Ph.D. from Louisiana Baptist University... unaccredited theologically conservative Christian university,
A Los Angeles Times article reported that Missler and co-author Hal Lindsey had plagiarized a portion of Miami University Professor Edwin Yamauchi's 1982 book Foes From the Northern Frontier in their own 1992 book The Magog Factor. This guy is just full of shit, oops ...peanut butter!!
I only have ONE very simple request- the first person to do it gets 69 $million$ from Obama Trump. Create life from non-living matter-ANY matter you want to in any combination! Told you that you couldn't!! Ha ha, I will never have to pay a living soul one dime!!!!!
@pinball281 it doesn't, however that argument doesn't strengthen the claim that there is only one god in fact it tears it apart because it opens the doors to say well if lack of evidence isn't evidence of absence then everything supernatural including all gods past and present cannot be discounted and to do so would make a christian a hypocrite
@bigmanoooo1 yeah well im not a christian and what we dont know or see we dont know or see,we can only assume so to all the people out there saying theres no evidence for god,NO SHIT.Work it out,if there is a god then this is a test,maybe we are spiritual beings havinga physical experience.I know one thing tho there is a lot of end times talk at the moment and the arrival of the anti-christ and second coming of jesus and you know what i think theres some truth to it.
@pinball281 people believe in god because they want him to exists for various reasons, mostly because they want heaven to be real, and regarding the end of time talks, that is nothing new people have always envisioned their own demise its human nature we are very self destructive creatures that's why we are the only ones that commit suicide and even those who dont actively kill themselves are self destructive in other ways
This is funny peanut butter is basicly dead peanuts and only decomposers can live in dead objects.(Yes humans live and sit on dead things too example,wood)
Not to mention that "h. s. sapiens" existed at the same time as the neanderthal man. The idea is, is that, just as people today are classified into "races" because of their ethnic background and phenotype appearance, scientifically there is NO such thing as an actual "race". "Race" is a concrete social stratification in sociology, but in science it is an abstract fallacy. Likewise, evolutionary biologists today use these "stratifications" in fossils. The fallacy is when classifying is attempted.
The fact is, if something had jumped out of that peanut butter jar, a creature never seen before, he would not have said "omg, God does not exist after all!"
He would have simply said.. "See? God just created a new, never seen before creature, put it in this jar only to prove his own existence. Now, was I right, or was i right?"
I mean there is somewhat of a valid principle presented in the video though. For example, if evolution were a true theory, how come all monkeys haven't "evolved" into people yet? How come they haven't "evolved" into any new species throughout the history of science? Because it is a THEORY, NOT a LAW. Meaning, it hasn't been proven, even throughout the whole entire history of science, over years and years, it cannot be proven. Why? Because it's a myth. The speciation of creatures happens, not ev.
@roxtar55 No. humans didn't evolve from monkeys, humans and monkeys share a common ancestor, meaning that monkeys are evolved forms of the same creature that humans evolved from. Monkeys and humans are just different branches of a common creature. One is not necessarily better than the other. Monkeys are better suited to live in their environment and humans in theirs. Do you see where im going with this? And proof that evolution is true does exist such as fossils of human-like apes. No myth
@therewillbemud Well you are somewhat of the conservative evolutionist. Not quite as radical as some. Fossils of human-like apes are often misconcepted in their artistic interpretations. For example, Neanderthals are just another "race" - like caucasoids, negroids, mongoloids, etc. Not to mention that carbon dating is actually not the best way to measure the date of an object. This is because there is no way to measure weathering and erosion. Calculating population is the best measurement.
@roxtar55 neanderthals were not just another race of human they were a completely different genus. If you look at the skeletons of a black man and a white man you would not be able to tell which was which. However neanderthals had smaller skulls and brain, shorter frame, and voice boxes incapable of speech. It's true that some ethnicities today have adapted differently such as skin tone and facial features but these differences are insignificant when compared to those of a neanderthal
@therewillbemud Yes you can tell the difference between caucasoids and negroid skulls. Very blatant statement there. FBI forensics use this to help identify people. The theory of their capabilities, is, well, a "theory". Just as you cannot tell the specific internal features of dinosaurs, same goes for humans. Fossils do not reveal much about internal organs, especially abdominal organs. Conclusions can be made about the size, but not functionality from just calcium deposits.
here is a simple example of evolution: u get sick, take some pills and stop taking them after a while (the sickness is not fully cured), after the virus recovers it might grow immunity to certain dosage of the medicine. that's evolution
though please remember, unlike a lot of religious stories or in most cases what would be more aptly called a myth, a theory is something that is based almost purely on proven fact
a lot of creationists and anti-evolutionists have this idea that theory = hypothesis
that is not the case, and they need to understand this
theory of evolution basically means truth of evolution
@hxcnoah Yeah...I'm not rly sure if you replied to what you meant to, as what you said was a complete non-sequitur. Anyway, to clarify I support the theory of evolution, the comment i posted was to deter creationists from using the peanut butter argument because they would be attacking abiogenesis rather than evolution.
I assumed this was a copy of the original haha.. Guess I was wrong. I love the bit about the pre-opening/checking of the peanut butter jar becasue clearly someone was paranoid that there might be life in there. I'm not kidding when I say that's exactly what I thought when I to saw the original....it's sick man xD
I find it funny that these Theist instead believe that man came from a rib and that there are talking snakes, and Moses walked on water. Theist are the biggest hypocrites ever. The stupidity makes me cry.
Prove it wrong then.... Oh, you cant! I forgot, that when Evolutionists resort to mocking and mimiking creationists, it is the sign that they have no idea, or response and are completely stumped.. Completely out of their depth!.. That is why people like Dawkins, because he mocks and can make ignorant people laugh, NOT because his preaching has ANY substance at all...
I Love The Rising Of New Atheists In The World And It's Funny Cause The Bible Say's The Last Generation On Earth Will Completely Reject Jesus Before His Second Coming. You All Should Read Bible Prophecy And Find Out The Truth. God Isn't Going To Offer His Love Forever.
Ok someone please tell me what magic little liquid can make intelligent life spontaniously form. And tell me where is this liquid today and why is it not still making life? If you insult me than I will have you suspended, please just give me a scientifical anwer to this question.
You silly, silly atheist, I will pray to God for you to forgive him. You are a fool and you are blind to the truth of jesus. I am now on my knees praying for Him to forgive you. You poor, dumb, fool.
@myteethareshiny well you see I assumed that he was making fun of atheists because he also said "why is there still dirt" and since it says in the bible that god made only one man from dirt that wouldn't make sense
lol, you know even if i wanted to to take you seriously a sarcastic person like u it is not to been taken seriously because your logic and mind is not working properly.
so, when u will be a person who will made a video for udults and not for brats under 10, i will watch it and think about it.
And yet from peanut butter, there has been the genesis of both sandwiches (with and without jam) AND Reeses peanut butter cups - thereby demonstrating evolution. QED
If you're a fundy who believes life not growing in a peanut butter jar disproves evolution, and that name calling is an appropriate response, no reply is necessary, and no further ones will be made to you by me!
you stupid making life in peanut butter is far easier than on a completely sterile world. .................dumass peanut butter has all the elements of life.
