@alfonsothewhite Well, For the majority of atheist I understand that the reason you dont believe is because you dont see the proof for it. And, as a christian I fully understand that and honsestly see that point of view. But my main question is why not give it a shot or if you have why not stick with it ? Im not talking about going to church, tithes, etc etc, but just seeking a personal relationship and seeing if you dont feel God or find that proof?
Mincaye Enquedi murdered American missionaries in his native Ecuador in the 1950's. He converted to Christianity, developed a deep love for the families of the missionaries he killed, and has been a preacher for several decades. This is documented in the film "End of the Spear." If Christianity is a hoax, it is the most life-transforming "hoax" ever devised.
I came across this trying to find "Ask An Atheist", a show I like. Tom you are a pitiful atheist, your show is pitiful, and you are a pitiful human being. I'm surprised you didn't call her a dumb woman and tell her to get in the kitchen.
@CamillaCalamity You let your emotions get in the way of critical thinking. You don't have to like everything he says, but that doesn't mean it isn't the truth.
@CamillaCalamity You let your emotions get in the way of critical thinking. You don't have to like everything he says, but that doesn't mean it isn't the truth.
@CamillaCalamity You let your emotions get in the way of critical thinking. You don't have to like everything he says, but that doesn't mean it isn't the truth.
So you're delusional if you talk about something that you can't prove exists? erm no... but otherwise I almost completely agree with everything Tom is saying.
if there was a god he wouldnt produce these mindless sheep that believe ANYTHING that is broadcast on tv, sylvia browne is one of the most evil people on earth
I have a few questions for an atheist if anyone would care to responed. I am a christian and the study of why atheist believe in what they do fascinates me for some reason.
@bowenj10 Well, not so much what I think you all believe but all science, church talk and theology aside. Out of every bit of knowledge that is in the world, every book, every fact, every literal word of knowledge...what percentage of that knowledge do you think that a typical college graduate common sense person would have?
@bowenj10 Exactly how I see it. So couldnt it be logical to assume that God could exist inside of that percentage of knowledge that we do not know? Im not trying to do one of these stupid trick you christian questions though it does fit into that catagory, its not im intentions. I just cant understand why it seems so improbable for atheist to look into the possibility when, if its true, so much is at stake.
@KesslersCross No, it's not logical. Religious gods are supernatural beings. If scientists proved the existence of supernatural beings, then they would not, by definition, be supernatural beings. Otherwise, all claims of existence of supernatural beings are no better (or worse) than the claim that a flying pink unicorn is standing right next to you right now.
@bowenj10 Also, the idea of an atheist professing faith in something that he doesn't actually believe in has a name: Pascal's Wager. Pascal's Wager is a ridiculous idea for the following reason: if God is supposedly an omniscient being, then "he" would know that a person who is claiming to believe but who doesn't actually believe is in fact lying (otherwise, God is not omniscient).
@bowenj10 It's actually ridiculous because another "Wager" can be built that has the same ethical and logical value of Pascal's one, thus making it actually NOT the most intelligent "bet" a rational human could make (the Atheist's Wager).
@bowenj10 Maybe, but what if God exists on a level of knowledge that we do not understand yet.What if he is some other deminsional being or something. I undersatnd what your saying and from your perspective would totally agree.Now, something that few people hear. What if there was a way to prove God?What if there was a path so to speak where there was a confirmation. I dont mean though arguments, scientific debates etc but a way for you personally to know,would you look into it then?
@KesslersCross That doesn't make sense. Your trying to play the ignorant card in order to try to seem like it's more likely that any crazy idea you come up with is more likely.
Your also assuming atheists haven't considered religion. I bet you more atheists have considered religion more than any group of believers. Believers are the ones who don't consider that they could be wrong. Do you ask yourself what if Allah is right or Zeus or thousands of other religions? Aren't you afraid?
@RuinSonic 1. Lol, dude your looking way to deep into my question, I have no tricks up my sleeve. Sure it makes sense. All throughout the bible knowledge is a key word used all the time. And, I agree. I have found many atheist know the bible better than a lot of christians do. Thats why I like a lot of atheist because many are not so much against it, they just dont see the evidence and have questions. I preach, and unlike many preachers, I challange the people to ask themselves if they truly
@RuinSonic 2. believe. Many were raised in it, taught to never question. The way I see it, to truly believe without doubt is when the words in the Bible are received, then applied, and a person can then see the results.Thats all most honest atheist want is proof. Church folks now are terrified to make God real in their lives when it is written to try the spirits.The bible details many things that a believer should be able to do and cant because they dont truly have faith anymore.
@KesslersCross "any were raised in it, taught to never question."
Great I hope you ask everyone in your congregation to seriously consider and understand evolution and the arguments against the Bible before debating about it. It would sure make my life easier.
"a person can then see the results"
And when I was a Christian I didn't see results and what people claimed as results were pretty easily explainable by natural happenstance and psychology.
@RuinSonic I really dont go into evolution that much. I know just by talking to some of my congragation that some believe in evolution and some dont but I dont feel the need to go into it. Im only an amature scientist like many that debate that cause. Exactly, many do not see it and to me that is where it begins becuase I didnt either once I started questioning it. I think though that science can explain many if not all "micicles"
That was your first mistake thinking that science will tell us all the answers. In fact many atheists have argued that Science will probably never give us the answer to why the universe exists and how we should live our lives. That's where I have a problem. I think the universe is miraculously wonderful but I'm not for solving a mystery with a mystery. As far as I know nothing has indicated that our minds our independent of matter. Why should I consider God as plausible?
@RuinSonic I didnt know that and I think that was a very good statement. From my point of view, I see it that what can be or will be answered in science is simply an answer to how God did it.You and atheist though dont attribute a scientific answer to a God and I dont know why that offends some christians.So either way science is still the key to the same answer.Regardless of the who or what was behind it, the answer is still the answer.Why not consider him as plausible?
@KesslersCross "I see it that what can be or will be answered in science is simply an answer to how God did it."
But then why claim there is a God if science could explain it? Or why not say God is just the energy and the reason for existence?
"Why not consider him as plausible?"
First off I honestly don't know. The closer you get to a personal God found in a religion the more implausible the idea is to me. The simple answer is God just adds more inexplicability to the inexplicable problem.
@KesslersCross Of course I wouldn't believe anything with any amount of confidence if I didn't have strong evidence for it. If it could be shown that God is necessary and there was evidence of immaterial objects or if God starts becoming a strongly predictable theory, then it's likely I'd be convinced.
God gives epistemic comfort to some, but there is no verification or explanation for the idea to give me any confidence that in the lack of knowledge of the universe we can conclude on God.
