3DMark 11 All Six Tests at 1080p

[trallawan]

who else got a bit dissapointed?

[SpartanForgeWorld300]

I hope this is what the next Xbox looks like!

[ImRichaye]

@SpartanForgeWorld300 Hahahahaha next xbox? hahaha......Oh wait you where serious?....Hahahahahaha

[mystrdat]

@SpartanForgeWorld300 No, not even close, it will be worse. The hardware deals MS got are basically a mediocre PC today.

[Reloaded211]

I'll look this up in 5 years just to laugh at those cheap and primitive smartphone graphics effects.

[klwneu]

Ok Ok I guess I over did the comments. I guess this is what it feels like when i run 3dmark 11 when someone had gtx8800's in sli when running 3dmark vantage back in the day.

[klwneu]

And it was that ring. As it is now as it was 2011 years ago.

[klwneu]

you heard me the life stinks 3dmark11. Like I'm the one Mel Brooks was talkin about in spaceball "who's got the one real ring" And trying to turn and burn like I was Richard Dryfuss in American graffiti wearin that ring while I'm gettin slapped by Johnny. O! I knew A Bill Murry lookalike but he passed away and I did have that ring but this time I'm Johnny.

[klwneu]

Ever since 2000 I have had shit thrown at me from the real world for no reason except the fact I don't look that good in the face. But I make the money to afford high end computer equipment. And I don't have to face my country because I fought for my country. And don't DON'T try to drive me out of my house now that things are stable for me. Not on DX11 not on the alcohol or drugs that this society pushes.

[klwneu]

Let me take a guess that rep from msi (Linus) was one of them that had a say in the creation of this.the same guy that loaded up a 8600gs as a physx card with a gtx580. That attitude that real people don't use physx card. What do they do? Have no money to afford a physx card? Don't build computers? go away? Go back outside so people can hate you again? Mad people!

[klwneu]

Hey! it's 3dmark 11 the one that doesn't let you overclock your pc for it to work, that not real world considering I can play games overclocked. The poor mans mark so that rich man that's got good system and poor man both get same score. Life stinks mark where it's 11's are up for the man who dump's real money into there system.

[eugenealive]

This is how the games on PC could look today, if not these shitty consoles.

[BenFosterism]

to think this sort of graphics are fully possible on pc :(. DAMN YOU CONSOLES

[notlekrut]

@BenFosterism But no at really high resolutions. I've seen tests and the best cards run it at highest settings but not high resolutions. And i also agree, with what you said, consoles are slowing down graphics evolution.

[mystrdat]

@notlekrut 7970 Crossfired can beast through this.

[notlekrut]

@mystrdat Of course, but better wait for 7990 with is basically two 7970 you should have better performance. I think you do lose a bit performance with crossfire. It will be the next monster, 6Gb.

[BurialSerge]

are those mindless self indulgence subs?

[bencammo]

dem graphics

[Staudinka]

Shit, my monitor ain't even got a high enough resolution to show this video in full quality. Not that my GPU could handle it^^

[BenFosterism]

@Staudinka I can remember on my old PC youtube HD stuttered.

[celebrei]

3DMark 11 = Chuck Norris' screensaver

[salanos]

Has FutureMark ever thought of licensing this engine out for machinima or cinema? It seriously looks as good as most commercial renderers sometimes.

Sometimes I wish more games actually looked like this.

[lizerg700]

@salanos CryEngine 3.

[salanos]

@lizerg700 I would know, I play Crysis 2.

[Y0URm0mmasballs]

In the near future, 3D mark 11 will be a screensaver.

[scruffylittledog]

If someone does this on integrated well, I'll give them a blowjob. Seriously.

[uberfun19]

I run the video at 1080p and had 45FPS, now I wait for games instead of just demo

[REbornDArth]

@uberfun19 play crysis 2 with dx11 or wait for Battlefield 3

[uberfun19]

@REbornDArth understood Sir!

[DjXpeRimental]

p5385 with my palit geforce gtx 570 sonic platinul overclocket at:

-core clock 992 (stock 800)

-shader clock 1984 (stock 1600)

-memory clock 2259 (stock 2000)

-core voltage 1.150 (stock 1.000)

Intel core 2 quad q6600 - stock 2.4 Ghz / overclocked at 3.8 Ghz

Cooled with a H60 Hydro Series Corsair Water cooling system.

