Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances, we guard you while you sleep. Do NOT fuck with us.
danbowski: Here is the list of the Troll Kingdom which has declared War on Dr. Ron Paul. Their Names:..... 1. RonPaulHatesBlacks-King Troll 2. balddove-Queen Troll 3. Vote3rdParty-Prince Troll 4. arrdvarks- Jester Troll 5. atripa645-Peasant Troll 6. peoplesylum-Peasant Troll 7.starcatcher7777-Peasant Troll 8 .pgt1027-Exiled Troll The Troll Kingdom is fighting fiercely for survival! Somebody spammed it!;)
I think most of the individuals on your list of trolls that have declared war on Ron Paul are actually all the SAME person who has multiple accounts. I think, though he pretends to be a well intentioned liberal, that he's really a meanie neocon who's scared to death that the open minded, principled librarians are about to take control of the GOP away from the neocons and he's SCARED shitless.
Deep down he needs to see that NO ONE falls for his B.S. We ALL have him read like a book.
The NRA is giving FREE 1-yr memberships to everyone who wants to Join. They are trying to build up their membership to fight pending Legislation that impacts our right to keep and bear arms. It is very important that anti-gun congressmen see how many people they will have to fight to get their legislation through. We renamed the url. Just add tk to it.
Mitt Romney is a blow dried, stand for NOTHING, flip flopping, dilettante, neocon opportunist is quest for nothing but POWER. He believes he's in a class above normal people and that his money, privilege, and "body" will buy him that power. NEVER over my dead "body"! We should want NOTHING to do with him, not even so much as his "body". I DESPISE everything about him.
If you had said "Arnold Schwarzenegger's body" most of us would have said "hey, GREAT", but Mitt Romney, NEVER.
Everything I know of Ron Paul he is a great man. I respect him a lot and even thought i didnt fit in with the "grassroots" movement revolution thing I went out and stood with them and did what I could to get him elected. I just wish he was electable in our current popularity contest electoral system.
People like Ron Paul will become more and more popular, and more and more electable when they realize that everything the blow dried politicians from the mainstream of BOTH the 2 big parties have failed. Warmonger neoconsevatism has failed. The Democrats record spending,debt, borrowing, and high taxation will fail.
In the end, when all else has failed, and they'll realize how duped they've been by all these blow dried phonies, they'll start LISTENING to someone like Ron Paul.
Here is the list of the Troll Kingdom which has declared War on Dr. Ron Paul. Their Names:..... 1. RonPaulHatesBlacks-King Troll 2. balddove-Queen Troll 3. Vote3rdParty-Prince Troll 4. arrdvarks- Jester Troll 5. atripa645-Peasant Troll 6. peoplesylum-Peasant Troll 7.starcatcher7777-Peasant Troll 8 .pgt1027-Exiled Troll The Troll Kingdom is fighting fiercely for survival!
"I repeat--Money Market Mutual Funds are NOT part of the banking system! They are mutual funds that invest in T-bills and commercial paper."
I read into it and now I understand your point, I don't understand why he included that in the measurement either. But there is a lot of evidence out there that shows how much more capital the federal reserve has "printed" in the past decade. Increased gov't spending = more printing, inflation. The fed also lowered interest rates for borrowing banks.
Federal Reserve - I'll admit I was shocked when I went to their website. For the 8 year period the blogger was talking about--M1 grew 37% which is 20% more than GDP (17%) for the same period. So, if the goal is to keep the money supply neutral--that is 20% too much. But, from Oct 08 - Jan 09, they increased M1 by 100%!! That's unprecedented.
Sick?...Commiting US TROOPS to a war that was never formally declared, which allows the politicians to POLITICIZE THE ENTIRE EVENT to improve their electability is whats SICK! Dont send MY BROTHERS to a fight with their hands tied and then pretend you are supporting our troops.
Anyone notice how the host is surprised that a 72 year old "white" guy is appealing to young people? As if a 72 year old black guy would? or even a 42 year old black guy would more? Why was there an emphasis on the 72 year old white guy?
Ron Paul is the only member of the Republican Party , morally, I can support. I voted for him in the Georgia Primary and I still support him. Obama is just continuing the Bush policies.
yes i totally agree, SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, bring them ALL home, NOW! Youre right, people ,make me sick also. Leaving soldiers to die in countries that have been fighting the same wars for 1600 years. When there never even was a declaration of war!
Ron Paul received the most campaign money from AMERICAN troops. This ia FACT. look on google if you do not believe me. The troops want to come home and end this fake war.
Republicans are the type of people who will take the ship down if they're sinking. They have no qualms about murdering their fellow citizens and public servants if they don't get their way.
CNN and Ron Paul are buying the DNC/White house propaganda. All the Democrats are trying to do is to take focus away from the budget and the mistakes the current administration is making. Same BS Clinton pulled 96'.
Ron Paul has spoken out a lot against what the Obama administration is doing and doesn't support any of these government bailouts. Get your facts straight.
moron, I didn't say he didn't speak out against the bailouts. All I said is that he was allowing the Limbaugh issue to draw his focus from the real issue. Read before you write garbage you bafoon
@jbpage78 My point was he clearly wasn't buying into any of the democratic propaganda like you stated. He is more against reckless spending than anyone. His platform isn't close to Obama at all. Practice what you preach, fuckhead.
Now now, let's use our brain here. What happens when the U.S. spends too much? That's right, the value of the dollar goes down, and the economy gets worse. What does that mean? Less economic opportunity, less stability. And these things impair the "pursuit of happiness," what I would call a liberty.
Constitutional liberties: The Patriot Act is an invasion of privacy, right to bear arms is wavering, etc.
Questions for Mindless: 1) Would you say that our freely elected representatives, profit-max mortgage companies, and free-to-be irresponsible home buyers--have made Adam Smith turn over in his grave? 2) Are you so sure that "pursuit of happiness" is in the Constitution? 3) Why do Mexican drug cartels come to our government-controlled market to shop for their assault weapons?
1. I'm not saying the home buyers are irresponsible. The government WANTED them to get their loans. Why do you think Fan Mae and Fred Mac were given reduced interest rates when borrowing?
2. I never said it was. I started talking about the Constitution in my second point.
3. They are SMUGGLED. Smuggling is illegal. This is why we need our troops to protect the border, not the overseas empire. But consider this: drugs would be far cheaper if they were legal. Illegal drugs are good business
1. It takes 2 to Tango. Private debt rocketed from 150% of GDP in the 80's to 335% of GDP by 2006. From 2004-2006, 2/3 of the mortgage-backed securities were issued by the private sector, 1/3 by Fannie & Freddie--and, none of theirs were sub-prime.
1. Private debt increase was caused by keynesian economic policies... (spending for growth).
"In the period of time since 2001, the Federal Reserve caused an increase in the supply of checkbook-money capital of more than 70 percent of the cumulative total amount it had created in the previous 88 years of its existence: almost 2 trillion dollars" (mises(.)org(.)story(.)3165)
Public debt is directly related to Keynesian economics, not private debt. I checked-out the link-- Checkbook money capital is not something the Federal Reserve measures. And I dont understand the logic of adding Money Market Mutual Fund deposits to M1 and dividing the by the bank reserves. Bank deposits are regulated by the Federal Reserve; Money Market Mutual Funds are under the oversight of an impotent SEC.
"Public debt is directly related to Keynesian economics, not private debt."
No, private debt is a calculation of total consumer credit. Keynesian economics are directly geared toward "monetary stimulation" of private industries.
"Checkbook money capital is not something the Federal Reserve measures."
Irrelevant. If you look at the bottom of the article where it says "Notes" and look at 5, "checkbook money capital" simply means the total checking deposits of the federal reserve.
