@baracuss123 i don't think so. he has a few unusual ticks. he is speaking too spontaneously for that also. unless he is the fastest reader / talker ever. from what i have seen of his ad-hoc interviews, which i think this is also, he is always quick with his discussion. plus, some people think with their eyes moving. check this guy out: youtube . com /watch?v=Wf4b5Jw9wgE&feature=related
We need to be more concerned about our own nation for a good 4 years. Yes other countries got to handle their own issues. That isn't isolation, that is common sense and self presservation. 13 trillion reasons to mind our own damn business in the future.
Ron Paul is right on. In almost all areas. I disagree with him on some aspects but overall, 98% of his thinking is what needs to happen, and it will happen. It's just do we have time before the dollar collapses and the New Order steps in. Hmmm.. this may be our last chance to get things straight...before it's too late. No one even comes close to Ron and his view. He is the only sane one. God please forbid Mitt Romney to get into office. Where is Ralph Nader these days?
Ron Paul would be a good president for economics, but he's is completely insance when it comes to foreign policy. This guy wants to dissolve the C.I.A and create an isolationist country.
@ConRevolutionary Where did you get that notion? When it comes to foreign policy Ron Paul seems to be the most correct. The CIA is a shadow-govt. It should be dissolved and a new intelligence department should be established. It's not our job to overthrow govts that dont want to subsidize their natural resources for American private companies. Our boys are dying so Halliburton gets a sweet deal. Our boys are dying for private companies, not liberty
@ The C.I.A is very innefiecent I agree,but maybe we should make some changes to it,instead of doing away with it entirely.The C.I.A now is just a building full of desks,we get all our information from second hand forces,and do you really expect a muslim to give information,it says in the quaran to lie to non-believers AKA us.It has nothing to do with companies,if we truly wanted oil we would just take it, but do we?No.How come this war is being fought over oil yet I still pay 3.80 a gallon?
@ConRevolutionary BC the war is not being fought to protect your interests. Its being fought to protect a few corporate interests in the military-industrial complex. Including: big oil, arms manufacturers, and big banks (war means loans!). A pipeline runs through Afghanistan and guess who's guarding it, us. It has nothing to do with saving you money.It has to do with maximizing profit for a handful of oligarchs who have greased the right palms, stealing other countries resources for private gain
@hitlerscow Rofl, the war is about killing sand niggers. It's about getting revenge for 9/11 in Afghanistan, and in Iraq it's about making sure Saddam doesn't ever violate a peace treaty ever again.Big oil has nothing to do with this war, like I said, if were truly about oil we'd have actually taken the fields and flooeded the market, but that didn't happen, OPEC still has us by the ear.The oil pipeline in Afghanistan is a hoax, it never was built, and the company that was behind it is defunct.
@ConRevolutionary The Pentagon has said that it is "too big to be audited" Wtf? A blank check financially and a blank check on power is a really really bad idea.
@hitlerscow The pentagon's funding should be cut by at least half, and we should leave all three of our current military interventions right now. There's no need for a big military currently, so I think we should downsize it. But where I go astray from Mr. Paul is I don't think we should get rid of the C.I.A, the C.I.A is a valuable agency, while grossly inefiecient currently, with reforms we could have one like we had during the cold war.
@ConRevolutionary You have a right to disagree, but Paul has been privy to insider info for over 20 years & has studied CIA blowback throughout history. The wars were not to "kill sand niggers" and to "make sure Saddam doesn't [disobey us]." If that were the case, we'd be gone already, as the mission would be accomplished. You're using classic doublethink. Oil companies make record profits during the wars. You think this is coincidence? Did u forget that all war machines need oil to fight?
@hitlerscow Well,we should have left,but put to much faith in these dune coons to become functioning people,running functioning countries.We've spent nearly a decade in Iraq, and it's not really even very safe, and as soon as we leave there's going to be a massive insurection.We think Afghans can become functioning people,but there even lower than an Arab dog,that is the most backward country in Asia easily.We should have killed anyone and everyone,and as soon as we got Saddam been out of there.
@ConRevolutionary It has nothing to do with the free market. It would not be flooded because they control the supply. They control the supply, they control the price. Guess what happens when prices are manipulated like this? High prices for the consumer, record profits for the corporations that hold all the cards. The military-congressional-complex (including big oil) is real and one of the biggest forces that drive American foreign policy to war.
@hitlerscow Are you stupid? We would floood the market with oil, and that would put OPEC on their knees, wouldn't our leaders want that? Secondly the high prices are caused by a massive array of high taxes on the oil companies, you can thank Mr. Obama for that, remember when Jimmy Carter was president and the oil prices went up? It wasn't gov't manipulation, but huge taxes. The reason we invaded Iraq was because they violated the damned Gulf War treaty, and they were arming up.
@ConRevolutionary Excuse me? Stupid? No. Informed? Yes. How many times do I have to explain the concept before you stop using doublethink? The US does not have a Petrol tax. WTF R U TALKING ABOUT? If you believe Iraq (a country with a 3rd rate military) was a serious threat to ALL of American national security that required over $150 million/day something is seriously wrong with you
@hitlerscow Informed, rofl at that. The tax is $0.48, fucking idiot. Iraq was a paper tiger, like North Korea is now. But they violated the fucking treaty by rebuilding their military. And if we allow countries to disregard treaties, it makes other countries far more willing to violate agreements. The war should have been over as soon as we captured Saddam, but we've stayed there far too long.
@ConRevolutionary the reason we invaded Iraq was because Iraq, North Korea and Iran were all going to switch off the dollar when buying/selling oil and go to the Euro. No way could we have that. Iran is developing Nuke energy as an alternative as well. Yes they may attack Israel, who knows. But this is the inside story. Imagine the world switching off the dollar and going to another currency? Worse thing that could happen.
@sfcdawabn No, it was because Saddam began building a massive military, and violated the treaty he signed after we kicked his ass the first time. It has nothing to do with currency, your actually thinking that Bush could execute such a smart complex conspiracy to make himself rich, when in reality he probably has no idea where Iraq is on a map. Iran is devoloping nuclear plants very stealthily, which points to nuclear weapons, and they all hate the Jews, so what do you think will happen?
@ConRevolutionary The CIA isn't worth a hoot. If they were worth their salt how come they missed 140,000 Soviet soldiers invading Afghanistan? Couldn't protect JFK? Regan? I have worked with CIA. They are a money machine like all other aspects of the government. Ron Paul in 2012
@ConRevolutionary You are wrong to suggest he wants this to be an "isolationist" country. Quite the contrary. He wants open friendly relations with as many other countries as possible. He just doesn't want us to be shoveling money & lives all over the planet, with no end in sight, creating hatred everywhere we go. He wants our international presence to be peaceful, not military. You sound like all the other warhawks that have been dragging our men into harm's way for the last several decades.
@rmcdaniel423 He want to dissolve about 90% of our military, he didn't want us to invade Afghanistan nor Iraq, he seriously would've done nothing had he been in Bush's position, and the camel fuckers would be running around commiting acts of terrorism to this day. That's isolationism, he's an old fashioned 1940's conservative, the ones who opposed WWII.... Also our military prescence isn't optional, the U.N and N.A.T.O is too pussy to do anything itself so unfortunately it's up to us.