16Gb DDR 3 - 1600 Mhz - Corsair Vengeance

[psychonaut25]

I want my 2:32 back. Thats 2:32 wasted, and 2:32 that i can play more on my xbox 360.

[GrimrandomerVideos]

@psychonaut25 30 seconds wasted complaining

[kwpunit]

@psychonaut25 GTFO man.

[psychonaut25]

@kwpunit u mad?

[kwpunit]

@psychonaut25 that doesn't work like that.

[psychonaut25]

@kwpunit oh yes, i need DX11 to make it work

[jensi18]

I look forwards to the day when this is in-game gfx :3

[KenanKongMan]

SLI / Crossfire now feels necessary.

[jangalomph]

I have a radeon 5770 HD 1gb gddr5, and a triple core x3 phenom. 3d mark 11 raped my computer. My computer couldn't even finish the tests.

[d1nam01975]

blah my crappy ATI radeon 4250 has just died...and I'm only thinking about testing it

[h4xmode]

Are they ever planning on a game with this engine?

[MrDestructor2011]

@h4xmode Yea. They lauch shattered horizon. And they will launch 3 more games...

[Usul573]

@MrDestructor2011

Isn't that the 3DMark Vantage, DX10 engine?

[MrDestructor2011]

@Usul573 nope. and well yes use a enginee of DX10 but is a game

[Usul573]

@MrDestructor2011

Say what?



[Reloaded211]

@h4xmode They did. Look up that game no one plays these days, "Shattered Horizon".

[Mooseguy15]

i do run benchmark on mine but it aint giving me scores i let it go trought every single test 6 times in a freaking row and nothing how long do i have to wait?

[DarkAnimeWindSlayer]

Running this in all setting max out is the best graphics I ever seen. Better than Metro 2033 but yes I was getting 10 FPS >.< Oh the lag.

[BigArtek1]

w.youtube.com/watch?v=s41yPePA­GPo

[ccmm150]

I have nvidia GT425M but i have 1.8FPS because of nvidia optimus (probably), someone knows how to fix it?

[animekid200]

Aw, I wanted them to do something as awesome as '06

[Kloborgg]

@baca262

..Really? The source engine can let your bullets affect the the curvature of a waving sheet or flag? It can create real-time moving dust particles in sunlight? Source was great in its time, but picking up and throwing static objects and ragdolls hardly compares to modern usage of PhysX.

[animekid200]

PhysX is pretty much just a scam to try and get a few ATI users to buy Nvidia cards, and of course to make more expensive cards more desirable.

[Kloborgg]

@animekid200

It's not a "scam", it's a marketing tool. Yes, the only reason ATI cards don't have it is because Nvidia doesn't allow them too, that's business. However, Physx is certainly a real thing that does add a decent bit of eye-candy to a few games.

[animekid200]

You don't get my reasoning behind it.

Gamers barely need mid-range CPU's to run games that don't have PhysX, but still provide the visual features that PhysX can do.

All that PhysX does, is move some visual features that the CPU usually handles, namely Physics, and moves it to the GPU.

Which, in turn, means people who want PhysX features to run smoothly, can't spend more money on Intel, only on Nvidia.

If PhysX became industry standard as Havok did, Nvidia's plan would be a success.

[Kloborgg]

@animekid200

I'm sorry, but you have no idea what you're talking about. What you're claiming is not based off of any tech reasoning, it's just speculation. GPU-accelerated physics is a very real technology, and it'll render much faster than even the greatest CPU. You may not know this, but you CAN select to render PhysX with your processor, and you'll get much lower FPS as a result. Being able to simultaneously render the physics of an object AND draw it make the process much faster.

[jounihat]

So the future of gaming graphics is 5m of clear view distance and everything else full of blur and fog effects? Count me out.

[carrerasubway]

I ran the video fine at 1080, so I pass ??

[Blobface07]

@carrerasubway you need to download the software itself, this is just a preview. What the software does is generate very intensive graphics to test your pc. This is just a video showcasing them.

[shakalek]

Very nice slideshow :D

[nlicky]

Ok, 3DMark has some cool stuff as usual. Seeing that this uses a lot more outdoor environments for realism for 2011. Physics test is cool with tons of things being destroyed. Amazing benchmark scenes for realistic environments on Earth.

But, how would this compare to Crysis 2? Hmm? They are both even contenders.