"No, private debt is a calculation of total consumer credit. Keynesian economics are directly geared toward "monetary stimulation" of private industries."
If you don't know the definitions, or just want to obfusicate, it's really pointless to carry this any further.
"And I dont understand the logic of adding Money Market Mutual Fund deposits to M1 and dividing the by the bank reserves."
Because M1 exceeds the bank reserve's amount of actual money. The writer in the article explains it better than I can if you look at the rest of the paragraph where the citation is (#5).
M1 will always exceed the bank's reserves--since the reserve requirement is 10%. His charge that the Federal Reserve System has acted irresponsibly should be backed up by data about the banking system--and not by a measurement he invented that doesn't pertain. I repeat--Money Market Mutual Funds are NOT part of the banking system! They are mutual funds that invest in T-bills and commercial paper. (Do you understand what I'm saying?)
1. As for the loans, I'm talking about pre-2001, during the Clinton administration. The fact is, Cisneros purposely manipulated loaning requirements so that more people could be given loans (more sub-prime loans). As expected, these loans had a low return rate. The people were basically handed money with very little requirement on their part. It isn't the fault of the banks, it is the fault of the Clinton Adminstration and the fed for purposely "encouraging" banks to issue these loans.
The fact is, Fannie and Freddie didnt do any subprime lending, because they cant: the definition of a subprime loan is precisely a loan that doesnt meet the requirement, imposed by law, that Fannie and Freddie buy only mortgages issued to borrowers who made substantial down payments and carefully documented their income.
"The fact is, Fannie and Freddie didnt do any subprime lending, because they cant: the definition of a subprime loan is precisely a loan that doesnt meet the requirement, imposed by law"
Look, the requirements imposed by law were lowered, this way all the loans that were PREVIOUSLY sub-prime were no longer consider such. I'll leave it at that, because I already explained when and why this happened in another post.
Last shot. Your point is that GSE's lowered standards and this resulted in the credit crisis. My point is that 1) both before and after 2001 there were SUB-PRIME mortgages--but they were made by private mortgage companies. As sub-prime (higher risk), they had higher interest rates. 2) They did not conform to the GSE's underwriting standards, they were bundled, insured, rated AAA and sold to investors, retirement funds, etc. 3) The melt-down of SUB-PRIME market started the credit crisis.
8-5-08 issue of The Village Voice paraphrased: "Cuomo took actions that helped plunge Fannie and Freddie into the subprime markets without creating the means to monitor their increasingly risky investments. He turned the Federal Housing Administration mortgage program into a lender with sky-high loans and no money down, and he legalized what a federal judge has branded "kickbacks" to brokers that have fueled the sale of unsupportable loans. 3-4 million families now are facing foreclosure."
"My point is that 1) both before and after 2001 there were SUB-PRIME mortgages--but they were made by private mortgage companies."
I'm sorry but this is simply UNTRUE. Fan Mae and Fred Mac now own or guarantee about $1.4 trillion, or 40%, of all U.S. mortgages, with $168 billion in subprime mortgages.
Yes and no. I relied on Paul Krugman's op-ed as my only source and it turns out he was EGREGIOUSLY wrong. (I thought I was on safe ground with a Nobel prize winner)
But in a technical way I'm still right. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac don't "make" any mortgages--they only buy and insure them.
I relied on Paul Krugman's op-ed as my only source and it turns out he was EGREGIOUSLY wrong. (I thought I was on safe ground with a Nobel prize winner)"
The nobel prize has sort of lost its objectivity in my opinion.
The Nobel Prize has been politicized over the years and now the winners come from a certain socialist / leftist /philosophical ideaology. Krugman is a Keynesian supply sider, a philosophy that has been proven to be wrong.
3. Your answered "how", not "why". Drug gangs seek out guns in the United States because the gun-control laws are far tougher in Mexico. Mexican civilians must get approval from the military to buy guns and they cannot own large-caliber rifles or high-powered pistols, which are considered military weapons
Your answered "how", not "why". Drug gangs seek out guns in the United States because the gun-control laws are far tougher in Mexico."
I know that. But it is a cheap question in the first place because it assumes that increasing gun laws is the only way to solve the problem. Plus the drug lords are not just smuggling guns that are legal in the U.S.. There have been reports of fully automatic US-made M4 rifles and sometimes even grenade launchers. So you wouldn't be solving the problem anyway
Im sorry you dont find a comparison of gun control in this country to that of a third-world country enlightening. If we dont try to help solve the deleterious effects drug money and smuggled assault weapons are having on the Mexican government, we could end up with a Lebanon on our border.
"Im sorry you dont find a comparison of gun control in this country to that of a third-world country enlightening."
And I proposed two solutions to the problem in a previous post. #1 Legalize the drugs. #2 Use some of the troops on the border instead of overseas. We dont need our 700+ military bases around the world. There are some exceptions, but a lot of our military bases are superfluous.
#1 - I would defer to the world's oldest civilization in these matters. "Opium has a harm. Opium is a poison, undermining our good customs and morality. Its use is prohibited by law." --Chinese Empire's ban in 1810, after two wars over it with the British Empire.
#2 - This is that stupid idea that is bandied about by xenophobes. Border protection a "border patrol" (police) function. It is not a MILITARY MISSION! (it's brainless, really)
#1 - That quote was BEFORE they lost the two wars and were forced to legalize opium by imperialistic Britain (the wars were after 1810). Just to clarify.
Also the drug laws are having harmful effects on the economy and the prison system grows. Drugs flourish anyway, even with the strict laws.
#2 - By "border protection" I didn't mean barring illegal immigrants. I differ from Ron Paul in that I very much lean towards open immigration. I meant smuggling prevention. That IS a military mission.
Open immigration with a third word country only hurts America. Most of the mexicans that come here illegaly have no intention on living up to American standards, in fact a big percentage of them live in complete scwable so they can send as much money back to mexico as possible since they have no intention of staying indefinatly. In doing this they can under cut Americans that need too make a good wage in order to live a good midleclass life. Thats just the tip of the iceberg of downsides.
#1 "harmful effects" - no argument there; but they are known. What's unknown by all but the Chinese is the harmful effects of 25% of the population addicted to opium.
#2 - Why misuse our military for police work? If back in this country, they need to be training for war. If the Mexican war lords over-run the Border Patrol with their Colt M-4a's and 50 cal's and take Arizona, then call in the US Army.
#2 I would agree with you here, but because the police are obviously not doing their job, how else can you stop the smuggling? Like I said before, a significant portion of the smuggled weapons are already illegal to american citizens (fully automatics, grenades, stingers, etc)
RON PAUL 2012.... BEST MAN FOR THE JOB HANDS DOWN. IT'S BULLSHIT HE DIDN'T GET THE PRIMARY IN 08 AND ITS BULLSHIT THAT THE MEDIA IS SO NEGATIVE TOWARDS HIM...... EVER WONDER WHY???... YEA YOU PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE THE HELL UP. HOW MUCH MORE IS IT GOING TO TAKE TO OPEN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'S EYES?? I am a 23 yr old student of business and marketing and I support this man whole heartedly. DO YOUR HOMEWORK PEOPLE IT IS AT THE MOMENT STILL OUR COUNTRY.... BUT ANY MORE PROCRASTINATION AND IT WON'T BE
You need to read FREE TO CHOOSE by Milton Friedman and WEALTH OF NATIONS by Adam Smith.
You act as if Ron Paul came up with these concepts himself. They have been around for centuries. It's just that nobody in this generation had heard of them until Paul came on the national scene.
