Moon Puzzle, Missing Evolutionary Pieces

[puffin02]

Is the moon proof of God's creation. Answer........

no.

[givemeblowjob69]

@puffin02 LOLLLLLLLL hahahahha

[666nonbeliever]

The moon has receded at different rates over the past billion years the fact that science is trying to verify theses rates of orbital regression does not mean that "god" did it. I find it funny that when it is brought up that science is still trying to figure something out the religious types try to stuff god in the cracks and call it proof.

[ChristiansofAsia]

Thanks for the info!

[EvolutionLIE]

scientist who 'speculate' (make up stories) re: how moon got there etc...should become 'Fiction' Writers. their speculations are not less than embarrassing for them and real 'science' ie. math, chemistry etc.

evolutionary scientists are simply philosophers of the worst kind.

[evanom2]

Do scientist still validate the theory of a meteor hitting the earth so hard it knocked a huge chunk of it which floated into the orbit and gradually formed into a pearl of a perfectly white round satellite? That theory is so irrational, illogical and impossible on all levels. (Kinda reminds me of the men-from-apes theory.) I hope they have something better by now.

[korzon]

I was taught in school orbits naturaly decay.Guess they lied or diddnt know what they were talking about.Not to mention there would have been 20ft of dust the lander would have been submerged in if in fact the moon was that old.Thats what the scientists don't understand either there are 2 Factors in that prove in fact it is not as old as they say.I doubt with the rate they put the earth spinning could even sustain life they would have to speed it up quite a bit,There would be no gravity.

[sweatytoothmadman]

"have been 20ft of dust the lander would have been submerged"

Actually that is a lie that creationists made up in fact go look it up on Answers in Genesis under arguments you should not use.

[korzon]

@sweatytoothmadman No i heard scientists arguing over it.Not to mention they have 3 different theories on how the moon got there.What's youre theory on that?I can Honestly say i don't know.Some say we were hit by a nother body in space some say it formed out of the earth.Ans some i won't even mention because they are rediculous.But last i was taught in the 80's when i graduated the answer was they diddn't know for sure.So what's the theory now?

[sweatytoothmadman]

"No i heard scientists arguing over it"

No you didn't, look it up on answers and geneis it was made up by either Sutterfield or Morris using cherry picked data.

"What's youre theory on that"

Well it doesn't involve a magical being poofing it there.

Go look up the 20 ft of moon dust argument, you people need to get up to speed.

[korzon]

@sweatytoothmadman So how did the moon get there?Thats my question as for the moon dust fine lets say they are liars.I told you my intrest and that is how did the moon get there?Forget about cherry picking just answer the question please.Here i am asking you something instead of arguing because i never got an answer from any books because they all have their own idea's.So what's the excepted one for evolutionists?How did the moon get there?

[korzon]

@sweatytoothmadman As for the dust thing i am not done with investigating it and only saw one vid on it.I would rather get a book on the data we collected from the moon itself first but i doubt they would give me any to check out for myself so i will have to reley on other outside sources scince Nasa doesn't give out that data.Because i searched Nasa's website and they have no data on it and don't even refute the claim themselves.And they were the ones there and they should know if anybody.

[SofaKingLoaded]

@sweatytoothmadman Dude forget the moon dust.. read his comments again.. korzon actually thinks gravity is due to the Earth's rotation.. it's simply unbelievable.

[mifster83]

One of the problems with linear thinking is that you take what currently is, whitout any reference to the past, and then make calculations and predictions. Its like looking at car driving around and then take one measurement of the car's velocity, and then make a prediction of when it will arrive at a certain location.

Have the presenter actually looked at the tidal rhythmites before making this video? or is he trying to appeal to a mass audience with no interest to think?

[YourBrainOnReligion]

Utter retardation.

talkorigins(.)org/faqs/moonrec­(.)html --- should anyone actually be interested in the scientific facts regarding this garbage video.

[BereanBeacon1]

@YourBrainOnReligion The lips of the righteous know what is acceptable: but the mouth of the wicked speaketh frowardness. Proverbs 10:32

[YourBrainOnReligion]

@BereanBeacon1 Great rebuttal to the scientific refutation presented.

[ktorch]

You try with more lies!

[Barachem]

Great vid, another piece of evidence for creation.

God bless.

[sweatytoothmadman]

How is this proof that god exist? If that is true it only proves a younger date for the earth it says nothing about the existence of a intelligent all powerful being. 

[4570sharps]

@sweatytoothmadman (PART1) God is the Creator of all things, and as such, is the necessary and ultimate precondition for all things which means He and His Word cannot be “proved” to exist/be true like anything else in creation – precisely because He is not part of creation; His unique existence is first required for “proof” and the entire process of proving or substantiating anything at all.

[4570sharps]

@sweatytoothmadman (PART2) The Christian God must exist if a creation exists, if knowledge is possible and objective truth exists and if there are objective moral norms. We cannot NOT assume God without making arbitrary, in principle, absolutely everything created.

[NOMCCBAMA]

@sweatytoothmadman It does present a quandary for evolutionist. If the world isn't billions of years old then there is less time for life to have supposedly emerged from a rock.

[sweatytoothmadman]

And that is exactly my point if you disprove evolution all you have done is contradict evolution. It does not mean the defualt wins you still need to prove your argument. That is all.

[NOMCCBAMA]

@sweatytoothmadman The fact that the Jews have passed the stories of Moses down for generations for 4000 years is proof that GOD exists. The fact that the 4000 year old prophecies of JESUS the Messiah coming, dieing on the cross. And his religion filling the earth being fulfilled are proof that GOD exist.. The 4000 year old prophesy of Israel becoming a state again being fulfilled are proof that GOD exist.