@ConRevolutionary He does not oppose defending the US, nor does he oppose a strong military. He just opposes military bases in every corner of the planet, and invading other nations and then staying for decades at a time, at the expense of our global reputation and our economy. Your "camel fucker" comment shows the true depth of your intellect. Thanks for sharing.
@rmcdaniel423 That's an isolationist, you reinforced my point.We should have left Iraq years ago, and we should leave Afghanistan now.We should have invaded Iraq,killed Saddam, seized the oil fields, then let the Sunnis,Khurds,and Shi'ites kill each other,less muslims = a better world.America is forced to be the world police,if we weren't the world police the world would be less safe,now I don't really like the idea of us being world police,but the U.N forces us to.
@ConRevolutionary We are not, and cannot afford to be the worlds police. The kids around the world are just going to have to learn to play nice with one another
Only man that knows the answers to fix the country. He could save us in 2012 but he wont run because his own asshole party would never give him the nomination because there money pouches would go away with the special interest and banksters.
You're right. It's their biggest blind spot. They also don't understand how their approach of government lead reform leads to authoritarianism. Put the two together and you get fascism or communism every time.
..good point, and no gloating or self-promotion. If our current president had made these predictions, he would be tooting their own horn immediately, while Mr. Paul instantly downplays his correct economic forecasting to give credit to the economists he's studied.
@hobieslug45 Except in this video where he stumbles over himself when he gets exposed being disingenuous when he boasted about voting against pork since he was stuffing bills with pork.
/watch?v=GyPLFKUdhqY
He tripped over his words there but really quickly and smoothly turned it around. The man's pathological he doesn't need to look for words.
@Laughingblades very interesting vid. I guess if your a part of the heard you have to run with it . like paul jesse ventura does not believe in term limits the difference is jesse left office after one term.
@hobieslug45 You're part of the herd if you can't acknowledge that the man's a disingenuous hypocrite there. Ron Paul is not perfect, all the politicians are shit but you Paul sycophants treat yours like a religious messiah and rationalize away what you would utterly condemn any other politician for, because you're intellectually dishonest, you don't care about the truth or being consistent in your standards, all you care about is glorifying your glorious leader. It's a cult of personality.
@hobieslug45 So I guess you missed the part where he got busted stuffing earmarks into bills and disingenuously sat there and said "I never voted for an earmark". I guess you also missed the part where his district gets disproportionate federal aid, even taking priority over a disaster zone, which mind you both are coastal districts. Oh well nice to know getting an old harmless sunken ship out of a bay was a good use of federal funding over giving people shelter who's lives were destroyed.
@Laughingblades your an ass hole if you think I'm a ron paul supporter and no I didn't miss the part where they talked about the earmarks . that's old news to me I new this 11 years ago when he ran for president . johnny come latelies like you can't tell me something I already know . I stopped voting 12 years ago so I couldn't give a shit who you vote for or who votes for ron paul. He sheds light on the fed. something I've been bitching about since that scumbag nixion took usof gold standard
The focus should be on the 2010 midterms. All 435 house seats and 36 senate seats are up for grabs. Get some more folks in Congress like Dr. Paul so he can be able to run in 2012!
Dr. Paul energized and educated a generation. What a great and brave man he is. 2012 if America still stands as a free Republic; we will see a dramatic shift in the political landscape. Most members of Congress have to leave and go get real jobs.
It is actally sad that austrian economics is the only [modern] school of economics that actually resemble reality
The rest of acadamia can't stop believing in free lunch BULLSHIT from charlatans, scammers, and snake-oil salesmen and I can't tell if it's an infantile belief in a fantasious power to change reality by fiat or their own fatal conceit or both
whether your natural inclinations are towards the left or right (in my case the left), EVERYONE should appreciate Paul for being that rarest & most precious of things: a properly honest politician.
The Federal Reserve is illegal by the constitution. Private bankers own the federal reserve and it isn't even federal. only congress is suuposed to be able to control the money supply. instead, private bankers control it. the same bankers that own the federal reserve own the mass media and the currencies all over the world. the paper isn't even backed by gold. the international bankers are creating chaos in order to take over the world and make the pope the world emperor.
Funny how all of the MSM demeans and calls Paul a kook when he ran for POTUS. Now that that's passed they put him on a pedestal and "He's always right!" I'm sure they'll revert back to kook and "Totally wrong!" again if he runs in 2012.
I agree with you, especially the way Fox news, Glenn Beck, and Charles Gibson treated Dr Paul - except I believe Joe and Mika have always treated Dr Paul with total respect.
I could support Ron Paul if he didn't keep trying to push a pro-life agenda or if he admitted there is a right to privacy in the constitution. How can he believe that any government, state or federal, has any right to criminalize what people do in the privacy of their bedroom? "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." I'd say two consenting adults have a right to do whatever they please in private.
Ron Paul talks a lot about privacy from government so I'm not sure where you are coming from with that one. He has also never said that consenting adults should be restricted on what they do in private. Again, not sure where that one came from. He also doesn't push a pro-life agenda. He is pro-life but also states that it has absolutely nothing to do with the Feds because of the enumerated powers. It is a state matter via the 10th amendment. Come to the Paul Side!
What are you talking about? Pro Life-? Ron Paul Simply wants the debate and decisions put down to and decided at the state level. If Nevada says it is OK to kill your kids...then Kill 'em...But if Texas says you can't ...then you have to move to Nevada. How is that a Pro Life agenda?. It's Libertarianism. Best you keep quiet if you don't know what you are talking about because no one will know how ill-informed you are
He thinks life starts at conception.. and that its best left up to the states to decide whether they are pro life or pro choice. The only thing he isn't for is for that decision to be made at the federal level.
Capitalism is nither innocent nor guilty, it's the people and their actions that decide good or bad, and some people in the financial sector were very, very bad. The government may have taken them to the financial buffet, but they're the ones who couldn't help themselves. Not all banks were horribly irresponsible. The private sector is not helpless.
I will agree with Ron Paul on one thing, corporatism is our biggest threat. If the private sector owns the government, we have no freedom.
Capitalism is innocent. its the bankers that are milking capitalism for they can. free market is cpitalism if the private sector has taken control of the governmet then its an oligarchy. capitalism is not to blame here.
Isn't the Huffington post the liberal rag that drug up old news about Ron Paul at the last minute. Right as the Republican primary got under way, calling him a racist. News that the MSM picked up because it was negative, and they were not allowed to give Ron Paul any positive coverage. Things like, Ron Paul won every Republican Debate, raised more money from "real" people than all other Republicans combined, raised more money in a single day that any candidate in History.
In this day and age, ppl should have had enough sense to do research on ALL the canidates running for president instead of just sitting on the couch letting the news tell them who to vote for. I rallied so hard behind ron paul, only to get who? or ya i heard something bout him being a nut case on the news...i tryed......