Just the small reply that your response deserves. Spell check. Read a book. Realize somehow that name calling isn't an argument. And, don't bother replying back because I'll just delete you.
you're the kind of asshole that will defend piltdown man or lucy.....nothing but a disgruntled homosexual. tell me why a dead sterile planet is more conducive to life than peanut butter, which already has
all the elements of life? tell me assmuncher. lets hear the science you unwiped asshole
you won't you can't...all you are is another militant queer trying to convince people that there is no GOD...SO THAT YOUR PERVERSIONS CAN BE soooooomeday
@rddaos Yes there is. The proof is that I can answer the question of "why are we here?" and "where did this all come from?". Instead of being like you, which would be the making of excuses.
@rddaos Define evidence. If you are talking in "typical" terms, if I may, there is physical proof. For example, as I have peronally experienced first hand, is the prescence of demons. Spiritual creatures, often misinterpretted as paranormal "poltergeists", or "ghosts". In actuality, these are demons. To reiterate, once again, I have experienced such phenomena in the past. Honestly, I have tried, but no evolutionary biologist can give me an explanation. The Bible is a historical work of science.
have you considered the possibility that you are mentally ill? have you considered that you might be schizophrenic? hearing voices? seeing things? invisible creatures? magical fairies? elves? hobbits?
@rddaos Have you ever considered that you are insane? Believing evolution is like believing the world was flat back in the day. But when the proof comes, it'll hit the unbelievers hard, just like it did when they discovered the Earth was a sphere. Walk by faith, not by sight.
Evolution is a scientific fact, while religion is fantasy that is supported by no evidence. Have you ever considered medication to help you stop hearing voices from the invisible man in the sky?
@rddaos Scientific "fact"? Wow, way off there bubba. Scientific "theory" is the technical term. Have you ever considered mathematics? Because, if you have, which is quite unlikely considering your ignorance, you would find that evolutionary theory does not coincide with mathematics. However, your ignorance prevents you from seeing two sides of anything. Meaning, you are an atheist, but not an evolutionist.
evolution (aka modern biology) is a fact of science as confirmed by every biology department at every major university. however, i've never met a jesus freak who had the slightest idea about what evolution science even says. you see, every jesus freak i've ever met has approximately a 2nd grade understanding of evolution. if you're interesting in learning about science, just ask and i'll be your teacher.
@rddaos Well I guess that makes a prejudicial, stereotyping bigot (as expected). But, no thanks, I already know more on evolutionary theology apparently more than you, so I'll pass on that one.
"Scientific fact? Wow, way off there bubba. Scientific theory is the technical term."
- evolution is a fact when discussing the past and a theory in regard to it's predictive power.
- a SCIENTIFIC THEORY is a well evidenced and thoroughly tested principle that explains a set of facts
"Have you ever considered mathematics? Because, if you have...you would find that evolutionary theory does not coincide with mathematics" - this is simply incorrect.
@types10000 "Bubba?" Okay, epic fail right there. It's funny you say this because if all theory was true, then there would be some crazy things going on in the world right now. But then again..... I seem to be growing a pair of wings..... so I guess we're starting to see "Homo Ptises?" Rofl. Mathematics is an athiest's worst nightmare. If humans existed 500,000 years ago, our population would be over a nonillion.
"Okay, epic fail right there. It's funny you say this because if all theory was true, then there would be some crazy things going on in the world right now."
- such as? every element of evolution can be observed.
"growing a pair of wings" - why would a human who (thanks to society) is subject to virtually no selective pressures at all undergoe a radical change; much less grow wings.
"Mathematics is an athiest's worst nightmare" - you keep asserting that but fail to evidence.
"If humans existed 500,000 years ago, our population would be over a nonillion"
- why?
population growth for any animal is dependent on the resources available; mainly food.
the biggest factor affecting human population growth was been agriculture which has only been around for the past 10,000 years.
prior to this humans lived in nomadic tribes whose population growth would likely model the same as undisturbed animal populations of today ie. RELATIVE STABILITY.
@types10000 But there is not a single equation to date the first humas being 300,000 years ago. And another thing to point out is that there are artifacts dated at about 300,000 years ago, when they still contain carbon-14! How can that be? Carbon-14 has a maximum life span of 100,000 years. So how could something be 300,000 or 500,000 years old if it contains carbon-14? It can't. A hematologist will tell you the same.
Because the universe was in a quantum state before the big bang, it adheres to the quantum uncertainty principle. There can be NO SUCH THING AS NOTHING in this universe as long as the generation of energy via virtualparticle pairs does not violate the law of energy conservation; it requires no miracle or supernatural act to create the energy in the universe.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
1. "you're not doing Christendom any favors" hahahahaha You're SOOO fkkkking funny SUDDENLY YOU WANT CHRISTIANS TO LOOK GOOD, YOU HYPOCRITE! Suddenly you're begging for the Saints to come to aid your atheist ass while any other time you'd be yelling about the 'Crusades' and the 'Inquisition' and how horrible Christians are. But now
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
2. it's, "You're just making Christians look like hypocritical, hate filled monsters" HAHAHAHAHAHAAAaaa Isn't that what you usually call us asshole? So now it's ANY stick you can grab with this little jewel, "As you can see, Christian apologetics aren't what they used to be." hahahahahaha You just forgot about the Crusades? hahahaha ya know yer a real example of a fucking asshole atheist. Thanks for revealing yourself to the whole world you cheapshot mother fucker.
"It's what many people call Christians and you're busy proving them right." OH......FUCK......YOU, I GIVE A SHIT AND it looks like you haven't had enough. Your mom said that you always have to have the last word like a little girl. I proved you a fucking liar and a pervert, now you think somebody is listening to you? hahahahahahaa BTW I am having fun are you? NOW Stand up for us and say something else stupid you little piece of shitwad.
It's what many people call Christians" MANY PEOPLE? hahahahaha you mean atheists, perverts, goat fuckers, pig humpers, child molestors, rapers of women and other homo types, right?
LoL censor everything there pal and lie just like china does. This video is fucking gay and doctored in order to try and make a joke out of somebody opinion by giving them goofy voice overs. The voice actor is clearly a fucking idiot.
It's offensive is it? Creationists are allowed to made rediculous arguements to affirm god's existance and denounce athiests but the second an athiest points out how stupid their arguement is it's offensive.
Their opinion SHOULD be joked at, because in the original video he has no idea firstly of what evolution is and secondly of the current scientific theory for the beginning of life (abiogenesis, NOT EVOLUTION!).
huronwarriors. You are a fool, plain and simple. What this creationist huxter is saying does not prove any kind of flaw in the theory of evolution. He is not even talking about evolution, he is talking about abiogenesis. Just another testament to the fact that creationists and christians do not know a damn thing about the natural world.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Ok I would really like to point out that you atheists really need to stop turning the argument around, the guy is saying that evolution says due to energy and other conditions which make life sustainable, we should be seeing new species coming up out of no where. He's saying in the original video that this is why evolution doesn't exist, not this is why God doesn't exist. So back up your arguement or shut your mouths and agree that this is a flaw in the theory. Don't turn this around on God
"evolution says due to energy and other conditions which make life sustainable, we should be seeing new species coming up out of no where"
See, that's the problem. Evolution says no such thing. Gross ignorance may be attractive to you sky-fairy imaginers, but to us logical sciencey folk, it's disgusting.
