Thought many of you overlooked my comment. Let me say again. deafchipmunk asked us why they did? It is simple answer! ! ! Please look at AFA's vlog - "AFA Urged NAD Wake Up" dated on April 9, 2010. Definitely, NAD has held a grudge against Ruthie Jordan and AFA. They had waited for AFA's little mistaken action.
My guess is that NAD takes this against Ruthie Jordan personally for her straightforward message toward NAD by having her "Wake Up" vlog some years ago. I believe this is part of of their vendetta behavior against her.
Destruction of property should not happen. In Gally's case, the buses were not destroyed or defaced, just temporarily disabled (tires were not slashed, just the air let out). At AGB, the sign was not scratched, chipped or otherwise marred. The only potential problem could be some residue left over from the tape -- easily solved with some alcohol. Big ado about nothing!
@DrDonGCSUS Yes of course not damaging Gallaudet property. I don't think I said slashing bus tires and damaged buses... Just hot-wired and drove them to entry area and then deflated tires to prevent any outsider to enter Gallaudet. AFA blue tape situation is nothing by comparing to other activities. AFA had been advised by lawyer. Not a problem.
Well said, David. It's quite an interesting contradiction. Have people who supported and were involved in the two Gallaudet protests now become too complacent in comfortable positions, and become older and forgotten the lessons of history?
@shelpotma1 Yes some same person who kept retweeting NAD/Sean Gerlis was also involved in Gally Protests. Huh? That's why I don't get it. *shake head sad* They need to take their sticks out of their asses.
Well said! I shared this up in Facebook because I find this is too important to see the huge difference between AFA's rally and DPN's protest in regards of "deface". Great vlog!
Thought many of you overlooked my comment. Let me say again. deafchipmunk asked us why they did? It is simple answer! ! ! Please look at AFA's vlog - "AFA Urged NAD Wake Up" dated on April 9, 2010. Definitely, NAD has held a grudge against Ruthie Jordan and AFA. They had waited for AFA's little mistaken action.
ASLmeY 7 months ago
My guess is that NAD takes this against Ruthie Jordan personally for her straightforward message toward NAD by having her "Wake Up" vlog some years ago. I believe this is part of of their vendetta behavior against her.
ASLmeY 7 months ago
Destruction of property should not happen. In Gally's case, the buses were not destroyed or defaced, just temporarily disabled (tires were not slashed, just the air let out). At AGB, the sign was not scratched, chipped or otherwise marred. The only potential problem could be some residue left over from the tape -- easily solved with some alcohol. Big ado about nothing!
DrDonGCSUS 7 months ago
@DrDonGCSUS Yes of course not damaging Gallaudet property. I don't think I said slashing bus tires and damaged buses... Just hot-wired and drove them to entry area and then deflated tires to prevent any outsider to enter Gallaudet. AFA blue tape situation is nothing by comparing to other activities. AFA had been advised by lawyer. Not a problem.
deafchipmunk 7 months ago
well said!
jaboutdoors 7 months ago
@jaboutdoors thank you
deafchipmunk 7 months ago
Well said, David. It's quite an interesting contradiction. Have people who supported and were involved in the two Gallaudet protests now become too complacent in comfortable positions, and become older and forgotten the lessons of history?
shelpotma1 7 months ago
@shelpotma1 Yes some same person who kept retweeting NAD/Sean Gerlis was also involved in Gally Protests. Huh? That's why I don't get it. *shake head sad* They need to take their sticks out of their asses.
InsaneMisha 7 months ago
@shelpotma1 exactly! That is my argument. Thanks!
deafchipmunk 7 months ago
Don't Mess with Deaf Zulu! ----------->
DEADSILENCEDUDE 7 months ago
@DEADSILENCEDUDE what happened with Deaf Zulu? Does it apply to my vlog ? hummm
deafchipmunk 7 months ago
Well said! I shared this up in Facebook because I find this is too important to see the huge difference between AFA's rally and DPN's protest in regards of "deface". Great vlog!
InsaneMisha 7 months ago
@InsaneMisha thats right. deface can be defined differently. temporary or permanent are different. AFA activity is positive message
deafchipmunk 7 months ago
@deafchipmunk Exactly...that's why I put quotes on that deface because it's sightly different in definition.
InsaneMisha 7 months ago