I wonder what Ron Paul thinks about his fellow Republican Ronald Reagan, who pushed this credit-based wealth culture and, like he calls it, corporatism. All of these abuses have been made in the name of capitalism, free-market, freedom, conservatism, and what not. Republicans are able to fool the masses with a message of fiscal responsibility and patriotism, and people believe it, while they've been setting up a new form of feudalism. Dr Paul seems different from other GOPers but let's see...
Look at some of his interviews and videos here on youtube. He has said before that he supported Reagan when he TALKED about smaller government, but that Reagan only talked about it and the size of government actually increased during his time in office.
I give credit to these acts of punditry for inviting ron paul to the discussion. I absolutely despised the shovenist scarsborough, but Paul was worth is pinheadedness.
He has become the one politician i trust to follow reality, unfortunately even he cannot completely predict the outcome of a presidency such as his. Paul is read to stick america's chin out to take a huge blow, before the so called unavoidable punch we will take in his eyes. The economy however is riddled with fantasy.
Ariana from Huffington looks like a complete moron... She wanders from some amendmnt to the New York Times, to "the children!" (cue gasps of sadness), then some criticisms that amount too "the banks are bad, because they're bad?" Please, I agree with her on some parts but she just seems to be out of her league with Dr. Paul.
funny how republican's wouldn't even give him air time on faux news during the election. Their 1 intelligent politician and they shunned him because he didn't fall in step on the Iraq war. And guess what, HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT THAT TOO.
Yeah i agree with you bfayer. I do like fox news, but I thought it disgusting that people like Hannity tried to defame him with arguments in interveiws. Foz totally made a mistake by not supporting RP. I can tell you though, the left media was the same. They all support who they want and the party supports the candidate who draws the most special interest. This whole govt is run by special interest and it needs to stop.
How many times has the United States had to abolish it's central bank and replaced it with something else? 2 times now? Do you honestly believe that doing it for a third time will change anything?
Exactly. The same greedy bastards will still find a way to get there hands on our money. They can exploit any market type or form of govt. they wish. There is no cure but to perfect the human soul. We're fucked.
Ron Paul seems honest and he said the hard truth, the vast majority in our country would chose status quo over Paul's tough medicine because nobody wants to go through the pains of detox, and that is why he will never be president. The Republican party will never allow him to run, FoxNews already chose Mitt Romney to run against Obama, so forget about it. By the time the 2012 primaries are here they will ridicule him again on Fox and kick him out of the debates like last year.
nah its all about knowing the financial cycle of the central bank & all lesser banks in the country. The time to get money back from the streets, the time of bank investments outside the country & coming back as cash. the financial internal cycle of lesser banks in relationship to the central. If you can manage the timimg, the seasons with some good nice predicting models you can use inflation and tax rates in your benefit. ..lobbys just let some experienced diplomatic guys start lobby ofiices
in all fairness to the people of the US, first i dont vote because its pointless, however if every single american voted for Ron Paul, he still wouldn't be the president because the electoral college vote are the only ones that truly count.
So which political party do you think is going to put Ron Paul on the ticket? Republicans think he's too left or at least too far from the right, and the left is going to stick with Obama...i'd like to see him run as an independant, but that rarely works.
tell ya what, if any of you is in contact with someone YOU KNOW was connected with Ron's campaign, like Justine Lam or Debbie Hopper or Andrew Ward or Joe Seehusen, why don't you just ask them about me? They're all friends of mine.
In the meantime, let's promote Ron! Did you guys know that Rand Paul and Peter Schiff are both going to be on Morning Joe this Thurs (9/16)? That's exciting!
Does it get more shallow than Mika Brzezinski, the preppy hairdo who disdained Ron Paul as "a nut" in the Republican primaries? I must confess that I felt sympathy for the guy who mugged her $6 while she was waiting for a cab ;P
You have to understand that most of those that are being extreme in this Movement are more so emboldened by propaganda from people like Glenn Beck, though he makes sidelining good lines about freedom and transparency and limited govt. The idea of misinterpretation is too big now. There is such a big disconnect between what the bills actually give power to and who controls that power. Even though some points may be true not all should be believed it takes a proper education to really get it.
I grew up in Ron's dist., he delivered 2 of my cousins, my dad works w/his oldest son, Ronnie Jr., I was Ron's Field Coord. in my state as well as the founder & national coord. of Homeschoolers for Ron Paul & until recently the Campaign for Liberty state coordinator for my state. I have his home phone and personal email address. I haven't known Joe as long, but talk to, email or txt with him on a da basis. So, yes I know them both. Is it really that hard to believe? They're both just men.
No convincing you I actually do know them, huh? Oh well.
I'm still puzzled by this comment "People who truly know a politician..." u do realize politicians work for u, right? They're just people- your employees n fact. Why is it such a big deal to know a politician? If your reps. don't know your name & face, you're not involved enough. Have you done what Ron told us to do? Have u gotten involved with the local & state party? Are u making a difference?
The great thing about RP is that he is not necessarily a genius, he's a very honest man pointing out the obvious. There's no complexity to what he's talking about. It's simple math
ariaane where do you get your numbers and who are you to say 95% crazies? Oh i get it you were the other 5% as usual. I can't believe you went back to sleep maybe it's better. Ron paul das always said that it was our revolution not his.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Fine.
But you Ron Paul lovers treat the Ron Paul movement as if it is a RELIGION.
You guys need to step back, and check yourselves, becasue your conduct is turning many people away from any legitimate points you may have.
I am socially conservative, and was fiscally conservative up until recently. I now am hovering between fiscal and moderate conservatism, as I've learned to think for myself, and not just repeat Ron Paul talking points.
It's not about Ron Paul. It never was, certainly not for me. If you argue that Paul did not get any support from anti-war (war on drugs, MIC) "liberals", as did Kucinich and other non-mainstream candidates, then it is you who are delusional.
Ummm, I'm a classical liberal, and I "follow" him or if you will, agree with on on every stance. If you really get irritated at Ron Paul supporters, then ignore them. I don't really care if they believe in a 9/11 conspiracy, just as long as they look up and learn the austrian business cycle.
Well call me Shirley...Finally! Mother of GOD! Some recognized MAINSTREAM MEDIA credit for this...I want to hurl everytime I hear Limbaugh/Hannity/Beck, claiming credit for the Liberty movement. Claiming that THEY predicted the financial crisis. That THEY'RE the defenders of the Constitution- makes me SICK. and Thank you Joe you've always been respectful-
I have to agree with ryanjiii - these two are long time friends. Considering the disrespect Dr Paul received during the Presidential primary debates from Fox news and Charles Gibson, Joe's interviews are refreshing.
We need competing currencies. Once we feel there is corruption in one currency we can choose to use the other. Ron Paul knows the crooks want one "rigged" currency
Too little, too late. Of course he is always right: He's not a NWO puppet like all of the rest, he is a puplic servant who has the people's best interest in mind and not the corporations and elites.
Lobbying should be banned. It is legalized bribery.
Huffington Post is full of economic illiterate statists who convulse as the sight of an R. Just ignore the idiots or laugh in the face, since they're no better than the neocons at LFG or HotAir.
