Also do you need to see alot of stars with the naked eye? such as the center of the milkyway? and no haze from any direction right? all ink dark skies?
@vwlover94 Yeah, being able to tell where the milkyway is w/ the naked eye is a good indicator of atmospheric conditions. But best and easiest feedback is to take shot and look at the camera's lcd.
When conditions are good those previews tend to draw a wow! since the camera exposure accumulates a lot of light over time.
@mschilder123 Ok thanks, ill go somewhere darker next time, and ill probably get a wide angle lens, and ill probably go to bakersfield,ca or very near, i remember one time i drove their and as the other cars where passing by the opposite way, i was still able to see the center of the milkyway even though lights from the cars where hitting my eye, thats how dark it is over their, :D
Great views of Yosemite! We, in Yosemite, are covered in snow now. So Much Snow! Amazing how the seasons dramatically change Yosemite each year. It is an amazing place. Check out our channel on Yosemite. Just click on our name here =>
Again thank you for taking us/ me to such places. I am doing just only music and now enjoying your great videos which is great reminder that the world is more than music .
@WrongLover I have the 50/1.4 and did a test shot at iso 3200, f/1.4, 10 seconds at a moonless night in a remote area. Plenty stars.
So the trick is remote area, as high in elevation as possible. Any pollution / haze / fog / cloud layer in the sky kills stars. From a city, or any populated area really, no chance of milkyway sightings, sadly.
No need for bulb mode, use manual for up to 30 second exposures. And a tripod ;-)
@mschilder123 and i have a highend point and shoot and shoot at raw, from my panasonic lumix fz100,. but here is my problem, last night i went to Castaic lake,CA and the level of darkness is orange from the white to black chart (google it) and i barely barely saw the cygnus constellation and put my tripod on the floor look up and snap away using these settings
@mschilder123 (my camera has noise issues of course small sensor)F2.8 24mm wide, 45sec shutter, iso 400 and manual focus, but i got the L.A and San Fernando valley haze and got horrible results , so do you recommend a better camera, a better darker location ? Or both :D
@WrongLover yes, get away from urban areas and light pollution and you will see more stars. You should be able to see them somewhat with the naked eye. Clear, cold winter nights are the best time because there is less "noise" in the atmosphere.
wow very awe inspiring. its crazy to think all those stars look like one speck of light in the distance. AND we dont live in a particularly special galaxy. there are many like it.
Super cool shot! I'm guessing that there was a 10 second dark frame subtraction performed by the camera after every shot, which would account for that 20sec frame interval with a 10sec exposure. Also, what were you using for an intervalometer?
@jcmegabyte no dark frame subtract used, noise wasn't bad for the 10sec. The dark frame subtract might keep the sensor hot, and add more noise over time? I use the canon tc80n3.
Cool - thanks for the info :-) I've been considering the 5D2 for its sensitivity and clarity, but the shutter lifespan is a slight concern - I can easily shoot 3000-5000 frames on a good day/night, so I'd have to use it only for the best shots!
@mschilder123 I see. Thanks for reply. 5 stars for you, amazing video. Especially a very big star at the end. Which star is it (name)? Do you know? Polestar?
Wow, the lighting is amazing. What settings did you use to shoot this on your camera? I have a Nikon D5000 and unfortunately,y it won't let me use the intervalometer unless I have it set to auto, so I can't manually adjust the aperture and such. :(
What did you use to shoot this? The apature must be been totally cranked yet there seems to be very little grain! It's a great shot, just curious how you pulled it off.
it's so cool, it's like we're we're sittin on a natural sightseeing spot for the cosmos.
SVTcoolguy 5 months ago
Also do you need to see alot of stars with the naked eye? such as the center of the milkyway? and no haze from any direction right? all ink dark skies?
vwlover94 7 months ago
@vwlover94 Yeah, being able to tell where the milkyway is w/ the naked eye is a good indicator of atmospheric conditions. But best and easiest feedback is to take shot and look at the camera's lcd.
When conditions are good those previews tend to draw a wow! since the camera exposure accumulates a lot of light over time.
mschilder123 7 months ago
@mschilder123 Ok thanks, ill go somewhere darker next time, and ill probably get a wide angle lens, and ill probably go to bakersfield,ca or very near, i remember one time i drove their and as the other cars where passing by the opposite way, i was still able to see the center of the milkyway even though lights from the cars where hitting my eye, thats how dark it is over their, :D
vwlover94 7 months ago
brilliant....no words to describe....
inappro 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Great views of Yosemite! We, in Yosemite, are covered in snow now. So Much Snow! Amazing how the seasons dramatically change Yosemite each year. It is an amazing place. Check out our channel on Yosemite. Just click on our name here =>
yosemitevacations 10 months ago
does this happen yearly or can you see it every day?
Narutohi67 1 year ago
That was simply beautiful
PokemontrainerNelly 1 year ago
Again thank you for taking us/ me to such places. I am doing just only music and now enjoying your great videos which is great reminder that the world is more than music .
Thank you. Will subscribe and visit your Chanel.
RMAOA 1 year ago
Simply incredible.
Jadistk 1 year ago
Great work! I tried to do something like this but without effect, because I have too dark lenses and ISO 1600 was not enough.
xlace 1 year ago
I hate myself doing it :(
I have the 5D and 50mm 1.4 and I can't get to see more than 4 stars in the sky :S
anything I need to know?
I set it to Bulb mode and the iso to 3200 f/1.4 and hold it for 10 sec.
help...
