chinese might be using this but they learnt it from India. This is vedic mathematics whose origin is from one of the vedas and more specifically "atharva veda".
this is not chinese way.this is old vedic way(ancient indians)...they invented zeros(woww), pythagorus, chess, surgery, various short cuts like this one.......and wat not........pls get ur information correct before postin anything.......
I think Vadic way (Ancient Indian) of multiplication is much faster and easier even when compared to traditional methods (and of course this one) we are used to...
Apart from the fact that this is just another way, this is a useless method. For one, what would you do for higher digits like 86 X 69, draw 29 lines? And also you probably would make a whole lot many mistakes counting so many intersections rather than multiply in a regular way.
@shinwari2006 u shud hav made dat clear dat by givin a more appropriate example, the example dat u gav (10 x 20) did not make ur point clear..... nd secondly, its not my fab method (i personally am not a big fan of dis way of multiplying nos. since i find it extremely time consuming)
@shinwari2006 - y the hell do u need to multiply zeros ?? cant u just take dem separately ?? as in to multiply the nos. - 120 x 410 cant u first multiply 12 x 41 and then add 2 0's to the answer ??
this is not that fast actually. it's the same concept as multiplying with a table, one number on top of the other, except this way you have to draw lines. BUT this way is definitely unique because it is more of a visual concept.
imagine you have a quiz and you have to do all that u probably wouldnt finish your quiz in time and i would definitely get confused with those lines and stuff
there's obviously faster ways of multiplying, but just the fact that there's another method of doing it by just using simple, little lines is extraordinary.
@elmersglue44 We in the West have removed the simple wasteful lines (probably inspired by their use of the abacus) and just deal with the digits directly. We're doing exactly the same comparison of every digit with every other digit, carrying the tens and lining up the digits in the correct columns and adding them up. It's all the same operations, just indicated graphically.
OK. Now try 79845 x 56977.
TomKaren1994 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i looked at this video, for about 10 seconds and thought 'nope, im too stupid'
:P
911BlackRose 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i looked at this video, for about 10 seconds and thought 'nope, im too stupid'
:P
911BlackRose 5 months ago
i looked at this video, for about 10 seconds and thought 'nope, im too stupid'
:P
911BlackRose 5 months ago
Comment removed
Spacehorse99 8 months ago
@Spacehorse99 its jus way followed in ancient days...
Hero768 7 months ago
@Spacehorse99 Really? Bring me some white guys who can do this in their head. Not in math, physics or engineering departments but off the street.
chosop25 6 months ago
Maybe this is only a coincidence, I tried solving 246x642 and it was a fail... Could you make a video how to solve it?
KuyaPenny 9 months ago
chinese might be using this but they learnt it from India. This is vedic mathematics whose origin is from one of the vedas and more specifically "atharva veda".
mkjaiswal100 9 months ago
DONT BE MISLEADING PEOPLE THATS THE WAY THE MAYANS MULTIPLY.
QueenReina2010 9 months ago
Cool... but wouldn't it be quicker to multiply it the old fashion way?
IanMarcias 10 months ago
i dont get it so ... fck it i just watched 8 seconds anyway
TheModernkillfare 1 year ago
it ok but the maths behing it is very simple and by doingwith numbers it is faster
sufman100 1 year ago
How could anyone dislike this?
Chankeypathak 1 year ago
This is The Vedic Method of India not the Chinese Method....
itsshivam 1 year ago
interesting except when you do:
989x988
so many intersections and if you are poor at drawing it really hurts you.
still cool though
TheDarkhorse8888 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS TECHNIQUE BELONGS TO INDIA
WE TEACH THE WORLD HOW TO COUNT
THAT'S WHY IAM NOT PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN BECAUSE
I AM PRODY , PROUDY VERY VERY PROUDY TO BE AN INDIAN
HINDI : MUJHE APNE BHARTITE HONE PAR " GHAMAND " HAI , THA AUR RAHEGA !
MKR7575 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THIS TECHNIQUE BELONGS TO INDIA
WE TEACH THE WORLD HOW TO COUNT
THAT'S WHY IAM NOT PROUD TO BE AN INDIAN BECAUSE
I AM PRODY , PROUDY VERY VERY PROUDY TO BE AN INDIAN
HINDI : MUJHE APNE BHARTITE HONE PAR " GHAMAND " HAI , THA AUR RAHEGA !
MKR7575 1 year ago
Comment removed
MKR7575 1 year ago
GENIUS
CullenHearts 1 year ago
lol azns
nao i kno ur sekret ;]
destroyallnerds 1 year ago
SPREAD the message...amaizing but... It's traditional INDIAN method of multiplying. It's called VEDIC MATHS. We cant let Chinese take our Royalty..