@KesslersCross "So couldnt it be logical to assume that God could exist inside of that percentage of knowledge that we do not know?" I know Bowen has answered this, but I'd like to take a crack also. Setting aside logic, sure, it's possible something could exist. Okay, evidence? Christians are always claiming that they KNOW god exists, but not a single shred of hard evidence has been offered.. I've studied and thought about this a great deal--and no convincing argument has ever been put forward.
@KesslersCross Theres a pretty simple premise to atheism that religious people will NEVER understand. It is the fact that WE DO NOT KNOW if there is a god so we don't say we believe there is. There is no evidence to support the idea of religious gods anywhere in nature, logic, or science... YET. And until we find a supernatural being that claims and proves itself as master architect of reality, we will not act as if there is. Look at the history of any religion, what good did it do for humanity?
@KesslersCross Atheism is not a belief in anything. It is the position that there is no evidence to support a belief in a god. That is it. There is nothing more.
@donepearce By definition sure, I agree. But your statement does not fit the majority according to their actions. Most take a firm stand against any reasoning, any logic, any evidence simply for the the cause to do so and nothing more. Its the same with Christians though, most do not fit what is supposed to be the guidelines of the definition. So, the factor of human nature using a shield for their personal wants and beliefs comes into play.
@KesslersCross - Why don't you start out by, 1st, proving a god exists,then we can go on from there. But you have no proof of such a being, Atheist make no such claim, however Christians and people of "faith" do make such a claim...so where's the beef? Until proof can be provided, there remains NO GOOD REASON to believe in any gods, devils, ghosts, supernatural beings, none of them.
@KesslersCross Why do we believe what we do? We are not in the position to be supporting our beliefs for we have none, in a sense, that is.We have been shown no evidence for a god and, as such, don't believe in one. We are making no unsupported claims so the burden of proof is not on us. The burden of proof would be on you or outwardly religious people to support their claim that there is a god. Likewise, if I said there was a small teapot orbiting the earth, you would need proof to believe it.
Athiests dont believe in anything resembling a deity.
In fact, the Atheists I know put their stock in logic and reason and not anything resembling a belief system.
Actually, Im a Deist and therefore never make value judgement on Athiests since the ones I know are often better people than religious people I have met and known.
Most religious people are hypocrites anyway-they pick and choose their ideology.
Lol at another clip in which said Tom said that you don't deserve respect --- you earn it. And yet here, he says that he is losing respect for the caller by the moment, despite her having done nothing to earn it.
And lol at the caller, who keeps on insisting that she "knows it". And when she's shot down, she says she "believes it".
@republicanpatriot100 he's coming back on air next year....so that means God wanted him back right?......please don't make us look bad religion is suppose to make us loving of people and forgiving not spiteful and hateful.Besides some of these people who call in really have stupid reasons for believing and besides belief is just that belief isn't I know it's I think.The moment they start trying to prove that they know.....it's a damn shame
Ok, you have the name republican patriot, believe in god, & think brown is something other than an idiotic waste of skin who exploits peoples emotions by doing cold reading [badly]. Are you a tea partier who watches beck, also? You have the IQ for it.
Sylvia Browne? Fuck, who could give her any credit anymore? All one needs to do is look at the wikipage and check the references and see that she is full of shit and fails every attempt at anything psychic.
Sorry for misspellings. Btw. why should we "keep in mind" anything "from a woman's point of view"? There is not woman's or men's point of view on the definition of atheist! You don't get it! And btw, guys, we don't get either! Stop arguing with women! They'll never get it! They don't want to. All they're pseudo-intellectual blather melts away for them when you give them a warm smile, a kiss and a hard cock. That's all they really want anyway. Civilization could crumble as longasthey feel special
we tend to invent things, create art, architecture, civilizations, etc., and not spend our lives worrying whether Brad likes us or Janine's a bitch. That's too draining; a job for worrywarts, followers and the immature-heterosexual women and most men, too. Keep up, the intellectual inquiry, though, Arielle, although I don't think you'll find it amenable. Most women don't. It makes them feel unwomanly.
"Today I'm a punk. Today I'm a opera fan. Today I'm an atheist." She'd probably marry Hitler if he treated her nice and got along with her friends. Arielle, I know what you're saying 'cuz I'm a secular Jewish male and many of us are atheist, liberal Democrats, Obama supporters, etc. but not all. Atheism is lack of theism plain and simple. Dig a bit deeper 'cuz we men tend to take words at face value, we're not interpreting the miasma of emotion behind it. We speak a common language whcih is why
Also, according to her logic she must be a racist. I quote- "generalizing 'is' racist." She is generalizing atheist as wonderful, fair-minded pdople who don't, or are less prone, to hate. You tried to tell her it's not a belief system, merely the lack of a belief in god(s). She probably thinks we're all liberal Democrat, vegan, hippies who recycles and like craft beer. Like many women, she probably thinks wearing the garb of a certain sub-culture makes her a part of it.
bowenj10 and iiwatcher-well said, but you're trying to explain to a woman. A smart woman, but a woman, nonetheless and it's difficult, if not impossible, to divorce her emotions from the argument. She doesn't get it, 'cuz she's possibly and atheist for emotional reasons (some religions subordinate women) rather than metaphysical ones. She finds it hard to parse out the denotative definitions of "atheism", "racism" and "generalization" from the life situations in which they appear. Sloppy thinkin
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
As a fellow atheist, I'm ashamed of Leykis. To me, atheism regards people as equals, yet he continually degrades people he doesn't like (women). Many religions treat women as inferior, which is one of the things that drove me away from religion. Yet here this guy is, making atheism look bad. Thanks a lot, Tom.
@NintendoArielle Atheism doesn't involve taking any positions one way or another on anything. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in a deity. That's it. There's absolutely nothing more to it than that. It's simply the opposite of theism, which is the belief in a deity. As an atheist, you're certainly welcome to have your own views on whatever you want, but they're no more representative of atheism than Christianity's views are of theism. Perhaps you should crack open a book once in a while.
@bowenj10 Maybe you should've read my implied context. I know what the definition of atheism is; I was specifically referring to how Leykis disrespects half of Earth's population, much in the way many religions do. As I originally mentioned in my post, atheism was appealing to me because it does not tell women that they are inferior to men. Please pay attention to the context next time.
@NintendoArielle Why even bother mentioning atheism in the context of a discussion of respect or disrespect of women. Atheism has absolutely nothing to do with respect or disrespect of women. Tom's lack of respect for women has absolutely nothing to do with atheism. Why you think it does is beyond me.
@bowenj10 Once again, you overlook the context. I mentioned it because I'm surprised an atheist could treat women so poorly. Usually it's religion that creates that ideology, whereas atheism more egalitarian and tolerant.
