ive spent 4 and a half minutes watching this, way too much time, at least i didnt spend x amount of time making video, i worry that all u will do is assist sending nutjobs to this cube site and as they want this sort of stuff 2 have meaning they will go along with it.i can understand ur frustration but some people if u fly them into space to see the planet will still pronounce world is flat. ahhhhhh now spent 8 and half minutes on subject, is it an addiction?
Well considering this video demonstrates definitively the flaw in observational selection, I'd say it's an educational video on how NOT to waste your time with stuff like this. And a 4.5 minute video and 4 minute response hardly qualifies as an addiction - it's education and discussion.
Why don't you look at a proper astronomical Ephemeris instead of relying on astrolog? BTW - I like your analysis - looks very much like a promotion. Even if you don't like it you are advertising it for me, the only vids I want you to remove are the one about the planetary alignment and where you mention my old channel etc by name. I'd so appreciate it.
LOL - that took a while didn't it? So why didn't you agressively promote that like a religion - like you did with astrolog? Is that because you didn't understand till I pointed it out?
Do a search for 'Annual almanac of celestial events' and it will take you to a web page that shows an expanded farmer's almanac type view of the planetary circumstances. You can scroll year to year.
NASA Reference Publication 1349 contains an ephemeris from 1995 t0 2010 that's pretty good.
'online ephemeris' returns 150,000 links, so I bet you can find what YOU are looking for there. And what are you looking for again?
Nothing BB - I am just making a point that all your info comes from the internet or Astrolog . You are hilarious! As soon as I point out Astrolog is Astrology you go on a search for a proper astronomical ephemeris... its priceless really!! HAHAHA. But me.. no.. I'm not looking for anything , I just went with an opinion thats all, just a small mistake. You've made some as well but don't like to admit it do you? DO YOU? Well its not about what I said or didn't say anymore ... its about you..
How about your Wonderful World of Shirley Anderson site that has a link to the WONDERFUL WORLD OF MARK ALEXANDER ANDERSON (My wonderful Brother) on it. How dull.
The brother that you claim that you don't have, Is that one that I shouldn't point to either? The one where it STILL talks about planets aligning on?
Now its about you being a total prat and not listening - not being a decent person. Each post you put up, each horrible message you send to my friends, each nasty thing you do is only making you look worse and worse.. and thats what I'm looking for and everyone else. Keep digging your hole.. you'll fall into it one day.
remember BB you attacked me agressively and then portrayed to other people that you were the victim and you still do. Is that why you don't have a partner? Do you always make out that you're a victim when you were the one who attacked? Were you always the school bully?
When you come across as an arrogant condescending prat like you do, people will not listen to you - thats why I don't. I think you're a horrible old man with a grudge. When people visit your site or channel, even if they agree with you - you argue, if they are nice to you, you argue. You only respond favourably to other people who are as condescending as you are.
Search for "wonderful world of shirley anderson", you see her page and my 2012: Massive Planetary Alignment vid. At "The Wonderful World of Shirley Anderson" you will see
"In the year 2012 there will be a galactic alignment of planets heralding the age of Aquarius."
"The plan is that on the Winter Solstice of 2012 - December 21st at 11:11am when the planets align, at various gatherings all over the world people"...
BTW - I am doing alright for hits. But you know BB there are people on youtube who have been here less of the time you have and they have thousands of subscribersdon't they? Maybe you should try to be a bit more like them instead of ..well.. what you are. I do pity you and one day I hope you'll see the error of your ways, that may be a long time off though I suspect.
Furthermore, I do have another internet site, and youtube channel which does have over a thousand subscribers, and my website is really starting to pay off and I'm earning enough money now to fund other projects and you should be seeing my books on the shelves in bookstores quite soon. But if you think I'm daft enough to tell you who I really am - think again. You'll just have to find out won't you?
I can tell you're grasping at straws now. Messaging my friends was neither big nor clever and it shows you are so scared and frightened of losing an argument you'll do anything won't you? It backfired pal! That just makes you look bad . I thought you would have understood a thing like that - oh wait no.. not YOU that would be asking too much.
Jealousy will get you nowhere - I hope you are aware how angry and idiotic you look right now. How petty and stupid...again quoting things I've already answered for. What do you want then? Everyone can now see you're an asshole. I'll look forward to your book - if you're getting that many hits then a book should be easy for you shouldn't it? I wonder why no publisher will take you on? Could be your attitude I suppose.
Why don't you give me the names of these discussion groups so I can give my side of the argument - oh wait you just want to gossip and stuff don't you?
Could it be the reason you aren't giving me the names of so called forums because you keep getting yourself banned for having a bad attitude and a mental health problem? Tried Anger management? I hear they have some interesting techniques these days.
Its ok I know you're only angry because you feel humiliated, that you didn't realise you were only using software good for astrology and that you didn't expect me to know that. Don't take too much offense - we all make mistakes, you make tons of them, like not being able to see geometric shapes like tetrahedrons - thats ok you're not an artist, you're a jealous misguided fool with a few grudges, thats all. I don't fault you for it, the unenlightened such as yourself often make such mistakes.
That's right, I'm gossiping (and stuff) with Physics Phd's and the person who developed the Astrolog software, not discussing someone who admits that they are no good at math or physics or astronomy, yet routinely makes broad proclamations about planetary positions, not knowing of what she speaks. I bet you couldn't keep up there.
Again, if you mean tight grouping, say that instead of straight line. People will understand you.
So Digitalglass, were you applying for the position of junior debator or were you interested in the master debator position, cause the way you talk makes me HOT. What are you wearing right now? Mmm.
So Digitalglass, were you applying for the position of junior debator or were you interested in the master debator position, cause the way you talk makes me HOT. What are you wearing right now? Mmm.
I average hits a day on the front page of my DC Symbols site, and I am linked to Digitalglass158 there and elsewhere, and she still can't get hits on her youtube channel. She does however friend and subscribe to herlself as Shilx1. (If the truth be told, I believe that should read 3x.)
"You get hits because I go there to find things you've said so I can annoy you about them."
I have posted my site statistics on my front page so that you can check them. My front page got 150 hits in 24 hours yesterday. My total site hits yesterday was 592 hits.
I bet YOU didn't account for many of those Shirl. Or the400 plus hits I got every other day this week, over 500 again on the 27th. How you doin hit wise?
"Actually the event that occurred in 1983 was that the planets (all eight of them -- we are on the ninth, Earth) would be within 96° of each other in the sky -- not in a straight line as most people would misinterpret with the term alignment. To have all of the planets on the same side of the Sun and virtually all within the same quadrant (i.e., 90°) happens approximately once every 200 years --
Well done - you can also copy and paste - why didn't you credit the site you got that info from? Surely you didn't think of that yourself - especially when its near word-perfect as to what was written on the site.
I said Google, so it is clearly from the front page where I googled. The prob is that links don't work here, but YOU could Google as I suggested, and as I did.
You just sit back and continue to show yer donkey, as we say here, Shirl.
Oh you said GOOGLE wow. Didn't tell us you'd simply copied and pasted your info which is what you've done all along. Look more copy and paste, lol. If you ever work out anything for yourself then you have the authority to criticise others... now, you've clearly shown you havent. You got all your info from Astrolog - Astrology software, not Astronomy. You copied and pasted your info from other sites.
":It automatically configures a persons star sign and birth chart... thats why its called Astrolog"
Don't stop now Shirl, you are on a definite roll. So it's no good for just seeing where the planets are at a given moment. Maybe you could point us to some that works better, and we can check again with that?
Right so you think when I said straight lines I meant absolutely straight - ah says a lot that does. Even I know they never align absolutely straight - after all the stars appear as moving in an elipse. What do you expect to accomplish here anyway?
