Red hot pools of molten steel

[FuriousPumpkin]

didn't sound like the guy ever said molten steel

[kenfo0]

@FuriousPumpkin EXACTLY. It is a case of "finding what they want to find". These CREEPS w/their DELUSIONS of GRANDEUR! They can barely get through a high school experience in which people are passed JUST TO GET RID OF THEM, and yet, having watched a few YT vids, they are now metallurgists, engineers, physicists, etc. It is frightening, really. Metal is red hot. "OMG THAT MEANS MELTED STEEL!!!!!". Uh, no dipshits. I can heat hardened iron red hot in my back yard fire, but it won't melt.

[TimReed22222]

Am I the only one who's noticed that the description of this video - "WTC workers describe pools of molten steel at Ground Zero" - is FALSE? At NO point in this video do I see workers describing pools of molten steel! Doesn't happen.

So why tell a lie like that?

[ed11561]

Where is the end of this video?I remember watching it years ago-when u could see the guy pulling out molten,dripping metal-be it steel-iron whatever.The end has been cut off & i can't find it anywhere-anymore.Does anyone have the full film? Thanks in advance.

[tubeshok]

CBC TVs Fifth Estate Program Airs AE911Truth Nov 27 - The producers of the National Geographic Channel assured us that they would air the evidence we highlighted for them on their show 9/11: Science and Conspiracy. They even showed us these segments in their "rough cut," which we were quite satisfied with. However, the final show aired none of our evidence, and they claimed that we had none. We were determined not to let this happen a second time with the CBC.

[katyu16]

rookstone, boloboffin:

Keep in mind this vid was shot SIX WEEKS after the collapse.

Check this out. Firemen mentioning molten steel. Is THAT good enough for you?

watch?v=YqNugYbZX7E&feature=re­lated

[lazzo000]

Those firemen were refering to the molten aluminum flowing the tower shortly after the plane impact. They mistakenly thought it was steel. watch

"9/11 Debunked: 'Molten Metal' Explained"

[lazzo000]

Also, use a little common sense. If the people in THIS video knew it wasn't molten steel six weeks after the collapse, then you know the material flowing from the tower ON 9/11 couldn't have been molten steel either because steel dosen't melt that fast.

And don't say "It was thermate/nanothermate" Thermate reactions don't last 6 weeks, what we see in this video is just fire.

Stop being so gullible

[jbnumba1]

The heat from the amount of thermate needed would definitely last that long.

[lazzo000]

Oh, so I take you're an expert on thermate? Even so, you would still have to base it on the assumption that thermate was there to begin with. In addition to the fact that there is absolutley no evidence of thermate in the WTC, there is just no way that someone secretly planted thousands of pounds of thermate in the building and busted out the drywall so it can be attached to the exposed steel all without anyone noticing.

[jbnumba1]

It's not an assumption at all, it is a physical necessity that an incendiary was used because there was FOR A FACT molten steel, a lot of it, which cannot happen from hydrocarbon fires. Beyond that, the rubble was 1100F 8 weeks later; once again not possible if there wasn't an incendiary used.

[jbnumba1]

But all of that is besides the fact that unignited chips of thermite and nanothermite were found in multiple samples of the dust that blanketed NY. What you're doing is anti-science - starting with your conclusiong (that it would be impossible to pull off) and working backward from there.

[lazzo000]

Sorry but Niels Harrit's "thermate discovery" is a load of crap. To see a detailed explaination of why it's wrong google: " final word on niels harrit nanothermate"

And the accounts of "molten steel" can be misleading. Many use the terms "molten steel" and "molten metal" interchangeably. And many use the terms to describe pieces of glowing red-orange steel that is not in a full liquid state. See 911myths . com

[jbnumba1]

No, the places you're pointing me are a "load of crap" aka propaganda meant to disinform and continue the coverup. All 3 towers feel at free fall speed into the greatest path of resistance. This can only happen if thousands of supports are taken out simultaneously as was the case.

[lazzo000]

I can't believe you're still rehashing the same dubious claims that were disproven years ago. None of the towers fell at "free-fall speed". So any atempt to explain these things other than "911 was an inside job" is propaganda? It doesn't get more anti-science than that.

I can play this game too. Did you know that the sky is really green? Yup, the blue color we see is made by secret super machines in Area 51. Anyone who tells you otherwise is part of the coverup!

[MrBoredatwork]

Give up lazzo. I am starting to think that no matter how much the claims get debunked they will either side step the material and move to something else and if they get pinned, they can always get out by saying it is all part of a cover up or that the people who debunk it are part of the government conspiracy. They can make those claims with NO basis for it. Prove to me that the makers of the debunking sites are part of the cover up. Truthers have lost touch with reality.

[JLaw012]

@jbnumba1. Actually its a proven FACT that thermite cannot cut a core column sideways/horizontally. I challenge you to prove otherwise.

Also, regarding molten metal since thermites are a fast burning incendiary it would not leave a pool of molten metal for days on end after the collapse the only thing that could keeps steel in a molten state for days on end is a very hot fire. Thermite burns out quickly and metal goes cold quickly.

[JBushMusic]

@JLaw012 Please explain to me where the unignited chips of nanothermite, found in at least 4 independent dust samples, came from. Proven fact that thermite can't cut a core column sideways/horizontally? Show me your source which allegedly proves this. What IS a proven fact is that hydrocarbon fires (jet fuel is a hydrocarbon) are not hot enough to melt steel. As a matter of fact, at their peak (oxygen supplied) temperature hydrocarbon fires are still almost 1000 deg F lower than melting steel.

[JLaw012]

@JBushMusic. For one thing you are ASSUMING they were found.

1. The person who alledgely got the samples was not licensed to handle HAZMAT's, she is an artist who is a conspiracy theorist.

2. there is no paperwork of security letting someone in the fenced in area to take samples.

3. No one let an independent lab verify the samples.

YOU are taking Steven Jones WORD for it, no proof whatsoever.

Nat Geo proved thermite can't do it, i suggest YOU prove Nano can since regular thermite cannot.

[kenfo0]

@JLaw012 Nano-thermite (n-t) became fruit-loops "weapon of choice" AFTER thermite and thermate couldn't cut it. n-t is much more powerful than thermite, and yet that is in NO WAY proof that it was used in a plot. Dipshits with delusions of grandeur who barely got out of the JOKE that is high school and college are suddenly experts in metallurgy, physics and such. Think my claim of DoGs is over the top? Check polls in which people rate themselves highly in math ability, yet are quite poor.

[JLaw012]

@kenfo0, yes i know. NT is total nonsense there is no device capable of shooting thermite horizontally threw a column of a skyscraper. Which is why that is my first request to these idiot "truthers" who cannot even show evidence that it would work.

[kenfo0]

@JBushMusic LOL...always with the "show me the source". YOU show ME the "sources" of "unignited chips of n-t". You can't. Show where someone can show a chain of evidence (you don't even know what that is, you will google it)? You can't. Show where anything you claim has been verified by someone NOT writing a "I know the TROOTH about 911" book or a known conspiracy theorist? You can't. You make a false statement "molten steel",then use facts "HC fires aren't hot enough" to make it seem true.

[rookstone]

"Looks like an oven"

"Red Hot"

No mention of "molten steel"

try again.

[boloboffin]

No one describes anything like "pools of molten steel" in this video. There were fires under the debris that heated the steel beams. That's all this is talking about.

There has never been any evidence of "pools of molten steel".

[jkear2004]

"There has never been any evidence of "pools of molten steel". "

- right........ keep telling yourself that