@NintendoArielle You clearly don't know anything about atheism. Atheism is neither egalitarian nor tolerant nor anything else with respect to pretty much anything. One could be an atheist and also believe in raping women, eating babies, and doing anything else - other than believing in deities, of course. Again, atheism is simply the lack of belief in a deity. THAT'S IT! There's nothing more to it than that. Egalitarianism and tolerance are NOT tenets of atheism.
@bowenj10 Yes, I do know about atheism. Once again, in context, I was mentioning that there is nothing in atheism that says "treat a certain type of person as inferior." That's it. Get it?
@NintendoArielle No there isn't, but if someone makes weak points or starts to talk about something they don't know, cricular reasoning, logical fallacies or try for example to dismiss a Scientiffic Theory yet they show that they have few understanding of what they try to dismiss etc etc and so on and so forth... well, is not that we treat them as inferior, they've done all the work for us, they shot on theyr own foot... and yet Atheists are often called arrogants ... sorry but lmao
@NintendoArielle Just to make this very, very, very clear. 'Theism' is simply the belief in a deity. It doesn't matter what the deity is. Atheism, then, having the prefix 'a-', which means 'not' or 'without', attached to the word 'theism', is simply the lack of belief in a deity. That is ALL there is to each concept. Neither concept has any other tenets. A Christian can be a theist and a misogynist can be an atheist, but not all theists and atheists are Christians and misogynists. Get it?
@bowenj10 I know atheists can be misogynists (hence, Tom Leykis, a sad excuse for a man), but I am pointing out that there is nothing in atheism that asks its associators to hate other people for no reason. Get it?
@NintendoArielle And there's nothing that doesn't...god you're thick! You're incorrectly insinuating that atheism is some sort of belief system or is attached to some code of ethics. It isn't. It is merely lack of belief in a god. Leykis's views on women have nothing to do with atheism. GET IT?
@iiwatcher I never said atheism was a belief system. I said it doesn't ask people to believe something so extreme. That doesn't mean I was saying it's a "system" like Christianity. You're the thick one if you have to resort to insulting me.
Atheism doesn't ask that anyone believe anything. All it means is an absence of belief in any deity. Why are you surprised that an atheist can be a misogynist unless you think atheism is somehow counterpoised to any belief system, which would require it contain a belief system of its own? Further, he is not a misogynist. He is not speaking of all women. He says so time and again.He's speaking in general & it's true. Just bc the truth hurts doesn't mean you can dismiss it. You fucking DOLT! XD
@iiwatcher That is exactly what I'm saying. Since there is no defined set of rules, people can form their own beliefs. As for why I'm surprised an atheist can be a misogynist, I know it's possible, but I think it's much less likely. And regardless of what you say (keep in mind that as a woman, I view him differently), he *is* a misogynist. Isn't someone still a racist if they "speak of black people in general"?
I'd appreciate it if you didn't call me names like an immature child. Thanks.
There are rules of argumentation that pertain to logic, reason, & empiricism. But a neophyte like yourself wouldn't know about that. The dictionary is your freind retard--look up the word misogynist. He doesn't hate women--he is merely commenting on the behavior of most women in general. He has acknowledged time & again that there are women who are different, but he is speaking in general & what he says happens to be true, which is what you're really so butthurt about. Does the shoe fit?
@iiwatcher Okay, apparently now I'm a "retard"? I'm not going to bother arguing with someone who can't politely discuss an issue with me. Also, regardless of what you say, generalizing women is not okay, just as it is not okay to generalize blacks, asians, men, children, the elderly, etc. Generalizing only serves to make the world suck even more. And no, what he says is not "true." You have a particular bias, so I'm sure other people wouldn't agree with what you say.
@NintendoArielle NO, someone is not a racist if they speak about Blacks in general. You also don't know what racism means moron, look it up. I don't give a fuck what you appreciate. If a name fits it isn't calling names, it's telling the truth. The names fit you & the truth hurts. Deal with it little girl. ; )
@iiwatcher I know what racism is, and generalizing *is* racist, no matter how you spin it. If you're going to insult someone for no reason instead of handling it like an adult, then don't bother arguing at all. You're making yourself look ignorant and conceited.
@NintendoArielle Didn't even bother did you? Of course not. "generalizing *is* racist" You're a MORON. That's not name calling if it's the truth. What you said is moronic, therefore you're a moron. Get it? of course not, bc you're a moron. XD
As for the rest of your inane rant, baseless claims aren't valid counters. You simply don't have the intellectual ammo to speak with a man. Fuck off, little girl.
@bowenj10 Wow, dumb shits like NintendoArielle make me ashamed to be an atheist. I'm going to assume that he/she (most likely a she judging from the lack of intelligence) also does not believe in the existence of unicorns or space pixies — which is why I'm ashamed to be an aunicornist and an aspace-pixieist, as well.
@NintendoArielle Why are you so fucking surprised? What is the matter with you? Atheism isn't tolerant. It isn't a fucking thing. It's like ---- or meh or pfffftttttfuckyourself. It's just a fucking sound, a silent sound ejected from the idiot hole on the front of a dickhead's face every time he's asked to justify his incredible and utterly bollock basterdy fuck off you moronbag.
What the fuck kind of idiot are you? Do you even know what you are saying?
@ourben I personally find atheism to be tolerant in the sense that many atheists define themselves as humanists. Maybe not all are, but many share that philosophy. Seriously, what is your problem? Drink some Jack Daniels and calm the fuck down.
@NintendoArielle Okay I'll be honest with you. I did actually agree with what you said in sentiment - because the values you described are values I share (no really I do) - I just don't like people linking things together that aren't really connected. Sure, they are in some general sense, but it's not really a causal connection. The thing you said about choosing "atheism" really annoyed me though. That was a ludicrous thing to say. It's like saying you chose to have legs.
@NintendoArielle If atheism appeals to you because it doesn't disrespect women then you are a fucking baboon. There is no ifs or buts about it, you are a fucking baboon.
People choose religion because they think, or at least contest to it being the truth. People don't choose atheism. They just don't believe in god. When you are born you don't automatically believe in god. It has nothing to do with women. Atheism isn't even a word outside the fabricated fantasy universe theists create.
@ourben ..."Baboon?" I'm saying ONE of the reasons atheism appeals to me is because it doesn't outright say certain groups are inferior. People can form their own beliefs, but usually this doesn't lead to people looking down on others when there's no major source telling them to. Some people are brainwashed into the idea of superiority and inferiority; atheism doesn't do that, regardless of what the individual atheist chooses to believe.