I believe you are getting confused with these alignments. As there is a 1 in a billion or so chance that the planets will ever align in a straight line then its practically impossible. The alignments (any) are never exact. If you are now suggesting I said THAT - sorry babe - picture was not mine. That pic you have from my vid was again taken from another source.
picture was not mine. That pic you have from my vid was again taken from another source.
she speaks here of an image that I took from her video that she used to illustrate the idea that the planets were all going to be in a line in DEC 2012. I axed her over and over abt that.
And again, speaking of 2000 and 1983 she says specifically, and repeats, 'straight lines', does she not? Don't say straight lines if that's not what you mean.
You didn't ask me you harrassed me for months about it - and I defended myself - big mistake there huh? Next thing I know you are using my words in the wrong context - you're sick you know that? As for straight lines - they were as straight as they'll ever get - ok? Make it clear for you huh? Spell it out in baby language shall I? You were saying those conjunctions never happened weren't you? Cos you got your info from Astrolog..lol.
No, you wouldn't leave me alone and you harrassed me into it. I defended that I'd found the info elsewhere and put it in my video, thats what I've always said.
In the fall Shirl was proclaiming all the planets would align in a line in Dec 2012. Now she says they already aligned in May of 2000.
"Big Bytes thinks I laid claim to any ideas about 2012, wrong, I simply related info from other sources. The alignment of planets in a straight line happened in May 7th 2000. This is ERA 2012."
Look it up or download 'Astrolog' which is freeware. Why doesn't she check before speaking?
LOL.. I didn't claim anything of the sort - you got mixed up BB. I never ever laid claim to that idea - I said to you and others as well that I had found this from other sources and it was what others had been saying. Proclaiming ... pppffffttt... I never did. I was trying to organise an event not proclaim something. And they did already align, May 2000 and before that in 1983 straight lines....
If you think it was ME who said any of this stuff at all you might want to tell John Major Jenkins that he's been plagerising my work, how about that eh? Other people on the internet plagerised him and added their own perceptions. All I wanted to do was organise an event - a meditation. I was under the impression it was a fact- I'll grant you that but I NEVER made it up or am the author of the ideas.
As for looking up things in Astrolog - I might if you didn't force it on me like some religion. You should take your irrelevant videos down and behave better than you have been. Its a complete lie to say that I laid claim to these ideas. I said from the beginning.. the VERY beginning they were from other sources.
"As for looking up things in Astrolog - I might if you didn't force it on me like some religion"
Shirl, you mean you won't even look the next time to keep from saying the wrong things over and over? I don't care if YOU don't look. I like it even better, because then you don't know when you are right or wrong, because you clearly are not conversant in astronomical terms.
OK, line ups in 2000 and 1983. Any more claims? Friends, please look these up, but don't tell her what you find out.
Are you getting all your info from Astrolog? Yes please look these up because I did - not to appease this idiot but to see for myself rather than what other people are saying. I ask again BB did you get all your info from Astrolog?
DC I did this - um... sorry to burst your bubble but that astrolog is very very inaccurate... I'm sorry I thought you were actually smart but slightly off cue... I apologise, I was wrong about you, you are actually getting all your info from this. I find it rather tragic and wish you all the best. Don't answer, I'd rather find someone who knew what they were talking about.
"The main planetary calculation routines used in this program havebeen Copyrighted and the core of this program is basically aconversion to C of the routines created by James Neely as listed inMichael Erlewine's 'Manual of Computer Programming for Astrologers',
available from Matrix Software. The copyright gives us permission touse the routines for personal use but not to sell them or profit from
Look love, I concede that I was under the impression there was gonna be an alignment of planets in 2012 - I was just relaying other sources. the 2000 and 1983 alignments are well documented - so I can only conclude that free software you got off the internet is a lousy way to read the stars isn't it? I still want to organise a big meditation event, I want it to coincide with movements in the heavens to give it some significance.
The planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn all congregate near the Sun during late April and early May 2000. The Moon will join them for a couple of days. The tightest grouping of these six bodies will occur on May 5, when the Moon and planets spread across 25 degrees of sky -- a little more than the width of an outspread palm held at arm's length. The tightest grouping of the planets alone occurs on May 17, when they will span about 20 degrees.
I admit I do want to organise a record breaking meditation event - its a bit ambitious I know, but I'd like to try, without any interference from you. I'd like it if you want to join in though, would be nice.
The implication here is that she does not check what6 she proclaims with a chart or a book. As she says now, what she speaks is what she "had found from other sources". So in general, she "was trying to organize an event not proclaim something".
But she needed a 'hook', something to pull people in, so she picked planets aligning. Which she never checked in months, like she doesn't want to look at May 2000 right now, or 83.
squeeze me? How could I have animated images of the planets that I captured from Astrolog on my Facing the Future (that's Facing the Future) page, if I dint have a working copy?
He means the ones where he made a mistake about Tons Brunes work being "copied" which it wasn't, because we'd never even heard of him before Big Bytes started shouting about it. The Anderson cube is a universal shape which is what I was saying in the first place.
Also, this coming from a man who can't see a tetrahedron when its right in front of his face, who accused me of "time travel" and scaremongering and follows me around messaging people about me, and putting them off - so there you go.
Thing about this video is - you CAN place any image on it and Jenei just proved it. Kind of goes against the statement "You can't just superimpose any image on it and think it has some cosmic significance" Disproved own statement.
You're missing the point. Who would ever claim that there was any cosmic significance to transformers? It's ridiculous. Find me a substrate that ONLY depicts biblical images or ONLY occult images and I'm sold. THAT would be a unique, cosmically special shape. There isn't one.
Why would it only be cosmically special if only one type of image (occult) could be traced on it. Because all images can be traced on this matrix, that makes it more special. Google MERKABAH and you'll understand what I'm talking about.
Still doesn't answer the question - why are only occult images significant? I think the people missing the point are you two, lol, its hilarious really.
Loaded question. Occult images AREN'T significant. If they were, they would be the only images to show up. Instead, we've got transformers and power rangers. To claim that an "anderson cube" is special simply because occult and biblical symbols show up in it would also require you to admit that transformers and power rangers and cosmically significant. Is that what you want?
Don't you think anything that is designed by the human mind (including power rangers and transformers) is cosmically significant? Do you even realise what goes into designing anything? Yes of course they are - all around you is art, all of it came from the mind of human beings,and you sit there in your ignorance..
BTW I've never heard such rot - if they were significat they would be the only images to show up.,. haha.. what planet are you from? I'm a trained designer and design is all about geometry. I never claimed occult images were the only images on there - just that they can be traced on there.
Please get your arguments together. It really shows that you post impulsively, with little thought about what you're saying. The fact of the matter is, transformers AREN'T cosmically significant. And, as you've just admitted, occult images aren't the only images to show up - they are therefore not unique to this shape. Tell me. Wouldn't it really be something if occult images WERE the only ones to show up? What would that mean?
What? Is your ego so big you can't see past it or what? I NEVER said they were the only images that could be traced on there. Transformers are cosmically significant as is everything designed by the human mind. The lack of thought is coming from your side (and that fool who doesn't even know what a tetrahedron is ) the reason its called sacred geometry is because of its many properties.
Firstly, do you admit that neither the occult nor religion have any more significance than transformers as far as "sacred geometry" is involved?
Also, do you acknowledge the possibility that the only reason all images fit into things like the anderson cube is because of its diverse shape? Consider the screen you're looking at. It's a grid made of several pixels. It's capable of displaying anything. Does that make a grid sacred geometry?
Nope - occult and religious symbols have a psychological affect that cartoons and childrens programmes do not have. yes it is a diverse shape, how is that going against what I originally said?
Because the only reason occult and religious symbols show up is the same reason why cartoons show up. Like a grid, that shape is so diverse, ANY image will appear - significant or not.