Also check Genesis - THAT is the one that says new species come out of nowhere. Well, from a wave of the holy magic wand, at least. Abracadabra, and there was light! And trees! And peanuts!
you say that there is less chance for spontaneous generation of life, now that the planet is covered with life, than there was when there was no life at all?
I'm guessing you're referrring to an earlier comment I made, because I don't say that here.
Anyway it's true. Life now everywhere. From the atomsphere to the rocks. One thing life likes to do is eat the stuff that other life (as we know it) is made from. The complexity required for a basic living thing wouldn't have a chance to come into being before being eaten.
But that's nothing to do wih evolution anyway. Perhaps I should just make some shit up and talk about peanut butter instead.
Who says it only happened once? Provide evidence of it only happeneing once before you can ask that.
Anyway there are clueless retards (i.e. creationists) who believe that evolution = frogs and lemurs and dinosaurs spontaneously appearing in peanut butter. This is utter bollocks that could only happen via magic wand-waving sky faries. Science says fuck all about "spontaneous" generation of life for exactly that reason - it's the kind of fantasy tripe you get in books of fables - e.g. the bible.
organic molecules are eaten up immediately by microorganisms. very little chance for spontaneous generation of life in today's world. also, unlike when life first appeared on earth, the atmosphere is now oxidizing, which destroys organic molecules.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
raty
dickie dawkins to ben stein
"It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved by probably some kind of Darwinian means to a very, very high level of technology— and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. And I suppose its possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer.
Good point. It was really vile of Stein to take that quote out of context. When you see the uncensored video you see that Dawkins was making fun of the idea of an outside creator, yet Stein twisted his words around to make it sound like he was ADVOCATING the idea of aliens creating mankind.
I'm glad you're starting to see just how much flat out lying creationists do to support their claims.
HalleysAsshole said, "When you see the uncensored video you see that Dawkins was making fun of the idea of an outside creator" You're full of shit. You're mom SAID you're a liar. This proves it. "yet Stein twisted his words around to make it sound like he was ADVOCATING the idea of aliens creating mankind" You're liar one more time. Now tell me how Stein twisted his words?
Ladies and gentlemen, allow me to present YouLoseAsshole, youtube's 21st century equivalent to St Thomas Aquinas or C. S. Lewis. As you can see, Christian apologetics aren't what they used to be.
fine, here is how i back up my no-god argument, carbon dating shows the earth is billions of years old,some stars are so far away, that the light we see from them is millions of yeas old, the summerians invented glue 7000 years ago, 1000 years before the supposed christian creation, now, we know since ancient times people have created myths to explain nature, from aztec to greek, to modern christianity, which basically ripped off all pagan religions, religion is obsolete except for simple minded
wow, showing some christina love there, well we don't believe it all came from nothing, galaxies are moving away from each other, which evidence points to an explosion from which all matter was once condensed, the big bang theory, now we don't know where this original matter came from, but saying, "god did it" answers absolutely nothing, and sets us back to an age where ignorance was accepted because it was simpler, the regressive argument only poses the question, then who made god?
@JackPhelpswho Your comment is so well done, I wonder if you meant "christian love" or whether "christina love" was your real intention. I find both are valid. Lol!
@JackPhelpswho If there was a time where there is absolutely nothing in existence at all... nothing can possibly come from nothing. Take a building 4 example. That building did not decied to build itself 1day it must of had help to be constructed. So think of the universe as a building, it must of had help to be here. Since things do exist! There4, there could never have been absolutely nothing, something had to have always been in existence b4 anything else. Sry, I wud have been more detailed.
you do......an atheist has to believe that all things came from nothing at all......or you have to believe someone made it.....your hero dickie dawkins told ben stien that aliens did it.....hahahahaha!!!
no, i do not believe a magical invisible man in the sky came from nothing and created himself and now he grants wishes to those who kiss his ass. This is what creationists believe.
Nooo it's the creationist bimbos who think a magical sky fairy created himself out of nothing and made the universe. This is not my stupid belief system, it's the creationists'.
"your hero dickie dawkins told ben stien that aliens did it"
Try watching the uncensored version. You can see that Dawkins was making fun of the idea of aliens creating life on Earth, and he want on to explain that even THAT idea only moves the question of where life came from to another planet.
Stein's dishonesty really shines through in how he used that clip.
If you have to invoke a magical super being who always existed and had no beginning in time, yet provides no tangible evidence of its existence, why not cut the mysticism out of the loop and assume the matter in the universe always existed?
HalleysAsshole, you're a lowlife fucking scumbag mutherfukker. Even your own mom hates your sorry ass. She says you're a useless no good little bastard. She is bereaved that you have turned out to be a fucking queer. She thinks your uncle is responsible for it. She can't quite put her thumb on when you started taking it up the ass. She said she even caught you sucking the dog's dick for crying out loud.
She said her first inclination was when she caught you blowing the trash-men. She said she hopes you get hit by a truck or something. She claims that she's never known a more disgusting creep in her whole life. She said you're just like your father.
Seriously, you're not doing Christendom any favors by spewing raw unfiltered hate like that. You're just making Christians look like hypocritical, hate filled monsters incapable of rational thought.
Hahhahahahahahaaa Look at the bully crying and wailing. Somebody just kicked him in the balls and now it's wah wah wah wah wah Well ya little chickenshit pervert asshole FUCK YOU! So you don't like it when you get some of your own shit back. Why didn't you tell me that I should be acting like an atheist? HUH? "You're a deep cover liberal, aren't you?" Great comeback you pussy. Now go whine to your mommy before you get some more you fucking piece of dog shit.
You didn't see shit asshole. Your mom says you have a little bitty pee pee and all you do is play with it. She says you're fkking pervert and a liar who nobody believes.
Some heretics falsly believe that the bible was written by god himself and therefore was literally god's word.
They deny that the evangelists were mere human beings and the works of only 4 out of more than 80 were admitted to contribute to "the book of books" by vote in early conciliums.
This attitude produced the absurd idea that earth was only 6000 years old, based on a calculation made by "bible scientists" involving Noah's age of 950 years.
Prick maybe......Stupid no. Having to resort to calling me a prick in light of your lack of intelligence makes you the prick. Your belief in magic also makes you a retard.
No such thing as an atheist....... well I agree with you there. Only grown ups and intellectually honest people who reject the truth of fairy tales. Don't think we need to be labelled Atheist any more than we need to be called Afairyist or Agoblinist.
So where did god make us from bright lad? Nothing maybe. He just magicked us into existence. Where did god come from? From nothing maybe? Don't make the grown ups laugh.
Eh I don't mind the title atheist for now, because of the current minority status overall, and especially in Turkey and the U.S. among more developed countries. Unlike agoblinist. But eventually, hopefully this title will become useless, like afairyist. :P
liars? and you say that based on what? I am clueless about physics because I went to business school. Market research is my thing... but, I graduated from a jesuit High school and college... had lots of bible study and because I understand it, I know jesus is no god!!! if he ever existed, he could not save shit. Then again, you are free to believe in the cosmic zombi seating on top of the moon ... by the way, how much do you contribute monetary to ur pastor?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
i see you hate Jesus sooooo you know which God is the true God....no sense hating Gaia or Brahama...you just proved you are a Godhater and not an atheist.
you are very very angery so that seals the truth of what i say......now asshole tell me how nothing makes something.
hate jesus? how the fuck do you get your "facts"? I do not believe in jesus as a god. I have no clue if he did exist as a man, as a god, he is just as worthless as gaia, quetzalcoatl, thor, etc. I cannot hate something that I don´t believe it exists. asshole? where the fuck is your xtian love? hypocrite!! Something from nothing? simple, asshole god said: let it be light, plants, etc. something from nothing is YOUR version. Ask Copperfield, he uses the same technique as ur god: MAGIC
The same way the nothing made your god or the same way your god made us from nothing. I'm not sure to be honest (neither is anyone else) but I would bet its more likely the nothingness you speak of created some simple Hydrogen rather than a diety.
