Added: 2 months ago
From: MrFreedomGuru
Views: 4,520
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (54)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I wonder if anyone ever signed up for his "history" courses

  • I dislike Beck and Gingrich equally. But Beck's main point on the FDA and Coca-Cola issue isn't correct. The Pure Food and Drug Act targeted Coke for its high caffeine content.

    I stopped listening after that.

  • omg beck!!

  • I am a huge Ron Paul supporter because he is represents least government control.

    Romney and Santorum dont understand the world the way Dr. Paul does but, I will agree that Romney would be a safer choice than Gingrich.

    However, Romney is supported by Goldman Sachs which is who also gave Obama the most money.

    So your down to Paul or Santorum. Santorum is just way too immature to be a president.

    Its gotta be Ron Paul. No other way to slice it.

    Sorry Glenn.

  • @yougottabekiddinmee absolutely flawless reasoning except that I disagree on ron pauls total deregulation plan because we, who elect the government, must also protect ourselves from banks becoming powerful enough to hold the free market hostage. we need some regulation. goldman sachs would be very happy with paul in that regard, because right now they still have to spend billions in lobbying to get deregulation.

  • @schlafanzyk Thanks. Consider this thought. Remember who is writing the regulations being enforced by the government right now. The big banks write the financial regs. The big Pharma writes the health care regs. I propose to you that they write these regulations to prohibit honest competition from smaller business. They want to monopolize their particular area of profit.

    There are enough regs. We just have to put the crooks in jail when they behave like crooks.

  • @schlafanzyk Take the power away from the government to hand out favors to people using money to influence, and you take the monetary influence out of the government.

    Look, ethanol lobbyists worked hard to include 10% ethanol in gasoline. The government had the power to do a special favor for the ethonal industry. Wala! We have to use shitty gas and pay a premium price along with messing up our food costs.

    Again, if the government does not have the power to mandate, we choose our gas.

  • Uhhhhhhm Glenn, why are you talking smack about Newt. You're a frickin mormon. How much intelligence does that show...

  • Glenn I don't agree with you that Ron Paul is a good candidate for president so let me go and write a book based on all the things I don't like about Ron Paul then do an interview with you and I will use my own book as a basis to argue against your answers that you give me in the interview it is the same thing you are doing in this video. Guarantee you will come back at me as I am to you calling me bias because I am using a book I wrote.

  • take notice to his bias here. To argue Newt Gingrich on his stand points Glen Beck uses a book that he himself (Glen Beck) wrote strike one. To argue stand points of someone else you should use actual fact Instead of a book that you wrote. Of course this video will succeed in making Newt look bad he is using bias to fight against Newt.

  • Whats the music at the end ?

  • @AdurianJ Check my channel. Freedom Guru is my ALIAS. I have the song on this accounts channel titled "Piano"

  • This grilled saussage is cooked

  • Yes, Glenn, get rid of the FDA....great idea. Jesus fucking christ this guy is an idiot. He barely has a high school diploma and the tea party hillbillies think he is capable of critical and analytical thinking?

  • @mikesmith007x What's so great about the FDA? Millions of dead americans in a useless drug war, and pointless assaults on people who consume raw milk. /yawn What a great organization.

  • @Madfoot713 FDA and drug war? Are you confusing the FDA with the DEA? Go back to school nutjob.

  • @mikesmith007x Marijuana (and other drugs) are scheduled under the FDA.

  • @Madfoot713 The FDA is not in the law enforcement business nor do they craft legislation. I think you need to review the Controlled Substance Act of 1970 to learn how to distinguish what the Drug Enforcement Administration does and what the FDA does.

  • @mikesmith007x The FDA writes all the rules and regulations which the DEA enforces. Fuck both of them, I don't need a government committee to tell me how to make a sandwich.

  • I have watched an listened to Glenn "religiously." I was even at Caesaria for Restoring Courage. That does not mean that I am a "Beckbot." I love Glenn but he's got this all wrong. I didn't think that his followers were sheep but that may be. And wake up, racists, opponents of Obama are supporters of Allen West and Herman Cain. Stop using race to explain everything.

  • @moshe219 You missed his point. Newt Gingrich, like Mitt Romney, is a carbcon clone copy of Obama. He's almost always fought against accusations of racism towards the Tea Party, but here he's asking what's the difference between Newt and Obama? Party loyalty and race. It's absurd more than anything else.

  • If you are being called out by a retarded Christian neocon like Beck, you know you are doing something wrong.

  • @viletree If you think Beck is a neocon a la Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld then "neocon" has become a broken word. Mark my words, as soon as Bachmann drops out Beck will throw his support behind Ron Paul.

  • @SheyOneTen "Beck will throw his support behind Ron Paul" No he wont, Ron Paul doesn't support Israel over the United States, ergo Beck will never support him.

  • @Lord0Xel Actually, I think you're right. As I re-read my prediction now, I see it as nothing more than wishful thinking.

  • @Lord0Xel Sadly you're right, but at least he has a mind of his own. I've always thought Beck gets too much hate.

  • @Lord0Xel I may have spoken too soon! Apparently on Beck's radio show today he said he'd consider voting for Paul if he was a 3rd party candidate and Newt was the Republican nominee. Granted that this may just be Beck pandering to Paul supporters. I never realistically thought that Beck would soften his irrational support for Israel enough to support Paul, but I suppose stranger things have happened.