Also BB - you know about Geometry (supposedly) don't you? You're a bit of a hypocrite really because Sacred Geometry doesn't just apply to the occult or in your case the DC map or the masons. Geometry is used to design everything.
LOL - doing it again aren't you - the harrassement stalking behaviour.. yeah? Do you know whats really REALLY dumb dc? That you - so great at Geometry (so you think) couldn't even recognise a star tetrahedron when you saw it... lol.. your thesis on Washington DC is wrong, now will you admit that or not?
I did - the site is full of paranoia and statements about how he is not wrong and super- mega explanations about simple sentences. The man is very much afraid of being wrong - so yes if you look at it you'll see what I mean. Perhaps while youre at it you'd like to look at this video V_gzz2xHvA. He's been so wrong about so many things.
No I'm not DC. I didn't say they'd be aligning together like that - you're confusing the issue yourself as usual. These alignments all happen in 2012 and within close proximity - six months.
Is it the alignment, or these alignments , plural?
There you have it positive proof YOU DON'T KNOW. Do you? Are they all part of one big cosmic event or are they separate - remember YOU asked because you YOU don't know do you?
So you admit you have trouble diving.. as you call it.. meanings of things. That explains a lot - you do misunderstand frequently don't you? Don't worry you'll get over it. PS - Thanks for all your hard work on Washington DC - pity you didn't even understand it.
PS - I know you're jealous because I know stuff you have no idea about - lol.. its kinda funny you poring over a silly map and theorising about a power grid when I really know whats going on - haha.
BTW, just because I have things on my own website, doesn't mean I've put these things forward in any sort of argument with you. You picked out statements, you manipulated things, and you pretended that I said them to argue with you - no I didn't. They are on my site and people can think what they like. So why did you take what I said, put it on here as if it was me arguing against you? How dumb can you get? Oh... ?
Please take your videos down. It pains me to stoop to your level like this - I'm used to better things. Just do the decent thing - stop arguing your point and get on with your life how hard can that be.. it must be very very hard for you.
OMG you total liar. Besides DC all I want you to do is remove a couple of videos - why won't you do that? Its just a simple request - and then you'll never hear from me again - simple. If you keep them up it just proves you are out to antagonise me on purpose.
Correction - I asked Jenei for his opinion and wanted him to make this video. I didn't ask for your opinion DC - and there was no need to make several videos explaining how you got the wrong idea when everyone else didn't. Why make a video about your own ignorance?
"And what claim am I making? The burden of proof lies on the one who makes the initial claim. Just because I show disbelief, it is not up to me to show that the claim is false; it is up to those who make the original claim(s) to provide the evidence. And so far, there hasn't been much of the latter going on here..."
So what? I asked for his opinion and he gave it in a nice way - he didn't make four or five videos showing his own ignorance and making whopping mistakes like you did - at least his argument was an intelligent one. From you I just get crap - and you have an agenda - he doesn't.
BTW - the video shows that any symbol can be placed on the matrix - its just that Jenei came to a different conclusion, not that it can't be done. So, again you've misread the whole thing and you are proving that you keep getting the wrong idea - is there something causing this strange perception?
FURTHERMORE... Jenei's video shows that anything can be placed on the matrix - thats THIS VIDEO. The anderson cube as I called it - is always evolving and changing the more I begin to understand it.
Thats enough DC - you are antagonising and starting arguments - there's no point in explaining this to you seeing as you just want to argue rather than do the right thing - remove your videos and stop arguing over nothing. As a matter of fact however once you add the spiral - curvelinear images do appear. Merkabah rotates. That motion is a spiral motion - why don't you read up on it instead of making moronic statements like this.
LOL - he expects now to have proven that I was arguing my point when I made that statement. No I wasn't - just because I say something or state something on my website doesn't mean I am putting it forward during some argument. His accusations, his understandings are all false and unfounded.
Big Bytes seems to have a problem discerning what is an argument and what is not. This is what he wrote on the video entitled "Massive planetary alignment"
"As for arguing the planets were going to align - I didn't"
From "The Wonderful World of Shirley Anderson" - In the year 2012 there will be a galactic alignment of planets heralding the age of Aquarius. The plan is that on the Winter Solstice of 2012 - December 21st at 11:11am when the planets align, at various gatherings all over the world people will go into a communal meditation and vibrate the cosmic "Ommmmm" all at once.
One thing I will say now - the Anderson cube as I named it back then is Merkabah and it revealed itself to me in different forms. Reality is projected onto the Merkabah matrix which surrounds the body and so yes of course everything that exists can be traced within the Anderson cube - my design, my perception of a greater truth.
"everything that exists can be traced within the Anderson cube - my design, my perception of a greater truth. "
How embarrassing to repeat the thesis that the young man attacked initially with this video. That is exactly what he says is NOT the case. Check it out. Look at the movie once.
This is my perception of a far greater truth which is commonly known as Merkabah. How embarrasing for DC that he doesn't understand plain Engish - and yes, everything that exists can be traced upon its matrix. Watch the video - yes it can. DC made yet another embarrasing mistake and misunderstanding. I will add this to my collection.
There you have it friends, whether the ark had two or four cherubim on it is insignificant because no one cares.
There you have it people. My words taken out of context and interpreted wrongly by a diseased mind - proof positive. I can show you a dozen instances of this manipulative behaviour. He interprets facts his way and thinks everyone else is wrong. That is a primative way of thinking.
wings inclined archwise, thus overshadowing the crown of the golden table,
These were winged bulls. Four winged bulls. There were according to this text four winged bulls on the corners of the ark - their heads turned this and that way - and that is EXACTLY what is shown on the Anderson cube EXACTLY. Now you can try and disprove that all you like but I know its true.
No shit.. I never give my real name and sometimes I pretend I'm the opposite sex - in short you don't know whether I'm male, female, if my pics are genuine or if I'm just pretending or what. You're on the internet.
Haha - you are so easy to wind up its unreal. You are very very capable of getting the wrong end of the stick as you keep proving. What I mean and what you mean are two different things and I think you should accept that and stop trying to prove a point that is frankly insignificant. Nobody cares.
"stop trying to prove a point that is frankly insignificant. Nobody cares."
There you have it friends, whether the ark had two or four cherubim on it is insignificant because no one cares.
No matter that at first she said that the bible said the same thing.
Digitalglass158 (1 month ago)
"the Ark of the covenant description in both the Bible and Eliphas Levi's transcendental magic - is of four winged bulls on either side of the oracle right?"
You're impossible. My point is valid and fair and yours is insignificant. I don't have trouble getting the texts right.. YOU DO. The point is you have trouble getting everything anyone says in the right context. I say and mean something and you interpret something entirely different and think I said it. You don't get that do you? Your point to me is insignificant.
There you have it friends, whether the ark had two or four cherubim on it is insignificant because no one cares.
Manipulative words from a self centred bastard here. I didn't say that - I said his point is insignificant - not this. If this is his point then he has trouble expressing it.
AND the point I am referring to is where I stated that the planets would align - this info I got from other websites and forums etc, I didn't actually come up with that scenario. I am the victim of misinformation - I didn't make it up and it wasn't my idea as I have stated from the beginning. Your website DC, contains a lot of misinformation that, because of how you presented it, some people will take as being true. Those ARE your ideas and you DID make them up.
He also wants people to view his apparent information... its not information he made it up. Yes look at it, see for yourself this mans misconceptions.
DC - you big bully, you've messaged all my friends with spam haven't you? All I want you to do is take down your videos - I'm not asking much. You are attacking me so I want you to know thats what you are doing - not defending yourself.
