As the ONLY country to use a weapon of mass destruction on another country, the US has NO right to tell other countries they can't have them. That is like a parent telling their teenage son not to have sex... then barebacking a $5 prostitute.
Despicable. To sit with massive Arsenals of these weapons and expect others to stop and leave you with yours. Other nations dont feel safe because we are aggressive. Its not complicated.
All this is, is a sneaky maneuvre. 40 years of politics in my life you see the same circle and cycle of bullshit and underhanded actions and despicable motives. It is exactly about singling out individual nations. Thats why they say its not about that. If these liars say its black you can believe its white.
Why did the UN not help the people in palestine for 63 years. Ban Ki Mon and his crew in the UN are obliged to help the palestinian land because palestine is a member of the UN. Free the Palestine Land. UN G20 G8 !!!!
No matter how many sanctions and policies the UN establish, the dominant countries (USA) will deficit on this agreement, yet you would be stupid not to. Hegemonic Stability Theory explains that the usa wants another state to disarm their nuclear weapons program, but not themselves. Just google Hegemonic Stability Theory for more, it will explain that the international system is at fault for this
My opinion! Iran and Nord Korea are placed for injustice with these sanctions Big protest I recomend changing in FN four more Nations as a permanent members of security council IRAN LYBIA SYRIEN BRAZIL.,,,,,,I´m not surprised that East Timor showed op art the last second and was chosen instead of Iran in a department within FN.An old APPROACH.,,,,,mar kjartansson 24t blog Mingler.dk
I support ALL the countries of the world to have A-Bombs and H-Bombs. The problem is when you have a son of a bitch who has the bomb and refuses to get rid of it, and a lot of countries that have dont have, while there is no international organization with credibility to regulate it and prevent a motherfucker to use the weapons. The US invasion against Iraq and future war in Iran and Venezuela, show perfectly that no country can rely on the UN i to survive.
I think it's unrealistic. If you could get rid of every nuke the first country to build them again would have a monopoly on them. It's like banning guns then thinking the criminals will turn in their weapons.
If we take back all advance weapons from Israel, Iranians will declare wars with their naming god government regime and renew it to reflect them across broad. Now, it is some Middle East conflict profiteer from us in our government who don't want it to happen. Try send troops to Israel and collecting all those advance weapons back to U. S. and you'll see direct regime dismantle in Iran in a blink.
Way to go UN! A resolution like this is good but with one caveat; nukes and nuclear reactors should be allowed in deep space (far away from earth so there's no risk of nuclear fallout) for the purpose of peaceful exploration.
The highly enriched uranium left over from the disassembled warheads can and already is being depleted and used in nuclear reactors here on earth.
Additionally plasma rockets achieve excellent price/weight ratio for transporting payload in space but they require a lot of power to operate, something nuclear reactors are known to offer.
Ouch... paranoid vaccination crankery on top of fundamentalist religious lunacy in one person. Cranky beliefs often appear in clusters probably because their origin is the same; lack of intelligence and critical thinking skills.
The main reason the NPT had limited success is that it allows these five permanent security council members to keep their pile of nukes but says others not to. This is ridiculous. These five nations should start talking of their own cuts in a clear terms of numbers and deadlines...and then ask others too. But they won't do it. So, we will continue to see it growing all over as the countries associate it with their pride as well as few of them also have genuine reasons to keep it.
Great Way to go Obama.. the great talker wins language by the UN who is also "just talk"!
So if someone creates nukes, the UN will get to condemn... then if really upset "strongly condemn".
In the meantime Obama will continue to kiss Russia and Iran's ass while they continue to do whatever they like with our full support and wagging finger!
As the ONLY country to use a weapon of mass destruction on another country, the US has NO right to tell other countries they can't have them. That is like a parent telling their teenage son not to have sex... then barebacking a $5 prostitute.
MatthewRider1 4 weeks ago
Despicable. To sit with massive Arsenals of these weapons and expect others to stop and leave you with yours. Other nations dont feel safe because we are aggressive. Its not complicated.
All this is, is a sneaky maneuvre. 40 years of politics in my life you see the same circle and cycle of bullshit and underhanded actions and despicable motives. It is exactly about singling out individual nations. Thats why they say its not about that. If these liars say its black you can believe its white.
outofslumber 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why did the UN not help the people in palestine for 63 years. Ban Ki Mon and his crew in the UN are obliged to help the palestinian land because palestine is a member of the UN. Free the Palestine Land. UN G20 G8 !!!!
News107 8 months ago
No More Veto
We are fighting for a democratic UN, without permanent members in the Security Council or veto their rights!
Make the world better and join us at Facebook, Youtube and sign our petition!
NoMoreVeto 8 months ago
The security council does absolutely nothing but condemn Israel. Thats all they do, and it does nothing. Why are we wasting our money on this crap.
shinokiba 8 months ago
FATAH IS PALESTINE AND PALESTINE IS HAMAS.
Palestine is Islam.
Palestine is Al Quds.