People don't want to believe God used evolution or some automatic process because they want to believe they are specially select beings.
myshakenbaken 4 weeks ago
The caption writer can't speell :)
dirtydonki 3 months ago
Ph.D. from Louisiana Baptist University... unaccredited theologically conservative Christian university,
A Los Angeles Times article reported that Missler and co-author Hal Lindsey had plagiarized a portion of Miami University Professor Edwin Yamauchi's 1982 book Foes From the Northern Frontier in their own 1992 book The Magog Factor. This guy is just full of shit, oops ...peanut butter!!
oregonsheepherder 7 months ago
Interesting, American creationists speaking with British voices.
Akira625 7 months ago
@Orca40 if there are christians around,why are there still atheists? ;)
Elspethknighterrant 7 months ago
@Orca40 if people came from apes,why there are still apes?;)
Elspethknighterrant 7 months ago
@Elspethknighterrant cuz they are a different species and arn't all evolved yet.
MrKoiking1 6 months ago
@MrKoiking1 they had plenty of time to evolve.they are evolved they the way they are now
Elspethknighterrant 6 months ago
This guy is a crock
universalmusac 10 months ago 2
I only have ONE very simple request- the first person to do it gets 69 $million$ from Obama Trump. Create life from non-living matter-ANY matter you want to in any combination! Told you that you couldn't!! Ha ha, I will never have to pay a living soul one dime!!!!!
IronHorsez88 10 months ago
@IronHorsez88 You don't read the news, do you?
bbc.co.uk/news/10132762
i'm sure they'll accept a check.
lo2enge 10 months ago
@IronHorsez88
Depending on your version of "life" it already happened.
Londron 10 months ago
"SINCE WHEN DOES ABSCENCE OF EVIDENCE EQUATE TO EVIDENCE OF ABSCENCE"
pinball281 11 months ago
@pinball281 it doesn't, however that argument doesn't strengthen the claim that there is only one god in fact it tears it apart because it opens the doors to say well if lack of evidence isn't evidence of absence then everything supernatural including all gods past and present cannot be discounted and to do so would make a christian a hypocrite
bigmanoooo1 11 months ago
@bigmanoooo1 yeah well im not a christian and what we dont know or see we dont know or see,we can only assume so to all the people out there saying theres no evidence for god,NO SHIT.Work it out,if there is a god then this is a test,maybe we are spiritual beings havinga physical experience.I know one thing tho there is a lot of end times talk at the moment and the arrival of the anti-christ and second coming of jesus and you know what i think theres some truth to it.
pinball281 11 months ago
@pinball281 people believe in god because they want him to exists for various reasons, mostly because they want heaven to be real, and regarding the end of time talks, that is nothing new people have always envisioned their own demise its human nature we are very self destructive creatures that's why we are the only ones that commit suicide and even those who dont actively kill themselves are self destructive in other ways
bigmanoooo1 11 months ago
This is funny peanut butter is basicly dead peanuts and only decomposers can live in dead objects.(Yes humans live and sit on dead things too example,wood)
Mrofthems 1 year ago
This is the SECOND VERSION! The FIRST TIME he opened that jar Einstein popped out and they had to do it all over again.
aditzzaaa 1 year ago
@Orca40 How come that dirt hasn't "evolved" yet?
roxtar55 1 year ago
Not to mention that "h. s. sapiens" existed at the same time as the neanderthal man. The idea is, is that, just as people today are classified into "races" because of their ethnic background and phenotype appearance, scientifically there is NO such thing as an actual "race". "Race" is a concrete social stratification in sociology, but in science it is an abstract fallacy. Likewise, evolutionary biologists today use these "stratifications" in fossils. The fallacy is when classifying is attempted.
roxtar55 1 year ago
The fact is, if something had jumped out of that peanut butter jar, a creature never seen before, he would not have said "omg, God does not exist after all!"
He would have simply said.. "See? God just created a new, never seen before creature, put it in this jar only to prove his own existence. Now, was I right, or was i right?"
cbbatista 1 year ago
I mean there is somewhat of a valid principle presented in the video though. For example, if evolution were a true theory, how come all monkeys haven't "evolved" into people yet? How come they haven't "evolved" into any new species throughout the history of science? Because it is a THEORY, NOT a LAW. Meaning, it hasn't been proven, even throughout the whole entire history of science, over years and years, it cannot be proven. Why? Because it's a myth. The speciation of creatures happens, not ev.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55 No. humans didn't evolve from monkeys, humans and monkeys share a common ancestor, meaning that monkeys are evolved forms of the same creature that humans evolved from. Monkeys and humans are just different branches of a common creature. One is not necessarily better than the other. Monkeys are better suited to live in their environment and humans in theirs. Do you see where im going with this? And proof that evolution is true does exist such as fossils of human-like apes. No myth
therewillbemud 1 year ago
@therewillbemud Well you are somewhat of the conservative evolutionist. Not quite as radical as some. Fossils of human-like apes are often misconcepted in their artistic interpretations. For example, Neanderthals are just another "race" - like caucasoids, negroids, mongoloids, etc. Not to mention that carbon dating is actually not the best way to measure the date of an object. This is because there is no way to measure weathering and erosion. Calculating population is the best measurement.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55 neanderthals were not just another race of human they were a completely different genus. If you look at the skeletons of a black man and a white man you would not be able to tell which was which. However neanderthals had smaller skulls and brain, shorter frame, and voice boxes incapable of speech. It's true that some ethnicities today have adapted differently such as skin tone and facial features but these differences are insignificant when compared to those of a neanderthal
therewillbemud 1 year ago
@therewillbemud Yes you can tell the difference between caucasoids and negroid skulls. Very blatant statement there. FBI forensics use this to help identify people. The theory of their capabilities, is, well, a "theory". Just as you cannot tell the specific internal features of dinosaurs, same goes for humans. Fossils do not reveal much about internal organs, especially abdominal organs. Conclusions can be made about the size, but not functionality from just calcium deposits.
roxtar55 1 year ago
Miller Urey expirment. Thats all I have to say.
slightlyhairy 1 year ago
Imagine there's not just one jar of peanut butter.
Imagine that there is an entire planet covered in peanut butter.
Imagine that there's about thirty billion of these planets.
Imagine that each of these planets had existed for billions of years.
That's a lot of peanut butter.
And that's a lot of time.
The Universe is a lot older and a lot larger than a month-old jar of peanut butter.
In something that mind-boggingly huge and ancient, strange and incredible accidents happen all the time.