Also, when I said alignment, I meant with the centre of the galaxy, not a straight line as such unless you're standing on the sun and then it would look like it if they were in the same orbital plane - again things I got from another website. Do you know why I defended it? Because you made out I said it because you interpreted my video wrongly and I felt compelled to find evidence to support what I apparently said
You are a master manipulator thats all. You take things out of context and interpret them your way and make people look as if they said things they didn't mean to say. I will help people you do this to, I will show them how manipulative and selfish you are and that your website itself is full of untruths and illogical assumptions. Leave other people alone and get on with your own life - I will make sure no one takes you seriously.
ctd) Before you make a big mistake and then either myself or someone else will make that very clear. Now you have got the wrong end of the stick many times, your website proves that. I assume you think your ideas are right otherwise you wouldn't make a website up about them. You must believe in your own ideas and you must regard them as truth. However your ideas and your truth are false and look ridiculous and are difficult to fathom never mind prove.
No I didn't - because I was stating a case not citing it as truth and I am surprised you didn't realise that BB - I am disappointed in your lack of understanding - no I'm not - you are in fact a total moron and a jerk.
You defended it for days, saying that it Was Going to happen whether or not you could find it in an ephemeris. Shirl all kinds of people watched you do that.
By the way, I googled 'anderson prophet mantle' and came up with a book by an Anderson boy. Would that be a brother? How lame of you to name yer whole gig Mantle of the Prophet too. Ick.
And now we are on to the Book of Shadows are we. Y'all like that shadow stuff eh?
You're just jealous because I came up with something better than your fucked up idea about the pyramid in washington DC and you thought if anything was better than your idea you wouldn't get a publishing deal.. you're a big baby aren't you really?
By the way, I googled 'anderson prophet mantle' and came up with a book by an Anderson boy. Would that be a brother? How lame of you to name yer whole gig Mantle of the Prophet too. Ick
I don't have a brother. I do however have a book and a publishing deal you don't know about. I also don't believe in writing books under my own name and use a pseudonym. I never give my real name in anything - not even here.
And now we are on to the Book of Shadows are we. Y'all like that shadow stuff eh?
Got a problem with that? Lets hear it - oh and why don't you speak to me properly instead of being out to humiliate me in public - which you can't do, you only make yourself look like a prat and I am not the only person who thinks that am I? You know what I'm talking about.
ive spent 4 and a half minutes watching this, way too much time, at least i didnt spend x amount of time making video, i worry that all u will do is assist sending nutjobs to this cube site and as they want this sort of stuff 2 have meaning they will go along with it.i can understand ur frustration but some people if u fly them into space to see the planet will still pronounce world is flat. ahhhhhh now spent 8 and half minutes on subject, is it an addiction?
bryngOneOn 2 years ago
Well considering this video demonstrates definitively the flaw in observational selection, I'd say it's an educational video on how NOT to waste your time with stuff like this. And a 4.5 minute video and 4 minute response hardly qualifies as an addiction - it's education and discussion.
CosmosFan1 2 years ago
keep up the good work i like your analysis
eylijah 2 years ago
I have posted two new videos, they are "Analizing the Anderson Cube" and "Analizing the Anderson Cube Some More".
Big Bytes
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Why don't you look at a proper astronomical Ephemeris instead of relying on astrolog? BTW - I like your analysis - looks very much like a promotion. Even if you don't like it you are advertising it for me, the only vids I want you to remove are the one about the planetary alignment and where you mention my old channel etc by name. I'd so appreciate it.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
proper astronomical Ephemeris
I use Neil F. Michelsen's "American Ephemeris for the 21st Century", does that work for you. I have others. What do you use?
Big Bytes
dcsymbols 2 years ago
LOL - that took a while didn't it? So why didn't you agressively promote that like a religion - like you did with astrolog? Is that because you didn't understand till I pointed it out?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Do a search for 'Annual almanac of celestial events' and it will take you to a web page that shows an expanded farmer's almanac type view of the planetary circumstances. You can scroll year to year.
NASA Reference Publication 1349 contains an ephemeris from 1995 t0 2010 that's pretty good.
'online ephemeris' returns 150,000 links, so I bet you can find what YOU are looking for there. And what are you looking for again?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Nothing BB - I am just making a point that all your info comes from the internet or Astrolog . You are hilarious! As soon as I point out Astrolog is Astrology you go on a search for a proper astronomical ephemeris... its priceless really!! HAHAHA. But me.. no.. I'm not looking for anything , I just went with an opinion thats all, just a small mistake. You've made some as well but don't like to admit it do you? DO YOU? Well its not about what I said or didn't say anymore ... its about you..
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"where you mention my old channel"
How about your Wonderful World of Shirley Anderson site that has a link to the WONDERFUL WORLD OF MARK ALEXANDER ANDERSON (My wonderful Brother) on it. How dull.
The brother that you claim that you don't have, Is that one that I shouldn't point to either? The one where it STILL talks about planets aligning on?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Now its about you being a total prat and not listening - not being a decent person. Each post you put up, each horrible message you send to my friends, each nasty thing you do is only making you look worse and worse.. and thats what I'm looking for and everyone else. Keep digging your hole.. you'll fall into it one day.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
You can also go to the NASA Eclipse Web Site and look for a section called Solar System Data
Goto Sky Events Calendar where you can enter the date or period of time, then have it look for
Lunar Phases
Eclipses
Equinoxes/Solstices Moon Apogee/Perigee
Moon-Planet Conjunctions
Planet Events Meteor Showers
Try it
Big Bytes
dcsymbols 2 years ago
I like your analysis
you have missed the spelling Mo
dcsymbols 2 years ago
remember BB you attacked me agressively and then portrayed to other people that you were the victim and you still do. Is that why you don't have a partner? Do you always make out that you're a victim when you were the one who attacked? Were you always the school bully?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
One more thing - nobody likes a coward who constantly portrays himself as a weak little victim - spineless and dishonourable.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
When you come across as an arrogant condescending prat like you do, people will not listen to you - thats why I don't. I think you're a horrible old man with a grudge. When people visit your site or channel, even if they agree with you - you argue, if they are nice to you, you argue. You only respond favourably to other people who are as condescending as you are.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Search for "wonderful world of shirley anderson", you see her page and my 2012: Massive Planetary Alignment vid. At "The Wonderful World of Shirley Anderson" you will see
"In the year 2012 there will be a galactic alignment of planets heralding the age of Aquarius."
"The plan is that on the Winter Solstice of 2012 - December 21st at 11:11am when the planets align, at various gatherings all over the world people"...
When the planets align, eh?
Big Bytes
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Note especially that on the Wonderful World page is clearly reads, "Take a look round my internet pages and tell me what you think."
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
BTW - I am doing alright for hits. But you know BB there are people on youtube who have been here less of the time you have and they have thousands of subscribersdon't they? Maybe you should try to be a bit more like them instead of ..well.. what you are. I do pity you and one day I hope you'll see the error of your ways, that may be a long time off though I suspect.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Furthermore, I do have another internet site, and youtube channel which does have over a thousand subscribers, and my website is really starting to pay off and I'm earning enough money now to fund other projects and you should be seeing my books on the shelves in bookstores quite soon. But if you think I'm daft enough to tell you who I really am - think again. You'll just have to find out won't you?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
I can tell you're grasping at straws now. Messaging my friends was neither big nor clever and it shows you are so scared and frightened of losing an argument you'll do anything won't you? It backfired pal! That just makes you look bad . I thought you would have understood a thing like that - oh wait no.. not YOU that would be asking too much.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Jealousy will get you nowhere - I hope you are aware how angry and idiotic you look right now. How petty and stupid...again quoting things I've already answered for. What do you want then? Everyone can now see you're an asshole. I'll look forward to your book - if you're getting that many hits then a book should be easy for you shouldn't it? I wonder why no publisher will take you on? Could be your attitude I suppose.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
I am sending clips from this thread to the person who authored astrolog. I am also sharing in forums and discussion groups.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Why don't you give me the names of these discussion groups so I can give my side of the argument - oh wait you just want to gossip and stuff don't you?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"Why don't you give me the names"
Why don't you get some hits to you vids without having to resort to using multiple channels to do it.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Could it be the reason you aren't giving me the names of so called forums because you keep getting yourself banned for having a bad attitude and a mental health problem? Tried Anger management? I hear they have some interesting techniques these days.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Its ok I know you're only angry because you feel humiliated, that you didn't realise you were only using software good for astrology and that you didn't expect me to know that. Don't take too much offense - we all make mistakes, you make tons of them, like not being able to see geometric shapes like tetrahedrons - thats ok you're not an artist, you're a jealous misguided fool with a few grudges, thats all. I don't fault you for it, the unenlightened such as yourself often make such mistakes.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"you just want to gossip and stuff don't you?"
