Hypocrite-in-Chief Newt Gingrich

[jgra66]

Newt is the man. This country needs another Reagan.

[MYTHOMINHTRAN]

Newt is big liar, hatress the other who are better than him. Fat and jealous who is

sex addicted!

Command in chief that what he wants to be? He is the next guys make the US becomes a bigger debtor while his wallet get'll thicker. Open your eyes folks!!!

[lsdesign]

lol, newt can't screw....he is a big dough boy douche bag who can't get it up.

[franklindavid]

As long as you can get it uuuuuuuup, variety is the spice of life.

[GPEGEMGTM3]

LOL keep arguing back and forth "Democrats" and "Republicans". Keep the charade up while corporations and banks (ahem the REAL POWER) keep printing the dough.

"What you want in a media system is ostensible diversity that conceals an actual uniformity." Joseph Goebbels

[12dollarsand78cents]

Name all the Republicans, but forget very many Democrats, like Howard Dean cheating on his sick wife.

I would never vote for a person that cheats on and lies to the person they "love" the most.

There is no god(s), see video above.

[visfati]

You liberals are not simply ignorant. You're vitriolic, close-minded, hateful, arrogant and elitist.

The bottom line is.... Stop telling everyone else how to live. Stop legislating your morality and imposing mandates upon the people.

It's odd how you all call Conservatives "fascist".... when in fact, your movement requires muscling people into submission.

You get upset when Conservatives mandate morality and behavior in pro-life campaigns. Yet you mandate absolutely EVERYTHING in life.

[bohemianwriter1]

@visfati

"The bottom line is.... Stop telling everyone else how to live. Stop legislating your morality and imposing mandates upon the people."

HAHAHA! That's funny! This coming from a RWer whos party wants to ban gay marriage, ban abortion, stop DADT, criminalize weed, supports impeachements of something tou RWers do ALL the time yourself! I'm sure even you realize the staggering stupidity of your own statement. .One word for ya fella: HYPOCRITE

[shemp2]

@visfati "Yet you mandate absolutely EVERYTHING in life."

Like what?

[mstrhck]

Life sucks when you call Gingrich a hypocrite.

[prffsrx]

Newt Gingrich scares poor little liberals all over America because he actually makes more since than any of the liberal talking heads on the government controlled media of CNN, ABC, CBS, and NBC. The only thing is that the Al'Qaeda and Saudi Arabian sponsored Young Turks can be do is squeal like a pig and mutter snide little nothings to their ever diminishing fan base.

[sophielovesmaher]

@prffsrx

While the repubs were trying to get rid of clinton, bin-laden was plotting against this country.

And if all you can do is call opponents names, you are conceding defeat.

[imanerd36]

Did you know Newt Gingrich wanted a mandatory death penalty for bringing in more than 50 grams(a little less than 2 ounces) into the US. Such a dick.

[1000Demons]

Ken Starr was such an arsehole.

He was just a prick who wanted to make a name for himself by taking down Clinton.

Happy to go after a guy just for his personal life.

F**K him.

[Fishdogpigsquirrel]

Newt is a bit off his cracker lol

[ScaperSteph]

Yep, that whole thing was messed up. I was so irritated with the Republicans over this. (I had to watch most of the impeachment because I worked the boards at a tv station).

Yeah, Clinton messed up, but, it was a family issue.

The Republicans tried to tear this country apart. Look what happened when Bush became president.

[greeniem]

Gingrich is a new english term for "cunt"

[1000Demons]

greeniem: So what you're saying is that "Ken Starr was a Gingrich"? :D

Hear, hear!

[PeteTheBossRoss]

Others have said it but I'll repeat it. Bill Clinton wasn't impeached for having an affair. He was impeached for lying under oath in a court of law - flat out. The two things are completely different, one being obviously much more serious than the other. He's lucky he wasn't held legally accountable as a normal citizen would have been.

[TimeWarp66]

Absolutely correct.