Get off your knees and stop blowing Ron Paul, you troll. As if your support of him somehow puts you outside the mainstream.
mbelma6329.... I bow to no one my friend.... I am very passionate about my life and my future, I believe in order for things to start changing for the better in this country we must first have someone to be a tool for a change.... someone to help pull back the curtain on all the conspiracy jargon.... even at the least he would try to get rid of the corruption that has been looming and ruining this country for decades... I see a glimpse of hope for politics in ron paul...I am open for suggestions
What is funny about your statement is that Ron Paul has been in poitics for over 30 years and now that the mainstream media has shined a spotlight on him, you act like he is something fresh and new.
The only thing you're telling me is that you buy whatever the media is selling you. I'm not saying he is not a revolutionary politician, but only that his followers have the most minute grasp of politics and the inner workings of Government.
If the Ron Paul supporters "have the most minute grasp of politics and the inner workings of Government," and if they are the ones that need to "Turn off the TV," then something is wrong here... I believe Ron Paul supporters in general would have a better grasp of politics and certainly a better grasp of the constitution than the average joe. And if the media is selling Ron Paul to people, it's certainly one hell of a soft sell... Or a reverse psychology sell?
1) youtube is procrastinators' heaven; 2) let's assume we are awake, eyes are open--what are we looking for? 3) isn't "wholehearted" one word, college guy?
I think the US needed Ron Paul in 2004 or earlier. 2008 might have been soon enough to turn things around, but 2012? :( We won't recognize the place by then, I'm afraid.
Republicans rejected Ron Paul, and tried for the safe bet. That is the exact reason why they were ousted, compromising their positions and not standing for core values. I didn't like either candidate. I no longer care about the safe bet. If Ron runs in 2012, I'm voting for him.
Supporters of Ron Paul: We need to get out the message of HR 1207! It is a bill Ron Paul is introducing now in the house to force the federal reserve to be audited. This is political gold if we can get people to talk about it! Who on earth would argue against it!
Why dont our president sue the oil company and the united nations too ! They put a way to price on oil to hurt all the economy of the world!! When there where a war!! If our country can sue the tobacco company for hurting us why not the oil!! We was attacked by the oil company to hurt the economy of the world!!
In what court do you think the president could sue United Nations? The U.S. can only legislate in their own country and the opinion of some price being too high does not make a great legal case in a "free market" economy. If it did I would be suing all kinds of companies left and right.
Is there anyone here who supported Ron Paul but voted for Obama in the general election? I would like to hear your voice so I can ask a few questions.
9/11 was secret job by some Jews Engineer who worked in pentagon disable the pilot mode, enabled the Auto pilot mode and control the Plane by high frequency Antenna from a secret room in pentagon.
proofs:
1. Most Jews worked Twine Tower took sick leave in 9/11.
2. Osama got in secret 359 million from Israeli secret service and 257 million USD from US Govt. in Soviet Union period.
3. 'Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11 by FBI'
Rush Limbaugh is bought and sold by the big Republican Party bosses. He is a piece of pompous trash. He doesn't give a damn about our personal liberties.
Down with Rush the fatass!
Upwards with Ron Paul, BraveHeart!
Ron Paul is our man in Washington! He is the voice of truth and honesty. Ron Paul for President in 2012!
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ron paul is this bitter pathetic old man who just can't accept his destiny bravely and honourably that he'll never be the US president. sorry old man.
hey asshole, it isnt his destiny or goal to be president....he is quite happy with promoting the message of liberty and influencing millions of people to think the same....
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
How did you get that I like Obama? I love Paul, but he is 73 for god's sake. Thats old as dirt. Thats older than Jon McCain! He would be in office for a year and then die of old age. A 77+ year old president is not a good thing.
Well, he is attracting plenty of youngblood. There are tons of under 40 people who are with Dr. Paul. Even if we don't get Ron Paul to run again, and even if he is too old as some say, he is bringing in a lot of youger people who are on the same track as him.
Paul remains loyal to a Republican party that has been hijacked. Kucinich remains loyal to a Democrat party, by looking at Obama's foreign policy, economic policy, his cabinet, and their House Speaker, also appears to have been hijacked.
Efforts to salvage either party should be abandoned, imo. It's time for the few honest, progressive politicians to unite, despite their differences, under one banner and take on the war hawks that have a stranglehold on the other two (?) parties.
What a total insult to Ron Paul. can you believe how snake low these wicked corporate owners are going against your liberty. Limbaugh is a bought & paid for ass tool for the military industrial complex. Rush Limbaugh against Ron Paul???
I used to like to hear Rush, back during the Cold War Days when he was right, and funny.
Today he's obviously gone off the deep end. Today he's obviously just a high paid NeoCon propagandist. Too bad he's not funny anymore. These days he just comes off as pompous arrogant ignorant, who is full of himself. He embodies the: "The blind leading the blind towards a cliff"
Ron Paul is right at usual, it's the Idiot Faux-Conservatives like Rush Limbaugh and all the other moron talking heads that spout bullshit aimed at ignorant people that caused the Republicans and Conservatives to lose the last two elections.
Maybe Americans aren't as stupid as you think they are, Conservatives?
Keeping the two party illusion alive is key to the success of the one corporate 'war party' controlling both.
Tweedledum and Tweedledee
Agreed to have a battle...
THEY were standing under a tree, each with an arm round the other's neck, and Alice knew which was which in a moment, because one of them had "DUM" embroidered on his collar, and the other "DEE". `I suppose they've each got "TWEEDLE" round at the back of the collar,' she said to herself.
Humans have come a long way. We truly have lived through some eras lacking understanding of intelligent civilization to the point of inhumanity. In the last 70 years especially, we have made such progress. These are truly enlightening times, where, not only is equality finally perceivable, but just how bright and intelligent all human beings can positively be, is also perceivable. Now that is undeniable achievement.
Rush is the Dems dream come true a Anti American POS with his communist followers
The true Pro American "Dr Paul" is treated like shit. I have had it with these fucking people that are not Pro America and for which it stands.
The Voters are far to uninformed to make the right choice and on top of all that the Israeli lobbyist that control and steal are wealth here and around the world are looked at with smiles as they draw there weapons on Americans and Americans welcomed this with glee
Here CNN goes again, promoting whatever Obama wants them to. First he has Geitner lie about Rush Limbaugh leading Republicans on NBC, now they reciprocate it with 3+ minutes of Rush's face on the screen with the words GOP Leader. What a joke. They're implanting it into the conscience. What a blatant sham!
I supported Ron Paul to the bitter end, but for the life of me I can not understand why he continues to associate himself with the Republican party. "Conservative Republicans" were responsible for 40% of the earmarks in the stimulus bill. They also continue to support AIG bailouts because Goldman Sachs owns lots of their credit default swaps, which means politicians will loose lots of money if AIG goes south.
PLEASE Dr. Paul, go independent! The Republican and Democratic parties have sold out!
Earmarks are the responsibility of Congress. If they don't put in earmarks for their constituents, then the Executive branch gets to decide on how to spend that money.
Its not like earmarks increases the budget. The budget is set and then the earmarks are put in, which decreases the amount left to spend in the budget.
That is the lamest bunch of bullshit I have ever read!! You have no earthly idea how bills are written and passed.
Earmarks are introduced INTO the budget by the sponsoring representative. There is NO FIXED DOLLAR AMOUNT you dumb ass. The dollar amount is the total of everything in the bill AFTER all the earmarks and proposals are totaled.
A mississippi representative has a earmark for a 1 million dollar fucking nature center. You call that conservative??
WTF, Rush the fascist pig who supported Bush. Hate mongering to the ignorant masses who need to put someone else down to feel good about themselves. Elected to the head of the Republican Party by the Main Stream Media.