Ron Paul is the constitutional tow truck that will get us out of this ditch.
jjenningsoh 1 month ago
Impeach O B O M B M A now!! there is enough evidence, impeach before he destroys us all.
johnnycmajor 4 months ago
eyes keep shifting to his right. hes reading?
baracuss123 5 months ago
@baracuss123 i don't think so. he has a few unusual ticks. he is speaking too spontaneously for that also. unless he is the fastest reader / talker ever. from what i have seen of his ad-hoc interviews, which i think this is also, he is always quick with his discussion. plus, some people think with their eyes moving. check this guy out: youtube . com /watch?v=Wf4b5Jw9wgE&feature=related
NZDuriahheap 5 months ago
We need to be more concerned about our own nation for a good 4 years. Yes other countries got to handle their own issues. That isn't isolation, that is common sense and self presservation. 13 trillion reasons to mind our own damn business in the future.
sfcdawabn 5 months ago
Ron Paul is right on. In almost all areas. I disagree with him on some aspects but overall, 98% of his thinking is what needs to happen, and it will happen. It's just do we have time before the dollar collapses and the New Order steps in. Hmmm.. this may be our last chance to get things straight...before it's too late. No one even comes close to Ron and his view. He is the only sane one. God please forbid Mitt Romney to get into office. Where is Ralph Nader these days?
sfcdawabn 5 months ago
Ron Paul would be a good president for economics, but he's is completely insance when it comes to foreign policy. This guy wants to dissolve the C.I.A and create an isolationist country.
ConRevolutionary 6 months ago
@ConRevolutionary Where did you get that notion? When it comes to foreign policy Ron Paul seems to be the most correct. The CIA is a shadow-govt. It should be dissolved and a new intelligence department should be established. It's not our job to overthrow govts that dont want to subsidize their natural resources for American private companies. Our boys are dying so Halliburton gets a sweet deal. Our boys are dying for private companies, not liberty
Its called non-intervention, just-war theory
hitlerscow 6 months ago
@ The C.I.A is very innefiecent I agree,but maybe we should make some changes to it,instead of doing away with it entirely.The C.I.A now is just a building full of desks,we get all our information from second hand forces,and do you really expect a muslim to give information,it says in the quaran to lie to non-believers AKA us.It has nothing to do with companies,if we truly wanted oil we would just take it, but do we?No.How come this war is being fought over oil yet I still pay 3.80 a gallon?
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary BC the war is not being fought to protect your interests. Its being fought to protect a few corporate interests in the military-industrial complex. Including: big oil, arms manufacturers, and big banks (war means loans!). A pipeline runs through Afghanistan and guess who's guarding it, us. It has nothing to do with saving you money.It has to do with maximizing profit for a handful of oligarchs who have greased the right palms, stealing other countries resources for private gain
hitlerscow 5 months ago
@hitlerscow Rofl, the war is about killing sand niggers. It's about getting revenge for 9/11 in Afghanistan, and in Iraq it's about making sure Saddam doesn't ever violate a peace treaty ever again.Big oil has nothing to do with this war, like I said, if were truly about oil we'd have actually taken the fields and flooeded the market, but that didn't happen, OPEC still has us by the ear.The oil pipeline in Afghanistan is a hoax, it never was built, and the company that was behind it is defunct.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary The Pentagon has said that it is "too big to be audited" Wtf? A blank check financially and a blank check on power is a really really bad idea.
hitlerscow 5 months ago
@hitlerscow The pentagon's funding should be cut by at least half, and we should leave all three of our current military interventions right now. There's no need for a big military currently, so I think we should downsize it. But where I go astray from Mr. Paul is I don't think we should get rid of the C.I.A, the C.I.A is a valuable agency, while grossly inefiecient currently, with reforms we could have one like we had during the cold war.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary You have a right to disagree, but Paul has been privy to insider info for over 20 years & has studied CIA blowback throughout history. The wars were not to "kill sand niggers" and to "make sure Saddam doesn't [disobey us]." If that were the case, we'd be gone already, as the mission would be accomplished. You're using classic doublethink. Oil companies make record profits during the wars. You think this is coincidence? Did u forget that all war machines need oil to fight?
hitlerscow 5 months ago
@hitlerscow Well,we should have left,but put to much faith in these dune coons to become functioning people,running functioning countries.We've spent nearly a decade in Iraq, and it's not really even very safe, and as soon as we leave there's going to be a massive insurection.We think Afghans can become functioning people,but there even lower than an Arab dog,that is the most backward country in Asia easily.We should have killed anyone and everyone,and as soon as we got Saddam been out of there.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary It has nothing to do with the free market. It would not be flooded because they control the supply. They control the supply, they control the price. Guess what happens when prices are manipulated like this? High prices for the consumer, record profits for the corporations that hold all the cards. The military-congressional-complex (including big oil) is real and one of the biggest forces that drive American foreign policy to war.
hitlerscow 5 months ago
@hitlerscow Are you stupid? We would floood the market with oil, and that would put OPEC on their knees, wouldn't our leaders want that? Secondly the high prices are caused by a massive array of high taxes on the oil companies, you can thank Mr. Obama for that, remember when Jimmy Carter was president and the oil prices went up? It wasn't gov't manipulation, but huge taxes. The reason we invaded Iraq was because they violated the damned Gulf War treaty, and they were arming up.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary Excuse me? Stupid? No. Informed? Yes. How many times do I have to explain the concept before you stop using doublethink? The US does not have a Petrol tax. WTF R U TALKING ABOUT? If you believe Iraq (a country with a 3rd rate military) was a serious threat to ALL of American national security that required over $150 million/day something is seriously wrong with you
hitlerscow 5 months ago
@hitlerscow Informed, rofl at that. The tax is $0.48, fucking idiot. Iraq was a paper tiger, like North Korea is now. But they violated the fucking treaty by rebuilding their military. And if we allow countries to disregard treaties, it makes other countries far more willing to violate agreements. The war should have been over as soon as we captured Saddam, but we've stayed there far too long.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary the reason we invaded Iraq was because Iraq, North Korea and Iran were all going to switch off the dollar when buying/selling oil and go to the Euro. No way could we have that. Iran is developing Nuke energy as an alternative as well. Yes they may attack Israel, who knows. But this is the inside story. Imagine the world switching off the dollar and going to another currency? Worse thing that could happen.
sfcdawabn 5 months ago
@sfcdawabn No, it was because Saddam began building a massive military, and violated the treaty he signed after we kicked his ass the first time. It has nothing to do with currency, your actually thinking that Bush could execute such a smart complex conspiracy to make himself rich, when in reality he probably has no idea where Iraq is on a map. Iran is devoloping nuclear plants very stealthily, which points to nuclear weapons, and they all hate the Jews, so what do you think will happen?