[greeniem]

And you're full of shit and should have impeached a real liar, over Iran Contra , Ronald Reagan

[bigb3n011]

newt twisted bill clintons arm and convinced him to sign welfare reform, and to balance the budget, all the while the whiny democrats were bitching. Newt for president! By the way it was kenneth star who led the trial not newt.

[greeniem]

I can tell you're a republican because you're full of excuses, which is ok. We don't mind at all. Clinton handed you your ass twice, now we're going to do it again

:-)

[bigb3n011]

clinton bent over backwards for the republican majority and the left hated him for it. Newt pushed welfare reform through the legislature and clinton signed, same thing for balancing the budget.

[paulaabdulabdul]

@greeniem u r so right

[FuriousTealeaf]

Yes, but thats why he was in court, and as Cenk pointed out, anyone would lie in that situation. It wasn't right by any stretch of the imagination, but I could maybe sympathize with Clinton, and it is wrong to impeach a president for lying about a personal issue.

[bigtexansfan]

@PeteTheBossRoss - Fucking BULLSHIT!! That's what you're going to say because all these republican douchebags have been found out for the cynical hypocrites that they all are! That whole fiasco was nothing but a GOP witch-hunt and it's sweet justice their own chickens came home to roost. The GOP know they can get away with this kind of bullshit because they can count on their base to always vote their hate instead of their best interest.

[mr2ombie]

@PeteTheBossRoss If you actually watched the video, you'll see they address that issue at time 3:48. If you actually believe that it was only about lying under oath, you have tunnel vision on purpose. Go back and watch the news archives. They made it into a sex scandal. They shouldn't have even asked Clinton about his sex life under oath in the first place.

[MuayThaiFighter2009]

Gingrich is a FAGGOT

[TimeWarp66]

I thought you Liberals are tolerant of homosexuals? Hypocricy much?

[NuBN247]

InvestigatorDave you are correct, the evidence was indeed there and as directed, the jury found reasonable doubt. That you choose to deny what was clear to the jury, who by the way had no reason to nullify OJ's guilt, makes me hope that you have not been similarly blind when serving on a jury. The prosecutors had nothing but a theory and the emotion of a black accused of killing a blonde. That you refuse to believe that some cops lie and plant evidence says volumes. Still, I wish you well.

[WeVoteRight]

Clinton was impeached for lying before a grand jury, morons, not because he played hide the cigar with Monica.

[JRserver]

Three Simple Yes/No questions. I'll go ahead and answer the first one:

1.) Was it wrong of Bill Clinton to have an extra-marital affair with Monica Lewinsky.

Yes, Absolutely

Now your turn

2.) Was his extra-marital affair something that Gingrich and the rest of Congress had any business interrogating Clinton about whatsoever?

3.) Does this make Gingrich a monumental hypocrite, and if so, does this then cast tremendous doubt on his trustworthiness?

[Nuke2818]

Like it or not our President does have to maintain more digified stadards because of his unique responsibilities. Its just the nature of the job! Like it don't like it, doesn't really matter, but you have to deal with it!

[VortexofGod]

Newt isnt any more moral than Clinton but Newt wasnt the president of the united states and he didnt lie to the country under oath.

[HegAndCapGood]

Neither did Clinton: The legal definition of sex is explicitly coitus only-oral sex is not intercourse. Everyone is applied to one objective standard, and that is unanimous, legal interpretation.

So, he really didn't "lie".

[JRserver]

I just wish that he did try to run for President, so we could call him out on this, and watch him make a total fool of himself trying to say, "Bill Clinto commited a felony in lying to me about something that was none of my fucking business anyway."

And this is a guy who would go on to write a book called, "Rediscovering God in America" and get a whole lot of lapdance interviews with Sean Vanity.

Sounds a bit more hypocritical than a $400 haircut, or what plane Al Gore flies in, ya think?

