A similar but clearly different version is also posted on youtube. That's the one on Hurried Life. This appears to be later and a bit more similar to the Associations version.
This may have been a result of her not knowing that she could have started her own publishing company back then. Now-a-days if a publisher only wants to pay you a percentage of your half of the publishing, then they are trying to rip you off. Publishing should always be a 50-50 deal. I would imagine she mad gobs of money from her part of the radio royalties; which no publisher can touch. If there was ever anyone who could complain about a bad publishing deal, it would be George...
Just to add to the confusion: I disagree about this being the same version as is on her album.
However, it MIGHT be that version with extra stuff dubbed on. The guitar solo here is certainly NOT on the version I have. The vocals sound different, but that could be down to production at the dubbing stage.
wow, I know a completely different album version than this one. so good to hear this, I've always preferred her own version over the "the association" one..
this is the same version that came out on her album. if you live in the los angeles area you should keep an eye out for her. she occasionally plays around town and is worth seeing.
I was SO hoping this would be that supposed 3/4 version that you're referring to(I read about it also,in the billboard book of #1 hits).Frankly though,I don't see how you could put this song into 3/4 time without it sounding really awkward,perhaps the story was apocryphal.
It's neat to hear the songwriter sing her own song!!!!!!!!!!
TJCATLOVER 1 month ago
Very nice. Like the harmonies.
3replybiz 2 months ago
Ahh, so much talent.
floridacracker2 6 months ago
A similar but clearly different version is also posted on youtube. That's the one on Hurried Life. This appears to be later and a bit more similar to the Associations version.
lincolnsongsandmore 8 months ago
Was she singing in the chorus on the Association's version?
grooverunner 10 months ago
easily one of the greatest top 20 songs of the 1960's
rasputin63 1 year ago
This almost sounds like Carole King. I never knew, until recently, that there was a version before The Association's.
cmulwee001 1 year ago
Awesome demo! I wish the Association would have kept the song in the same key as this demo!
WARDMAN3 1 year ago
Hmm, Looks like the discs need some of My polish!
ade425mxy 1 year ago
Ruthann, thanks for writing this pretty song.
floridacracker2 1 year ago
She made lots of good money but not as much as she might have made if she hadn't been ripped off for half the publishing...
windya12003 1 year ago
@windya12003
This may have been a result of her not knowing that she could have started her own publishing company back then. Now-a-days if a publisher only wants to pay you a percentage of your half of the publishing, then they are trying to rip you off. Publishing should always be a 50-50 deal. I would imagine she mad gobs of money from her part of the radio royalties; which no publisher can touch. If there was ever anyone who could complain about a bad publishing deal, it would be George...
jsmyers24151 1 year ago
@windya12003
Harrison of The Beatles. His percentage for any of his songs was less than 1%. I wouldn't want that deal; even if it meant getting a song out there.
jsmyers24151 1 year ago
Do you think she made some nice dough from this? Or did she get ripped like so many others in the 60s?
peterzang 2 years ago
Just to add to the confusion: I disagree about this being the same version as is on her album.
However, it MIGHT be that version with extra stuff dubbed on. The guitar solo here is certainly NOT on the version I have. The vocals sound different, but that could be down to production at the dubbing stage.
iangordoncraig 2 years ago
Very folksy, more soothing compared to the Association's version, which was more light pop.
reminds me of James Taylor and Peter, Paul and Mary.
saif2020 2 years ago
wow, I know a completely different album version than this one. so good to hear this, I've always preferred her own version over the "the association" one..
thanks for sharing!
popsteric 2 years ago
Thank you for the information!
ma01302250sa 2 years ago
this is the same version that came out on her album. if you live in the los angeles area you should keep an eye out for her. she occasionally plays around town and is worth seeing.
epicmeade 2 years ago
Thank you for the information!
Regrettably I don't live in US.
ma01302250sa 2 years ago
This is great, but I had read somewhere that she wrote the song in 3/4 time?! This is not in that meter.
7NTM61Ic 2 years ago
I was SO hoping this would be that supposed 3/4 version that you're referring to(I read about it also,in the billboard book of #1 hits).Frankly though,I don't see how you could put this song into 3/4 time without it sounding really awkward,perhaps the story was apocryphal.
plectrum34 2 years ago