UK snooker championship semi-final interrupted by overhead vents!

[tomreves28]

anyways, hope someday this whole scam will be revealed and the people responsible of convering Higgins ass will be brought to justice

[rvpnumb]

@tomreves28 I hope so aswell, used to be his fan but this was to much,I can no longer enjoy his victorys or his game, I have seen some bad shit from O´Sullivan during the years but nothing like this thats why I still support the man.

[tomreves28]

@tomreves28 It is such a disgrace that he was allowed to play and win world championship.

[tomreves28]

the cheater is smiling

[theshrews123]

@tomreves28 actually proved by an independent tribunal that he was innocent

[tomreves28]

@theshrews123 - Yeah yeah, that tribunal thinks snooker fans are fools, we saw video we Higgins was kinda freely agreeing to fix matches, and was even considering how to swallow those money he was supposed to get. Higgins wont fool us, DEPENDENT tribunal wont fool us.

[tomreves28]

@theshrews123 you must be joking?? do you sincerely believe in that???

[theshrews123]

@tomreves28 i don't believe people should be heckling the guy over it, especially after the guys dad died recently

[tomreves28]

@theshrews123 - the heckler wasnt shouting anything about his dad, why wouldnt fans cant express anger at such unjustice

[tomreves28]

@tomreves28 *injustice

[theshrews123]

@tomreves28 i understand what your saying, but at the time, a little insenstive, he didn't even accept any money

[tomreves28]

@theshrews123 Quentin Hann also didnt accept any money when he was caught in 2006, he didnt even had any final agreement about the match-fixing, but he was banned for 8 years for that. Higgins was discussing in the video how to lauder the money. This shows his intent to accept those money. dont know what kind of monkey trial was considering his case

[TCPHumanist]

@tomreves28 Hann was banned because it was judged that he had actually intended to take part in match-fixing. Higgins was judged not to have intended to do so, only pretending to for fear of the consequences if he didn't. Guilty of not reporting attempted match-fixing, but not guilty of intended (or actual) match-fixing himself. Since no-one outside of the so-called "monkey trial" has actually seen the full evidence, how on earth can anyone claim to know that he's a cheater? Makes no sense.

[tomreves28]

@TCPHumanist Interesting how Higgins managed to fool everybody with his stupid story.

ok, let's suppose he was pretending so how could you explain the banning of Mooney from snooker for life, if Higgins' story is real, the two of them were afraid of the consequences, but somehow Mooney received much of the criticism for PRETENDING. I dont believe Mooney would risk bringing Higgins to Kiyev if he knew there is a chance he will disagree. I dont need any more evidence, because his guilt is evident