicare, social security, unemployment and many other services. We also need to lower the minimum wage to $2/hr in order to compete with China and bring jobs back home. Fiscally responsible conservatives like Paul Ryan and John Boehner know this and are currently
working to end these wasteful handout programs and bring the minimum wage down so that America can be great again. God bless the GOP!
@TheAmericanArm Actually it is the opposite if you actually look at modern European Countries. They have Socialist Capitalist hybrid much like everyone (even the US), and they found the correct balance. They regulate their market and have public services. Tax are higher, but wages are even higher.
Actually saying communist and socialists are similar just prove how ignorant you are. Also Corporations don't exist in communist governments. Open a book.
@bubumarms What are you talking about people earned every hour of service, every dollar of their pension, don't be ridiculous. Besides the wealthy get all their money from other people.
@grizzzlyjoe Yah...and of course, we know what a STRAIN paying for their own healthcare would be on their personal finances...most of 'em are only single and double-digit MILLIONAIRES, right?
@grizzzlyjoe Hmmm...well, of course, we know what a STRAIN buying their OWN health coverage might put on their EARNINGS...I mean, most of them are only single and double-digit millionaires, right...?
What do I think? You asked for it! Here's how to reduce the deficit, fire every member of Congress and replace them with individuals that will do the job for less pay! Sound familiar? It would be cheaper for this country to pay all these crooks unemployment for 99 weeks and then tell them there is no more and put them all on TANF, Medicaid and Food Stamps just like they have done to so many Americans! What comes around, goes around!
@rickbar123 The Repuglies voted 5 times AGAINST closing the tax loophole that encourages companies to relocate over seas...they have never done a damn thing to bring American jobs back.
@momzacarp Both parties like outsourcing jobs. It gives the dems more welfare recipients to use as a political weapon, and it gives the repubs good campaign fodder. ;) I don't see either party damaged by destroying the economy, which is why they seek to further it's implosion.
Instead of playing politics, why not vote for the Progressive Caucus' Budget? It's the most fiscally responsible, and less of a right wing handout than Obama's suggestion.
@mexcurmudgeon Because the Progressive Budget ends the wars. The wars cannot be ended, there's too much oil in Iraq/Afghanistan. Obama cannot make his corporate overlords unhappy or they won't fund his campaign in 2012.
He does not like government transparency, based on his voting record, despite what he claims.
He is a useful tool for the those who control our government, as his progressive system is similar to what central banking and authoritarian governments prefer. He is consistent and appears to be free of corruption, but his belief that rights are granted by the State is not what I signed up for.
"No person, who has been a member of Congress, or who is presently serving in Congress, shall be allowed to have any other form of Medical Insurance other than Medicare after they reach the age of 65."
These bastards have a retirement program that NO RATIONAL PERSON WOULD BELIEVE or APPROVE OF.
AS it stands, we are legally forced into using a money that a private group of unaccountable, unelected wall street bankers can manipulate to serve their wall street friends at the expense of ALL AMERICANS and AMERICA ITSELF. They can devalue our dollar so that nobody can get ahead, nobody can save for their children. Prices go up, but wages stay the same. Why? What is inflation? The printing presses from the FED who has no incentive to stop. . . just to keep printing people into poverty.
If you change our monetary policy, it'll encourage domestic business and allow average people to gain savings, which will level the corporate playing field. It's all a puppet show unless we really tackle the meat and potatoes. The Fed has got to go. Fractional Reserve banking/central banking has got to go. We need market money that we aren't forced into using, so they can't inflate our futures into oblivion. That's why prices are rising and people are so poor they have to be on welfare. THE FED!
@onepiecefan74 Not really. I've watched his laws pretty closely and he doesn't tend to propose budget bills. His bills are generally more philosophical and broader. He's typically after cutting whole institutions or changing the entire monetary policy, not just keeping the status quo and playing with the numbers a bit to gain votes. Dr. Paul is a very esteemed economist. He actually does know what he's talking about. You just have to educate yourself to fully see why his approach is correct.