Looks like CNN is trying to equate the Campaign for Liberty with the Republicans. After Eight Years of the Republican Anti-Liberty Campaign, I'm going to have a really hard time voting for any Republican, other than Ron Paul.
It was pure blasphemy to see an interview with a true patriot like Ron Paul preceded by a clip of the shameless bottom feeder, and blatant chicken hawk, "Pill Boy" Limbaugh. I can only hope they hosed the podium down prior to Dr. Paul speaking.
The media and the American woke up to Dr Pauls message one election too late. But at least more and more are waking up and understanding now what he is talking about.
The most successful and progressive country in the world economically is changing its global constituents. Credit should be thought of as the same level as pressure in your hose, voltage in your wall sockets, and gas in your tank.
We are all in this together and dividers will soon be weeded out as detriments to the conservative human beings of the US... but hey, the frog with one eye did not evolve either.
Where the fu*k were you, Rush, when the Bush administration spent trillions of dollars in the "war of terror"? When they (the previous admin) fu*king passed the "stimulus" bill?
It was sad to see an interview with a true patriot preceded by a clip of the shameless bottom feeder "Pill Boy" Limbaugh. I can only hope they hosed the podium down prior to Dr. Paul speaking.
I feel that trying to salvage the Republican or the Democrat party is futile. Both have obviously been hijacked by the 'perpetual war hawks' who present their candidates to the voting public as a 'choice'.
Dr. Paul, Kucinich, and few others are not players, or "Made Men", within that 'one' party syndicate. Both are lumps of gold in their respective outhouses.
I'd like to see them unite their wisdom under a new party that emphasized their common humanitarian views regarding foreign policy.
I liked Limbaugh when I was younger, but many time when I listen to him now, he sounds like a big government guy. He also sounds ignorant on a lot of topics.
Ron Paul: "I don't think so it a long way off i can hardly visualize what the country is going to be like then at the rate we've been deteriorating financially..."
Yeah, since the morons have been taking this country to the dark side and refuse to see the revolution they are pushing. I don't think Congressman Paul wants to be near the presidency when "it hits the fan."
So, on which side is Ron Paul really is?Dems or Reps?
dgeramie1 2 months ago
@dgeramie1 The people!
frkelsa 1 month ago
Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances, we guard you while you sleep. Do NOT fuck with us.
thorspinky 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul wants to legalize Drugs
Give out Guns
Ignore Swine Flu
Cut on our Defense system
let the Arabs free on what they want -
Any resident of NYC or any targeted City in the US better stop this guy before we get Crushed & NUKED!!!!
toknow07 2 years ago
I don't see why the primary support base for Ron Paul is young ppl? I mean, heck if you have Ron Paul...you no longer need Viagra.
blldgs101 2 years ago
@blldgs101 Because his ideas are young.
calimar28 11 months ago
The terrorists have already won this war if we keep giving up our liberties
webber1966 2 years ago 8
Liberals and Conservatives both suck. There is no difference between the Dems and Reps when they both are puppets for the NWO
RevoltAgainstTheNWO 2 years ago 5
Luffyqueen 2 years ago 7
Luffyqueen:
I think most of the individuals on your list of trolls that have declared war on Ron Paul are actually all the SAME person who has multiple accounts. I think, though he pretends to be a well intentioned liberal, that he's really a meanie neocon who's scared to death that the open minded, principled librarians are about to take control of the GOP away from the neocons and he's SCARED shitless.
Deep down he needs to see that NO ONE falls for his B.S. We ALL have him read like a book.
RonPaulRevolution4u 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
The NRA is giving FREE 1-yr memberships to everyone who wants to Join. They are trying to build up their membership to fight pending Legislation that impacts our right to keep and bear arms. It is very important that anti-gun congressmen see how many people they will have to fight to get their legislation through. We renamed the url. Just add tk to it.
NRA4Free.
PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!!!
Ron Paul/Rand Paul 2012
ONLY Doctors WILL HEAL Our Country
NoBailout4Banksters 2 years ago
Hey have you all heard the news yet? Obama wins Grammy for best actor!
LemonAndYoghurt 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Vote and show Time that Ron Paul has influenced you `100%.
Time100(.)tk
NoBailout4Banksters 2 years ago
We need to get the word out for Ron PAUL to take our country back! remember Germany was democratic when the Savior Hitler took over.
shyscape 2 years ago 3
Lets transplant Ron Pauls brain into Mitt Romney's body and win this thing in 2012.
coronet67 2 years ago 4
coronet67:
Mitt Romney is a blow dried, stand for NOTHING, flip flopping, dilettante, neocon opportunist is quest for nothing but POWER. He believes he's in a class above normal people and that his money, privilege, and "body" will buy him that power. NEVER over my dead "body"! We should want NOTHING to do with him, not even so much as his "body". I DESPISE everything about him.
If you had said "Arnold Schwarzenegger's body" most of us would have said "hey, GREAT", but Mitt Romney, NEVER.
RonPaulRevolution4u 2 years ago 3
Everything I know of Ron Paul he is a great man. I respect him a lot and even thought i didnt fit in with the "grassroots" movement revolution thing I went out and stood with them and did what I could to get him elected. I just wish he was electable in our current popularity contest electoral system.
coronet67 2 years ago 3
coronet67:
People like Ron Paul will become more and more popular, and more and more electable when they realize that everything the blow dried politicians from the mainstream of BOTH the 2 big parties have failed. Warmonger neoconsevatism has failed. The Democrats record spending,debt, borrowing, and high taxation will fail.
In the end, when all else has failed, and they'll realize how duped they've been by all these blow dried phonies, they'll start LISTENING to someone like Ron Paul.
RonPaulRevolution4u 2 years ago 5
Ron's laugh... he sounds like Yoda.
VlaamsSoldat 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
danbowski40 2 years ago
Proven, as a virtual judgment.
Guilty on all charges, virtuall, morphology, and even deontology, and penology.
All of it together has proven in the ongoing of quadruplication that they are shut down and destroyed.
iydsysstole101 2 years ago
"I repeat--Money Market Mutual Funds are NOT part of the banking system! They are mutual funds that invest in T-bills and commercial paper."
I read into it and now I understand your point, I don't understand why he included that in the measurement either. But there is a lot of evidence out there that shows how much more capital the federal reserve has "printed" in the past decade. Increased gov't spending = more printing, inflation. The fed also lowered interest rates for borrowing banks.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
Federal Reserve - I'll admit I was shocked when I went to their website. For the 8 year period the blogger was talking about--M1 grew 37% which is 20% more than GDP (17%) for the same period. So, if the goal is to keep the money supply neutral--that is 20% too much. But, from Oct 08 - Jan 09, they increased M1 by 100%!! That's unprecedented.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
"But, from Oct 08 - Jan 09, they increased M1 by 100%!! That's unprecedented."
Wow, that is absurd. I didn't even know that.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
"A society of sheep must in time beget a government of wolves."
~ Bertrand de Jouvenel
Blackjack555 2 years ago
Like what he says or not, Ron Paul is a genius.
submison 2 years ago
Sick?...Commiting US TROOPS to a war that was never formally declared, which allows the politicians to POLITICIZE THE ENTIRE EVENT to improve their electability is whats SICK! Dont send MY BROTHERS to a fight with their hands tied and then pretend you are supporting our troops.
99swampfox99 2 years ago
You can agree or disagree with him, but you have to admit that Ron Paul is just an all around good guy.
beezalax13 2 years ago
Anyone notice how the host is surprised that a 72 year old "white" guy is appealing to young people? As if a 72 year old black guy would? or even a 42 year old black guy would more? Why was there an emphasis on the 72 year old white guy?
