@MrCohibaboy that's what hitler said, and that's what hitler tried to do. You have the moral conscience of a psychopathic dicator and yet still I would never persecute you, let alone "remove you from this earth."
Australia is a neanderthal joke. One of their icons is near death, and all they can comment on his sexuality, or deride homosexuality. Maybe it's because u are full of Irish convicts and wog immigrants that means u are still in the dark ages
fucking poofter , hope the fall knocked some sense back into that skull , and maybe just maybe he will awaken and understand the being a poofter is a sickness.
@MrCohibaboy , oh i think not. In any event, you are a joke, bigots like you have become an ever smaller crazed minority spewing hatred, it would be laughable were it not so sad
@noirkitten , sounds like you are doing a delicious bit of stereotyping about gay men yourselves. News flash, a gay bay is just that, if you don't like gays, why go there?
Molly is awesome. I've bumped into him on many dance floors at parties over the years and he is always happy to chat to random people for ages. Really great guy...and he has a hot boyfriend too.
@noirkitten I think you will find 'bitch' and 'cunt' are commonly used through out Australia, not just in Gay bars, in fact, I now live in Canada, and 80 percent of my mates are in fact straight Australians, both male and female, and we all used these two words day in and day out..as for the term 'Rice Queens' and 'Old queen'..we openly use these terms in our community as tongue and cheek along with words like twinks and Queer to name a couple..
@noirkitten I think you will find 'bitch' and 'cunt' are commonly used through out Australia, not just in Gay bars, in fact, I now live in Canada, and 80 percent of my mates are in fact straight Australians, both male and female, and we all used these two words day in and day out..as for the term 'Rice Queens' and 'Old queen'..we openly use these terms in our community as tongue and cheek along with words like twinks and Queer to name a couple..
@noirkitten I think you will find 'bitch' and 'cunt' are commonly used through out Australia, not just in Gay bars, in fact, I now live in Canada, and 80 percent of my mates are in fact straight Australians, both male and female, and we all used these two words day in and day out..as for the term 'Rice Queens' and 'Old queen'..we openly use these terms in our community as tongue and cheek along with words like twinks and Queer to name a couple..
I am proud to be straight, but for some reason having a straight parade or a straight party or a straight bar is 'discrimination'. What a bloody joke.
@TheNimbusMan straight people aren't kicked out of home for being straight, beaten up at pubs or in dark alleys for being straight, disciminated at by the law and the government for being straight, forced into the closet or told to lie about their sexuality for being straight....you see the difference?
@rednogo yeh i'm not a bigot I have gay friends actually, but I still don't agree with it. I just don't think laws should permit the practice of gay marriage, simply because it isn't natural. Can you say that it is natural?
@mrthisbeflute Love is the most natural thing for any human being. So yes it is natural for two people to love each other and want to get married and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. As for having gay friends well you couldn't be much of a friend if you believe them to be unnatural.
I don't understand people like you who feel the need to watch every video in regard to a subject that you don't believe is unnatural and make the same comment.
@Ilikemustard Jesus said if the people of Sodom had seen his miracles, they would have repented. This generation seems to be hard of heart, just like the Isralites were in Jesus's day.
It is not possible to prove god's existence if you define god as omnipotent. Omnipotence defies logic, and an omnipotent being cannot logically exist, and this is easily proved due to the fact that an omnipotent being cannot create and control another omnipotent being. Don't tell me god exists "outside logic", if he does that means he is untestable in which case YOU do not have any evidence of his existence and therefore your belief is unfounded.
@Ilikemustard God has already proven his existance. The Heavens and the Earth declare the works of His hands. It has nothing to do with being "oustide logic". That is an atheistic red herring. People deny the reality of God so they can falsely believe they can be their own God, decide what is wrong and right for themselves. This is why so many atheists are homosexuals. God could easily free them from this bondage but they would rather live in darkness than come to a knowledge of the light.
The existence of earth is no more evidence of the christian god than it is of the flying spaghetti monster you dolt. This is based on the tired old "we know a painting had a painter, therefore we know the universe had a creator" argument, right? No, this is stupid. We know a painting had a painter because we have seen a painting being painted before. If I locked a man in a cage from birth, so that he never sees the outside world, he cannot deduce that a painting requires a painter. -continued-
It is the same with the universe, we did not witness the creation of a universe, therefore we cannot deduce that it required a creator.
And this all ignores the fact that even if the universe was evidence of a creator, it is not evidence of YOUR god. Why is it no evidence of Allah, or Zeus, or Thor?