[kapteinsnute]

@nlicky Crysis 2 only has DirectX 9, so it would be unfair to compare them. You can get decent framerates in Crysis 2 even with 4 year old graphics cards (I got about 60 fps with vsync on my GTX280). I cant really comment on how 3DMark 11 performance, since my card is only DX10, but I bet this video showcasing it with a SLI or even Quad setup.

[Kloborgg]

@kapteinsnute

60 FPS with Vsync on a 280? On what resolution? I'm using a 560 at 1080 and I average 45-50 FPS, with spikes up to 60.

[kapteinsnute]

@Kloborgg max 60 fps with vsync on, it sometimes fluctuate between 30 and 60 when alot is going on onscreen (but tbh, there isnt very much going on in Crysis 2 most of the time) With vsynch off, 40-70. I didnt play it all that much with my old system, I just finished building a new sandy bridge setup with a GTX 580, it almost seems overkill now, with constant 60 fps even in 3D mode (720P though since my projector cant output higher. I hate tearing in games, so vsync on most of the time.

[Kloborgg]

@kapteinsnute

720p explains it. By the way, killer setup! Have fun with that thing.

[kapteinsnute]

@Kloborgg Thanks, yeah in sterescopic 3D mode I have to run it in 720P for my projector.

But those results I mentioned in the first part of my comment I got from playing in 1080p on my monitor but they were not on the extreme setting, they were on high.

[bobishigh145]

lol @ the idiots who think the VIDEO is the test. Get off the fucking internet <3

[Treviath]

And thus much lag was ensured

[kamratframjandet]

My Macbook Pro plays this in 1080p without problem. What's the deal? It's just a video?

[15935715935788224466]

@kamratframjandet No its fucking HD

[pakrambo]

@kamratframjandet

lol dude this is a gaming benchmark for graphics cards. ofcouse your computer can play this video but your computer will not be able to play the actual software benchmarks which does a stress test on video card. for example your computer will be able to play videos of crysis with no problem but actually playing crysis will be another story.

[kamratframjandet]

@pakrambo That's what I'm saying, this is just a video, but people sit here and brag about how their computers are able to play the video in 1080p, thinking the video itself is a graphics test.

[dayglo98]

@kamratframjandet haha fail

[kamratframjandet]

@Herbaceous2008 Why? It is a video. I can play other videos in 1080p aswell without a problem. 3DMark is a benchmark tool used to test the DirectX9 performance of your graphics card. This video isn't rendered from a 3D vector model as you watch it.

[Kelnar7]

@kamratframjandet do you mean just watching the video on youtube or the video in the program? if you watch in the program it is actually utilising your pc and will run it based on how good your pc is....if you mean watching this video? um......are people retarded?

[Coaxs94]

@kamratframjandet ahahhahahaah never heard something stupid like that :D

[SithMarauder666]

@kamratframjandet LMFAO

[ASKALAPHUS]

@kamratframjandet It IS a graphics test, unlike "just a video". Any computer today can play a video. The challenge here is that your testing how your computer can render all those 3d spaces and effects in real time, unlike a pre-rendered video like those awesome trailers that Blizzard Makes

[kamratframjandet]

@ASKALAPHUS We've been through this already! THIS is a video OF a graphics test. YouTube isn't rendering the 3D models with texture and lighting, neither is your computer. This is simply a video. That's why the video description is saying "Visit 3dmark(dot)com to download now".

[ASKALAPHUS]

@kamratframjandet Ooooh you were talking about the guy who had high hopes because he could play the youtube video at 1080p

[kamratframjandet]

@ASKALAPHUS Yep =)

[tazss159]

@ASKALAPHUS So the graphics in the video are being rendered by the PC in real time?

[ASKALAPHUS]

@tazss159 Nope. Watching Ray William Johnson is no more of a test than the video above. If you really wan't to test your computer you must download the software and run it, NOT watch a RECORDING of someone else's test.

[tazss159]

@ASKALAPHUS Sorry, I meant if I downloaded this test and ran it on my computer, my computer would be rendering these graphics in real time?

[ASKALAPHUS]

@tazss159 Yes it will, same as with any computer game.

[tazss159]

@ASKALAPHUS So, modern day computers are capable of these type of graphics?

[scarletrhubarb]

@tazss159 is this a real question?

[tazss159]

@scarletrhubarb Yes.