DrunkenPoetic 1 year ago
here is a simple example of evolution: u get sick, take some pills and stop taking them after a while (the sickness is not fully cured), after the virus recovers it might grow immunity to certain dosage of the medicine. that's evolution
72dew 1 year ago
Believe what you want. Just keep this out of the public schools.
864208642 1 year ago
Yeah...evolution doesn't say ANYTHING about the origin of life. Rather, it explains the process of decent with modification.
SAFtejat 1 year ago
@SAFtejat exactly they are two different theories
though please remember, unlike a lot of religious stories or in most cases what would be more aptly called a myth, a theory is something that is based almost purely on proven fact
a lot of creationists and anti-evolutionists have this idea that theory = hypothesis
that is not the case, and they need to understand this
theory of evolution basically means truth of evolution
hxcnoah 1 year ago
@hxcnoah Yeah...I'm not rly sure if you replied to what you meant to, as what you said was a complete non-sequitur. Anyway, to clarify I support the theory of evolution, the comment i posted was to deter creationists from using the peanut butter argument because they would be attacking abiogenesis rather than evolution.
SAFtejat 1 year ago
@SAFtejat .
the first forms of life evolved into others that evolved into others and the process continues until who knows when, this is how life came to earth
Biguspikned 1 year ago
the opening argument denounced the god fairy tale.
looking at these weak and screwed claims i can tell the people making this video either dont know or ignore the experiments used for abiogenesis.
faithisuneducated 1 year ago
*FACEPALM*
atomicwarrus 1 year ago 2
I assumed this was a copy of the original haha.. Guess I was wrong. I love the bit about the pre-opening/checking of the peanut butter jar becasue clearly someone was paranoid that there might be life in there. I'm not kidding when I say that's exactly what I thought when I to saw the original....it's sick man xD
lordabomity 1 year ago
I find it funny that these Theist instead believe that man came from a rib and that there are talking snakes, and Moses walked on water. Theist are the biggest hypocrites ever. The stupidity makes me cry.
sean00fl 1 year ago
Prove it wrong then.... Oh, you cant! I forgot, that when Evolutionists resort to mocking and mimiking creationists, it is the sign that they have no idea, or response and are completely stumped.. Completely out of their depth!.. That is why people like Dawkins, because he mocks and can make ignorant people laugh, NOT because his preaching has ANY substance at all...
SuperJimbob1980 1 year ago
I Love The Rising Of New Atheists In The World And It's Funny Cause The Bible Say's The Last Generation On Earth Will Completely Reject Jesus Before His Second Coming. You All Should Read Bible Prophecy And Find Out The Truth. God Isn't Going To Offer His Love Forever.
AndoodJames 1 year ago
Ok someone please tell me what magic little liquid can make intelligent life spontaniously form. And tell me where is this liquid today and why is it not still making life? If you insult me than I will have you suspended, please just give me a scientifical anwer to this question.
MissKatRob 1 year ago
Brilliant!
wollin20 1 year ago
All I can say is this is a classic!
uncleboring 1 year ago
You silly, silly atheist, I will pray to God for you to forgive him. You are a fool and you are blind to the truth of jesus. I am now on my knees praying for Him to forgive you. You poor, dumb, fool.
ClythiaMystica 1 year ago
@ClythiaMystica Please pray for me?
Atheisticwiccan 1 year ago
@ClythiaMystica and pray for me too.. it will give you something to do!!
uncleboring 1 year ago
Chuck missler thinks that UFO's might be shape-shifting demons!
lol.
I think that explains enough about Missler to discount any of his 'Scientific Expermients" he conducts every 3 seconds of the year.
LOL. Is creationist the new political correct term for the word MORON?
shadowpirate100 1 year ago
prayer: how to do nothing and still think your helping
warlord2080 1 year ago
"by praying really REALLY hard..."
whydie666 1 year ago 2
@Orca40 um nobody says people came from dirt
BlackBeard716 1 year ago
@BlackBeard716 except christians
kyagh 1 year ago
@BlackBeard716 Actually, I'm pretty sure that the Bible claims God made man out of the dust of the ground. That's dirt.
Anyone who believes the Genesis account, believes that people came from dirt.
myteethareshiny 1 year ago
@myteethareshiny well you see I assumed that he was making fun of atheists because he also said "why is there still dirt" and since it says in the bible that god made only one man from dirt that wouldn't make sense
BlackBeard716 1 year ago
@BlackBeard716 Whatever. This topic is so stupid, that we really shouldn't be arguing about it.
And yeah, I guess I can understand what you were saying.
myteethareshiny 1 year ago
lol, you know even if i wanted to to take you seriously a sarcastic person like u it is not to been taken seriously because your logic and mind is not working properly.
so, when u will be a person who will made a video for udults and not for brats under 10, i will watch it and think about it.
charisaob 1 year ago
hahaha your videos are hilarious make more
BlackBeard716 1 year ago
And yet from peanut butter, there has been the genesis of both sandwiches (with and without jam) AND Reeses peanut butter cups - thereby demonstrating evolution. QED
r3ddruid 1 year ago
Does the guy in the video know that living organism took billions of years to develop ? It didn't happen in peanut butter neither, but in water.
Theism is a "rationnal" belief, so to speak. But creationism is plain stupid.
Quartrez 1 year ago
If you're a fundy who believes life not growing in a peanut butter jar disproves evolution, and that name calling is an appropriate response, no reply is necessary, and no further ones will be made to you by me!
SuperImready 1 year ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@SuperImready
@SuperImready
you stupid making life in peanut butter is far easier than on a completely sterile world. .................dumass peanut butter has all the elements of life.
shotforbrains
moogoogaipancake 1 year ago
Just the small reply that your response deserves. Spell check. Read a book. Realize somehow that name calling isn't an argument. And, don't bother replying back because I'll just delete you.
SuperImready 1 year ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Superfagready
you're the kind of asshole that will defend piltdown man or lucy.....nothing but a disgruntled homosexual. tell me why a dead sterile planet is more conducive to life than peanut butter, which already has
all the elements of life? tell me assmuncher. lets hear the science you unwiped asshole
moogoogaipancake 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Supergayready
come on loud mouth, let's hear it. tell me...
you won't you can't...all you are is another militant queer trying to convince people that there is no GOD...SO THAT YOUR PERVERSIONS CAN BE soooooomeday
thought to be.......normal?
moogoogaipancake 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@Sugarfagready
c'mon asshole i don't have all day to wait for one illiterate jackass
moogoogaipancake 1 year ago
@moogoogaipancake
There isn't a shred of evidence supporting the existence of a god.
rddaos 1 year ago 38
@rddaos Design, science, human logic, human spirit and conscience.
warriorprince1010 1 year ago
@rddaos The fact that you can think (that's debatable) is.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
yes but there's zero evidence supporting the existence of a god
rddaos 1 year ago
@rddaos Yes there is. The proof is that I can answer the question of "why are we here?" and "where did this all come from?". Instead of being like you, which would be the making of excuses.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
but where's your evidence? there's zero evidence the magic man exists, and you cannot cite any.
rddaos 1 year ago
@rddaos Define evidence. If you are talking in "typical" terms, if I may, there is physical proof. For example, as I have peronally experienced first hand, is the prescence of demons. Spiritual creatures, often misinterpretted as paranormal "poltergeists", or "ghosts". In actuality, these are demons. To reiterate, once again, I have experienced such phenomena in the past. Honestly, I have tried, but no evolutionary biologist can give me an explanation. The Bible is a historical work of science.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
have you considered the possibility that you are mentally ill? have you considered that you might be schizophrenic? hearing voices? seeing things? invisible creatures? magical fairies? elves? hobbits?