Being "outside logic" is not an atheistic red herring, it is an argument that was made by other christians. You did not address my argument about an omnipotent god being illogical. -continued-
So what is your counter to my claim that an omnipotent being is ILLOGICAL? It cannot exist in our reality due to the multiple paradoxes of omnipotence.
I do not deny the reality of god so that I can "be my own god". That is a blatant fucking strawman, do not tell me what my own stance is. I don't believe in god because of the lack of evidence. I don't believe in santa, unicorns or leprechauns for the same reason. -continued-
@Ilikemustard There is a major flaw in your inference that the creation did not requirea creator. First, the universe can not be infinitely old, as an infinite time must have passed to reach the present, also, accorinding to the universe's own laws, and infinitely old universe would have burnt itself out an infinite time ago. So the universe had a beginning. Now, the universe was either brought in being by a personal or impersonal cause. Cont'
@savedbyjesusblood The impersonal cause, with on intelligence or attributes pertaining within, can not be responsible for a universe of order. Just like creating an ax head, an outside force, this case a person would have been the personal force responsible for shaping the stone to an axe. So a personal force, i.e. God would have had to bring the universe into being. There is no other sensible, logical explanation as to the universe's existance. All other arguments are riddles with holes.
I'm not arguing that the universe didn't have a beginning. Beaches have a beginning, that doesn't mean they required a conscious creator. The same is true for snowflakes (which are exceptionally complex in structure), volcanos, etc... And reality CAN have existed for an infinitely long amount of time, there are multiple theories that include omniverses coming into being like bubbles forming in a pot of boiling water. This doesn't mean they came from nothing.... -continued-
Yes, we know people create axes because we can test and observe a person creating an axe, and observe that axes are highly unlikely to form naturally.
I'm not saying homosexuality is anything, I have not studied homosexuality in regards to evolution and it is irrelevant anyway.
And like I said you would, you ignored a lot of my arguments. Good job.
Your claim that "so many atheists are homosexuals" is irrelevant to the existence of a god. It wouldn't matter if 100% of atheists were gay, you still not proven your god exists.
Here is a nice statistic for you though: Christians are more likely than atheists to divorce. You sinful devils! ;)
So please, counter every argument I have just made logically, because I'm pretty god damn sure you're going to ignore most of it, strawman my stance, or just respond in rhetoric.
@Ilikemustard Would you say homosexuality is the product of evolution? Wouldn't that eventually result in the destruction of a species if they stopped reproducing heterosexually?
@savedbyjesusblood I wouldnt say homosexuality would lead to the destruction of the species, there is the possibility of all humans evolving into a species of humans similar to an hermaphrodite having both male and female sexual organs also being capable of changing our sex depending on the enviroment and availability of other sexual partners etc etc, clownfish for example. Pick up a science book instead of a bible next time please. Sacrificing goats is the way to go.
@AgnosticPath I see that Richard Dawkins has fried your brain. Homosexuality is against nature. Only a man and a woman can make a child. This is sad that so many people want to dance around the streets and celebrate something which is seriously wrong. God can deliver all of them, but it seems they would rather enjoy a short sinful lifestyle than receive the gospel and be eternally saved.
@savedbyjesusblood I see that kent hovind has twisted your mind, homosexuality isnt against nature, it exists and has so longer than your religion (which was stolen from egyptian mythology anyway). I'm happy that those people can stand up against disgusting middle eastern/african religous fundamentalists such as yourself. And it was the egyptian sun god horus that raised the dead and walked on water not jebus.
@AgnosticPath , there is in fact a reasonable argument to the effect that people having heterosexual sex and breeding uncontrollably will eventually lead to the destruction of the species. Unless man can find the technology and another planet to immigrate to, which I doubt....
Just as the bubbles forming in boiling water do not come from nothing, they are just changing states.
This is beside the point though, I am not an astrophysicist. The point is there is no more evidence for an intelligent creator of the universe than there is for snowflake fairies that create snowflakes. And you COMPLETELY ignored my argument about SPECIFIC creators. Why was THOR not the creator? Why not ALLAH? -continued-
@AgnosticPath You can give all the proof in the world, likemustard would still not want to believe. Jesus raised the dead and people still wouldn't believe. It's part of the sin nature. People either accept the gospel of Christ crucified or they reject it completely.