Slapcorn 2 years ago
"i think its pretty sad" ron paul says lol! it is said.
and Rush Limbaugh Supported Bush! he sucks. ron paul is the only true republican. sarah palin and romney sucks
LetsRapeGovernment 2 years ago
Rush Limbaugh Supported Bush = Nuff' Said!
Ron Paul is the only member of the Republican Party , morally, I can support. I voted for him in the Georgia Primary and I still support him. Obama is just continuing the Bush policies.
God help the USA
hyylo 2 years ago
SUPPORT OUR TROOPS! You people make me sick.
AcidTrout 2 years ago
yes i totally agree, SUPPORT OUR TROOPS, bring them ALL home, NOW! Youre right, people ,make me sick also. Leaving soldiers to die in countries that have been fighting the same wars for 1600 years. When there never even was a declaration of war!
rastafarley 2 years ago
lol, I'm just messing with yall
AcidTrout 2 years ago
Ron Paul received the most campaign money from AMERICAN troops.The troops want to come home and end this fake war.
hyylo 2 years ago
hahaha. you make me laugh
Ron Paul received the most campaign money from AMERICAN troops. This ia FACT. look on google if you do not believe me. The troops want to come home and end this fake war.
hyylo 2 years ago
LOL, I was yanking ya chain
AcidTrout 2 years ago
After Obama puts us in a further mess (economically and socially), Ron Paul will be the only answer.
RP12
TheOtherView 2 years ago 2
Republicans are the type of people who will take the ship down if they're sinking. They have no qualms about murdering their fellow citizens and public servants if they don't get their way.
discorsage 2 years ago
CNN and Ron Paul are buying the DNC/White house propaganda. All the Democrats are trying to do is to take focus away from the budget and the mistakes the current administration is making. Same BS Clinton pulled 96'.
jbpage78 2 years ago
Ron Paul has spoken out a lot against what the Obama administration is doing and doesn't support any of these government bailouts. Get your facts straight.
theodaman420 2 years ago
moron, I didn't say he didn't speak out against the bailouts. All I said is that he was allowing the Limbaugh issue to draw his focus from the real issue. Read before you write garbage you bafoon
jbpage78 2 years ago
@jbpage78 My point was he clearly wasn't buying into any of the democratic propaganda like you stated. He is more against reckless spending than anyone. His platform isn't close to Obama at all. Practice what you preach, fuckhead.
theodaman420 6 months ago
RON PAUL 2012
dartfrog731 2 years ago
what personal liberties are we losing??
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
"what personal liberties are we losing??"
Now now, let's use our brain here. What happens when the U.S. spends too much? That's right, the value of the dollar goes down, and the economy gets worse. What does that mean? Less economic opportunity, less stability. And these things impair the "pursuit of happiness," what I would call a liberty.
Constitutional liberties: The Patriot Act is an invasion of privacy, right to bear arms is wavering, etc.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
Questions for Mindless: 1) Would you say that our freely elected representatives, profit-max mortgage companies, and free-to-be irresponsible home buyers--have made Adam Smith turn over in his grave? 2) Are you so sure that "pursuit of happiness" is in the Constitution? 3) Why do Mexican drug cartels come to our government-controlled market to shop for their assault weapons?
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
1. I'm not saying the home buyers are irresponsible. The government WANTED them to get their loans. Why do you think Fan Mae and Fred Mac were given reduced interest rates when borrowing?
2. I never said it was. I started talking about the Constitution in my second point.
3. They are SMUGGLED. Smuggling is illegal. This is why we need our troops to protect the border, not the overseas empire. But consider this: drugs would be far cheaper if they were legal. Illegal drugs are good business
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
1. It takes 2 to Tango. Private debt rocketed from 150% of GDP in the 80's to 335% of GDP by 2006. From 2004-2006, 2/3 of the mortgage-backed securities were issued by the private sector, 1/3 by Fannie & Freddie--and, none of theirs were sub-prime.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
1. Private debt increase was caused by keynesian economic policies... (spending for growth).
"In the period of time since 2001, the Federal Reserve caused an increase in the supply of checkbook-money capital of more than 70 percent of the cumulative total amount it had created in the previous 88 years of its existence: almost 2 trillion dollars" (mises(.)org(.)story(.)3165)
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
Public debt is directly related to Keynesian economics, not private debt. I checked-out the link-- Checkbook money capital is not something the Federal Reserve measures. And I dont understand the logic of adding Money Market Mutual Fund deposits to M1 and dividing the by the bank reserves. Bank deposits are regulated by the Federal Reserve; Money Market Mutual Funds are under the oversight of an impotent SEC.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
"Public debt is directly related to Keynesian economics, not private debt."
No, private debt is a calculation of total consumer credit. Keynesian economics are directly geared toward "monetary stimulation" of private industries.
"Checkbook money capital is not something the Federal Reserve measures."
Irrelevant. If you look at the bottom of the article where it says "Notes" and look at 5, "checkbook money capital" simply means the total checking deposits of the federal reserve.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
"No, private debt is a calculation of total consumer credit. Keynesian economics are directly geared toward "monetary stimulation" of private industries."
If you don't know the definitions, or just want to obfusicate, it's really pointless to carry this any further.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
"And I dont understand the logic of adding Money Market Mutual Fund deposits to M1 and dividing the by the bank reserves."
Because M1 exceeds the bank reserve's amount of actual money. The writer in the article explains it better than I can if you look at the rest of the paragraph where the citation is (#5).
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
M1 will always exceed the bank's reserves--since the reserve requirement is 10%. His charge that the Federal Reserve System has acted irresponsibly should be backed up by data about the banking system--and not by a measurement he invented that doesn't pertain. I repeat--Money Market Mutual Funds are NOT part of the banking system! They are mutual funds that invest in T-bills and commercial paper. (Do you understand what I'm saying?)
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
1. As for the loans, I'm talking about pre-2001, during the Clinton administration. The fact is, Cisneros purposely manipulated loaning requirements so that more people could be given loans (more sub-prime loans). As expected, these loans had a low return rate. The people were basically handed money with very little requirement on their part. It isn't the fault of the banks, it is the fault of the Clinton Adminstration and the fed for purposely "encouraging" banks to issue these loans.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
The fact is, Fannie and Freddie didnt do any subprime lending, because they cant: the definition of a subprime loan is precisely a loan that doesnt meet the requirement, imposed by law, that Fannie and Freddie buy only mortgages issued to borrowers who made substantial down payments and carefully documented their income.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
"The fact is, Fannie and Freddie didnt do any subprime lending, because they cant: the definition of a subprime loan is precisely a loan that doesnt meet the requirement, imposed by law"
Look, the requirements imposed by law were lowered, this way all the loans that were PREVIOUSLY sub-prime were no longer consider such. I'll leave it at that, because I already explained when and why this happened in another post.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
Last shot. Your point is that GSE's lowered standards and this resulted in the credit crisis. My point is that 1) both before and after 2001 there were SUB-PRIME mortgages--but they were made by private mortgage companies. As sub-prime (higher risk), they had higher interest rates. 2) They did not conform to the GSE's underwriting standards, they were bundled, insured, rated AAA and sold to investors, retirement funds, etc. 3) The melt-down of SUB-PRIME market started the credit crisis.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
8-5-08 issue of The Village Voice paraphrased: "Cuomo took actions that helped plunge Fannie and Freddie into the subprime markets without creating the means to monitor their increasingly risky investments. He turned the Federal Housing Administration mortgage program into a lender with sky-high loans and no money down, and he legalized what a federal judge has branded "kickbacks" to brokers that have fueled the sale of unsupportable loans. 3-4 million families now are facing foreclosure."