rddaos 1 year ago
@rddaos Your fear is causing slander.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
have you ever considered that you might possibly be mentally-insane?
rddaos 1 year ago
@rddaos Have you ever considered that you are insane? Believing evolution is like believing the world was flat back in the day. But when the proof comes, it'll hit the unbelievers hard, just like it did when they discovered the Earth was a sphere. Walk by faith, not by sight.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
Evolution is a scientific fact, while religion is fantasy that is supported by no evidence. Have you ever considered medication to help you stop hearing voices from the invisible man in the sky?
rddaos 1 year ago
@rddaos Scientific "fact"? Wow, way off there bubba. Scientific "theory" is the technical term. Have you ever considered mathematics? Because, if you have, which is quite unlikely considering your ignorance, you would find that evolutionary theory does not coincide with mathematics. However, your ignorance prevents you from seeing two sides of anything. Meaning, you are an atheist, but not an evolutionist.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
evolution (aka modern biology) is a fact of science as confirmed by every biology department at every major university. however, i've never met a jesus freak who had the slightest idea about what evolution science even says. you see, every jesus freak i've ever met has approximately a 2nd grade understanding of evolution. if you're interesting in learning about science, just ask and i'll be your teacher.
rddaos 1 year ago
@rddaos Well I guess that makes a prejudicial, stereotyping bigot (as expected). But, no thanks, I already know more on evolutionary theology apparently more than you, so I'll pass on that one.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
are you saying that like missler, you have a degree in peanut butter science?
rddaos 1 year ago
@rddaos No, just stating you are a bigot. 'Nuff said.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
"Scientific fact? Wow, way off there bubba. Scientific theory is the technical term."
- evolution is a fact when discussing the past and a theory in regard to it's predictive power.
- a SCIENTIFIC THEORY is a well evidenced and thoroughly tested principle that explains a set of facts
"Have you ever considered mathematics? Because, if you have...you would find that evolutionary theory does not coincide with mathematics" - this is simply incorrect.
types10000 1 year ago
@types10000 "Bubba?" Okay, epic fail right there. It's funny you say this because if all theory was true, then there would be some crazy things going on in the world right now. But then again..... I seem to be growing a pair of wings..... so I guess we're starting to see "Homo Ptises?" Rofl. Mathematics is an athiest's worst nightmare. If humans existed 500,000 years ago, our population would be over a nonillion.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
"Okay, epic fail right there. It's funny you say this because if all theory was true, then there would be some crazy things going on in the world right now."
- such as? every element of evolution can be observed.
"growing a pair of wings" - why would a human who (thanks to society) is subject to virtually no selective pressures at all undergoe a radical change; much less grow wings.
"Mathematics is an athiest's worst nightmare" - you keep asserting that but fail to evidence.
types10000 1 year ago
@roxtar55
"If humans existed 500,000 years ago, our population would be over a nonillion"
- why?
population growth for any animal is dependent on the resources available; mainly food.
the biggest factor affecting human population growth was been agriculture which has only been around for the past 10,000 years.
prior to this humans lived in nomadic tribes whose population growth would likely model the same as undisturbed animal populations of today ie. RELATIVE STABILITY.
types10000 1 year ago
@types10000 Because on average, the human population doubles its population faster than 150 years at a single time.
roxtar55 1 year ago
@roxtar55
"Because on average, the human population doubles its population faster than 150 years at a single time."
- yes, human population growth is rapid NOW, but as i pointed out it's highly dependent on our technological advancements and mainly agriculture.
types10000 1 year ago
@types10000 But there is not a single equation to date the first humas being 300,000 years ago. And another thing to point out is that there are artifacts dated at about 300,000 years ago, when they still contain carbon-14! How can that be? Carbon-14 has a maximum life span of 100,000 years. So how could something be 300,000 or 500,000 years old if it contains carbon-14? It can't. A hematologist will tell you the same.
roxtar55 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@roxtar55
"But there is not a single equation to date the first humas being 300,000 years ago"
a). you mean 200.000
b). that's because dating isnt done using a single equation
c). there are quite a few ways in which the 200,000 year figure is confirmed
"And another thing to point out is that there are artifacts dated at about 300,000 years ago, when they still contain carbon-14! How can that be?"
- simple, it cant be, where's your source?
types10000 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Because the universe was in a quantum state before the big bang, it adheres to the quantum uncertainty principle. There can be NO SUCH THING AS NOTHING in this universe as long as the generation of energy via virtualparticle pairs does not violate the law of energy conservation; it requires no miracle or supernatural act to create the energy in the universe.
RustyCyler 2 years ago
These people make this much too easy, don't they?
SuperImready 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Thanks Huckleberry, you said it all. I especially liked, "cheapshot mother fucker."
YouLoseAsshole 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
1. "you're not doing Christendom any favors" hahahahaha You're SOOO fkkkking funny SUDDENLY YOU WANT CHRISTIANS TO LOOK GOOD, YOU HYPOCRITE! Suddenly you're begging for the Saints to come to aid your atheist ass while any other time you'd be yelling about the 'Crusades' and the 'Inquisition' and how horrible Christians are. But now
ImY0urHuckleberry 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
2. it's, "You're just making Christians look like hypocritical, hate filled monsters" HAHAHAHAHAHAAAaaa Isn't that what you usually call us asshole? So now it's ANY stick you can grab with this little jewel, "As you can see, Christian apologetics aren't what they used to be." hahahahahaha You just forgot about the Crusades? hahahaha ya know yer a real example of a fucking asshole atheist. Thanks for revealing yourself to the whole world you cheapshot mother fucker.
ImY0urHuckleberry 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Isn't that what you usually call us asshole?"
It's what many people call Christians and you're busy proving them right.
halleyscomet 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"It's what many people call Christians and you're busy proving them right." OH......FUCK......YOU, I GIVE A SHIT AND it looks like you haven't had enough. Your mom said that you always have to have the last word like a little girl. I proved you a fucking liar and a pervert, now you think somebody is listening to you? hahahahahahaa BTW I am having fun are you? NOW Stand up for us and say something else stupid you little piece of shitwad.
YouLoseAsshole 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It's what many people call Christians" MANY PEOPLE? hahahahaha you mean atheists, perverts, goat fuckers, pig humpers, child molestors, rapers of women and other homo types, right?
YouLoseAsshole 2 years ago
Comment removed
ImY0urHuckleberry 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LoL censor everything there pal and lie just like china does. This video is fucking gay and doctored in order to try and make a joke out of somebody opinion by giving them goofy voice overs. The voice actor is clearly a fucking idiot.
No it ain't funny it's offensive.
neongodinhell 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@neongodinhell
It's offensive is it? Creationists are allowed to made rediculous arguements to affirm god's existance and denounce athiests but the second an athiest points out how stupid their arguement is it's offensive.
Their opinion SHOULD be joked at, because in the original video he has no idea firstly of what evolution is and secondly of the current scientific theory for the beginning of life (abiogenesis, NOT EVOLUTION!).
ihaterobbie123 2 years ago
LOL! this is hillarious!