@NintendoArielle I'm still not sure you fully appreciate the scope of atheism. Atheism is just a label created after the fact by theists ([a] [theist]) to describe people who did not choose theism. A rock is an atheist. A slice of cake is an atheist.
It's not really "a thing" it's more a "not a nothing".
@NintendoArielle Atheism is not a philosophy or anything of sorts. It is simply a disbelief in a deity, that's all. What you think atheism brings with it has no bearing on what atheism actually is. As regard to treating everyone equal - Tom does this, he respects only the people of both sexes that garner respect and treats the ones that don't, with disrespect. Respect is earned not given.
@grumpone I know, but I've found that atheism tends to harbor certain philosophies, such as the "humanism" movement and secularism. I meant that philosophies are *formed* from atheism, much in the way philosophies are formed by other types of people.
Tom is clearly not respectful of women. His constant insults thrown at them is more than enough evidence. For example, his generalization of single moms and how they should be avoided. Try to look at it from a female's point of view.
@NintendoArielle The main thing that should drive you away from religion is that it's a load of bogus with absolutely nothing to show for it. Even if the truth is not fun, the truth is the better choice.
@NintendoArielle you are just as bad as religious people. You shouldn't accept or deny a claim because you didn't like how you were treated. There are plenty of factions of the Christian faith that would treat you equally as men. You should accept claims that are true and deny claims that are false. And if a woman had claims that were true Leykis would treat her with the respect that she deserves.
@NintendoArielle What about atheism regards people as equals? An assertion that there is no God has nothing to do with moral creeds. I believe in God. To me Leykis is the first person who made me think more critically about it because he doesn't mince words. I think you should be proud of him. He may be a bit bitter but, its a radio show for entertainment. Much of what he does is obviously tongue in cheek exaggeration if you can't see that it really is sad.
Ha ha haha! She thinks that God exists because of psychic frauds like Sylvia Browne. Psychics are even condemned by some of these ranting Christian retards. even some these idiot know better but not this bitch. i have to stop writing because Iam laughing so hard.
ROFL!!!!!!!!!!! Just tupe in "Sylvia Brown" on YouTube and there are countless videos of how much of a fraud she is, along with all other psychics, etc..Haha
Hell, even if ghosts existed, it would have no bearing on the question of the existence of god. I mean, it could just be natural phenomena. But we're all clever enough to see this here. Kudos for us! (^_^)
@Mrmoc7 spelling a word incorrectly does not justify someone as being retarted. However the way most women act, the things they do, and how they view the world, in my eyes is how a retard would. So to answer your question, women are retarted. That is why men make more money, make better decisions, and run this shit hole world in general, ah hell i'm retarded too, but its more interesting that way, because you never know what's going to happen, because it probobly already did and i forgot.
Fact. A faith based organization rules themselves out from 'knowing' anything. It's right there in their religious texts. Evidence of things hoped for and substance of things not seen.
'Hope' and 'not seen' are not things you associate with knowledge. Fact.
@alfonsothewhite Well, For the majority of atheist I understand that the reason you dont believe is because you dont see the proof for it. And, as a christian I fully understand that and honsestly see that point of view. But my main question is why not give it a shot or if you have why not stick with it ? Im not talking about going to church, tithes, etc etc, but just seeking a personal relationship and seeing if you dont feel God or find that proof?
KesslersCross 3 weeks ago
Mincaye Enquedi murdered American missionaries in his native Ecuador in the 1950's. He converted to Christianity, developed a deep love for the families of the missionaries he killed, and has been a preacher for several decades. This is documented in the film "End of the Spear." If Christianity is a hoax, it is the most life-transforming "hoax" ever devised.
quemacha 2 months ago
@quemacha Christianity isnt a hoax, its a business.
Its business based on some degree of history.
The problem is that people take it seriously.
MultiSmartass1 1 month ago
I came across this trying to find "Ask An Atheist", a show I like. Tom you are a pitiful atheist, your show is pitiful, and you are a pitiful human being. I'm surprised you didn't call her a dumb woman and tell her to get in the kitchen.
CamillaCalamity 2 months ago
@CamillaCalamity You let your emotions get in the way of critical thinking. You don't have to like everything he says, but that doesn't mean it isn't the truth.
LOGICandREAS0N 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CamillaCalamity You let your emotions get in the way of critical thinking. You don't have to like everything he says, but that doesn't mean it isn't the truth.
LOGICandREAS0N 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@CamillaCalamity You let your emotions get in the way of critical thinking. You don't have to like everything he says, but that doesn't mean it isn't the truth.
LOGICandREAS0N 1 day ago
So you're delusional if you talk about something that you can't prove exists? erm no... but otherwise I almost completely agree with everything Tom is saying.
Redflowers9 3 months ago
The only thing the Montel Williams show proves is that enough money is made off the show for him to continue making the show. That's it.
tcsam9202 3 months ago
It's like telling an adult there is no Santa
lago4 4 months ago
if there was a god he wouldnt produce these mindless sheep that believe ANYTHING that is broadcast on tv, sylvia browne is one of the most evil people on earth
hobbohippy2 4 months ago
HAHAHAHA!!! A closet New-Ager uses Sylvia Brown and Montel Williams to prove the existence of God.
Aphrocraft 5 months ago
I have a few questions for an atheist if anyone would care to responed. I am a christian and the study of why atheist believe in what they do fascinates me for some reason.
KesslersCross 5 months ago
@KesslersCross What is it that you believe atheists believe?
bowenj10 5 months ago
@bowenj10 Well, not so much what I think you all believe but all science, church talk and theology aside. Out of every bit of knowledge that is in the world, every book, every fact, every literal word of knowledge...what percentage of that knowledge do you think that a typical college graduate common sense person would have?
KesslersCross 5 months ago
@KesslersCross The percentage is so small as to be irrelevant.
bowenj10 5 months ago
@bowenj10 Exactly how I see it. So couldnt it be logical to assume that God could exist inside of that percentage of knowledge that we do not know? Im not trying to do one of these stupid trick you christian questions though it does fit into that catagory, its not im intentions. I just cant understand why it seems so improbable for atheist to look into the possibility when, if its true, so much is at stake.