[scarletrhubarb]

@tazss159 i can't post a url, so i guess i will send it to you in private.

[bladedush]

my comp handled this fine with a GTX275, running a C2D E8400, and im also watching a movie on my 2nd monitor, so i guess i have more than enough power still :P

[Kelnar7]

@bladedush wow...I guess people on here are actually retarded then? you fucking retarded cunt....watching movies has nothing to do with anything...try running hte program that renders the graphics you dumb cunt

[bladedush]

@Kelnar7

...did you just go back thru 5 months of comments to find mine and bitch about it?

i dont even run that setup anymore, i dont even give a crap bout benchmarking anymore

[deltanalliance]

On the other hand, I have a GTS 250. GPU usage is a pretty massive 26% just trying to play this, not to mention it even spills over to CPU usage

[deltanalliance]

This is what you all get for using Intel graphics, bahahahaha

[poprostujakub4700]

C2D T9900/Mobility Radeon HD 4570 - it works :]

[YourFaceIsMyToPunch]

Free benchmark by playing this video , it eats your GPU alive. Thats what I call value for money :P

[sonofgrayfox]

if crysis 3 uses cryengine 4 or this engine, then i will shit bicks

[fatimmortal]

My PC can't even play this video in 720p. T___________T

[LOLewis101]

@fatimmortal That's nothing. 240p is unachievable with me.

[bIuff3r]

@fatimmortal then get faster internet :P

[fatimmortal]

@bIuff3r My internet is fast enough, my laptop back then sucked balls.

[superbrainification]

@fatimmortal that's why don't get a laptop. Carrying laptops sure look cool, but powerful laptops are far too pricey. 

[fatimmortal]

@superbrainification Well that was a year ago++, now I could find laptops under 5 lbs for 700 bucks that are fully capable of playing games in HD on medium-high settings

[superbrainification]

@fatimmortal $700 is 30,100bucks in our currency.

[WarDinorun]

@fatimmortal my pc lags even on 360p !!!! is 7 years old !!!

[SpadeAce90]

cryengine 3 > 3DMark 11

[Levente20]

@SpadeAce90 ammmmm NO

[slentzz]

i got 3096 score is that good or bad???

[piraka321]

@slentzz on what setting?

its a pretty good score

[slentzz]

@piraka321 on basic d11 at 720p

[piraka321]

@slentzz yea that's a pretty good score.

[slentzz]

@piraka321 thanks mate :-)

[hydramarinee]

they still havent mention the specs for this benchmark and 3dmark11 doesnt support SLI yet. Which makes me think it is probably something in-house. Looks phenomenal though. You have to be a graphic nerd and a hardcore PC gamer to appreciate it.

[jlefebre6001]

huge improvement from vantage.

[csj2085]

Mine can

[masterxilo]

The jungle scene is not that impressive.

[JEIWILBER]

When the scene get more realistic it will not be that impressive cuz its like the common reality.

[LikeAVideo]

@JEIWILBER Would you like to flight over some crazy place to find nice secret places? Or just hop in the game? xD

[JEIWILBER]

@LikeAVideo YESSS , But this is a Realy awesome Jungle ! ! !

.

To me its like 95% realistic.

[Peace7Maker]

@masterxilo

oO

It look like Crysis 3 would certain look like... its at least 3 years ahead of whats possible now...

[TheMistyBlueLounge]

Wow, DL'ing this now but I bet my new laptop will explode when I try and render this!  A quad core i7 processor, with 6gb RAM, too bad my not so pure 435m GT will likely melt!

Maybe I'll actually have enough cash to justify a $2000 machine when this kind of graphics reaches the market!

[cr0ss0ut]

Aww man.... Anyone got a tissue?

[miller45103]

Hmm. Funny. The only part that stuttered is the physics test. Cool!

Windows 7 64x

i7 2.83Ghz

8gigs memory

1TB Hard Drive

ATI Radeon HD5770

1080P

46in Sony Bravia XBR9

[haydenz13]

Wow, this is amazing

[shinji257]

@orpanyd: They have to develop the programs for the technology trend. That's just the way it goes sometimes.

[orpanyd]

The choppiness of the new graphics doesn't bother me as I don't mind that type of progress but what pisses me is that they are now pushing the 16/9 aspect ratio. Either be 1920x1080 or 2560X1440 but anything else means seeing the black bars when viewing on a 16/10 aspect ratio monitor. Mirror's Edge is the same thing, be forced to play the game with the black bars because "Oh I am sorry, my monitor isn't 16/9". It's push, push, push and dipping into your pocket in more ways than one. bullsh I.T.