PrincessGawry 1 year ago 13
@PrincessGawry
Yup i agree my mistake..
i went thru after i uploaded.. :(
Hero768 1 year ago
amaizing but... It's traditional INDIAN method of multiplying. It's called VEDIC MATHS. We cant let Chinese take our Royalty..:):)
PrincessGawry 1 year ago
สุดยอดเลย น่าจะรู้วิธีนี้ตั้งนานแล้ว จะได้ใช้เวลาสอบได้
008vvv 1 year ago
PLS GOOGLE SEARCH "VEDIC MATHS" AND SEE AMAZING SHORT CUTS OF MATHEMATICS.........
forbidnapple 1 year ago
this is not chinese way.this is old vedic way(ancient indians)...they invented zeros(woww), pythagorus, chess, surgery, various short cuts like this one.......and wat not........pls get ur information correct before postin anything.......
forbidnapple 1 year ago 3
fucking brilliant!
tigersoup 1 year ago
I've always had trouble with multiplying (math has always been a hard subject for me) so this is really eye opening lol. Im really excited.
JennifersBox 1 year ago
I think Vadic way (Ancient Indian) of multiplication is much faster and easier even when compared to traditional methods (and of course this one) we are used to...
sachin1581 1 year ago
chuy ka?
oxxkayexxo15 1 year ago
Apart from the fact that this is just another way, this is a useless method. For one, what would you do for higher digits like 86 X 69, draw 29 lines? And also you probably would make a whole lot many mistakes counting so many intersections rather than multiply in a regular way.
TejasM14 1 year ago 2
@shinwari2006 u shud hav made dat clear dat by givin a more appropriate example, the example dat u gav (10 x 20) did not make ur point clear..... nd secondly, its not my fab method (i personally am not a big fan of dis way of multiplying nos. since i find it extremely time consuming)
gsaharan1990 1 year ago
@shinwari2006 - y the hell do u need to multiply zeros ?? cant u just take dem separately ?? as in to multiply the nos. - 120 x 410 cant u first multiply 12 x 41 and then add 2 0's to the answer ??
gsaharan1990 1 year ago
it will not work when you multiply an odd number with an even number or vice versa...
gr8venky 1 year ago
You just have to put all the zeros in the end. I think...
justRel 1 year ago
I viewed this video in class and was told this was the Mayan way to multiply...?
RiseToOffend 2 years ago
cool
sweetcherry77 2 years ago
that dudes got some cool handwriting, for numbers at least
w00tix 2 years ago
how do you know where to draw the dotted line (semi circle)
anddd how dow you know whic number u add the 1 (when you carry it over)
k40290 2 years ago
I am retarded and didn't get it :-(
suripopje 2 years ago
how do you divide??? using this method??????
775evelyn 2 years ago
this is not that fast actually. it's the same concept as multiplying with a table, one number on top of the other, except this way you have to draw lines. BUT this way is definitely unique because it is more of a visual concept.
XDarkstarZX 2 years ago
Chinese do not count that way, i can easily solve the first few sums without trying.
noobestofdamall 2 years ago
that's to much
imagine you have a quiz and you have to do all that u probably wouldnt finish your quiz in time and i would definitely get confused with those lines and stuff
lorraine246 2 years ago
imagine the teacher like wtf with you lines XD
LUSIANO1994 2 years ago 14
Ahh id think id rather use my calculator..
xDalyssaDx 2 years ago
oh man!!!! cool thanks
jsheehan100 2 years ago
I'm so bad at maths so i'm deffenatly trying this
EMHcybertron 2 years ago
there's obviously faster ways of multiplying, but just the fact that there's another method of doing it by just using simple, little lines is extraordinary.
elmersglue44 2 years ago 14
that's true, but it's still just amazing how the numbers just turn out the way they do.
Just go further and think of how the old cultures may have known other tricks of math that we don't know.
Imprezziveness 2 years ago 3
@elmersglue44 We in the West have removed the simple wasteful lines (probably inspired by their use of the abacus) and just deal with the digits directly. We're doing exactly the same comparison of every digit with every other digit, carrying the tens and lining up the digits in the correct columns and adding them up. It's all the same operations, just indicated graphically.
Dracopol 1 year ago
What about 999x9999 ?
feldsliscia 2 years ago
meh. I definitely do it faster without drawing lines. Actually there isn't anything special in the calculations, just the pretty lines...
l0rdbulb 2 years ago
pretty cool, but it takes a long time. there are much easier ways of doing multiplication!
shakitty1 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
Great vid, view my channel and be my friend. Thank you.
Take care.
FreeTrafficSystems 2 years ago
Woow, really smart
mena3agram 2 years ago