Laughing my head off reading these comments "pooftar", "fag" hahahahaha!
creativenaz 3 weeks ago
@MrCohibaboy that's what hitler said, and that's what hitler tried to do. You have the moral conscience of a psychopathic dicator and yet still I would never persecute you, let alone "remove you from this earth."
lilteenyweenytuna 1 month ago
Australia is a neanderthal joke. One of their icons is near death, and all they can comment on his sexuality, or deride homosexuality. Maybe it's because u are full of Irish convicts and wog immigrants that means u are still in the dark ages
oldwight 1 month ago
@MrCohibaboy, your descrimination and ignorance is simply astounding.
I hope you get some compassion and education knocked into you so that you will awaken and understand that being LGBT is not a fucking sickness.
lilteenyweenytuna 2 months ago
@lilteenyweenytuna its a sickness all gays need to be removed from earth
MrCohibaboy 1 month ago
fucking poofter , hope the fall knocked some sense back into that skull , and maybe just maybe he will awaken and understand the being a poofter is a sickness.
MrCohibaboy 2 months ago
@MrCohibaboy , you are a fucking nazi
oldwight 1 month ago
@oldwight lol fuck you fag
MrCohibaboy 1 month ago
@MrCohibaboy , no thanks, not interested
oldwight 1 month ago
@oldwight fuck off you poofter
MrCohibaboy 1 month ago
@MrCohibaboy , you wouldn't have the guts to say that to my face, nazi
oldwight 1 month ago
@oldwight i think i would have the guts
MrCohibaboy 1 month ago
@MrCohibaboy , oh i think not. In any event, you are a joke, bigots like you have become an ever smaller crazed minority spewing hatred, it would be laughable were it not so sad
oldwight 1 month ago
:] :|
laurence265 2 months ago
@noirkitten , sounds like you are doing a delicious bit of stereotyping about gay men yourselves. News flash, a gay bay is just that, if you don't like gays, why go there?
oldwight 2 months ago
Hey, Molly, I have only great respect for you for your very brave and very inspiring admission. I am gay, too.
rickcoram1 5 months ago
Molly is awesome. I've bumped into him on many dance floors at parties over the years and he is always happy to chat to random people for ages. Really great guy...and he has a hot boyfriend too.
MultiSchnizzle 6 months ago
@MultiSchnizzle He's great, he'll give you the time of day
MrShearz25 5 months ago
Molly Meldrum is gay?! Fuck yeah!
JayForddd 8 months ago
I had no idea that Molly was gay. I'm all for gay marriage and I believe they are no different to us so why should they be excluded?
TheJayg13 10 months ago
ty molly
varietychairsnake 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@noirkitten I think you will find 'bitch' and 'cunt' are commonly used through out Australia, not just in Gay bars, in fact, I now live in Canada, and 80 percent of my mates are in fact straight Australians, both male and female, and we all used these two words day in and day out..as for the term 'Rice Queens' and 'Old queen'..we openly use these terms in our community as tongue and cheek along with words like twinks and Queer to name a couple..
shanmin80 1 year ago
@noirkitten I think you will find 'bitch' and 'cunt' are commonly used through out Australia, not just in Gay bars, in fact, I now live in Canada, and 80 percent of my mates are in fact straight Australians, both male and female, and we all used these two words day in and day out..as for the term 'Rice Queens' and 'Old queen'..we openly use these terms in our community as tongue and cheek along with words like twinks and Queer to name a couple..
shanmin80 1 year ago
@noirkitten I think you will find 'bitch' and 'cunt' are commonly used through out Australia, not just in Gay bars, in fact, I now live in Canada, and 80 percent of my mates are in fact straight Australians, both male and female, and we all used these two words day in and day out..as for the term 'Rice Queens' and 'Old queen'..we openly use these terms in our community as tongue and cheek along with words like twinks and Queer to name a couple..
shanmin80 1 year ago
take off your fucking hat, stupid asshole
Xezatt 1 year ago
AFTER 45 YEARS IN THE INDUSTRY- MOLLY HAS JUST COME OUT.
(SO PUT THAT DOWN TO DATE OF RELEASE,POSITION & DURATION.)
small detail is that no-one gets pay.t.v anymore now free to air digital offers the lot.
so watching mardigras WONT get that million plus rating hitch.
AlburyAustralia 1 year ago
i didnt know that but for fuck sakes whats wrong with gays !!!!
accadaccaboy 1 year ago
old dirty homo
pugghead 1 year ago
i didnt know he was gay?
cryymorepl3ase 1 year ago
is molly meldrum actually homosexual?
pillyslater 1 year ago
FAG!!!
eth27 1 year ago
I am proud to be straight, but for some reason having a straight parade or a straight party or a straight bar is 'discrimination'. What a bloody joke.