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
"My point is that 1) both before and after 2001 there were SUB-PRIME mortgages--but they were made by private mortgage companies."
I'm sorry but this is simply UNTRUE. Fan Mae and Fred Mac now own or guarantee about $1.4 trillion, or 40%, of all U.S. mortgages, with $168 billion in subprime mortgages.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
Yes and no. I relied on Paul Krugman's op-ed as my only source and it turns out he was EGREGIOUSLY wrong. (I thought I was on safe ground with a Nobel prize winner)
But in a technical way I'm still right. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac don't "make" any mortgages--they only buy and insure them.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
I relied on Paul Krugman's op-ed as my only source and it turns out he was EGREGIOUSLY wrong. (I thought I was on safe ground with a Nobel prize winner)"
The nobel prize has sort of lost its objectivity in my opinion.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
The Nobel Prize has been politicized over the years and now the winners come from a certain socialist / leftist /philosophical ideaology. Krugman is a Keynesian supply sider, a philosophy that has been proven to be wrong.
pretorious700 2 years ago
3. Your answered "how", not "why". Drug gangs seek out guns in the United States because the gun-control laws are far tougher in Mexico. Mexican civilians must get approval from the military to buy guns and they cannot own large-caliber rifles or high-powered pistols, which are considered military weapons
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
Your answered "how", not "why". Drug gangs seek out guns in the United States because the gun-control laws are far tougher in Mexico."
I know that. But it is a cheap question in the first place because it assumes that increasing gun laws is the only way to solve the problem. Plus the drug lords are not just smuggling guns that are legal in the U.S.. There have been reports of fully automatic US-made M4 rifles and sometimes even grenade launchers. So you wouldn't be solving the problem anyway
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
Im sorry you dont find a comparison of gun control in this country to that of a third-world country enlightening. If we dont try to help solve the deleterious effects drug money and smuggled assault weapons are having on the Mexican government, we could end up with a Lebanon on our border.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
"Im sorry you dont find a comparison of gun control in this country to that of a third-world country enlightening."
And I proposed two solutions to the problem in a previous post. #1 Legalize the drugs. #2 Use some of the troops on the border instead of overseas. We dont need our 700+ military bases around the world. There are some exceptions, but a lot of our military bases are superfluous.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
#1 - I would defer to the world's oldest civilization in these matters. "Opium has a harm. Opium is a poison, undermining our good customs and morality. Its use is prohibited by law." --Chinese Empire's ban in 1810, after two wars over it with the British Empire.
#2 - This is that stupid idea that is bandied about by xenophobes. Border protection a "border patrol" (police) function. It is not a MILITARY MISSION! (it's brainless, really)
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
#1 - That quote was BEFORE they lost the two wars and were forced to legalize opium by imperialistic Britain (the wars were after 1810). Just to clarify.
Also the drug laws are having harmful effects on the economy and the prison system grows. Drugs flourish anyway, even with the strict laws.
#2 - By "border protection" I didn't mean barring illegal immigrants. I differ from Ron Paul in that I very much lean towards open immigration. I meant smuggling prevention. That IS a military mission.
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
Open immigration with a third word country only hurts America. Most of the mexicans that come here illegaly have no intention on living up to American standards, in fact a big percentage of them live in complete scwable so they can send as much money back to mexico as possible since they have no intention of staying indefinatly. In doing this they can under cut Americans that need too make a good wage in order to live a good midleclass life. Thats just the tip of the iceberg of downsides.
Filucky 2 years ago
#1 "harmful effects" - no argument there; but they are known. What's unknown by all but the Chinese is the harmful effects of 25% of the population addicted to opium.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
#2 - Why misuse our military for police work? If back in this country, they need to be training for war. If the Mexican war lords over-run the Border Patrol with their Colt M-4a's and 50 cal's and take Arizona, then call in the US Army.
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
"Why misuse our military for police work?"
#2 I would agree with you here, but because the police are obviously not doing their job, how else can you stop the smuggling? Like I said before, a significant portion of the smuggled weapons are already illegal to american citizens (fully automatics, grenades, stingers, etc)
MindlessGlitch 2 years ago
RON PAUL 2012.... BEST MAN FOR THE JOB HANDS DOWN. IT'S BULLSHIT HE DIDN'T GET THE PRIMARY IN 08 AND ITS BULLSHIT THAT THE MEDIA IS SO NEGATIVE TOWARDS HIM...... EVER WONDER WHY???... YEA YOU PEOPLE NEED TO WAKE THE HELL UP. HOW MUCH MORE IS IT GOING TO TAKE TO OPEN THE AMERICAN PEOPLE'S EYES?? I am a 23 yr old student of business and marketing and I support this man whole heartedly. DO YOUR HOMEWORK PEOPLE IT IS AT THE MOMENT STILL OUR COUNTRY.... BUT ANY MORE PROCRASTINATION AND IT WON'T BE
charles54l 2 years ago 3
read the book by peter schiff to understand ron paul.
hyylo 2 years ago
You need to read FREE TO CHOOSE by Milton Friedman and WEALTH OF NATIONS by Adam Smith.
You act as if Ron Paul came up with these concepts himself. They have been around for centuries. It's just that nobody in this generation had heard of them until Paul came on the national scene.
Get off your knees and stop blowing Ron Paul, you troll. As if your support of him somehow puts you outside the mainstream.
mbelma6329 2 years ago
mbelma6329.... I bow to no one my friend.... I am very passionate about my life and my future, I believe in order for things to start changing for the better in this country we must first have someone to be a tool for a change.... someone to help pull back the curtain on all the conspiracy jargon.... even at the least he would try to get rid of the corruption that has been looming and ruining this country for decades... I see a glimpse of hope for politics in ron paul...I am open for suggestions
charles54l 2 years ago
What is funny about your statement is that Ron Paul has been in poitics for over 30 years and now that the mainstream media has shined a spotlight on him, you act like he is something fresh and new.
The only thing you're telling me is that you buy whatever the media is selling you. I'm not saying he is not a revolutionary politician, but only that his followers have the most minute grasp of politics and the inner workings of Government.
Turn off the TV.
hustleredji 2 years ago
If the Ron Paul supporters "have the most minute grasp of politics and the inner workings of Government," and if they are the ones that need to "Turn off the TV," then something is wrong here... I believe Ron Paul supporters in general would have a better grasp of politics and certainly a better grasp of the constitution than the average joe. And if the media is selling Ron Paul to people, it's certainly one hell of a soft sell... Or a reverse psychology sell?
peifferjr1 2 years ago
1) youtube is procrastinators' heaven; 2) let's assume we are awake, eyes are open--what are we looking for? 3) isn't "wholehearted" one word, college guy?
JuanVoyce 2 years ago
I think the US needed Ron Paul in 2004 or earlier. 2008 might have been soon enough to turn things around, but 2012? :( We won't recognize the place by then, I'm afraid.
drutter 2 years ago
i agree.
tonylee1973 2 years ago
Republicans rejected Ron Paul, and tried for the safe bet. That is the exact reason why they were ousted, compromising their positions and not standing for core values. I didn't like either candidate. I no longer care about the safe bet. If Ron runs in 2012, I'm voting for him.
Kraziken0 2 years ago
its a shame he didn't get this kind of exposure during the campain.
unifiedfielder 2 years ago
Supporters of Ron Paul: We need to get out the message of HR 1207! It is a bill Ron Paul is introducing now in the house to force the federal reserve to be audited. This is political gold if we can get people to talk about it! Who on earth would argue against it!
mccarthy71 2 years ago 4
Why dont our president sue the oil company and the united nations too ! They put a way to price on oil to hurt all the economy of the world!! When there where a war!! If our country can sue the tobacco company for hurting us why not the oil!! We was attacked by the oil company to hurt the economy of the world!!
ladyblue614 2 years ago
In what court do you think the president could sue United Nations? The U.S. can only legislate in their own country and the opinion of some price being too high does not make a great legal case in a "free market" economy. If it did I would be suing all kinds of companies left and right.
