It proves that chemical weapons were there and also that much of the damage that kills civilians is caused by the enemy, not us. That's what this "bid' proves. "They're just glad they've been given their lives back". Any part of that you don't understand?
The sarin gas found was proven as lost in the gulf war. And harmed all of 2 soldiers. (It was expired). Also, Bush's Iraq war has killed more people in this 8 years than Saddam's 20+ years. I'm not saying Saddam was good, "he was a bastard...but he was our bastard" - quote Phil Donahue.
("Bid" was supposed to be "bit". But I was an an ipod touch.)
You're quoting Phil Donahue and u expect to be taken seriously? hahahaha and none of the gas featured in this video or the one I mentioned is about "impotent" gas, probably cause incorporating a stabilizer chemical called tributylamine. (Later this was replaced by diisopropylcarbodiimide (di-c-di)), which allowed for sarin to be stored in aluminium casings, and giving it longer shelf life,
at least do some research to back up ur incoheirant rantings, and knowing what ur talking about usually helps too. Ur a perfect example of someone who watches MSNBC and believes everything they say.
If this was considered a discovered WMD then why is Bush and O'Reilly and Cheney saying that they were wrong about WMDs? Does it strike you at all as odd?
You have a pitiful argument. Come back whence you've actually researched the subject. I'm sick of you neocons grasping any shred of hope that there are WMDs in Iraq. There aren't
If you thought u had a rat infestation and after months of searching found only a set of rat bones and no other signs, you do not have a rat infestation.
And this is where ur "The sarin gas found was proven as lost in the gulf war" came from: According to the CIA,[2] in 1989 the Iraqi Government destroyed 40 or more tons of sarin that had decomposed, and that some Iraqi sarin had a shelf life of only a few weeks, owing mostly to impure precursors- WIKIPEDIA
The liberals bent that story to fit there arguement.
You show numerous signs of what I call "Right wing paranoia Syndrome" RWPS for short. It's a syndrome in which right wingers are so paranoid and fearful of themselves being wrong that they blame everything on Liberals and try to pin liberals as bad guys.
Yeah and ur liberallyretarded, classic liberal can't back up his "facts" so he resorts to name callin, and tellin me what I think, u just reinforced my belief that liberals will say anything to get people on their side, and their's is the side of evil.
Yeah. I must say. Acceptance, tolerance, and freedom is evil. I'm sorry. Maybe I should go get a swastika tattoo and join the klan so you can consider me good?
I've already given you the facts. u just won't accept them. And still u haven't answered me about Bush, Cheney & Bill O'Reilly. They admit there were no WMDs. Why would they say there wasn't when they would have so much to gain from saying there was?
Wikipedia is a consensus not fact. Just so you know. You should consult more than that.
when was this? what year?
xzaxx 11 months ago
Canadian special forces were and probably still are operating covertly in iraq.....
andrewd556 3 years ago
Not weapons of mass destruction, testing of chemical weapons. al-quadea does not = Saddam. Saddam hated terrorists.
PumaPumaPride 3 years ago
Hitler was a vegetarian too - doesnt make him ANY less a scumbag.
Dont ever EVER make excuse for a dictator , they take away human dignity and life. They deserve worse than we could every imagine for them.
lord69z 3 years ago
Saddam was also a paranoid dictator, that had his "people" watching his people, theres no way in hell he didn't know they were there.
M249SAWzALL 2 years ago
AWESOME U just drove a truck through the rather large hole in the liberal arguement, nice work!
hellyeah762007 4 years ago
explain urself. (ie what arguement, what did this bid prove.etc). Come on with it
Propagandhi900 4 years ago
It proves that chemical weapons were there and also that much of the damage that kills civilians is caused by the enemy, not us. That's what this "bid' proves. "They're just glad they've been given their lives back". Any part of that you don't understand?
princetrumpet 4 years ago
The sarin gas found was proven as lost in the gulf war. And harmed all of 2 soldiers. (It was expired). Also, Bush's Iraq war has killed more people in this 8 years than Saddam's 20+ years. I'm not saying Saddam was good, "he was a bastard...but he was our bastard" - quote Phil Donahue.
("Bid" was supposed to be "bit". But I was an an ipod touch.)
Propagandhi900 4 years ago
SEARCH:WMD's Found In Iraq, and when the delivery systems are gone that doesn't mean the gas isn't still deadly as fuck!
M249SAWzALL 3 years ago
did you read my WHOLE comment? It was a WMD at one point b4, but it got lost, expired, and lost it's potency.
When you find a fully active nuke, or gas bomb, that isn't expired to the point of near harmlessness, then let me now.
Propagandhi900 3 years ago
You're quoting Phil Donahue and u expect to be taken seriously? hahahaha and none of the gas featured in this video or the one I mentioned is about "impotent" gas, probably cause incorporating a stabilizer chemical called tributylamine. (Later this was replaced by diisopropylcarbodiimide (di-c-di)), which allowed for sarin to be stored in aluminium casings, and giving it longer shelf life,
hellyeah762007 3 years ago
at least do some research to back up ur incoheirant rantings, and knowing what ur talking about usually helps too. Ur a perfect example of someone who watches MSNBC and believes everything they say.
hellyeah762007 3 years ago
and incase u havent figured it out M249SAWzALL is my other name
hellyeah762007 3 years ago
Curious, you give me the impression of someone who watches Fasci...I mean...Fox News...and believes everything they say.
Propagandhi900 3 years ago
If this was considered a discovered WMD then why is Bush and O'Reilly and Cheney saying that they were wrong about WMDs? Does it strike you at all as odd?
You have a pitiful argument. Come back whence you've actually researched the subject. I'm sick of you neocons grasping any shred of hope that there are WMDs in Iraq. There aren't
If you thought u had a rat infestation and after months of searching found only a set of rat bones and no other signs, you do not have a rat infestation.
Propagandhi900 3 years ago
And this is where ur "The sarin gas found was proven as lost in the gulf war" came from: According to the CIA,[2] in 1989 the Iraqi Government destroyed 40 or more tons of sarin that had decomposed, and that some Iraqi sarin had a shelf life of only a few weeks, owing mostly to impure precursors- WIKIPEDIA
The liberals bent that story to fit there arguement.
hellyeah762007 3 years ago
You show numerous signs of what I call "Right wing paranoia Syndrome" RWPS for short. It's a syndrome in which right wingers are so paranoid and fearful of themselves being wrong that they blame everything on Liberals and try to pin liberals as bad guys.
Propagandhi900 3 years ago
Yeah and ur liberallyretarded, classic liberal can't back up his "facts" so he resorts to name callin, and tellin me what I think, u just reinforced my belief that liberals will say anything to get people on their side, and their's is the side of evil.
hellyeah762007 3 years ago
Yeah. I must say. Acceptance, tolerance, and freedom is evil. I'm sorry. Maybe I should go get a swastika tattoo and join the klan so you can consider me good?
I've already given you the facts. u just won't accept them. And still u haven't answered me about Bush, Cheney & Bill O'Reilly. They admit there were no WMDs. Why would they say there wasn't when they would have so much to gain from saying there was?
Wikipedia is a consensus not fact. Just so you know. You should consult more than that.
Propagandhi900 3 years ago