Added: 1 year ago
From: Abbujak
Views: 1,162
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Ironically, a Muslim put this video together rejecting the fact that all the panelists agree that Jesus died a physical death. This is a completelly distorted prospective from a Muslim that ignores the fact that Jesus died for the redemption if sin

  • @milkydud This is for education that even all Christians do not agree on Trinity, there are many who reject Trinity like Muslims, so such Christians are closer to Islam, which rejects the death of Jesus Christ at the cross which many Christians also do not agree details at h t tp : / / wp.me / PCgrB -cW and h t tp : / /goo.gl / ySmGV [copy link & remove spaces]

  • @Abbujak "his is for education that even all Christians do not agree on Trinity, there are many who reject Trinity like Muslims, so such Christians are closer to Islam"

    So you believe Sir Anthony Buzzard and John Good are BOTH MUSLIMS or do they both believe that Jesus DIED?

    In what sense are these scholars closer to being Muslim?

    Have you seen this FULL debate... parts 1 & 2 and the Q&A section?

    Do you find it true that not all Muslim scholars agree on if Budda is/isn't a prophet of Islam?

  • @Abbujak You said come Christians reject Jesus' death. Now who is a Christian? A Christian is one who believes in Jesus as the Son of God that died for their sins and rose again. What in the world are you talking about? Any one who does not believe in Jesus' death and resurrection is not a Christian. About Islam' denial of Jesus' death. That is the greatest lie ever told by Satan who deceived Muhammed into accepting Jesus never died.

  • I have one question! Where are the responses from the two other scholars? I saw a version that had their comments and they just absolutely destroyed the jew guy and the BUZZARD. and when I mean destroy, he really tore them up because they gave scripture to refute them.

  • @viper2808 Please take a fresh look at the title, it is clearly mentioned at the very start of of this video "Monotheistic [Anti-Trinitarian] Perspective" more over its also mentioned "Excerpts from Debate Deity of Christ and & Trinity". I disagree that the opponents destroyed the arguments through references from scripture. However every one is entitled to his views.

  • God as One, nothing can stand apart and nothing would have a Free Will. God is Divine as One to bring out of the Unique beyond all Understanding , the Whole Reality , gathered and rolled up into One Collection , is then the Being of God, which takes in all material aspects possible. God is able to be the Surrounding Power to sustain the Universe, then also able as a Free Will of Himself, to move within the Whole as a Part of the Whole and appear as the Identity of Himself, anywhere.

  • @Abbujak the same text interchanges the term angels with men, so if you are so smart, then interpret that before you claim you know anything about God at all. When the Three Visitors were together, in a group, like a "Set Notation of a Collection of things" The collective was addressed as Elihenu , the God who has all things within Himself as One. When the angels were separated , two angels became men who went to Sodom, and then the Divine God, remained in the one left. 3=1

  • IN Genesis 18 Three Visitors come to Abraham and are received in unison , called Lord and bowed to, and the three Visitors answer Abraham twice in Unison and there is not one of the visitors, surpassing the other two to step out and answer Abraham, who called out "Lord" . So this revelation of Moses' Law is about how God is One Being, but able to be Three Persons, without Material Rational doubts about it. God is able to be all the angels, spirits , powers, principalities and be One.

  • Appearance of God as three persons in Genesis 18 is not proved even in the same chapter. The three visitors to Abraham were angels, God communicated with Abraham in presence of angels. Abraham addresses himself first to one person Ge 18:3, then to more than one Ge 18:4-5. Then the singular number is resumed in Ge 18:10-20. Ge 18:22 "'the men' turned their faces and went toward Sodom, and Abraham was yet standing before the Lord." More bible-pedia dot blogspot dot com/2011/09/trinity-q.html

  • @CarmineFragione Appearance of God as 3 persons in Genesis 18 is not proved. God communicated with Abraham in presence of 3 angels. Abraham addresses himself first to one person Ge 18:3, then to more than one Ge 18:4-5. Then the singular number is resumed in Ge 18:10-20. In Ge 18:22 "'the men' turned their faces and went toward Sodom, and Abraham was yet standing before the Lord." Other verses of Bible which unambiguously mention about Oneness of God More h t t p goo.gl slash ye35o

  • I like how u editied out james white's rebuattal's that was real honest of you dude we need more like you.

  • AMAZING! When the disciple JOHN wrote that "no man had seen [G*d] at any time" he was speaking of his own Era and generation! How dumb can people be? How many scriptures prove that YAHWEH showed himself MANY times?

    Exodus 24:9-10 9 Then went up Moses, and Aaron, Nadab, and Abihu, and SEVENTY of the Elders of ISRAEL:

    10 And THEY SAW YAHWEH of Israel: and there was under HIS FEET as it were a paved work of a sapphire stone, and as it were the BODY of Heaven in His Clearness.

    Geesh!

  • interesting

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more