  • I don't know if Newt Gingrich will survive the attack of the popular conservative pundits who have a little more formed conservative ideology than the average Republican voter. However, I think a lot of the Tea Party people do not like Obama in large part because of his race (which I don't blame them for) in combination with his policies and rhetoric. I think a lot of them would look the other way for a white Republican candidate that has more "pro American" conservative rhetoric.

  • @AnglosphereAlIiance Do you have any actual evidence that "a lot of the Tea Party do not like Obama in large part because of his race?" Or is this just speculation built on the foundation of previous speculation?

  • @Sam

    None of them will likely come out and say it because of political correctness. It comes from speaking with them and the sociological factor of race. Obama's policies and rhetoric added to by his race make it even worse. I said it is a combination of all three. It helps explain why so many would rather have a white republican with conservative rhetoric that has/had similar policies to Obama than Obama himself. I also don't like Obama in part because of his race as well.

  • @AnglosphereAlIiance  Bullspit. Tea Partiers were totally enamored with Cain before he imploded. They are not about race. Only anti-conservatives and neo-libs are bring up the race thing.

  • @EffieReal

    You need to re read my comment instead of a knee jerk reaction and look at how big a sociological factor race is.

  • @AnglosphereAlIiance I have the the mental capacity to ascertain upon first reading that your comment's premise is hollow and devoid of inscrutable evidence. Re-reading it did you no favors. Now I am adding that your insistence upon my re-reading that drivel along with your pathetic attempt to defend it with a vapid generalization like "sociological factor" whilst admitting that you personally have a "problem with Obama's race" exemplifies my first comment.You are the one hung up on race.

  • @EffieReal

    The biggest indicator if two or more people will associate is race. It is not a matter of opinion but fact that it is important sociologically. It is important biologically as well but that is more in the realm of opinion for now than the sociology part. Obamas race just make his policies and rhetoric worse for conservatives who would pick a Gingrich that has had similar policies but is white and says things they like. Cain fits the same boat as Gingrich buthe'sblack

  • Ron Paul is the only candidate with Common Sense of all the morons. In fact the current Republicans are so stupid, Ron Paul is like an Einstein surrounded by monkeys. Still I don't see anyone winning against Obama on 2012, Republicans are just wasting our money on worthless campains and we're not doing anything.

  • I can't believe how many republicans are drinking the "newt kool aid"

    He's a pile of crap.

  • Glenn, I love you. You wear your patriotism on your sleeve. You are supporting the Jewish people and Israel when it's unpopular. But I totally disagree with your stance on Newt Gingrich. He may not be perfect but he is not a puppet of George Soros. He will work to control spending and will work to make us energy independent. I never thought you'd fight so hard against Obama and then help him get reelected. This is a sad day for me.

  • @moshe219 He's not helping him get reelected. Did you watch Glenn's interview with Newt? Did you listen to anything he said? Gingrich is a progressive. Period. No ammount of him being "electable" is going to change that. Same with Romney, too.

  • Glenn just endorse bachmanny crazy and get it over with, I mean she's got about a snowballs chance in hell, but hey go ahead oh and she is crazy as hell

  • And Glen Beck wants to save as much of our money as possible in order to divert it to whatever Israel may need it for.

  • Both Mitt and Newt have baggage but Newt is much more brilliant and will be much more effective smacking down Obama on a debate stage. Second, at least Newt is able to apologize for past mistakes and admit he was wrong to seek reconciliation. Romney is so pompous, he’d never apologize for past positions. Third, Romney is attacking character. Newt has the dignity to remain positive with regard to his opponents. He has maintained this position both when he was up and down in the polls.

  • Comment removed

  • @snorp73 I think your wrong. Trusting in a candidate that has a history of lies is not exactly intelligent and this is what the major problem in America is. You want Obama out but you do realize that, even if Newt does in fact win, he wont bring about much change if any at all. He will not be that different at all. Your just voting for a different face.

    Honestly, Ron Paul has the best shot at beating Obama because he is favored by independents and democrats and well as republicans.

  • @MrFreedomGuru lol Ron Paul is an excellent candidate but hes a weak leadership figure, that is why people are hesitant to get behind him. I've watched pretty much all of newts videos on youtube. He has some excellent ideas and strategies and he gets very specific about it.

  • @Arcturistheballer Only because the vast majority of people are too fucking spineless to stand on their own two feet.

  • @viletree lol are you serious? paul wont get elected because "the vast majority of people are too fucking spineless to stand on their own two feet"?

    do you get paid for your political commentary? because you should.

  • @MrFreedomGuru Ron Paul has no support from Democrats and Independents and only about 10% of the vote of Republicans. He is not a factor in the race.

  • @MrFreedomGuru the difference between gingrich and obama is not a "different face". the difference is that while gingrich hasnt been perfectly straight on the moral compass, he has had an actual record of balancing the budget. youre oversimplifying a very complex man by looking at his history of promiscuity while ignoring more relevant things. that being said, Ron Paul is still the most honest candidate, even if i dont agree with two of views.

  • @snorp73 I thought Herman Cain was our best shot. That sure went well.

  • @snorp73

    I'm not buying that, in a fair, clean election, any of the Repubs would wipe the floor with Obama. I mean, what 20-30% of this nation are either welfare queens, union members and communists? And that's being generous.Gingrich will be no different, I can't bring myself to vote for him or Romney.

  • @snorp73 Newt or Obama? No thanks brother. That's like trading shit for manure.

  • Hey Glenn this is what smart people know about you Mormans-- You will stick together in your magic pantie circle jerk ---Just like you are now defending Romney ! HEY GLENN DO YOU THINK WE SHOULD VETT -- MITTS ALIAS NAME ?? His Celestial name ?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more