Dauntless07 2 years ago 2
I was about to have some peanut butter this morning, but there was a fucking man inside the jar.
mrthingus 2 years ago
huronwarriors. You are a fool, plain and simple. What this creationist huxter is saying does not prove any kind of flaw in the theory of evolution. He is not even talking about evolution, he is talking about abiogenesis. Just another testament to the fact that creationists and christians do not know a damn thing about the natural world.
dukeoftheshire 2 years ago 13
This has been flagged as spam show
@dukeoftheshire
nobody said life on earth began by electrocuting a jar of peanut butter.
rddaos 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ok I would really like to point out that you atheists really need to stop turning the argument around, the guy is saying that evolution says due to energy and other conditions which make life sustainable, we should be seeing new species coming up out of no where. He's saying in the original video that this is why evolution doesn't exist, not this is why God doesn't exist. So back up your arguement or shut your mouths and agree that this is a flaw in the theory. Don't turn this around on God
huronwarriors 2 years ago
"evolution says due to energy and other conditions which make life sustainable, we should be seeing new species coming up out of no where"
See, that's the problem. Evolution says no such thing. Gross ignorance may be attractive to you sky-fairy imaginers, but to us logical sciencey folk, it's disgusting.
Also check Genesis - THAT is the one that says new species come out of nowhere. Well, from a wave of the holy magic wand, at least. Abracadabra, and there was light! And trees! And peanuts!
RayYT 2 years ago 5
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@RayYT
you say that there is less chance for spontaneous generation of life, now that the planet is covered with life, than there was when there was no life at all?
tell me how that works mr. evonaut.
moogoogaipancake 2 years ago
I'm guessing you're referrring to an earlier comment I made, because I don't say that here.
Anyway it's true. Life now everywhere. From the atomsphere to the rocks. One thing life likes to do is eat the stuff that other life (as we know it) is made from. The complexity required for a basic living thing wouldn't have a chance to come into being before being eaten.
But that's nothing to do wih evolution anyway. Perhaps I should just make some shit up and talk about peanut butter instead.
RayYT 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@RayYT
you dodged changed the subject refused to answer....
i'll restate question so maybe you can get it
why don't we see spontaneous generation of life....why did it happen once only
moogoogaipancake 2 years ago
Who says it only happened once? Provide evidence of it only happeneing once before you can ask that.
Anyway there are clueless retards (i.e. creationists) who believe that evolution = frogs and lemurs and dinosaurs spontaneously appearing in peanut butter. This is utter bollocks that could only happen via magic wand-waving sky faries. Science says fuck all about "spontaneous" generation of life for exactly that reason - it's the kind of fantasy tripe you get in books of fables - e.g. the bible.
RayYT 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
raty
who's doing the expereiments with abiogenisis......evolutionists or creationists? hmmm?
moogoogaipancake 2 years ago
A creationist doing experiments to test abiogenesis makes about as much sense as an atheist praying.
halleyscomet 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
@moogoogaipancake
organic molecules are eaten up immediately by microorganisms. very little chance for spontaneous generation of life in today's world. also, unlike when life first appeared on earth, the atmosphere is now oxidizing, which destroys organic molecules.
rddaos 2 years ago 7
raddos
and it's also magic now ......huh?
moogoogaipancake 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
raty
dickie dawkins to ben stein
"It could be that at some earlier time, somewhere in the universe, a civilization evolved by probably some kind of Darwinian means to a very, very high level of technology— and designed a form of life that they seeded onto perhaps this planet. And I suppose its possible that you might find evidence for that if you look at the details of biochemistry, molecular biology, you might find a signature of some sort of designer.
moogoogaipancake 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"peanut butter jars disprove abiogenesis" <--- ahahaha! fucking STUPID ape
rddaos 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@moogoogaipancake
Fuck off MeinKleinTiger.
How about you post the REST of Dawkins comment? Its because you creotards are inherently dishonest, and quote mining IS your MO.
Go on fuckbag, provide the rest of his quote, or shall I provide it on your behalf?
Lying cunt.
ChickenHawk110 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@moogoogaipancake
He was bending over backwards to provide Ben Stein with the ONLY POSSIBLE EXAMPLE of life being created by an intelligent designer.
ihaterobbie123 2 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Good point. It was really vile of Stein to take that quote out of context. When you see the uncensored video you see that Dawkins was making fun of the idea of an outside creator, yet Stein twisted his words around to make it sound like he was ADVOCATING the idea of aliens creating mankind.
I'm glad you're starting to see just how much flat out lying creationists do to support their claims.
halleyscomet 2 years ago
Comment removed
YouLoseAsshole 2 years ago
HalleysAsshole said, "When you see the uncensored video you see that Dawkins was making fun of the idea of an outside creator" You're full of shit. You're mom SAID you're a liar. This proves it. "yet Stein twisted his words around to make it sound like he was ADVOCATING the idea of aliens creating mankind" You're liar one more time. Now tell me how Stein twisted his words?
pwned
YouLoseAsshole 2 years ago 2
Ladies and gentlemen, allow me to present YouLoseAsshole, youtube's 21st century equivalent to St Thomas Aquinas or C. S. Lewis. As you can see, Christian apologetics aren't what they used to be.
halleyscomet 2 years ago
fine, here is how i back up my no-god argument, carbon dating shows the earth is billions of years old,some stars are so far away, that the light we see from them is millions of yeas old, the summerians invented glue 7000 years ago, 1000 years before the supposed christian creation, now, we know since ancient times people have created myths to explain nature, from aztec to greek, to modern christianity, which basically ripped off all pagan religions, religion is obsolete except for simple minded
JackPhelpswho 2 years ago 12
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@JackPhelpswho
hey asshole.....how did nothing make all things.....to be atheist you believe that all things were made by nothing....explain
stupid-ass
moogoogaipancake 2 years ago
wow, showing some christina love there, well we don't believe it all came from nothing, galaxies are moving away from each other, which evidence points to an explosion from which all matter was once condensed, the big bang theory, now we don't know where this original matter came from, but saying, "god did it" answers absolutely nothing, and sets us back to an age where ignorance was accepted because it was simpler, the regressive argument only poses the question, then who made god?
JackPhelpswho 2 years ago 19
@JackPhelpswho Your comment is so well done, I wonder if you meant "christian love" or whether "christina love" was your real intention. I find both are valid. Lol!
ergonomover 1 year ago
@JackPhelpswho If there was a time where there is absolutely nothing in existence at all... nothing can possibly come from nothing. Take a building 4 example. That building did not decied to build itself 1day it must of had help to be constructed. So think of the universe as a building, it must of had help to be here. Since things do exist! There4, there could never have been absolutely nothing, something had to have always been in existence b4 anything else. Sry, I wud have been more detailed.