@onepiecefan74 Not really. I've watched his laws pretty closely and he doesn't tend to propose budget bills. His bills are generally more philosophical and broader. He's typically after cutting whole institutions or changing the entire monetary policy, not just keeping the status quo and playing with the numbers a bit to gain votes. Dr. Paul is a very esteemed economist. He actually does know what he's talking about. You just have to educate yourself to fully see why his approach is correct.
The Ryan budget hardly makes any cuts. Rand Paul's budget does. Has Sanders not seen Paul's Budget or is he being over dramatic again? I vote for overdramatic!
@MrGreeneggsnham It's all spun and nonissue. Rand, like his father, are not about to throw old ladies out on the street. If you read Ron Paul's presidential plan, he actually increases social spending for a period of time while cutting the military industrial complex/corporate welfare, and then his monetary policy helps to lift people from the need for gov assistance, thus naturally reducing spending on social programs. Gee whiz. Everyone's happy (except for the corrupt). Who woulda thunk it.
A few names I would vote for: Ron Paul, Anthony Weiner, Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich, or Gary Johnson. Be sure to get a good mix of progressives and libertarians.
@Zlibservacratican Ron Paul and Gary Johnson are constitutionalists, not libtards. the others are communist traitors who will destroy this country. Weiner is a pervert. Kucinich is a flake. Sanders is the worse.
where is the term "blueprint" in the constitution? isnt it instead called a "bill?" i guess repug politicians dont read the constitution.
how come the common folk have to make due w/ repug's ideas of "vouchers for schools & healthcare & whatever else?
if vouchers are that great, then we should have tax refund vouchers for the wealthy & big corp.s. after they pay their taxes, we'll give them 'refund vouchers' if it's approved of by the rest of us via a national ballot.
So Bernie, let's be on the up n up. Propose taxing every man woman and child enough to balence the budget.....that's right , you and the democraps and republican'ts are liers and theives...stealing from the poor, the fixed income, the savers...e veryone, as you finance your deficit spending by innflating away our dollar. Go to hell dickwad.
"Congress shall pass NO LAW that applies to The People, but does not apply equally to the members of Congress. Congress shall take NO SERVICES that applies to them, yet does not apply equally to The People."
@grizzzlyjoe But that's the constitution. Congress and the oval office don't like the pesky constitution. It restrains them from being caesars. No fun for them. Have a heart. ;)
@grizzzlyjoe If they did that, I might reconsider my opposition to the PATRIOT ACT on a temporary basis. . . just long enough to haul all these terrorists into court to be tried for their violence unleashed upon Americans and the rest of the world.
Republicans and dems won't cut the military budget and the extra supplement spending it receives. But Repubs are okay cutting the budget for what affects the little guy.
@LiberalJerseyman Meh. Bernie Sanders lost a lot of clout with me when he sold out on an audit of the Fed. He was really looking like he was going to do something, but he caved big time, while the guy he was working closely with, Ron Paul, didn't. It's sad, because even the guys from the liberal side that I like from time to time tend to sell out. Dennis Kucinich rallied against Obamacare as a bailout to insurance companies (even though he's a big social care advocate), then voted yes.
@LiberalJerseyman Ron Paul stuck to his guns and he's getting even more steam for an audit now. When Audit the Fed was being proposed, Dr. Paul was still somewhat obscure. Now he's on almost every network all the time as the voice of reason. He's going to run in 2012, and he wins every single straw poll. That's what not selling out did. Bernie Sanders could have gotten a piece of that as well as kucinich. They'll get SOME for their roles, but not as much because they backed down from pressure.
@terramortim Sorry, but Ron Paul is seriously taking the whole "Fed" thing too far. Fact is, the Fed needs to exist. A full Congressional takeover of it would be disastrous.
@LiberalJerseyman Now imagine that: The possibility of The President himself giving a freedom message about sensible money and civil liberties who is actually willing to follow through. Imagine the example that will set. How is this possible? He didn't sell out for second best. even if he doesn't win, he still propells the message higher and higher until the entire nation beats to the same drum. . . against the banksters. ;) The long term war vs the short term battle. I pick the long term to win
@terramortim I wouldn't trust an anarcho-capitalist whacko like Ron Paul to be President. Capitalism doesn't give civil liberties to anyone but the rich assholes.