WrongLover 1 year ago
@WrongLover I have the 50/1.4 and did a test shot at iso 3200, f/1.4, 10 seconds at a moonless night in a remote area. Plenty stars.
So the trick is remote area, as high in elevation as possible. Any pollution / haze / fog / cloud layer in the sky kills stars. From a city, or any populated area really, no chance of milkyway sightings, sadly.
No need for bulb mode, use manual for up to 30 second exposures. And a tripod ;-)
mschilder123 1 year ago
@mschilder123 wow that was even helpfull information for me!!!
vwlover94 7 months ago
@mschilder123 and i have a highend point and shoot and shoot at raw, from my panasonic lumix fz100,. but here is my problem, last night i went to Castaic lake,CA and the level of darkness is orange from the white to black chart (google it) and i barely barely saw the cygnus constellation and put my tripod on the floor look up and snap away using these settings
vwlover94 7 months ago
@mschilder123 (my camera has noise issues of course small sensor)F2.8 24mm wide, 45sec shutter, iso 400 and manual focus, but i got the L.A and San Fernando valley haze and got horrible results , so do you recommend a better camera, a better darker location ? Or both :D
vwlover94 7 months ago
@vwlover94 Don't forget a faster lens ;-)
L.A. smog is good for dramatic sunsets in Joshua Tree, not so much for stargazing.
mschilder123 7 months ago
@WrongLover yes, get away from urban areas and light pollution and you will see more stars. You should be able to see them somewhat with the naked eye. Clear, cold winter nights are the best time because there is less "noise" in the atmosphere.
phoric 1 year ago
nice
maidongst 1 year ago
if i could i would fly up there and just explore...
marlo1204 1 year ago
wow very awe inspiring. its crazy to think all those stars look like one speck of light in the distance. AND we dont live in a particularly special galaxy. there are many like it.
ianbrooks 1 year ago
I hope that i could see this breathtaking sight in my real live. Just one night there. It's one of my dreams. :)
Maudzer 1 year ago
Super cool shot! I'm guessing that there was a 10 second dark frame subtraction performed by the camera after every shot, which would account for that 20sec frame interval with a 10sec exposure. Also, what were you using for an intervalometer?
jcmegabyte 1 year ago
@jcmegabyte no dark frame subtract used, noise wasn't bad for the 10sec. The dark frame subtract might keep the sensor hot, and add more noise over time? I use the canon tc80n3.
mschilder123 1 year ago
Cool - thanks for the info :-) I've been considering the 5D2 for its sensitivity and clarity, but the shutter lifespan is a slight concern - I can easily shoot 3000-5000 frames on a good day/night, so I'd have to use it only for the best shots!
jcmegabyte 1 year ago
The bright "star" in the end is Jupiter.
HeligasteHelvete 1 year ago
Why trees didn't move? No wind? Or faked trees? :P
elugwilith 1 year ago
yeah, pretty much no wind. At least not near the ground. And those clouds weren't moving too fast themselves.
mschilder123 1 year ago
@mschilder123 I see. Thanks for reply. 5 stars for you, amazing video. Especially a very big star at the end. Which star is it (name)? Do you know? Polestar?
elugwilith 1 year ago
Probably Sirius. It looks like cross due to coma, optical aberration.
On this hemisphere stars appear to rotate around the Polestar.
mschilder123 1 year ago
Wow, the lighting is amazing. What settings did you use to shoot this on your camera? I have a Nikon D5000 and unfortunately,y it won't let me use the intervalometer unless I have it set to auto, so I can't manually adjust the aperture and such. :(
Philiwily 2 years ago
what is the red thing in the very beginning?! drag the player all to the left and don't press start..
YoureyMedia 2 years ago
airplane
mschilder123 2 years ago
oh ok.. nice video btw!
YoureyMedia 2 years ago
i have never in my 23 years of life seen the milky way, i wish id see it....
rage666956 2 years ago
fav'd
netsoj 2 years ago
there you can see more stars than in finland. (but maybe is is cause i live third biggest city so the light .... )
Miqimus 2 years ago
amazing
naguleader 2 years ago
wooah truly amazing !
What Camera did you use to Timelapse this ?
iArchonius 2 years ago
my god, it's full of stars.
youtubedude 2 years ago
Cool!
neuromonkey 2 years ago
That was absolutely fascinating. Well done.
Codaflow 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This was so boring.
maritoruiz00 2 years ago
pay attention to the naked girls in front of the trees next time
mschilder123 2 years ago
now THAT is an awesome timelapse.
woopzitwasme 2 years ago
awesome
Nocalas 2 years ago
wow its amazing looking at those many stars.. I want to go camping far away from city life jus to look at stars
chintupawan 2 years ago
are we looking inwards to the centre, or out to the one of the spiral arms?
shakeyphil 2 years ago
love it. looking into space boggles my mind. our planet becomes entirely insignificant.
RecipeCollector 2 years ago
wspaniały film!
ipodroznik 2 years ago
Are you sure you weren't looking south? :)
kiloechokilo 2 years ago
Yeah, the milkyway movement suggests as much, doesn't it? I was guessing based on the campsite and road. Clearly it was pointed south-ish.
mschilder123 2 years ago
What did you use to shoot this? The apature must be been totally cranked yet there seems to be very little grain! It's a great shot, just curious how you pulled it off.
dash1011 2 years ago
yep i am also wondering how it was done : )
tsutomukun 2 years ago
See 'more info' on the top left, has the relevant camera settings.
Took the JPGs straight from camera, picture style 'landscape'.
Quite amazing how much light iso3200 at f/1.4 for 10 seconds collects..
mschilder123 2 years ago