KesslersCross 5 months ago
@KesslersCross No, it's not logical. Religious gods are supernatural beings. If scientists proved the existence of supernatural beings, then they would not, by definition, be supernatural beings. Otherwise, all claims of existence of supernatural beings are no better (or worse) than the claim that a flying pink unicorn is standing right next to you right now.
bowenj10 5 months ago
@bowenj10 Also, the idea of an atheist professing faith in something that he doesn't actually believe in has a name: Pascal's Wager. Pascal's Wager is a ridiculous idea for the following reason: if God is supposedly an omniscient being, then "he" would know that a person who is claiming to believe but who doesn't actually believe is in fact lying (otherwise, God is not omniscient).
bowenj10 5 months ago
@bowenj10 It's actually ridiculous because another "Wager" can be built that has the same ethical and logical value of Pascal's one, thus making it actually NOT the most intelligent "bet" a rational human could make (the Atheist's Wager).
rainwizard 4 months ago
@bowenj10 Maybe, but what if God exists on a level of knowledge that we do not understand yet.What if he is some other deminsional being or something. I undersatnd what your saying and from your perspective would totally agree.Now, something that few people hear. What if there was a way to prove God?What if there was a path so to speak where there was a confirmation. I dont mean though arguments, scientific debates etc but a way for you personally to know,would you look into it then?
KesslersCross 5 months ago
@KesslersCross That doesn't make sense. Your trying to play the ignorant card in order to try to seem like it's more likely that any crazy idea you come up with is more likely.
Your also assuming atheists haven't considered religion. I bet you more atheists have considered religion more than any group of believers. Believers are the ones who don't consider that they could be wrong. Do you ask yourself what if Allah is right or Zeus or thousands of other religions? Aren't you afraid?
RuinSonic 4 months ago
@RuinSonic 1. Lol, dude your looking way to deep into my question, I have no tricks up my sleeve. Sure it makes sense. All throughout the bible knowledge is a key word used all the time. And, I agree. I have found many atheist know the bible better than a lot of christians do. Thats why I like a lot of atheist because many are not so much against it, they just dont see the evidence and have questions. I preach, and unlike many preachers, I challange the people to ask themselves if they truly
KesslersCross 4 months ago
@KesslersCross "I have no tricks up my sleeve."
I don't think you have tricks up your sleeve. You are just parroting a really bad argument.
RuinSonic 4 months ago
@RuinSonic 2. believe. Many were raised in it, taught to never question. The way I see it, to truly believe without doubt is when the words in the Bible are received, then applied, and a person can then see the results.Thats all most honest atheist want is proof. Church folks now are terrified to make God real in their lives when it is written to try the spirits.The bible details many things that a believer should be able to do and cant because they dont truly have faith anymore.
KesslersCross 4 months ago
@KesslersCross "any were raised in it, taught to never question."
Great I hope you ask everyone in your congregation to seriously consider and understand evolution and the arguments against the Bible before debating about it. It would sure make my life easier.
"a person can then see the results"
And when I was a Christian I didn't see results and what people claimed as results were pretty easily explainable by natural happenstance and psychology.
RuinSonic 4 months ago
@RuinSonic I really dont go into evolution that much. I know just by talking to some of my congragation that some believe in evolution and some dont but I dont feel the need to go into it. Im only an amature scientist like many that debate that cause. Exactly, many do not see it and to me that is where it begins becuase I didnt either once I started questioning it. I think though that science can explain many if not all "micicles"
KesslersCross 4 months ago
@KesslersCross
That was your first mistake thinking that science will tell us all the answers. In fact many atheists have argued that Science will probably never give us the answer to why the universe exists and how we should live our lives. That's where I have a problem. I think the universe is miraculously wonderful but I'm not for solving a mystery with a mystery. As far as I know nothing has indicated that our minds our independent of matter. Why should I consider God as plausible?
RuinSonic 4 months ago
@RuinSonic I didnt know that and I think that was a very good statement. From my point of view, I see it that what can be or will be answered in science is simply an answer to how God did it.You and atheist though dont attribute a scientific answer to a God and I dont know why that offends some christians.So either way science is still the key to the same answer.Regardless of the who or what was behind it, the answer is still the answer.Why not consider him as plausible?
KesslersCross 4 months ago
@KesslersCross "I see it that what can be or will be answered in science is simply an answer to how God did it."
But then why claim there is a God if science could explain it? Or why not say God is just the energy and the reason for existence?
"Why not consider him as plausible?"
First off I honestly don't know. The closer you get to a personal God found in a religion the more implausible the idea is to me. The simple answer is God just adds more inexplicability to the inexplicable problem.
RuinSonic 4 months ago
@KesslersCross Of course I wouldn't believe anything with any amount of confidence if I didn't have strong evidence for it. If it could be shown that God is necessary and there was evidence of immaterial objects or if God starts becoming a strongly predictable theory, then it's likely I'd be convinced.
God gives epistemic comfort to some, but there is no verification or explanation for the idea to give me any confidence that in the lack of knowledge of the universe we can conclude on God.
RuinSonic 4 months ago
@KesslersCross "So couldnt it be logical to assume that God could exist inside of that percentage of knowledge that we do not know?" I know Bowen has answered this, but I'd like to take a crack also. Setting aside logic, sure, it's possible something could exist. Okay, evidence? Christians are always claiming that they KNOW god exists, but not a single shred of hard evidence has been offered.. I've studied and thought about this a great deal--and no convincing argument has ever been put forward.
DandAinTac 1 month ago
@KesslersCross Theres a pretty simple premise to atheism that religious people will NEVER understand. It is the fact that WE DO NOT KNOW if there is a god so we don't say we believe there is. There is no evidence to support the idea of religious gods anywhere in nature, logic, or science... YET. And until we find a supernatural being that claims and proves itself as master architect of reality, we will not act as if there is. Look at the history of any religion, what good did it do for humanity?
rmhanzel 2 hours ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@KesslersCross I'll answer any question you want to ask :-)
JamesIsKing30 5 months ago
@KesslersCross Atheism is not a belief in anything. It is the position that there is no evidence to support a belief in a god. That is it. There is nothing more.
donepearce 3 months ago
@donepearce By definition sure, I agree. But your statement does not fit the majority according to their actions. Most take a firm stand against any reasoning, any logic, any evidence simply for the the cause to do so and nothing more. Its the same with Christians though, most do not fit what is supposed to be the guidelines of the definition. So, the factor of human nature using a shield for their personal wants and beliefs comes into play.
KesslersCross 3 months ago
@KesslersCross - Why don't you start out by, 1st, proving a god exists,then we can go on from there. But you have no proof of such a being, Atheist make no such claim, however Christians and people of "faith" do make such a claim...so where's the beef? Until proof can be provided, there remains NO GOOD REASON to believe in any gods, devils, ghosts, supernatural beings, none of them.
JOHNINCOLUMBUS 3 months ago
What an idiot.
JOHNINCOLUMBUS 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JOHNINCOLUMBUS Prove me wrong
KesslersCross 3 months ago
@KesslersCross Why do we believe what we do? We are not in the position to be supporting our beliefs for we have none, in a sense, that is.We have been shown no evidence for a god and, as such, don't believe in one. We are making no unsupported claims so the burden of proof is not on us. The burden of proof would be on you or outwardly religious people to support their claim that there is a god. Likewise, if I said there was a small teapot orbiting the earth, you would need proof to believe it.