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary Far worse than 4000 American lives, at least to the Federal Reserve and other Central banks in Europe.
sfcdawabn 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary The CIA isn't worth a hoot. If they were worth their salt how come they missed 140,000 Soviet soldiers invading Afghanistan? Couldn't protect JFK? Regan? I have worked with CIA. They are a money machine like all other aspects of the government. Ron Paul in 2012
sfcdawabn 5 months ago
@sfcdawabn Now. The C.I.A of before the 80s was a ass kicking machine, but the C.I.A has become as bad as the rest of the federal gov't.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
It's isolationism, if Ron Paul were a Republican in the 1930s he'd fit right in line, but this is 2011.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary You are wrong to suggest he wants this to be an "isolationist" country. Quite the contrary. He wants open friendly relations with as many other countries as possible. He just doesn't want us to be shoveling money & lives all over the planet, with no end in sight, creating hatred everywhere we go. He wants our international presence to be peaceful, not military. You sound like all the other warhawks that have been dragging our men into harm's way for the last several decades.
rmcdaniel423 6 months ago
@rmcdaniel423 He want to dissolve about 90% of our military, he didn't want us to invade Afghanistan nor Iraq, he seriously would've done nothing had he been in Bush's position, and the camel fuckers would be running around commiting acts of terrorism to this day. That's isolationism, he's an old fashioned 1940's conservative, the ones who opposed WWII.... Also our military prescence isn't optional, the U.N and N.A.T.O is too pussy to do anything itself so unfortunately it's up to us.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary He does not oppose defending the US, nor does he oppose a strong military. He just opposes military bases in every corner of the planet, and invading other nations and then staying for decades at a time, at the expense of our global reputation and our economy. Your "camel fucker" comment shows the true depth of your intellect. Thanks for sharing.
rmcdaniel423 5 months ago
@rmcdaniel423 That's an isolationist, you reinforced my point.We should have left Iraq years ago, and we should leave Afghanistan now.We should have invaded Iraq,killed Saddam, seized the oil fields, then let the Sunnis,Khurds,and Shi'ites kill each other,less muslims = a better world.America is forced to be the world police,if we weren't the world police the world would be less safe,now I don't really like the idea of us being world police,but the U.N forces us to.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
@ConRevolutionary We are not, and cannot afford to be the worlds police. The kids around the world are just going to have to learn to play nice with one another
sfcdawabn 5 months ago
@sfcdawabn We have to, no one else will do it. The U.N is a failure. But overall I can agree with you.
ConRevolutionary 5 months ago
its simple...listen...ron paul knows his facts..he knows economics well...
thats how his predictions come true..get this dam guy into power usa before its too late...
davycrocketful 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul 2012!
The only honest and constitutional presidential candidate! Research his consistent voting record and decide for yourself.
Ron Paul 2012!
Help end the PRIVATELY-OWNED Federal Reserve!
Campaign for Liberty
Website
1XMarksSpot 8 months ago
Paul/Napolitano 2012!!!
BettyFordGalaxy 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@BettyFordGalaxy
Ron Paul 2012!
The only honest and constitutional presidential candidate! Research his consistent voting record and decide for yourself.
Ron Paul 2012!
Help end the PRIVATELY-OWNED Federal Reserve!
Campaign for Liberty
Website
1XMarksSpot 8 months ago
Banned Youtbe Video "MLK/RONPAUL"must see :)
condemned13 10 months ago
Only man that knows the answers to fix the country. He could save us in 2012 but he wont run because his own asshole party would never give him the nomination because there money pouches would go away with the special interest and banksters.
Kavenger11 10 months ago
Ron Paul 2012
divegator 10 months ago
Ron Paul and Arianna Huffington agreeing on banking and capitalism- didn't see that coming!
jmag321 1 year ago 2
Good interview, even though she hacked the name of Ron's book there are the end.
KDanagger 1 year ago
ron paul for president now and forever! bush and obama are nazis controlled by the new world order, visit infowars.com.
normalguyable 1 year ago 4
Greeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeen acres is the place to be...
DSCW33 1 year ago
@DSCW33 I love you darling but give me Park Avenue...
stevefye 1 year ago
I am very happy to msmbc is embracing Ron Paul. It is about time.
annboylyn 1 year ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
go to my channel i have obama messing up bad
TheSek78 2 years ago
liberals don't understand how big government paves the way for corporatism..I wish they knew..
scott04la 2 years ago 10
This has been flagged as spam show
liberalism is a mental disorder.
manofreedom 2 years ago
You're right. It's their biggest blind spot. They also don't understand how their approach of government lead reform leads to authoritarianism. Put the two together and you get fascism or communism every time.
rctube1958 1 year ago 3
Comment removed
xsleef 2 years ago
ron paul....
the key to save america :)
he's the shit. every thing he's about will get america out of this rut!
aptxxxtimmy 2 years ago 45
This has been flagged as spam show
@aptxxxtimmy
Ron Paul 2012!
The only honest and constitutional presidential candidate! Research his consistent voting record and decide for yourself.
Ron Paul 2012!
Help end the PRIVATELY-OWNED Federal Reserve!
Campaign for Liberty
Website
1XMarksSpot 8 months ago
notice pauls answers, no hesitation, never searching for the right words. like other politicians who want to get votes from all sides of the isle.
and he gets asked some questions that other politicians wouldn't be asked .
hobieslug45 2 years ago 53
..good point, and no gloating or self-promotion. If our current president had made these predictions, he would be tooting their own horn immediately, while Mr. Paul instantly downplays his correct economic forecasting to give credit to the economists he's studied.
scott04la 2 years ago 5
This has been flagged as spam show
@hobieslug45
Ron Paul 2012!
The only honest and constitutional presidential candidate! Research his consistent voting record and decide for yourself.
Ron Paul 2012!
Help end the PRIVATELY-OWNED Federal Reserve!
Campaign for Liberty
Website
1XMarksSpot 8 months ago
@hobieslug45 Except in this video where he stumbles over himself when he gets exposed being disingenuous when he boasted about voting against pork since he was stuffing bills with pork.
/watch?v=GyPLFKUdhqY
He tripped over his words there but really quickly and smoothly turned it around. The man's pathological he doesn't need to look for words.
Laughingblades 2 months ago
@Laughingblades very interesting vid. I guess if your a part of the heard you have to run with it . like paul jesse ventura does not believe in term limits the difference is jesse left office after one term.
hobieslug45 2 months ago
@hobieslug45 You're part of the herd if you can't acknowledge that the man's a disingenuous hypocrite there. Ron Paul is not perfect, all the politicians are shit but you Paul sycophants treat yours like a religious messiah and rationalize away what you would utterly condemn any other politician for, because you're intellectually dishonest, you don't care about the truth or being consistent in your standards, all you care about is glorifying your glorious leader. It's a cult of personality.
Laughingblades 2 months ago
@Laughingblades all though in his position he does reach a lot of people and help them to see the truth.
hobieslug45 2 months ago
@hobieslug45 So I guess you missed the part where he got busted stuffing earmarks into bills and disingenuously sat there and said "I never voted for an earmark". I guess you also missed the part where his district gets disproportionate federal aid, even taking priority over a disaster zone, which mind you both are coastal districts. Oh well nice to know getting an old harmless sunken ship out of a bay was a good use of federal funding over giving people shelter who's lives were destroyed.
