Gian played it horrendously. He check calls flop with top two pairs on drawy board then cs turn allowing lamb to check behind. Gian should've bet river as a value/blocker bet. It's unlikely lamb would've tried to
Bluff. On the river Gian has only a bluff catcher against that overbet
@ucla198 I disagree. If Ben had just a paired ace, his plays would have made sense and I think that is what was going on in Gian's head. He would have bet the turn with a flush draw or with A2. I don't think there is anything to put Ben on a flush draw or on a 2, so what else could he have had? Trips?
@CyclonexxxIce I mean, he's only playing for what could be 8 million + making a call on a rough river card for a third of his stack. Haha, I'd take at least 10 minutes. His mistake was thinking he could get a tell off Ben Lamb....nope, impossible haha : )
When the board pairs, someone with AK or AQ might think they are now ahead for sure... and with A9 Giannetti had a 2 pair that beats AA22x so he's thinking what kind of hands would overbet, many are bluffs like missed draws or middle pairs that are trying to represent a flopped set. The over-sized bet sure got him thinking though, it's rarely a bluff nowadays.
This has been flagged as spam show
FREEROLLS EVERY 15 MINUTES
ON HIGHPULSE POKER
BUILD YOUR BANK BALANCE
USING CODE POKERCHIPS
NO DEPOSIT REQUIRED
YES NO DEPOSIT !!!
champions20000009 3 months ago
Gian played it horrendously. He check calls flop with top two pairs on drawy board then cs turn allowing lamb to check behind. Gian should've bet river as a value/blocker bet. It's unlikely lamb would've tried to
Bluff. On the river Gian has only a bluff catcher against that overbet
ucla198 3 months ago
@ucla198 I disagree. If Ben had just a paired ace, his plays would have made sense and I think that is what was going on in Gian's head. He would have bet the turn with a flush draw or with A2. I don't think there is anything to put Ben on a flush draw or on a 2, so what else could he have had? Trips?
flippinablazing 3 months ago
Yeah he took 10 mins
ucla198 3 months ago
@cyclonexxxice why was it way absurd?
dahl0633 4 months ago
From watching this live apparently Giannetti took like 10 minutes during that river decision. They didn't mention it much here but it was way absurd.
CyclonexxxIce 4 months ago 2
@CyclonexxxIce thats true, I was watching fullcoverage, he took ages to call!
kazikartinec 4 months ago
@CyclonexxxIce I mean, he's only playing for what could be 8 million + making a call on a rough river card for a third of his stack. Haha, I'd take at least 10 minutes. His mistake was thinking he could get a tell off Ben Lamb....nope, impossible haha : )
wspsaves 3 months ago
@CyclonexxxIce: He is fully within his rights to take as long as he needs to call, it was a big decision
ClarkeForPresident 3 months ago
@CyclonexxxIce not "aburd" at all.
When the board pairs, someone with AK or AQ might think they are now ahead for sure... and with A9 Giannetti had a 2 pair that beats AA22x so he's thinking what kind of hands would overbet, many are bluffs like missed draws or middle pairs that are trying to represent a flopped set. The over-sized bet sure got him thinking though, it's rarely a bluff nowadays.
simonjeste 2 months ago