That's right, I'm gossiping (and stuff) with Physics Phd's and the person who developed the Astrolog software, not discussing someone who admits that they are no good at math or physics or astronomy, yet routinely makes broad proclamations about planetary positions, not knowing of what she speaks. I bet you couldn't keep up there.
Again, if you mean tight grouping, say that instead of straight line. People will understand you.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
So Digitalglass, were you applying for the position of junior debator or were you interested in the master debator position, cause the way you talk makes me HOT. What are you wearing right now? Mmm.
April 1
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
LOL priceless. Now you are showing your true colours again - wait till I show people this little quote eh? hahaha...
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
So Digitalglass, were you applying for the position of junior debator or were you interested in the master debator position, cause the way you talk makes me HOT. What are you wearing right now? Mmm.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Yeah, you saw where it read April 1 right.
Google wonderful world of shirley anderson and look at the head on that thing.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
I average hits a day on the front page of my DC Symbols site, and I am linked to Digitalglass158 there and elsewhere, and she still can't get hits on her youtube channel. She does however friend and subscribe to herlself as Shilx1. (If the truth be told, I believe that should read 3x.)
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
You get hits because I go there to find things you've said so I can annoy you about them hahahaha
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"You get hits because I go there to find things you've said so I can annoy you about them."
I have posted my site statistics on my front page so that you can check them. My front page got 150 hits in 24 hours yesterday. My total site hits yesterday was 592 hits.
I bet YOU didn't account for many of those Shirl. Or the400 plus hits I got every other day this week, over 500 again on the 27th. How you doin hit wise?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Please
Don't say straight lines if that's not what you mean.
dcsymbols 2 years ago
The alignment of planets in a straight line happened in May 7th 2000.
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Google 1983 planets configuration
"Actually the event that occurred in 1983 was that the planets (all eight of them -- we are on the ninth, Earth) would be within 96° of each other in the sky -- not in a straight line as most people would misinterpret with the term alignment. To have all of the planets on the same side of the Sun and virtually all within the same quadrant (i.e., 90°) happens approximately once every 200 years --
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Well done - you can also copy and paste - why didn't you credit the site you got that info from? Surely you didn't think of that yourself - especially when its near word-perfect as to what was written on the site.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Well done - you can also copy and paste
I said Google, so it is clearly from the front page where I googled. The prob is that links don't work here, but YOU could Google as I suggested, and as I did.
You just sit back and continue to show yer donkey, as we say here, Shirl.
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Oh you said GOOGLE wow. Didn't tell us you'd simply copied and pasted your info which is what you've done all along. Look more copy and paste, lol. If you ever work out anything for yourself then you have the authority to criticise others... now, you've clearly shown you havent. You got all your info from Astrolog - Astrology software, not Astronomy. You copied and pasted your info from other sites.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"You got all your info from Astrolog - Astrology software, not Astronomy."
Huh?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Thats right.. Astrology. It automatically configures a persons star sign and birth chart... thats why its called Astrolog. What did you think it was?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
":It automatically configures a persons star sign and birth chart... thats why its called Astrolog"
Don't stop now Shirl, you are on a definite roll. So it's no good for just seeing where the planets are at a given moment. Maybe you could point us to some that works better, and we can check again with that?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Gettin upset now cus you dun know the difference between astrology and astronomy... poor baby...
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"why didn't you credit the site you got that info from?"
Excuse me? I am presenting the straight facts for people to read and you want to fault me for leaving off quote marks? I Never said I wrote that.
Compare what I have presented to what you did-
"And they did already align, May 2000 and before that in 1983 straight lines.... "
Priceless. You know that when people look closely at this that you will look bad - MORE.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Right so you think when I said straight lines I meant absolutely straight - ah says a lot that does. Even I know they never align absolutely straight - after all the stars appear as moving in an elipse. What do you expect to accomplish here anyway?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"they never align absolutely straight - after all the stars appear as moving in an elipse. What do you expect to accomplish here anyway?"
After all stars appear as moving in an elipse? Wha??? Like I said, you are clearly not conversant with astronomical terminology.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Neither are you. You were reading astrology not astronomy - pathetic really. You know zero, you just copy and paste.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
I believe you are getting confused with these alignments. As there is a 1 in a billion or so chance that the planets will ever align in a straight line then its practically impossible. The alignments (any) are never exact. If you are now suggesting I said THAT - sorry babe - picture was not mine. That pic you have from my vid was again taken from another source.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
picture was not mine. That pic you have from my vid was again taken from another source.
she speaks here of an image that I took from her video that she used to illustrate the idea that the planets were all going to be in a line in DEC 2012. I axed her over and over abt that.
And again, speaking of 2000 and 1983 she says specifically, and repeats, 'straight lines', does she not? Don't say straight lines if that's not what you mean.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
You didn't ask me you harrassed me for months about it - and I defended myself - big mistake there huh? Next thing I know you are using my words in the wrong context - you're sick you know that? As for straight lines - they were as straight as they'll ever get - ok? Make it clear for you huh? Spell it out in baby language shall I? You were saying those conjunctions never happened weren't you? Cos you got your info from Astrolog..lol.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"and I defended myself"
Defended yourself? You defended the notion that the planets were aligning in 2012.
"As for straight lines - they were as straight as they'll ever get - ok"
That's wack. 25 degrees? Nutz.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
No, you wouldn't leave me alone and you harrassed me into it. I defended that I'd found the info elsewhere and put it in my video, thats what I've always said.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
CF1-
This is too rich, hope you aren't on a diet.
In the fall Shirl was proclaiming all the planets would align in a line in Dec 2012. Now she says they already aligned in May of 2000.
"Big Bytes thinks I laid claim to any ideas about 2012, wrong, I simply related info from other sources. The alignment of planets in a straight line happened in May 7th 2000. This is ERA 2012."
Look it up or download 'Astrolog' which is freeware. Why doesn't she check before speaking?
Big Bytes
dcsymbols 2 years ago
LOL.. I didn't claim anything of the sort - you got mixed up BB. I never ever laid claim to that idea - I said to you and others as well that I had found this from other sources and it was what others had been saying. Proclaiming ... pppffffttt... I never did. I was trying to organise an event not proclaim something. And they did already align, May 2000 and before that in 1983 straight lines....
Shirlx1 2 years ago
"And they did already align, May 2000 and before that in 1983 straight lines.... "
Yikes
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
If you think it was ME who said any of this stuff at all you might want to tell John Major Jenkins that he's been plagerising my work, how about that eh? Other people on the internet plagerised him and added their own perceptions. All I wanted to do was organise an event - a meditation. I was under the impression it was a fact- I'll grant you that but I NEVER made it up or am the author of the ideas.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
As for looking up things in Astrolog - I might if you didn't force it on me like some religion. You should take your irrelevant videos down and behave better than you have been. Its a complete lie to say that I laid claim to these ideas. I said from the beginning.. the VERY beginning they were from other sources.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
"As for looking up things in Astrolog - I might if you didn't force it on me like some religion"
Shirl, you mean you won't even look the next time to keep from saying the wrong things over and over? I don't care if YOU don't look. I like it even better, because then you don't know when you are right or wrong, because you clearly are not conversant in astronomical terms.