TheNimbusMan 1 year ago
@TheNimbusMan straight people aren't kicked out of home for being straight, beaten up at pubs or in dark alleys for being straight, disciminated at by the law and the government for being straight, forced into the closet or told to lie about their sexuality for being straight....you see the difference?
oldwight 2 months ago
molly is gay?!
thatginnyisamidget 1 year ago
Molly, the blood of Jesus can save you. He was crucified for the sins of the world. He knocks at the door. Don't keep that door shut.
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
Sigh, not you too.... FAGGOT!
arrowfluxx 1 year ago
fag
sukka113 1 year ago
Molly Meldrum gay?! omg thats soo cute!!
teagzxo 1 year ago
@teagzxo Molly needs to get saved.
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
i ain't gay and i don't judge but i have problem with the clothing people wear at mardi gra. i say keep it indoors
excop360 1 year ago
God made Adam & Eve. Not Adam & Steve.
mrthisbeflute 1 year ago
@mrthisbeflute Would you fuck off! You don't like it fine fuck off go elsewhere you idiotic bigot!
rednogo 1 year ago
@rednogo yeh i'm not a bigot I have gay friends actually, but I still don't agree with it. I just don't think laws should permit the practice of gay marriage, simply because it isn't natural. Can you say that it is natural?
mrthisbeflute 1 year ago
@mrthisbeflute Love is the most natural thing for any human being. So yes it is natural for two people to love each other and want to get married and there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. As for having gay friends well you couldn't be much of a friend if you believe them to be unnatural.
I don't understand people like you who feel the need to watch every video in regard to a subject that you don't believe is unnatural and make the same comment.
rednogo 1 year ago
@mrthisbeflute , you have gay friends and yet you think they're unnatural? Some friend you are. BIGOT.
oldwight 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mrthisbeflute
God doesn't exist moron.
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
You're looking great Molly...Love You :)
ChannelsNotAvailable 1 year ago
what you mean to say is you are not ashamed to put your old fella in another mans butt,,,,,,you sick fucker
007cambon 1 year ago
If the Son sets you free, you are free indeed. You don't have to be gay Molly. Jesus can set you free.
Jesus delivers people from sin. He is the Saviour of the world.
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
@savedbyjesusblood
Jesus was on crack and god doesn't exist. Fuck off, asshole.
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
@Ilikemustard Jesus said if the people of Sodom had seen his miracles, they would have repented. This generation seems to be hard of heart, just like the Isralites were in Jesus's day.
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
@savedbyjesusblood
It is not possible to prove god's existence if you define god as omnipotent. Omnipotence defies logic, and an omnipotent being cannot logically exist, and this is easily proved due to the fact that an omnipotent being cannot create and control another omnipotent being. Don't tell me god exists "outside logic", if he does that means he is untestable in which case YOU do not have any evidence of his existence and therefore your belief is unfounded.
Once again, fuck off.
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
@Ilikemustard God has already proven his existance. The Heavens and the Earth declare the works of His hands. It has nothing to do with being "oustide logic". That is an atheistic red herring. People deny the reality of God so they can falsely believe they can be their own God, decide what is wrong and right for themselves. This is why so many atheists are homosexuals. God could easily free them from this bondage but they would rather live in darkness than come to a knowledge of the light.
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
The existence of earth is no more evidence of the christian god than it is of the flying spaghetti monster you dolt. This is based on the tired old "we know a painting had a painter, therefore we know the universe had a creator" argument, right? No, this is stupid. We know a painting had a painter because we have seen a painting being painted before. If I locked a man in a cage from birth, so that he never sees the outside world, he cannot deduce that a painting requires a painter. -continued-
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
It is the same with the universe, we did not witness the creation of a universe, therefore we cannot deduce that it required a creator.
And this all ignores the fact that even if the universe was evidence of a creator, it is not evidence of YOUR god. Why is it no evidence of Allah, or Zeus, or Thor?
Being "outside logic" is not an atheistic red herring, it is an argument that was made by other christians. You did not address my argument about an omnipotent god being illogical. -continued-
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
So what is your counter to my claim that an omnipotent being is ILLOGICAL? It cannot exist in our reality due to the multiple paradoxes of omnipotence.