@LiberalJerseyman Can you provide an example of this? I've never seen a fully capitalist system do exactly that. For clarification we are not under a capitalist system, and neither were we in the Robber Baron days. in both cases, government interferes in the market to prop up only the rich who can afford to buy off non-producing politicians, rather than providing goods or services that people desire, regardless of capital like a free market system would do.
@terramortim Anti-trust laws? Hello? Anarcho-capitalism is an impossible lie. If you take away the Federal Government, corporations will form their own government. There are companies like Blackwater that could just kill every CEO in the country and claim the company for itself. It would truly be disastrous.
@LiberalJerseyman To add a further bit of food for thought before you reply: All of the popular villians of anti-capitalists only made money when given privilege by government (fascism, not capitalism). Often, they crushed the free market competition via government granted monopoly privilege on the taxpayer dime, such as with the railroads which literally CREATED big oil.
@LiberalJerseyman I agree at who the enemy is, but the elephant in the room is who enables them, rather than tames them. The government is what creates huge monopolies, because the monopolists are the literal regulators. They regulate their competition out of business and then lobby for more taxes to be given to businesses who don't outsource (like they do), and more regulations to be selectively enforced against those who don't pay enough bribes. That's fascism, not capitalism.
Go Bernie Sanders!
padude64 6 months ago
I would back Bernie for president. He surely would be at least as good as the current contenders.
albertuscurtius 6 months ago 2
Bernie Sanders should move to Cuba.
bubumarms 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks to liberal policies America can no longer afford to pay for medicare, social security, unemployment and many other services. We also need to lower the minimum wage to $2/hr in order to compete with China and bring jobs back home. Fiscally responsible conservatives like Paul Ryan and John Boehner know this and are currently
working to end these wasteful handout programs and bring the minimum wage down so that America can be great again. God bless the GOP!
GOPkicksbutt 9 months ago
SOCIALISM WORKS
threeoneg77 10 months ago
@threeoneg77 LOL...
TheAmericanArm 10 months ago
@threeoneg77 Until the money runs out...then all that's left over total dictation and dog food.
TheAmericanArm 9 months ago
@threeoneg77 SOCIALISM: WORKS FOR FOOD----->And corporations love Chinese socialism.
You really love Corporations if you love communist/socialist style governments.
Get a Job.
TheAmericanArm 9 months ago
@TheAmericanArm Actually it is the opposite if you actually look at modern European Countries. They have Socialist Capitalist hybrid much like everyone (even the US), and they found the correct balance. They regulate their market and have public services. Tax are higher, but wages are even higher.
Actually saying communist and socialists are similar just prove how ignorant you are. Also Corporations don't exist in communist governments. Open a book.
Neosaigo 8 months ago 3
@threeoneg77 What happens when you run out of other peoples money?
bubumarms 8 months ago
@bubumarms What are you talking about people earned every hour of service, every dollar of their pension, don't be ridiculous. Besides the wealthy get all their money from other people.
Meade556 7 months ago
Bernie is a commie...Fuck that...Bernie would not make a dent in running for president.
TheAmericanArm 10 months ago
@TheAmericanArm If he was a communist he wouldn't support a government at all.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman Sorry super left socialist....not technically a commie...only because our government paradigm is not designed for that...
But if it could Bernie would support it.
TheAmericanArm 10 months ago
@TheAmericanArm You don't even know what you're talking about.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman No...you obviously don't because He himself claims openly dumbass that he is a socialist!!
Do you even research anything before you type...or just make comments for no reason?
TheAmericanArm 10 months ago
@TheAmericanArm I know he's a self proclaimed democratic socialist. Clearly, you have no idea what that means. And learn to spell.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman Yeah, your a fucking idiot...Fuck you.
TheAmericanArm 10 months ago
@TheAmericanArm Thanks again for the empty rebuttal you fucking retard.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@grizzzlyjoe Yah...and of course, we know what a STRAIN paying for their own healthcare would be on their personal finances...most of 'em are only single and double-digit MILLIONAIRES, right?
TheMercilessEye 10 months ago
@grizzzlyjoe Hmmm...well, of course, we know what a STRAIN buying their OWN health coverage might put on their EARNINGS...I mean, most of them are only single and double-digit millionaires, right...?