OK, line ups in 2000 and 1983. Any more claims? Friends, please look these up, but don't tell her what you find out.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Are you getting all your info from Astrolog? Yes please look these up because I did - not to appease this idiot but to see for myself rather than what other people are saying. I ask again BB did you get all your info from Astrolog?
Shirlx1 2 years ago
did you get all your info from Astrolog?
All what information? Astronomical? No, there are lots of places to view the planets positions. Try googling.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Yes please look these up because I did
And?? Line up in 2000? 1983??
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
DC I did this - um... sorry to burst your bubble but that astrolog is very very inaccurate... I'm sorry I thought you were actually smart but slightly off cue... I apologise, I was wrong about you, you are actually getting all your info from this. I find it rather tragic and wish you all the best. Don't answer, I'd rather find someone who knew what they were talking about.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
"astrolog is very very inaccurate"
"The main planetary calculation routines used in this program havebeen Copyrighted and the core of this program is basically aconversion to C of the routines created by James Neely as listed inMichael Erlewine's 'Manual of Computer Programming for Astrologers',
available from Matrix Software. The copyright gives us permission touse the routines for personal use but not to sell them or profit from
them in any way.
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Look love, I concede that I was under the impression there was gonna be an alignment of planets in 2012 - I was just relaying other sources. the 2000 and 1983 alignments are well documented - so I can only conclude that free software you got off the internet is a lousy way to read the stars isn't it? I still want to organise a big meditation event, I want it to coincide with movements in the heavens to give it some significance.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
"so I can only conclude that free software you got off the internet is a lousy way to read the stars isn't it? "
Google may 7, 2000 planets . And look.
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Google may 5, 2000 planets
The planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Jupiter, and Saturn all congregate near the Sun during late April and early May 2000. The Moon will join them for a couple of days. The tightest grouping of these six bodies will occur on May 5, when the Moon and planets spread across 25 degrees of sky -- a little more than the width of an outspread palm held at arm's length. The tightest grouping of the planets alone occurs on May 17, when they will span about 20 degrees.
dcsymbols 2 years ago
I admit I do want to organise a record breaking meditation event - its a bit ambitious I know, but I'd like to try, without any interference from you. I'd like it if you want to join in though, would be nice.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
"As for looking up things in Astrolog - I might"
The implication here is that she does not check what6 she proclaims with a chart or a book. As she says now, what she speaks is what she "had found from other sources". So in general, she "was trying to organize an event not proclaim something".
But she needed a 'hook', something to pull people in, so she picked planets aligning. Which she never checked in months, like she doesn't want to look at May 2000 right now, or 83.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
DC - one question, do you have a working copy of astrolog and are you getting all your info from that?
Shirlx1 2 years ago
do you have a working copy of astrolog
squeeze me? How could I have animated images of the planets that I captured from Astrolog on my Facing the Future (that's Facing the Future) page, if I dint have a working copy?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
CF1-
IM reposting my Anderson Cube vids to compliment the discussion here; there are several. Thanks again for this vid.
Big Bytes
dcsymbols 2 years ago
He means the ones where he made a mistake about Tons Brunes work being "copied" which it wasn't, because we'd never even heard of him before Big Bytes started shouting about it. The Anderson cube is a universal shape which is what I was saying in the first place.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Also, this coming from a man who can't see a tetrahedron when its right in front of his face, who accused me of "time travel" and scaremongering and follows me around messaging people about me, and putting them off - so there you go.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Christ BB - aren't you tired of being "wrong" yet? Don't tell me you make mistakes too? Dear God...
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
aren't you tired of being "wrong" yet?
today from Shirl-
"The alignment of planets in a straight line happened in May 7th 2000."
Right. Did you look at a chart to deduce that?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Thing about this video is - you CAN place any image on it and Jenei just proved it. Kind of goes against the statement "You can't just superimpose any image on it and think it has some cosmic significance" Disproved own statement.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
You're missing the point. Who would ever claim that there was any cosmic significance to transformers? It's ridiculous. Find me a substrate that ONLY depicts biblical images or ONLY occult images and I'm sold. THAT would be a unique, cosmically special shape. There isn't one.
CosmosFan1 2 years ago
Why would it only be cosmically special if only one type of image (occult) could be traced on it. Because all images can be traced on this matrix, that makes it more special. Google MERKABAH and you'll understand what I'm talking about.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"Find me a substrate that ONLY depicts biblical images or ONLY occult images and I'm sold."
Well said.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Still doesn't answer the question - why are only occult images significant? I think the people missing the point are you two, lol, its hilarious really.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Loaded question. Occult images AREN'T significant. If they were, they would be the only images to show up. Instead, we've got transformers and power rangers. To claim that an "anderson cube" is special simply because occult and biblical symbols show up in it would also require you to admit that transformers and power rangers and cosmically significant. Is that what you want?
CosmosFan1 2 years ago
Don't you think anything that is designed by the human mind (including power rangers and transformers) is cosmically significant? Do you even realise what goes into designing anything? Yes of course they are - all around you is art, all of it came from the mind of human beings,and you sit there in your ignorance..
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Thought process fail.
Deeanngello 2 years ago
BTW I've never heard such rot - if they were significat they would be the only images to show up.,. haha.. what planet are you from? I'm a trained designer and design is all about geometry. I never claimed occult images were the only images on there - just that they can be traced on there.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Please get your arguments together. It really shows that you post impulsively, with little thought about what you're saying. The fact of the matter is, transformers AREN'T cosmically significant. And, as you've just admitted, occult images aren't the only images to show up - they are therefore not unique to this shape. Tell me. Wouldn't it really be something if occult images WERE the only ones to show up? What would that mean?
CosmosFan1 2 years ago
What? Is your ego so big you can't see past it or what? I NEVER said they were the only images that could be traced on there. Transformers are cosmically significant as is everything designed by the human mind. The lack of thought is coming from your side (and that fool who doesn't even know what a tetrahedron is ) the reason its called sacred geometry is because of its many properties.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Firstly, do you admit that neither the occult nor religion have any more significance than transformers as far as "sacred geometry" is involved?
Also, do you acknowledge the possibility that the only reason all images fit into things like the anderson cube is because of its diverse shape? Consider the screen you're looking at. It's a grid made of several pixels. It's capable of displaying anything. Does that make a grid sacred geometry?
CosmosFan1 2 years ago
Nope - occult and religious symbols have a psychological affect that cartoons and childrens programmes do not have. yes it is a diverse shape, how is that going against what I originally said?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Because the only reason occult and religious symbols show up is the same reason why cartoons show up. Like a grid, that shape is so diverse, ANY image will appear - significant or not.
CosmosFan1 2 years ago
Yes thats what I was saying in the first place.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
You are full of it Big Bytes - you need to examine where it is you went wrong in life. I can tell you one or two places.
D6BadUIkfKs - see video.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Also BB - you know about Geometry (supposedly) don't you? You're a bit of a hypocrite really because Sacred Geometry doesn't just apply to the occult or in your case the DC map or the masons. Geometry is used to design everything.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Digitalglass158
Joined: October 23, 2008
Last Sign In: 27 minutes ago
Videos Watched: 1,426
Subscribers: 3
Channel Views: 420
dcsymbols 2 years ago
LOL - doing it again aren't you - the harrassement stalking behaviour.. yeah? Do you know whats really REALLY dumb dc? That you - so great at Geometry (so you think) couldn't even recognise a star tetrahedron when you saw it... lol.. your thesis on Washington DC is wrong, now will you admit that or not?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"your thesis on Washington DC is wrong"
To see just how wrong for yourself, you can do a search for Masonic and Kabbalistic Symbols in the Washington DC Map.