QuickWittedRetort 2 months ago
@KesslersCross Atheists dont believe in anything. That is why they are athiests.
MultiSmartass1 1 month ago
@MultiSmartass1 Atheists don't believe in ANYTHING? I do hope that is a joke, considering that atheism is the stance on one (1) specific issue.
Atheists are good people because they choose to be so, not because they hope for some sort of reward in the future.
Atheists believe in love, happiness, respect, ethics, and many other things, just like everyone else.
LOGICandREAS0N 1 day ago
@LOGICandREAS0N I guess I should have been more specific.
Athiests dont believe in anything resembling a deity.
In fact, the Atheists I know put their stock in logic and reason and not anything resembling a belief system.
Actually, Im a Deist and therefore never make value judgement on Athiests since the ones I know are often better people than religious people I have met and known.
Most religious people are hypocrites anyway-they pick and choose their ideology.
MultiSmartass1 1 day ago
Good god... God exists because he can "read" idiots minds on T.V. ROFL!
cmacinnis 8 months ago
The first woman thinks Sylvia Browne is legit? That should be a red flag right there.
HardforJesus 9 months ago
Lol at another clip in which said Tom said that you don't deserve respect --- you earn it. And yet here, he says that he is losing respect for the caller by the moment, despite her having done nothing to earn it.
And lol at the caller, who keeps on insisting that she "knows it". And when she's shot down, she says she "believes it".
These guys are a riot.
fogelifil 9 months ago
Thank god women are so gulible and can be convinced of goofy stuff like this, or I wouldn't have gotten laid half as much as I have. :)
SmokeRingsPipeDreams 11 months ago
yes Sylvia Brown is a very gifted psychic tom is a loser with no show!!! GOD took him off the air!!!
republicanpatriot100 1 year ago
@republicanpatriot100 he's coming back on air next year....so that means God wanted him back right?......please don't make us look bad religion is suppose to make us loving of people and forgiving not spiteful and hateful.Besides some of these people who call in really have stupid reasons for believing and besides belief is just that belief isn't I know it's I think.The moment they start trying to prove that they know.....it's a damn shame
PwnerGeist 11 months ago
@republicanpatriot100
Ok, you have the name republican patriot, believe in god, & think brown is something other than an idiotic waste of skin who exploits peoples emotions by doing cold reading [badly]. Are you a tea partier who watches beck, also? You have the IQ for it.
sakar181 10 months ago
Oddly enough, Sylvia Browne lead me to atheism. lol jk jk
greyeyed123 1 year ago
Sylvia Browne? Fuck, who could give her any credit anymore? All one needs to do is look at the wikipage and check the references and see that she is full of shit and fails every attempt at anything psychic.
EyeLickChildren 1 year ago
Thinks that was a prank call.
sweetsweatyfeet 1 year ago
Sorry for misspellings. Btw. why should we "keep in mind" anything "from a woman's point of view"? There is not woman's or men's point of view on the definition of atheist! You don't get it! And btw, guys, we don't get either! Stop arguing with women! They'll never get it! They don't want to. All they're pseudo-intellectual blather melts away for them when you give them a warm smile, a kiss and a hard cock. That's all they really want anyway. Civilization could crumble as longasthey feel special
ppsmalls1 1 year ago
we tend to invent things, create art, architecture, civilizations, etc., and not spend our lives worrying whether Brad likes us or Janine's a bitch. That's too draining; a job for worrywarts, followers and the immature-heterosexual women and most men, too. Keep up, the intellectual inquiry, though, Arielle, although I don't think you'll find it amenable. Most women don't. It makes them feel unwomanly.
ppsmalls1 1 year ago
"Today I'm a punk. Today I'm a opera fan. Today I'm an atheist." She'd probably marry Hitler if he treated her nice and got along with her friends. Arielle, I know what you're saying 'cuz I'm a secular Jewish male and many of us are atheist, liberal Democrats, Obama supporters, etc. but not all. Atheism is lack of theism plain and simple. Dig a bit deeper 'cuz we men tend to take words at face value, we're not interpreting the miasma of emotion behind it. We speak a common language whcih is why
ppsmalls1 1 year ago
Also, according to her logic she must be a racist. I quote- "generalizing 'is' racist." She is generalizing atheist as wonderful, fair-minded pdople who don't, or are less prone, to hate. You tried to tell her it's not a belief system, merely the lack of a belief in god(s). She probably thinks we're all liberal Democrat, vegan, hippies who recycles and like craft beer. Like many women, she probably thinks wearing the garb of a certain sub-culture makes her a part of it.
ppsmalls1 1 year ago
bowenj10 and iiwatcher-well said, but you're trying to explain to a woman. A smart woman, but a woman, nonetheless and it's difficult, if not impossible, to divorce her emotions from the argument. She doesn't get it, 'cuz she's possibly and atheist for emotional reasons (some religions subordinate women) rather than metaphysical ones. She finds it hard to parse out the denotative definitions of "atheism", "racism" and "generalization" from the life situations in which they appear. Sloppy thinkin
ppsmalls1 1 year ago
"no u wont cos ull be DED"
lolll
mikesomething 1 year ago
"But if Im right then when you die you wont know because you'll be dead."
"..Well, yeah but then I'll know."
"No you wont. You cant know because you're dead."
"Well I just don't believe that."
That back and forth won my subscription.
Zombie1990 1 year ago 2
Is Pro Wresteling fake? Half of the time yes.
Al Gore saying that Gloal warming is a fact? No and there are thousands of scientists that prove it.