I do not deny the reality of god so that I can "be my own god". That is a blatant fucking strawman, do not tell me what my own stance is. I don't believe in god because of the lack of evidence. I don't believe in santa, unicorns or leprechauns for the same reason. -continued-
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
@Ilikemustard There is a major flaw in your inference that the creation did not requirea creator. First, the universe can not be infinitely old, as an infinite time must have passed to reach the present, also, accorinding to the universe's own laws, and infinitely old universe would have burnt itself out an infinite time ago. So the universe had a beginning. Now, the universe was either brought in being by a personal or impersonal cause. Cont'
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
@savedbyjesusblood The impersonal cause, with on intelligence or attributes pertaining within, can not be responsible for a universe of order. Just like creating an ax head, an outside force, this case a person would have been the personal force responsible for shaping the stone to an axe. So a personal force, i.e. God would have had to bring the universe into being. There is no other sensible, logical explanation as to the universe's existance. All other arguments are riddles with holes.
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
I'm not arguing that the universe didn't have a beginning. Beaches have a beginning, that doesn't mean they required a conscious creator. The same is true for snowflakes (which are exceptionally complex in structure), volcanos, etc... And reality CAN have existed for an infinitely long amount of time, there are multiple theories that include omniverses coming into being like bubbles forming in a pot of boiling water. This doesn't mean they came from nothing.... -continued-
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
-continued-
Yes, we know people create axes because we can test and observe a person creating an axe, and observe that axes are highly unlikely to form naturally.
I'm not saying homosexuality is anything, I have not studied homosexuality in regards to evolution and it is irrelevant anyway.
And like I said you would, you ignored a lot of my arguments. Good job.
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
-continued-
Your claim that "so many atheists are homosexuals" is irrelevant to the existence of a god. It wouldn't matter if 100% of atheists were gay, you still not proven your god exists.
Here is a nice statistic for you though: Christians are more likely than atheists to divorce. You sinful devils! ;)
So please, counter every argument I have just made logically, because I'm pretty god damn sure you're going to ignore most of it, strawman my stance, or just respond in rhetoric.
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
@Ilikemustard Would you say homosexuality is the product of evolution? Wouldn't that eventually result in the destruction of a species if they stopped reproducing heterosexually?
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
@savedbyjesusblood I wouldnt say homosexuality would lead to the destruction of the species, there is the possibility of all humans evolving into a species of humans similar to an hermaphrodite having both male and female sexual organs also being capable of changing our sex depending on the enviroment and availability of other sexual partners etc etc, clownfish for example. Pick up a science book instead of a bible next time please. Sacrificing goats is the way to go.
AgnosticPath 1 year ago
@AgnosticPath I see that Richard Dawkins has fried your brain. Homosexuality is against nature. Only a man and a woman can make a child. This is sad that so many people want to dance around the streets and celebrate something which is seriously wrong. God can deliver all of them, but it seems they would rather enjoy a short sinful lifestyle than receive the gospel and be eternally saved.
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
@savedbyjesusblood I see that kent hovind has twisted your mind, homosexuality isnt against nature, it exists and has so longer than your religion (which was stolen from egyptian mythology anyway). I'm happy that those people can stand up against disgusting middle eastern/african religous fundamentalists such as yourself. And it was the egyptian sun god horus that raised the dead and walked on water not jebus.
AgnosticPath 1 year ago
@AgnosticPath , there is in fact a reasonable argument to the effect that people having heterosexual sex and breeding uncontrollably will eventually lead to the destruction of the species. Unless man can find the technology and another planet to immigrate to, which I doubt....
oldwight 2 months ago
@oldwight ever heard of contraception?
ChristRegeneration 1 month ago
@ChristRegeneration , yeah and I wish Mr Cohibaboy's parents, and any bible bashers' parents, had thought of it.
oldwight 1 month ago
Just as the bubbles forming in boiling water do not come from nothing, they are just changing states.
This is beside the point though, I am not an astrophysicist. The point is there is no more evidence for an intelligent creator of the universe than there is for snowflake fairies that create snowflakes. And you COMPLETELY ignored my argument about SPECIFIC creators. Why was THOR not the creator? Why not ALLAH? -continued-
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
@Ilikemustard I think the fact that your asking for proof of his particular god evades him. Good luck with this circular argument I can see a brewn.
AgnosticPath 1 year ago
@AgnosticPath
It's the same old crap. "Nature is proof of god, DERP!"
Ilikemustard 1 year ago
@AgnosticPath You can give all the proof in the world, likemustard would still not want to believe. Jesus raised the dead and people still wouldn't believe. It's part of the sin nature. People either accept the gospel of Christ crucified or they reject it completely.
savedbyjesusblood 1 year ago
Bless you Molly and all that sail in you:) I may in in the Same Same Sydney chat rooms a lot.
badamj2000 1 year ago