News107 9 months ago
No matter how many sanctions and policies the UN establish, the dominant countries (USA) will deficit on this agreement, yet you would be stupid not to. Hegemonic Stability Theory explains that the usa wants another state to disarm their nuclear weapons program, but not themselves. Just google Hegemonic Stability Theory for more, it will explain that the international system is at fault for this
MrMarcus09 9 months ago
this is against the constitution for him to be in this coucil
ralcaraz81 10 months ago
zionism must be wiped out!
mikefan09 10 months ago
disarm libya! then disarm yourselves!
mikefan09 10 months ago
nukes will never go away. protests are useless and won't accomplish anything.
0neofthem 1 year ago
My opinion! Iran and Nord Korea are placed for injustice with these sanctions Big protest I recomend changing in FN four more Nations as a permanent members of security council IRAN LYBIA SYRIEN BRAZIL.,,,,,,I´m not surprised that East Timor showed op art the last second and was chosen instead of Iran in a department within FN.An old APPROACH.,,,,,mar kjartansson 24t blog Mingler.dk
markjartansson 1 year ago
I support ALL the countries of the world to have A-Bombs and H-Bombs. The problem is when you have a son of a bitch who has the bomb and refuses to get rid of it, and a lot of countries that have dont have, while there is no international organization with credibility to regulate it and prevent a motherfucker to use the weapons. The US invasion against Iraq and future war in Iran and Venezuela, show perfectly that no country can rely on the UN i to survive.
apresesco 1 year ago
I think it's unrealistic. If you could get rid of every nuke the first country to build them again would have a monopoly on them. It's like banning guns then thinking the criminals will turn in their weapons.
TheMobocracy 1 year ago
This is unconstitutional/illegal for Obama to be on this council.
Johnnytheowl 2 years ago
@Johnnytheowl No, no. Check the rules of procedure at article 13.
Extricate 2 years ago
is this not illegal in article 1 section 9 ?>?????
alanmgandy 2 years ago
The US, Israel, the UK and France MUST destroy their nuclear weapons. And then we can talk about other nations. Fucking hypocrites.
Metsada007 2 years ago 12
@Metsada007 I agree, but that will not happen. The UN is not a democracy.
WorldAgainstUSA 1 year ago
@Metsada007 on this particular point I can only agree
charlotte946 11 months ago
@charlotte946
Thank you very much. If we want peace we must be consistent and sincere. All of us :)
Metsada007 11 months ago
Where is Israel? O yeah they don't have to sign anything. Zionism will fuck you all.
bohemiangrove 2 years ago 4
Violations and usurpation of American sovereignty.
This is a black day for America.
chewbaca1989 2 years ago
If we take back all advance weapons from Israel, Iranians will declare wars with their naming god government regime and renew it to reflect them across broad. Now, it is some Middle East conflict profiteer from us in our government who don't want it to happen. Try send troops to Israel and collecting all those advance weapons back to U. S. and you'll see direct regime dismantle in Iran in a blink.
beancube2008 2 years ago
Way to go UN! A resolution like this is good but with one caveat; nukes and nuclear reactors should be allowed in deep space (far away from earth so there's no risk of nuclear fallout) for the purpose of peaceful exploration.
The highly enriched uranium left over from the disassembled warheads can and already is being depleted and used in nuclear reactors here on earth.
Jacnas 2 years ago
why do we need nuclear reactors for exploration in deep space? sounds like a colossal waste of money to me
solfegg 2 years ago
Google 'conceptual mars mission plasma rockets'.
Additionally plasma rockets achieve excellent price/weight ratio for transporting payload in space but they require a lot of power to operate, something nuclear reactors are known to offer.
Jacnas 2 years ago
Barack Obama is the last and worst evil tyrant this world will ever see....the death!
Starts next month with the deadly H1N1 vaccine. There will be blood and suffering everywhere, as bad as there has never been before.
SuperboyXX0018 2 years ago
Ouch... paranoid vaccination crankery on top of fundamentalist religious lunacy in one person. Cranky beliefs often appear in clusters probably because their origin is the same; lack of intelligence and critical thinking skills.
Jacnas 2 years ago
You'll think otherwise in a very short time.....
SuperboyXX0018 2 years ago
The main reason the NPT had limited success is that it allows these five permanent security council members to keep their pile of nukes but says others not to. This is ridiculous. These five nations should start talking of their own cuts in a clear terms of numbers and deadlines...and then ask others too. But they won't do it. So, we will continue to see it growing all over as the countries associate it with their pride as well as few of them also have genuine reasons to keep it.
chandraiitk 2 years ago
They're lieing,the powers try to make a cause to kill Iran and North Korea.They never give up their nuke bombs.The devils!
68130436 2 years ago
Great Way to go Obama.. the great talker wins language by the UN who is also "just talk"!
So if someone creates nukes, the UN will get to condemn... then if really upset "strongly condemn".
In the meantime Obama will continue to kiss Russia and Iran's ass while they continue to do whatever they like with our full support and wagging finger!
jabberwolf 2 years ago
Will this Treaty apply to Israel? Because I have a feeling that it will apply to all including Iran except Israel at the end, lol!
cat22203 2 years ago
WEAAAAPOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONZ
Jpcristel 2 years ago