Are ghosts real? What evidence is there
Phycics real? What proof is there
man11withaplan 1 year ago
i want to cum in his mouth
kaykaykaykaykk 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
As a fellow atheist, I'm ashamed of Leykis. To me, atheism regards people as equals, yet he continually degrades people he doesn't like (women). Many religions treat women as inferior, which is one of the things that drove me away from religion. Yet here this guy is, making atheism look bad. Thanks a lot, Tom.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle Atheism doesn't involve taking any positions one way or another on anything. Atheism is simply a lack of belief in a deity. That's it. There's absolutely nothing more to it than that. It's simply the opposite of theism, which is the belief in a deity. As an atheist, you're certainly welcome to have your own views on whatever you want, but they're no more representative of atheism than Christianity's views are of theism. Perhaps you should crack open a book once in a while.
bowenj10 1 year ago 16
@bowenj10 Maybe you should've read my implied context. I know what the definition of atheism is; I was specifically referring to how Leykis disrespects half of Earth's population, much in the way many religions do. As I originally mentioned in my post, atheism was appealing to me because it does not tell women that they are inferior to men. Please pay attention to the context next time.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle Why even bother mentioning atheism in the context of a discussion of respect or disrespect of women. Atheism has absolutely nothing to do with respect or disrespect of women. Tom's lack of respect for women has absolutely nothing to do with atheism. Why you think it does is beyond me.
bowenj10 1 year ago 7
@bowenj10 Once again, you overlook the context. I mentioned it because I'm surprised an atheist could treat women so poorly. Usually it's religion that creates that ideology, whereas atheism more egalitarian and tolerant.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle You clearly don't know anything about atheism. Atheism is neither egalitarian nor tolerant nor anything else with respect to pretty much anything. One could be an atheist and also believe in raping women, eating babies, and doing anything else - other than believing in deities, of course. Again, atheism is simply the lack of belief in a deity. THAT'S IT! There's nothing more to it than that. Egalitarianism and tolerance are NOT tenets of atheism.
bowenj10 1 year ago 5
@bowenj10 Yes, I do know about atheism. Once again, in context, I was mentioning that there is nothing in atheism that says "treat a certain type of person as inferior." That's it. Get it?
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle No there isn't, but if someone makes weak points or starts to talk about something they don't know, cricular reasoning, logical fallacies or try for example to dismiss a Scientiffic Theory yet they show that they have few understanding of what they try to dismiss etc etc and so on and so forth... well, is not that we treat them as inferior, they've done all the work for us, they shot on theyr own foot... and yet Atheists are often called arrogants ... sorry but lmao
DocStrange0123 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle Just to make this very, very, very clear. 'Theism' is simply the belief in a deity. It doesn't matter what the deity is. Atheism, then, having the prefix 'a-', which means 'not' or 'without', attached to the word 'theism', is simply the lack of belief in a deity. That is ALL there is to each concept. Neither concept has any other tenets. A Christian can be a theist and a misogynist can be an atheist, but not all theists and atheists are Christians and misogynists. Get it?
bowenj10 1 year ago 2
@bowenj10 I know atheists can be misogynists (hence, Tom Leykis, a sad excuse for a man), but I am pointing out that there is nothing in atheism that asks its associators to hate other people for no reason. Get it?
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle And there's nothing that doesn't...god you're thick! You're incorrectly insinuating that atheism is some sort of belief system or is attached to some code of ethics. It isn't. It is merely lack of belief in a god. Leykis's views on women have nothing to do with atheism. GET IT?
iiwatcher 1 year ago
@iiwatcher I never said atheism was a belief system. I said it doesn't ask people to believe something so extreme. That doesn't mean I was saying it's a "system" like Christianity. You're the thick one if you have to resort to insulting me.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
Atheism doesn't ask that anyone believe anything. All it means is an absence of belief in any deity. Why are you surprised that an atheist can be a misogynist unless you think atheism is somehow counterpoised to any belief system, which would require it contain a belief system of its own? Further, he is not a misogynist. He is not speaking of all women. He says so time and again.He's speaking in general & it's true. Just bc the truth hurts doesn't mean you can dismiss it. You fucking DOLT! XD
iiwatcher 1 year ago
@iiwatcher That is exactly what I'm saying. Since there is no defined set of rules, people can form their own beliefs. As for why I'm surprised an atheist can be a misogynist, I know it's possible, but I think it's much less likely. And regardless of what you say (keep in mind that as a woman, I view him differently), he *is* a misogynist. Isn't someone still a racist if they "speak of black people in general"?
I'd appreciate it if you didn't call me names like an immature child. Thanks.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
There are rules of argumentation that pertain to logic, reason, & empiricism. But a neophyte like yourself wouldn't know about that. The dictionary is your freind retard--look up the word misogynist. He doesn't hate women--he is merely commenting on the behavior of most women in general. He has acknowledged time & again that there are women who are different, but he is speaking in general & what he says happens to be true, which is what you're really so butthurt about. Does the shoe fit?
iiwatcher 1 year ago
@iiwatcher Okay, apparently now I'm a "retard"? I'm not going to bother arguing with someone who can't politely discuss an issue with me. Also, regardless of what you say, generalizing women is not okay, just as it is not okay to generalize blacks, asians, men, children, the elderly, etc. Generalizing only serves to make the world suck even more. And no, what he says is not "true." You have a particular bias, so I'm sure other people wouldn't agree with what you say.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle NO, someone is not a racist if they speak about Blacks in general. You also don't know what racism means moron, look it up. I don't give a fuck what you appreciate. If a name fits it isn't calling names, it's telling the truth. The names fit you & the truth hurts. Deal with it little girl. ; )
iiwatcher 1 year ago 2
@iiwatcher I know what racism is, and generalizing *is* racist, no matter how you spin it. If you're going to insult someone for no reason instead of handling it like an adult, then don't bother arguing at all. You're making yourself look ignorant and conceited.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle Didn't even bother did you? Of course not. "generalizing *is* racist" You're a MORON. That's not name calling if it's the truth. What you said is moronic, therefore you're a moron. Get it? of course not, bc you're a moron. XD
As for the rest of your inane rant, baseless claims aren't valid counters. You simply don't have the intellectual ammo to speak with a man. Fuck off, little girl.
iiwatcher 1 year ago 5
@bowenj10 Come on now. If you lay it out all clear like that, how can theist make strawmangle arguments? You're going to ruin everything for them.
newcoyote 1 year ago
@bowenj10 Wow, dumb shits like NintendoArielle make me ashamed to be an atheist. I'm going to assume that he/she (most likely a she judging from the lack of intelligence) also does not believe in the existence of unicorns or space pixies — which is why I'm ashamed to be an aunicornist and an aspace-pixieist, as well.
Tsicar 11 months ago 7
@NintendoArielle Why are you so fucking surprised? What is the matter with you? Atheism isn't tolerant. It isn't a fucking thing. It's like ---- or meh or pfffftttttfuckyourself. It's just a fucking sound, a silent sound ejected from the idiot hole on the front of a dickhead's face every time he's asked to justify his incredible and utterly bollock basterdy fuck off you moronbag.
What the fuck kind of idiot are you? Do you even know what you are saying?
ourben 1 year ago
@ourben I personally find atheism to be tolerant in the sense that many atheists define themselves as humanists. Maybe not all are, but many share that philosophy. Seriously, what is your problem? Drink some Jack Daniels and calm the fuck down.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle Okay I'll be honest with you. I did actually agree with what you said in sentiment - because the values you described are values I share (no really I do) - I just don't like people linking things together that aren't really connected. Sure, they are in some general sense, but it's not really a causal connection. The thing you said about choosing "atheism" really annoyed me though. That was a ludicrous thing to say. It's like saying you chose to have legs.
ourben 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle If atheism appeals to you because it doesn't disrespect women then you are a fucking baboon. There is no ifs or buts about it, you are a fucking baboon.