Laughingblades 2 months ago
@Laughingblades your an ass hole if you think I'm a ron paul supporter and no I didn't miss the part where they talked about the earmarks . that's old news to me I new this 11 years ago when he ran for president . johnny come latelies like you can't tell me something I already know . I stopped voting 12 years ago so I couldn't give a shit who you vote for or who votes for ron paul. He sheds light on the fed. something I've been bitching about since that scumbag nixion took usof gold standard
hobieslug45 2 months ago
Respond to this video... personally know I can give a shit about you or ron paul. so don't respond to this I have to clean my weapons today
hobieslug45 2 months ago
The focus should be on the 2010 midterms. All 435 house seats and 36 senate seats are up for grabs. Get some more folks in Congress like Dr. Paul so he can be able to run in 2012!
kingjames1014 2 years ago 3
Dr. Paul energized and educated a generation. What a great and brave man he is. 2012 if America still stands as a free Republic; we will see a dramatic shift in the political landscape. Most members of Congress have to leave and go get real jobs.
ronheri 2 years ago 4
6:53 to 6:55 is the grim fact of this.
melchert6 2 years ago
It is actally sad that austrian economics is the only [modern] school of economics that actually resemble reality
The rest of acadamia can't stop believing in free lunch BULLSHIT from charlatans, scammers, and snake-oil salesmen and I can't tell if it's an infantile belief in a fantasious power to change reality by fiat or their own fatal conceit or both
Sinisterene 2 years ago 3
whether your natural inclinations are towards the left or right (in my case the left), EVERYONE should appreciate Paul for being that rarest & most precious of things: a properly honest politician.
huthut91 2 years ago 7
impeach barak obama. he's a puppet of the new world order.
gloryboundkev 2 years ago 8
The Federal Reserve is illegal by the constitution. Private bankers own the federal reserve and it isn't even federal. only congress is suuposed to be able to control the money supply. instead, private bankers control it. the same bankers that own the federal reserve own the mass media and the currencies all over the world. the paper isn't even backed by gold. the international bankers are creating chaos in order to take over the world and make the pope the world emperor.
gloryboundkev 2 years ago 4
Funny how all of the MSM demeans and calls Paul a kook when he ran for POTUS. Now that that's passed they put him on a pedestal and "He's always right!" I'm sure they'll revert back to kook and "Totally wrong!" again if he runs in 2012.
PatriotReport 2 years ago 2
I agree with you, especially the way Fox news, Glenn Beck, and Charles Gibson treated Dr Paul - except I believe Joe and Mika have always treated Dr Paul with total respect.
cato58 2 years ago
It's either libertarianism or tyranny. Those are our only choices. All the American's arguing FOR tyranny make me sick!
Isms, shmisms...(see above) We have only two choices and we HAVE tyranny NOW!
I vote for liberty for all.
(That's an unpopular and minority vote in today's USA)
uhclem 2 years ago
I could support Ron Paul if he didn't keep trying to push a pro-life agenda or if he admitted there is a right to privacy in the constitution. How can he believe that any government, state or federal, has any right to criminalize what people do in the privacy of their bedroom? "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." I'd say two consenting adults have a right to do whatever they please in private.
paulflorez 2 years ago
Ron Paul talks a lot about privacy from government so I'm not sure where you are coming from with that one. He has also never said that consenting adults should be restricted on what they do in private. Again, not sure where that one came from. He also doesn't push a pro-life agenda. He is pro-life but also states that it has absolutely nothing to do with the Feds because of the enumerated powers. It is a state matter via the 10th amendment. Come to the Paul Side!
teebteeb1268 2 years ago
What are you talking about? Pro Life-? Ron Paul Simply wants the debate and decisions put down to and decided at the state level. If Nevada says it is OK to kill your kids...then Kill 'em...But if Texas says you can't ...then you have to move to Nevada. How is that a Pro Life agenda?. It's Libertarianism. Best you keep quiet if you don't know what you are talking about because no one will know how ill-informed you are
dazzle8971 2 years ago
He thinks life starts at conception.. and that its best left up to the states to decide whether they are pro life or pro choice. The only thing he isn't for is for that decision to be made at the federal level.
stix42k 2 years ago
Comment removed
americanempireprojec 2 years ago
Lucius Quinctius Cincinnatus = Ron Paul
Uncle Sam takes his hat off when Dr Paul goes by
punished4honesty 2 years ago
Comment removed
WeBeGood06 2 years ago
There you go
It ant capitalism its an oligarchy
Alls those dick heads blaming innocent capitalism better wake up or there going to destroy the best thing that ever happend to the human race
spanishaustralian 2 years ago
Capitalism is nither innocent nor guilty, it's the people and their actions that decide good or bad, and some people in the financial sector were very, very bad. The government may have taken them to the financial buffet, but they're the ones who couldn't help themselves. Not all banks were horribly irresponsible. The private sector is not helpless.
I will agree with Ron Paul on one thing, corporatism is our biggest threat. If the private sector owns the government, we have no freedom.
paulflorez 2 years ago
Capitalism is innocent. its the bankers that are milking capitalism for they can. free market is cpitalism if the private sector has taken control of the governmet then its an oligarchy. capitalism is not to blame here.
spanishaustralian 2 years ago
her accent is awful...
audiohi 2 years ago
Great to see Huffington and Paul agreeing. Nice video.
redskins55 2 years ago
Isn't the Huffington post the liberal rag that drug up old news about Ron Paul at the last minute. Right as the Republican primary got under way, calling him a racist. News that the MSM picked up because it was negative, and they were not allowed to give Ron Paul any positive coverage. Things like, Ron Paul won every Republican Debate, raised more money from "real" people than all other Republicans combined, raised more money in a single day that any candidate in History.
WeBeGood06 2 years ago
In this day and age, ppl should have had enough sense to do research on ALL the canidates running for president instead of just sitting on the couch letting the news tell them who to vote for. I rallied so hard behind ron paul, only to get who? or ya i heard something bout him being a nut case on the news...i tryed......
YarrowElfwind 2 years ago
I wonder what Ron Paul thinks about his fellow Republican Ronald Reagan, who pushed this credit-based wealth culture and, like he calls it, corporatism. All of these abuses have been made in the name of capitalism, free-market, freedom, conservatism, and what not. Republicans are able to fool the masses with a message of fiscal responsibility and patriotism, and people believe it, while they've been setting up a new form of feudalism. Dr Paul seems different from other GOPers but let's see...
oldtownkid 2 years ago
Look at some of his interviews and videos here on youtube. He has said before that he supported Reagan when he TALKED about smaller government, but that Reagan only talked about it and the size of government actually increased during his time in office.
Kh0ldstare 2 years ago
I hate Arianna Huffington
fakenewz 2 years ago
truth hurts or is it the accent?
oldtownkid 2 years ago
I give credit to these acts of punditry for inviting ron paul to the discussion. I absolutely despised the shovenist scarsborough, but Paul was worth is pinheadedness.