CrashOveride001 1 year ago
@moogoogaipancake
Nobody thinks nothing made everything except dumb bible slappers.
rddaos 2 years ago 8
dados
you do......an atheist has to believe that all things came from nothing at all......or you have to believe someone made it.....your hero dickie dawkins told ben stien that aliens did it.....hahahahaha!!!
moogoogaipancake 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
no, i do not believe a magical invisible man in the sky came from nothing and created himself and now he grants wishes to those who kiss his ass. This is what creationists believe.
rddaos 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
daddoes
that does not alter the fact that you believe that everything was created by nothing at all for no reason at all........genius
moogoogaipancake 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nooo it's the creationist bimbos who think a magical sky fairy created himself out of nothing and made the universe. This is not my stupid belief system, it's the creationists'.
rddaos 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"your hero dickie dawkins told ben stien that aliens did it"
Try watching the uncensored version. You can see that Dawkins was making fun of the idea of aliens creating life on Earth, and he want on to explain that even THAT idea only moves the question of where life came from to another planet.
Stein's dishonesty really shines through in how he used that clip.
halleyscomet 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@moogoogaipancake
So where did God come from?
If you have to invoke a magical super being who always existed and had no beginning in time, yet provides no tangible evidence of its existence, why not cut the mysticism out of the loop and assume the matter in the universe always existed?
halleyscomet 2 years ago
You've been screwing them bunnies haven't you?
YouLoseAsshole 2 years ago
HalleysAsshole, you're a lowlife fucking scumbag mutherfukker. Even your own mom hates your sorry ass. She says you're a useless no good little bastard. She is bereaved that you have turned out to be a fucking queer. She thinks your uncle is responsible for it. She can't quite put her thumb on when you started taking it up the ass. She said she even caught you sucking the dog's dick for crying out loud.
YouLoseAsshole 2 years ago
She said her first inclination was when she caught you blowing the trash-men. She said she hopes you get hit by a truck or something. She claims that she's never known a more disgusting creep in her whole life. She said you're just like your father.
YouLoseAsshole 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Somehow I doubt that is what my pastor meant when he referred to the "love of Christ."
halleyscomet 2 years ago
haliescumit
what comes first in your mind. being true to evo or blowing homeless guys.
i think bumsuk is a good name for you
ImY0urHuckleberry 2 years ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
You're a deep cover liberal, aren't you?
Seriously, you're not doing Christendom any favors by spewing raw unfiltered hate like that. You're just making Christians look like hypocritical, hate filled monsters incapable of rational thought.
halleyscomet 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hahhahahahahahaaa Look at the bully crying and wailing. Somebody just kicked him in the balls and now it's wah wah wah wah wah Well ya little chickenshit pervert asshole FUCK YOU! So you don't like it when you get some of your own shit back. Why didn't you tell me that I should be acting like an atheist? HUH? "You're a deep cover liberal, aren't you?" Great comeback you pussy. Now go whine to your mommy before you get some more you fucking piece of dog shit.
ImY0urHuckleberry 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You're very good at making Christians look bad.
halleyscomet 2 years ago
"and other conditions which make life sustainable"
Conditions which the food industry does not replicate, obviously. Check out Miller's test. He made amino-acids form.
TamaThePeck 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
CrashOveride001 1 year ago
@huronwarriors :
If god is real, why aren't there proofs? evolution has proofs, so shut the fuck up about your fuckin' god of shit
Biguspikned 1 year ago
Comment removed
FilTonks 2 years ago
That guy is so right. Peanut butter can't make life. But an invisible man in the sky OBVIOUSLY can.
GASP!! What if peanut butter is the actual true God? What if we go to heaven and find a big jar of peanut butter?
Orgaya 2 years ago 8
Comment removed
FilTonks 2 years ago
Actually, they contradict themselves. I saw the Virgin Mary in my jelly once.
Orgaya 2 years ago 7
Comment removed
halleyscomet 2 years ago
You didn't see shit asshole. Your mom says you have a little bitty pee pee and all you do is play with it. She says you're fkking pervert and a liar who nobody believes.
YouLoseAsshole 2 years ago 8
you keep vaseline because who's pumping you up the ass....queer
Y0ureNoDaisy 2 years ago 12
i bet god is really mad at this guy. maybe he will smite him. probably not since ya know, he doesnt exist and all.
biggiddy12 2 years ago 6
hate to break it to you kid, but childishly imitating smart people doesnt make you cool. it wont get you friends and certainly not respect :(
giggles2boot 2 years ago
Hilarious xD
clerlic 2 years ago 2
Some heretics falsly believe that the bible was written by god himself and therefore was literally god's word.
They deny that the evangelists were mere human beings and the works of only 4 out of more than 80 were admitted to contribute to "the book of books" by vote in early conciliums.
This attitude produced the absurd idea that earth was only 6000 years old, based on a calculation made by "bible scientists" involving Noah's age of 950 years.
A disservice to real christian values.
flamifer 2 years ago 2
Prick maybe......Stupid no. Having to resort to calling me a prick in light of your lack of intelligence makes you the prick. Your belief in magic also makes you a retard.
Munro1Man 2 years ago 3
No sky daddies and magic are a laugh. Well it would be a laugh if so many idiots did not believe it.
Munro1Man 2 years ago 5
OOPs deity my bad
Munro1Man 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I ASKED FIRST ASSHOLE
HOW DID NOTHING MAKE EVERYTHING
you ignorant fuck
Spectatio 2 years ago
you mean god? magic!!!!
"let it be light", and from nothing, magic man in the sky made the light!!!! ahhh, science is so great.
lapiz1969 2 years ago 10
This comment has received too many negative votes show
stop the panic...you know as well as i do that there is no such thing as an atheist...
only liars.....physics can't save your lies and it can't produce something from nothing...
Spectatio 2 years ago
No such thing as an atheist....... well I agree with you there. Only grown ups and intellectually honest people who reject the truth of fairy tales. Don't think we need to be labelled Atheist any more than we need to be called Afairyist or Agoblinist.
So where did god make us from bright lad? Nothing maybe. He just magicked us into existence. Where did god come from? From nothing maybe? Don't make the grown ups laugh.
Munro1Man 2 years ago 6
Eh I don't mind the title atheist for now, because of the current minority status overall, and especially in Turkey and the U.S. among more developed countries. Unlike agoblinist. But eventually, hopefully this title will become useless, like afairyist. :P
tremapar 2 years ago 6
liars? and you say that based on what? I am clueless about physics because I went to business school. Market research is my thing... but, I graduated from a jesuit High school and college... had lots of bible study and because I understand it, I know jesus is no god!!! if he ever existed, he could not save shit. Then again, you are free to believe in the cosmic zombi seating on top of the moon ... by the way, how much do you contribute monetary to ur pastor?
lapiz1969 2 years ago 7
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i see you hate Jesus sooooo you know which God is the true God....no sense hating Gaia or Brahama...you just proved you are a Godhater and not an atheist.
you are very very angery so that seals the truth of what i say......now asshole tell me how nothing makes something.
Spectatio 2 years ago
hate jesus? how the fuck do you get your "facts"? I do not believe in jesus as a god. I have no clue if he did exist as a man, as a god, he is just as worthless as gaia, quetzalcoatl, thor, etc. I cannot hate something that I don´t believe it exists. asshole? where the fuck is your xtian love? hypocrite!! Something from nothing? simple, asshole god said: let it be light, plants, etc. something from nothing is YOUR version. Ask Copperfield, he uses the same technique as ur god: MAGIC
lapiz1969 2 years ago 7
The same way the nothing made your god or the same way your god made us from nothing. I'm not sure to be honest (neither is anyone else) but I would bet its more likely the nothingness you speak of created some simple Hydrogen rather than a diety.
Munro1Man 2 years ago 3