People choose religion because they think, or at least contest to it being the truth. People don't choose atheism. They just don't believe in god. When you are born you don't automatically believe in god. It has nothing to do with women. Atheism isn't even a word outside the fabricated fantasy universe theists create.
Shut up.
ourben 1 year ago
@ourben ..."Baboon?" I'm saying ONE of the reasons atheism appeals to me is because it doesn't outright say certain groups are inferior. People can form their own beliefs, but usually this doesn't lead to people looking down on others when there's no major source telling them to. Some people are brainwashed into the idea of superiority and inferiority; atheism doesn't do that, regardless of what the individual atheist chooses to believe.
Feel free not to jump to conclusions next time.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle I'm still not sure you fully appreciate the scope of atheism. Atheism is just a label created after the fact by theists ([a] [theist]) to describe people who did not choose theism. A rock is an atheist. A slice of cake is an atheist.
It's not really "a thing" it's more a "not a nothing".
ourben 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle Atheism is not a philosophy or anything of sorts. It is simply a disbelief in a deity, that's all. What you think atheism brings with it has no bearing on what atheism actually is. As regard to treating everyone equal - Tom does this, he respects only the people of both sexes that garner respect and treats the ones that don't, with disrespect. Respect is earned not given.
grumpone 1 year ago
@grumpone I know, but I've found that atheism tends to harbor certain philosophies, such as the "humanism" movement and secularism. I meant that philosophies are *formed* from atheism, much in the way philosophies are formed by other types of people.
Tom is clearly not respectful of women. His constant insults thrown at them is more than enough evidence. For example, his generalization of single moms and how they should be avoided. Try to look at it from a female's point of view.
NintendoArielle 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle The main thing that should drive you away from religion is that it's a load of bogus with absolutely nothing to show for it. Even if the truth is not fun, the truth is the better choice.
realisticHomeboy 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle you are just as bad as religious people. You shouldn't accept or deny a claim because you didn't like how you were treated. There are plenty of factions of the Christian faith that would treat you equally as men. You should accept claims that are true and deny claims that are false. And if a woman had claims that were true Leykis would treat her with the respect that she deserves.
JordanKimball 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle What about atheism regards people as equals? An assertion that there is no God has nothing to do with moral creeds. I believe in God. To me Leykis is the first person who made me think more critically about it because he doesn't mince words. I think you should be proud of him. He may be a bit bitter but, its a radio show for entertainment. Much of what he does is obviously tongue in cheek exaggeration if you can't see that it really is sad.
frimports 1 year ago
Are you kidding me?
Leykis loves women, he thinks they're better than males.
As long as they're hot.
animekid200 1 year ago
@NintendoArielle idiot
thisgame2 1 year ago
Ha ha haha! She thinks that God exists because of psychic frauds like Sylvia Browne. Psychics are even condemned by some of these ranting Christian retards. even some these idiot know better but not this bitch. i have to stop writing because Iam laughing so hard.
MultiSmartass1 1 year ago
ROFL!!!!!!!!!!! Just tupe in "Sylvia Brown" on YouTube and there are countless videos of how much of a fraud she is, along with all other psychics, etc..Haha
emperorles 1 year ago
crippled christ on a crutch people are stupid...
stongej 1 year ago
Sylvia Brown? It scares me to death how man people believe that low life scum. She is a cold reader. Not even better than simple parlor tricks.
newcoyote 1 year ago
OMG this bitch is fucking stupid.
drewhadou 1 year ago 3
Christ! After hearing some of these whack-jobs flap their gums, I feel so fortunate to be Atheist
xStoochx 1 year ago
telepathy? LMAO
sk80soarus 1 year ago
people pray ..so there is a god...
reli logic.
robot014 2 years ago
Jesus H. Christ women are so fucking stupid.
mordanai 2 years ago 4
Hell, even if ghosts existed, it would have no bearing on the question of the existence of god. I mean, it could just be natural phenomena. But we're all clever enough to see this here. Kudos for us! (^_^)
maugustyniak 2 years ago
repeat it again, i know it. pretty much what tom did before he changed formats. lol, good stuff none the less
doctortalk121 2 years ago
Tom rules!
12stepfailure 2 years ago
jesus christ... women are so retarted. it's sickening
DustinJames100 2 years ago 3
@DustinJames100
lol, you #FAIL at spelling retarded. Now who's the retarded one?
Mrmoc7 1 year ago
@Mrmoc7 spelling a word incorrectly does not justify someone as being retarted. However the way most women act, the things they do, and how they view the world, in my eyes is how a retard would. So to answer your question, women are retarted. That is why men make more money, make better decisions, and run this shit hole world in general, ah hell i'm retarded too, but its more interesting that way, because you never know what's going to happen, because it probobly already did and i forgot.
DustinJames100 1 year ago
@DustinJames100
#LAWL
Mrmoc7 1 year ago
lals!
CognosSquare 2 years ago
Fact. A faith based organization rules themselves out from 'knowing' anything. It's right there in their religious texts. Evidence of things hoped for and substance of things not seen.
'Hope' and 'not seen' are not things you associate with knowledge. Fact.
eyeonwashparish 2 years ago 2
this lady is seriously retarded. how can people think like her??!?!?!?!?
anetchi 2 years ago 3
He pwned her.
TSMontana 2 years ago 4
jesus fucking pork-banger christ
THEREIZNOGOD 2 years ago 5
you'll spend eternity with him
jiffylube2u 2 years ago
"oh god, is that what montel has devolved into?" hahaha amazing! hahahah
TomLeykisClips 2 years ago 2
If there is a God he would not manifest himself through Montel.
ricardodelgado 2 years ago 22
Montel is totally the second coming of Christ, what are you talking about? OMG you are ignorant! lol
vwguyaz87 2 years ago 4
I was being sarcastic dipshit!!!!
ricardodelgado 2 years ago
actually i wasnt being sarcastic, why would God if he exists show up via Montel? He is a TV clown.
ricardodelgado 2 years ago
Montel is actually a pretty smart guy. He's smart enough to know that in his time slot, he needs to appeal to idiots.
thegreatpadaxes 2 years ago 36
"I think there is a god out there there because of Montel William show". Incredible.
mountainpatriot 2 years ago 7
tom sounds different.
asdfxyz1 2 years ago
hahahahaha people believe anything
toms the fuckin man
xANTIxHUMANx 2 years ago 5