Big Bytes
dcsymbols 2 years ago
I did - the site is full of paranoia and statements about how he is not wrong and super- mega explanations about simple sentences. The man is very much afraid of being wrong - so yes if you look at it you'll see what I mean. Perhaps while youre at it you'd like to look at this video V_gzz2xHvA. He's been so wrong about so many things.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
From Shrlx1's channel March 26th:
"on one of my websites I have it posted that there will be the galactic alignment of planets - ie, the sun, venus and the centre of the galaxy"
Those of you who know anything abt astronomy know that she is confusing the December Solstice and the June 2012 Venus Transit here.
dcsymbols 2 years ago
No I'm not DC. I didn't say they'd be aligning together like that - you're confusing the issue yourself as usual. These alignments all happen in 2012 and within close proximity - six months.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"on one of my websites I have it posted that there will be the galactic alignment of planets - ie, the sun, venus and the centre of the galaxy"
"These alignments all happen in 2012 and within close proximity - six months."
Is it the alignment, or these alignments , plural?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Is it the alignment, or these alignments , plural?
There you have it positive proof YOU DON'T KNOW. Do you? Are they all part of one big cosmic event or are they separate - remember YOU asked because you YOU don't know do you?
Shirlx1 2 years ago
"YOU DON'T KNOW. Do you? "
Correct. I am having trouble divining Your meaning. Did you mean the June or the December event; because everything you write says Dec 21?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
So you admit you have trouble diving.. as you call it.. meanings of things. That explains a lot - you do misunderstand frequently don't you? Don't worry you'll get over it. PS - Thanks for all your hard work on Washington DC - pity you didn't even understand it.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
PS - I know you're jealous because I know stuff you have no idea about - lol.. its kinda funny you poring over a silly map and theorising about a power grid when I really know whats going on - haha.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
BTW, just because I have things on my own website, doesn't mean I've put these things forward in any sort of argument with you. You picked out statements, you manipulated things, and you pretended that I said them to argue with you - no I didn't. They are on my site and people can think what they like. So why did you take what I said, put it on here as if it was me arguing against you? How dumb can you get? Oh... ?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Please take your videos down. It pains me to stoop to your level like this - I'm used to better things. Just do the decent thing - stop arguing your point and get on with your life how hard can that be.. it must be very very hard for you.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"Today BB messaged my friend and won't stop annoying him."
That person unsubscribed from you and sent me a friend request directly after that Shirl:
Wed 3/25/09 1:03 PM
ArtistLoS has invited you to become friends on YouTube.
I have not written him back.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
OMG you total liar. Besides DC all I want you to do is remove a couple of videos - why won't you do that? Its just a simple request - and then you'll never hear from me again - simple. If you keep them up it just proves you are out to antagonise me on purpose.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
"all I want you to do is remove a couple of videos - why won't you do that? "
Why aren't you begging CosmosFan1 to remove this?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Comment removed
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Correction - I asked Jenei for his opinion and wanted him to make this video. I didn't ask for your opinion DC - and there was no need to make several videos explaining how you got the wrong idea when everyone else didn't. Why make a video about your own ignorance?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"I asked Jenei for his opinion"
And here it is:
"And what claim am I making? The burden of proof lies on the one who makes the initial claim. Just because I show disbelief, it is not up to me to show that the claim is false; it is up to those who make the original claim(s) to provide the evidence. And so far, there hasn't been much of the latter going on here..."
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
So what? I asked for his opinion and he gave it in a nice way - he didn't make four or five videos showing his own ignorance and making whopping mistakes like you did - at least his argument was an intelligent one. From you I just get crap - and you have an agenda - he doesn't.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
BTW - the video shows that any symbol can be placed on the matrix - its just that Jenei came to a different conclusion, not that it can't be done. So, again you've misread the whole thing and you are proving that you keep getting the wrong idea - is there something causing this strange perception?
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"the video shows that any symbol can be placed on the matrix "
Yes, and Which video is That? The one that has been moved so we can't check it?
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
FURTHERMORE... Jenei's video shows that anything can be placed on the matrix - thats THIS VIDEO. The anderson cube as I called it - is always evolving and changing the more I begin to understand it.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
'the video shows that any symbol can be placed on the matrix '
"can you show me an image that does not fit this matrix?"
Yes. Curvilinear images like the Taoist yin/yang image.
Allright - given that the cube does not show actual curves...
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
Thats enough DC - you are antagonising and starting arguments - there's no point in explaining this to you seeing as you just want to argue rather than do the right thing - remove your videos and stop arguing over nothing. As a matter of fact however once you add the spiral - curvelinear images do appear. Merkabah rotates. That motion is a spiral motion - why don't you read up on it instead of making moronic statements like this.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
DC - here is a video showing rotation of Merkabah. BJz9ISh_s4
Google Merkabah and find out all about it, don't come to me with your moronic outlook and expect me to understand - I'm a better person than that.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
LOL - he expects now to have proven that I was arguing my point when I made that statement. No I wasn't - just because I say something or state something on my website doesn't mean I am putting it forward during some argument. His accusations, his understandings are all false and unfounded.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
The only person who is arguing anything is Big Bytes himself - with himself. I want his videos removed, thats all. He can think what he likes.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
Big Bytes seems to have a problem discerning what is an argument and what is not. This is what he wrote on the video entitled "Massive planetary alignment"
Shirlx1 2 years ago
"As for arguing the planets were going to align - I didn't"
From "The Wonderful World of Shirley Anderson" - In the year 2012 there will be a galactic alignment of planets heralding the age of Aquarius. The plan is that on the Winter Solstice of 2012 - December 21st at 11:11am when the planets align, at various gatherings all over the world people will go into a communal meditation and vibrate the cosmic "Ommmmm" all at once.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
One thing I will say now - the Anderson cube as I named it back then is Merkabah and it revealed itself to me in different forms. Reality is projected onto the Merkabah matrix which surrounds the body and so yes of course everything that exists can be traced within the Anderson cube - my design, my perception of a greater truth.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
"everything that exists can be traced within the Anderson cube - my design, my perception of a greater truth. "
How embarrassing to repeat the thesis that the young man attacked initially with this video. That is exactly what he says is NOT the case. Check it out. Look at the movie once.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
This is my perception of a far greater truth which is commonly known as Merkabah. How embarrasing for DC that he doesn't understand plain Engish - and yes, everything that exists can be traced upon its matrix. Watch the video - yes it can. DC made yet another embarrasing mistake and misunderstanding. I will add this to my collection.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
Comment removed
dcsymbols 3 years ago
I've reported you to youtube for this kind of behavior. I hope they do something because this is now amounting to harrassment.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
There you have it friends, whether the ark had two or four cherubim on it is insignificant because no one cares.
There you have it people. My words taken out of context and interpreted wrongly by a diseased mind - proof positive. I can show you a dozen instances of this manipulative behaviour. He interprets facts his way and thinks everyone else is wrong. That is a primative way of thinking.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
Comment removed
dcsymbols 3 years ago
Whats this supposed to prove? That you can read maybe? That you can copy information using cut and paste or what? Grow up for heavens sake.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
To see Shirl's homepage google "anderson forever holme". There you will see in big letters THE BIG OMM. (nov 27)
"In the year 2012 there will be a galactic alignment of planets." That's planets (pl) that are going to align.
"on the Winter Solstice of 2012 - December 21st at 11:11am when the planets align"
Once again, when the planets align. Note that she presumes that the event will occur at 11:11 every where.