He has become the one politician i trust to follow reality, unfortunately even he cannot completely predict the outcome of a presidency such as his. Paul is read to stick america's chin out to take a huge blow, before the so called unavoidable punch we will take in his eyes. The economy however is riddled with fantasy.
stewscum 2 years ago
Comment removed
Moorington 2 years ago
Ariana from Huffington looks like a complete moron... She wanders from some amendmnt to the New York Times, to "the children!" (cue gasps of sadness), then some criticisms that amount too "the banks are bad, because they're bad?" Please, I agree with her on some parts but she just seems to be out of her league with Dr. Paul.
Moorington 2 years ago 3
funny how republican's wouldn't even give him air time on faux news during the election. Their 1 intelligent politician and they shunned him because he didn't fall in step on the Iraq war. And guess what, HE WAS RIGHT ABOUT THAT TOO.
bfayer 2 years ago 3
Yeah i agree with you bfayer. I do like fox news, but I thought it disgusting that people like Hannity tried to defame him with arguments in interveiws. Foz totally made a mistake by not supporting RP. I can tell you though, the left media was the same. They all support who they want and the party supports the candidate who draws the most special interest. This whole govt is run by special interest and it needs to stop.
Zoklor 2 years ago 2
Audit the Federal Reserve, then abolish it!
maximusdecimus888 2 years ago 5
How many times has the United States had to abolish it's central bank and replaced it with something else? 2 times now? Do you honestly believe that doing it for a third time will change anything?
JimmyeDallas 2 years ago
Exactly. The same greedy bastards will still find a way to get there hands on our money. They can exploit any market type or form of govt. they wish. There is no cure but to perfect the human soul. We're fucked.
BraaapMan2000 2 years ago
Ron Paul is my president
audioX1 2 years ago 4
If Ron Paul is your President then Bruno is your first lady!
StinkingHombre 2 years ago
what does that even mean?
lazysac 2 years ago
Ron Paul is Bruno's lover, did you not see the movie they where both in?
StinkingHombre 2 years ago
Ron Paul seems honest and he said the hard truth, the vast majority in our country would chose status quo over Paul's tough medicine because nobody wants to go through the pains of detox, and that is why he will never be president. The Republican party will never allow him to run, FoxNews already chose Mitt Romney to run against Obama, so forget about it. By the time the 2012 primaries are here they will ridicule him again on Fox and kick him out of the debates like last year.
oldtownkid 2 years ago 2
nah its all about knowing the financial cycle of the central bank & all lesser banks in the country. The time to get money back from the streets, the time of bank investments outside the country & coming back as cash. the financial internal cycle of lesser banks in relationship to the central. If you can manage the timimg, the seasons with some good nice predicting models you can use inflation and tax rates in your benefit. ..lobbys just let some experienced diplomatic guys start lobby ofiices
soulmony 2 years ago
This is supposed to be surprising? Americans needa lay off Main Stream's cock.
SySt3m 2 years ago
Ron Paul for President! WOW! Where have I been.
getjjg 2 years ago
Its not your falt, the main stream media destroyed him during the election.
He is the only man I have seen in a long time who is fit to be commander in chief
Kennykpz1979 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
curiouser and curiouser the world does seem, and if you yourself are curious check my channel for some fun
ShidoshiKiirya 2 years ago
in my mind Ron Paul is the only US politician with any integrity. hes also the only one who isn't fullofshit
chrismims22 2 years ago 5
Ron Paul is still sharp as a tack, Obama/McCain cant speak like him because he speaks the honest truth.
spliffsperlunk 2 years ago
Americans are idiots they voted for McObama and not Ron Paul, and now they reap their rewards=record inflation,record deficit,record unemployment.
Americans need to pull their heads out of the MainStream Medias azz and think for themselves before they vote next time.
spliffsperlunk 2 years ago 3
in all fairness to the people of the US, first i dont vote because its pointless, however if every single american voted for Ron Paul, he still wouldn't be the president because the electoral college vote are the only ones that truly count.
chrismims22 2 years ago
shit man if the happens the second revolution will happen
dopeboy909 2 years ago
People with your mindset are the idiots that I was referring to.
spliffsperlunk 2 years ago
well put
Kennykpz1979 2 years ago
God Bless Ron Paul.
END THE FED!!!!
thudmother 2 years ago 2
Ron Paul for Prez!!
a63975 2 years ago 2
Ron Paul is my president. Give me an honest man to run our country any day over these lying criminals like Bush and Obama.
LiveFreeOrDieNow 2 years ago 3
Ron Paul is a great man!!!
killergames187 2 years ago
Corporatism, is a great description.
tonylee1973 2 years ago
So which political party do you think is going to put Ron Paul on the ticket? Republicans think he's too left or at least too far from the right, and the left is going to stick with Obama...i'd like to see him run as an independant, but that rarely works.
729Drew 2 years ago
LOL, Bob's a friend too...
tell ya what, if any of you is in contact with someone YOU KNOW was connected with Ron's campaign, like Justine Lam or Debbie Hopper or Andrew Ward or Joe Seehusen, why don't you just ask them about me? They're all friends of mine.
In the meantime, let's promote Ron! Did you guys know that Rand Paul and Peter Schiff are both going to be on Morning Joe this Thurs (9/16)? That's exciting!
shanajk 2 years ago
Does it get more shallow than Mika Brzezinski, the preppy hairdo who disdained Ron Paul as "a nut" in the Republican primaries? I must confess that I felt sympathy for the guy who mugged her $6 while she was waiting for a cab ;P
jaralero 2 years ago
El Gran Campeon de la Constitucion!
Rooooooooooooon Paul!
chewbaca1989 2 years ago 3
You have to understand that most of those that are being extreme in this Movement are more so emboldened by propaganda from people like Glenn Beck, though he makes sidelining good lines about freedom and transparency and limited govt. The idea of misinterpretation is too big now. There is such a big disconnect between what the bills actually give power to and who controls that power. Even though some points may be true not all should be believed it takes a proper education to really get it.
LibertasPraesidium 2 years ago
I hope there are more people out there like Ron Paul because we need them to help rebuild this country
codeman1979 2 years ago 2
Umm, I know Joe and Ron. Joe really does respect and admire Ron. Dangerous? Illuminati? lol, oh my
shanajk 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Sure you know them, looser.
ariaane 2 years ago
I grew up in Ron's dist., he delivered 2 of my cousins, my dad works w/his oldest son, Ronnie Jr., I was Ron's Field Coord. in my state as well as the founder & national coord. of Homeschoolers for Ron Paul & until recently the Campaign for Liberty state coordinator for my state. I have his home phone and personal email address. I haven't known Joe as long, but talk to, email or txt with him on a da basis. So, yes I know them both. Is it really that hard to believe? They're both just men.
shanajk 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Right...
People who truly know a politician, just like people who truly have a lot of money, don't name drop and tell all in the comments section of youtube.
Such self-agrandisation reveals you as desperate and pathetic.
Get a life.
ariaane 2 years ago
No convincing you I actually do know them, huh? Oh well.
I'm still puzzled by this comment "People who truly know a politician..." u do realize politicians work for u, right? They're just people- your employees n fact. Why is it such a big deal to know a politician? If your reps. don't know your name & face, you're not involved enough. Have you done what Ron told us to do? Have u gotten involved with the local & state party? Are u making a difference?