[WeKillandDie]

@orpanyd

Buy a new 16:9 monitor! ;)

[jlefebre6001]

@orpanyd

i hear you. i want to upgrade to an led monitor from my hp w2408, but ill have to go with a "1080p" monitor. what was wrong with 16:10? why the hell did movies go 16:9? 16:10 is more pixels. more pixels = higher resolution. wtf?

[TheKurrk]

How will this run on a GTX 470?

[xqSoccer]

Can't wait until these types of graphics are introduced into game play.

[Spliffer45]

As i watch this my gtx260 is getting nervous...

[gentlelovingmanUSA]

@Spliffer45 You bet your ass that dx 10 260 is getting nervous.

[Usul573]

@Spliffer45

I wonder what a 5450 would say to 3DMark11, it's obviously made for current super high end stuff but I wonder what lower end stuff with DX11 would do on it, and I wonder if it can complete the entire test.

[rygu79]

@Spliffer45

My 580gtx 3GB sweats heavily through this even, under 20fps at one part. It's brutal.

[kafrick41]

I just watched it in 1080p. That was awesome!

[mebbwebb]

while its not a game...its an engine.

[arnisizz2]

waw man

[GGGIKOE]

the more i watch this video´s the more i wanna get the latest card.

[gundam0051]

Lolz i'm playing this at 1080p on laptop.

[wstorm88]

Lightshafts, tesselation, bad artists, propritetary soft...

For what? For money of poor casuals... You dont want good gameplay, great experience of interaction with software, you just want to buy a new gpu too see a little better virtual reality, because it is all you really have. Stop, where you stand. Look behind. Think. Use Linux.

[FlameBaiter]

will this run on xp?

[billybabin]

@FlameBaiter no of course not its dx11 only vista sp2 with dx11 microsoft patch or windows 7!

[MaikUniversum]

can't wait for this game, looks awesome!

[Intel1502]

@MaikUniversum its not a game.. its benchmarking software.....

[MaikUniversum]

@Intel1502 so it is RPG like game or more action?

[Intel1502]

@MaikUniversum not a game.. its a application that you can run, it will test your computer and tell how much faster it is than other peoples computers ect. I REPEAT, NOT A GAME.

[MaikUniversum]

@Intel1502 to me graphics look good, I think it should run on my PC well. But I would prefer a gameplay video.

[Intel1502]

@MaikUniversum shutup, troll ... -__-

[dano555666]

can I run this on my 360?

:trollface:

[Mario0Dante]

@dano555666 no, only wii can run it

[Alex090]

My pc is getting hot just playing this 1080p movie!

[nidzaPFC]

@Alex download this video and play it in power dvd 10 ;)

[grock6060]

4 highend video cards and ur good to go.. but the electric bill is going to be high  =(

[grock6060]

hope 3x GTX570 would be enough to run this kind of graphics..

[ExpanderDJ]

Intel core i7 920 @ stock

5870 1300/900

ddr3 1600 mhz

5fps average :D

[shigshwa]

@ExpanderDJ And I thought my 27 fps were low enough!

[ositoster]

@ExpanderDJ I have a Phenom II x4 945 @ 3GHz (stock), 2GB DDR3 @ 1333MHz and a HD5450 (650MHz core, 680MHz memory) and I got 4FPS (except in the physics test, in which I got 11FPS).

So either you are lying or something is wrong with your PC.

[alex404404]

This thing better run Minecraft on "fancy"

[imnotstpid]

very nice, i wonder if CE3 can beat it

[Lunaspice]

Prolly an OC´d I7 EE, 8-12 GB RAM, SLI 570 or X-fire 5970 (perhaps even 6970) etc.

[ddd0iii0eee0]

@Lunaspice The highest end card in the 6000's series is the 6990, not the 6970. They changed the order.

[Abb4d0n]

what hardware are you using to run the benchmark so smooth?

[viper0981]

@Abb4d0n This is futuremarks youtube account so theres a good chance they just pre-rendered this at 60fps to show what these benchmarks are supposed to look like.

[wtfbollos]

heavy..

[poly8822]

my pc cant even play this video in 1080p :D