TheMercilessEye 10 months ago
@rickbar123 Prepare for some seriously high prices then.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
What do I think? You asked for it! Here's how to reduce the deficit, fire every member of Congress and replace them with individuals that will do the job for less pay! Sound familiar? It would be cheaper for this country to pay all these crooks unemployment for 99 weeks and then tell them there is no more and put them all on TANF, Medicaid and Food Stamps just like they have done to so many Americans! What comes around, goes around!
TheeBudGuru 10 months ago
END NAFTA
END FREE TRADE
PROTECT MANUFACTURING HERE
CLOSE ALL LOOP HOLES
CLOSE ALL OFFSHORE HEADQUARTERS
CLOSE ALL OFFSHORE BANK ACCOUNTS
PASS A NEW WAGNER ACT
TAX THE RICH AND THE CORPORATION
MAKE IT HERE OR DON'T SELL IT HERE
ANYTHING LESS IS A WALL STREET, REPUB WET DREAM
rickbar123 10 months ago
@rickbar123 Prepare for some seriously high prices if that happens. Protectionism ruins economies.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@rickbar123 The Repuglies voted 5 times AGAINST closing the tax loophole that encourages companies to relocate over seas...they have never done a damn thing to bring American jobs back.
momzacarp 10 months ago
@momzacarp yep, never will
rickbar123 10 months ago
@momzacarp Both parties like outsourcing jobs. It gives the dems more welfare recipients to use as a political weapon, and it gives the repubs good campaign fodder. ;) I don't see either party damaged by destroying the economy, which is why they seek to further it's implosion.
terramortim 10 months ago
Instead of playing politics, why not vote for the Progressive Caucus' Budget? It's the most fiscally responsible, and less of a right wing handout than Obama's suggestion.
mexcurmudgeon 10 months ago 2
@mexcurmudgeon Because the Progressive Budget ends the wars. The wars cannot be ended, there's too much oil in Iraq/Afghanistan. Obama cannot make his corporate overlords unhappy or they won't fund his campaign in 2012.
PullyElbow27 10 months ago
@TheElMoIsEviL
He does not like government transparency, based on his voting record, despite what he claims.
He is a useful tool for the those who control our government, as his progressive system is similar to what central banking and authoritarian governments prefer. He is consistent and appears to be free of corruption, but his belief that rights are granted by the State is not what I signed up for.
He is a good man, but a better politician.
jag10 10 months ago
You want to save Medicare? Pass this Law:
"No person, who has been a member of Congress, or who is presently serving in Congress, shall be allowed to have any other form of Medical Insurance other than Medicare after they reach the age of 65."
These bastards have a retirement program that NO RATIONAL PERSON WOULD BELIEVE or APPROVE OF.
Do the research ... it's CRAZY!!!
grizzzlyjoe 10 months ago 4
AS it stands, we are legally forced into using a money that a private group of unaccountable, unelected wall street bankers can manipulate to serve their wall street friends at the expense of ALL AMERICANS and AMERICA ITSELF. They can devalue our dollar so that nobody can get ahead, nobody can save for their children. Prices go up, but wages stay the same. Why? What is inflation? The printing presses from the FED who has no incentive to stop. . . just to keep printing people into poverty.
terramortim 10 months ago
If you change our monetary policy, it'll encourage domestic business and allow average people to gain savings, which will level the corporate playing field. It's all a puppet show unless we really tackle the meat and potatoes. The Fed has got to go. Fractional Reserve banking/central banking has got to go. We need market money that we aren't forced into using, so they can't inflate our futures into oblivion. That's why prices are rising and people are so poor they have to be on welfare. THE FED!
terramortim 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@gunloc26 Burn, mainstream media, burn. :D I've got some weenies and smores waiting. Anyone care to join me?
terramortim 10 months ago
@gunloc26 Burn, mainstream media, burn. :D I've got some weenies and smores waiting. Anyone care to join me?
terramortim 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@onepiecefan74 Not really. I've watched his laws pretty closely and he doesn't tend to propose budget bills. His bills are generally more philosophical and broader. He's typically after cutting whole institutions or changing the entire monetary policy, not just keeping the status quo and playing with the numbers a bit to gain votes. Dr. Paul is a very esteemed economist. He actually does know what he's talking about. You just have to educate yourself to fully see why his approach is correct.