SickleDH 2 years ago
That was like English, but different.
MoonPotato 2 years ago
I voted for Obama when it was him vs mccain.
ChaoticSouls 2 years ago
Is there anyone here who supported Ron Paul but voted for Obama in the general election? I would like to hear your voice so I can ask a few questions.
mbelma6329 2 years ago
Its a shame the Republican party tried to abort him in the primaries.
Republicans ate their young, when they tried to ditch Ron Paul.
Ill be looking for land to grow my own food, and keeping gold
fishwagon 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
KGB(FSB) leaked report:
9/11 was secret job by some Jews Engineer who worked in pentagon disable the pilot mode, enabled the Auto pilot mode and control the Plane by high frequency Antenna from a secret room in pentagon.
proofs:
1. Most Jews worked Twine Tower took sick leave in 9/11.
2. Osama got in secret 359 million from Israeli secret service and 257 million USD from US Govt. in Soviet Union period.
3. 'Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11 by FBI'
But why!
MonsterIsrael 2 years ago
4.Laden worked before for money.
5.Laden family were flown out next day of 911 from US when no fly was enforced on US land
6.Sadam Hussian boomed Israel in 1st Gulf war, consequences US invade Iraq.
7.Laden was not captured yet,because the truth will come out.
8.Pakistani passport do not recognize Israel as country, Israel attacked pakistan before, Now, US tried it, AIPAC member like Obama.
Recommendation: Need more investigation.
MonsterIsrael 2 years ago
Rash Limburger stinks of COINTELPRO...jest like Gwenn Becky
Siriusluv 2 years ago
The last thing he said, was the scariest s*#@ I have ever heard.
Bobster986 2 years ago
End the federal reserve
bring our troops home
Obama is the same as Bush
PETER SCHIFF and Ron Paul are my heros
hyylo 2 years ago 6
Rush Limbaugh is bought and sold by the big Republican Party bosses. He is a piece of pompous trash. He doesn't give a damn about our personal liberties.
Down with Rush the fatass!
Upwards with Ron Paul, BraveHeart!
Ron Paul is our man in Washington! He is the voice of truth and honesty. Ron Paul for President in 2012!
SmerkNomGool 2 years ago 4
End the federal reserve
bring our troops home
Obama is the same as Bush
PETER SCHIFF and Ron Paul are my heros
hyylo 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ron paul is this bitter pathetic old man who just can't accept his destiny bravely and honourably that he'll never be the US president. sorry old man.
bitricky 2 years ago
hey asshole, it isnt his destiny or goal to be president....he is quite happy with promoting the message of liberty and influencing millions of people to think the same....
gsrxx420xx 2 years ago 4
I love Paul but no on the 2012. Paul is too old to be president till 2016. We need a new face, a younger face.
kathicII 2 years ago
i guess you want some liar like obama. ron paul and peter schiff are true americans.
End the federal reserve
bring our troops home
Obama is the same as Bush
hyylo 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How did you get that I like Obama? I love Paul, but he is 73 for god's sake. Thats old as dirt. Thats older than Jon McCain! He would be in office for a year and then die of old age. A 77+ year old president is not a good thing.
kathicII 2 years ago
just because he is old makes him non electable?
Your such an idiot.
Stop with the bullshit . you dont support ron paul. your one of those pigs from fox news.
hyylo 2 years ago
thats what you fucktards said about mccain
mbelma6329 2 years ago
i'm trying to educate you. go to college or university and read some books.
dont complain about why others are rich and why you are poor. the people who are rich went to school and educated themselves.
hyylo 2 years ago
Who the fuck are you taking to? And what are you blabbering about?
mbelma6329 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
read the book by peter schiff to understand ron paul.
hyylo 2 years ago
Well, he is attracting plenty of youngblood. There are tons of under 40 people who are with Dr. Paul. Even if we don't get Ron Paul to run again, and even if he is too old as some say, he is bringing in a lot of youger people who are on the same track as him.
HeadTater 2 years ago
I agree, he is attracting young blood. But he himself is too old. We need a new standard barer for the future.
Oh yea, and LOL @ the moron who said I was from Fox. What are you a 9/11 truther?
kathicII 2 years ago
Ron paul is my president .... fuck obama
danielstwin 2 years ago
Paul remains loyal to a Republican party that has been hijacked. Kucinich remains loyal to a Democrat party, by looking at Obama's foreign policy, economic policy, his cabinet, and their House Speaker, also appears to have been hijacked.
Efforts to salvage either party should be abandoned, imo. It's time for the few honest, progressive politicians to unite, despite their differences, under one banner and take on the war hawks that have a stranglehold on the other two (?) parties.
mete1954 2 years ago
Ron Paul is my President!
atik04 2 years ago 4
What a total insult to Ron Paul. can you believe how snake low these wicked corporate owners are going against your liberty. Limbaugh is a bought & paid for ass tool for the military industrial complex. Rush Limbaugh against Ron Paul???
My blood is boiling over this one.
Cantwetalk 2 years ago 2
I do work for "Campaign for Liberty", if you'er not a member,sign up. We'er fighting for your rights, and we could use your help.
LexiconDevil01 2 years ago 3
limba is an oxycontin chompin' international sex tourist
TokenTombstone 2 years ago
"Pretty sad!" <--- GOP
SapientiaEtFortuna 2 years ago
I used to like to hear Rush, back during the Cold War Days when he was right, and funny.
Today he's obviously gone off the deep end. Today he's obviously just a high paid NeoCon propagandist. Too bad he's not funny anymore. These days he just comes off as pompous arrogant ignorant, who is full of himself. He embodies the: "The blind leading the blind towards a cliff"
For the salvation of the Republican Party.
Ron Paul for President in 2012 !!
Vote for The Champion of The U.S. Constitution
Back2WeThePeople 2 years ago 4
good for him
heres22 2 years ago
ron paul.
keep up the good work, for those that cant , we rely on you.
thank you.
soofunny01 2 years ago 7
Ron Paul is right at usual, it's the Idiot Faux-Conservatives like Rush Limbaugh and all the other moron talking heads that spout bullshit aimed at ignorant people that caused the Republicans and Conservatives to lose the last two elections.
Maybe Americans aren't as stupid as you think they are, Conservatives?
CarryANation 2 years ago 5
Keeping the two party illusion alive is key to the success of the one corporate 'war party' controlling both.
Tweedledum and Tweedledee
Agreed to have a battle...
THEY were standing under a tree, each with an arm round the other's neck, and Alice knew which was which in a moment, because one of them had "DUM" embroidered on his collar, and the other "DEE". `I suppose they've each got "TWEEDLE" round at the back of the collar,' she said to herself.
Lewis Carroll
"Through the Looking Glass"
mete1954 2 years ago
Rush is a paid idiot for the elite to stir up right left bullshit.
He can rot in hell...
He never mentioned Ron Paul once during the race.
RP4409 2 years ago 6
Ron Paul 2012
WashMitt 2 years ago 6
rate 5 stars on all Ron Paul videos you watch to spread the word!
go Ron Paul!
harryinitiative 2 years ago 6
Ron Paul is awesome!
CivilRadiant 2 years ago 8
Veterans for Ron Paul.
vicnameless 2 years ago 6
romney is the leader. not limbaugh
fedorvonbock16 2 years ago
Why do I fined my self agreeing with Rush L?? I have hated this guy sense the 80's. Wow the Democrats are fucking this up.