[pbilger]

What I think is funny, Rep's talk about pork spending. Newt pass the largest tax bill under Clinton. No only that The Rep's paid Star 650,000 million dollars trying to get Clinton so Newt to take the White House.

[ekrist]

These guys say that "its not about perjury, its about sex". They make that statement as an end all. I was just hoping that they would explain how they are so sure that it wasn't about perjury.

[lebaneseameer]

Lying to save his marriage is not impeach-worthy! Lying to make sure your buddies in the arms and weapons industry get rich is impeach-worthy....George Bush has lied his ass off the whole time.

[SamFreedom]

This is why liberals and the left can't be trusted. He does what all people wish politicians would do and that is BE HONEST. He explained why he had to go after Clinton... the highest elected official in the land does not get a free pass on PERJURY no matter how popular he is and no matter how hypocritical anyone thinks his detractors are. Get with it, folks... and report on some real news.

[DblOSmith]

Yeah, I have a friend that always uses "It's the perjury", it's so stupid. A complete crock.

[InvestigatorDave]

Clinton was impeached because of the perjury. Lost his law license for awhile over it too. You may call it a "crock", but it is true. You can look it up and everything. I swear, it's true.

[DblOSmith]

Fine. Even if it's true, and I think it's not... Which of many felonies is Bush getting impeached for?

[InvestigatorDave]

It is true. It is indisputable. Bush is being impeached for the crimes he committed, and for which there is a criminal charge, brought by a member of congress, with supporting evidence. Which means, he is not being impeached, and that's because there is no reason to impeach him.

[darkgatherer]

lololol no reason to impeach Bush? That has to be the funniest thing I have ever heard in my life. There is a laundry list of things that Bush could be impeached on and I'm talking about actual crimes, not a BJ.

[InvestigatorDave]

Again, for you and the others who either weren't alive during the impeachment or had no access to media: Clinton was impeached for perjury, not a sex act. Secondly, if there are so many charges that can be brought against Bush, and a mountain of evidence to support each, where are the hearings/indictments? BTW, nice of you to come to the rescue of Smith, he seemed stymied after 4 days.

[johnedwards1968]

The problem is there is noone to impeach Bush. The justice department won't do anything, and the democrats have no backbone. Just because you're not convicted, does not mean you didn't break the law.

[InvestigatorDave]

You are correct that just because one isn't convicted does not mean one did not break the law. The OJ trial is a great example of that.

However, it is a darn good indicator that no evidence brought forth, resulting in no indictment, and further resulting in now trial/hearing means no crime. The OJ jury ignored the evidence. The lack of charges against W are because there is no evidence to ignore.

[johnedwards1968]

I think you're ignoring the main part of my argument. No one is willing to bring the charges, in spite of any evidence which may exist. There's a serious breakdown in judicial process, and I wonder if you'll feel any differently when the other sides in charge. These things have a way of getting worse.

[InvestigatorDave]

As you have not listed what that evidence might be, (nor has anyone in a position to bring or recommend charges), I am left to believe there is no such evidence.

If there were evidence of wrong-doing, it would be incumbent upon Congress to bring charges, and I have to believe someone would be willing to do it. And yet . . .

[NuBN247]

The OJ jury followed the judge's charge to acquit if they found reasonable doubt. If there was a blood trail from the crime scene to OJ's home and the prosecution contended he drove at breakneck speed, why was there no blood in the Bronco nor any sign of the bloody glove allegedly dropped. There was blood placed on his sock and on the gate from a vial the cop did not properly turn in and then, there was Fuhrman! Not saying OJ did not do it, just that the jury did their job properly.

[InvestigatorDave]

I will not dignify this ridiculous conspiracy theory with an argument to the contrary. The evidence was there, there was no proof to support what you claim, and even those on OJ's side in the trial have come out with the truth (finally!). Jury nullification, pure and simple.

[DblOSmith]

"I hate your family." lol. Hilarious.

[itcamefromabove]

The nerve!