terramortim 10 months ago
@onepiecefan74 Not really. I've watched his laws pretty closely and he doesn't tend to propose budget bills. His bills are generally more philosophical and broader. He's typically after cutting whole institutions or changing the entire monetary policy, not just keeping the status quo and playing with the numbers a bit to gain votes. Dr. Paul is a very esteemed economist. He actually does know what he's talking about. You just have to educate yourself to fully see why his approach is correct.
terramortim 10 months ago
4:54 to 5:04...PRICELESS!!! I wonder if the voices in his head were talking to Crazy Ed again? LOL!
gunloc26 10 months ago
ed and sanders for president...
smekese 10 months ago
@smekese ROFLMAO!!! That was a good one!
gunloc26 10 months ago
The Ryan budget hardly makes any cuts. Rand Paul's budget does. Has Sanders not seen Paul's Budget or is he being over dramatic again? I vote for overdramatic!
MrGreeneggsnham 10 months ago
@MrGreeneggsnham It's all spun and nonissue. Rand, like his father, are not about to throw old ladies out on the street. If you read Ron Paul's presidential plan, he actually increases social spending for a period of time while cutting the military industrial complex/corporate welfare, and then his monetary policy helps to lift people from the need for gov assistance, thus naturally reducing spending on social programs. Gee whiz. Everyone's happy (except for the corrupt). Who woulda thunk it.
terramortim 10 months ago
A few names I would vote for: Ron Paul, Anthony Weiner, Bernie Sanders, Dennis Kucinich, or Gary Johnson. Be sure to get a good mix of progressives and libertarians.
Zlibservacratican 10 months ago
@Zlibservacratican Ron Paul and Gary Johnson are constitutionalists, not libtards. the others are communist traitors who will destroy this country. Weiner is a pervert. Kucinich is a flake. Sanders is the worse.
bubumarms 8 months ago
where is the term "blueprint" in the constitution? isnt it instead called a "bill?" i guess repug politicians dont read the constitution.
how come the common folk have to make due w/ repug's ideas of "vouchers for schools & healthcare & whatever else?
if vouchers are that great, then we should have tax refund vouchers for the wealthy & big corp.s. after they pay their taxes, we'll give them 'refund vouchers' if it's approved of by the rest of us via a national ballot.
rumpole33 10 months ago 2
So Bernie, let's be on the up n up. Propose taxing every man woman and child enough to balence the budget.....that's right , you and the democraps and republican'ts are liers and theives...stealing from the poor, the fixed income, the savers...e veryone, as you finance your deficit spending by innflating away our dollar. Go to hell dickwad.
philais 10 months ago
oh snap ED is taking on CNNs approach of a big screen.... ED you need like 100inch touch screen! .... come on lets do it GO GO GO!
lSeKToRl 10 months ago
It's not just right-wing... it's a POS.
donnyforte2 10 months ago
Ed Schultz is a tool.
joepglass 10 months ago
One more addition to that 28th. Amendment:
"... and only by a vote of the People can the Congressional Salaries and/or Benefits be increased."
grizzzlyjoe 10 months ago
Sanders also thinks that transparency in government and backyard gardens are extremely right wing.
jag10 10 months ago
It's time for the 28th. Amendment:
"Congress shall pass NO LAW that applies to The People, but does not apply equally to the members of Congress. Congress shall take NO SERVICES that applies to them, yet does not apply equally to The People."
PERIOD!!!
grizzzlyjoe 10 months ago 33
@grizzzlyjoe But that's the constitution. Congress and the oval office don't like the pesky constitution. It restrains them from being caesars. No fun for them. Have a heart. ;)
terramortim 10 months ago
@grizzzlyjoe Seconded, with the added proviso that it also include CORPORATIONS.
TheMercilessEye 10 months ago
@grizzzlyjoe If they did that, I might reconsider my opposition to the PATRIOT ACT on a temporary basis. . . just long enough to haul all these terrorists into court to be tried for their violence unleashed upon Americans and the rest of the world.
terramortim 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is just proof that they don't read the legislation their handlers give them.