Now hit that thumbs down baby!
shampoovta 2 years ago 2
bcoz the sad thing is that he has some good points, but right or wrong limbaugh is still a peace of shit
MIDNIGHTRlDER 2 years ago
Liberals for Ron paul
samsher92 2 years ago 8
i dont think ron paul will run again do to his age .
kingbrandor 2 years ago
raul paul = win
dabobrow 2 years ago 4
Humans have come a long way. We truly have lived through some eras lacking understanding of intelligent civilization to the point of inhumanity. In the last 70 years especially, we have made such progress. These are truly enlightening times, where, not only is equality finally perceivable, but just how bright and intelligent all human beings can positively be, is also perceivable. Now that is undeniable achievement.
StarQualityWins 2 years ago
Rush is the Dems dream come true a Anti American POS with his communist followers
The true Pro American "Dr Paul" is treated like shit. I have had it with these fucking people that are not Pro America and for which it stands.
The Voters are far to uninformed to make the right choice and on top of all that the Israeli lobbyist that control and steal are wealth here and around the world are looked at with smiles as they draw there weapons on Americans and Americans welcomed this with glee
WarDogLRS 2 years ago
Ron Paul is that leader. I think it's clear who the true republican is in the GOP.
vjr1113 2 years ago 5
Comment removed
LiquidMetalBand 2 years ago
Yea, racism is okay when directed at Ron Paul. In fact, any smear is. These people hate the true spirit of America/the real republican party.
I can't believe how much more the media invited Ron Paul to their shows AFTER THE ELECTION WAS OVER.!
Sheogorath64 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
LiquidMetalBand 2 years ago 2
Here CNN goes again, promoting whatever Obama wants them to. First he has Geitner lie about Rush Limbaugh leading Republicans on NBC, now they reciprocate it with 3+ minutes of Rush's face on the screen with the words GOP Leader. What a joke. They're implanting it into the conscience. What a blatant sham!
BooBTuberToo 2 years ago
the one guy that could make me sort of consider goin for the repubs . . .
Kmath 2 years ago 2
Ron Paul as President, Dennis Kucinich as VP, Peter Schiff as Treasury Secretary...the dream team.
MadMann73 2 years ago 3
I admit Ron Paul will be maybe to old for 2012, but hopefully his son Rand Paul will run if he dosen't.
fabregatoribio 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
ron paul for president
anilraj420 2 years ago
Rush's role is to lick the balls of the Republican party. He's just an entertainer.
carrierexchange 2 years ago 7
I supported Ron Paul to the bitter end, but for the life of me I can not understand why he continues to associate himself with the Republican party. "Conservative Republicans" were responsible for 40% of the earmarks in the stimulus bill. They also continue to support AIG bailouts because Goldman Sachs owns lots of their credit default swaps, which means politicians will loose lots of money if AIG goes south.
PLEASE Dr. Paul, go independent! The Republican and Democratic parties have sold out!
cajunsatan 2 years ago 2
Earmarks are the responsibility of Congress. If they don't put in earmarks for their constituents, then the Executive branch gets to decide on how to spend that money.
Its not like earmarks increases the budget. The budget is set and then the earmarks are put in, which decreases the amount left to spend in the budget.
mortikhi 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul is a DA and will never be elected anything than more than what he is
cktuba 2 years ago
That is the lamest bunch of bullshit I have ever read!! You have no earthly idea how bills are written and passed.
Earmarks are introduced INTO the budget by the sponsoring representative. There is NO FIXED DOLLAR AMOUNT you dumb ass. The dollar amount is the total of everything in the bill AFTER all the earmarks and proposals are totaled.
A mississippi representative has a earmark for a 1 million dollar fucking nature center. You call that conservative??
Go back to the heard you dumb ass.
cajunsatan 2 years ago
WTF, Rush the fascist pig who supported Bush. Hate mongering to the ignorant masses who need to put someone else down to feel good about themselves. Elected to the head of the Republican Party by the Main Stream Media.
Looks like CNN is trying to equate the Campaign for Liberty with the Republicans. After Eight Years of the Republican Anti-Liberty Campaign, I'm going to have a really hard time voting for any Republican, other than Ron Paul.
Republican, the newest third party in America.
WeBeGood06 2 years ago 2
It was pure blasphemy to see an interview with a true patriot like Ron Paul preceded by a clip of the shameless bottom feeder, and blatant chicken hawk, "Pill Boy" Limbaugh. I can only hope they hosed the podium down prior to Dr. Paul speaking.
mete1954 2 years ago 2
why is Ron Paul even at CPAC?
all these phony, lying, deceiving scumbags don't deserve to have a voice!
they are no better then the dems!
Ron Paul sir, please try to distance yourself from these fake republicans and this ugly fat radio talk show host.
we need a new party!
the libertarian party!
nandatebayo666 2 years ago 3
The media and the American woke up to Dr Pauls message one election too late. But at least more and more are waking up and understanding now what he is talking about.
rundoetx 2 years ago 4
rush limbaugh is an idiot, Ron Paul rules
kingnek 2 years ago 5
Go Ron!!
Aadryk 2 years ago 7
I 2nd King Paul
Budvb 2 years ago 5
King Paul
spanishaustralian 2 years ago 5
Absolute 100% conservative capitalism (GOP) failure.
The most successful and progressive country in the world economically is changing its global constituents. Credit should be thought of as the same level as pressure in your hose, voltage in your wall sockets, and gas in your tank.
We are all in this together and dividers will soon be weeded out as detriments to the conservative human beings of the US... but hey, the frog with one eye did not evolve either.
historico69 2 years ago
yea you are absolutely right! conservatives are fucktards!
bitricky 2 years ago
no...
neoconservatives are fucktards!
HeadTater 2 years ago 2
Where the fu*k were you, Rush, when the Bush administration spent trillions of dollars in the "war of terror"? When they (the previous admin) fu*king passed the "stimulus" bill?
Fu*king hypocrite.
hkongfan 2 years ago 8
Excellent Dr. Paul.:)
Quiltskate 2 years ago 5
PS:
It was sad to see an interview with a true patriot preceded by a clip of the shameless bottom feeder "Pill Boy" Limbaugh. I can only hope they hosed the podium down prior to Dr. Paul speaking.
mete1954 2 years ago 7
I feel that trying to salvage the Republican or the Democrat party is futile. Both have obviously been hijacked by the 'perpetual war hawks' who present their candidates to the voting public as a 'choice'.
Dr. Paul, Kucinich, and few others are not players, or "Made Men", within that 'one' party syndicate. Both are lumps of gold in their respective outhouses.
I'd like to see them unite their wisdom under a new party that emphasized their common humanitarian views regarding foreign policy.
mete1954 2 years ago 4
Ron Paul is the real president!
garoad2 2 years ago 6
God, I wish Ron Paul was President!
johnrocks1776 2 years ago 10
I've been saying the same thing. I Couldn't agree more. LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC!
breedsauce101 2 years ago
I liked Limbaugh when I was younger, but many time when I listen to him now, he sounds like a big government guy. He also sounds ignorant on a lot of topics.
akai1sora 2 years ago 2
will you run again in 2012?.....
Ron Paul: "I don't think so it a long way off i can hardly visualize what the country is going to be like then at the rate we've been deteriorating financially..."
Ouch. Thats pretty heavy.
CommanderYo 2 years ago 5
Yeah, since the morons have been taking this country to the dark side and refuse to see the revolution they are pushing. I don't think Congressman Paul wants to be near the presidency when "it hits the fan."
cowboy1165 2 years ago 3