No planets are aligning then.
dcsymbols 3 years ago
Whats your problem.. let it go..take a chill pill.. is your heart rate up? Good.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
"is your heart rate up? Good."
Huh?
This is the Shirley Anderson that is proposing to lead a big meditation that will help heal the earth?
Priceless stuff Shirl.
dcsymbols 3 years ago
wings inclined archwise, thus overshadowing the crown of the golden table,
These were winged bulls. Four winged bulls. There were according to this text four winged bulls on the corners of the ark - their heads turned this and that way - and that is EXACTLY what is shown on the Anderson cube EXACTLY. Now you can try and disprove that all you like but I know its true.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
Shirl is not my real name either.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
BB- "By the way, I googled 'anderson prophet mantle' and came up with a book by an Anderson boy. Would that be a brother?"
Shirl - "I don't have a brother."
You Lie!!
Google "anderson forever holme" and see the following (Nov 27) -
Now browse the WONDERFUL WORLD OF MARK ALEXANDER ANDERSON (My wonderful Brother)
"I never give my real name in anything - not even here."
You Lie!!
dcsymbols 3 years ago
He's not my brother. I confuse ye.. not lie.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
No shit.. I never give my real name and sometimes I pretend I'm the opposite sex - in short you don't know whether I'm male, female, if my pics are genuine or if I'm just pretending or what. You're on the internet.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
"I never give my real name and sometimes I pretend I'm the opposite sex - in short you don't know whether I'm male, female"
I know. You also have channels where you pretend to be from different countries.
Can we presume that you hired that 'mellon headed' woman that we saw in the videos on the Shirl channel?
dcsymbols 3 years ago
Haha - you are so easy to wind up its unreal. You are very very capable of getting the wrong end of the stick as you keep proving. What I mean and what you mean are two different things and I think you should accept that and stop trying to prove a point that is frankly insignificant. Nobody cares.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
"stop trying to prove a point that is frankly insignificant. Nobody cares."
There you have it friends, whether the ark had two or four cherubim on it is insignificant because no one cares.
No matter that at first she said that the bible said the same thing.
Digitalglass158 (1 month ago)
"the Ark of the covenant description in both the Bible and Eliphas Levi's transcendental magic - is of four winged bulls on either side of the oracle right?"
My point is you have trouble getting it right.
dcsymbols 3 years ago
You're impossible. My point is valid and fair and yours is insignificant. I don't have trouble getting the texts right.. YOU DO. The point is you have trouble getting everything anyone says in the right context. I say and mean something and you interpret something entirely different and think I said it. You don't get that do you? Your point to me is insignificant.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
There you have it friends, whether the ark had two or four cherubim on it is insignificant because no one cares.
Manipulative words from a self centred bastard here. I didn't say that - I said his point is insignificant - not this. If this is his point then he has trouble expressing it.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
AND the point I am referring to is where I stated that the planets would align - this info I got from other websites and forums etc, I didn't actually come up with that scenario. I am the victim of misinformation - I didn't make it up and it wasn't my idea as I have stated from the beginning. Your website DC, contains a lot of misinformation that, because of how you presented it, some people will take as being true. Those ARE your ideas and you DID make them up.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
"Your website DC"
The website to which she refers is named Masonic and Kabbalistic Symbols in the Washington DC Map, in case you want to take a look at that.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
He also wants people to view his apparent information... its not information he made it up. Yes look at it, see for yourself this mans misconceptions.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
DC - you big bully, you've messaged all my friends with spam haven't you? All I want you to do is take down your videos - I'm not asking much. You are attacking me so I want you to know thats what you are doing - not defending yourself.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"all my friends"
Please goto Shirlx1 and Digitalglass158 and count her friends. Note that in both cases she is one of her own friends and subscribers. Clever.
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
My friends unsubscribed because he messaged them privately with insults. They all hate him and he follows me around like a dog causing trouble.
Digitalglass158 2 years ago
"My friends unsubscribed"
name three
BB
dcsymbols 2 years ago
So you can go and antagonise them? You name the three you harrassed.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
BTW unlike you - I respect people's privacy and rights - you don't seem to understand the words "human rights" learn what they mean and practise it.
Shirlx1 2 years ago
Also, when I said alignment, I meant with the centre of the galaxy, not a straight line as such unless you're standing on the sun and then it would look like it if they were in the same orbital plane - again things I got from another website. Do you know why I defended it? Because you made out I said it because you interpreted my video wrongly and I felt compelled to find evidence to support what I apparently said
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
You are a master manipulator thats all. You take things out of context and interpret them your way and make people look as if they said things they didn't mean to say. I will help people you do this to, I will show them how manipulative and selfish you are and that your website itself is full of untruths and illogical assumptions. Leave other people alone and get on with your own life - I will make sure no one takes you seriously.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
ctd) Before you make a big mistake and then either myself or someone else will make that very clear. Now you have got the wrong end of the stick many times, your website proves that. I assume you think your ideas are right otherwise you wouldn't make a website up about them. You must believe in your own ideas and you must regard them as truth. However your ideas and your truth are false and look ridiculous and are difficult to fathom never mind prove.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
"They most certainly won't align. What makes her think so?"
Her latest version of that story is that she heard it in a forum and never bothered to check the fact by looking at ephemeris.
In one version of her tale, she says that you won't be able to see the alignment unless you are standing on the surface of the sun.
At one time she told me that it didn't matter what a book said there WAS going to be an alignment of all the planets.
As you may imagine ppl had a field ady with that too :-)
dcsymbols 3 years ago
No I didn't - because I was stating a case not citing it as truth and I am surprised you didn't realise that BB - I am disappointed in your lack of understanding - no I'm not - you are in fact a total moron and a jerk.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
"I was stating a case not citing it as truth"
You lie!!
You defended it for days, saying that it Was Going to happen whether or not you could find it in an ephemeris. Shirl all kinds of people watched you do that.
By the way, I googled 'anderson prophet mantle' and came up with a book by an Anderson boy. Would that be a brother? How lame of you to name yer whole gig Mantle of the Prophet too. Ick.
And now we are on to the Book of Shadows are we. Y'all like that shadow stuff eh?
dcsymbols 3 years ago
Haha.. owned - gotcha! You're still a fucktard and you keep proving it!
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
You're just jealous because I came up with something better than your fucked up idea about the pyramid in washington DC and you thought if anything was better than your idea you wouldn't get a publishing deal.. you're a big baby aren't you really?
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
"you thought if anything was better than your idea you wouldn't get a publishing deal.. "
That's pretty much it in a nutshell.
dcsymbols 3 years ago
By the way, I googled 'anderson prophet mantle' and came up with a book by an Anderson boy. Would that be a brother? How lame of you to name yer whole gig Mantle of the Prophet too. Ick
I don't have a brother. I do however have a book and a publishing deal you don't know about. I also don't believe in writing books under my own name and use a pseudonym. I never give my real name in anything - not even here.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
And now we are on to the Book of Shadows are we. Y'all like that shadow stuff eh?
Got a problem with that? Lets hear it - oh and why don't you speak to me properly instead of being out to humiliate me in public - which you can't do, you only make yourself look like a prat and I am not the only person who thinks that am I? You know what I'm talking about.
Digitalglass158 3 years ago
The book T.M. is available on line - just google Eliphas Levi Transcendental Magick. You can find it on the altreligion site.
But its over 400 pages.
CosmosFan1-
I believe that you would also get a 'kick' out of Shirl's homepage (google anderson mantle of the prophet) where she talks about the planets aligning.
"on the Winter Solstice of 2012 - December 21st at 11:11am when the planets align"
In her Big Omm video she claimed that all of the planets would align then.
dcsymbols 3 years ago