its an automatic supra, 0-60 of several weeks and heavy as f**k. Saxo sounded like it had a pipe on it, probably induction kit too, maybe sticking out somewhere around 130whp. would wipe the floor with any auto supra. also the dude is right, autos are hard to drive fast. you let off the throttle they change into a higher gear! Moral of the story, don't by the cheapest model of something, buy the best or buy something else!
wow alex reed the retard driving a celica thinking its a supra omg no wonder you got fucked by a vts automatic or not supras chuck out 225 bhp n/a and about 340ft-lb of torque where as a vts puts out only 117bhp and about 107ft-lb of torque you fucking squid alex this should be on fail blog
@hellonpluto Saxo's rule? hahaha don't even make me laugh! This supra driver can't shift or drive it. Saxo's = Slow and Riced up with boy racers in them thinking they are fast! A VTS is nippy but nothing special!
dude it dnt matter that you had it in o/d its the man butten that starts you in 2nd if yr in drive. should have used the gear option, bad vid 4 supras!
Why did you buy an N/A Supra? No wonder you lost, they weigh about as much as your mom lololol. But seriously sell it, fork up an extra 2-3 grand and get a turbo ;)
That saxo must have been tuned in some way, as they're slow as shit too.
I'm a mechanic for a Renault team my friend, i dont need one, i own a 59 plate Impreza with 300+ bhp, along with a few others.. run along e warrior, you know your place.
If i wanted to start a argument i'm sure you'd know about it, stating that VTS is quick is not arguing, ive owned 3 vts' and i can assure you ive seen the best of cars be left behind, all you need is new cams and re-mapping, stripped, and your laughing.
They have a chav rep, but im sure most chav's cannot afford the insurence on a vts, plus im sure you aint driving nothing special.
I hope you know a vts 0-60 is 7.4 sec, a turbo chitter is 7.8 sec, i've worked on a few and they only put out around 130bhp, which is nothing compared to the weight of the car.
btw, more fun in a celica, id rather drive a mobility chair on the m25
That cracked me up!! Auto's are so hard to drive! Like something out of this is Essex.
Abz1324 1 month ago
NA Automatic are shit...
I have 1997 SZ JDM RHD swaped to LHD and i eat anyday stock Subaru WRX...
LeonidK340 8 months ago
its an automatic supra, 0-60 of several weeks and heavy as f**k. Saxo sounded like it had a pipe on it, probably induction kit too, maybe sticking out somewhere around 130whp. would wipe the floor with any auto supra. also the dude is right, autos are hard to drive fast. you let off the throttle they change into a higher gear! Moral of the story, don't by the cheapest model of something, buy the best or buy something else!
mad2bthee 10 months ago
fakee
takis760 11 months ago
take them both over 100 to 140 then see which takes lead!
loudandproud205 11 months ago
not a hope in hell, as mentioned power to weight and it's an auto. as for n/a supras being crushed? nah, just give them an na-t kit.
ZeroTrackAttack 1 year ago
I love it when ricers get any model of a car thinking they're all stupid fast.
Did they really think an NA auto supra was going to be fast?
D3s15 1 year ago
wow alex reed the retard driving a celica thinking its a supra omg no wonder you got fucked by a vts automatic or not supras chuck out 225 bhp n/a and about 340ft-lb of torque where as a vts puts out only 117bhp and about 107ft-lb of torque you fucking squid alex this should be on fail blog
DNGRSDAZ 1 year ago
@DNGRSDAZ Ever heard of a power to weight ratio? Supras are pretty heavy.
225bhp in a supra does fuck-all.
D3s15 1 year ago
The other car was just faster. Probably a stock supra vs a built car.
EricSV2012 1 year ago
i didnt over drive full of shit lol
brettwill87 1 year ago
don't think it's a supra
lulzland 1 year ago 2
SAXOOOOOOO NORMAL !!! saxo's best !!!
the2tueur 1 year ago
i was expecting the sax to get mauled
beermonstah 1 year ago
NA Auto... :-) grow a pair and take on a TT
suprasize1 1 year ago
What a fucking retard
BenH333 1 year ago
Probably the most retarded Supra driver ever...
Gives Supra owners a bad name !
kill1308 1 year ago
hahahaaaaaa SAXO RULLEEEEE
hellonpluto 1 year ago 3
@hellonpluto Saxo's rule? hahaha don't even make me laugh! This supra driver can't shift or drive it. Saxo's = Slow and Riced up with boy racers in them thinking they are fast! A VTS is nippy but nothing special!
astraVXRchannel 1 year ago
@astraVXRchannel no he got owned by a saxo hes a cock and sounds like gayer
hellonpluto 1 year ago
Passenger - "Yeah well the thing is automatics are hard to drive" LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
PugMarshall2906 1 year ago 20
@PugMarshall2906 I think what he means is.... accelerating with an automatic sucks... manual all the way....
But still.. the supra should have slaughtered that saxo lol
KGPDK 1 year ago
@PugMarshall2906 i know what a belle*d automatics are hard to drive what the fu*k is he saying!!