>:P
iTellYouNoLie 10 months ago
Republicans and dems won't cut the military budget and the extra supplement spending it receives. But Repubs are okay cutting the budget for what affects the little guy.
military budget=military-industrial complex.
VexZeez 10 months ago
Bernie Sanders should run for president.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago 37
@LiberalJerseyman I'd vote for him...
ykw68 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman Bernie sanders have real solutions and not radical BS like ron paul...
lSeKToRl 10 months ago
@lSeKToRl Finally! Someone on MoxNews who isn't a Ron Paul zombie....
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago 3
@LiberalJerseyman
Ron Paul zombie? I'd say your user name says it all in what kind of zombie you are...
rmccay88 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman I agree, Bernie Sanders would be my option of choice if I could pick from any person currently working for the government.
MadXMax187 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman Meh. Bernie Sanders lost a lot of clout with me when he sold out on an audit of the Fed. He was really looking like he was going to do something, but he caved big time, while the guy he was working closely with, Ron Paul, didn't. It's sad, because even the guys from the liberal side that I like from time to time tend to sell out. Dennis Kucinich rallied against Obamacare as a bailout to insurance companies (even though he's a big social care advocate), then voted yes.
terramortim 10 months ago 2
@terramortim It was either that or no audit at all. He fought for what he wanted, and settled with what he got. Same story with Kucinich.
Unfortunately, that's the way it works in Washington DC.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman Ron Paul stuck to his guns and he's getting even more steam for an audit now. When Audit the Fed was being proposed, Dr. Paul was still somewhat obscure. Now he's on almost every network all the time as the voice of reason. He's going to run in 2012, and he wins every single straw poll. That's what not selling out did. Bernie Sanders could have gotten a piece of that as well as kucinich. They'll get SOME for their roles, but not as much because they backed down from pressure.
terramortim 10 months ago
@terramortim Sorry, but Ron Paul is seriously taking the whole "Fed" thing too far. Fact is, the Fed needs to exist. A full Congressional takeover of it would be disastrous.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman Now imagine that: The possibility of The President himself giving a freedom message about sensible money and civil liberties who is actually willing to follow through. Imagine the example that will set. How is this possible? He didn't sell out for second best. even if he doesn't win, he still propells the message higher and higher until the entire nation beats to the same drum. . . against the banksters. ;) The long term war vs the short term battle. I pick the long term to win
terramortim 10 months ago
@terramortim I wouldn't trust an anarcho-capitalist whacko like Ron Paul to be President. Capitalism doesn't give civil liberties to anyone but the rich assholes.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman Can you provide an example of this? I've never seen a fully capitalist system do exactly that. For clarification we are not under a capitalist system, and neither were we in the Robber Baron days. in both cases, government interferes in the market to prop up only the rich who can afford to buy off non-producing politicians, rather than providing goods or services that people desire, regardless of capital like a free market system would do.
terramortim 10 months ago
@terramortim Anti-trust laws? Hello? Anarcho-capitalism is an impossible lie. If you take away the Federal Government, corporations will form their own government. There are companies like Blackwater that could just kill every CEO in the country and claim the company for itself. It would truly be disastrous.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman To add a further bit of food for thought before you reply: All of the popular villians of anti-capitalists only made money when given privilege by government (fascism, not capitalism). Often, they crushed the free market competition via government granted monopoly privilege on the taxpayer dime, such as with the railroads which literally CREATED big oil.
terramortim 10 months ago
@terramortim As I said before, government has the power to also do exactly the opposite. Anti-trust laws.
LiberalJerseyman 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman I agree at who the enemy is, but the elephant in the room is who enables them, rather than tames them. The government is what creates huge monopolies, because the monopolists are the literal regulators. They regulate their competition out of business and then lobby for more taxes to be given to businesses who don't outsource (like they do), and more regulations to be selectively enforced against those who don't pay enough bribes. That's fascism, not capitalism.
terramortim 10 months ago
@LiberalJerseyman 2 headed one party system, wake up america vote 3rd party.
olala668 9 months ago
>:P
iTellYouNoLie 10 months ago
this is just proof that they don't read the legislation their handlers give them.
>:P
iTellYouNoLie 10 months ago