Or just leaving comments here?
shanajk 2 years ago
Ron Paul SPEAKS THE TRUTH!!!!
It's a DAMN shame that this man isn't our President!
robert7232 2 years ago 8
Why would he call Ron a nut? Joe voted for him in the primary and had him on his show several times during the election cycle.
shanajk 2 years ago
Name me one that hasn't got support from those groups? Your arguement is weak. RonPaulGeorge...
XxUrSoLoStxX 2 years ago
Viva Ron Paul!!!
END THE FED!!!
EndTheFedRes 2 years ago 2
Rep. Ron Paul is a Genius & a Honest man.
jonnysport89 2 years ago 4
The great thing about RP is that he is not necessarily a genius, he's a very honest man pointing out the obvious. There's no complexity to what he's talking about. It's simple math
kalidyne 2 years ago 10
I see the government bloggers are out in force.
stracinsrt4 2 years ago
ariaane where do you get your numbers and who are you to say 95% crazies? Oh i get it you were the other 5% as usual. I can't believe you went back to sleep maybe it's better. Ron paul das always said that it was our revolution not his.
XxUrSoLoStxX 2 years ago
Oh, the Constitution is "crazy" to these people, raised on spoon fed democracy... Restore the Republic!
MKeyserSoze 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I didn't call those who abide by the constitution as crazy.
I called the *followers* of Ron Paul- predominantly lonely white males who display unmatched arrogance and superiority as crazy.
And don't get me started on the conspiracy theorist types who comprise the majority of the Ron Paul movement.
Ron Paul's movement is not the problem- it's his LOOSER OBSSESSED followers.
Get a life.
ariaane 2 years ago
I had a life, now it's been taken from me. 50% of my income is stolen at the point of a gun by the govt. Who can afford a life anymore?
MKeyserSoze 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Fine.
But you Ron Paul lovers treat the Ron Paul movement as if it is a RELIGION.
You guys need to step back, and check yourselves, becasue your conduct is turning many people away from any legitimate points you may have.
I am socially conservative, and was fiscally conservative up until recently. I now am hovering between fiscal and moderate conservatism, as I've learned to think for myself, and not just repeat Ron Paul talking points.
I see that there is a bigger picture.
ariaane 2 years ago
ariaane, You've provided no examples of the "religion", nor have you refuted -- or listed -- "Ron Paul talking points".
Please do so, or stop hurling insults.
MooseOfReason 2 years ago
Watch this great documentary film to learn the truth about the I.R.S. :
America Freedom to Fascism
youtube . com / watch ?v=3-2JDfX_68U
RonPaul2008dotcomluv 2 years ago
Comment removed
XxUrSoLoStxX 2 years ago
Ron Paul movement 2007-2008
A broad mix of libertarians, liberals, independents, conservatives
30% loonies (no greater than ANY candidate)
"Tea Party" (Tea Bagger) movement 2009
90% Reagan/Limbaugh/GOP zombies
Hypocrites, morons, & a sizeable % of racists
10% are truly concerned with fiscal discipline.
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ron Paul Movement:
Less than 1% of the US population, and comprised of pathetic small dicked white males, who are just about as dillusional as their social counterparts.
95% conspiracy theorist crazies.
No liberals exist within the movement at all.
Tea Party movement:
A mix of predominantly blue dog democrats/moderates, independants, libertarians, republicans and conservatives.
PS- I used to love RP- but the stank attitude of most libertarians has put me off him.
ariaane 2 years ago
It's not about Ron Paul. It never was, certainly not for me. If you argue that Paul did not get any support from anti-war (war on drugs, MIC) "liberals", as did Kucinich and other non-mainstream candidates, then it is you who are delusional.
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 2 years ago
Ummm, I'm a classical liberal, and I "follow" him or if you will, agree with on on every stance. If you really get irritated at Ron Paul supporters, then ignore them. I don't really care if they believe in a 9/11 conspiracy, just as long as they look up and learn the austrian business cycle.
Betty5150 2 years ago 2
Well call me Shirley...Finally! Mother of GOD! Some recognized MAINSTREAM MEDIA credit for this...I want to hurl everytime I hear Limbaugh/Hannity/Beck, claiming credit for the Liberty movement. Claiming that THEY predicted the financial crisis. That THEY'RE the defenders of the Constitution- makes me SICK. and Thank you Joe you've always been respectful-
soundgarden21 2 years ago 3
I have to agree with ryanjiii - these two are long time friends. Considering the disrespect Dr Paul received during the Presidential primary debates from Fox news and Charles Gibson, Joe's interviews are refreshing.
Dr Paul - you a genius.
cato58 2 years ago 8
This has been flagged as spam show
Ron Paul for President!
cyberpunkmonk 2 years ago
We need competing currencies. Once we feel there is corruption in one currency we can choose to use the other. Ron Paul knows the crooks want one "rigged" currency
midwestcharm 2 years ago 2
Is it to late to throw Obama out of office and make Ron Paul our new President?
DNLTOA 2 years ago 11
paul gets credit FINALLY! YES!!
satchelmcqueenvideo 2 years ago 9
Too little, too late. Of course he is always right: He's not a NWO puppet like all of the rest, he is a puplic servant who has the people's best interest in mind and not the corporations and elites.
Lobbying should be banned. It is legalized bribery.
PatriotReport 2 years ago 2
I hope Joe Scarborough's question is rhetorical, or else he's just being redundant like that parochial idiot, Bill Maher.
Jiffylubeification 2 years ago
Huffington Post is full of economic illiterate statists who convulse as the sight of an R. Just ignore the idiots or laugh in the face, since they're no better than the neocons at LFG or HotAir.
Jiffylubeification 2 years ago
great interview but i have to say that is really bothers me to here Scarborough call Dr. Paul 'Ron'. It is very disrespectful.
historyofpainters 2 years ago
why is it disrespectful? joe scarborough served in congress with ron paul and they are friends.
ryanjiii 2 years ago
Agreed. Ariana Huffington was more respectful to him than Joe Scarborough was.
numberoneclutchfan 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
historyofpainters 2 years ago
Great Interview
dgrabaskas 2 years ago 5
Thank you once again Congressman Paul.
We the informed people keep thanking him,
and the sheeple keep re-electing morons.
randyinwa 2 years ago 8
Paul/Scarborough 2012?!!
norfair18 2 years ago
id vote for it, would probably be the other way around tho if they actually wanted to win
jbehar11 2 years ago
hey, Mika - tell your dad I said "hello from the chattel."
BagOfEyebrows 2 years ago
Doctor, this patient needs a prescription of truth!!
stix42k 2 years ago 4
Man, I like how he slams conservatives in there several times! Conservatism is a bogus ideology!
Libertarianism (ie. liberty) is where it's at!
atrickpay11 2 years ago 4
Man Ron is on fire here!
----
"Government is just a word for some people who claim authority over other people." - Glenn Jacobs
atrickpay11 2 years ago 6
Great job Ron. Keep spreading the message of liberty!
atrickpay11 2 years ago 6