Bulgal123 9 months ago
OWNED!!!!!!!!!!
supafly1982 1 year ago
Erm, first off learn how to use your gearbox.
Id suggest joining the MKiv club. There is already a topic on this video
Raven431 2 years ago
dude it dnt matter that you had it in o/d its the man butten that starts you in 2nd if yr in drive. should have used the gear option, bad vid 4 supras!
900bhpsupra 2 years ago
Wow, you guys arguing are almost as gay as this British guy racing a Citroen...
zunetrav4 2 years ago
fake
mikrosomos 2 years ago
lol supra got owned and listen to the shit excuses he is comin out with, vts and gti will do them all day long
fwetness 2 years ago
surprise me? i thought the supra was goin to win when you said surprise me!
karengoodley62 2 years ago
The toyota super can do a lot more than 100 mph (over 140 mph).
LOTLOTMOT 2 years ago
Saxo is the greatest car!!!!Hi from Serbia!!:D
deep89n 2 years ago
haha french shit wins
ploiuio 2 years ago
Why did you buy an N/A Supra? No wonder you lost, they weigh about as much as your mom lololol. But seriously sell it, fork up an extra 2-3 grand and get a turbo ;)
That saxo must have been tuned in some way, as they're slow as shit too.
joe588 2 years ago
ther actuali not tht slow !
hudson01 2 years ago
VTS are far from slow, just shows you know nothing about cars.
YZ125PIMPED 2 years ago
@YZ125PIMPED. it's a citoren saxo. They are slow. They are a 1.6 litre hatch back with less than 150hp.
They are slow and will never be a sports car. Guess you own one then?
joe588 2 years ago
Own one?
I'm a mechanic for a Renault team my friend, i dont need one, i own a 59 plate Impreza with 300+ bhp, along with a few others.. run along e warrior, you know your place.
grow some balls you little e-warrior.
YZ125PIMPED 2 years ago
@YZ125PIMPED Then why are you sticking up for some little kids coffin on wheels then?
You're the one that started the argument anyway "e-warrior"
joe588 2 years ago
If i wanted to start a argument i'm sure you'd know about it, stating that VTS is quick is not arguing, ive owned 3 vts' and i can assure you ive seen the best of cars be left behind, all you need is new cams and re-mapping, stripped, and your laughing.
They have a chav rep, but im sure most chav's cannot afford the insurence on a vts, plus im sure you aint driving nothing special.
YZ125PIMPED 2 years ago
@YZ125PIMPED The vts I've been in wasn't anything special. Yes it was a nippy little hatchback up to 60, but it wasn't fast.
And it's still a saxo. That's the bottom line there.
No my car isn't anything special, it's a knackered old celica turbo - but I find it a hell of a lot more fun than any french hatchback :)
joe588 2 years ago
What a fail, a celica turbo?
I hope you know a vts 0-60 is 7.4 sec, a turbo chitter is 7.8 sec, i've worked on a few and they only put out around 130bhp, which is nothing compared to the weight of the car.
btw, more fun in a celica, id rather drive a mobility chair on the m25
YZ125PIMPED 2 years ago
@YZ125PIMPED ??
Turbo chitter? are you talking about the celica?
225bhp and 0-60 in 6.7. Mine was last dyno'd at 248.
joe588 2 years ago
LMFAO,
they pulled your pants down over that mate.
YZ125PIMPED 2 years ago
@YZ125PIMPED You're starting to confuse me here, which bit don't you beleive?
joe588 2 years ago
OMG thats fucking funny how all of a sudden we have a renault race team specialist appear from nowhere!
Seriously dude step away from the keyboard before you actualy start believing your own lies!
As for the supra... yeah it sucked and it got pwned!
Ive got an NA myself and there not exactly 'fast' but they are a great car to drive
mmmmmtasty 2 years ago
You seriously needd to research something before you express your pathetic opinion.
The VTS is 135 BHP per ton
The supra is 125 BHP per ton
You lose mate. .
PugMarshall2906 2 years ago
All N/A supra's should be crushed.
suzuki17dt 2 years ago 13
Comment removed
mmmmmtasty 2 years ago
Lol the funny part is you now own one yourself =P
mmmmmtasty 2 years ago
@suzuki17dt No, they should have huge turbos whacked onto them :P
D3s15 1 year ago
Comment removed
mmmmmtasty 2 years ago
lol bang on there vedubbya...vts are rapid, watch my vids, i got ones of me beating astra sri, vtr, supra etc etc lol
redmistedscorpio 2 years ago
umm n/a supra how poo!
villa2idie84 2 years ago
I think is not Turbo that supra and seems to you all too like automatic shift?
GrazG 2 years ago
Both these cars stock?
TheVtieg6 2 years ago
it s an N/A supra...
drbos 2 years ago
LOL i love 0:20 "Shiiiit......" LOVE IT
rf9193 2 years ago
lol nice one
JTV84 2 years ago
loose
gendi33 2 years ago
The saxo weighs 930kg and puts out 120bhp and the supra weighs 1557kg and has 184bhp (assuming both are stock). Also the supra must be 16+ years old.
VeDubbya 2 years ago